The Importance of the Pharmaceutical Industry for Switzerland

Transcription

1 A study undertaken on behalf of Interpharma The Importance of the Pharmaceutical Industry for Switzerland Polynomics Dr. Stephan Vaterlaus, Dr. Stephan Suter, Barbara Fischer In cooperation with BAK Basel Economics

2 Published by: Interpharma, Association of research-based pharmaceutical companies in Switzerland, Basel Interpharma /Polynomics, September 2011 Ordering address: Interpharma Petersgraben 35, P.O. Box CH-4003 Basel Website: Layout: Continue AG, Basel Printing: Effingerhof, Brugg

3 Table of contents Preface by the client In brief The pharmaceutical industry as an employer Numbers of persons employed Hours worked Importance for other sectors The pharmaceutical industry s added value contribution The pharmaceutical industry s direct contribution to growth Importance for other sectors Productivity of the pharmaceutical industry Productivity per job Added value per hour worked The pharmaceutical industry as an export sector Estimate of tax revenue and consumer spending Summary Annex 1: Demarcation of sectors Annex 2: Methods Input-output table Calculation of multipliers List of sources

4 Preface by the client Thomas B. Cueni, Secretary General of Interpharma The global macroeconomic environment is currently characterized by turmoil of various types. To take an example, the banking crisis in the wake of the collapse of Lehman Brothers (the US investment bank) was followed by the debt crisis in various European countries. This was accompanied by a significant strengthening of the Swiss franc, against which (in particular) Switzerland s export-oriented sectors increasingly have to battle on the basis of their international competitive capabilities. Finally, the regulatory environment has become even stricter. The trend toward more intensive sector-specific regulation appears to be continuing unabated. In recent months, for instance, political discussions focused on regulatory measures to overcome the banking crisis, or the regulation of energy markets. Another constant topic as regards sector regulation is the healthcare sector. Catchphrases such as the planned introduction of Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG), the renewed discussions about a single health insurance scheme and measures to cut healthcare expenditure have featured in political debates for a number of years. 2 Polynomics / BAK Basel Economics

5 The pharmaceutical industry is a key player in the healthcare sector. Its core characteristics are its dependency on research and development, its international nature and its ability to adapt to constant changes in prevailing conditions. This adaptability can best be demonstrated by taking a look at the changes in the chemical-pharmaceutical industry since the start of the 1990s. At that time, for example, the chemical industry s share of the total number of persons employed in life sciences in the metropolitan region of Basel was 84 %; the figure for the pharmaceutical industry was 10 %, and agrotech/medtech accounted for 6 %. Barely 20 years later, the weightings have shifted significantly in favour of the pharmaceutical industry (56 %) and the agrotech and medtech sectors (24 %). The classical chemical industry now accounts for a mere 20 % of jobs. The subsectors of the chemical-pharmaceutical industry differ in many respects. Despite the pharmaceutical industry s strong growth over recent decades, the sector s effective importance in terms of the national economy cannot be determined on the basis of official statistics. The chemical-pharmaceutical industry continues to be reported in production and added value statistics as one joint sector, and in some cases it is even combined with mineral oil processing. For the reasons outlined above, Interpharma has again commissioned Polynomics, in cooperation with BAK Basel Economics, to determine the importance of the pharmaceutical industry for Switzerland, for the fourth time following the studies in 2005, 2007 and Interpharma Thomas B. Cueni, Secretary General The importance of the pharmaceutical industry for Switzerland 3

6 1 In brief The pharmaceutical industry, as a key driving force of the Swiss economy, was unfazed by the recent economic crisis. Growth in real gross added value during the crisis years of 2008 and 2009 was approximately 7 %, with a slowdown to about 4 % in Forecasts continue to be optimistic for the current year, so the pharmaceutical industry can again expect stronger growth than the overall economy. Although the growth in the number of persons employed in the overall economy was an average of 1.5 % per year from 2005 to 2010, growth in the pharmaceutical industry was twice as high, namely at 3 %. When including jobs in the supplier industries, more than 135,000 jobs were dependent on the pharmaceutical industry in This sector delivers above-average productivity and is directly and indirectly responsible for added value of almost CHF 30 billion, equivalent to a share of 5.7 % of nominal gross domestic product. Moreover, since 1990, the pharmaceutical sector increased its exports by a factor of seven (in terms of value), and it now contributes more than 30 % of Switzerland s total exports. The chemical-pharmaceutical industry has ranked as a key driving force of the Swiss economy for many years. However, official data sources do not make it possible to report the importance of the Swiss pharmaceutical industry in isolation. This gap is closed by the present publication, commissioned by Interpharma and now appearing for the fourth time. In addition to the latest statistical data, this study also includes a new input-output table dating from 2008, which is used as the basis for calculating the indirect effects. The key results are briefly summarized below and are set out in table 1. The last decade was characterized by a phase of impressive growth for the pharmaceutical industry, which was ushered in by international structural changes of the 1990s. The restructuring of the sector led to increased efficiency which, up to the present time, is apparent not merely in the high growth of added value, but also on the labour market. The pharmaceutical industry is a major employer in Switzerland. If account is taken of the interdependencies with upstream and downstream enterprises, over 135,000 jobs in Switzerland were dependent on this sector in 2010, including 36,700 that can be attributed directly to the pharmaceutical industry. The sector also delivers above-average productivity, amounting in 2010 to CHF 232 per hour worked, or more than CHF 400,000 per person employed per year, equivalent to more than three times the average productivity in the overall economy. 4 Polynomics / BAK Basel Economics

7 Table 1 Direct and indirect impact of the pharmaceutical industry, 2010 Direct importance Indirect importance Total Multiplier Gross added value CHF million 14,800 14,400 29, As % of total for Switzerland 2.9 % 2.8 % 5.7 % Persons employed Number of employees 36,700 98, , As % of total for Switzerland 0.8 % 2.2 % 3.0 % Hours worked Million hours As % of total for Switzerland 0.9 % 2.2 % 3.1 % Exports CHF million 60,638 As % of total for Switzerland 31.4 % Sources: Polynomics, BAK Basel Economics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, Swiss Federal Statistical Office (SFSO), General Directorate for Customs (GDC). Countries outside Switzerland represent a key sales market for the pharmaceutical industry. Accordingly, exports rose from CHF 8 billion in 1990 to CHF 60.6 billion in Moreover, the development of added value in the pharmaceutical industry was always positive in recent years. In 2010, the sector generated about CHF 29.2 billion in added value (including CHF 14.8 billion directly in the pharma ceutical industry), equivalent to a share of 5.7 % of the nominal gross domestic product. Nominal added value was increasingly burdened by rising price pressure and the development of exchange rates, i.e. the strengthening of the franc, so the very high growth rates of the past are at present no longer equaled; real growth nevertheless remains robust and high at over 4 %. Finally, thanks to its employees, the pharmaceutical industry delivers a key contribution to the Swiss economy above and beyond the achievements already mentioned. This is because tax payments and consumer expenditure by employees in the pharmaceutical sector are significantly higher than the national average. The importance of the pharmaceutical industry for Switzerland 5

