Deliverable 9.1 Management Plan
|
|
- Paula Morgan
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Deliverable 9.1 Management Plan Author: Maurizio Omologo Affiliation: Fondazione Bruno Kessler Document Type: R Date: May 15 th, 2012 Status/Version: 1.0 Dissemination semination Level: PU
2 Project Reference Project Acronym Project Full Title Dissemination Level FP7-ICT DIRHA Distant-speech Interaction for Robust Home Applications PU Contractual Date of Delivery March 31, 2012 Actual Date of Delivery May 15, 2012 Document Number Type DIRHA_D9.1_ Deliverable Status & Version Final 1.0 Number of Pages 3+6 WP Contributing to the Deliverable WP Task responsible Authors (Affiliation) WP9 Maurizio Omologo (Fondazione Bruno Kessler) Maurizio Omologo (Fondazione Bruno Kessler) Other Contributors - Reviewer - EC Project Officers Alexandra Wesolowska, Pierre Paul Sondag Keywords: Management procedures, Project management structure, WP/task responsibilities, Documentation, Communication, Cost management plan Abstract: This document reports on the management procedures and tools adopted by DIRHA Consortium during the first months of the project. The adopted management structure is described, specifying the recently assigned WP/task responsibilities inside the Consortium. Schedule management, communication management, and cost management plans are then addressed. The document is complementary to what previously reported in Annex I - DoW. DIRHA_D9.1_ ii
3 Summary Summary... iii 1. Introduction Preliminary issues Project management structure Communication management plan Documentation Meetings Cost management plan...6 DIRHA_D9.1_ iii
4 1. Introduction This deliverable has the purpose of describing the management procedures and tools adopted by the DIRHA Consortium at the beginning of the project. Starting from the contents of the Annex I - Description of Work (DoW) document, and based on decisions made during and after the kickoff meeting which was held in Trento on February 1-2, 2012, the general management plan is outlined. A goal of the document is to summarize in a synthetic way the main features characterizing project management under DIRHA, and then provide some information which was still provisional in the DoW document. In particular, the adopted management structure is described, specifying the recently assigned WP/task responsibilities inside the Consortium. Schedule management, communication management, and cost management plans are then discussed, with reference to what outlined in the DoW document. 2. Preliminary issues As reported inside Annex I - DoW, the DIRHA project is managed according to established best practice procedures with all necessary instruments needed to ensure smooth execution, and with clear plans for quality management, conflict resolution, risk management, and intellectual property right management strategy. The chapter B2 of DoW is structured in a set of sections addressing the management structure and procedures, the description of the Consortium and its Beneficiaries, and the resources to be committed. In particular, Section B2.1 focuses on: management structure; the coordinator; project meetings; communication and reporting; consortium agreement; risk assessment and mitigation plans. Those sections, together with Section B1.3, which describes the overall strategy to reach the objectives of the project, the work package breakdown and its timing, and with milestones and deliverables reported in Part A, provide a comprehensive description of the plan, capturing the entire project end-to-end, covering all project phases, from initiation through planning, execution and closure. To avoid redundancy (between this deliverable and what outlined in the DoW document), in the following we will not address again aspects related to the role of the Coordinator and to schedule management plan, since at this moment related activities, roles, work breakdown, work assignments, durations and schedule are those reported in the Annex I - DoW document. IPR management As for Intellectual Property Right (IPR) management, it is worth noting that before the beginning of the project the Consortium completed and signed the Consortium Agreement (CA), which in particular lays down general rules related to the management of the Project and their agreements with respect to certain matters including (but not limited to) access rights and liability. As discussed while preparing CA, and then reprised during the kickoff meeting, the current version of CA should specify in its Annex 2 the Background to which Parties are ready to grant DIRHA_D9.1_
5 Access Rights (i.e., Background necessary to each Party for carrying out Project activities). All Background not listed in Annex 2 shall in fact be explicitly excluded from Access Rights (unless it is added during the Project by written notice). Due to the need of examining in more detail some technical issues during the first months of the project, the Consortium established that the topic will be an issue to finalize during the first semester of the project. For this reason, IPR regarding Background technologies is not further addressed in this document, although it will represent a fundamental aspect for a smooth execution of the project. 3. Project management structure As reported in the Annex I DoW document, DIRHA project management is organised within a specific workpackage (i.e., WP9) led and handled by the Coordinator. During the kickoff meeting, the Consortium established that the project management will be based on a structure as shown in Figure 1, which is compatible with what indicated both in the Annex I - DoW and in the Consortium Agreement. Figure 1 Management structure based on a Joint Management and Technical Board. The Joint Management and Technical (JMT) Board is the executive body of the project, i.e., it takes the strategic scientific decisions as well as any decisions related to project execution. It is managed by the General Project Manager (GPM) and, as discussed below, it comprises two members for each Partner. In other words, this body is responsible for policy and decision making, and its roles can be summarized as follows: ensure the quality management of the project; meet schedules and goals, monitoring technical activities (milestones, deliverables, etc.) and solving problems occurring at WP level; ensure consistency among different work packages, keeping a high level of intergration between them; resolve conflicts; track costs; DIRHA_D9.1_
