EUKN EGTC Policy Lab

Transcription

1 EUKN EGTC Policy Lab Sustainable Neighborhood Ranking Systems Luxembourg June 30,

2 What makes a sustainable neighborhood? 2

3 What makes a sustainable neighborhood? Priorities of sustainability can vary widely from place to place 3

4 Highlighted urban development systems 4

5 LEED for Neighborhood Development United States; Certified by Green Building Certification Institute (GBCI) Piloted in 2007; Launched in 2010; Most recent version prerequisites; 5 themes; 44 criteria Most extensively used urban development scale system Green Star for Communities Australia; Certified by Green Star Launched as pilot in prerequisites; 5 themes; 37 criteria Casbee for Urban Development Japan; Certified by Institute for Built Environment & Energy Conservation (IBEC) Launched in 2006; Most recent version prerequisites; 6 themes; 31 criteria; 82 sub-criteria BREEAM for Communities United Kingdom; Certified by Building Research Establishment (BRE) Launched in 2008; Most recent version prerequisites; 5 themes; 40 criteria DGNB for Urban Districts Germany; Certified by DGNB Launched in 2011; Most recent version prerequisites; 5 themes; 14 sub-themes; 45 criteria HQE for Urban Planning and Development France; Certified by Certivea Launched in 2011; Most recent version 2013 Primarily a Project Management system; no certification scheme 5

6 Commonalities in Neighborhood Ranking Systems Organisational structure Comes out of a building level certification Ratings are ranked through some sort of point system Independent/Organisational review Application costs associated with various phases of certification Location-specific in most cases Common considerations (themes & criteria) Common themes Transportation and mobility Community life/neighborhood dynamics Impact on the natural environment Economic development (some) Use of innovation (some) Governance(some) Design (some) 6

7 LEED: 238 registered, 146 certified Certified Pre-certified Registered Pilot 50 0 HQE-A LEED BREEAM AQUA DGNB Green StarCasbee 7

8 Certifications levels 8

9 General Comparisons While LEED ND is the oldest system, they were all launched within the past 10 years. Order of maturity: LEED, HQE, BREEAM, DGNB, Casbee, Green Star (pilot stage) LEED, DGNB, Casbee focus on projects starting in the design phase; HQE is the only system beginning at project conception (certification of preliminary phases) LEED, BREEAM and DGNB offer intermediate phases for precertification (in recognition of being on the right track, and marketing purposes) LEED is only system to allow retroactive certification (up to 3 years after completion) HQE and Green Star are only systems without prerequisites Green Star and Casbee are the only certifications that expire on 5 year cycles, with an option to renew 9

10 Key Assessment Comparisons The schemes "with criteria" have on average 5 themes/40 criteria. Common themes: Economy - Governance - Environment/Health - Technical/Infrastructure/Transportation/Mobility - Process/Design HQE and Casbee have no prerequisites: the most "inclusive" systems LEED and BREEAM are the schemes which have the most "filters" (12 prerequisites) BREEAM and Green Star offer an optional "bonus" category specifically for "Innovation" LEED also has an "Innovation" category and is the only one to offer a "Regional Priority" theme Casbee is the most technical system, and heavily based on criteria specific to Japan s urban context LEED, BREEAM and Casbee are the only ones with a system for weighting, depending on the priority themes for projects LEED, BREEAM and Green Star offer accreditation for professionals. The LEED and Green Star schemes offer extra points when an accredited professional is present. 10

11 LEED for Neighborhood Development Number of criteria according to themes, to the number of points and to the prerequisites Localisation Smart "intelligente" links and et localisation réseaux 28 R R R R R R 1 Prérequis Modèle Neighbourhood de quartier model et conception and design 41 R R R 1 Critère Infrastructures Green infrastructure et bâtiments and buildings verts 31 R R R R Innovation Innovation et processus and the design conception process 6 Propriétés Regional régionales properties 4 Thèmes Themes pts Nombre de critères 11

12 LEED-ND in practice Northwest Gardens, Ft Lauderdale, FL, USA The Shipyard/Candlestick Point, San Francisco, CA, USA Mixed income multi-family housings, a gridded street network, communitiy gardens, energy efficiency. Housing, retail, commercial, cultural, leisure and educational uses. 12

13 BREEAM Communities 1 Phase 1: Selection of the development principle 1 Interim certification 2 Phase 2: Drawing the site plan 3 Phase 3: Detailed design 2 Final certification Economic Development Développement économique Gouvernance Governance 88 R R Economie Local economy locale 55 R Bien-être Social well-being social R Conditions Environmental environnementales conditions R R Ressources Resources and et Energie Energy 31 R R R R Prerequisite Pré-requis Criteria Critère applicable in en Phase Phase 1 1 Criteria Critère applicable in en Phase 2 2 Criteria Critère applicable in en Phase 3 3 Usages Land des sols use and et écologie ecology 18 R R Transportation Transports and et mobilité mobility 15 R Thèmes Themes pts Number Nombre of criteria de critères 13