8 2 The pharmaceutical industry as an employer 2.1 Numbers of persons employed The importance of the pharmaceutical industry as an employer has continued to grow in recent years. Whereas fewer than 20,000 persons were employed in the pharmaceutical industry in 1990, the number of pharmaceutical jobs has increased continuously since then, to reach the highest ever level of 36,680 persons employed in 2010 (cf. figure 1). This development is especially impressive when viewed in the overall economic context. At the macroeconomic level, a decline in the number of employed persons had to be overcome in seven out of the last 20 years. The years between 1992 and 1997, in particular, were typified by ongoing downturns. The development of jobs in the pharmaceutical industry presents a very different picture was the only year when the number of persons employed was below the prior year s level. This difference in development as regards job development is also reflected in the annual growth trend. Since 1990, 3.2 % additional jobs were created in the pharmaceutical industry each year. By way of comparison, the annual growth trend for the overall economy was 0.6 %. However, the discrepancy in growth between development rates in the pharmaceutical industry and the overall economy has diminished somewhat in recent years, not least because a good 1.5 % additional jobs were created per year across all sectors in Switzerland during the period from 2005 and Excursus 1 The international character of employees in the pharmaceutical sector The pharmaceutical industry in Switzerland is confronted not only with a shortage of basic chemical products, but also with a lack of specialist manpower. Because the sector is geared to specialized products with high added value, there is a major demand for experts which cannot be met solely by Swiss employees. As a consequence, large and small pharmaceutical enterprises report high percentages of foreign employees. Since the search for talents is not restricted to Europe, the quota of persons employed from outside Europe is also higher than in other sectors. The international composition of the workforce can, for example, be illustrated with the help of corporate data from Actelion, Novartis and Roche. The breakdown of employees by nationality for the respective Swiss divisions of these 6 Polynomics / BAK Basel Economics

9 companies at the start of 2011 indicates that a good 60 % of the employees are of foreign nationality. Employees from about 84 countries work at Roche, and as many as 95 countries are represented in the workforce at Novartis. A detailed consideration of the employee structure based on origin produces the following picture: At Roche, there are different quotas of foreign employees for males and females. Whereas the quota of foreign male employees is 57 %, the figure for foreign female employees is significantly higher, at 64 %. As regards the countries of origin of these employees, a heavy concentration of European countries outside Switzerland is evident at Actelion and Novartis: At Novartis, almost 56 % of employees have an EU passport, and a further percentage originates from other European countries. The highest numbers of foreign employees come from Germany (23 %), France (19 %), the UK (5 %) and Italy (4 %). The largest percentages of non-european nationals at Novartis consist of US citizens (2.3 %) and Indians (0.8 %). Viewed by continents, the quota of North Americans (2.8 %) is the second largest following the Europeans, who account for 57 %. As regards the other continents, the quotas are 2.5 % for Asia, 0.8 % for South America, 0.5 % for Africa, and 0.3 % for Australia and New Zealand. A similar picture emerges at Actelion, where 32 % of the employees are Swiss. Most of the foreign employees have French passports (31 %), giving them almost the same representation as the Swiss employees. Other significant groups of employees at Actelion originate from Germany (18 %), the UK (5 %), Italy (3 %) and the US (1 %). Sources: Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Novartis International AG, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd Figure 2 illustrates the reduction of growth momentum in recent years. The quota of persons employed in the pharmaceutical industry in relation to persons employed in the overall economy remained constant at about 0.77 % between 2006 and In 2010, however, a new increase of about 3 % of the number of employes was evident. This meant that the quota of persons employed in the pharmaceutical sector in relation to those employed in the overall economy reached 0.8 % for the first time. 2.2 Hours worked The volume of work and the hours worked by employees in the pharmaceutical industry correlate with the growth in the number of employees. As shown in figure 3, employees in the pharmaceutical industry worked about 36 million hours in This value rose by 80 % to 64 million hours worked in It The importance of the pharmaceutical industry for Switzerland 7

10 Figure 1 Number of persons employed: pharmaceutical industry / overall economy in 1,000s 4, , , , , , , National economy (left axis) Pharmaceutical industry (right axis) Sources: Polynomics, BAK Basel Economics, SFSO. Figure 2 Erwerbstätige Number of persons in der employed Pharmaindustrie the pharmaceutical und der Gesamtwirtschaft industry / overall economy in % Sources: Polynomics, BAK Basel Economics, SFSO. 8 Polynomics / BAK Basel Economics

11 should be noted here that the number of hours worked per person employed fell from 1,830 h in 1990 to 1,730 h in In the overall economy, the yearly working hours per person employed also decreased, from 1,700 h to 1,625 h. The volume of work in the overall economy grew over this period from 6,900 million hours worked to 7,450 million hours worked, equivalent to an increase of 8 %. At 2.9 %, the average growth in hours worked between 1990 and 2010 was higher in the pharmaceutical industry than in the overall economy, where the figure was 0.4 %. In accordance with this faster growth, the proportion of hours worked in the pharmaceutical industry increased in relation to the total number of hours worked. Mirroring the progression of the quota in relation to employee activity, the discrepancy in growth diminished in respect of the volume of work during recent years (cf. figure 4). Based on an assumption of 220 working days in one year, in the pharmaceutical industry we obtain 39.4 hours worked per week in 2010, or 7.9 hours worked per day. The corresponding values for the overall economy are 36.9 h and 7.4 h respectively. In the pharmaceutical industry, an employee therefore works about Figure 3 Number of hours worked in the pharmaceutical industry / overall economy in million h National economy (left axis) Pharmaceutical industry (right axis) Sources: Polynomics, BAK Basel Economics, SFSO. The importance of the pharmaceutical industry for Switzerland 9

12 7 % more than the Swiss average. Reasons for this could include the extent of part-time employment. As table 2 shows, the quota of part-time employees differs substantially between the pharmaceutical industry and the overall economy. Taking the Swiss average, about one third of employees have a workload of less than 90 % of normal industrial working hours; in the pharmaceutical industry, this quota is a mere 13 %. Among men, part-time working is fairly infrequent in the pharmaceutical industry. A total of 3 % of men work part time, and a mere 1 % of male employees have workloads of less than 50 %. Among women, the quota of part-time employment in the pharmaceutical industry is significantly higher than for men, namely at 27 %, but only half as high as the Swiss average. Likewise, 4 % of female employees are employed for a workload of less than 50 %, a far lower figure than for the overall economy. Hence, part-time employment is far more frequent in Switzerland as a whole than in the pharmaceutical industry. This explains the longer working hours in the pharmaceutical industry as compared to the overall economy. 2.3 Importance for other sectors Almost 37,000 employees earned their livelihood in the pharmaceutical industry in In order to manufacture the pharmaceutical industry s products, input products and services are supplied by various other sectors and from abroad. The production of drugs, for instance, requires special machines, and new research or production buildings are erected by deploying technically expert manpower from the construction industry. Accordingly, it is possible to determine how many employed persons in Switzerland have benefited from pharmaceutical industry contracts in a given year in the past. For this purpose, reciprocal dependencies are determined and appropriate multipliers are calculated on the basis of available tables showing the interdependencies among the various sectors, known as input-output tables (cf. section 9). In 2010, this multiplier for the number of persons employed was 3.7 (cf. table 3). In other words, in addition to the 37,000 or so persons employed in the pharmaceutical industry, almost a further 100,000 persons were employed in Switzerland as providers of input products supporting the pharmaceutical industry with the manufacture of its products. As compared with previous calculations, the multiplier has therefore increased from 3.5 in the past to 3.7. This is mainly due to the fact that the growth in productivity in the pharmaceutical industry over past years was significantly stronger than that in the overall economy. In order to produce one unit of added value in the input sectors, substantially more work needs to be performed than is the case in the pharmaceutical industry itself. 10 Polynomics / BAK Basel Economics

