COHOMOGENEITY ONE MANIFOLDS AND SELFMAPS OF NONTRIVIAL DEGREE

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "COHOMOGENEITY ONE MANIFOLDS AND SELFMAPS OF NONTRIVIAL DEGREE"

Transcription

1 COHOMOGENEITY ONE MANIFOLDS AND SELFMAPS OF NONTRIVIAL DEGREE THOMAS PÜTTMANN Abstract. We construct natural selfmaps of compact cohomgeneity one manifolds and compute their degrees and Lefschetz numbers. On manifolds with simple cohomology rings this yields relations between the order of the Weyl group and the Euler characteristic of a principal orbit. As examples we determine all cohomogeneity one actions on irreducible Riemannian symmetric spaces of compact type that lead to selfmaps of degree 1, 0, 1. We derive explicit formulas for new coordinate polynomial selfmaps of the compact matrix groups SU(3, SU(4, and SO(2n. For SU(3 we determine precisely which integers can be realized as degrees of selfmaps. 1. Introduction A natural problem in topology is the following: Given a compact oriented manifold M n, which integers can occur as the degree of maps M M? In the fundamental case where M is a sphere S n all integers can easily be realized since S n is a (n 1-fold suspension of S 1. For other manifolds the problem is usually difficult (see [DuWa] for references and a detailed study in the case of (n 1-connected 2n-manifolds. In order to construct natural maps of degree 1, 0, 1 one might first impose actions of compact Lie groups G on M and then try to find equivariant maps. In the most symmetric case where the action G M M is transitive, it is wellknown and easy to see that every equivariant map is a diffeomorphism and hence has degree ±1. We deal with the case where the action is of cohomogeneity one, i.e., the principal orbits G/H are of codimension 1 or, equivalently, the orbit space M/G is 1-dimensional and hence a closed interval or a circle. We focus on the much more interesting case where the orbit space M/G is a closed interval. Any cohomogeneity manifold M with M/G [0, 1] can be equiped with a G- invariant Riemannian metric such that the Weyl group is finite or, equivalently, such that the normal geodesics are closed (such metrics are dense in the set of G-invariant metrics. There might, however, be infinitely many G-invariant Riemannian metrics with mutually distinct Weyl groups on the same compact manifold M with a fixed action G M M. The elementary but new construction of this paper depends on the order of the Weyl group: We k-fold the closed normal geodesics of M starting from one of the non-principal orbits. This leads to well-defined maps ψ k : M M, k = j W /2 + 1, for even integers j, and even for all integers j provided a certain condition on the isotropy groups is satisfied. In the following theorem we only deal with the general case. For the exceptional case we refer to section 3. supported by a DFG Heisenberg scholarship and DFG priority program SPP

2 2 THOMAS PÜTTMANN Theorem 1. A compact oriented Riemannian cohomogeneity one manifold M whose orbit space M/G is a closed interval and whose Weyl group W is finite admits equivariant selfmaps ψ k : M M for all k = j W /2 + 1, j 2Z with degree { k if the codimensions of both non-principal orbits are odd, deg ψ k = +1 otherwise, and Lefschetz number { jχ(g/h/2 L(ψ k = χ(m if the codimensions of both non-principal orbits are odd, otherwise. Here, χ(g/h denotes the Euler characteristic of a principal orbit. Degree and Lefschetz number of selfmaps are of course not independent. In the case where M n is a rational homology sphere they are coupled by the simple equation L(ψ = 1 + deg ψ for even n or L(ψ = 1 deg ψ for odd n. Hence, we deduce from Theorem 1 that n is odd and χ(g/h = W (in particular, rank G = rank H if the codimensions of both singular orbits are odd 1. On manifolds M with somewhat more complicated cohomology rings one can still use Theorem 1 to derive restrictions for cohomogeneity one actions G M M with rank G = rank H, i.e., χ(g/h > 0. For such actions the dimensions of all orbits are necessarily even (hence the dimension of M is necessarily odd, and the Weyl groups are necessarily finite. Using Dirichlet s theorem on prime numbers in arithmetic progressions one obtains, for example, the following consequence of Theorem 1: Corollary 2. Let G M M be a cohomogeneity one action with rank G = rank H. If M has the rational cohomology ring of a product then χ(g/h = 2 m 1 W. S l1 S l2 S lm, l 1 < l 2 <... < l m, By Theorem 1 cohomogeneity one actions yield selfmaps of degree 1, 0, 1 if and only if the codimensions of both non-principal orbits are odd. Such actions are called degree generating cohomogeneity one actions in the following. Degree generating cohomogeneity one actions are scarce in low dimensions. Scanning the classifications [Neu], [Pa], [Hoe] for degree generating cohomogeneity one actions on simply connected compact manifolds in dimensions 7 yields only a few actions on spheres and products of spheres and two actions on two nontrivial S 3 -bundles M1 7 S 4 and M2 7 CP 2 with sections. We briefly discuss these example in section 4 and deduce from the refined version of Theorem 1 that M1 7 and M2 7 admit equivariant selfmaps ψ k for all k Z with degree k and Lefschetz number 2(1 k and 3(1 k, respectively. The space M1 7 provides an example for Corollary 2. Our first main example appears in dimension 8: the compact Lie group SU(3. Simple selfmaps of SU(3 are already given by the power maps ρ k : A A k. These 1 Note that χ(g/h = W implies W = N(H/H. For the linear cohomogeneity one actions on spheres with rank G = rank H the identity W = N(H/H was already observed in [GWZ]. Cohomogeneity one actions on simply connected Z 2 -homology spheres were classified by Asoh [As]. Except for the linear cohomogeneity one actions on spheres and the standard actions on the Brieskorn manifolds W 2m 1 d with odd d there is only one infinite family of cohomogeneity one Z 2 - homology spheres in dimension 7. The symmetric space M 5 = SU(3/SO(3 with the U(2-action from the left provides an example of a simply connected cohomogeneity one rational homology sphere with H 2 (M 5 = Z 2 which hence does not appear in Asoh s classification.

3 SELFMAPS OF COHOMOGENEITY ONE MANIFOLDS 3 maps are equivariant with respect to conjugation and have degree deg ρ k = k 2 by a well-known result of Hopf [Ho]. Our construction yields additional selfmaps ψ k of SU(3 of every odd degree k and Lefschetz number 0 that extend identity and transposition to an infinite family. These maps are equivariant with respect to the cohomogeneity one action SU(3 SU(3 SU(3, (A, B ABA T. Explicit formulas are given in section 5.5. Combining the maps ρ k with the maps ψ k and a simple argument involving Steenrod squares we prove Theorem 3. For any m N and l Z there is a selfmap of SU(3 with degree 4 m (2l + 1. For each of these selfmaps the entries of the target matrix are real polynomials in the complex entries of the argument matrix. Other integers do not appear as degrees of selfmaps of SU(3. Motivated by this example we determine all degree generating cohomogeneity one actions on irreducible Riemannian symmetric spaces of compact type using Kollross classification [Ko]. The result is a short list of actions. In particular, among the simply connected irreducible Riemannian symmetric spaces of compact type only compact Lie groups and spheres admit degree generating cohomogeneity one actions (see Table 1 and Table 2 in section 5. We determine the entire set of possible degrees of the induced equivariant selfmaps and derive explicit coordinate polynomial formulas for these maps on the matrix groups SU(4 and SO(2n. We finally note that the degree generating linear cohomogeneity one actions on spheres remain the only examples of degree generating cohomogeneity one actions when one inspects the following classifications: The classification of cohomogeneity one actions on the Stiefel manifolds V n,k with k < n 1 implicitly contained in Kollross paper [Ko], the (candidate classification of cohomogeneity one actions on manifolds with positive sectional curvature by Grove, Wilking, and Ziller [GWZ] and the classification of cohomogeneity one actions on simply connected Z 2 -homology spheres by Asoh [As]. The classifications of cohomogeneity one actions on simply connected rational homology complex projective spaces by Uchida [Uch], on rational homology quaternionic projective spaces by Iwata [Iw1], and on rational homology octonionic projective planes [Iw2] also do not yield any further degree generating actions. The author would like to thank A. Rigas and A. Lytchak for useful discussions. 2. Construction of the equivariant selfmaps Before we describe our construction we first summarize the necessary facts about cohomogeneity one manifolds. We refer to the standard sources [Mo], [Bd1], [AA] and the recent paper [GWZ]. Let M be a compact manifold on which a compact Lie group G acts with cohomogeneity one. Then M/G is a circle or a closed interval. In the former case all orbits are principal and M is a G/H-bundle over S 1 with structure group N(H/H. In particular, M has infinite fundamental group. We only consider the case where M/G is a closed interval. The regular part M 0 of M (i.e., the union of principal orbits projects to the interior of the interval and the two end points of the interval correspond to non-principal orbits N 0 and N 1. The manifold M is obtained by

4 4 THOMAS PÜTTMANN gluing the normal disk bundles over N 0 and N 1 along their common boundary. In particular, χ(m = χ(n 0 + χ(n 1 χ(g/h. Suppose that M is equipped with an invariant Riemannian metric,. After rescaling we can assume that M/G is isometric to the unit interval [0, 1]. A normal geodesic is an (unparametrized geodesic that passes through all orbits perpendicularly. Through any point p M there is at least one normal geodesic and precisely one if p is contained in a principal orbit. The group G acts transitively on the set of normal geodesics. We fix a normal geodesic segment γ : [0, 1] M such that γ(]0, 1[ projects to the interior of M/G and p 0 = γ(0 N 0 and p 1 = γ(1 N 1. This segment is a shortest curve from N 0 to N 1. It extends to a parametrized normal geodesic γ : R M. The isotropy groups G γ(t are constant along γ except at the points γ(t with t Z, i.e., at points where γ intersects the non-principal orbits. We denote the generic isotropy group along γ by H. The Weyl group W of (M,, is by definition the subgroup of elements of G that leave γ invariant modulo the subgroup of elements that fix γ pointwise. It is a dihedral subgroup of N(H/H. The geodesic γ is periodic if and only if W is finite. More precisely, the order W of W equals the number of times that γ passes through a fixed principal orbit before it closes. To give an example of what might happen on a standard space consider the diagonal SO(3-action on S 2 S 2 ( α. The normal geodesics are closed if and only if α is rational. In this case, the Weyl group is the dihedral group D p+q of order 2(p + q where α = p/q for positive integers p and q with gcd(p, q = 1. Otherwise, the Weyl group is the infinite dihedral group D. In the following we assume that the Weyl group of (M,, is finite, i.e., the fixed unit speed normal geodesic γ and all their translated copies g γ are closed with period W. Our construction is based on the following elementary fact: Let ψ k : S 1 S 1, λ λ k be the k-th power of S 1. Except in the trivial case where k = 1 the fixed points of ψ k are precisely the k 1 -roots of 1 and ψ k has the property ψ k (λ λ 0 = ψ k (λ λ 0 for λ 0 with λ k 1 0 = 1. In other words, if we have a circle of any length with a fixed base point p 0 then k-folding the intrinsic distance to p 0 is a well-defined map ψ k of the circle with k 1 fixed points and k-folding the distance to any of these fixed points leads to the same map ψ k. Lemma 2.1. The assignment g γ(t g γ(kt leads to a well-defined smooth map ψ k : M M with k = j W /2 + 1 for all j 2Z, and even for all j Z if the isotropy group at γ(t 0 is a subgroup of the isotropy group at γ(t 0 + W /2 for one and hence all odd integers t 0. Proof. We first check that the assignment ψ k : g γ(t g γ(kt yields a welldefined map on the unparametrized closed normal geodesic γ(r. Suppose that g γ(r = γ(r. Then g γ(t = γ(2t 0 ± t with t 0 Z. A simple computation shows ψ k (g γ(t = g ψ k (γ(t. The geometric reason for this equivariance of ψ k under the Weyl group is that all the points γ(2t 0 are fixed points of γ(t γ(kt (here the special form of k is essential and that the k-folding of a circle is the same from every fixed point. Now ψ k is well-defined on γ(r and hence on the regular part M 0 of M since through any point in M 0 there is only one (unparametrized