6 create and update technology implementation plan, etc.; decide upon any technical proposal made by the WP leaders; make proposals to the Parties for review and/or amendment of terms of the GA; decide upon any change and exchange of work packages between the Parties; assign Defaulting Party's tasks to other entities; decide upon procedures and tools for the marking and handling of information exchanged between Parties in the performance of the Project. The JMT Board consists of two sub-groups, Management and Technical Boards respectively, overall comprising max. two representatives for each partner (corresponding to WP leaders for partners which are responsible of WPs) and max. three representatives (including the Project Manager) of the Coordinator. The two complete lists are reported in the following. Members of the Management Board section ATHENA-RC-IAMU: Petros Maragos (deputy Makis Potamianos); DOMOTICAREA: Samuel Ramella (deputy Franco Giovanazzi); FBK: Maurizio Omologo (General Project Manager); INESC-ID: Alberto Abad (deputy Isabel Trancoso); NEWAMUSER: Roberto Manione; STItaly: Roberto Sannino (deputy Daniele Caltabiano); TUGraz: Gernot Kubin. Members of the Technical Board section (related WP, of which they are responsible, is under brackets) ATHENA-RC-IAMU: Makis Potamianos (deputy Petros Maragos) (WP7); DOMOTICAREA: Franco Giovanazzi (deputy Samuel Ramella); FBK: Maurizio Omologo (WP9), L.Cristoforetti (WP6), P.Svaizer (WP3); INESC-ID: Alberto Abad (deputy Isabel Trancoso) (WP4); NEWAMUSER: Fiorenza Arisio (WP1), Roberto Manione (WP5); STItaly: Daniele Caltabiano (deputy Roberto Sannino) (WP8); TUGraz: Martin Hagmueller (WP2). The JMT Board will meet jointly, at least twice per year, and act together except when a decision has to be made by the MB alone. In both boards (in case they have to meet separately), as well as in the joint one, each Party has always right of one vote. The Board shall not deliberate and decide validly unless at least two-thirds (in other words, given a consortium of seven partners as this one, five partners are necessary to validate it) of its members are present or represented ("quorate"). After the kickoff meeting, each partner indicated who will be the leader of each WP, and the coordinator of each Task for which it is responsible. Figure 2 describes the current situation. Each partner has also indicated for each task the reference person and the team which will contributes to. Corresponding lists of individuals are not reported here, but are available in the internal web site, where they will be maintained up-to-date. Specific mailing-lists for each WP and task have been created accordingly. The WP leader shall be responsible: of a detailed coordination, planning, monitoring, reporting of the WP activities; in particular, she/he reports to the GPM and to the Joint Management and Technical Board through progress reports and possible proposals of modifications to the given programme; of coordination of her/his WP with other WPs of the project, making decisions, and ensuring the work plan is not jeopardized; DIRHA_D9.1_
7 for performance and progress of the work packages with regard to the project plan; to ensure a horizontal information flow, the synchronization with other work packages as well as the identification and immediate reporting of problems. Moreover, under T9.2 GPM and WP leaders will: assess the project progress towards the given objectives; ensure the preparation of deliverables to meet time and quality targets; coordinate and supervise activities being conducted under each workpackage. The Task leader has the role of coordinating a given task for the achievement of the goals described in the DoW, and in case it is redefined and planned during the project life, ensuring the commitment of involved individuals to such goals and the enhancement of the related group cohesion. As to the responsibility for each partner at a deeper level, in particular for scientific and technological issues, both Part A and Section B1.3.5 of Annex I - DoW provide enough details on the lead beneficiary for each deliverable and milestone, as well as on the topics and techniques which will be investigated by each partner team under each task. This level of detail should be satisfactory enough to ensure a clear definition of the roles inside the Consortium and, as a consequence, for a smooth execution of the project. As for financial and administrative issues, the reference persons at FBK are Mr. Umberto Silvestri and Mr. Marco Filippozzi. Each partner has also indicated to FBK their reference persons for legal, contractual, administrative, and financial issues. Figure 2 Assignment of responsibilities for each workpackage and task. 4. Communication management plan The communication management plan sets the communication framework for the DIRHA project, both between Coordinator and Commission, and internal to the Consortium. Two main aspects of the communication management are here addressed, namely documentation and meetings. DIRHA_D9.1_