13 Figure 4 Proportion of volume of work in the pharmaceutical industry to volume of work in the overall economy in % Sources: Polynomics, BAK Basel Economics, SFSO. Table 2 Part-time employment in the pharmaceutical industry, 2010 Proportions of PT I and II Proportion of PT I Proportion of PT II Total Men Women Total Men Women Total Men Women Pharma industry 13 % 3 % 27 % 11 % 2 % 23 % 2 % 1 % 4 % Overall economy 32 % 15 % 55 % 18 % 8 % 31 % 14 % 7 % 24 % Notes Part-time (PT) I and II: employees working less than 90 % of normal industrial working hours Part-time I: employees working 50 % to 89 % of normal industrial working hours Part-time II: employees working less than 50 % of normal industrial working hours Sources: Polynomics, Swiss Federal Statistical Office (SFSO, JOBSTAT). The importance of the pharmaceutical industry for Switzerland 11

14 A similar picture emerges if we consider the number of hours work required for input production, instead of the numbers of persons employed. Here too, the multiplier is above 3.6 higher than in previous studies, when a multiplier of about 3.3 was calculated. The similar increase in the multiplier at the levels of employed persons and volume of work suggests the conclusion that part-time employment has developed very similarly in the pharmaceutical industry and in the economy as a whole. This is also shown by the development of the proportion of the pharmaceutical industry s volume of work to the volume of work in the economy as a whole (cf. figure 4). Table 3 Direct and indirect importance of the pharmaceutical industry for the labour market, 2010 Persons employed Hours worked Direct importance Indirect importance Total Multiplier Number of persons 36,700 98, , As % of Switz. total 0.8 % 2.2 % 3.0 % Million hours As % of Switz. total 0.9 % 2.2 % 3.1 % Sources: Polynomics, BAK Basel Economics, SFSO. 12 Polynomics / BAK Basel Economics

15

16 3 The pharmaceutical industry s added value contribution 3.1 The pharmaceutical industry s direct contribution to growth It is possible to measure the role of a sector in terms of its contribution to growth, as well as its importance as an employer. In this case, the added value measures the income from economic activity as the difference between the overall production of an economic unit and the input products/services required in order to create the finished products/services. Hence, the added value consists of two components: work income (wages and salaries) and capital gain (profit and interest on loan capital). For the pharmaceutical industry, the gross added value therefore measures the production value of the output which it creates, after deduction of the necessary input products and services. Figure 5 shows the nominal and real gross added value (GAV) for the pharmaceutical industry and the gross domestic product (GDP), respectively. The latter reflects the total of gross added value for all sectors in Switzerland. Since 1990, the pharmaceutical industry has increased its added value (after corrections for price developments) from CHF 2.3 billion to CHF 14.9 billion. This indicates growth of almost 10 % per year. The pharmaceutical industry developed with significantly more dynamism than the overall economy, which was only able to achieve annual real growth of 1.3 % over the same period. In other words, the pharmaceutical industry was responsible for almost 12 % of macroeconomic real growth in the period from 1990 to If we compare the development rates for nominal and real growth in the pharmaceutical industry and in the overall economy since 2005, the different price pressure with which the pharmaceutical industry is confronted becomes clearly apparent. In the overall economy, growth in real gross domestic product was above the nominal figure only in In the pharmaceutical industry, however, this phenomenon occurred three times in the last five years. Moreover, the remaining years were characterized by a very moderate price development. The reasons for this below-average price trend as compared to the overall economy are to be found in the strength of the Swiss franc and a trend seen in many countries toward a reduction of national expenditure on healthcare. However, figure 5 also makes it clear that the problem in the pharmaceutical industry (if indeed there is one) relates to pricing, not growth. For instance, real growth in added value for the years from 2005 to 2010 was 9.1 % per year, placing 14 Polynomics / BAK Basel Economics

17 Figure 5 Nominal and real gross added value, pharmaceutical industry and overall economy in billion CHF Overall economy, real GDP (left axis) Overall economy, nominal GDP (left axis) Pharma industry, real gross added value (right axis) Pharma industry, nominal gross added value (right axis) Sources: Polynomics, BAK Basel Economics, BFS. Figure 6 Proportion of added value by the pharmaceutical industry to gross domestic product in % Proportion of real value added by the pharma industry in relation to real GDP in % Proportion of nominal value added by the pharma industry in relation to nominal GDP in % Sources: Polynomics, BAK Basel Economics, SFSO. The importance of the pharmaceutical industry for Switzerland 15

18 it significantly above the corresponding growth trend for the overall economy, which reported 1.9 % growth per year. The differences in nominal and real development, and therefore the differences in price pressure, become evident when we consider the relevant shares of value added by the pharmaceutical industry in relation to the overall economy (figure 6). Since 2006, the proportion of real added value to real gross domestic product has, therefore, been higher than the corresponding quota if the development of prices is taken into account. The discrepancy has increased continuously since then. At over 3 %, the quota of real added value in 2010 is one quarter of a percentage point above the nominal quota. Excursus 2 Biotechnology in Switzerland The implementation of findings from biology and biochemistry in the form of technical or technically utilizable elements is referred as biotechnology. In particular, biotechnology includes the commercial use of findings in the fields of molecular biology, virology, microbiology and cell biology. Biotechnology is defined in two ways by the OECD (OECD Biotechnology Statistics 2009). The first definition is: The application of science and technology to living organisms, parts thereof, their products or models, for the purpose of changing living or non-living materials in order to produce knowledge, goods and services. This is a very comprehensive definition which also includes many traditional or conventional activities that do not figure in the current understanding of biotechnology. For this reason, there is a second definition that consists of a list of biotechnological techniques, in order to amplify the existing definition. On the basis of this list, the modern biotechnology industry can be divided into three main areas. Green biotechnology deals in the broadest sense with plants, and is deployed for the production of food and feedstuffs. Red biotechnology deals with the development and production of drugs, for example by modifying bacteria genes so that they can produce basic pharmaceutical substances such as insulin. In white (or gray) genetic engineering, genetically modified micro-organisms are used to increase the profitability and cleanness of industrial production methods as compared to classical manufacturing processes. Biotechnology is a crosssection technology which is mainly deployed in certain sectors agriculture, the pharmaceutical, chemical, agrarian and food industries, medical technology, research and development as well as disposal although it cannot be directly assigned to any one of these sectors. 16 Polynomics / BAK Basel Economics

