CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS PROBLEMS ON PARTIAL JB*-TRIPLES
|
|
|
- Harvey Tate
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS PROBLEMS ON PARTIAL JB*-TRIPLES László STACHÓ Bolyai Institute Szeged, Hungary Stacho 13/11/2008, Granada László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 1 / 19
2 PARTIAL JB*-TRIPLES (PJT) (E, E 0, {...}) E Banach with. E 0 closed subspace, {...} : E E 0 E E cont. D (a, b) : x {abx}, a, b E 0 {xay} symmetric bilinear in x, y, conjugate-linear in a id (a, a) Der(E, E 0, {...}), a E 0 Jordan identity {xa{xbx}} = {{aax}bx} D ( (a, a) Her(E, ). ) with Sp(D (a, a)) 0 E0, E 0, {...} E 3 JB*-triple 0 László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 2 / 19
3 PARTIAL JB*-TRIPLES (PJT) (E, E 0, {...}) E Banach with. E 0 closed subspace, {...} : E E 0 E E cont. D (a, b) : x {abx}, a, b E 0 {xay} symmetric bilinear in x, y, conjugate-linear in a id (a, a) Der(E, E 0, {...}), a E 0 Jordan identity {xa{xbx}} = {{aax}bx} D ( (a, a) Her(E, ). ) with Sp(D (a, a)) 0 E0, E 0, {...} E 3 JB*-triple 0 László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 2 / 19
4 PARTIAL JB*-TRIPLES (PJT) (E, E 0, {...}) E Banach with. E 0 closed subspace, {...} : E E 0 E E cont. D (a, b) : x {abx}, a, b E 0 {xay} symmetric bilinear in x, y, conjugate-linear in a id (a, a) Der(E, E 0, {...}), a E 0 Jordan identity {xa{xbx}} = {{aax}bx} D ( (a, a) Her(E, ). ) with Sp(D (a, a)) 0 E0, E 0, {...} E 3 JB*-triple 0 László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 2 / 19
5 PARTIAL JB*-TRIPLES (PJT) (E, E 0, {...}) E Banach with. E 0 closed subspace, {...} : E E 0 E E cont. D (a, b) : x {abx}, a, b E 0 {xay} symmetric bilinear in x, y, conjugate-linear in a id (a, a) Der(E, E 0, {...}), a E 0 Jordan identity {xa{xbx}} = {{aax}bx} D ( (a, a) Her(E, ). ) with Sp(D (a, a)) 0 E0, E 0, {...} E 3 JB*-triple 0 László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 2 / 19
6 CANONICAL PJT OF A CIRCULAR DOMAIN D = e it D, t R circular domain in E = [ inf.carathéodory norm of D at 0 ], E D := aut(d) 0 { } {{ } } compl. hol. vect. fields in D (without loss of gen.) Braun-Kaup-Upmeier 1976:! (E, E D, {...} D ) (Sp ( ) {aa. } D E { D 0 is proved only in 1983!) (a ) } {xax}d x : a E D = aut(d) { } Kaup-Vigué 1990: D E D = symm. points of D Stachó : Sp ( {aa. } D ) 0, Any PJT (E, E 0, {...}) is subtriple of some (E, E D, {...} D ) László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 3 / 19
7 CANONICAL PJT OF A CIRCULAR DOMAIN D = e it D, t R circular domain in E = [ inf.carathéodory norm of D at 0 ], E D := aut(d) 0 { } {{ } } compl. hol. vect. fields in D (without loss of gen.) Braun-Kaup-Upmeier 1976:! (E, E D, {...} D ) (Sp ( ) {aa. } D E { D 0 is proved only in 1983!) (a ) } {xax}d x : a E D = aut(d) { } Kaup-Vigué 1990: D E D = symm. points of D Stachó : Sp ( {aa. } D ) 0, Any PJT (E, E 0, {...}) is subtriple of some (E, E D, {...} D ) László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 3 / 19
8 CANONICAL PJT OF A CIRCULAR DOMAIN D = e it D, t R circular domain in E = [ inf.carathéodory norm of D at 0 ], E D := aut(d) 0 { } {{ } } compl. hol. vect. fields in D (without loss of gen.) Braun-Kaup-Upmeier 1976:! (E, E D, {...} D ) (Sp ( ) {aa. } D E { D 0 is proved only in 1983!) (a ) } {xax}d x : a E D = aut(d) { } Kaup-Vigué 1990: D E D = symm. points of D Stachó : Sp ( {aa. } D ) 0, Any PJT (E, E 0, {...}) is subtriple of some (E, E D, {...} D ) László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 3 / 19
9 CANONICAL PJT OF A CIRCULAR DOMAIN D = e it D, t R circular domain in E = [ inf.carathéodory norm of D at 0 ], E D := aut(d) 0 { } {{ } } compl. hol. vect. fields in D (without loss of gen.) Braun-Kaup-Upmeier 1976:! (E, E D, {...} D ) (Sp ( ) {aa. } D E { D 0 is proved only in 1983!) (a ) } {xax}d x : a E D = aut(d) { } Kaup-Vigué 1990: D E D = symm. points of D Stachó : Sp ( {aa. } D ) 0, Any PJT (E, E 0, {...}) is subtriple of some (E, E D, {...} D ) László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 3 / 19
10 CONSTRUCTION (E, E 0, {...}) PJT, B := Ball 1 (E), B E 0 = D E 0 D ε := a E 0 [ (a ) ] (εb ) {xax} x For ε sufficiently small: D ε bounded circular domain (E, E 0, {...}) subtriple of ( E, E Dε, {...} Dε ) Ψ bounded subgroup in Aut(E, E 0, {...}) = D Ψ-invariant bounded circular domain: (E, E 0, {...}) subtriple of ( E, E D, {...}) László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 4 / 19
11 CONSTRUCTION (E, E 0, {...}) PJT, B := Ball 1 (E), B E 0 = D E 0 D ε := a E 0 [ (a ) ] (εb ) {xax} x For ε sufficiently small: D ε bounded circular domain (E, E 0, {...}) subtriple of ( E, E Dε, {...} Dε ) Ψ bounded subgroup in Aut(E, E 0, {...}) = D Ψ-invariant bounded circular domain: (E, E 0, {...}) subtriple of ( E, E D, {...}) László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 4 / 19
12 CONSTRUCTION (E, E 0, {...}) PJT, B := Ball 1 (E), B E 0 = D E 0 D ε := a E 0 [ (a ) ] (εb ) {xax} x For ε sufficiently small: D ε bounded circular domain (E, E 0, {...}) subtriple of ( E, E Dε, {...} Dε ) Ψ bounded subgroup in Aut(E, E 0, {...}) = D Ψ-invariant bounded circular domain: (E, E 0, {...}) subtriple of ( E, E D, {...}) László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 4 / 19
13 PROBLEM OF BIDUAL FOR A PJT Dineen 1985: D = Ball 1 (E) = (E, ED w, {...} ) with contractive projection P : E U E Barton-Timoney 1985: D symmetric = {...} is separately weakly continuous Genaral D: the proof works for the middle variable only? (E, E w D {...} ) for (E, E D, {...} D ) in general? Continuity properties of {...}? László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 5 / 19