5 SELFMAPS OF COHOMOGENEITY ONE MANIFOLDS 5 normal geodesic. On N 0 the assignment g γ(t g γ(kt obviously leads to the identity. On N 1 we also get the identity provided j 2Z. If the isotropy group at γ(t 0 is a subgroup of the isotropy group at γ(t 0 + W /2 for one odd integer t 0 then by the action of the Weyl group this is true for all odd integers. If j is an odd integer and k = j W /2 + 1 then g γ(t 0 g γ(kt 0 = g γ(t 0 + W /2. This actually defines an equivariant diffeomorphism N 1 N 1 or an equivariant map N 1 N 0 depending on whether W /2 is even or odd. All in all we have shown that there is a commutative diagram exp νn 0 k νn 0 exp M M where νn 0 denotes the normal bundle of N 0. This implies smoothness of ψ k. ψ k 3. Degree and Lefschetz number Let M be a compact Riemannian cohomogeneity one manifold with finite Weyl group W such that the orbit space M/G is isometric to the interval [0, 1]. The manifold M is orientable if and only if the principal orbits are orientable and none of the non-principal orbits is exceptional and orientable (see [Mo]. In this section we assume that M is orientable and equipped with a fixed orientation. Theorem 3.1. The Lefschetz number of ψ k : M M, k = j W /2 + 1, is { jχ(g/h/2 if codim N 0 and codim N 1 are both odd, L(ψ k = χ(m otherwise, if j is even and L(ψ k = { jχ(g/h/2 if rank G = rank H, χ(n 0 otherwise, if j is odd provided that ψ k is well-defined in this case. Proof. We perturb the map ψ k : M M to a map with only finitely many fixed points and compute the Lefschetz number as the sum of fixed point indices. For this pertubation we use the map l g : M M, p g p where g G is a general element, i.e., the closure of {g m m Z} is a maximal torus of G. By a classical theorem of Hopf and Samelson [HS], the restriction of l g to any of the orbits G p has precisely χ(g/g p fixed points and each of these fixed points has fixed point index one, i.e., det(1l A > 0 where A is the derivative of l g at the fixed point (note that our sign convention is different from that in [HS]. We now consider the composition l g ψ k for a general element g G sufficiently close to 1 G. The equivariant map ψ k maps orbits to orbits. It is clear from the construction of ψ k that only finitely many orbits V 1,..., V m are mapped to themselves, i.e., ψ k (V i = V i. On each of these orbits, ψ k is an equivariant diffeomorphism. Hence, the restriction of ψ k to V i is either the identity or does not have fixed points. The latter property is preserved

6 6 THOMAS PÜTTMANN under small perturbations of ψ k. Therefore, the map l g ψ k can only have fixed points in the orbits V i on which ψ k restricts to the identity, and the number of fixed points in V i is χ(v i. Let p be one of these fixed points in the orbit V. In order to compute the fixed point index at p we need the derivative of l g and ψ k at p. Both derivatives clearly preserve both tangent and normal space to V at p. The derivative of ψ k is multiplication with k on the normal space and the identity on the tangent space. The derivative of l g is close to the identity on the normal space and given by a matrix A with det(1l A > 0 on the tangent space by the above menitoned result of Hopf. Hence, if B denotes the derivative of l g ψ k at p then the fixed point index at p is given by det(1l B = (sgn(1 k codim V = ( sgn j codim V. The final step is now to sum these fixed point indices. We first consider the case where j is even. Then ψ k restricts to the identity on both N 0 and N 1. Since ψ k has k 1 fixed points on γ([0, W ], we have k 1 / W 1 = j /2 1 fixed points on γ(]0, 1[. These fixed points correspond precisely to the orbits on which ψ k restricts to the identity. Hence we get L(ψ k = L(l g ψ k = ( sgn j codim N0 χ(n 0 + ( sgn j codim N0 χ(n 0 + ( j /2 1( sgn j χ(g/h. Now suppose j is odd. Then ψ k restricts to the identity on N 0 but not on N 1. Since ψ k has k 1 fixed points on γ([0, W ], we have k 1 / W 1/2 = ( j 1/2 fixed points on γ(]0, 1[. Hence, L(ψ k = L(l g ψ k = ( sgn j codim N0 χ(n 0 + j 1 ( sgn j χ(g/h. 2 It is straightforward to simplify these two formulas for L(ψ k using the facts that the Euler characteristic of an odd dimensional manifold vanishes, that χ(m = χ(n 0 + χ(n 1 χ(g/h, and that χ(g/h > 0 implies that rank G = rank H and hence that all orbits have even dimension. In the case where the codimensions of both singular orbits are odd one also has to use the fact that χ(n 0 = χ(n 1 since both fibrations G/H N i have fibers that are even dimensional spheres. The degree of ψ k is the sum of the oriented preimages of a regular value. Since the two non-principal orbits are mapped to themselves or one to the other we just need to consider the regular part M 0 of M. In order to determine the correct orientations we transfer the problem from M 0 to G/H (R Z by the map φ : G/H R M, (gh, t g γ(t. The restriction of φ to each G/H ]l, l+1[ with l Z is a diffeomorphism. We equip R with the standard orientation and G/H with an orientation such the restriction of G/H ]0, 1[ M 0 of φ is orientation preserving. This defines a standard product orientation on G/H R. For the rest of the paper, however, we will equip each G/H ]l, l + 1[ with the orientation inherited from M 0 by φ. Lemma 3.2. If codim N 0 and codim N 1 are both odd then all G/H ]l, l + 1[ inherit the standard product orientation from M 0 via φ. If codim N 0 and codim N 1 are both even, only the pieces G/H ]2l, 2l+1[ inherit the standard product orientation from M 0 via φ.

7 SELFMAPS OF COHOMOGENEITY ONE MANIFOLDS 7 If codim N 0 is odd and codim N 1 is even then only the pieces G/H ]4l, 4l + 1[ and G/H ]4l 1, 4l[ inherit the standard product orientation from M 0 via φ. If codim N 0 is even and codim N 1 is odd then only the pieces G/H ]4l, 4l + 1[ and G/H ]4l + 1, 4l + 2[ inherit the standard product orientation from M 0 via φ. Proof. Let σ 0 denote the geodesic reflection along N 0, i.e., σ 0 maps each point g γ(t in M N 1 to g γ( t. This equivariant diffeomorphism of M N 1 corresponds to id in the normal bundle of the orbit N 0 and hence preserves the orientation of M N 1 if and only if codim N 1 is even. We have the equivariant commutative diagram G/H ]0, 1[ φ (gh,t (gh, t G/H ] 1, 0[ φ σ M 0 0 Note that the map ]0, 1[ ] 1, 0[, t t reverses the orientation of R. Hence, G/H ] 1, 0[ inherits the same orientation from M 0 as G/H ]0, 1[ if and only if σ 0 reverses orientation, i.e., if and only if codim N 0 is odd. Corollary 3.3. If M is orientable and codim N 0 and codim N 1 do not have the same parity, then the order W of the Weyl group W of M is divisible by 4. Theorem 3.4. The map ψ k : M M, k = j W /2 + 1 has degree { k if codim N 0 and codim N 1 are both odd, deg ψ k = +1 otherwise, if j is even, and degree k if codim N 0 and codim N 1 are both odd, 0 if codim N 0 and codim N 1 are both even, W 4Z, deg ψ k = 1 if codim N 0 is even, codim N 1 is odd, and W 8Z, +1 otherwise, if j is odd provided that ψ k is well-defined in this case (see Lemma 2.1. Proof. The point γ(τ with τ = 1/2 is a regular value of the map ψ k whose k preimages are given by γ(t m with t m = m W + τ, m Z. k In order to compute whether the differential of ψ k at γ(t m preserves or reverses orientation we lift ψ k : M 0 M 0 to the map ψ k : G/H R G/H R, (gh, t ( gh, kt and answer the same question for the differential of ψj at (eh, t m by applying Lemma 3.2 (note again that we use the orientation on G/H (R Z induced from M 0 by φ. If codim N 0 and codim N 1 are both odd then all pieces G/H ]l, l + 1[ inherit the standard product orientation. Hence, deg ψ k = k and we are done. Thus assume that codim N 0 or codim N 1 are even. For each preimage p of γ(τ there is precisely one m Z such that p = γ(t m and t m ]0, W [. We now have to count how many t m are contained in each of the intervals ]l, l + 1[ M0

8 8 THOMAS PÜTTMANN for l {0, 1,..., W 1}. equivalent to if j 0, and equivalent to j 2 l + l τ W A simple computation shows that t m ]l, l + 1[ is j l + 1 τ (l W < m < j l + 1 τ (l W < m < j 2 l + l τ W if j < 0. Suppose first that j is even. For l > 0 we have l τ W ]0, 1[ and l+1 τ W ]0, 1[. Hence there are precisely j of the t m in each interval ]l, l + 1[ and j + 1 /2 in the interval ]0, 1[. When counted with orientation using Lemma 3.2 the sum of preimages of γ(τ is hence +1 since there are W intervals ]l, l + 1[ and W is divisible by 2 if the codimensions of N 0 and N 1 are both even and W is divisible by 4 if the codimensions of N 0 and N 1 have different parities. Note that in the case j 0 there is one point more in the interval ]0, 1[ than in the other intervals and this point has positive orientation, while in the case j < 0 there is one point less but the orientation of the real line has changed. Suppose now that j is odd. Then l τ W ]0, 1 l+1 τ 2 [ if and only if 0 < l W /2 and W ]0, 1 2 [ if and only if 0 l < W /2. Using these facts it is straightforward to show that there are j + 1 /2 of the t m in each of the intervals ]l, l + 1[ with l = 0, l = W /2, odd l < W /2, or even l > W /2, while there are j 1 /2 of the t m in each of the intervals ]l, l + 1[ with even 0 < l < W /2 or odd l > W /2. The claimed degrees follow now by applying Lemma 3.2. Proof of Corollary 2. Suppose that M has the rational cohomology ring of S l1 S l2 S lm, l 1 < l 2 <... < l m, and that G M M is a cohomogeneity one action with rank G = rank H, i.e., χ(g/h > 0 where H is a principal isotropy group. By Lemma 2.1, M admits equivariant selfmaps ψ k, k = j W /2 + 1, with degree k and Lefschetz number L(ψ k = jχ(g/h for every even integer j. By Dirichlet s theorem there are infinitely many prime numbers in the arithmetic progression k = j W /2+1. Hence, we can assume that k is a prime number. We now inspect the induced map ψk on the cohomology ring. Let x 1,..., x m be generators of H (M with x i H li (M. The equation deg ψ k = k means ψk (x 1x 2 x m = kx 1 x 2 x m. Since k is a prime number and l 1 < l 2 <... < l m it is clear that ψ k(x j = kσ j x j + products of lower dimensional generators with σ j = ±1 for precisely one j {1,..., m} and ψ k(x i = σ i x i + products of lower dimensional generators with σ i = ±1 for i {1,..., m}, i j. The total number of σ i with σ i = 1 for i {1,..., m} must be even. The Lefschetz number L(ψ k is equal to jχ(g/h/2 by Theorem 3.1. On the other hand, L(ψ k is the alternating trace of ψ in cohomology. The simple cohomology ring structure implies jχ(g/h/2 = L(ψ k = ( ( 1 + ( 1 lj kσ j 1 + ( 1 l i σ i. i j