8 4.1 Documentation At the kickoff meeting, the Consortium established the documentation be produced as reported in the following: Every two months: o Update an action list (by the Coordinator); o Progress reporting of each work package/task (by WP/Task leaders). Every three months: o Fill in the three-month period breakdown by activities (by each Partner) together with a companion document regarding financial aspects. Every six months (as reported in the Appendix X to Annex I): o Progress technical report (part I of Interim Progress/Activity Report); o Consortium Management (part II of Interim Progress/Activity Report). Every one year: o Periodic Activity Report (that is part I of the Annual Report); o Periodic Management Report (that is part II of the Annual Report). It is worth noting that the information reported in the action lists, progress reports and breakdowns, every two-three months, are to be considered just internal to the Consortium, useful to the Coordinator to ensure the best quality of management at all the levels. On the other hand, the reports produced every six months will be delivered by the Coordinator to the Commission. Besides the deliverables reported in the Annex I - DoW, it is foreseen that Internal Deliverables will be realized for every WP/Task/Deliverable, which should generally represent portions of technical official deliverables. In particular, the introduction of internal deliverables is needed: When a provisional report is necessary to document on an activity that has already been completed at a given stage of the project; When for the related activity a more articulated official deliverable is foreseen in a later stage. It is recommended that internal deliverables be concise and organized, from the beginning, thinking to the way they will eventually be incorporated into the corresponding official deliverable. This activity (as for the reporting mentioned in the previous slide) will be managed by the WP leader with the support of each Task leader. Also internal deliverables are just internal to the Consortium and they will not provided to the Commission, unless the whole Consortium decides that an internal deliverable may be useful to the Reviewers because it completes the analysis of a topic not fully addressed in any of the official deliverables. As reported in the Appendix X to Annex I and highlighted by the Project Officer Ms. Wesolowska during the kickoff meeting, an Annual Public Report will then be produced every November 15 th. Finally, it is worth noting that an internal web site has been set-up which will be used by the consortium as a mean for information, data, software, and document exchange. 4.2 Meetings During the kickoff meeting it was confirmed that a Project Meeting will be held every 4-6 months. During it, there can be a specific meeting involving only JMT Board members (at least two per year). One meeting and at least two audio-conferences will also be organized every six months per each technical work package (in particular for WP1, WP2, WP3, WP4, WP5, WP6, WP7). These meetings and audioconferences will have the following objectives: Analyze ongoing activities and achieved results; Contribute to the progress reporting for each technical area; DIRHA_D9.1_
9 Harmonize activities between different WPs; Highlight possible delays in some tasks; Revise the task scheduling where necessary; Update the action list. No rule holds about possible bilateral or multi-lateral meetings involving a limited number of partners on a specific topic, which are encouraged when it is felt necessary. WP leaders will periodically report to the JMT Board about these possible WP related events. A progress meeting may also be organized with the Project Officer every six months (see Appendix X to Annex I - DoW). 5. Cost management plan The Coordinator, FBK, is responsible for managing and reporting on the project s costs throughout the duration of the project. In particular, once received funds from the Commission it distributes the amounts corresponding to the associated beneficiaries participation in the project. As for reporting, it is foreseen that within 60 days after the end of each reporting period (3 annual RP: 31 st December ) the Consortium shall transmit through the Coordinator a PAR-Periodic Activity Report comprised of: self declaration by the Coordinator on the work carried out; publishable summary; project objectives for the period; work progress and achievements; deliverables and milestones; explanation of the use of the resources 1 ; summary financial report; form C; audit certificate. In order to monitor the project, the Coordinator will ask each Beneficiary to fill in an internal form every three months, as it will be done for the scientific-technical activities. The aim of this Breakdown by activities is to compare the budget with current values. This should allow one to identify any possible deviations from the initial planning and to take proper corrective actions; in addition it makes the successive compilation of Form C easier. 1 A justification of the resources deployed by each Beneficiary linked to the WPs will be provided based on: a description of the personnel involved and the person-months; major costs items: personnel, subcontracts, travels, equipments, consumables, meetings, etc.; problems which have occurred and how they were solved. DIRHA_D9.1_
Guillem Bernat (RAPITA) Communication, Deliverable, Dissemination, Publication, Reporting
D5.2 Project Handbook Document Information Contract Number 249100 Project Website Contractual Deadline Dissemination Level Nature Author Contributors Reviewer Keywords www.proartis-project.eu PM04 Public
More informationGuidelines for reporting. for Accompanying Measures. implemented as. Specific Support Action
SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME Research Infrastructures Action Guidelines for reporting for Accompanying Measures implemented as Specific Support Action This document can be found on the INTERNET at the following
More informationAdministrative + Management Aspects. EU - Framework Programme 7. Grant Agreement: Acronym FMT-XCT Project Kick-off Meeting, 14.05.