14 PROBLEM OF BIDUAL FOR A PJT Dineen 1985: D = Ball 1 (E) = (E, ED w, {...} ) with contractive projection P : E U E Barton-Timoney 1985: D symmetric = {...} is separately weakly continuous Genaral D: the proof works for the middle variable only? (E, E w D {...} ) for (E, E D, {...} D ) in general? Continuity properties of {...}? László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 5 / 19
15 PROBLEM OF BIDUAL FOR A PJT Dineen 1985: D = Ball 1 (E) = (E, ED w, {...} ) with contractive projection P : E U E Barton-Timoney 1985: D symmetric = {...} is separately weakly continuous Genaral D: the proof works for the middle variable only? (E, E w D {...} ) for (E, E D, {...} D ) in general? Continuity properties of {...}? László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 5 / 19
16 EXTENSION PROBLEM OF INNER DERIVATIONS 0 := Span R { D(a, b) D(b, a) : a, b ED } inner derivations Panou 1990: dim(e) < δ 0 vanishes on E D = δ = 0 Tool: Aut(E, E D, {...} D ) is a compact group (dim(e) < ) Stachó 1996: norm dense grid in E D = similar conclusion Same with quasi-grids (finite subsets of G generate finite dim. closed subtriples) Does every δ 0 0 ED admit a unique extension δ 0 0? In which cases is δ 0 δ 0 continuous? László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 6 / 19
17 EXTENSION PROBLEM OF INNER DERIVATIONS 0 := Span R { D(a, b) D(b, a) : a, b ED } inner derivations Panou 1990: dim(e) < δ 0 vanishes on E D = δ = 0 Tool: Aut(E, E D, {...} D ) is a compact group (dim(e) < ) Stachó 1996: norm dense grid in E D = similar conclusion Same with quasi-grids (finite subsets of G generate finite dim. closed subtriples) Does every δ 0 0 ED admit a unique extension δ 0 0? In which cases is δ 0 δ 0 continuous? László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 6 / 19
18 EXTENSION PROBLEM OF INNER DERIVATIONS 0 := Span R { D(a, b) D(b, a) : a, b ED } inner derivations Panou 1990: dim(e) < δ 0 vanishes on E D = δ = 0 Tool: Aut(E, E D, {...} D ) is a compact group (dim(e) < ) Stachó 1996: norm dense grid in E D = similar conclusion Same with quasi-grids (finite subsets of G generate finite dim. closed subtriples) Does every δ 0 0 ED admit a unique extension δ 0 0? In which cases is δ 0 δ 0 continuous? László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 6 / 19
19 EXTENSION PROBLEM OF INNER DERIVATIONS 0 := Span R { D(a, b) D(b, a) : a, b ED } inner derivations Panou 1990: dim(e) < δ 0 vanishes on E D = δ = 0 Tool: Aut(E, E D, {...} D ) is a compact group (dim(e) < ) Stachó 1996: norm dense grid in E D = similar conclusion Same with quasi-grids (finite subsets of G generate finite dim. closed subtriples) Does every δ 0 0 ED admit a unique extension δ 0 0? In which cases is δ 0 δ 0 continuous? László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 6 / 19
20 TEST OBJECTS: REINHARDT DOMAINS D C n classical Reinhardt domain: D bounded open connected ( ) and (z 1,..., z n ) D { (u1,..., u n ) : u k z k, 1 k n } D Sunada 1974: Description of Aud(D), E D = [ Hilbert balls ] D, D holomorphically equiv. classical Reinhardt domains = L L(C n ) LD + = D + László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 7 / 19
21 TEST OBJECTS: REINHARDT DOMAINS D C n classical Reinhardt domain: D bounded open connected ( ) and (z 1,..., z n ) D { (u1,..., u n ) : u k z k, 1 k n } D Sunada 1974: Description of Aud(D), E D = [ Hilbert balls ] D, D holomorphically equiv. classical Reinhardt domains = L L(C n ) LD + = D + László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 7 / 19
22 GENERALIZED R-DOMAMAINS ( E, Re, ) complex vector lattice, x = max { Re(e it x) : t R } well-defined Complete R-domain: x D {f E : f x } D Barton-Dineen-Timoney 1983: Sunada type theorems in E =[separable Banach space with basis] László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 8 / 19
23 GENERALIZED R-DOMAMAINS ( E, Re, ) complex vector lattice, x = max { Re(e it x) : t R } well-defined Complete R-domain: x D {f E : f x } D Barton-Dineen-Timoney 1983: Sunada type theorems in E =[separable Banach space with basis] László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 8 / 19
24 GENERALIZED R-DOMAMAINS ( E, Re, ) complex vector lattice, x = max { Re(e it x) : t R } well-defined Complete R-domain: x D {f E : f x } D Barton-Dineen-Timoney 1983: Sunada type theorems in E =[separable Banach space with basis] László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 8 / 19
25 CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS (CRD) Vigué 1998: E = C(Ω), Ω compact, r : Ω [1, M] lower semicontinuous D = { f E : f (ω) < r(ω), ω Ω } D is symmetric r is continuous, Aut(D)0 = {f E : f (S) = 0} where S := {ω Ω : r(ω) lim η ω r(η)} Definition (Stachó-Zalar, 2003). CRD bounded complete R-domains in commutative C -algebras Recall: talk in Taiwan Kaohsiang Now: later developments (but no counterexamples) László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 9 / 19
26 CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS (CRD) Vigué 1998: E = C(Ω), Ω compact, r : Ω [1, M] lower semicontinuous D = { f E : f (ω) < r(ω), ω Ω } D is symmetric r is continuous, Aut(D)0 = {f E : f (S) = 0} where S := {ω Ω : r(ω) lim η ω r(η)} Definition (Stachó-Zalar, 2003). CRD bounded complete R-domains in commutative C -algebras Recall: talk in Taiwan Kaohsiang Now: later developments (but no counterexamples) László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 9 / 19