9 SELFMAPS OF COHOMOGENEITY ONE MANIFOLDS 9 Since we can assume j > 2 and since χ(g/h > 0, we have σ i = ( 1 li for all i j and σ j = ( 1 lj. Hence, χ(g/h = 2 m 1 W and Corollary 2 is proved. 4. Basic examples In this section we present basic examples for all the various cases in Theorem 3.1 and Theorem Powers of spheres. The standard example of a cohomogeneity one action on a compact manifold is the action of SO(n on the sphere S n R R n. The regular orbits are great spheres and the two non-regular orbits are the two fixed points (±1, 0. The equivariant selfmaps are the k-powers of S n R R n : (cos t, v sin t k = (cos kt, v sin kt. Our construction in section 2 can be seen as a natural extension of the classical k-powers of spheres to general cohomogeneity one manifolds. If n is odd then the rank of the principal isotropy group SO(n 1 of the SO(n- action on S n is equal to the rank of SO(n. The Weyl group is isomorphic to Z 2 and the non-principal isotropy groups are both equal to SO(n. From Theorem 3.4 we recover the known fact that the degree of the k-power of S n is k if n is odd, and 0 or 1 if n is even, depending on whether k is even or odd. From Theorem 3.1 we recover the Lefschetz number (1 k if n is odd, and 1 or 2 if n is even, depending on whether k is even or odd. It is easy to obtain explicit polynomial formulas for the k-powers of spheres: We define the functions c k and s k implicitly by { c k (sin 2 t, for even k, cos kt = c k (sin 2 t cos t, for odd k and sin kt = { s k (sin 2 t cos t sin t, for even k, s k (sin 2 t sin t, for odd k. Applying the binomial formula to cos kt + i sin kt = (cos t + i sin t k yields [ k /2] ( k c k (r = ( 1 i r i (1 r [ k /2] i 2i i=0 [( k 1/2] ( k s k (r = sgn(k ( 1 i r i (1 r [( k 1/2] i 2i + 1 i=0 where [a] denotes the largest integer less or equal to a. The k-powers of spheres S n R R n are now given by and (x, y k = ( c k (1 x 2, s k (1 x 2 xy for even k (x, y k = ( c k (1 x 2 x, s k (1 x 2 y for odd k. The functions c k and s k will appear several times in other examples below. Additionally, there also appears the function h k (r = 1 c k(r r if k is odd. Note that this function is also polynomial.

10 10 THOMAS PÜTTMANN 4.2. Selfmaps of degree 1 of CP 2l+1. An example of a cohomogeneity one action where the codimensions of the singular orbits have different parity and there are equivariant maps with degree 1 is given by the standard action of SO(1+m SU(1 + m on CP m for odd m. A normal geodesic is given by γ(t = [cos t : i sin t : 0 :... : 0]. The singular orbit at t = 0 is RP m = SO(1 + m/o(m and the singular isotropy groups at t = π/4 and t = π/4 are both equal to SO(2SO(m 1. The normal geodesic γ is closed with period π. Hence, the Weyl group is the dihedral group of order 4 and 2j + 1-folding the distance to N 0 = RP m yields a well-defined map with degree 1 and Lefschetz number m + 1 if j is even and degree 1 and Lefschetz number 0 if j is odd. Note that reflecting the normal geodesics along the RP m is just the involution induced by complex conjugation on C m+1. Note also that for even m selfmaps of CP m with degree 1 cannot exist and this is perfectly matched by the fact that both singular orbits have even codimensions in this case Two 7-manifolds with selfmaps of arbitrary degree. We now discuss the spaces M1 7 = Sp(2 Sp(1 2 Sp(1 and M2 7 = SU(3 U(2 SU(2 where U(2 acts on SU(2 by conjugation and one of the factors of Sp(1 2 acts trivially on Sp(1 and the other by conjugation. The space M1 7 is an S 3 -bundle over S 4. Such bundles are classified by their characteristic homomorphism S 3 SO(4. Using two Cartan embeddings of S 4 into Sp(2 it is not difficult to see that for M1 7 this homomorphism is given by q C q where q is a unit quaternion and C q : H H is conjugation by q. In particular, the bundle M1 7 S 4 has a section but is nontrivial. It is known that M1 7 is not homotopy equivalent to S 3 S 4 but has the same cohomology and homotopy groups as S 3 S 4 [JW]. The group Sp(2 acts from the left on M1 7 by cohomogeneity one. The principal orbits are diffeomorphic to CP 3 = Sp(2/Sp(1SO(2 with Euler characteristic 4 and the singular orbits are both diffeomorphic to S 4. We have rank G = rank H. The Weyl group is isomorphic to Z 2. Hence, by Lemma 2.1 there exist equivariant selfmaps ψ k with degree ψ k = k and Lefschetz number L(ψ k = 2(1 k for all integers k. This example thus illustrates Corollary 2, since 4 = χ(g/h = 2 W. The space M2 7 is an S 3 -bundle over CP 2. The group SU(3 acts fromt the left on M2 7 by cohomogeneity one. The principal orbits are diffeomorphic to SU(3/T 2 with Euler characteristic 6 and the singular orbits are both diffeomorphic to CP 2. Since the bundle M2 7 CP 2 has a section, M2 7 has the same cohomology and homotopy groups as S 3 CP 2. Moreover, the corresponding principal SO(3-bundle over CP 2 is the Aloff-Wallach space W1,1. 7 The first Pontrjagin class of this principal bundle is 3 H 4 (CP 2 Z [Zi]. Hence, the S 3 -bundle M2 7 CP 2 has w 2 = 0 and p 1 = 3. By the Dold-Whitney classification [DoWh] it is nontrivial. The Weyl group of the cohomogeneity one SU(3 action is isomorphic to Z 2. Hence, there exist equivariant selfmaps ψ k with degree ψ k = k and Lefschetz number L(ψ k = 3(1 k for all integers k in agreement with the homology of M The general source of examples. In the examples above we gave concrete cohomogeneity one actions on manifolds already constructed by different methods (homogeneous spaces and twisted products. A vast number of examples is not of this type. Cohomogeneity one manifolds M with M/G [0, 1] can be (reconstructed from their group diagram: Given a compact Lie group G and

11 SELFMAPS OF COHOMOGENEITY ONE MANIFOLDS 11 closed subgroups H K 0, K 1 G such that K 0 /H and K 1 /H are diffeomorphic to spheres there is a Riemannian cohomogeneity one manifold such that H is the generic isotropy group and K 0 and K 1 are adjacent non-principal isotropy groups along this geodesic. In general, a cohomogeneity one manifold cannot be described in a more natural way than by its group diagram. Using group diagrams it is easy to see that there are infinitely many families of cohomogeneity one manifolds that fulfill the different hypotheses of Theorem 3.1 and Theorem Selfmaps of irreducible symmetric spaces of compact type We now apply our construction to the irreducible Riemannian symmetric spaces of compact type. Cohomogeneity one actions on these spaces were classified by Kollross [Ko]. Here we are particularly interested in the degree generating cohomogeneity one actions. In order to determine these actions from Kollross list the main work is to compute the non-principal isotropy groups (or at least their dimensions. It turns out that there exist only a couple of degree generating actions on simply connected irreducible symmetric spaces of compact type, namely, only on spheres and on simple compact Lie groups. We will present some of these actions and the induced selfmaps in detail Some basic facts on the classification. In this and the next subsection we describe some basic aspects of how to determine the degree generating cohomogeneity one actions on the irreducible symmetric spaces of compact type. Since the property degree generating just depends on the codimensions of the non-principal orbits, it suffices to determine the degree generating actions up to orbit equivalence. Two actions G 1 M 1 M 1 and G 2 M 2 M 2 are called orbit equivalent if there is an isometry Φ : M 1 M 2 with Φ(G 1 p = G 2 Φ(p for all p M 1. Let G M M be a cohomogeneity one action of a connected compact Lie group G on a compact Riemannian manifold M such that M/G is diffeomorphic to the interval [0, 1]. Let M M be a covering with finitely many sheets. Then there exists a connected compact Lie group G that covers G finitely and acts with cohomogeneity one on M such that the diagram G M G M M commutes (see [Bd1]. There are now two cases: In the first case the two nonprincipal orbits in M project to distinct non-principal orbits in M. In the second case the two non-principal orbits in M project to the same non-principal orbit in M and the other non-principal orbit in M is exceptional, i.e., its codimension is 1. In any of the two cases, the G-action on M generates degree if and only if the G-action on M generates degree. Clearly, the universal covering space M of an irreducible Riemannian symmetric space of compact type M is again an irreducible Riemannian symmetric space of compact type and the covering M M has finitely many sheets. Hence, it suffices to determine the degree generating cohomogeneity one actions on the irreducible Riemannian symmetric spaces of compact type up to coverings. Note, however, that the Weyl groups of M and M are not necessarily isomorphic. M

12 12 THOMAS PÜTTMANN The irreducible Riemannian symmetric spaces of compact type split into two types: A space of type II is a simple compact Lie group G with its biinvariant metric (unique up to scaling. The identity component of the isometry group of G is finitely covered by G G (the first factor acting by left translations, the second by right translations. Hence, in order to determine the cohomogeneity one actions on G it suffices to study actions of closed connected subgroups of G G. The identity component of the isometry group of a space M of type I is a simple compact Lie group G (simple in the usual sense that the Lie algebra is simple, i.e., has no nontrivial normalizers and the isotropy group K of a point p M lies between the fixed point set of an involutive automorphism of G and its identity component. If a closed subgroup H of G acts on M G/K with cohomogeneity one then the action (H K G G, (h, k g = hgk 1 is also of cohomogeneity one. More precisely, the isotropy group of the H-action on G/K at gk is H gk = H gkg 1 and the isotropy group of the H K-action on G at g is (H K g = {(h, k h H gk, k = g 1 hg} H gk. In particular, the codimension of the H-orbit through gk is equal to the codimension of the H K-orbit through g. Hence, the H-action on M = G/K generates degree if and only if the H K-action on G generates degree. The Weyl group of these actions, however, are not necessarily isomorphic. All in all we see that in order to classify the degree generating cohomogeneity one actions on the irreducible Riemannian symmetric spaces of compact type up to equivalence and coverings it suffices to determine for all simple compact Lie groups G up to coverings the subgroups of G G that act on G with cohomogeneity one and two non-principal orbits of odd codimensions Degree generating actions on simple compact Lie groups. Kollross [Ko] determined for all simple compact Lie groups G (up to covering all largest connected subgroups of G G (up to conjugacy that act on G with cohomogeneity one. We omit the lengthy but more or less straightforward computations and considerations that filter out the degree generating actions from this list and merely present the result. We separate the degree generating cohomogeneity one actions on the compact simple Lie groups in two groups. The first group comprises the following actions: SU(3 SU(3 SU(3, A B = ABA T, Sp(2 Sp(2 SU(4 SU(4, (A, B C = ACB 1, SO(2n 1 SO(2n 1 SO(2n SO(2n, (A, B C = ACB 1, G 2 G 2 SO(7 SO(7, (A, B C = ACB 1. Note that second action is actually a covering action of the action SO(5 SO(5 SO(6 SO(6. We list it separately because the formula for the selfmaps of the matrix group SU(4 turns out to be very simple (see subsection 5.6.