Administrative + Management Aspects EU - Framework Programme 7 Grant Agreement: Acronym FMT-XCT Project Kick-off Meeting, 14.05.2008 Dr. Jürgen Ertel Department Program Planing and Management Head of Project
More informationGuidance notes and templates for Project Technical Review involving Independent Expert(s)
Guidance notes and templates for Project Technical Review involving Independent Expert(s) FP7 Collaborative Projects, Networks of Excellence, Coordination and Support Actions Version 18/12/2007 Disclaimer
More informationProposal template (Technical annex) Research and Innovation actions
Proposal template (Technical annex) Research and Innovation actions Please follow the structure of this template when preparing your proposal. It has been designed to ensure that the important aspects
More informationDeliverable 1.1 Description of Quality Management and Risk Processing Responsible partner:
Deliverable 1.1 Description of Quality Management and Risk Processing Responsible partner: BOKU - University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna Institute for Transport Studies List of abbreviations
More informationD E F I N I T I O N O F Q U A L I T Y C O N T R O L P R O C E D U R E
D E F I N I T I O N O F Q U A L I T Y C O N T R O L P R O C E D U R E D 1.1 Document identifier: V-Must.net - D1.1 Definition of quality control procedure V.1.1 Due Date of Delivery to EC End of Month
More informationAdministrative forms (Part A) Project proposal (Part B)
Ref. Ares(2015)2346168-04/06/2015 Project Grants (HP-PJ) Administrative forms (Part A) Project proposal (Part B) Version 2.0 05 June 2015 Disclaimer This document is aimed at informing potential applicants
More informationProposal template (technical annex) Health, demographic change and wellbeing Two-stage Research and Innovation actions Innovation actions
Proposal template (technical annex) Health, demographic change and wellbeing Two-stage Research and Innovation actions Innovation actions Note: This is for information only. The definitive templates to
More informationNegotiations feedback for successful project preparation. ERANIS workshop, 27.11.2007, Minsk
Negotiations feedback for successful project preparation Negotiations procedure Feedback from the Commission on the project plan issues that need to be explained in more detail Request to formulate Annex
More informationHorizon 2020. Proposal template for: H2020 Widespread 2014 1 Teaming
Horizon 2020 Proposal template for: H2020 Widespread 2014 1 Teaming Framework Partnership Agreement (FPA) and Coordination and support action (CSA) 1 This proposal template has been designed to ensure
More informationH2020 Model Grant Agreement for Lump sum grants (H2020 MGA Lump sum Multi)
H2020 Model Grant Agreement for Lump sum grants (H2020 MGA Lump sum Multi) Version 1.0 9 June 2015 HISTORY OF CHANGES Version Publication date Changes 1.0 09.06.2015 Initial version 1 EUROPEAN COMMISSION
More informationProposal Negotiation. a guide. Constantine Vaitsas, vaitsas@help-forward.gr
Proposal Negotiation a guide Constantine Vaitsas, vaitsas@help-forward.gr Presentation Outline Proposal Time Scale Negotiation Process Legal Negotiations Financial Negotiations Technical Negotiations NEF
More informationPROPOSAL ACRONYM - ETN / EID / EJD (delete as appropriate and include as header on each page) START PAGE MARIE SKŁODOWSKA-CURIE ACTIONS
START PAGE MARIE SKŁODOWSKA-CURIE ACTIONS Innovative Training Networks (ITN) Call: H2020-MSCA-ITN-2015 PART B PROPOSAL ACRONYM This proposal is to be evaluated as: [ETN] [EID] [EJD] [delete as appropriate]
More informationDeliverable D1.1. Building data bridges between biological and medical infrastructures in Europe. Grant agreement no.: 284209
Deliverable D1.1 Project Title: Building data bridges between biological and medical infrastructures in Europe Project Acronym: BioMedBridges Grant agreement no.: 284209 Research Infrastructures, FP7 Capacities
More informationHow to write proposal section 3: IMPLEMENTATION? 26.06.2014 The Hague Christiane Kummer Pt-Juelich
How to write proposal section 3:? 26.06.2014 The Hague Christiane Kummer Pt-Juelich Research Proposal (Part B) - Structure Stage 1 1. Excellence 2. Impact 3. Implementation 3.1 Work plan Work packages,
More informationGUIDE FOR APPLICANTS
European Commission THE SEVENTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME The Seventh Framework Programme focuses on Community activities in the field of research, technological development and demonstration (RTD) for the period
More informationProject management in FP7. Gorgias Garofalakis ETAT S.A.
Project management in FP7 Gorgias Garofalakis ETAT S.A. The whole process EU FP7 Project Project idea Proposal writing Evaluation Negotiations Project implementation Contact with partners after the evaluation
More informationGuidelines for a Consortium Agreement (CA)
Guidelines for a Consortium Agreement (CA) The CA is an agreement made between participants in a collaborative project to govern a number of issues, i.e. relationship between partners, organisation and
More informationPublic Transportation - Accessibility for All
Deliverable 1.1 Project Management Plan & Schedule (incl. project management strategies, risk management plan, dissemination plan and a detailed project schedule) Grant agreement no.: 233701 Project acronym:
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Research & Innovation. Guidance How to draw up your consortium agreement
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Research & Innovation Guidance How to draw up your consortium agreement Version 2.0 23 February 2015 Guidance How to draw up your consortium agreement: V2.0
More informationResearch proposal (Part B)
Research and Innovation Actions (RIA) Innovation Actions (IA) Research proposal (Part B) Version 1.1 3 November 2014 Disclaimer This document is aimed at informing potential applicants for Horizon 2020