27 CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS (CRD) Vigué 1998: E = C(Ω), Ω compact, r : Ω [1, M] lower semicontinuous D = { f E : f (ω) < r(ω), ω Ω } D is symmetric r is continuous, Aut(D)0 = {f E : f (S) = 0} where S := {ω Ω : r(ω) lim η ω r(η)} Definition (Stachó-Zalar, 2003). CRD bounded complete R-domains in commutative C -algebras Recall: talk in Taiwan Kaohsiang Now: later developments (but no counterexamples) László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 9 / 19
28 CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS (CRD) Vigué 1998: E = C(Ω), Ω compact, r : Ω [1, M] lower semicontinuous D = { f E : f (ω) < r(ω), ω Ω } D is symmetric r is continuous, Aut(D)0 = {f E : f (S) = 0} where S := {ω Ω : r(ω) lim η ω r(η)} Definition (Stachó-Zalar, 2003). CRD bounded complete R-domains in commutative C -algebras Recall: talk in Taiwan Kaohsiang Now: later developments (but no counterexamples) László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 9 / 19
29 CRD in C 0 (Ω) Henceforth Ω locally compact space E := C 0 (Ω), f = f := max f D CRD in E, (E, E D, {...} D ) PJT Remark: Sunada Ω = {1,..., n}; non-convex Thullen domains D = ( f (1) 2 + f (2) p < 1 ) (0 < p < 1)! Ω 0 open Ω : E D = {f E : f (Ω \ Ω 0 ) = 0}. Remark: Ω 0 = E D = {0} trivial Ω 0 = Ω E D = E symmetric László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 10 / 19
30 CRD in C 0 (Ω) Henceforth Ω locally compact space E := C 0 (Ω), f = f := max f D CRD in E, (E, E D, {...} D ) PJT Remark: Sunada Ω = {1,..., n}; non-convex Thullen domains D = ( f (1) 2 + f (2) p < 1 ) (0 < p < 1)! Ω 0 open Ω : E D = {f E : f (Ω \ Ω 0 ) = 0}. Remark: Ω 0 = E D = {0} trivial Ω 0 = Ω E D = E symmetric László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 10 / 19
31 CRD in C 0 (Ω) Henceforth Ω locally compact space E := C 0 (Ω), f = f := max f D CRD in E, (E, E D, {...} D ) PJT Remark: Sunada Ω = {1,..., n}; non-convex Thullen domains D = ( f (1) 2 + f (2) p < 1 ) (0 < p < 1)! Ω 0 open Ω : E D = {f E : f (Ω \ Ω 0 ) = 0}. Remark: Ω 0 = E D = {0} trivial Ω 0 = Ω E D = E symmetric László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 10 / 19
32 CRD in C 0 (Ω) Henceforth Ω locally compact space E := C 0 (Ω), f = f := max f D CRD in E, (E, E D, {...} D ) PJT Remark: Sunada Ω = {1,..., n}; non-convex Thullen domains D = ( f (1) 2 + f (2) p < 1 ) (0 < p < 1)! Ω 0 open Ω : E D = {f E : f (Ω \ Ω 0 ) = 0}. Remark: Ω 0 = E D = {0} trivial Ω 0 = Ω E D = E symmetric László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 10 / 19
33 FORMULA FOR {...} D THEOREM.! [ Ω ω µ ω ] : µ ω 0 Radon measure on Ω 0 total mass of µ ω M := sup 0 x,a,y 1 max{xay} {xay}(ω) = 1 2 x(ω) for x, y E, a E D. ay dµ ω y(ω) ax dµ ω Remark: bidual-free. Nevertheless for fine structure: Stachó-Zalar 2003 (symmetric case with bidualization) László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 11 / 19
34 FORMULA FOR {...} D THEOREM.! [ Ω ω µ ω ] : µ ω 0 Radon measure on Ω 0 total mass of µ ω M := sup 0 x,a,y 1 max{xay} {xay}(ω) = 1 2 x(ω) for x, y E, a E D. ay dµ ω y(ω) ax dµ ω Remark: bidual-free. Nevertheless for fine structure: Stachó-Zalar 2003 (symmetric case with bidualization) László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 11 / 19
35 FORMULA FOR {...} D THEOREM.! [ Ω ω µ ω ] : µ ω 0 Radon measure on Ω 0 total mass of µ ω M := sup 0 x,a,y 1 max{xay} {xay}(ω) = 1 2 x(ω) for x, y E, a E D. ay dµ ω y(ω) ax dµ ω Remark: bidual-free. Nevertheless for fine structure: Stachó-Zalar 2003 (symmetric case with bidualization) László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 11 / 19
36 INGREDIENTS OF PROOF ( C0 (Ω), E } {{ } 0, {...} ) with Reinhardt property: E Ψ Aut(E, E 0, {...}) Ψ := { ψ : ψ = 1 } [ f e iφ f ] : D D, φ bounded C(Ω, R) E D C 0 (Ω 0 ) for some Ω 0 open Ω ψ{xax} D = 2{(ψx)ax} D + {x(ψ)a)x} D {xay} D (ω) = 0 if x(ω) = y(ω) = 0. {xay} 0 if x, a, y 0 Villanueva 2002, Riesz type representation for 3-linear φ : E E 0 E E φ = φ 1 φ 2 φ 1, φ 2 0 László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 12 / 19
37 INGREDIENTS OF PROOF ( C0 (Ω), E } {{ } 0, {...} ) with Reinhardt property: E Ψ Aut(E, E 0, {...}) Ψ := { ψ : ψ = 1 } [ f e iφ f ] : D D, φ bounded C(Ω, R) E D C 0 (Ω 0 ) for some Ω 0 open Ω ψ{xax} D = 2{(ψx)ax} D + {x(ψ)a)x} D {xay} D (ω) = 0 if x(ω) = y(ω) = 0. {xay} 0 if x, a, y 0 Villanueva 2002, Riesz type representation for 3-linear φ : E E 0 E E φ = φ 1 φ 2 φ 1, φ 2 0 László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 12 / 19
38 INGREDIENTS OF PROOF ( C0 (Ω), E } {{ } 0, {...} ) with Reinhardt property: E Ψ Aut(E, E 0, {...}) Ψ := { ψ : ψ = 1 } [ f e iφ f ] : D D, φ bounded C(Ω, R) E D C 0 (Ω 0 ) for some Ω 0 open Ω ψ{xax} D = 2{(ψx)ax} D + {x(ψ)a)x} D {xay} D (ω) = 0 if x(ω) = y(ω) = 0. {xay} 0 if x, a, y 0 Villanueva 2002, Riesz type representation for 3-linear φ : E E 0 E E φ = φ 1 φ 2 φ 1, φ 2 0 László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 12 / 19
39 SYMMETRIC PART Stachó-Zalar 2003: D E D = { f C 0 (Ω 0 ) : } ω Ω i m(ω) f (ω) 2 < 1, i I Π D := { Ω i : i I } partition of Ω, m : Ω R + sup #Ω i <, 0 < inf m sup m(η) < i I i I η Ω i µ ω = η Ω i(η) m(η)δ η for ω Ω 0 Remark: Sunada for Ω 0 finite, D E D = [Hilbert balls] László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 13 / 19
40 SYMMETRIC PART Stachó-Zalar 2003: D E D = { f C 0 (Ω 0 ) : } ω Ω i m(ω) f (ω) 2 < 1, i I Π D := { Ω i : i I } partition of Ω, m : Ω R + sup #Ω i <, 0 < inf m sup m(η) < i I i I η Ω i µ ω = η Ω i(η) m(η)δ η for ω Ω 0 Remark: Sunada for Ω 0 finite, D E D = [Hilbert balls] László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 13 / 19
41 SYMMETRIC PART Stachó-Zalar 2003: D E D = { f C 0 (Ω 0 ) : } ω Ω i m(ω) f (ω) 2 < 1, i I Π D := { Ω i : i I } partition of Ω, m : Ω R + sup #Ω i <, 0 < inf m sup m(η) < i I i I η Ω i µ ω = η Ω i(η) m(η)δ η for ω Ω 0 Remark: Sunada for Ω 0 finite, D E D = [Hilbert balls] László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 13 / 19