13 SELFMAPS OF COHOMOGENEITY ONE MANIFOLDS 13 The remaining degree generating cohomogeneity one actions are given by the isotropy representations of the symmetric spaces SU(3 SU(3/ SU(3, SU(6/Sp(3, E 6 /F 4, Sp(2 Sp(2/ Sp(2, G 2 G 2 / G 2. These representations provide homomorphisms SU(3 SO(8, Sp(3 SO(14, F 4 SO(26, Sp(2 SO(10, G 2 SO(14 that yield cohomogeneity one actions on the spheres S 7 = SO(8/SO(7, S 13 = SO(14/SO(13, S 25 = SO(26/SO(25, S 9 = SO(10/SO(9, S 13 = SO(14/SO(13. As explained in 5.1, these actions in turn yield the following cohomogeneity one actions on simple compact Lie groups: SU(3 SO(7 SO(8 SO(8, Sp(3 SO(13 SO(14 SO(14, F 4 SO(25 SO(26 SO(26, Sp(2 SO(9 SO(10 SO(10, G 2 SO(13 SO(14 SO(14. Theorem 5.1. The nine actions above are up to coverings and orbit equivalence the only degree generating cohomogeneity one actions on simple compact Lie groups. Proof. Determination of all degree generating actions from Kollross list [Ko]. A list of all degree generating cohomogeneity one actions on irreducible Riemannian symmetric spaces of compact type can now easily be obtained using the constructions in subsection 5.1. In particular, degree generating cohomogeneity one actions exist on no other irreducible Riemannian symmetric spaces of compact type than on simple compact Lie groups and spheres up to coverings Selfmaps of spheres. A complete list of degree generating cohomogeneity one actions on spheres up to orbit equivalence is given in Table 1. The information about the Weyl groups and the non-principal orbits can be retrieved from the detailed tables of cohomogeneity one actions on compact rank one symmetric spaces in [GWZ]. They are also partly computed here in the later subsections. group acting sphere acted on Weyl group selfmap degrees SO(2n 1 S 2n 1 D 1 Z SU(3 S 7 D 3 3Z + 1 Sp(3 S 13 D 3 3Z + 1 F 4 S 25 D 3 3Z + 1 Sp(2 S 9 D 4 4Z + 1 G 2 S 13 D 6 6Z + 1 Table 1. Degree generating cohomogeneity one actions on spheres.

14 14 THOMAS PÜTTMANN Although topologically all spheres admit selfmaps of arbitrary degree only odd dimensional spheres admit cohomogeneity one selfmaps of degree 1, 0, Selfmaps of compact Lie groups. The most natural selfmaps of compact Lie groups G are the power maps ρ k : A A k. These maps are equivariant with respect to conjugation. The cohomogeneity of the adjoint action of G is equal to the rank of G. The power maps ρ k are determined by their restriction to a maximal torus T r G. Using this fact it is easy to see that the degree of ρ k is k r and thus rather few integers can be realized as degrees of power maps. Our construction provides highly symmetric selfmaps of some compact Lie groups whose degrees supplement the sparse list of integers provided by the power maps. For SU(3 we will in particular get a complete list of all possible degrees of selfmaps. We will work out the geometry of the cohomogeneity one actions on SU(3, SU(4, SO(2n, and SO(7 and the related selfmaps in detail in the following subsections. For the selfmaps of SU(3, SU(4, SO(2n we obtain explicit formulas that are coordinate polynomial in the sense that the entries of the target matrix are polynomials in the entries of the argument matrix. For the cohomogeneity one actions on SO(8, SO(10, SO(14, and SO(26 we merely list which integers can be realized by cohomogeneity one selfmaps. The results are summarized in Table 2. group acting group acted on Weyl group selfmap degrees SU(3 SU(3 D 2 2Z + 1 Sp(2 Sp(2 SU(4 D 2 2Z + 1 SO(2n 1 SO(2n 1 SO(2n D 1 2Z + 1 G 2 G 2 SO(7 D 3 3Z + 1 SU(3 SO(7 SO(8 D 3 6Z + 1 Sp(3 SO(13 SO(14 D 3 6Z + 1 F 4 SO(25 SO(26 D 3 6Z + 1 Sp(2 SO(9 SO(10 D 4 8Z + 1 G 2 SO(13 SO(14 D 6 12Z + 1 Table 2. Degree generating cohomogeneity one actions on simple compact Lie groups. Note that the final column in Table 2 does not change when we lift the actions from the special orthogonal groups to the spin groups: For the G 2 G 2 -action on Spin(7 this is in detail explained in subsection 5.8. For all other actions the order of the Weyl groups double but opposite isotropy groups along a fixed normal geodesic become equal. Note also that a cohomogeneity one action on a sphere has the same Weyl group as the induced action on the special orthogonal group. Nevertheless, only half of the selfmaps lift from S 2n 1 to SO(2n or Spin(2n Selfmaps of SU(3. We consider the cohomogeneity one action SU(3 SU(3 SU(3, (A, B ABA T. A straightforward computation shows that γ(t = ( cos t sin t 0 sin t cos t

15 SELFMAPS OF COHOMOGENEITY ONE MANIFOLDS 15 is a normal geodesic for this action, i.e. passes through all orbits perpendicularly. This geodesic is closed with period 2π. At times t = 0 and t = π it passes through the singular orbit SU(3/SO(3 that consists of the symmetric matrices in SU(3. At t = π 2 + πz it passes through the other singular orbit SU(3/SU(2 where SU(2 is embedded in the upper left corner of SU(3. The isotropy group of γ(t for all other times t is SO(2 embedded in the upper left corner of SU(3 in the standard way. The Weyl group is isomorphic to D 2 Z 2 Z 2. Note that the singular isotropy groups at t = π 2 and t = 3π 2 are not just conjugate but equal. Theorem 5.2. SU(3 admits selfmaps ψ k with degree k and Lefschetz number 0 for all odd integers k. These selfmaps are equivariant with respect to the SU(3 action above. An explicit formula is given by ψ k (B = 1 2 s k(r(b + B T c k(r(b B T s k (r 4 r ( b23 b 32 b31 b 13 b12 b 21 ( T b23 b 32 b31 b 13 b12 b 21 where r = (trace B 12 and s k and c k are the functions defined in subsection 4.1. Note that (1 s k (r/r is polynomial in r. Proof. The existence of the selfmaps and their properties follow immediately from Lemma 2.1, Theorem 3.1, and Theorem 3.4. In order to determine an explicit formula, let B = (b il be a fixed matrix in SU(3. We want first to solve the equation B = Aγ(tA T for t [0, π 2 ] and A SU(3, then to multiply t by an odd integer k and, finally, to determine B = Aγ(ktA T. Symbolically, we illustrate this as follows B (A, t (A, kt B. We will see that it is not necessary to determine the entries of A explicitly (with all their ambiguity. We can stop at an intermediate implicit level and then return. Let A = (z, w, v with z, w, v C 3. Then B = Aγ(tA T becomes b ii = (z 2 i + w 2 i cos t + v 2 i, b i,i+1 = (z i z i+1 + w i w i+1 cos t + v i v i+1 v i 1 sin t, b i,i 1 = (z i z i 1 + w i w i 1 cos t + v i v i 1 + v i+1 sin t with indices cyclic modulo 3. It is straightforward to see that cos t = 1 2 (trace B 1, 2 v 1 sin t = b 32 b 23, 2 v 2 sin t = b 13 b 31, 2 v 3 sin t = b 21 b 12, (z 2 i + w 2 i cos t + v 2 i = b ii, (z 2 z 3 + w 2 w 3 cos t + v 2 v 3 = 1 2 (b 23 + b 32, (z 3 z 1 + w 3 w 1 cos t + v 3 v 1 = 1 2 (b 31 + b 13, (z 1 z 2 + w 1 w 2 cos t + v 1 v 2 = 1 2 (b 12 + b 21.

16 16 THOMAS PÜTTMANN We obtain b 11 = (z w 2 1 cos(2j + 1t + v 2 1 = (z w 2 1s 2j+1 (sin 2 t cos t + v 2 1s 2j+1 (sin 2 t + v 2 1(1 s 2j+1 (sin 2 t = b 11 s 2j+1 (sin 2 t ( b 23 b s2j+1(sin2 t sin 2 t and analogous expressions for b 22 and b 33. Note that these are polynomials in the matrix entries of B since sin 2 t = (trace B 12 is a polynomial in trace B and, e. g., b 23 = b 31 b 12 b 11 b 32, since B SU(3. Similarly, we obtain polynomial expressions for the off-diagonal terms of B = ψ 2j+1 (B. All in all this leads to the claimed formula. Corollary 5.3. For every m N and every odd integer (2l+1 there is a coordinate polynomial selfmap SU(3 SU(3 of degree 4 m (2l + 1. Proof. The maps ψ k are defined for odd k and have degree k. The power maps ρ k : A A k have degree k 2. Lemma 5.4. Let φ : SU(3 SU(3 be any map. Then deg φ = 4 m (odd number for some m N. Proof. The cohomology ring H (SU(3; Z is isomorphic to the cohomology ring H (S 3 S 5 ; Z, i.e., to Λ(x, y with generators x in dimension 3 and y in dimension 5. If φ : SU(3 SU(3 is any map, we have the commutative diagram φ H 3 (SU(3; Z 2 H 3 (SU(3; Z 2 Sq 2 Sq 2 H 5 (SU(3; Z 2 φ H 5 (SU(3; Z 2 Vertically, the second Steenrod square Sq 2 yields an isomorphism (see [Bd2], p The diagram thus says that φ (y is an even multiple of y if and only if φ (x is an even multiple of x. Hence, φ (xy is in 4 m (2l + 1 xy for some m N and l Z. Lemma 5.5. We have ρ k (x = kx and ρ k (y = ky while ψ k (x = kx and ψ k (y = y. Hence, none of the ρ k is homotopic to any of the ψ k. Proof. For ρ k we refer to [Ho]. It is easy to see that the subgroup SU(2 embedded in the upper left corner of SU(3 is invariant under ψ k and ψ k restricts to a selfmap of SU(2 with degree k. The commutative diagram ψ k H 3 (SU(3; Z H 3 (SU(3; Z H 3 (SU(2; Z k H 3 (SU(2; Z shows ψk (x = kx. Since deg ψ k = k, the generator xy of H 8 (SU(3; Z is mapped to kxy. Hence, ψk (y = y.