More informationMANUAL FOR THE EURO-HEALTHY
MANUAL FOR THE EURO-HEALTHY INTERNAL AND PERIODIC PROJECT MONITORING AND REPORTING Coimbra, May, 2015 EURO-HEALTHY project has received funding from the European Union s Horizon 2020 research and innovation
More informationProject reporting in FP6
Guidance notes for Integrated Projects, Networks of Excellence, Specific Targeted Research or Innovation Projects, Coordination Actions, Specific Support Actions, Co-operative Research Projects and Collective
More informationSustaining Ethical Aquatic Trade. Management
Sustaining Ethical Aquatic Trade Management Theme 2 Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, and Biotechnology Improving the sustainability of food chains Why the EU supports this type of research Why is sustainability
More informationProject Execution Guidelines for SESAR 2020 Exploratory Research
Project Execution Guidelines for SESAR 2020 Exploratory Research 04 June 2015 Edition 01.01.00 This document aims at providing guidance to consortia members on the way they are expected to fulfil the project
More informationAdrian Cristal (BSC), Osman Unsal (BSC) Reviewer
Document Information Contract Number 318693 Project Website D1.1 Project Management Tools www.paradime-project.eu Contractual Deadline Month 6 (30 March 2013) Dissemination Level Public Nature Report Author
More informationBONE Network of Excellence
SEVENTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME D03.1 Electronic Communication Tools Specification FP7-ICT-216863/UNIBO-UPC/R/PU/D03.1 Project Number: FP7-ICT-2007-1 216863 Project Title: Building the Future Optical Network
More informationARTEMIS-ED-21-09. Guidance notes and templates for Project Technical Review involving independent expert(s)
Guidance notes and templates for Project Technical Review involving independent expert(s) 1 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION... 3 2 THE PROJECT REVIEW PROCESS... 3 3 MANDATE OF THE INDEPENDENT EXPERT(S)... 5 3.1
More informationPeriodic Technical Report (parts A and B) Periodic Financial Report. Version 1.0 15 July 2015
Periodic Report Template (RIA, IA, CSA, SME instrument, MCSA) Periodic Technical Report (parts A and B) Periodic Financial Report Version 1.0 15 July 2015 Disclaimer This document is aimed at informing
More informationIntellectual Property in FP7 projects
Intellectual Property in P7 projects IGLO training, russels, 25 th ebruary 2010 Stéphane eslier IPR Helpdesk - University of Alicante IPR-Helpdesk is a constituent part of the IP Awareness and Enforcement:
More informationInternational Collaboration on Research Data Infrastructure
Project Acronym Project Title icordi International Collaboration on Research Data Infrastructure Project Number 312424 Deliverable Title Quality plan and Risk register Deliverable No. D1.1 Delivery Date
More informationChecklist for a Coordination Agreement for Coordinated Calls (Option 2)
Checklist for a Coordination Agreement for Coordinated Calls (Option 2) 01/04/08 Note There are two different types of coordinated calls: one where the result is a joint project, i.e. the third country
More informationGuidance notes and templates for Project Technical Review involving Independent Expert(s)
Guidance notes and templates for Project Technical Review involving Independent Expert(s) FP7 Collaborative Projects (CP), Networks of Excellence, Coordination and Support Actions (CSA), CP-CSA, ERA-NET,
More informationSESAR 2020 EXPLORATORY RESEARCH INFO DAY PROPOSALS SUBMISSION & EVALUATION & PROGRAMME MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS
SESAR 2020 EXPLORATORY RESEARCH INFO DAY PROPOSALS SUBMISSION & EVALUATION & PROGRAMME MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS ALESSANDRO PRISTER PROGRAMME MANAGER ER, SJU ER CALL COORDINATOR List of topics covered Call
More informationGUIDELINES FOR PREPARING PROJECT REPORTS (may be downloaded from www.cordis.lu/ist/fethome.htm or www.cordis.lu/ist/fetusef.htm)
THE FIFTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME The Fifth Framework Programme focuses on Community activities in the field of research, technological development and demonstration (RTD) for the period 1998 to 2002. INFORMATION
More informationProject Management in H2020 Projects. Gorazd Weiss, Centre for Social Innovation (ZSI), Austria
Project Management in H2020 Projects Gorazd Weiss, Centre for Social Innovation (ZSI), Austria Outline Project management Project Time Management Project Management structure Roles of project participants
More informationEnd month. Deliverable no
Working Package WP WP Lead partner no name 1 Jildau Bouwman jildau.bouwman@tno.nl Start Detailed information on work packages WP Leader: Legal name of organisation: Country: ZIP code: Town: End Deliverable
More informationGuide for Applicants COSME calls for proposals 2015
Guide for Applicants COSME calls for proposals 2015 CONTENTS I. Introduction... 3 II. Preparation of the proposal... 3 II.1. Relevant documents... 3 II.2. Participants... 4 Consortium coordinator... 4
More informationProposal template and GUIDE FOR APPLICANTS (updated by FIspace)
European Commission THE SEVENTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME The Seventh Framework Programme focuses on Community activities in the field of research, technological development and demonstration (RTD) for the period
More informationEMPIR Reporting Guidelines Part 0 Guide to the parts
Part 0 Guide to the parts EMPIR Reporting Guidelines Part 0 Guide to the parts EURAMET MSU, Hampton Road, Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 0LW, UK Phone: +44 20 8943 6666 Email: msu@npl.co.uk msu.euramet.org
More informationFast track to Innovation: a new instrument in Horizon 2020