42 EXTENSION OF INNER DERIVATIONS THEOREM. (E, E 0, {...}) PJT with Reinhardt property = Proof: M δ M δ E0 (δ 0 ) δx := N {a k b k x} k=1 [ N ] N [ ] 2δx Ωi = m(η) a k (η)b k (η) x Ωi + m(η)x(η)b k (η) a k Ωi η Ω i k=1 k=1η Ω i N δx(ω) = a k (ζ)b k (ζ) dµ ω (ζ) x(ω) for ω Ω \ Ω 0 ζ Ω 0 k=1 Continuity of {...} = sup ω Ω µ ω (Ω 0 ) < N δ E0 It suffices: sup a k (ζ)b k (ζ) Const. inf m ζ Ω 0 k=1 László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 14 / 19
43 EXTENSION OF INNER DERIVATIONS THEOREM. (E, E 0, {...}) PJT with Reinhardt property = Proof: M δ M δ E0 (δ 0 ) δx := N {a k b k x} k=1 [ N ] N [ ] 2δx Ωi = m(η) a k (η)b k (η) x Ωi + m(η)x(η)b k (η) a k Ωi η Ω i k=1 k=1η Ω i N δx(ω) = a k (ζ)b k (ζ) dµ ω (ζ) x(ω) for ω Ω \ Ω 0 ζ Ω 0 k=1 Continuity of {...} = sup ω Ω µ ω (Ω 0 ) < N δ E0 It suffices: sup a k (ζ)b k (ζ) Const. inf m ζ Ω 0 k=1 László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 14 / 19
44 EXTENSION OF INNER DERIVATIONS THEOREM. (E, E 0, {...}) PJT with Reinhardt property = Proof: M δ M δ E0 (δ 0 ) δx := N {a k b k x} k=1 [ N ] N [ ] 2δx Ωi = m(η) a k (η)b k (η) x Ωi + m(η)x(η)b k (η) a k Ωi η Ω i k=1 k=1η Ω i N δx(ω) = a k (ζ)b k (ζ) dµ ω (ζ) x(ω) for ω Ω \ Ω 0 ζ Ω 0 k=1 Continuity of {...} = sup ω Ω µ ω (Ω 0 ) < N δ E0 It suffices: sup a k (ζ)b k (ζ) Const. inf m ζ Ω 0 k=1 László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 14 / 19
45 EXTENSION OF INNER DERIVATIONS THEOREM. (E, E 0, {...}) PJT with Reinhardt property = Proof: M δ M δ E0 (δ 0 ) δx := N {a k b k x} k=1 [ N ] N [ ] 2δx Ωi = m(η) a k (η)b k (η) x Ωi + m(η)x(η)b k (η) a k Ωi η Ω i k=1 k=1η Ω i N δx(ω) = a k (ζ)b k (ζ) dµ ω (ζ) x(ω) for ω Ω \ Ω 0 ζ Ω 0 k=1 Continuity of {...} = sup ω Ω µ ω (Ω 0 ) < N δ E0 It suffices: sup a k (ζ)b k (ζ) Const. inf m ζ Ω 0 k=1 László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 14 / 19
46 PROOF For ω Ω i (i fixed) choose 0 e ω E 0 = C 0 (Ω 0 ): ( 1 = e ω (ω) = max e ω, e ω Ωi \ {ω} ) = 0 2 N δe ω (ω) = [#Ω } {{ } i + 1] m(ω) a ω Ω i } {{ } k (ω)b k (ω) δ E0 ω Ω i k=1 inf m N m(ζ) b k (ζ)a k (ζ) = 2[ e ζ ](ζ) N m(ω) a k (ω)b k (ω) ω Ω i k=1 k=1 k=1 N 2 m(ω) a k (ω)b k (ω) 2 E 0 + E 0 #Ω i + 1 ω Ω i László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 15 / 19
47 PROOF For ω Ω i (i fixed) choose 0 e ω E 0 = C 0 (Ω 0 ): ( 1 = e ω (ω) = max e ω, e ω Ωi \ {ω} ) = 0 2 N δe ω (ω) = [#Ω } {{ } i + 1] m(ω) a ω Ω i } {{ } k (ω)b k (ω) δ E0 ω Ω i k=1 inf m N m(ζ) b k (ζ)a k (ζ) = 2[ e ζ ](ζ) N m(ω) a k (ω)b k (ω) ω Ω i k=1 k=1 k=1 N 2 m(ω) a k (ω)b k (ω) 2 E 0 + E 0 #Ω i + 1 ω Ω i László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 15 / 19
48 PROOF For ω Ω i (i fixed) choose 0 e ω E 0 = C 0 (Ω 0 ): ( 1 = e ω (ω) = max e ω, e ω Ωi \ {ω} ) = 0 2 N δe ω (ω) = [#Ω } {{ } i + 1] m(ω) a ω Ω i } {{ } k (ω)b k (ω) δ E0 ω Ω i k=1 inf m N m(ζ) b k (ζ)a k (ζ) = 2[ e ζ ](ζ) N m(ω) a k (ω)b k (ω) ω Ω i k=1 k=1 k=1 N 2 m(ω) a k (ω)b k (ω) 2 E 0 + E 0 #Ω i + 1 ω Ω i László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 15 / 19
49 PROOF For ω Ω i (i fixed) choose 0 e ω E 0 = C 0 (Ω 0 ): ( 1 = e ω (ω) = max e ω, e ω Ωi \ {ω} ) = 0 2 N δe ω (ω) = [#Ω } {{ } i + 1] m(ω) a ω Ω i } {{ } k (ω)b k (ω) δ E0 ω Ω i k=1 inf m N m(ζ) b k (ζ)a k (ζ) = 2[ e ζ ](ζ) N m(ω) a k (ω)b k (ω) ω Ω i k=1 k=1 k=1 N 2 m(ω) a k (ω)b k (ω) 2 E 0 + E 0 #Ω i + 1 ω Ω i László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 15 / 19
50 FINE STRUCTURE E = C 0 (Ω), E 0 = C 0 (Ω 0 ), m : Ω 0 R +, 0 < inf m sup m < Π = {Ω i : i I } partition of Ω 0, κ ω sup i I #Ω i < ( 0 Radon measure on I K I open: i K Ω ) i open Ω 0 {xax}(ω) := x(ω) m(ζ)a(ζ)x(ζ) dκ ω (i) i I ζ Ω i { }} { E(Ω, Ω 0, m, Π, κ) := (E, E 0, {...}) with κ ω = δ i(ω) for ω Ω 0 THEOREM. E(Ω, Ω 0, m, Π, κ) subtriple of E, E D, {...} D ) for some CRD D iff 1) Ω 0 ω η Ω i(ω) m(η)f (η) continuous f E 0, 2) ω κ ω weakly continuous László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 16 / 19
51 FINE STRUCTURE E = C 0 (Ω), E 0 = C 0 (Ω 0 ), m : Ω 0 R +, 0 < inf m sup m < Π = {Ω i : i I } partition of Ω 0, κ ω sup i I #Ω i < ( 0 Radon measure on I K I open: i K Ω ) i open Ω 0 {xax}(ω) := x(ω) m(ζ)a(ζ)x(ζ) dκ ω (i) i I ζ Ω i { }} { E(Ω, Ω 0, m, Π, κ) := (E, E 0, {...}) with κ ω = δ i(ω) for ω Ω 0 THEOREM. E(Ω, Ω 0, m, Π, κ) subtriple of E, E D, {...} D ) for some CRD D iff 1) Ω 0 ω η Ω i(ω) m(η)f (η) continuous f E 0, 2) ω κ ω weakly continuous László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 16 / 19
52 FINE STRUCTURE E = C 0 (Ω), E 0 = C 0 (Ω 0 ), m : Ω 0 R +, 0 < inf m sup m < Π = {Ω i : i I } partition of Ω 0, κ ω sup i I #Ω i < ( 0 Radon measure on I K I open: i K Ω ) i open Ω 0 {xax}(ω) := x(ω) m(ζ)a(ζ)x(ζ) dκ ω (i) i I ζ Ω i { }} { E(Ω, Ω 0, m, Π, κ) := (E, E 0, {...}) with κ ω = δ i(ω) for ω Ω 0 THEOREM. E(Ω, Ω 0, m, Π, κ) subtriple of E, E D, {...} D ) for some CRD D iff 1) Ω 0 ω η Ω i(ω) m(η)f (η) continuous f E 0, 2) ω κ ω weakly continuous László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 16 / 19
53 FINE STRUCTURE E = C 0 (Ω), E 0 = C 0 (Ω 0 ), m : Ω 0 R +, 0 < inf m sup m < Π = {Ω i : i I } partition of Ω 0, κ ω sup i I #Ω i < ( 0 Radon measure on I K I open: i K Ω ) i open Ω 0 {xax}(ω) := x(ω) m(ζ)a(ζ)x(ζ) dκ ω (i) i I ζ Ω i { }} { E(Ω, Ω 0, m, Π, κ) := (E, E 0, {...}) with κ ω = δ i(ω) for ω Ω 0 THEOREM. E(Ω, Ω 0, m, Π, κ) subtriple of E, E D, {...} D ) for some CRD D iff 1) Ω 0 ω η Ω i(ω) m(η)f (η) continuous f E 0, 2) ω κ ω weakly continuous László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 16 / 19