19 The global financial crisis had a severe impact on the biotech industry in At first glance, turnover data did not suggest any major losses. This is due to the structure of the sector: A few large companies generate the turnover, and they were hardly affected at all by the crisis. However, the influence of the financial crisis is evident if we consider expenditure on research and development, which fell by 21 % as compared to the prior year, according to the 25th Biotech Report by Ernst & Young. The longer-term consequences of these cuts in research expenditure are uncertain, but they give cause for concern. In 2010, expenditure was increased slightly again, by 2 %. This means that the trend appears to have bottomed out. In 2010, turnover growth for listed biotech companies was 8 %, amounting to about USD 84.6 billion. It should be noted here that the acquisition of Genentech by Roche had a major impact on statistics for the sector, and they are only comparable on an adjusted basis. Companies domiciled in the US generate USD 52.6 billion, or over 70 % of global biotech turnover, so they continue to be at the forefront of the worldwide biotech industry. In Switzerland, stable turnover of CHF 9.3 billion was achieved in 2010, corresponding to an 11 % share of global biotech turnover. Against the backdrop of the strengthening Swiss franc, this is a very good result. Profit (of CHF 480 million in this case) was earned for the third year in succession, following 2008 and The number of persons employed in the Swiss biotech industry stagnated in 2010, following major increases in the two preceding years (by almost 16 % in 2009 and 6 % in 2008). Research and development expenditure in 2010 was almost CHF 2.1 billion, maintaining the level of prior years. There were 237 biotech companies in Switzerland as at the end of 2010, most of them located in the Lake Geneva region and in the regions of Zurich and Basel. The concentration of companies in these three clusters is mirrored in terms of financing. The Swiss Venture Capital Database kept by the University of Basel indicates capital flows in various sectors and regions. Between 1999 and 2009 about CHF 2.6 billion of venture capital flowed into biotechnology, accounting for about 45 % of the total volume of venture capital. Sources: Ernst & Young, 2011a und 2011b. 3.2 Importance for other sectors In the same way as for the pharmaceutical industry s role as an employer, it is also possible to determine the added value triggered by orders from the pharmaceutical industry to its input providers in the last year. The relevant multiplier, which is calculated on the basis of the input-output table (cf. section 9) was 2.0 for 2010, or about the same as for 2005 (2.1) or 2006 (2.0). The importance of the pharmaceutical industry for Switzerland 17

20 As table 4 illustrates, orders from the pharmaceutical industry relating to purchases of input products and services triggered an added value volume of almost CHF 15 billion for the relevant sectors. The total direct and indirect added value contribution was, therefore, almost CHF 30 billion, or almost 6 % of Switzerland s total gross domestic product. Table 4 Direct and indirect importance of the pharmaceutical industry in terms of added value, 2010 Direct importance Indirect importance Total Multiplier Gross added value Million CHF 14,800 14,400 29, As % of Switz. total 2.9 % 2.8 % 5.7 % Sources: Polynomics, BAK Basel Economics, SFSO. 18 Polynomics / BAK Basel Economics

21

22 4 Productivity of the pharmaceutical industry 4.1 Productivity per job Productivity is a key figure that indicates the ratio between the number of persons employed and the added value. For decades, the pharmaceutical industry has stood out due to its above-average productivity as compared to the overall economy. As shown in figure 7, nominal productivity per job in the pharmaceutical industry in 2010 was about CHF 400,000, or higher than the value for the overall economy (CHF 112,000) by a factor of 3.6. Between 1990 and 2010, the average annual growth for productivity per job was running at 5.5 %, significantly in excess of the annual increase in productivity for the overall economy (1.8 % p.a.). Hence, the pharmaceutical industry was able to increase its added value earned per job from CHF 137,000 in 1990 to more than CHF 400,000 in The sharp increase occurred mainly from 2000 onwards. Between 2000 and 2010, the average annual growth in nominal productivity per job was 6.5 %. This pleasing development is likely to be due in no small measure to the process of focusing on the core pharmaceutical business that was implemented toward the end of the 1990s. Figure 7 Nominal productivity per job, pharmaceutical industry / overall industry in CHF per employed person 400, , , , , , ,000 50, National economy Pharmaceutical industry Sources: Polynomics, BAK Basel Economics, SFSO. 20 Polynomics / BAK Basel Economics

23 Last year, however, pharmaceutical industry had to accept a decline of 2 % in nominal productivity per job. This was due to the exceptionally heavy expansion of jobs in 2010 and severe price pressure that resulted in an increase in nominal added value of only 1 %. If we consider productivity per job after corrections for price development, the figure for 2010 was easily 1 % above the prior year s value. Excursus 3 Productivity as a central measurement of competitiveness Companies produce goods and provide services which they endeavour to sell at home or abroad. In order to manufacture these goods and services, the companies require capital and labor as the key factors in production. Competitive ability, or competitive edge, among companies is evidenced, not least, by the minimum possible use of these production factors to create a product or service unit as compared to the competitors. The more productive a company is, the more competitive ability it will have. However, productivity is not only a way of measuring a company s competitiveness; it also sets out the framework for payment of the production factors that are utilized. In the long term, for instance, pay increases in a sector are geared to the growth rates for productivity per job or per hour. The central function of productivity as an indicator of competitiveness is also shown in another way: In sectors where competition does not perform the disciplinary function in terms of pricing, the regulators specify increases in efficiency or productivity in order to simulate an as if competition situation. This can be observed, for example, when power markets are opened up. In order to appraise the importance of a company or sector, productivity per job in the pharmaceutical industry is analyzed as part of this study in addition to the job situation and the evolution of added value. 4.2 Added value per hour worked The pharmaceutical industry s productivity per hour is very high in Switzerland. As table 5 illustrates, added value generated per hour in 2010 was CHF 232. This means that the pharmaceutical industry again outstripped the financial sector in terms of hourly productivity last year. The banking sector appears to have stabil ized last year after losses of productivity in the wake of the financial crisis. Between 1995 and 2010, the pharmaceutical industry more than doubled its productivity per hour, from CHF 106 to over CHF 230. In addition to its concentration on the core business towards the end of the 1990s, as already mentioned, the sector was able to increase productivity per hour on a constant basis in re- The importance of the pharmaceutical industry for Switzerland 21

24 cent years. This is likely, not least, to be a reaction to the globally evident trend towards reductions in healthcare expenditure and, therefore, cuts in drug prices. Due to the strict regulation of the pharmaceutical market, an increase in labour productivity is a key instrument in order to secure international competitive edge. Like productivity per job, productivity per hour in 2010 was also below the prior year s level. However, the decline of 1.6 % was less sharp than for product ivity per job (-2.0 %). Table 5 Nominal productivity per hour in selected sectors in CHF per hour worked Pharma Insurance Banking Precision mechanics, optical, watchmaking (Tele)communications Industrial sector Overall economy Sources: Swiss Federal Statistical Office, BAK Basel Economics, SFSO. 22 Polynomics / BAK Basel Economics

25

26 5 The pharmaceutical industry as an export sector The pharmaceutical industry is a sector with a very strong international orientation. A glance at the evolution of exports makes this clear. In 2010, the volume of exports reached a new high of CHF 60.6 billion. Measured as a proportion of total exports, pharmaceutical exports therefore account for 31.4 %, or almost one third. It is particularly pleasing to note that the pharmaceutical industry has dealt very well with the challenge posed by the strong Swiss franc in the last two years, as compared to the overall economy. In 2009, overall exports sustained a real collapse and were almost 13 % below the prior year s level. Pharmaceutical exports, on the other hand, managed to increase by over 5 % despite the unfavourable circumstances. This development yet again makes it clear that the pharmaceutical industry is significantly less susceptible to cyclical economic phenomena than other export sectors. On the other hand, the various healthcare policy reform projects and general political conditions in export countries play a key part. The importance that pharmaceutical exports have acquired for the Swiss economy can be seen from the average annual growth figures. In 1990, for example, Figure 8 Switzerland s pharmaceutical exports and total exports (excluding precious metals) in billion CHF National economy Pharmaceutical industry Sources: Polynomics, BAK Basel Economics, General Directorate for Customs (GDC). 24 Polynomics / BAK Basel Economics