Fast track to Innovation: a new instrument in Horizon 2020 29.01.2015 Webinar Ines Haberl Austrian Research Promotion Agency 29.01.2015 Webinar Fast track to Innovation in Horizon 2020 Content 1. Concept
More informationEUROSTARS Consortium Agreement Skeleton
Aim Higher EUROSTARS Consortium IMPORTANT NOTICE The aim of this Skeleton is to sum up the main items for the drafting of a consortium agreement between participants of the same Eurostars project. The
More informationAdministrative forms (Part A) Research proposal (Part B)
Research and Innovation actions Innovation actions Administrative forms (Part A) Research proposal (Part B) 1 April 2015 Disclaimer This document is aimed at informing potential applicants for Horizon
More informationVersion 1.0 11 December 2013
Example of administrative forms and template for the technical annex for proposals for Research and Innovation Actions (RIA) Innovation Actions (IA) Version 1.0 11 December 2013 Disclaimer This document
More informationHabEat - FP7-245012. HabEat
HabEat Determining factors and critical periods in food habit formation and breaking in early childhood: a multidisciplinary approach Grant agreement number: FP7-245012 Medium-scale Collaborative Project
More informationD7.2 Website development and setup of social accounts
Ref. Ares(2015)4057988-01/10/2015 Optical performance monitoring enabling dynamic networks using a Holistic cross-layer, Self-configurable Truly flexible approach H2020-ICT- 645360 D7.2 Website development
More informationGuidelines for applicants for the 1 st Transnational Call for Proposals (pre-proposal phase)
SUSFOOD - An FP7 ERA-NET on Sustainable Food Production and Consumption Guidelines for applicants for the 1 st Transnational Call for Proposals (pre-proposal phase) Closing date for pre-proposals: 03 May
More informationThe TIPS project is supported by the European Commission through the Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development /
FP7 Requirements for your Project's Exploitation Plan Ulrich BOES URSIT Ltd., Bulgaria Outline Goal of the presentation Summarise the exploitation requirements of FP7 Outline Definitions Official documents
More informationVersion 0.3 25 September 2014
Guide for Grant Agreement Preparation Version 0.3 25 September 2014 Disclaimer: This document is aimed at assisting applicants and beneficiaries for Horizon 2020 funding. Its purpose is to explain the
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION INFORMATION SOCIETY AND MEDIA DIRECTORATE-GENERAL. [title of the project] Grant Agreement No ICT PSP GRANT AGREEMENT
EUROPEAN COMMISSION INFORMATION SOCIETY AND MEDIA DIRECTORATE-GENERAL [title of the project] Grant Agreement No ICT PSP GRANT AGREEMENT Version 3, 20/01/2012 GRANT AGREEMENT NO The European Union ( the
More informationGuidelines for Applicants
Guidelines for Applicants CORNET 19 th Call for Proposals Opening National and Regional Programmes for transnational Collective Research between SME Associations and Research Organisations. Closing date:
More informationProject deliverables and reviews
Project deliverables and reviews Angelo Marino REA.S.3 3 May 2012 Reporting requirements Periodic report (within 60 days after end of each reporting period) Final report (within 60 days after end of project)
More informationGuide to Financial Issues relating to FP7 Indirect Actions
Guide to Financial Issues relating to FP7 Indirect Actions Version 3/10/2014 Disclaimer This guide is aimed at assisting beneficiaries. It is provided for information purposes only and its contents are
More informationErfahrungen bei der Antragstellung im 7. Forschungsrahmenprogramm
Erfahrungen bei der Antragstellung im 7. Forschungsrahmenprogramm Dr. Andreas Lüdtke Dr. Andreas Lüdtke - OFFIS Why am I here? coordinator of two projects in FP7 one received 15 points out of 15 the other
More informationZEPHYR project Deliverable D1.1 QUALITY PLAN
THEME [ENV.2012.6.3-1] Innovative resource efficient technologies, processes and services ZEPHYR project Deliverable D1.1 QUALITY PLAN Funding scheme: Collaborative Project Project Acronym: ZEPHYR Project
More informationGuidelines for applicants
ERACoSysMed 1st Joint Transnational Call for Proposals for European Research Projects to demonstrate the feasibility and benefits of systems medicine Guidelines for applicants Submission deadline for pre-proposals:
More informationPROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN Outline VERSION 0.0 STATUS: OUTLINE DATE:
PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN Outline VERSION 0.0 STATUS: OUTLINE DATE: Project Name Project Management Plan Document Information Document Title Version Author Owner Project Management Plan Amendment History
More informationURBACT III Programme Manual
URBACT III Programme Manual Fact Sheet 2E Network Management Table of contents Fact Sheet 2E 0. Introduction... 1 1. Roles and responsibilities of Lead and Project Partners... 2 2. The legal framework...
More informationSouth East Europe (SEE) Implementation Manual
South East Europe (SEE) Implementation Manual Version 5.0 Date of approval (v1.2): 8 th May 2009 1 st amendment (v2.1): 7th July 2009 2 nd amendment (v3.1): 21 st January 2011 3 rd amendment (v3.2): 27
More informationTENDER SPECIFICATIONS
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EDUCATION AND CULTURE Youth and sport; Erasmus+ Traineeships Office INTERINSTITUTIONAL CALL FOR TENDERS OPEN PROCEDURE N EAC/05/2014 COLLECTIVE HEALTH INSURANCE
More informationOPERATIONAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT (USING MS PROJECT)
OPERATIONAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT (USING MS PROJECT) 3 DAY COURSE INTRODUCTION The principles of project management are generic and therefore can be applied to all projects regardless of business sector.