54 FINE STRUCTURE E = C 0 (Ω), E 0 = C 0 (Ω 0 ), m : Ω 0 R +, 0 < inf m sup m < Π = {Ω i : i I } partition of Ω 0, κ ω sup i I #Ω i < ( 0 Radon measure on I K I open: i K Ω ) i open Ω 0 {xax}(ω) := x(ω) m(ζ)a(ζ)x(ζ) dκ ω (i) i I ζ Ω i { }} { E(Ω, Ω 0, m, Π, κ) := (E, E 0, {...}) with κ ω = δ i(ω) for ω Ω 0 THEOREM. E(Ω, Ω 0, m, Π, κ) subtriple of E, E D, {...} D ) for some CRD D iff 1) Ω 0 ω η Ω i(ω) m(η)f (η) continuous f E 0, 2) ω κ ω weakly continuous László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 16 / 19
55 FINE STRUCTURE E = C 0 (Ω), E 0 = C 0 (Ω 0 ), m : Ω 0 R +, 0 < inf m sup m < Π = {Ω i : i I } partition of Ω 0, κ ω sup i I #Ω i < ( 0 Radon measure on I K I open: i K Ω ) i open Ω 0 {xax}(ω) := x(ω) m(ζ)a(ζ)x(ζ) dκ ω (i) i I ζ Ω i { }} { E(Ω, Ω 0, m, Π, κ) := (E, E 0, {...}) with κ ω = δ i(ω) for ω Ω 0 THEOREM. E(Ω, Ω 0, m, Π, κ) subtriple of E, E D, {...} D ) for some CRD D iff 1) Ω 0 ω η Ω i(ω) m(η)f (η) continuous f E 0, 2) ω κ ω weakly continuous László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 16 / 19
56 FINE STRUCTURE E = C 0 (Ω), E 0 = C 0 (Ω 0 ), m : Ω 0 R +, 0 < inf m sup m < Π = {Ω i : i I } partition of Ω 0, κ ω sup i I #Ω i < ( 0 Radon measure on I K I open: i K Ω ) i open Ω 0 {xax}(ω) := x(ω) m(ζ)a(ζ)x(ζ) dκ ω (i) i I ζ Ω i { }} { E(Ω, Ω 0, m, Π, κ) := (E, E 0, {...}) with κ ω = δ i(ω) for ω Ω 0 THEOREM. E(Ω, Ω 0, m, Π, κ) subtriple of E, E D, {...} D ) for some CRD D iff 1) Ω 0 ω η Ω i(ω) m(η)f (η) continuous f E 0, 2) ω κ ω weakly continuous László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 16 / 19
57 BIDUAL EMBEDDING Recall: E = C 0 (Ω) C( Ω), Ω Ω compact hyperstonian THEOREM. Let D be a CRD in E = C 0 (Ω). Then there exists a CRD D in E := E C( Ω) such that ( ) 1) (E, E D, {...} D ) is a subtriple of E, ED, {...} D 2) E D is the weak*-closure of E in E 3) {...} D is the separately weak*-continuous extension of {...} D. László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 17 / 19
58 BIDUAL EMBEDDING Recall: E = C 0 (Ω) C( Ω), Ω Ω compact hyperstonian THEOREM. Let D be a CRD in E = C 0 (Ω). Then there exists a CRD D in E := E C( Ω) such that ( ) 1) (E, E D, {...} D ) is a subtriple of E, ED, {...} D 2) E D is the weak*-closure of E in E 3) {...} D is the separately weak*-continuous extension of {...} D. László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 17 / 19
59 BIDUAL EMBEDDING Recall: E = C 0 (Ω) C( Ω), Ω Ω compact hyperstonian THEOREM. Let D be a CRD in E = C 0 (Ω). Then there exists a CRD D in E := E C( Ω) such that ( ) 1) (E, E D, {...} D ) is a subtriple of E, ED, {...} D 2) E D is the weak*-closure of E in E 3) {...} D is the separately weak*-continuous extension of {...} D. László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 17 / 19
60 BIDUAL EMBEDDING Recall: E = C 0 (Ω) C( Ω), Ω Ω compact hyperstonian THEOREM. Let D be a CRD in E = C 0 (Ω). Then there exists a CRD D in E := E C( Ω) such that ( ) 1) (E, E D, {...} D ) is a subtriple of E, ED, {...} D 2) E D is the weak*-closure of E in E 3) {...} D is the separately weak*-continuous extension of {...} D. László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 17 / 19
61 BIDUAL EMBEDDING Recall: E = C 0 (Ω) C( Ω), Ω Ω compact hyperstonian THEOREM. Let D be a CRD in E = C 0 (Ω). Then there exists a CRD D in E := E C( Ω) such that ( ) 1) (E, E D, {...} D ) is a subtriple of E, ED, {...} D 2) E D is the weak*-closure of E in E 3) {...} D is the separately weak*-continuous extension of {...} D. László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 17 / 19
62 OWN REFERENCES (CRD) L.L. Stachó, Continuous Reinhardt-domains from a Jordan view point, Studia Math. 185(2), (2008). L.L. Stachó, Banach Stone type theorem for lattice norms in C 0 -spaces, Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged) 73, (2007). J.M. Isidro - L.L. Stachó, Holomorphic invariants of continuous bounded symmetric Reinhardt domains, Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged) 71, (2004). L.L. Stachó and B. Zalar, Symmetric continuous Reinhardt domains, Archiv der Math.(Basel) 81, (2003). László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 18 / 19
63 OWN REFERENCES (PJT) L.L. Stachó, On the classification of bounded circular domains, Proc. R. Ir. Acad. 91A(2), (1991). L.L. Stachó, On the spectrum of inner derivations in partial Jordan triples, Math. Scandinavica 66, (1990). L.L. Stachó, On the structure of inner derivations in partial Jordan-triple algebras, Acta Sci. Math.(60), (1995). László STACHÓ () CONTINUOUS REINHARDT DOMAINS 13/11/2008, Granada 19 / 19
FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES: QUOTIENT SPACES
FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES: QUOTIENT SPACES CHRISTOPHER HEIL 1. Cosets and the Quotient Space Any vector space is an abelian group under the operation of vector addition. So, if you are have studied
Let H and J be as in the above lemma. The result of the lemma shows that the integral
Let and be as in the above lemma. The result of the lemma shows that the integral ( f(x, y)dy) dx is well defined; we denote it by f(x, y)dydx. By symmetry, also the integral ( f(x, y)dx) dy is well defined;
Geometrical Characterization of RN-operators between Locally Convex Vector Spaces
Geometrical Characterization of RN-operators between Locally Convex Vector Spaces OLEG REINOV St. Petersburg State University Dept. of Mathematics and Mechanics Universitetskii pr. 28, 198504 St, Petersburg
Finitely Additive Dynamic Programming and Stochastic Games. Bill Sudderth University of Minnesota
Finitely Additive Dynamic Programming and Stochastic Games Bill Sudderth University of Minnesota 1 Discounted Dynamic Programming Five ingredients: S, A, r, q, β. S - state space A - set of actions q(