27 pharmaceutical exports totalled CHF 8 billion, and they increased by an average of 10.6 % each year to reach their present level of CHF 60 billion. This growth trend has been well above the trend for overall exports (4.4 % p.a.) for at least the last 20 years. Excursus 4 The strong Swiss franc and the pharmaceutical industry The pharmaceutical industry is an extremely export-oriented sector. Consequently, the value of the Swiss franc plays an important part for the Swiss companies. Since the start of 2009, the franc has appreciated by between 15 % and 20 %, especially in relation to Europe and the USA, the two most important regions for pharmaceutical exports. As for all export-oriented sectors, the strength of the franc poses a major challenge for the pharmaceutical companies. As a direct consequence, income from exported pharmaceutical products falls when converted into Swiss francs. On the other hand, research and production costs incurred in Switzerland change only by the proportion of input goods and services that are imported, and which can now be obtained from abroad more cheaply thanks to the high franc. Other production costs, such as wages, remain unchanged. The consequence of this development is pressure on margins. This pressure can essentially be countered in two ways: by raising prices or by increasing productivity. As a general rule, there is no leeway for pricing in the pharmaceutical industry, as compared to other export sectors. In fact, increasing healthcare expenditure is leading to stricter regulation and decreasing drug prices, developments which step up the pressure on margins even further. The main recourse left to the pharmaceutical industry as a result of the high franc is, therefore, a continuous increase in productivity in order to combat the losses of income due to the currency s strength. The sustained strength of the franc against the US dollar and the euro had a strong impact on foreign trade in the first months of Nominal cumulative exports from January 2011 until May 2011 showed a growth rate of barely 1 %, placing them slightly ahead of the previous year s level; in real terms, however, a sharp increase of 10 % was measured. The prices calculated by the General Directorate for Customs for the export of pharmaceutical products fell by about 8.5 %. Nevertheless, the monthly progression appears to suggest a recovery of prices, and the decline in May (2.6 %) was no longer as severe as in the first months of the year. These results suggest that the pharmaceutical industry will again achieve an excellent export result in the current year. The importance of the pharmaceutical industry for Switzerland 25

28 6 Estimate of tax revenue and consumer spending In addition to the economic interdependencies at company level, other parties also benefit from the economic strength of the pharmaceutical industry: the state, as the recipient of tax, the employees, as recipients of wages and salaries, and the manufacturers of consumer goods and providers of personal services. One possible way of calculating these effects would be to form comprehensive multipliers. However, such multipliers tend to overestimate the importance of a sector because in the case of wages and salaries, for example the social security system ensures that replacement income is available if a job is lost. A failure of the pharma ceutical industry would therefore have less drastic effects on the income of employees than on the companies. By way of example, we shall examine wages and how they are used. Total payroll expenditure by the pharmaceutical industry in 2008 was about CHF 3.8 billion, corresponding to almost 30 % of the added value earned. Measured as a proportion of wages and salaries in the overall economy, pharmaceutical pay accounts for 1 %. If this figure is compared with the quota of employees, which is 0.8 %, it can be seen that the pharmaceutical industry pays above-average wages and salaries. In actual fact, average pay in the Swiss pharmaceutical industry in 2008 was CHF 9,000 per month, or over 30 % more than the average for the overall economy of CHF 6,900 per month. Two effects are responsible for these higher average pay rates. First, the pharmaceutical industry has proportionately more employees with a university or college education (26 % vs. 19 % in the overall economy) and fewer with basic secondary school education (16 % vs. 21 % in the overall economy). Second, the pharmaceutical industry pays higher wages within the respective educational categories. Due to the higher wages and salaries paid on average by the pharmaceutical industry, employees in the industry pay out more money for taxes and in terms of consumer spending. Of the pharmaceutical industry s payroll total, about 10 % is transferred to the state. The equivalent amount for the overall economy is only about 7.5 %. In 2008, the revenue from tax and charges generated by persons employed in the pharmaceutical industry was about CHF 370 million, corresponding to about 1.3 % of the revenue from persons employed in the economy as a whole. A person employed in the pharmaceutical industry therefore transfers an average of some CHF 10,500 to the government in taxes and other charges. An average employee provides about CHF 6,200 in taxes and charges. The contribution from an employee in the pharmaceutical industry is therefore about 70 % higher than the national average. 26 Polynomics / BAK Basel Economics

29 Despite higher taxes, the higher salaries paid in the pharmaceutical industry mean that the average consumer spending of a person employed in the pharma ceutical industry is CHF 98,000, or still almost 30 % above the figure for an average employed person, which is CHF 76,000. Accordingly, consumer spending by pharmaceutical employees in 2008 totaled about CHF 3 billion, accounting for about 1 % of consumer spending by all persons in employment. The heavy concentration of pharmaceutical companies in regions close to borders, e.g. within the Basel economic region, means that a relatively large number of cross-border commuters is included among the persons employed in this sector. It is estimated that about 20 % of employees have their place of residence in neighbouring countries. It follows that the figures for taxes and consumer spending should be regarded as upper limits, since cross-border commuters pay tax on and spend part of their income abroad. The importance of the pharmaceutical industry for Switzerland 27

30 7 Summary This updated study of the macroeconomic importance of the pharmaceutical industry for Switzerland presents the latest results available on the basis of updated data sources. The main purpose of what is now the fourth edition of this study is to remedy the ongoing deficiency in official statistics, which means that virtually no data are available on the pharmaceutical industry. This study provides additional statistical data, and indicates both the direct and indirect importance of the pharmaceutical industry for the Swiss economy. The main results from the study are summarized in table 6. Employment growth in the pharmaceutical industry continues to maintain a very high level. The average growth in the number of people employed in the pharmaceutical industry is over 3 % per year, and there was almost no slowdown in this rate during the recent economic crisis. Some 36,700 persons were employed in the pharmaceutical industry in This means that the industry is developing into an ever more important employer for Switzerland. The pharmaceutical industry s proportion of employed persons in the overall economy rose from 0.5 % to 0.8 % between 1990 and The number of hours worked presents a similar picture: Growth in the volume of work in the pharmaceutical industry between 1990 and 2010 was almost 3 %. In 2010, however, the industry s proportion of hours worked in the overall economy was higher than the proportion of persons employed, at 0.85 %. This is because part-time working is not so widespread in the pharmaceutical industry (among men as well as women) as in the rest of the economy, and the number of hours worked per person employed is therefore higher. The structure of persons employed in the pharmaceutical industry shows a high level of full-time employees, and an above-average international composition. Almost two thirds of the employees are of foreign nationality, and the majority of these originate from the countries bordering Switzerland, namely Germany, France and Italy. One of the reasons for this situation is the large number of cross-border commuters employed in the metropolitan region of Basel. Another significant portion of the employees, comprising about 10 % to 12 %, originate from countries that are not neighbours of Switzerland, with British and US citizens accounting for the largest shares. In order to provide its products, the pharmaceutical industry needs not only labour and the capital that it makes available itself, but also other inputs in the form of goods and services from other sectors. These sector interdependencies can be shown in the form of an input-output table on the basis of which it is pos- 28 Polynomics / BAK Basel Economics