17 SELFMAPS OF COHOMOGENEITY ONE MANIFOLDS Selfmaps of SU(4. Let Sp(2 be the subgroup of SU(4 defined by the equation JC = CJ or, equivalently, by C + J CJ = 0 where J =. We consider the action ( Sp(2 Sp(2 SU(4 SU(4, (A, B C = ACB 1. A normal geodesic γ : R SU(4 is given by γ(t = exp ( it it it it The isotropy groups at γ(t with t π 2 Z are given by at γ(0 by. (Sp(1 Sp(1 = {( ( A 0 0 B, ( A 0 0 B A, B 2 2-matrices }, Sp(2 = {( ( A C B D, ( A C B D A, B, C, D 2 2-matrices }, and at γ( π 2 by Sp(2 = {( ( B A D C, ( } A C B D A, B, C, D 2 2-matrices. Theorem 5.6. SU(4 admits selfmaps ψ k with degree k and Lefschetz number 0 for all odd integers k. These maps are equivariant with respect to the cohomogeneity one action by Sp(2 Sp(2. An explicit formula is given by ψ k (C = 1 2 s k(r(c J CJ c k(r(c + J CJ where r = 1 16 C + J CJ 2, C 2 = trace( C T C and s k and c k are the functions defined in subsection 4.1. Proof. The existence of the maps follows immediately from Lemma 2.1, Theorem 3.1, and Theorem 3.4. The formula can be derived as in the case of SU(3 or verified by computing ψ k (Aγ(tB 1 = Aγ(ktB 1 for A, B Sp(2. Corollary 5.7. For every m N and every integer l there is a coordinate polynomial selfmap SU(4 SU(4 of degree 8 m (2l Selfmaps of SO(n. We consider the action SO(n 1 SO(n 1 SO(n, (A, B C = ACB 1 where SO(n 1 is embedded in the lower right corner of SO(n. A normal geodesic γ : R SO(n is given by ( cos t sin t 0 γ(t = sin t cos t l where 1l denotes the (n 2 (n 2 identity matrix. The isotropy groups at γ(t with t πz are given by at γ(0 by (SO(n 2 = {(A, A A SO(n 2}, (SO(n 1 = {(A, A A SO(n 1},

18 18 THOMAS PÜTTMANN and at γ(π by (SO(n 1 = {(A, ( 1l l n 2 A ( 1l l n 2 A SO(n 1},. Theorem 5.8. SO(n admits an infinite family of SO(n 1 SO(n 1-equivariant selfmaps ψ k indexed by odd integers k. If n is even, then ψ k has degree k. If n is odd, then ψ k has degree 1. An explicit formula is given by ψ k ( a w T v B = sk (1 a 2 ( a 0 0 B + c k(1 a 2 ( 0 w T v 0 ( + 1 s k(1 a a 2 0 (1 a 2 B+avw T where s k and c k are the functions defined in subsection 4.1. Note that (1 s k (r/r is polynomial in r. Proof. The existence of the maps and their properties follow immediately from Lemma 2.1, Theorem 3.1, and Theorem 3.4. The formulas can be derived as in the case of SU(3 or verified by computing ψ k (Aγ(tB 1 = Aγ(ktB 1 for A, B SO(n 1. Corollary 5.9. For every m N and every integer l there is a coordinate polynomial selfmap SO(2n SO(2n of degree 2 nm (2l + 1. This result is certainly not optimal: SO(4 is diffeomorphic to SO(3 S 3 and hence admits selfmaps of arbitrary degree. The universal covering space of SO(6 is SU(4. This implies that SO(6 does not admit selfmaps of degree 2. We do not know whether SO(6 admits selfmaps of degree Selfmaps of Spin(7 and SO(7. Let H denote the quaternions and O the octonions. As usual, we represent the octonions by pairs of quaternions with the multiplication (u 1, v 1 (u 2, v 2 = (u 1 u 2 v 2 v 1, v 2 u 1 + v 1 ū 2 and the conjugation (u, v = (ū, v. Moreover, we identify the imaginary octonions Im O with R 7 by mapping the orthonormal basis (0, 1, (i, 0, (0, i, (j, 0, (0, j, (k, 0, (0, k of Im O to the standard basis of R 7. The exceptional Lie group G 2 is the group of automorphisms of the octonions. It is a subgroup of SO(7. The action of G 2 on R 7 is transitive on the unit sphere S 6. With our conventions the isotropy group of the first standard basis vector of R 7 is the SU(3 SO(6 in the lower right corner of SO(7, i.e., the set of matrices in SO(6 that commute with We now consider the action G 2 G 2 SO(7 SO(7, (A, B C = ACB 1. The orbit through the unit element 1l SO(7 clearly is the subgroup G 2 SO(7. A normal geodesic γ : R SO(7 with γ(0 = 1l is given by γ(t = ( D(2t D(2t D(2t where D(t = ( cos t sin t sin t cos t denotes the standard 2 2 rotation matrix. Note that γ(t is the matrix that corresponds to conjugation with (cos t, sin t S 7 O on

19 SELFMAPS OF COHOMOGENEITY ONE MANIFOLDS 19 the imaginary octonions and that γ(t G 2 if and only if t Z π 3. Hence the Weyl group of this cohomogeneity one action is D 3. The isotropy groups at γ(t are given by (SU(3 = {(A, A A SU(3}, for t Z π 6, l G 2 = {(A, γ( l π 3 Aγ(jl π 3 A G 2}, for t = l π 3, l ŜU(3 = {(A, γ( l π 3 Aγ(l π 3 A ŜU(3}, for t = π 2 + l π 3 where ŜU(3 = G 2 O(6 is the Z 2 -extension of SU(3 in G 2 by the matrix diag( 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1. We see that the isotropy group at t = π 2 is a subgroup of the isotropy group at t = 0. The action of G 2 G 2 on SO(7 lifts to the action G 2 G 2 Spin(7 Spin(7, (A, B C = ACB 1. The subgroup G 2 SO(7 lifts to two copies of G 2 in Spin(7 (a subgroup and translated copy. Let γ be the lift of γ through the unit element. Then the isotropy groups at γ(t are given by (SU(3 = {(A, A A SU(3}, for t Z π 3, l G 2 = {(A, γ( l π 3 Aγ(jl π 3 A G 2}, for t = l π 3. Note that γ has period 2π. Hence, the Weyl group of the action on Spin(7 is also D 3. The isotropy group at γ(t equals the isotropy group at γ(t + π. Theorem SO(7 and Spin(7 admit infinite familes of G 2 G 2 -equivariant selfmaps φ k indexed by integers of the form k = 3j + 1. The maps φ k have degree k and Lefschetz number 0. Of course, we can compose the maps φ k with the orientation reversing diffeomorphism C C 1 of SO(7 and obtain maps of degree 3j 1. Since the rank of SO(7 is 3 the power maps C C m have degree m 3. Corollary All integers except possibly ±3 3l+1 and ±3 3l+2 for l 0 appear as degrees of selfmaps of SO(7 and Spin(7. References [AA] A. V. Alekseevsky, D. V. Alekseevsky, Riemannian G-manifolds with one-dimensional orbit space, Ann. Global Anal. Geom. 11 (1993, [As] T. Asoh, Compact transformation groups on Z 2 -cohomology spaces with orbit of codimension 1, Hiroshima Math. J. 13 (1983, [Bd1] G. E. Bredon, Introduction to compact transformation groups, Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 46, Academic Press, New York, [Bd2] G. E. Bredon, Topology and Geometry, GTM 139, Springer, New York [DoWh] A. Dold, H. Whitney, Classification of oriented sphere bundles over a 4-complex, Ann. Math. 69 (1959, [DuWa] H. Duan, S. Wang, The degree of maps between manifolds, Math. Z. 244 (2003, [GWZ] K. Grove, B. Wilking, W. Ziller, Positively curved cohomogeneity one manifolds and 3-Sasakian geometry, J. Different. Geom. 78 (2008, [Hoe] C. Hoelscher, Classification of cohomogeneity one manifolds in low dimensions, Ph. D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia [Ho] H. Hopf, Über den Rang geschlossener Liescher Gruppen, Comment. Math. Helv. 13 (1941,

20 20 THOMAS PÜTTMANN [HS] H. Hopf, H. Samelson, Ein Satz über die Wirkungsräume geschlossener Liescher Gruppen, Comment. Math. Helv. 13 (1941, [Iw1] K. Iwata, Classification of compact transformation groups on cohomology quaternion projective spaces with codimension one orbits, Osaka J. Math. 15 (1978, [Iw2] K. Iwata, Compact transformation groups on rational cohomology Cayley projective planes, Tohoku Math. J. 33 (1981, [JW] I. M. James, J. H. C. Whitehead, The homotopy theory of sphere bundles over spheres. I., Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 4 (1954, [Ko] A. Kollross, A classification of hyperpolar and cohomogeneity one actions, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 354 (2002, [Mo] P. S. Mostert, On a compact Lie group acting on a manifold, Ann. of Math. 65 (1957, ; Errata ibid. 66, 589. [Neu] W. D. Neumann, 3-dimensional G-manifolds with 2-dimensional orbits, pp in Proc. Conf. on Transformation Groups (New Orleans, La., 1967, Springer, New York, 1968 [Pa] J. Parker, 4-dimensional G-manifolds with 3-dimensional orbits, Pac. J. Math. 125 (1986, [Uch] F. Uchida, Classification of compact transformation groups on cohomology complex projective spaces with codimension one orbits, Jap. J. Math. 3 (1977, [Zi] W. Ziller, Fatness revisited, unpublished lecture notes, University of Pennsylvania, Universität Bonn, Mathematisches Institut, Beringstr. 1, Bonn, Germany address: puttmann@math.uni-bonn.de

INVARIANT METRICS WITH NONNEGATIVE CURVATURE ON COMPACT LIE GROUPS

INVARIANT METRICS WITH NONNEGATIVE CURVATURE ON COMPACT LIE GROUPS INVARIANT METRICS WITH NONNEGATIVE CURVATURE ON COMPACT LIE GROUPS NATHAN BROWN, RACHEL FINCK, MATTHEW SPENCER, KRISTOPHER TAPP, AND ZHONGTAO WU Abstract. We classify the left-invariant metrics with nonnegative

More information

Invariant Metrics with Nonnegative Curvature on Compact Lie Groups

Invariant Metrics with Nonnegative Curvature on Compact Lie Groups Canad. Math. Bull. Vol. 50 (1), 2007 pp. 24 34 Invariant Metrics with Nonnegative Curvature on Compact Lie Groups Nathan Brown, Rachel Finck, Matthew Spencer, Kristopher Tapp and Zhongtao Wu Abstract.

More information

8.1 Examples, definitions, and basic properties

8.1 Examples, definitions, and basic properties 8 De Rham cohomology Last updated: May 21, 211. 8.1 Examples, definitions, and basic properties A k-form ω Ω k (M) is closed if dω =. It is exact if there is a (k 1)-form σ Ω k 1 (M) such that dσ = ω.