1. Let X and Y be normed spaces and let T B(X, Y ).
Uppsala Universitet Matematiska Institutionen Andreas Strömbergsson Prov i matematik Funktionalanalys Kurs: NVP, Frist. 2005-03-14 Skrivtid: 9 11.30 Tillåtna hjälpmedel: Manuella skrivdon, Kreyszigs bok
INTEGRAL OPERATORS ON THE PRODUCT OF C(K) SPACES
INTEGRAL OPERATORS ON THE PRODUCT OF C(K) SPACES FERNANDO BOMBAL AND IGNACIO VILLANUEVA Abstract. We study and characterize the integral multilinear operators on a product of C(K) spaces in terms of the
and s n (x) f(x) for all x and s.t. s n is measurable if f is. REAL ANALYSIS Measures. A (positive) measure on a measurable space
RAL ANALYSIS A survey of MA 641-643, UAB 1999-2000 M. Griesemer Throughout these notes m denotes Lebesgue measure. 1. Abstract Integration σ-algebras. A σ-algebra in X is a non-empty collection of subsets
MICROLOCAL ANALYSIS OF THE BOCHNER-MARTINELLI INTEGRAL
PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 00, Number 0, Pages 000 000 S 0002-9939(XX)0000-0 MICROLOCAL ANALYSIS OF THE BOCHNER-MARTINELLI INTEGRAL NIKOLAI TARKHANOV AND NIKOLAI VASILEVSKI
BANACH AND HILBERT SPACE REVIEW
BANACH AND HILBET SPACE EVIEW CHISTOPHE HEIL These notes will briefly review some basic concepts related to the theory of Banach and Hilbert spaces. We are not trying to give a complete development, but
The Positive Supercyclicity Theorem
E extracta mathematicae Vol. 19, Núm. 1, 145 149 (2004) V Curso Espacios de Banach y Operadores. Laredo, Agosto de 2003. The Positive Supercyclicity Theorem F. León Saavedra Departamento de Matemáticas,
FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES CHAPTER 2. OPERATORS ON HILBERT SPACES
FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES CHAPTER 2. OPERATORS ON HILBERT SPACES CHRISTOPHER HEIL 1. Elementary Properties and Examples First recall the basic definitions regarding operators. Definition 1.1 (Continuous
Lecture Notes on Measure Theory and Functional Analysis
Lecture Notes on Measure Theory and Functional Analysis P. Cannarsa & T. D Aprile Dipartimento di Matematica Università di Roma Tor Vergata [email protected] [email protected] aa 2006/07 Contents
Høgskolen i Narvik Sivilingeniørutdanningen STE6237 ELEMENTMETODER. Oppgaver
Høgskolen i Narvik Sivilingeniørutdanningen STE637 ELEMENTMETODER Oppgaver Klasse: 4.ID, 4.IT Ekstern Professor: Gregory A. Chechkin e-mail: [email protected] Narvik 6 PART I Task. Consider two-point
16.3 Fredholm Operators
Lectures 16 and 17 16.3 Fredholm Operators A nice way to think about compact operators is to show that set of compact operators is the closure of the set of finite rank operator in operator norm. In this
Introduction to Topology
Introduction to Topology Tomoo Matsumura November 30, 2010 Contents 1 Topological spaces 3 1.1 Basis of a Topology......................................... 3 1.2 Comparing Topologies.......................................
Metric Spaces. Chapter 7. 7.1. Metrics
Chapter 7 Metric Spaces A metric space is a set X that has a notion of the distance d(x, y) between every pair of points x, y X. The purpose of this chapter is to introduce metric spaces and give some
Notes on metric spaces
Notes on metric spaces 1 Introduction The purpose of these notes is to quickly review some of the basic concepts from Real Analysis, Metric Spaces and some related results that will be used in this course.
MEASURE AND INTEGRATION. Dietmar A. Salamon ETH Zürich
MEASURE AND INTEGRATION Dietmar A. Salamon ETH Zürich 12 May 2016 ii Preface This book is based on notes for the lecture course Measure and Integration held at ETH Zürich in the spring semester 2014. Prerequisites
Some representability and duality results for convex mixed-integer programs.
Some representability and duality results for convex mixed-integer programs. Santanu S. Dey Joint work with Diego Morán and Juan Pablo Vielma December 17, 2012. Introduction About Motivation Mixed integer
1. Let P be the space of all polynomials (of one real variable and with real coefficients) with the norm
Uppsala Universitet Matematiska Institutionen Andreas Strömbergsson Prov i matematik Funktionalanalys Kurs: F3B, F4Sy, NVP 005-06-15 Skrivtid: 9 14 Tillåtna hjälpmedel: Manuella skrivdon, Kreyszigs bok
9 More on differentiation
Tel Aviv University, 2013 Measure and category 75 9 More on differentiation 9a Finite Taylor expansion............... 75 9b Continuous and nowhere differentiable..... 78 9c Differentiable and nowhere monotone......
1 Norms and Vector Spaces
008.10.07.01 1 Norms and Vector Spaces Suppose we have a complex vector space V. A norm is a function f : V R which satisfies (i) f(x) 0 for all x V (ii) f(x + y) f(x) + f(y) for all x,y V (iii) f(λx)
How To Prove The Dirichlet Unit Theorem
Chapter 6 The Dirichlet Unit Theorem As usual, we will be working in the ring B of algebraic integers of a number field L. Two factorizations of an element of B are regarded as essentially the same if
No: 10 04. Bilkent University. Monotonic Extension. Farhad Husseinov. Discussion Papers. Department of Economics
No: 10 04 Bilkent University Monotonic Extension Farhad Husseinov Discussion Papers Department of Economics The Discussion Papers of the Department of Economics are intended to make the initial results
RANDOM INTERVAL HOMEOMORPHISMS. MICHA L MISIUREWICZ Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis
RANDOM INTERVAL HOMEOMORPHISMS MICHA L MISIUREWICZ Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis This is a joint work with Lluís Alsedà Motivation: A talk by Yulij Ilyashenko. Two interval maps, applied
MATH 423 Linear Algebra II Lecture 38: Generalized eigenvectors. Jordan canonical form (continued).
MATH 423 Linear Algebra II Lecture 38: Generalized eigenvectors Jordan canonical form (continued) Jordan canonical form A Jordan block is a square matrix of the form λ 1 0 0 0 0 λ 1 0 0 0 0 λ 0 0 J = 0
Asymptotic Behaviour and Cyclic Properties of Tree-shift Operators
Asymptotic Behaviour and Cyclic Properties of Tree-shift Operators University of Szeged, Bolyai Institute 29th July 2013, Gothenburg Banach Algebras and Applications 1 Introduction, Motivation Directed
ON COMPLETELY CONTINUOUS INTEGRATION OPERATORS OF A VECTOR MEASURE. 1. Introduction
ON COMPLETELY CONTINUOUS INTEGRATION OPERATORS OF A VECTOR MEASURE J.M. CALABUIG, J. RODRÍGUEZ, AND E.A. SÁNCHEZ-PÉREZ Abstract. Let m be a vector measure taking values in a Banach space X. We prove that
ALMOST COMMON PRIORS 1. INTRODUCTION
ALMOST COMMON PRIORS ZIV HELLMAN ABSTRACT. What happens when priors are not common? We introduce a measure for how far a type space is from having a common prior, which we term prior distance. If a type
Separation Properties for Locally Convex Cones
Journal of Convex Analysis Volume 9 (2002), No. 1, 301 307 Separation Properties for Locally Convex Cones Walter Roth Department of Mathematics, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong BE1410, Brunei Darussalam
MATH 425, PRACTICE FINAL EXAM SOLUTIONS.