14 BREEAM Communities in practice Masthusen, Malmö, Sweden Sheffield Housing Corporation, United Kingdom Multifunctional hub, active routes, public spaces. 3 sites with 2,300 new homes for sale and rent on 60 hectares of land over the next 15 years 14

15 DGNB Urban Quarters Qualité envrionnementale Environmental quality R R R ENV10 ENV20 ENV20 R 1 Prérequis Qualité Economic économique quality Qualité sociale Social and et fonctionnelle functional quality ECO10 ECO20 R SCO10 SCO20 SCO30 SCO40 1 Critère Sous-thème Qualité Technical technique quality R TEC10 TEC20 TEC30 Qualité du Process processus quality Thèmes Themes pts R PRO10 PRO20 PRO Nombre Number of de criteria critères 15

16 DGNB Urban Quarters in practice Le Quartier Central, Dusseldorf, Germany Nordhavn, Denmark Urban mix of housing, jobs, shopping and leisure. Sustainable energy supply, lowenergy building, public transport and cycling. 16

17 HQE Urban Planning and Development SPM phases Primary deliverables at each phase Stages in the certification process Launch Initial analysis Selection of objectives Setting up a sponsorship structure Formalisation of the planner-local government joint involvement Participation specifications Setting up the multi-disciplinary team Initial diagnostic and summary Analysis of the regulatory framework and regional policies Overview of the preliminary participation Reasoning for the relevance of the project Sustainable development objectives charter 1 2 Application/ admissibility study/ proposal/contract Transmission of the Operational Tracking Dossier/nursing Initial auditon site before the work starts (unless waived): Phases 1 to 4: End of phase 2 to 4 (unless waived) 4 5 Project design Implementation Schedule, Site plan, Schedule for actions, Design selection Integration plan Justification for the sustainable development objectives Requirements for buildings, public and private spaces and facilities: regulatory, contractual or informational documents Worksite management plan Buyer and user awareness 3 Transmission of the Operational Tracking Dossier/nursing Yearly follow-up audits on site Transmission of the Operational Tracking Dossier/nursing Phases 4 and 5 6 Overview - Capitalisation Project sheet Overview Measurement of performance 4 Final audit Phase 6 17

18 CASBEE Urban Development Natural environment Envrionnement naturel Functionality Fonction of de services for pour the designated l'espace désigné space QUD1.1 QUD1.1 QUD1.2 QUD1.3 QUD1.4 QUD1.5 QUD2.1 QUD2.2 QUD2.3 QUD2.4 QUD Sous-critère 1 Critère Contribution à la communauté locale Contribution to the community QUD QUD3.3 QUD4.4 QUD3.4 Environmental Impact impact envrionnemental on the micro sur climate, le on microclimat, building façades les and façades on the et landscape le paysage LRUD1.1 LRUD1.1 LRUD1.2 LRUD1.3 LRUD1.4 LRUD1.5 LRUD1.6 Infrastructures sociales Social infrastructure LRUD2.1 LRUD2.2 LRUD2.3 LRUD2.4 LRUD2.5 LRUD2.6 Management Gestion de of l'envrionnement the local environment local Thèmes LRUD3.1 LRUD3.2 LRUD3.3 LRUD Number Nombre of criteria de critères 18

19 Casbee Urban Development in practice Laketown Miwa no Mori Harumi Triton Square Energy efficient houses surrouned by ecosystems for indigenous species. Environment friendly community with clear zoning and energy saving systems. 19

20 Green Star Communities Gouvernance Governance 21 Conception Design 11 1 Critère Habitabilité Liveability 23 Prospérité Economic économique prosperity 19 Environnement Environment 26 Innovation Thèmes Themes pts Number Nombre of criteria de critères 20

21 Green Star Communities in practice Paramatta Square, Paramatta, Australia Vibrant, connected and liveable city. The Loop District, Canberra, Australia Socially, economically and environmentally sustainable community. 21

22 APPENDIX SLIDES 22

23 LEED for Neighborhood Development Green Star for Communities Casbee for Urban Development BREEAM for Communities DGNB for Urban Districts HQE for Urban Planning and Development Technical manuals, detailed research, background information, and all presentations from this workshop can be found after this conference on EUKN s website: 23