31 Table 6 Direct importance of the pharmaceutical industry Persons Employed 22,900 27,100 31,700 33,200 33,900 34,800 35,600 36,700 As % of the overall economy 0.6 % 0.7 % 0.7 % 0.8 % 0.8 % 0.8 % 0.8 % 0.8 % Added value, nominal In million CHF 4,200 5,800 9,600 11,300 12,600 13,700 14,600 14,800 As % of the overall economy 1.2 % 1.5 % 2.2 % 2.4 % 2.6 % 2.7 % 2.9 % 2.9 % Productivity In CHF per person employed 183, , , , , , , ,200 Overall economy 89,300 96, , , , , , ,500 In CHF per hour worked Overall economy Exports In million CHF 11,970 22,070 39,790 46,620 51,140 55,270 58,180 60,640 As % of total exports 13.0 % 17.4 % 26.3 % 26.3 % 25.9 % 26.8 % 32.2 % 31.4 % Sources: Polynomics, BAK Basel Economics, SFSO, General Directorate for Customs (GDC). sible to calculate the added value and employment impact of one sector on the rest of the economy. Effects calculated in this manner are known as multipliers (cf. table 7 on this aspect). As regards jobs and volume of work, the multipliers are 3.7 and 3.6 respectively; these are higher than the added value multiplier on account of the pharmaceutical industry s above-average productivity. In other words, alongside the 36,700 persons employed in the pharmaceutical industry, there are a further 98,600 persons in other sectors who benefited from demand created by the pharmaceutical industry in 2010, corresponding to a quota of some 2.2 % of persons employed in the economy as a whole. Another indicator that allows us to measure the importance of an economic sector is added value. It is evident that the growth of nominal gross added value in the pharmaceutical industry is above the average. Whereas the pharmaceutical The importance of the pharmaceutical industry for Switzerland 29

32 Table 7 Direct and indirect importance of the pharmaceutical industry, 2010 Direct importance Indirect importance Total Multiplier Gross added value Million CHF 14,800 14,400 29, As % of Switz. total 2.9 % 2.8 % 5.7 % Persons employed Number of persons 36,700 98, , As % of Switz. total 0.8 % 2.2 % 3.0 % Hours worked Million hours As % of Switz. total 0.9 % 2.2 % 3.1 % Sources: Polynomics, BAK Basel Economics, SFSO. industry s nominal gross added value grew by a factor of almost six between 1990 and 2010 (with an increase from CHF 2.7 billion to CHF 14.8 billion), the nominal gross domestic product grew by only a factor of 1.63 %. There has been a particularly marked increase in the growth of nominal added value in the pharmaceutical industry since the year Over the last ten years, this figure rose by a total of 150 %, or by an average of 10 % per year. Except in 2010, growth always exceeded the rate for the overall economy. However, high pressure on prices has now resulted in an increase in nominal added value of only 1 % as compared to the prior year, whereas the comparative value for the overall economy is 2 %. Nevertheless, viewed in real terms, the pharmaceutical industry (at 4.3 %) continues to report higher growth than the overall economy (2.5 %). A multiplier of about 2 is obtained for gross added value in the pharmaceutical industry. This means that the indirect effect of the pharmaceutical industry on Switzerland s nominal gross domestic product in 2010 was about CHF 14.4 billion. The total direct and indirect importance of the pharmaceutical industry for the national economy is, therefore, about CHF 29.2 billion, equating to a quota of 5.7 % of the country s gross domestic product. Another reason for the pressure on prices is that the pharmaceutical industry is an extremely export-oriented sector. The value of the Swiss franc therefore plays an especially important part in terms of nominal added value. The franc has gained between 15 % and 20 % in value against the currencies in the two key pharmaceutical export regions of Europe and the US since 2009, and this poses a major challenge for the pharmaceutical corporations. The direct consequence is that if prices in foreign currencies remain constant, there is a decrease in income after conversion into Swiss francs. On the other hand, production costs 30 Polynomics / BAK Basel Economics

33 incurred in Switzerland change only by that portion of the input goods and services that are imported and which thanks to the high franc can now be purchased more cheaply from other countries. Other production costs, such as wages, remain unchanged. The consequence of this development is pressure on margins, which is reflected over the short term in falling profits and therefore has a direct impact on nominal added value. One key way of measuring a sector s competitiveness is productivity. Productivity measures the companies use of capital and labor to manufacture their products. Efficient utilization of these production factors leads to high competitive ability, or competitive edge. In the long term, pay increases in a given sector are geared to the growth rates for productivity per job or per hour. In terms of labour productivity, the pharmaceutical industry far outstrips the economy as whole. The pharmaceutical industry reports significantly higher prod uctivity than the overall economy, as regards productivity per job and per hour. With added value in excess of CHF 400,000 per person employed, or CHF 232 per hour worked, the pharmaceutical industry was more than three times as productive as the overall Swiss average in Together with the banks and insurance companies, it ranks among Switzerland s most productive sectors, leaving other productive sectors such as precision mechanics, optical and watch making or telecommunications far behind. The Swiss pharmaceutical industry is a heavily export-oriented sector. The vast majority of goods manufactured in the Swiss pharmaceutical industry is exported. Since 1990, the proportion of pharmaceutical exports to total exports by the overall Swiss economy grew from 10 % to 31 %. In 2010 alone, the value of goods exported by the Swiss pharmaceutical industry was CHF 60.6 billion. Further significant ways in which the pharmaceutical industry influences Switzerland s national economy become apparent if we consider wages and salaries, tax and consumer spending. The average salary in the pharmaceutical industry of CHF 9,000 per month (in 2008) was more than 30 % above the average for the economy as a whole (CHF 6,900 per month). Reasons for this include the higher level of qualifications among the industry s employees. 26 % of pharmaceutical employees have a university or college education a significantly higher level than the Swiss average (19 %). Tax expenditure and consumer spending by persons employed in the pharmaceutical industry are also higher, due to the sector s above-average pay levels. Revenue from taxes and charges from persons em- The importance of the pharmaceutical industry for Switzerland 31

34 ployed in the pharmaceutical industry in 2008 was about CHF 370 million, corresponding to about 1.3 % of the total revenue generated by employees in the overall economy. All in all, a person employed in the pharmaceutical industry transfers about 70 % more taxes and charges to the state than an average employee. Finally, due to the sector s higher salaries, consumer spending by persons employed in the pharmaceutical industry is more than 25 % above the figure for those employed in the overall economy. In 2008, consumer spending by pharmaceutical employees totalled some CHF 3.0 billion, corresponding to about 1 % of consumer spending by employees in the economy as a whole. 32 Polynomics / BAK Basel Economics

35

36 8 Annex 1: Demarcation of sectors This study has determined the direct and indirect importance of the pharmaceutical industry. The reason why a separate study is required in order to determine, in particular, the direct importance of the pharmaceutical industry in relation to the national economy is that in Switzerland the official production and added value statistics do not report the pharmaceutical industry separately. As a result of structural change and technological development, new economic activities are constantly coming into being, or weightings among existing economic sectors are shifted. Consequently, an existing statistical classification of the current economic structure often ceases to be adequate. The pharmaceutical industry offers one example of a shift of this sort. The molecular biology revolution after the World War 2 was a key factor in shaping the development of the modern pharmaceutical industry. Thanks to the change in the knowledge base, therapeutic concepts were no longer created as a result of chance discoveries, but as the outcome of the rational development of pharmaceutical products. The basis for this transition was provided by new findings in molecular biochemistry, pharmacology and enzymology during the 1970s, when genetic engineering reached its first peak. However, current official statistical evaluations in Switzerland do not (yet) take account of these developments. Consequently, the pharmaceutical industry continues to be treated as part of the chemical-pharmaceutical industry in the economic classification systems maintained by official bodies. In Switzerland, in fact, it is merely reported as the chemical industry (cf. figure 9 on this point). In Switzerland, unlike many other countries, the official statistics on added value and employment in the economic sectors do not report data on economic groups, and therefore do not include any data for the pharmaceutical industry. This state of affairs no longer gives any consideration whatsoever to the differences in the development of individual economic groups within the chemicalpharmaceutical industry in Switzerland over recent years. For the purposes of the present analysis of the pharmaceutical industry, BAK Basel Economics and Polynomics therefore created a body of statistical data which takes account of the aforementioned changes: In terms of economic statistics, the chemical-pharmaceutical industry (economic division ) was split into its individual components so that the key economic indicators of added value, numbers of persons employed and hours worked are now available for 34 Polynomics / BAK Basel Economics