More information

The cover SU(2) SO(3) and related topics

The cover SU(2) SO(3) and related topics The cover SU(2) SO(3) and related topics Iordan Ganev December 2011 Abstract The subgroup U of unit quaternions is isomorphic to SU(2) and is a double cover of SO(3). This allows a simple computation of

More information

Fiber sums of genus 2 Lefschetz fibrations

Fiber sums of genus 2 Lefschetz fibrations Proceedings of 9 th Gökova Geometry-Topology Conference, pp, 1 10 Fiber sums of genus 2 Lefschetz fibrations Denis Auroux Abstract. Using the recent results of Siebert and Tian about the holomorphicity

More information

Sets of Fibre Homotopy Classes and Twisted Order Parameter Spaces

Sets of Fibre Homotopy Classes and Twisted Order Parameter Spaces Communications in Mathematical Physics Manuscript-Nr. (will be inserted by hand later) Sets of Fibre Homotopy Classes and Twisted Order Parameter Spaces Stefan Bechtluft-Sachs, Marco Hien Naturwissenschaftliche

More information

Mathematics Course 111: Algebra I Part IV: Vector Spaces

Mathematics Course 111: Algebra I Part IV: Vector Spaces Mathematics Course 111: Algebra I Part IV: Vector Spaces D. R. Wilkins Academic Year 1996-7 9 Vector Spaces A vector space over some field K is an algebraic structure consisting of a set V on which are

More information

Allen Back. Oct. 29, 2009

Allen Back. Oct. 29, 2009 Allen Back Oct. 29, 2009 Notation:(anachronistic) Let the coefficient ring k be Q in the case of toral ( (S 1 ) n) actions and Z p in the case of Z p tori ( (Z p )). Notation:(anachronistic) Let the coefficient

More information

Singular fibers of stable maps and signatures of 4 manifolds

Singular fibers of stable maps and signatures of 4 manifolds 359 399 359 arxiv version: fonts, pagination and layout may vary from GT published version Singular fibers of stable maps and signatures of 4 manifolds OSAMU SAEKI TAKAHIRO YAMAMOTO We show that for a

More information

Math 231b Lecture 35. G. Quick

Math 231b Lecture 35. G. Quick Math 231b Lecture 35 G. Quick 35. Lecture 35: Sphere bundles and the Adams conjecture 35.1. Sphere bundles. Let X be a connected finite cell complex. We saw that the J-homomorphism could be defined by

More information

THREE DIMENSIONAL GEOMETRY

THREE DIMENSIONAL GEOMETRY Chapter 8 THREE DIMENSIONAL GEOMETRY 8.1 Introduction In this chapter we present a vector algebra approach to three dimensional geometry. The aim is to present standard properties of lines and planes,

More information

Extrinsic geometric flows

Extrinsic geometric flows On joint work with Vladimir Rovenski from Haifa Paweł Walczak Uniwersytet Łódzki CRM, Bellaterra, July 16, 2010 Setting Throughout this talk: (M, F, g 0 ) is a (compact, complete, any) foliated, Riemannian

More information

ISOMETRIES OF R n KEITH CONRAD

ISOMETRIES OF R n KEITH CONRAD ISOMETRIES OF R n KEITH CONRAD 1. Introduction An isometry of R n is a function h: R n R n that preserves the distance between vectors: h(v) h(w) = v w for all v and w in R n, where (x 1,..., x n ) = x

More information

TOPOLOGY OF SINGULAR FIBERS OF GENERIC MAPS

TOPOLOGY OF SINGULAR FIBERS OF GENERIC MAPS TOPOLOGY OF SINGULAR FIBERS OF GENERIC MAPS OSAMU SAEKI Dedicated to Professor Yukio Matsumoto on the occasion of his 60th birthday Abstract. We classify singular fibers of C stable maps of orientable

More information

Fiber bundles and non-abelian cohomology

Fiber bundles and non-abelian cohomology Fiber bundles and non-abelian cohomology Nicolas Addington April 22, 2007 Abstract The transition maps of a fiber bundle are often said to satisfy the cocycle condition. If we take this terminology seriously

More information

The Topology of Fiber Bundles Lecture Notes. Ralph L. Cohen Dept. of Mathematics Stanford University

The Topology of Fiber Bundles Lecture Notes. Ralph L. Cohen Dept. of Mathematics Stanford University The Topology of Fiber Bundles Lecture Notes Ralph L. Cohen Dept. of Mathematics Stanford University Contents Introduction v Chapter 1. Locally Trival Fibrations 1 1. Definitions and examples 1 1.1. Vector

More information

Nonzero degree tangential maps between dual symmetric spaces

Nonzero degree tangential maps between dual symmetric spaces ISSN 1472-2739 (on-line) 1472-2747 (printed) 709 Algebraic & Geometric Topology Volume 1 (2001) 709 718 Published: 30 November 2001 ATG Nonzero degree tangential maps between dual symmetric spaces Boris

More information

Introduction to Algebraic Geometry. Bézout s Theorem and Inflection Points

Introduction to Algebraic Geometry. Bézout s Theorem and Inflection Points Introduction to Algebraic Geometry Bézout s Theorem and Inflection Points 1. The resultant. Let K be a field. Then the polynomial ring K[x] is a unique factorisation domain (UFD). Another example of a

More information

ON GALOIS REALIZATIONS OF THE 2-COVERABLE SYMMETRIC AND ALTERNATING GROUPS

ON GALOIS REALIZATIONS OF THE 2-COVERABLE SYMMETRIC AND ALTERNATING GROUPS ON GALOIS REALIZATIONS OF THE 2-COVERABLE SYMMETRIC AND ALTERNATING GROUPS DANIEL RABAYEV AND JACK SONN Abstract. Let f(x) be a monic polynomial in Z[x] with no rational roots but with roots in Q p for

More information

A NOTE ON TRIVIAL FIBRATIONS

A NOTE ON TRIVIAL FIBRATIONS A NOTE ON TRIVIAL FIBRATIONS Petar Pavešić Fakulteta za Matematiko in Fiziko, Univerza v Ljubljani, Jadranska 19, 1111 Ljubljana, Slovenija petar.pavesic@fmf.uni-lj.si Abstract We study the conditions

More information

Lecture 18 - Clifford Algebras and Spin groups

Lecture 18 - Clifford Algebras and Spin groups Lecture 18 - Clifford Algebras and Spin groups April 5, 2013 Reference: Lawson and Michelsohn, Spin Geometry. 1 Universal Property If V is a vector space over R or C, let q be any quadratic form, meaning

More information

COMMUTATIVITY DEGREES OF WREATH PRODUCTS OF FINITE ABELIAN GROUPS

COMMUTATIVITY DEGREES OF WREATH PRODUCTS OF FINITE ABELIAN GROUPS Bull Austral Math Soc 77 (2008), 31 36 doi: 101017/S0004972708000038 COMMUTATIVITY DEGREES OF WREATH PRODUCTS OF FINITE ABELIAN GROUPS IGOR V EROVENKO and B SURY (Received 12 April 2007) Abstract We compute

More information

COMMUTATIVITY DEGREES OF WREATH PRODUCTS OF FINITE ABELIAN GROUPS

COMMUTATIVITY DEGREES OF WREATH PRODUCTS OF FINITE ABELIAN GROUPS COMMUTATIVITY DEGREES OF WREATH PRODUCTS OF FINITE ABELIAN GROUPS IGOR V. EROVENKO AND B. SURY ABSTRACT. We compute commutativity degrees of wreath products A B of finite abelian groups A and B. When B

More information

How To Prove The Dirichlet Unit Theorem

How To Prove The Dirichlet Unit Theorem Chapter 6 The Dirichlet Unit Theorem As usual, we will be working in the ring B of algebraic integers of a number field L. Two factorizations of an element of B are regarded as essentially the same if

More information

FIXED POINT SETS OF FIBER-PRESERVING MAPS

FIXED POINT SETS OF FIBER-PRESERVING MAPS FIXED POINT SETS OF FIBER-PRESERVING MAPS Robert F. Brown Department of Mathematics University of California Los Angeles, CA 90095 e-mail: rfb@math.ucla.edu Christina L. Soderlund Department of Mathematics

More information

Classification of Bundles

Classification of Bundles CHAPTER 2 Classification of Bundles In this chapter we prove Steenrod s classification theorem of principal G - bundles, and the corresponding classification theorem of vector bundles. This theorem states

More information

PYTHAGOREAN TRIPLES KEITH CONRAD

PYTHAGOREAN TRIPLES KEITH CONRAD PYTHAGOREAN TRIPLES KEITH CONRAD 1. Introduction A Pythagorean triple is a triple of positive integers (a, b, c) where a + b = c. Examples include (3, 4, 5), (5, 1, 13), and (8, 15, 17). Below is an ancient

More information

Generic Polynomials of Degree Three

Generic Polynomials of Degree Three Generic Polynomials of Degree Three Benjamin C. Wallace April 2012 1 Introduction In the nineteenth century, the mathematician Évariste Galois discovered an elegant solution to the fundamental problem

More information

OSTROWSKI FOR NUMBER FIELDS

OSTROWSKI FOR NUMBER FIELDS OSTROWSKI FOR NUMBER FIELDS KEITH CONRAD Ostrowski classified the nontrivial absolute values on Q: up to equivalence, they are the usual (archimedean) absolute value and the p-adic absolute values for

More information

1 Local Brouwer degree

1 Local Brouwer degree 1 Local Brouwer degree Let D R n be an open set and f : S R n be continuous, D S and c R n. Suppose that the set f 1 (c) D is compact. (1) Then the local Brouwer degree of f at c in the set D is defined.

More information

EXERCISES FOR THE COURSE MATH 570, FALL 2010

EXERCISES FOR THE COURSE MATH 570, FALL 2010 EXERCISES FOR THE COURSE MATH 570, FALL 2010 EYAL Z. GOREN (1) Let G be a group and H Z(G) a subgroup such that G/H is cyclic. Prove that G is abelian. Conclude that every group of order p 2 (p a prime

More information

Group Theory. Contents

Group Theory. Contents Group Theory Contents Chapter 1: Review... 2 Chapter 2: Permutation Groups and Group Actions... 3 Orbits and Transitivity... 6 Specific Actions The Right regular and coset actions... 8 The Conjugation

More information

FACTORING POLYNOMIALS IN THE RING OF FORMAL POWER SERIES OVER Z

FACTORING POLYNOMIALS IN THE RING OF FORMAL POWER SERIES OVER Z FACTORING POLYNOMIALS IN THE RING OF FORMAL POWER SERIES OVER Z DANIEL BIRMAJER, JUAN B GIL, AND MICHAEL WEINER Abstract We consider polynomials with integer coefficients and discuss their factorization

More information

GENERATING SETS KEITH CONRAD

GENERATING SETS KEITH CONRAD GENERATING SETS KEITH CONRAD 1 Introduction In R n, every vector can be written as a unique linear combination of the standard basis e 1,, e n A notion weaker than a basis is a spanning set: a set of vectors

More information

1 Symmetries of regular polyhedra

1 Symmetries of regular polyhedra 1230, notes 5 1 Symmetries of regular polyhedra Symmetry groups Recall: Group axioms: Suppose that (G, ) is a group and a, b, c are elements of G. Then (i) a b G (ii) (a b) c = a (b c) (iii) There is an

More information

On the existence of G-equivariant maps

On the existence of G-equivariant maps CADERNOS DE MATEMÁTICA 12, 69 76 May (2011) ARTIGO NÚMERO SMA# 345 On the existence of G-equivariant maps Denise de Mattos * Departamento de Matemática, Instituto de Ciências Matemáticas e de Computação,

More information

Lecture L3 - Vectors, Matrices and Coordinate Transformations

Lecture L3 - Vectors, Matrices and Coordinate Transformations S. Widnall 16.07 Dynamics Fall 2009 Lecture notes based on J. Peraire Version 2.0 Lecture L3 - Vectors, Matrices and Coordinate Transformations By using vectors and defining appropriate operations between