More informationC-IPM. Guidelines for applicants for the 1st Transnational Call for Proposals. Pre-proposal phase. Coordinated Integrated Pest Management in Europe
C-IPM is an ERA-Net funded by the European Commission s 7 th Framework Programme Guidelines for applicants for the 1st Transnational Call for Proposals Pre-proposal phase C-IPM Coordinated Integrated Pest
More informationThe working group provides this model Consortium Agreement as draft without assuming any warranty or responsibility. The use of the text in total or
The working group provides this model Consortium Agreement as draft without assuming any warranty or responsibility. The use of the text in total or in part takes place on the users own risk and does not
More informationThe working group provides this model Consortium Agreement as draft without assuming any warranty or responsibility. The use of the text in total or
The working group provides this model Consortium Agreement as draft without assuming any warranty or responsibility. The use of the text in total or in part takes place on the users own risk and does not
More informationFifth Annual report Guidelines
1 www.seadatanet.org Fifth Annual report Guidelines The annual report includes : - scientific and technical report - financial report 1. Scientific and technical Report If not yet done: send the requested
More informationGuidelines for Applicants
Guidelines for Applicants CORNET 21 st Call for Proposals Combining national and regional programmes for international Collective Research for the benefit of SMEs. Closing date: 30 st of March 2016, 12
More informationProject reports and reviews in FP6
Project reports and reviews in FP6 Zoe Ketselidou IST Operations NCP meeting Brussels, 8 March 2005 Periodic reporting At the end of each reporting period 1. Periodic activity report (overview of progress)
More informationGuidelines for reporting. for Transnational Access. implemented as. Specific Support Action
SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME Research Infrastructures Action Guidelines for reporting for implemented as Specific Support Action This document can be found on the INTERNET at the following address: http://www.cordis.lu/fp6/infrastructures.htm
More informationPROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN TEMPLATE < PROJECT NAME >
PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN TEMPLATE < PROJECT NAME > Date of Issue: < date > Document Revision #: < version # > Project Manager: < name > Project Management Plan < Insert Project Name > Revision History Name
More informationGuidance. Establishing a consortium agreement
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Research & Innovation Guidance Establishing a consortium agreement Version 0.1 IMPORTANT NOTICE Disclaimer You remain fully responsible for your consortium agreement.
More informationFInest Future Internet enabled optimisation of transport and logistics networks
FInest Future Internet enabled optimisation of transport and logistics networks D11.1 Project Management Plan Project Acronym Project Title FInest Project Number 285598 Workpackage Lead Beneficiary Future
More informationMid-Term Review: A contractual obligation and a fruitful dialogue
FP7 Marie Curie Initial Training Networks Mid-Term Review: A contractual obligation and a fruitful dialogue Guidelines for the Mid-Term Review 1 January 2014 2 1 These guidelines shall guide through the
More informationFrequently Asked Questions version 3.0 09.09.2014
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (EASME) Department A - Operations Unit A1 - COSME Frequently Asked Questions version 3.0 09.09.2014 COS-WP2014-2-05- Call for
More informationDeliverable D2.2. MasterMind Website MASTERMIND
Deliverable D2.2 MasterMind Website MASTERMIND MAnagement of mental health disorders Through advanced technologyand services telehealth for the MIND GA no. 621000 Project co-funded by the European Commission
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION RESEARCH EXECUTIVE AGENCY (REA) H2020 1 MODEL GRANT AGREEMENT FOR MARIE SKŁODOWSKA-CURIE INDIVIDUAL FELLOWSHIPS 2 (MSC-IF MONO)
EUROPEAN COMMISSION RESEARCH EXECUTIVE AGENCY (REA) Director H2020 1 MODEL GRANT AGREEMENT FOR MARIE SKŁODOWSKA-CURIE INDIVIDUAL FELLOWSHIPS 2 (MSC-IF MONO) Introductory remark MSC-IF Mono deviates from
More informationAdministrative forms (Part A) Research proposal (Part B)
2016-2017 Research and Innovation Actions (RIA) Innovation Actions (IA) Administrative forms (Part A) Research proposal (Part B) Version 2.0 13 October 2015 Disclaimer This document is aimed at informing
More informationDeliverable 1.2 Project Presentation
FP7-PEOPLE-2012-ITN EID Grant agreement no.: 317387 www.secentis.eu Deliverable 1.2 Project Presentation Abstract This document describes the training program, the objectives, the expected results, the
More informationD1.1: Quality Assurance (QA) Plan
D1.1: Quality Assurance (QA) Plan Internal Deliverable Document ID Status Dissemination Level Version Author(s) FedSMD1.1 final public 1.01 Michael Brenner Abstract The QA plan shall be used to establish
More informationEuro-BioImaging European Research Infrastructure for Imaging Technologies in Biological and Biomedical Sciences
Euro-BioImaging European Research Infrastructure for Imaging Technologies in Biological and Biomedical Sciences WP1 Project Management Task 1.3 Delivery of milestones; reporting duties Deliverable 1.1
More informationH2020 rules for participation, new instruments, evaluation criteria
H2020 rules for participation, new instruments, evaluation criteria Disclaimer : H2020 Regulations are not yet adopted by the legislator. Any information contained in this presentation is legally not binding