37 Figure 9 Sectoral demarcation of the pharmaceutical industry as per NOGA 2002 Demarcation of sectors in the official industrial classification system Section D Subsection DG Division 24 Group 24.1 Group 24.2 Group 24.3 Group 24.4 Group 24.5 Group 24.6 Group 24.7 Manufacture of goods and products Manufacture of chemical products Manufacture of chemical products Manufacture of basic chemical substances Manufacture of plant protection products and other agrochemical products Manufacture of paints and other coating materials, printing inks and putties Manufacture of pharmaceutical products Manufacture of soaps, washing and cleaning products, odorants and bodycare/personal care products Manufacture of other chemical products Manufacture of chemical fibers Sources: SFSO. the pharmaceutical industry (as an economic group ). The underlying data were expanded in relation to the previous studies dated 2005, 2007 and 2009 by adding corresponding data up to the current (2010) status, with revisions as appropriate, so there may be some discrepancies in respect of individual indicators as compared with values in previous studies. The Swiss Federal Statistical Office is reacting to structural developments in the Swiss economy by means of the NOGA (General Classification of Economic Activities) 2008 which has been in force since January This new classification offers distinct advantages for the pharmaceutical industry in particular. As figure 9 shows, the pharmaceutical industry was a subgroup of the Manufacture of chemical products division according to NOGA Since data for certain indicators are collected and published only at divisional level, this means that indicators for individual subgroups (such as the pharmaceutical industry) have to be estimated, which always entails uncertainties. In NOGA 2008, the pharmaceutical industry has now been promoted to the level of division, in recognition of its economic importance. More up-to-date and accurate data on the pharmaceutical industry will be available in the future as a result of this step. The importance of the pharmaceutical industry for Switzerland 35

38 9 Annex 2: Methods The identification of indirect effects is based on the determination of multipliers. This approach is suitable for indicating, within a past period, the influence that a given sector has exerted on other sectors due to its demand. The following sections contain, first, a description of the concept of sectoral interdependencies (the input-output table) on which the calculations are based (section 9.1), followed by a presentation of the actual calculation of the multipliers in section Input-output table The basis for the analyses that were undertaken is provided by a schematic representation of the Swiss national economy. Flows of goods within the overall economy can be portrayed with the help of an input-output table. On the one hand, such a table illustrates the supplies of goods flowing between the sectors. On the other, an interdependency matrix of this sort also makes it possible to represent the final consumption of the goods produced, including the associated import quota. Figure 10 shows a schematic input-output table. The horizontal axis shows the use of the goods manufactured in the sectors. These goods either flow into other sectors as input goods, or are consumed, invested or exported directly as final demand. From this perspective, the interdependency matrix shows what amounts of goods produced by one sector are supplied to other sectors. The sum of final demand and input goods/services gives the total volume of goods. As well as the relationships between input goods/services and final demand already mentioned, the input-output table also allows a second type of analysis. Based on the interdependencies, it is possible in the vertical dimension to deduce which and how many goods a sector requires as input goods for its production. If the added value for the sector is then added, the gross production value of a sector is obtained. The sum of the gross production value and the imports again gives the total volume of goods. With the help of the interdependency matrix, it is possible to examine the influence on the entire economy of an increase in demand for goods from a given sector. Due to the interdependency in connection with input goods, the additional demand for goods triggers further production increases in other sectors. The sum of all these effects can be calculated with the help of an input-output model, and it corresponds to the multiplier for the total volume of goods. 36 Polynomics / BAK Basel Economics

39 Figure 10 Structure of an input-output table Utilization side Sectors Generation side Goods / Sectors Input-output matrix Inputs Final demand Household consumption State consumption Investments Exports Volume of goods + = Imports = Gross production Input goods and services + Added value = Gross production + Imports = Volume of goods Sources: Polynomics. 9.2 Calculation of multipliers Multipliers can be calculated in several ways, and also for several economic variables. For example, there are goods-related multipliers for the total volume of goods in a national economy, the production value or the added value. However, it is also possible to calculate multipliers based on labour market variables such as the number of employees, the hours worked or the payroll costs. The level of a multiplier and hence the determination of the sector s overall importance for the national economy are related, among other factors, to the choice of method for calculating the multiplier. In general terms, a distinction may be drawn between two different multipliers: multipliers of type I and type II. These multipliers differ as regards the demarcation of their effect. Whereas type I multipliers are restricted to the additional effects arising from the input goods, the type II multiplier reintegrates the income generated for private individuals and companies into the cycle. Hence, a type I multiplier includes the direct and indirect effects of a sector on the national economy, whereas the type II multiplier in addition includes what are known as the induced effects. The importance of the pharmaceutical industry for Switzerland 37

40 The common feature of both multipliers is that they reproduce the effects within the national economy at a specified point in time, and are therefore of a static nature. Dynamic adaptation processes due to changes in demand are only taken into account on a limited basis. This static analysis is particularly problematic in the case of type II multipliers. It is assumed here that consumers and employees do not adapt to a change in income or in the job situation. The accusation that adaptations are not taken into account can also be levelled at multipliers of type I, but because sectoral structures change much more sluggishly, this aspect is less important. For these reasons, the present study only makes use of the type I multiplier. The induced effects are analyzed separately on the basis of salary and consumption considerations (cf. section 6). There are several methods of measuring the indirect importance of a sector in accordance with a type I multiplier; all of them are based on input-output tables, but they differ as regards their complexity. A specific distinction may be drawn between: inputoutput models, structural econometric models, and general equilibrium models. Input-output models Input-output models are used most frequently to determine the indirect effects. The advantage of these models is that they can easily be understood and communicated. Moreover, they are based on effective interdependencies among the sectors. However, these advantages are counterbalanced by some drawbacks: Input-output models are static models, so the time dimension is neglected. In particular, it is not possible to take account of reactions to changes in demand on the part of companies and consumers. Multipliers based on input-output models are able to measure the indirect importance of a sector at a specified point in time, but they do not permit any conclusions regarding the evolution of a sector s importance over time. Structural econometric models As compared to simple input-output models, structural econometric models contain more information about the economic context, because they are not based on a reporting year but, instead, take account of historical changes in the interdependencies among the sectors. At least at the level of the national economy, they are able to map productivity increases and the substitution between labour and capital because they take account of relative changes in salaries and prices. Structural models also make it possible to represent simple adaptations of sector structures after a change in demand, in which case the adaptations are based on historical behaviour patterns. 38 Polynomics / BAK Basel Economics