More information

Quantum Mechanics and Representation Theory

Quantum Mechanics and Representation Theory Quantum Mechanics and Representation Theory Peter Woit Columbia University Texas Tech, November 21 2013 Peter Woit (Columbia University) Quantum Mechanics and Representation Theory November 2013 1 / 30

More information

GROUPS WITH TWO EXTREME CHARACTER DEGREES AND THEIR NORMAL SUBGROUPS

GROUPS WITH TWO EXTREME CHARACTER DEGREES AND THEIR NORMAL SUBGROUPS GROUPS WITH TWO EXTREME CHARACTER DEGREES AND THEIR NORMAL SUBGROUPS GUSTAVO A. FERNÁNDEZ-ALCOBER AND ALEXANDER MORETÓ Abstract. We study the finite groups G for which the set cd(g) of irreducible complex

More information

FACTORING AFTER DEDEKIND

FACTORING AFTER DEDEKIND FACTORING AFTER DEDEKIND KEITH CONRAD Let K be a number field and p be a prime number. When we factor (p) = po K into prime ideals, say (p) = p e 1 1 peg g, we refer to the data of the e i s, the exponents

More information

ON GENERALIZED RELATIVE COMMUTATIVITY DEGREE OF A FINITE GROUP. A. K. Das and R. K. Nath

ON GENERALIZED RELATIVE COMMUTATIVITY DEGREE OF A FINITE GROUP. A. K. Das and R. K. Nath International Electronic Journal of Algebra Volume 7 (2010) 140-151 ON GENERALIZED RELATIVE COMMUTATIVITY DEGREE OF A FINITE GROUP A. K. Das and R. K. Nath Received: 12 October 2009; Revised: 15 December

More information

Similarity and Diagonalization. Similar Matrices

Similarity and Diagonalization. Similar Matrices MATH022 Linear Algebra Brief lecture notes 48 Similarity and Diagonalization Similar Matrices Let A and B be n n matrices. We say that A is similar to B if there is an invertible n n matrix P such that

More information

Surface bundles over S 1, the Thurston norm, and the Whitehead link

Surface bundles over S 1, the Thurston norm, and the Whitehead link Surface bundles over S 1, the Thurston norm, and the Whitehead link Michael Landry August 16, 2014 The Thurston norm is a powerful tool for studying the ways a 3-manifold can fiber over the circle. In

More information

THE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF ALGEBRA VIA PROPER MAPS

THE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF ALGEBRA VIA PROPER MAPS THE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF ALGEBRA VIA PROPER MAPS KEITH CONRAD 1. Introduction The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra says every nonconstant polynomial with complex coefficients can be factored into linear

More information

Continued Fractions and the Euclidean Algorithm

Continued Fractions and the Euclidean Algorithm Continued Fractions and the Euclidean Algorithm Lecture notes prepared for MATH 326, Spring 997 Department of Mathematics and Statistics University at Albany William F Hammond Table of Contents Introduction

More information

IRREDUCIBLE OPERATOR SEMIGROUPS SUCH THAT AB AND BA ARE PROPORTIONAL. 1. Introduction

IRREDUCIBLE OPERATOR SEMIGROUPS SUCH THAT AB AND BA ARE PROPORTIONAL. 1. Introduction IRREDUCIBLE OPERATOR SEMIGROUPS SUCH THAT AB AND BA ARE PROPORTIONAL R. DRNOVŠEK, T. KOŠIR Dedicated to Prof. Heydar Radjavi on the occasion of his seventieth birthday. Abstract. Let S be an irreducible

More information

3 Orthogonal Vectors and Matrices

3 Orthogonal Vectors and Matrices 3 Orthogonal Vectors and Matrices The linear algebra portion of this course focuses on three matrix factorizations: QR factorization, singular valued decomposition (SVD), and LU factorization The first

More information

Section 1.1. Introduction to R n

Section 1.1. Introduction to R n The Calculus of Functions of Several Variables Section. Introduction to R n Calculus is the study of functional relationships and how related quantities change with each other. In your first exposure to

More information

4. Expanding dynamical systems

4. Expanding dynamical systems 4.1. Metric definition. 4. Expanding dynamical systems Definition 4.1. Let X be a compact metric space. A map f : X X is said to be expanding if there exist ɛ > 0 and L > 1 such that d(f(x), f(y)) Ld(x,

More information

State of Stress at Point

State of Stress at Point State of Stress at Point Einstein Notation The basic idea of Einstein notation is that a covector and a vector can form a scalar: This is typically written as an explicit sum: According to this convention,

More information

COHOMOLOGY OF GROUPS

COHOMOLOGY OF GROUPS Actes, Congrès intern. Math., 1970. Tome 2, p. 47 à 51. COHOMOLOGY OF GROUPS by Daniel QUILLEN * This is a report of research done at the Institute for Advanced Study the past year. It includes some general

More information

CHAPTER SIX IRREDUCIBILITY AND FACTORIZATION 1. BASIC DIVISIBILITY THEORY

CHAPTER SIX IRREDUCIBILITY AND FACTORIZATION 1. BASIC DIVISIBILITY THEORY January 10, 2010 CHAPTER SIX IRREDUCIBILITY AND FACTORIZATION 1. BASIC DIVISIBILITY THEORY The set of polynomials over a field F is a ring, whose structure shares with the ring of integers many characteristics.

More information

GEOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF PROJECTIVE MANIFOLDS OF SMALL DEGREE

GEOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF PROJECTIVE MANIFOLDS OF SMALL DEGREE GEOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF PROJECTIVE MANIFOLDS OF SMALL DEGREE SIJONG KWAK AND JINHYUNG PARK Abstract. We study geometric structures of smooth projective varieties of small degree in birational geometric

More information

SOME PROPERTIES OF FIBER PRODUCT PRESERVING BUNDLE FUNCTORS

SOME PROPERTIES OF FIBER PRODUCT PRESERVING BUNDLE FUNCTORS SOME PROPERTIES OF FIBER PRODUCT PRESERVING BUNDLE FUNCTORS Ivan Kolář Abstract. Let F be a fiber product preserving bundle functor on the category FM m of the proper base order r. We deduce that the r-th

More information

Table of Contents. Introduction... 1 Chapter 1. Vector Bundles... 4. Chapter 2. K Theory... 38. Chapter 3. Characteristic Classes...

Table of Contents. Introduction... 1 Chapter 1. Vector Bundles... 4. Chapter 2. K Theory... 38. Chapter 3. Characteristic Classes... Table of Contents Introduction.............................. 1 Chapter 1. Vector Bundles.................... 4 1.1. Basic Definitions and Constructions............ 6 Sections 7. Direct Sums 9. Inner Products

More information

1 VECTOR SPACES AND SUBSPACES

1 VECTOR SPACES AND SUBSPACES 1 VECTOR SPACES AND SUBSPACES What is a vector? Many are familiar with the concept of a vector as: Something which has magnitude and direction. an ordered pair or triple. a description for quantities such

More information

FIBER PRODUCTS AND ZARISKI SHEAVES

FIBER PRODUCTS AND ZARISKI SHEAVES FIBER PRODUCTS AND ZARISKI SHEAVES BRIAN OSSERMAN 1. Fiber products and Zariski sheaves We recall the definition of a fiber product: Definition 1.1. Let C be a category, and X, Y, Z objects of C. Fix also

More information

TAME AND WILD FINITE SUBGROUPS OF THE PLANE CREMONA GROUP

TAME AND WILD FINITE SUBGROUPS OF THE PLANE CREMONA GROUP TAME AND WILD FINITE SUBGROUPS OF THE PLANE CREMONA GROUP IGOR V. DOLGACHEV To the memory of Vasily Iskovskikh Abstract. We survey some old and new results about finite subgroups of the Cremona group Cr

More information

Mathematical Physics, Lecture 9

Mathematical Physics, Lecture 9 Mathematical Physics, Lecture 9 Hoshang Heydari Fysikum April 25, 2012 Hoshang Heydari (Fysikum) Mathematical Physics, Lecture 9 April 25, 2012 1 / 42 Table of contents 1 Differentiable manifolds 2 Differential

More information

MICROLOCAL ANALYSIS OF THE BOCHNER-MARTINELLI INTEGRAL

MICROLOCAL ANALYSIS OF THE BOCHNER-MARTINELLI INTEGRAL PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 00, Number 0, Pages 000 000 S 0002-9939(XX)0000-0 MICROLOCAL ANALYSIS OF THE BOCHNER-MARTINELLI INTEGRAL NIKOLAI TARKHANOV AND NIKOLAI VASILEVSKI

More information

Singular fibers of stable maps and signatures of 4 manifolds

Singular fibers of stable maps and signatures of 4 manifolds Geometry & Topology 10 (2006) 359 399 359 Singular fibers of stable maps and signatures of 4 manifolds OSAMU SAEKI TAKAHIRO YAMAMOTO We show that for a C 1 stable map of an oriented 4 manifold into a 3

More information

Row Ideals and Fibers of Morphisms

Row Ideals and Fibers of Morphisms Michigan Math. J. 57 (2008) Row Ideals and Fibers of Morphisms David Eisenbud & Bernd Ulrich Affectionately dedicated to Mel Hochster, who has been an inspiration to us for many years, on the occasion

More information

tr g φ hdvol M. 2 The Euler-Lagrange equation for the energy functional is called the harmonic map equation:

tr g φ hdvol M. 2 The Euler-Lagrange equation for the energy functional is called the harmonic map equation: Notes prepared by Andy Huang (Rice University) In this note, we will discuss some motivating examples to guide us to seek holomorphic objects when dealing with harmonic maps. This will lead us to a brief

More information

Lectures notes on orthogonal matrices (with exercises) 92.222 - Linear Algebra II - Spring 2004 by D. Klain

Lectures notes on orthogonal matrices (with exercises) 92.222 - Linear Algebra II - Spring 2004 by D. Klain Lectures notes on orthogonal matrices (with exercises) 92.222 - Linear Algebra II - Spring 2004 by D. Klain 1. Orthogonal matrices and orthonormal sets An n n real-valued matrix A is said to be an orthogonal

More information

CONSEQUENCES OF THE SYLOW THEOREMS

CONSEQUENCES OF THE SYLOW THEOREMS CONSEQUENCES OF THE SYLOW THEOREMS KEITH CONRAD For a group theorist, Sylow s Theorem is such a basic tool, and so fundamental, that it is used almost without thinking, like breathing. Geoff Robinson 1.

More information

The Ideal Class Group

The Ideal Class Group Chapter 5 The Ideal Class Group We will use Minkowski theory, which belongs to the general area of geometry of numbers, to gain insight into the ideal class group of a number field. We have already mentioned

More information

Finite dimensional C -algebras

Finite dimensional C -algebras Finite dimensional C -algebras S. Sundar September 14, 2012 Throughout H, K stand for finite dimensional Hilbert spaces. 1 Spectral theorem for self-adjoint opertors Let A B(H) and let {ξ 1, ξ 2,, ξ n

More information

Metrics on SO(3) and Inverse Kinematics

Metrics on SO(3) and Inverse Kinematics Mathematical Foundations of Computer Graphics and Vision Metrics on SO(3) and Inverse Kinematics Luca Ballan Institute of Visual Computing Optimization on Manifolds Descent approach d is a ascent direction

More information

RIGIDITY OF HOLOMORPHIC MAPS BETWEEN FIBER SPACES

RIGIDITY OF HOLOMORPHIC MAPS BETWEEN FIBER SPACES RIGIDITY OF HOLOMORPHIC MAPS BETWEEN FIBER SPACES GAUTAM BHARALI AND INDRANIL BISWAS Abstract. In the study of holomorphic maps, the term rigidity refers to certain types of results that give us very specific

More information

7. Some irreducible polynomials

7. Some irreducible polynomials 7. Some irreducible polynomials 7.1 Irreducibles over a finite field 7.2 Worked examples Linear factors x α of a polynomial P (x) with coefficients in a field k correspond precisely to roots α k [1] of

More information

Chapter 4, Arithmetic in F [x] Polynomial arithmetic and the division algorithm.

