Airbus Progamme Review

Transcription

1 Airbus Progamme Review Tom WILLIAMS Executive Vice President Programmes Global Investor Forum 2009, Broughton, 1 st & 2 nd April

2 Safe Harbour Statement Disclaimer This presentation includes forward-looking statements. Words such as anticipates, believes, estimates, expects, intends, plans, projects, may and similar expressions are used to identify these forward-looking statements. Examples of forward-looking statements include statements made about strategy, ramp-up and delivery schedules, introduction of new products and services and market expectations, as well as statements regarding future performance and outlook. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risk and uncertainty because they relate to future events and circumstances and there are many factors that could cause actual results and developments to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These factors include but are not limited to: Changes in general economic, political or market conditions, including the cyclical nature of some of EADS businesses; Significant disruptions in air travel (including as a result of terrorist attacks); Currency exchange rate fluctuations, in particular between the Euro and the U.S. dollar; The successful execution of internal performance plans, including cost reduction and productivity efforts; Product performance risks, as well as programme development and management risks; Customer, supplier and subcontractor performance or contract negotiations, including financing issues; Competition and consolidation in the aerospace and defence industry; Significant collective bargaining labour disputes; The outcome of political and legal processes, including the availability of government financing for certain programmes and the size of defence and space procurement budgets; Research and development costs in connection with new products; Legal, financial and governmental risks related to international transactions; Legal and investigatory proceedings and other economic, political and technological risks and uncertainties. As a result, EADS actual results may differ materially from the plans, goals and expectations set forth in such forward-looking statements. For a discussion of factors that could cause future results to differ from such forward-looking statements, see EADS Registration Document dated 24th April Any forward-looking statement contained in this presentation speaks as of the date of this presentation. EADS undertakes no obligation to publicly revise or update any forward-looking statements in light of new information, future events or otherwise. 2 2

3 Content A320 and A330 A380 A350 A400M 3 3

4 A320 Family Programme Introduction 472 A320 family A/C Net orders in 2008 leading to a backlog of more than 2598 A/C, representing more than 6 years production 386 A320 family A/C delivered in 2008: with 93% On time Delivery and 93% Customer satisfaction Production rate: currently at 36 A/C and from Oct 09 (St 40) at 34 A/C per month and being reviewed according to the market demand Milestones in 2009: 500th delivery of A321 in February 1st delivery of an A/C produced in FAL China in June 4000th delivery of A320 family in August Major developments: Extended Service Goal, Pax-to- Freighter conversion, 78t MOTW certification. 4 4

5 A330/A340 Programme Introduction 138 A330/A340 A/C Net orders in 2008 leading to a backlog of more than 450 A/C, representing more than 5 years production 85 A330/A340 A/C delivered in 2008: with 91% On time Delivery and 94% Customer satisfaction Production rate: capped at 8.5 A/C per month and being reviewed according to the market demand Milestones in 2009: 100 th operator and 1,000 th delivery Major developments: A Freighter, Multi Role Tanker. 5 5

6 Single Aisle & Long Range Improvements Reduction of production lead times. Deployment of Lean Manufacturing. Aerostructure and Systems re-design to cost. Improvement in supplier delivery and quality. 6 6

7 Content A320 and A330 A380 A350 A400M 7 7

8 A380 Production Status 31 customer aircraft are assembled. 13 aircraft have been delivered: 6 for Singapore Airlines (SIA) 4 for Emirates Airlines (UAE) 3 for Qantas Airlines (QFA) 7 aircraft are in various stages for cabin furnishing/painting in Hamburg, 11 are in the Final Assembly Line (FAL) process in Toulouse. Two new customers, Air France and Lufthansa will start their service with A380 aircraft by end of 2009 and beginning of 2010 A380 Production Ramp-up is under way 8 8