41 General equilibrium models The third option for calculating the indirect importance of a sector is based on general equilibrium models. In this case, decisions by companies and consumers are modelled explicitly: they attempt to maximize their profit or benefit over time. Thanks to this comprehensive modelling approach, reactions by companies and consumers to increases in demand are more subtly differentiated than in a simple input-output model. The importance of a sector can be analyzed more accurately. As in the case of structural models, it is also possible in this case to track reactions over time. On the other hand, the modelling outlay is greater for this type. Moreover, it is very difficult to communicate the results from the models because the complexity of general equilibrium models is high, and the necessary assumptions regarding maximization of benefit and profit can be of decisive significance. Comparison of added value multipliers Table 8 reproduces the calculated multipliers for severals input-output and structural economic models. The gross value added multiplier for the pharmaceutical industry of the BAK sector model is about 2.1 and therefore slighly higher than the input-output model multiplier of 2.0. The multiplier effect on gross added value in Germany during 2008 is 1.8, which is rather lower than in Switzerland and also lower than the 2006 value for Germany. In 2008, one euro earned in the pharmaceutical industry increased added value in Germany by an additional 80 cents. International studies on the importance of the pharmaceutical industry The influence of the pharmaceutical industry on the national economy as a whole is also analyzed in other countries. Several of these studies are summarized below. Table 8 Comparison of added value multipliers for the pharmaceutical industry Calculation method Gross added value Switzerland: input-output model (2001 / 2006 / 2008) Switzerland: BAK sector model Germany: input-output model (2000 / 2005) Sources: Polynomics, BAK Basel Economics, DESTATIS, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, SFSO. The importance of the pharmaceutical industry for Switzerland 39

42 For the United States, there is a current study by Archstone Consulting (2009): The Biopharmaceutical Sector s Impact on the U.S. Economy, which follows on from work by the Milken Institute (2004). For 2006, these authors obtained multipliers of 3.3 for gross added value and 4.7 for employment. These multipliers are comparatively high, because the study takes account of the induced effects in addition to direct and indirect effects. If the induced effects are disregarded, significantly lower multipliers are obtained. For real added value, the figure is still 2.0 and for the number of persons employed, it is 2.5. For 2003, the analysis by the Milken Institute (2004), Biopharmaceutical Industry Contributions to State and U.S. Economics produced multipliers with and without induced effects of 2.7 and 2.1 respectively for gross added value, and 4.5 and 3.0 respectively for employment. This suggests that the induced effects increased between the two reporting periods, for gross added value as well as employment, whereas the indirect effects remained virtually constant as regards added value but decreased in respect of employment. In Scotland, the study by Ewen Peters Associates (2006), Contribution of Pharma-Related Business Activity to the Scottish Economy, compiled on behalf of the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI), also takes account of direct, indirect and induced effects. This study is based on an inputoutput table for 2003 and it uses a type II multiplier of 1.6 for added value as well as employment. According to our own calculations (cf. Polynomics, 2009), the values for the multipliers in Germany, including induced effects and on the basis of the inputoutput table published for 2005, amount to 2.1 for added value and 3.0 for employment. The added value multiplier is still 1.5 if the induced effects are disregarded. A figure of 1.8 is obtained for the employment multiplier in this case. The study by Weiss et al. (2004), Die pharmazeutische Industrie im gesamtwirtschaftlichen Kontext: Ausstrahlung auf Produktion und Beschäftigung in den Zulieferbranchen [ The pharmaceutical industry in the macroeconomic context: impact on production and employment in the supplier sectors ] focused only on the direct and indirect effects of the pharmaceutical industry. The updated version of this study in 2005 (Weiss et al., 2005), based on adjusted employment figures, identifies added value multipliers of 1.7 for 1995 and 1.8 for 2000 and For the employment multiplier, Weiss et al. (2004, 2005) obtain a value of 1.9 for 1995 and 2000, and a value of 2.0 for This means that the type I multipliers in Germany showed virtually no changes between 1995 and For the gross 40 Polynomics / BAK Basel Economics

43 Table 9 Overview of international studies on the pharmaceutical industry US Type I Type II Archstone Consulting (2009) 2006 Gross added value Persons employed Milken Institute (2004) 2003 Gross added value Persons employed Scotland Ewen Peters Associates (2006) 2003 Gross added value 1.6 Persons employed 1.6 Germany Weiss et al. (2004) 1995 Gross added value 1.7 Persons employed Gross added value 1.8 Persons employed 1.9 Weiss et al. (2005) 2002 Gross added value 1.8 Persons employed 2.0 Polynomics (2009) 2005 Gross added value Persons employed added value, the indirect effects declined somewhat after a slightly higher figure at the start of the new millennium, whereas they remained constant in respect of employment. The referenced studies are based on input-output analyses. Weiss et al. (2004), like Ewen Peters Associates (2006), base themselves directly on the official inputoutput tables of the national statistical agencies. The Milken Institute (2004), on the other hand, uses a regional economic model (RIMS II: Regional Input/Output Modeling System) produced by the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), a US governmental agency. The RIMS includes prestandardized multiplier analyses for all the American states. The multipliers calculated here are summarized in table 9. The importance of the pharmaceutical industry for Switzerland 41

44 10 List of sources Archstone Consulting (2009): The Biopharmaceutical Sectors Impact on the U.S. Economy, Archstone Consulting, Stamford, CT. DESTATIS (2009): Volkswirtschaftliche Gesamtrechnungen: Input-Output-Rechnung 2005, Fachserie 18, Reihe 2, Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland [ National accounts: input-output account 2005, specialist series 18, line 2, Federal Statistical Office of Germany], Wiesbaden. Ewen Peters Associates (2006): Contribution of Pharma-Related Business Activity to the Scottish Economy, Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI), Edinburgh. Nathani, Carsten, Schmid, Christian, und van Nieuwkoop, Renger (2011): Schätzung einer Input-Output-Tabelle der Schweiz 2008, Schlussbericht an das Bundesamt für Statistik [Estimated input-output table for Switzerland, 2008, final report to the Swiss Federal Statistical Office], Rüschlikon, Berne. Milken Institute (2004): Biopharmaceutical Industry Contributions to State and U.S. Economics, Milken Institute, Santa Monica, CA. Ernst & Young (2011a): Beyond Borders: The Global Biotechnology Report Ernst & Young (2011b): Swiss Biotech Report Metrobasel (2011): metrobasel economic report, Basel. OECD (2009): OECD Biotechnology Statistics 2009, OECD, Paris. Polynomics (2009): Die Wirkung des Breitbandausbaus auf Arbeitsplätze und die deutsche Volkswirtschaft, New York, Olten. Weiss, Jörg-Peter, Raab, Stephan, und Schintke, Joachim (2004): Die pharmazeutische Industrie im gesamtwirtschaftlichen Kontext: Ausstrahlung auf Produktion und Beschäftigung in den Zulieferbranchen, Politikberatung kompakt [ The pharmaceutical industry in the macroeconomic context: impact on production and employment in the supplier sectors, compact policy advisory ], in Weekly Report 6/2005, Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung [German Institute for Economic Research] (DIW), Berlin. 42 Polynomics / BAK Basel Economics

45 Weiss, Jörg-Peter, Raab, Stephan, und Schintke, Joachim (2005): Demand for Pharmaceuticals Impact on Production and Employment in Nearly Every Sector of the Economy, Politikberatung kompakt [compact policy advisory] 4, Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung [German Institute for Economic Research] (DIW), Berlin. The importance of the pharmaceutical industry for Switzerland 43

46

47

48 Interpharma Petersgraben 35, P.O. Box CH-4003 Basel Phone +41 (0) Fax +41 (0)