The Berlin Energy Saving Partnership

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "The Berlin Energy Saving Partnership"

Jonas Dawson
8 years ago
Views:

1 Dipl. Geogr. Alexandra Waldmann Berliner Energieagentur GmbH Public Sector Finance Seminar - Fundetech Berlin, 31 May 2007

2 Berliner Energieagentur Facts and Figures Foundation: in 1992 as Public-Private Partnership Shareholders: Vattenfall Europe GASAG Federal State of Berlin KfW Banking Group Annual Turn-Over Over: about 5 million Know - how 40 members of staff

Europe GASAG Federal State of Berlin KfW Banking Group

3 What does it do? Leveraging private capital for public sector energy efficiency Unlocking dead capital Stabilising / Increasing the building value though technology upgrade and operational optimisation Reduction in operation cost Operational reliability Positive effects on environment

Unlocking dead capital Stabilising / Increasing the building value

4 Client User of existing equipment Aim Reduce enegy consumption and costs SCO Services Partial replacement, optimisation, operation and maintenance Refinancing isks of ESCO Through savings Savings, Operation and Maintenance EPC; 15% Operation & Financing; 10% conomies for Client Feasible through savings ESC;

Refinancing isks of ESCO Through savings Savings, Operation and Maintenance

5 duration model / participation model Energy cost [ /a] energy cost saved = contracting rate Share of customer Real cost Contracting rate Reduced cost Start of main tasks End of contract time[years] Duration of energysaving measures

Real cost Contracting rate Reduced cost Start of main

6 Principles Energy Consumption and cost reduction is guaranteed by ESCO Investment and Services by ESCO are prerequisite Refinancing is based on guaranteed savings Customer is (immediately) participating in savings and receives payment of balance in case of non-performance Contract duration depends on savings potential, Investment level and %age of client s immediate participation in savings Contract with specific and separate guarantee of savings Functional tender for selection of ESCO Tested standard documents and calculation approaches Neutral process management for win-win of both contract partners

depends on savings potential, Investment level and %age of client s immediate participation in savings Contract with specific and separate guarantee of

7 Scope - Single technology versus systemic approach Single measure Replacement/ optimisation of a single technology Limited responsibility of ESCO Min. 75k energy costs per annum to be feasible 5-8 years contract duration Used for e.g. lighting system Systemic solution Systematic implementation of savings potential Comprehensive responsibiltiy of ESCO Min. 250k energy costs per annum years contract duration Used for one or more real estates

8 Success Pool 1 Pool 2 Pool 3 Pool 4, Pankow Pool 5, Hellersdorf Pool 6, Spandau Pool 9, Friedrichshain Pool 11, Steglitz/ Zehlendorf Summe gezeichnete Verträge iegenschaften aseline-kosten more than 1,300 buildings 294 DM/a aseline-verbrauch MWh/a nergiesparpartner ARGE ESP ESB Energiespar- ARGE ESP Johnson Controls HEW Contract Johnson Controls ARGE ESB Guaranteed savings Bewag / Betreibergesellschaft in total: Landis&Staefa / Regelungs JCI Regelungs- million (26 %) MVV Energie AG Landis&Gyr mbh Bewag technik GmbH technik GmbH WFM GmbH & Co ertragsbeginn ertragslaufzeit Jahre Jahre Jahre Jahre Jahre Jahre Jahre voraussichtlic h Jahre rstinvestition DM arantieeinsparung Annual CO % ca Reduction 60,484 t * ca. 20 * 15,7 24,2 23,6 22,0 19,67 22,00 arantieeinsparung DM insparung des uftraggebers in % 7,7 9,1 7,1 brutto 7,1 6,7 4,0 3,5 2,4 arantierte Haushaltsntlastung in DM/a usätzliche Beteiligung es AG ab einer insparung von - in Höhe n Total number of Pools: 20 Annual plus to the public household: Total net Investment: , , , ,67-90 In den Verträgen Pool1 und Pool 2 bezieht sich die Garantiehaftung lediglich auf die Beteiligung des Auftraggebers 2.5 million million im 1. Jahr, 75% im 2. Jahr, 50% ab dem 3. Jahr

9 Financing issues Energy Savings = Cash-Flow Contractually stipulated Guarantee = Risk management Standardised calculation- and saving verification method = Risk manangement Fixed price Baseline = minimising risk of results Good contract design = Good Risk management

and saving verification method = Risk manangement Fixed price

10 Financing of investment is based on the guaranteed savings ESCO can control technical risk (stipulated in contract) Forfeiting of future payments /receivables is interesting for ESCO to refinance Credit risk therefore corresponds to municipal finance risk

of future payments /receivables is interesting for ESCO to

11 Success Factors Market development needs Public sector leadership and clear mandate for energy services Harmonised tested procedures Competition Independent experts for project management and market mediation Further capacity growth in the financial sector

tested procedures Competition Independent experts for project

12 Model contracts and tender documents core target: getting projects off the ground The Berlin Energy Saving Partnership International Know-How Transfer EPC Berlin experience transferred Slovenia, Bulgaria, Romania Chile, India Clearcontract Clearinghouse for Energy Contracting in CEE Model contracts and tender documents Local capacity building CZ: >10 contracts signed since 2003

Slovenia, Bulgaria, Romania Chile, India Clearcontract Clearinghouse for Energy Contracting in

13 Vielen Dank!

Energy Saving Partnership Berlin

Energy Saving Partnership Berlin Best Practice Examples and Future Developments International Conference Climate protection potential of energy efficiency Brussels, 09 November 2011 Susanne Berger, Berliner