Chapter 4, Arithmetic in F [x] Polynomial arithmetic and the division algorithm. Chapter 4, Arithmetic in F [x] Polynomial arithmetic and the division algorithm. We begin by defining the ring of polynomials with coefficients in a ring R. After some preliminary results, we specialize

More information

Introduction to Topology

Introduction to Topology Introduction to Topology Tomoo Matsumura November 30, 2010 Contents 1 Topological spaces 3 1.1 Basis of a Topology......................................... 3 1.2 Comparing Topologies.......................................

More information

Classification of Cartan matrices

Classification of Cartan matrices Chapter 7 Classification of Cartan matrices In this chapter we describe a classification of generalised Cartan matrices This classification can be compared as the rough classification of varieties in terms

More information

Samuel Omoloye Ajala

Samuel Omoloye Ajala 49 Kragujevac J. Math. 26 (2004) 49 60. SMOOTH STRUCTURES ON π MANIFOLDS Samuel Omoloye Ajala Department of Mathematics, University of Lagos, Akoka - Yaba, Lagos NIGERIA (Received January 19, 2004) Abstract.

More information

South Carolina College- and Career-Ready (SCCCR) Pre-Calculus

South Carolina College- and Career-Ready (SCCCR) Pre-Calculus South Carolina College- and Career-Ready (SCCCR) Pre-Calculus Key Concepts Arithmetic with Polynomials and Rational Expressions PC.AAPR.2 PC.AAPR.3 PC.AAPR.4 PC.AAPR.5 PC.AAPR.6 PC.AAPR.7 Standards Know

More information

α = u v. In other words, Orthogonal Projection

α = u v. In other words, Orthogonal Projection Orthogonal Projection Given any nonzero vector v, it is possible to decompose an arbitrary vector u into a component that points in the direction of v and one that points in a direction orthogonal to v

More information

A REMARK ON ALMOST MOORE DIGRAPHS OF DEGREE THREE. 1. Introduction and Preliminaries

A REMARK ON ALMOST MOORE DIGRAPHS OF DEGREE THREE. 1. Introduction and Preliminaries Acta Math. Univ. Comenianae Vol. LXVI, 2(1997), pp. 285 291 285 A REMARK ON ALMOST MOORE DIGRAPHS OF DEGREE THREE E. T. BASKORO, M. MILLER and J. ŠIRÁŇ Abstract. It is well known that Moore digraphs do

More information

ORIENTATIONS. Contents

ORIENTATIONS. Contents ORIENTATIONS Contents 1. Generators for H n R n, R n p 1 1. Generators for H n R n, R n p We ended last time by constructing explicit generators for H n D n, S n 1 by using an explicit n-simplex which

More information

Linear algebra and the geometry of quadratic equations. Similarity transformations and orthogonal matrices

Linear algebra and the geometry of quadratic equations. Similarity transformations and orthogonal matrices MATH 30 Differential Equations Spring 006 Linear algebra and the geometry of quadratic equations Similarity transformations and orthogonal matrices First, some things to recall from linear algebra Two

More information

Math 241, Exam 1 Information.

Math 241, Exam 1 Information. Math 241, Exam 1 Information. 9/24/12, LC 310, 11:15-12:05. Exam 1 will be based on: Sections 12.1-12.5, 14.1-14.3. The corresponding assigned homework problems (see http://www.math.sc.edu/ boylan/sccourses/241fa12/241.html)

More information

CURVES WHOSE SECANT DEGREE IS ONE IN POSITIVE CHARACTERISTIC. 1. Introduction

CURVES WHOSE SECANT DEGREE IS ONE IN POSITIVE CHARACTERISTIC. 1. Introduction Acta Math. Univ. Comenianae Vol. LXXXI, 1 (2012), pp. 71 77 71 CURVES WHOSE SECANT DEGREE IS ONE IN POSITIVE CHARACTERISTIC E. BALLICO Abstract. Here we study (in positive characteristic) integral curves

More information

Solutions to TOPICS IN ALGEBRA I.N. HERSTEIN. Part II: Group Theory

Solutions to TOPICS IN ALGEBRA I.N. HERSTEIN. Part II: Group Theory Solutions to TOPICS IN ALGEBRA I.N. HERSTEIN Part II: Group Theory No rights reserved. Any part of this work can be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means. Version: 1.1 Release: Jan 2013

More information

MATRIX ALGEBRA AND SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS. + + x 2. x n. a 11 a 12 a 1n b 1 a 21 a 22 a 2n b 2 a 31 a 32 a 3n b 3. a m1 a m2 a mn b m

MATRIX ALGEBRA AND SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS. + + x 2. x n. a 11 a 12 a 1n b 1 a 21 a 22 a 2n b 2 a 31 a 32 a 3n b 3. a m1 a m2 a mn b m MATRIX ALGEBRA AND SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS 1. SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS AND MATRICES 1.1. Representation of a linear system. The general system of m equations in n unknowns can be written a 11 x 1 + a 12 x 2 +

More information

Notes on Factoring. MA 206 Kurt Bryan

Notes on Factoring. MA 206 Kurt Bryan The General Approach Notes on Factoring MA 26 Kurt Bryan Suppose I hand you n, a 2 digit integer and tell you that n is composite, with smallest prime factor around 5 digits. Finding a nontrivial factor

More information

discuss how to describe points, lines and planes in 3 space.

discuss how to describe points, lines and planes in 3 space. Chapter 2 3 Space: lines and planes In this chapter we discuss how to describe points, lines and planes in 3 space. introduce the language of vectors. discuss various matters concerning the relative position

More information

Chapter 7: Products and quotients

Chapter 7: Products and quotients Chapter 7: Products and quotients Matthew Macauley Department of Mathematical Sciences Clemson University http://www.math.clemson.edu/~macaule/ Math 42, Spring 24 M. Macauley (Clemson) Chapter 7: Products

More information

Geometric Transformations

Geometric Transformations Geometric Transformations Definitions Def: f is a mapping (function) of a set A into a set B if for every element a of A there exists a unique element b of B that is paired with a; this pairing is denoted

More information

SOLUTIONS TO EXERCISES FOR. MATHEMATICS 205A Part 3. Spaces with special properties

SOLUTIONS TO EXERCISES FOR. MATHEMATICS 205A Part 3. Spaces with special properties SOLUTIONS TO EXERCISES FOR MATHEMATICS 205A Part 3 Fall 2008 III. Spaces with special properties III.1 : Compact spaces I Problems from Munkres, 26, pp. 170 172 3. Show that a finite union of compact subspaces

More information

Chapter 13: Basic ring theory

Chapter 13: Basic ring theory Chapter 3: Basic ring theory Matthew Macauley Department of Mathematical Sciences Clemson University http://www.math.clemson.edu/~macaule/ Math 42, Spring 24 M. Macauley (Clemson) Chapter 3: Basic ring

More information

Metric Spaces. Chapter 7. 7.1. Metrics

Metric Spaces. Chapter 7. 7.1. Metrics Chapter 7 Metric Spaces A metric space is a set X that has a notion of the distance d(x, y) between every pair of points x, y X. The purpose of this chapter is to introduce metric spaces and give some

More information

A CONSTRUCTION OF THE UNIVERSAL COVER AS A FIBER BUNDLE

A CONSTRUCTION OF THE UNIVERSAL COVER AS A FIBER BUNDLE A CONSTRUCTION OF THE UNIVERSAL COVER AS A FIBER BUNDLE DANIEL A. RAMRAS In these notes we present a construction of the universal cover of a path connected, locally path connected, and semi-locally simply

More information

Module MA3411: Abstract Algebra Galois Theory Appendix Michaelmas Term 2013

Module MA3411: Abstract Algebra Galois Theory Appendix Michaelmas Term 2013 Module MA3411: Abstract Algebra Galois Theory Appendix Michaelmas Term 2013 D. R. Wilkins Copyright c David R. Wilkins 1997 2013 Contents A Cyclotomic Polynomials 79 A.1 Minimum Polynomials of Roots of

More information

Chapter 17. Orthogonal Matrices and Symmetries of Space

Chapter 17. Orthogonal Matrices and Symmetries of Space Chapter 17. Orthogonal Matrices and Symmetries of Space Take a random matrix, say 1 3 A = 4 5 6, 7 8 9 and compare the lengths of e 1 and Ae 1. The vector e 1 has length 1, while Ae 1 = (1, 4, 7) has length

More information

Solutions to Homework 10

Solutions to Homework 10 Solutions to Homework 1 Section 7., exercise # 1 (b,d): (b) Compute the value of R f dv, where f(x, y) = y/x and R = [1, 3] [, 4]. Solution: Since f is continuous over R, f is integrable over R. Let x

More information

Symplectic structures on fiber bundles

Symplectic structures on fiber bundles Symplectic structures on fiber bundles François Lalonde Université du Québec à Montréal (flalonde@math.uqam.ca) Dusa McDuff State University of New York at Stony Brook (dusa@math.sunysb.edu) Aug 27, 2000,

More information

Lecture 4 Cohomological operations on theories of rational type.

Lecture 4 Cohomological operations on theories of rational type. Lecture 4 Cohomological operations on theories of rational type. 4.1 Main Theorem The Main Result which permits to describe operations from a theory of rational type elsewhere is the following: Theorem

More information

RESULTANT AND DISCRIMINANT OF POLYNOMIALS

RESULTANT AND DISCRIMINANT OF POLYNOMIALS RESULTANT AND DISCRIMINANT OF POLYNOMIALS SVANTE JANSON Abstract. This is a collection of classical results about resultants and discriminants for polynomials, compiled mainly for my own use. All results

More information

14.11. Geodesic Lines, Local Gauss-Bonnet Theorem

14.11. Geodesic Lines, Local Gauss-Bonnet Theorem 14.11. Geodesic Lines, Local Gauss-Bonnet Theorem Geodesics play a very important role in surface theory and in dynamics. One of the main reasons why geodesics are so important is that they generalize

More information

UNIFORMLY DISCONTINUOUS GROUPS OF ISOMETRIES OF THE PLANE

UNIFORMLY DISCONTINUOUS GROUPS OF ISOMETRIES OF THE PLANE UNIFORMLY DISCONTINUOUS GROUPS OF ISOMETRIES OF THE PLANE NINA LEUNG Abstract. This paper discusses 2-dimensional locally Euclidean geometries and how these geometries can describe musical chords. Contents

More information

Ideal Class Group and Units

Ideal Class Group and Units Chapter 4 Ideal Class Group and Units We are now interested in understanding two aspects of ring of integers of number fields: how principal they are (that is, what is the proportion of principal ideals

More information