MATH 45, PRACTICE FINAL EXAM SOLUTIONS. Exercise. a Is the operator L defined on smooth functions of x, y by L u := u xx + cosu linear? b Does the answer change if we replace the operator L by the operator
Lecture 1: Schur s Unitary Triangularization Theorem
Lecture 1: Schur s Unitary Triangularization Theorem This lecture introduces the notion of unitary equivalence and presents Schur s theorem and some of its consequences It roughly corresponds to Sections
Row Ideals and Fibers of Morphisms
Michigan Math. J. 57 (2008) Row Ideals and Fibers of Morphisms David Eisenbud & Bernd Ulrich Affectionately dedicated to Mel Hochster, who has been an inspiration to us for many years, on the occasion
Finite dimensional C -algebras
Finite dimensional C -algebras S. Sundar September 14, 2012 Throughout H, K stand for finite dimensional Hilbert spaces. 1 Spectral theorem for self-adjoint opertors Let A B(H) and let {ξ 1, ξ 2,, ξ n
Hedging bounded claims with bounded outcomes
Hedging bounded claims with bounded outcomes Freddy Delbaen ETH Zürich, Department of Mathematics, CH-892 Zurich, Switzerland Abstract. We consider a financial market with two or more separate components
NOTES ON LINEAR TRANSFORMATIONS
NOTES ON LINEAR TRANSFORMATIONS Definition 1. Let V and W be vector spaces. A function T : V W is a linear transformation from V to W if the following two properties hold. i T v + v = T v + T v for all
Recall that two vectors in are perpendicular or orthogonal provided that their dot
Orthogonal Complements and Projections Recall that two vectors in are perpendicular or orthogonal provided that their dot product vanishes That is, if and only if Example 1 The vectors in are orthogonal
Cross product and determinants (Sect. 12.4) Two main ways to introduce the cross product
Cross product and determinants (Sect. 12.4) Two main ways to introduce the cross product Geometrical definition Properties Expression in components. Definition in components Properties Geometrical expression.
FINITE DIMENSIONAL ORDERED VECTOR SPACES WITH RIESZ INTERPOLATION AND EFFROS-SHEN S UNIMODULARITY CONJECTURE AARON TIKUISIS
FINITE DIMENSIONAL ORDERED VECTOR SPACES WITH RIESZ INTERPOLATION AND EFFROS-SHEN S UNIMODULARITY CONJECTURE AARON TIKUISIS Abstract. It is shown that, for any field F R, any ordered vector space structure
JORDAN WEAK AMENABILITY AND ORTHOGONAL FORMS ON JB -ALGEBRAS
Banach J. Math. Anal. 9 (2015, no. 4, 126 145 http://doi.org/10.15352/bjma/09-4-8 ISSN: 1735-8787 (electronic http://projecteuclid.org/bjma JORDAN WEAK AMENABILITY AND ORTHOGONAL FORMS ON JB -ALGEBRAS
Finite dimensional topological vector spaces
Chapter 3 Finite dimensional topological vector spaces 3.1 Finite dimensional Hausdorff t.v.s. Let X be a vector space over the field K of real or complex numbers. We know from linear algebra that the
Duality of linear conic problems
Duality of linear conic problems Alexander Shapiro and Arkadi Nemirovski Abstract It is well known that the optimal values of a linear programming problem and its dual are equal to each other if at least
Modern Optimization Methods for Big Data Problems MATH11146 The University of Edinburgh
Modern Optimization Methods for Big Data Problems MATH11146 The University of Edinburgh Peter Richtárik Week 3 Randomized Coordinate Descent With Arbitrary Sampling January 27, 2016 1 / 30 The Problem
Chapter 5. Banach Spaces
9 Chapter 5 Banach Spaces Many linear equations may be formulated in terms of a suitable linear operator acting on a Banach space. In this chapter, we study Banach spaces and linear operators acting on
Two-Stage Stochastic Linear Programs
Two-Stage Stochastic Linear Programs Operations Research Anthony Papavasiliou 1 / 27 Two-Stage Stochastic Linear Programs 1 Short Reviews Probability Spaces and Random Variables Convex Analysis 2 Deterministic
Some other convex-valued selection theorems 147 (2) Every lower semicontinuous mapping F : X! IR such that for every x 2 X, F (x) is either convex and
PART B: RESULTS x1. CHARACTERIZATION OF NORMALITY- TYPE PROPERTIES 1. Some other convex-valued selection theorems In this section all multivalued mappings are assumed to have convex values in some Banach
1 = (a 0 + b 0 α) 2 + + (a m 1 + b m 1 α) 2. for certain elements a 0,..., a m 1, b 0,..., b m 1 of F. Multiplying out, we obtain
Notes on real-closed fields These notes develop the algebraic background needed to understand the model theory of real-closed fields. To understand these notes, a standard graduate course in algebra is
MATH 304 Linear Algebra Lecture 9: Subspaces of vector spaces (continued). Span. Spanning set.
MATH 304 Linear Algebra Lecture 9: Subspaces of vector spaces (continued). Span. Spanning set. Vector space A vector space is a set V equipped with two operations, addition V V (x,y) x + y V and scalar
SINTESI DELLA TESI. Enriques-Kodaira classification of Complex Algebraic Surfaces
Università degli Studi Roma Tre Facoltà di Scienze Matematiche, Fisiche e Naturali Corso di Laurea Magistrale in Matematica SINTESI DELLA TESI Enriques-Kodaira classification of Complex Algebraic Surfaces
Inner Product Spaces
Math 571 Inner Product Spaces 1. Preliminaries An inner product space is a vector space V along with a function, called an inner product which associates each pair of vectors u, v with a scalar u, v, and
17. Inner product spaces Definition 17.1. Let V be a real vector space. An inner product on V is a function
17. Inner product spaces Definition 17.1. Let V be a real vector space. An inner product on V is a function, : V V R, which is symmetric, that is u, v = v, u. bilinear, that is linear (in both factors):
How To Prove The Cellosauric Cardinal Compactness (For A Cardinal Cardinal Compact)
Cellular objects and Shelah s singular compactness theorem Logic Colloquium 2015 Helsinki Tibor Beke 1 Jiří Rosický 2 1 University of Massachusetts tibor [email protected] 2 Masaryk University Brno [email protected]
Matrix Representations of Linear Transformations and Changes of Coordinates
Matrix Representations of Linear Transformations and Changes of Coordinates 01 Subspaces and Bases 011 Definitions A subspace V of R n is a subset of R n that contains the zero element and is closed under
INDISTINGUISHABILITY OF ABSOLUTELY CONTINUOUS AND SINGULAR DISTRIBUTIONS
INDISTINGUISHABILITY OF ABSOLUTELY CONTINUOUS AND SINGULAR DISTRIBUTIONS STEVEN P. LALLEY AND ANDREW NOBEL Abstract. It is shown that there are no consistent decision rules for the hypothesis testing problem
A CHARACTERIZATION OF C k (X) FOR X NORMAL AND REALCOMPACT
Bol. Soc. Mat. Mexicana (3) Vol. 12, 2006 A CHARACTERIZATION OF C k (X) FOR X NORMAL AND REALCOMPACT F. MONTALVO, A. A. PULGARÍN AND B. REQUEJO Abstract. We present some internal conditions on a locally
Metric Spaces. Chapter 1
Chapter 1 Metric Spaces Many of the arguments you have seen in several variable calculus are almost identical to the corresponding arguments in one variable calculus, especially arguments concerning convergence
Chapter 2. Parameterized Curves in R 3