9 A380 Wave 1 Status 5 Wave 1 aircraft (1xUAE, 4xSIA) in Hamburg for furnishing / painting. Those 5 aircraft are targeted to be delivered during the first semester The sections for the last wave 1 aircraft (SIA) are under finalisation on Major component assembly level for start of final assembly line ST40 in April Targeted delivery to the customer for this aircraft is beginning of This will then end the Wave 1 activities! 9 9

10 A380 Wave 2 Status First Customer Heads of Version are under way: QFA MSN 26, the first Wave 2 aircraft in Hamburg for outfitting. AFR MSN 33, as well in Hamburg for outfitting UAE MSN 23 to be ferried to Hamburg in March to receive its cabin DLH MSN 38 under assembly in Toulouse Rebuild aircraft are as well already in production: 7 Wave 2 rebuild aircraft currently in FAL Toulouse. New delay had been encountered end of 2008 on the first aircraft, as the volume of design activities was underestimated as well as the global workload effect in manufacturing and the stability of the supply chain. This has had a knock on effect on the following aircraft, which had let to a smoothening of the ramp-up. Situation clear now and industrial processes under execution as planned 10 10

11 A380 Maturity Customers have high expectations. All new high technology aircraft coded pieces of equipment. Small fleets with very high levels of utilisation. High level of focus within Airbus. Close co-operation with customers. Major meet and greet activity at key airports

12 Content A320 and A330 A380 A350 A400M 12 12

13 DARE - The new Logic for the A350 XWB Development 1. Benchmark lead time 2 to 3 years 5 to 6 years As is Predevelopment Development Ramp-up To be 2 years Predevelopment 4 to 4,5 years EIS Development to maturity Ramp-up 2. Faster ramp-up Nb of a/c Strategy confirmed Robust launch DELIVERY STREAM BY 6 ROLLING MONTHS FROM FIRST DELIVERY A350 XWB Target 3. Maturity at Entry into service High reliability A320 A350 1A A340 basic A320 A380 DEL scheduled PP6 A3456 High Availability Low Maintenance Costs 0 18 months 36 months Time 13 13

14 A350 XWB Development Master Schedule Design Development to maturity Ramp-up Manufacturing & assembly 3 years Flight test 15 months Design freeze Detailed definition freeze Start of final assembly First flight EIS -900 EIS -800 EIS Stronger management of milestones. Peer review. Close involvement of key suppliers

15 The A350XWB Plateaux The Central Programme functions and support functions are co-located in Toulouse. This constitutes the A350XWB Central Programme Plateau. The management teams of the PLM PDT and Systems PDTs are also part of the Central Plateau. The activities related to sections and to the systems equipment are decentralized in CoC / CoE plateaux under their leadership. Central Programme Plateau Chief Engineer Team Airframe & Systems Installation Overall Integration Plateau A Requirements and V&V Safety Airworthiness PDT PLM Systems OAD Systems PowerPlant Landing Gear Cabin & Cargo Configuration Management P&M Tools PowerPlant Finance Costing Business Development Procurement Airlines Operations Industrial Project Performance Quality & Maturity HR CoE/CoC Plateaux Fuselage Cabin & Cargo Empennage Wing Powerplant Systems & Landing Gear Testing 15 15

16 A350 XWB Fuselage Baseline Configuration Skin panels, doublers, joints, stringers in CFRP Except cockpit with Aluminium skin panels Door frame surroundings & high load frames in Ti Typical frames in CFRP Front cockpit in Aluminium Pax doors in CFRP Full S19 / 19.1 in CFRP NLGB & windshield frame in Aluminium Cargo doors in CFRP CFRP = Carbon fibre MLGB = Main Landing Gear Bay NLGB = Nose Landing Gear Bay Ti = Titanium Alu = Aluminium Centre wing box & keel beam in CFRP Rib 1 in Alu-Li, forgings & MLGB in Alu 16 16