24 Comparison of the certified phases in the different certification procedures AQUA LEED BREEAM DGNB Green Star CASBEE CERTIVEA France Brazil United States Great Britain Germany Australia Japan Certification process Phase 1: Launch Phase 1: Launch Phase 2: Initial analysis HQE-A certification Phase 3: Selecting the objectives HQE-A certification Phase 4: Project design HQE-A certification Phase 5: Implementation Phase 2: Initial analysis Phase 3: Selecting the objectives AQUA-BL programming certification Phase 4: Project design AQUA-BL design certification Phase 5: Implementation SLL: Review of the prerequisites (optional) Stage 1: Plan approved subject to conditions Stage 2: Pre-certified plan Phase 1: Selection of the development principle Intermediate certificate Phase 2: Drawing the site plan Phase 1: Pre-certification Valid for 3 years Phase 2: Infrastructure Certification Valid for 5 years No clearly indicated process Submission of the documents required for the assessment Simple assessment on the points grid Green Star for Communities certification must be obtained 3 years after registration Certification renewed every 5 years No clearly indicated process Assessment on the analysis and points grid Casbee UD certification is valid for 5 years HQE-A certification Phase 3: Detailed design Phase 6: Overview- Capitalisation Phase 6: Overview- Capitalisation Phase 3: DGNB-UD certification HQE-A certification AQUA-BL certification Usage phase Stage 3: LEED-ND Certification Time limit of 3 years after completion Final certificate AQUA-BL Certification Optional 24

25 Comparison of the schemes' contents AQUA LEED BREEAM DGNB Green Star CASBEE Themes addressed during certification Most recent version Nbr of themes Nbr of criteria or sub-criteria Nbr of prerequisites Weighting Draft (+1) none none none none none none none none yes none yes 1 Integration of the neighbourhood Integration of the neighbourhood Smart links and localisation Governance Environmental quality Governance Natural environment 2 Environment and health Environment and health Neighbourhood model and design Economic development Economic quality Design Functionality of services for the designated space 3 4 Community life and neighbourhood dynamics Community life and neighbourhood dynamics Green infrastructure and buildings Innovation and the design process Resources and Energy Land use and ecology Social and functional quality Technical quality Liveability Economic prosperity Contribution to the community Environmental impact on the micro climate, on building façades and on the landscape 5 Regional properties Transportation and mobility Process quality Environment Social infrastructures 6 Innovation (optional) Innovation Management of the local environment 25

26 Casbee-UD Casbee Green Star Star Comparison of the schemes' contents Note: the different elements compared below are an indication of "matching themes", and not matching contents 15% 19% 20% 10% 15% 21% 16% 17% 20% 24% 14% 9% Natural Envrionnement environment naturel 15% Functionality Fonction de of services pour for the l'espace 20% designated désigné space Contribution to à the la communauté community locale 15% Environmental Impact envrionnemental impact the sur le 16% microclimat, climate, les on building façades façades et le paysage and on the landscape Infrastructures sociales 20% Social infrastructures 20% Gestion de l'envrionnement local 14% Management of the local environment 14% Green Green Star Star Governance Gouvernance 19% DGNB-UD DGNB-UD 23% 23% 23% 22% 10% Design Conception 10% Liveability Habitabilité 21% BREEAM-C BREEAM-C 9% 15% 17% 11% 22% 13% 13% Economic Prospérité prosperity économique 17% Environment Environnement 24% LEED-ND LEED-ND HQE-A /AQUA-BL HQE-A / AQUA-BL 25.5% 30% 37.3% SPM 40% 28.1% 30% 5.5% 3.6% Innovation 9% 9% DGNB-UD DGNB-UD Environmental Qualité envrionnementale quality 23% Economic Qualité économique quality 23% 0% 0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% HQE-A/AQUA-BL / AQUA-BL LEED-ND Gouvernance Governance (SPM) (SMO) Intégration Integration and et Cohesion Cohérence of the du neighbourhood quartier 30% Localisation Smart links and "intelligente" localisation et réseaux 23% 23% Qualité Environmental environnementale and health quality et sanitaire 40% Modèle Neighbourhood de quartier model et conception and design 37% Vie Community sociale life et Dynamique and Economic économique dynamics 30% Infrastructures Green infrastructure et bâtiments and buildings verts 28% Innovation et and processus the design de process conception 6% Propriétés Regional properties régionales 4% Social Qualité and sociale functional et fonctionnelle quality 23% Technical Qualité technique quality 22% Quality Qualité of du the processus 10% BREEAM-C Governance Gouvernance 9% 9% Local Economie economy locale 15% 15% Social Bien-être well-being social 17% Environmental Conditions environnementales conditions 11% Resources Ressources and et Energy Energie 22% 26 Land Usages use and des ecology sols et écologie 13% Transportation Transports et and mobilité mobility 13%