More informationDRAFT. Guidance for Member States and Programme Authorities Designation Procedure
23/05/2014 EUROPEAN COMMISSION EGESIF_14-0013 DRAFT European Structural and Investment Funds Guidance for Member States and Programme Authorities Designation Procedure (under Articles 123 and 124 of Regulation
More informationGuide for ERC Grant Holders
Ref. Ares(2012)894501-23/07/2012 European Research Council Guide for ERC Grant Holders [Final version July 2012] Disclaimer: This Guide includes two main parts: firstly an ERC grants descriptive part,
More informationInternal Communications Channels
Learning Analytics Community Exchange Internal Communications Channels Public Deliverable D9.1 By: Hendrik Drachsler, Maren Scheffel Published: 30 April 2014 Keywords: management, internal communications,
More informationSmart Open Services for European Patients Open ehealth initiative for a European large scale pilot of patient summary and electronic prescription
Smart Open Services for European Patients Open ehealth initiative for a European large scale pilot of patient summary and electronic prescription Deliverable: Work Package Document WP3.7 D.3.7.2. FINAL
More informationThe working group provides this model Consortium Agreement as draft without assuming any warranty or responsibility. The use of the text in total or
The working group provides this model Consortium Agreement as draft without assuming any warranty or responsibility. The use of the text in total or in part takes place on the users own risk and does not
More informationSSICLOPS Consortium - A Guide to Project Management and Deliverables
Grant Agreement No.: 644866 Call: H2020-ICT-2014-1 Topic: ICT-07-2014 Type of Action: RIA D6.2: Quality Assurance Plan Revision: v.1.0 Workpackage WP6 Task Task 6.2 Due date 30.04.2015 Submission date
More informationCategory: Financial issues
Category: Financial issues Regarding the calculation of costs, where have the travel costs to be put? The travel costs (for workshops, meetings, etc. within the frame of the project) have to be put under
More informationDeliverable D 6.1 Website
Biogas2PEM-FC Biogas Reforming and Valorisation through PEM Fuel Cells FP7-SME-2012, Grant Agreement No. 314940 Deliverable D 6.1 Website Deliverable details Deliverable version: v1.0 Date of delivery:
More informationFrequently asked questions. FP7 Financial Guide
Frequently asked questions FP7 Financial Guide Budgetary matters Eligible costs of a project What are the criteria for determining whether the costs of a project are eligible? First of all, costs must
More informationProject Management Competency Standards
BSB01 Business Services Training Package Project Management Competency Standards CONTENTS BSBPM401A Apply scope management techniques...3 BSBPM402A Apply time management techniques...8 BSBPM403A Apply
More informationProject Number: 284941 Project Title: Human Brain Project. Neurorobotics Platform v1 preliminary release for internal Consortium use
Project Number: 284941 Project Title: Human Brain Project Document Title: Document Filename: Deliverable Number: Deliverable Type: Neurorobotics Platform v1 preliminary release for internal Consortium
More informationPROJECT DELIVERABLE. Funding Scheme: Collaborative Project
Grant Agreement number: 224216 Project acronym: HANDS Project title: Helping Autism-diagnosed teenagers Navigate and Develop Socially Funding Scheme: Collaborative Project PROJECT DELIVERABLE Deliverable
More informationHorizon 2020 Annotated Model Grant Agreements
Horizon 2020 Annotated Model Grant Agreements General Model Grant Agreement and specific Model Grant Agreements (ERC, SME Instrument, ERA-NET Cofund, PCP-PPI Cofund, EJP Cofund, Framework Partnerships
More informationD.2.8 - Website improvement - Helpdesk Performance Report
Grant Agreement number: 244327 Project acronym: ABEST II Project title: Argentinean Bureau for Enhancing Cooperation with the European Community in the Science, Technology and Innovation Area. Phase II
More informationHORIZON 2020. Rules for Participation and Dissemination Simplification and Innovation. Alexandros IATROU DG RTD K.7
THE EU FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME FOR RESEARCH AND INNOVATION HORIZON 2020 Rules for Participation and Dissemination Simplification and Innovation Alexandros IATROU DG RTD K.7 Rules for participation: Three main
More informationDeliverable Name. D1.1.3 IPR Management Plan v1. DuraArk DURAARK. Date: 201x-MM-DD. Date: 2013-03-31. Document id. id. : duraark/2013/d.1.1.3/v1.
Deliverable Name D1.1.3 IPR Management Plan v1 DuraArk FP7 FP7 ICT ICT Digital Digital Preservation Preservation Grant Grant agreement No.: No.: 600908 600908 Date: 201x-MM-DD Date: 2013-03-31 Version
More informationDeliverable D6.2: Quality Plan FP7-ICT-2011-8
Deliverable D6.2: Quality Plan Date of Delivery: M2 Authors: Eleni Toli (UoA) Dissemination level: PU WP: Work package number Version: 1.0 Keywords: Quality assurance, internal procedures, templates, key
More informationFP7 Project reporting. FP7 INCO National Contact Points Meeting 9 June 2010 - Athens Anne Mandenoff - European Commission - RTD A.
FP7 Project reporting FP7 INCO National Contact Points Meeting 9 June 2010 - Athens Anne Mandenoff - European Commission - RTD A.6 Reference documents 1 Model grant agreement - Grant Agreement (GA): Article
More informationFP7 Rules of Participation Funding schemes Financial issues Evaluation Criteria Implementation Submission Contractual and Financial issues
National Documentation Center (EKT/NHRF) FP7 Rules of Participation Funding schemes Financial issues Evaluation Criteria Implementation Submission Contractual and Financial issues Maria Samara, Administrative
More information