17 A350 Extended Enterprise Policy Through the A350 Extended Enterprise, Airbus and its suppliers : Follow the same development logic use the same tools use the same methods & processes exchange Electronic Data run a Change Process develop a reinforced collaborative mindset A350 Extended Enterprise is a structured approach deployed across Airbus in an homogeneous way and a step towards a reinforced partnership 17 17

18 Content A320 and A330 A380 A350 A400M 18 18

19 Background Long lasting sales campaign dating from FLA. Launch date came out at the worst point for Airbus. Lack of non specific design activity in previous Airbus partners. Multi mission role leads to a complex set of requirements. Lack of experience in Airbus for High Wing, T tail, turbo prop aicraft and military qualification. Strong pressure from Nations to adopt the EPI engine as opposed to the cheaper and less risky Pratt and Whitney solution for the most powerful engine propeller combination ever developed. Fixed Price Contract ( Commercial Approach ) with unbalanced Risk taking

20 Military Programmes Comparison Years after Development Contract Boeing 737 AEW&C Wedgetail - Australia C 130 J Version Operational delivery C 17A NH90 Tiger Eurofighter Rafale A400M Contractual FF 1 st Delivery IOC Step n Production Contract Programme up to today Programme forecast 20 20

21 Programme Execution Complex work share Still using the National Company based development teams. Better integration of design tools and Product Data Management (PDM). Significant early changes in aircraft configuration. Integrated Fuselage Assembly (IFA) represents a major stretch for the local team (a mini FAL), they were not sufficiently supported by the Airbus organisation. EPI not organised as a proper programme management organisation, causing long delay on hardware and control software delivery and hence postponing the first flight and the flight test programme

22 Key Challenges for 2009 Recover the engine hardware and control software delays. Achieve first flight. Manage the suppliers on the critical systems to re-establish the schedule. Manage the improvement of internal Airbus Programme re-organisation and governance system, including the integration of MTAD Conclude the negotiation with customers for contract adjustments on schedule, technical specification and finance. 4 prototype aircraft in the Final Assembly Line 22 22

23 Contractual Re-negotiation Airbus Military proposal on the A400M Contract re-negotiation based on 3 main principles: Schedule adjustment Technical Specification adjustment Commercial adjustment 23 23

24 A400M Programme with Risk Reduction Approach Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Y6 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 A400M Programme Risk reduction Approach FF IOC Flight Test Programme 24 months Maturity Gate MSN7 SCAs IOC MSN7 FAL SOC 1 SOC 2 MSN M 3M 3M 2M 2M 2M 2M EIS Based on the time Zero approach (based on FADEC availability) 24 24

25 Supporting Actions Highest level of programme commitment from EADS. New programme organisation in EPI - Better programme commitment and engagement after EADS Audit with EPI. New Airbus Military organisation, integrating MTAD Stronger support at Powerplant management through the Airbus CoC (Centre of Competence) Powerplant High level focus through weekly reviews with CEO

26 Powerplant Development Status Engine Test Programme flight clearance target mid 2009 Flying Test Bed 50 FH target Q Improved Engine Hardware delivery to MSN001 Q MSN001 Static engine ground run Q FADEC Software the Critical path for MSN001 first flight Flight clearance by EPI expected early Q Airbus system integration test with FADEC early Q MSN001 flight clearance acceptance by EASA Q Final date for first flight to be confirmed. To be confirmed 26 26

27 A400M Operational Capabilities Notwithstanding the immediate challenges ahead the A400M will meet the demanding requirements of both operational and humanitarian missions because: A400M provides true Logistic (Inter-Theatre) Airlift: - High Cruise Speed, Long Range, Outsize Load Capacity A400M is a better Tactical Airlifter than current fleets: - Greater Manouvrability Softer Field Capability Better Self-Protection A400M has a built-in Air-to-Air Refuelling capability: - Fast / high enough for fast-jets plus slow / low enough for helicopters... capabilities which put the A400M into a class of its own