Chapter 2. Parameterized Curves in R 3 Def. A smooth curve in R 3 is a smooth map σ : (a, b) R 3. For each t (a, b), σ(t) R 3. As t increases from a to b, σ(t) traces out a curve in R 3. In terms of components,
Orthogonal Diagonalization of Symmetric Matrices
MATH10212 Linear Algebra Brief lecture notes 57 Gram Schmidt Process enables us to find an orthogonal basis of a subspace. Let u 1,..., u k be a basis of a subspace V of R n. We begin the process of finding
arxiv:0804.1733v1 [math.fa] 10 Apr 2008
PUSH-OUTS OF DERIVTIONS arxiv:0804.1733v1 [math.f] 10 pr 2008 Niels Grønbæk bstract. Let be a Banach algebra and let X be a Banach -bimodule. In studying H 1 (, X) it is often useful to extend a given
Erdős on polynomials
Erdős on polynomials Vilmos Totik University of Szeged and University of South Florida [email protected] Vilmos Totik (SZTE and USF) Polynomials 1 / * Erdős on polynomials Vilmos Totik (SZTE and USF)
MATH1231 Algebra, 2015 Chapter 7: Linear maps
MATH1231 Algebra, 2015 Chapter 7: Linear maps A/Prof. Daniel Chan School of Mathematics and Statistics University of New South Wales [email protected] Daniel Chan (UNSW) MATH1231 Algebra 1 / 43 Chapter
F. ABTAHI and M. ZARRIN. (Communicated by J. Goldstein)
Journal of Algerian Mathematical Society Vol. 1, pp. 1 6 1 CONCERNING THE l p -CONJECTURE FOR DISCRETE SEMIGROUPS F. ABTAHI and M. ZARRIN (Communicated by J. Goldstein) Abstract. For 2 < p
Associativity condition for some alternative algebras of degree three
Associativity condition for some alternative algebras of degree three Mirela Stefanescu and Cristina Flaut Abstract In this paper we find an associativity condition for a class of alternative algebras
An elementary proof of Wigner's theorem on quantum mechanical symmetry transformations
An elementary proof of Wigner's theorem on quantum mechanical symmetry transformations University of Szeged, Bolyai Institute and MTA-DE "Lendület" Functional Analysis Research Group, University of Debrecen
Section 6.1 - Inner Products and Norms
Section 6.1 - Inner Products and Norms Definition. Let V be a vector space over F {R, C}. An inner product on V is a function that assigns, to every ordered pair of vectors x and y in V, a scalar in F,
CURVES WHOSE SECANT DEGREE IS ONE IN POSITIVE CHARACTERISTIC. 1. Introduction
Acta Math. Univ. Comenianae Vol. LXXXI, 1 (2012), pp. 71 77 71 CURVES WHOSE SECANT DEGREE IS ONE IN POSITIVE CHARACTERISTIC E. BALLICO Abstract. Here we study (in positive characteristic) integral curves
On the representability of the bi-uniform matroid
On the representability of the bi-uniform matroid Simeon Ball, Carles Padró, Zsuzsa Weiner and Chaoping Xing August 3, 2012 Abstract Every bi-uniform matroid is representable over all sufficiently large
Math 241, Exam 1 Information.
Math 241, Exam 1 Information. 9/24/12, LC 310, 11:15-12:05. Exam 1 will be based on: Sections 12.1-12.5, 14.1-14.3. The corresponding assigned homework problems (see http://www.math.sc.edu/ boylan/sccourses/241fa12/241.html)
DEGREES OF ORDERS ON TORSION-FREE ABELIAN GROUPS
DEGREES OF ORDERS ON TORSION-FREE ABELIAN GROUPS ASHER M. KACH, KAREN LANGE, AND REED SOLOMON Abstract. We construct two computable presentations of computable torsion-free abelian groups, one of isomorphism
University of Maryland Fraternity & Sorority Life Spring 2015 Academic Report
University of Maryland Fraternity & Sorority Life Academic Report Academic and Population Statistics Population: # of Students: # of New Members: Avg. Size: Avg. GPA: % of the Undergraduate Population
Finite Dimensional Hilbert Spaces and Linear Inverse Problems
Finite Dimensional Hilbert Spaces and Linear Inverse Problems ECE 174 Lecture Supplement Spring 2009 Ken Kreutz-Delgado Electrical and Computer Engineering Jacobs School of Engineering University of California,
Research Article Stability Analysis for Higher-Order Adjacent Derivative in Parametrized Vector Optimization
Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Inequalities and Applications Volume 2010, Article ID 510838, 15 pages doi:10.1155/2010/510838 Research Article Stability Analysis for Higher-Order Adjacent Derivative
The analysis of Toeplitz operators, commutative Toeplitz algebras and applications to heat kernel constructions
The analysis of Toeplitz operators, commutative Toeplitz algebras and applications to heat kernel constructions Dissertation zur Erlangung des mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorgrades Doctor rerum
8.1 Examples, definitions, and basic properties
8 De Rham cohomology Last updated: May 21, 211. 8.1 Examples, definitions, and basic properties A k-form ω Ω k (M) is closed if dω =. It is exact if there is a (k 1)-form σ Ω k 1 (M) such that dσ = ω.
Mathematical Physics, Lecture 9
Mathematical Physics, Lecture 9 Hoshang Heydari Fysikum April 25, 2012 Hoshang Heydari (Fysikum) Mathematical Physics, Lecture 9 April 25, 2012 1 / 42 Table of contents 1 Differentiable manifolds 2 Differential
Dot product and vector projections (Sect. 12.3) There are two main ways to introduce the dot product
Dot product and vector projections (Sect. 12.3) Two definitions for the dot product. Geometric definition of dot product. Orthogonal vectors. Dot product and orthogonal projections. Properties of the dot
Factoring Cubic Polynomials
Factoring Cubic Polynomials Robert G. Underwood 1. Introduction There are at least two ways in which using the famous Cardano formulas (1545) to factor cubic polynomials present more difficulties than
Orthogonal Projections and Orthonormal Bases
CS 3, HANDOUT -A, 3 November 04 (adjusted on 7 November 04) Orthogonal Projections and Orthonormal Bases (continuation of Handout 07 of 6 September 04) Definition (Orthogonality, length, unit vectors).
A survey on multivalued integration 1
Atti Sem. Mat. Fis. Univ. Modena Vol. L (2002) 53-63 A survey on multivalued integration 1 Anna Rita SAMBUCINI Dipartimento di Matematica e Informatica 1, Via Vanvitelli - 06123 Perugia (ITALY) Abstract
1 Variational calculation of a 1D bound state
TEORETISK FYSIK, KTH TENTAMEN I KVANTMEKANIK FÖRDJUPNINGSKURS EXAMINATION IN ADVANCED QUANTUM MECHAN- ICS Kvantmekanik fördjupningskurs SI38 för F4 Thursday December, 7, 8. 13. Write on each page: Name,
ISU Department of Mathematics. Graduate Examination Policies and Procedures
ISU Department of Mathematics Graduate Examination Policies and Procedures There are four primary criteria to be used in evaluating competence on written or oral exams. 1. Knowledge Has the student demonstrated
IRREDUCIBLE OPERATOR SEMIGROUPS SUCH THAT AB AND BA ARE PROPORTIONAL. 1. Introduction
IRREDUCIBLE OPERATOR SEMIGROUPS SUCH THAT AB AND BA ARE PROPORTIONAL R. DRNOVŠEK, T. KOŠIR Dedicated to Prof. Heydar Radjavi on the occasion of his seventieth birthday. Abstract. Let S be an irreducible
Functional Analysis II Final Test, 4.02.2012 Funktionalanalysis II Endklausur, 4.02.2012
Winter Term 2011-2012 Functional Analysis II Final Test, 4.02.2012 Funktionalanalysis II Endklausur, 4.02.2012 Name:/Name: Matriculation number:/matrikelnr.: Semester:/Fachsemester: Degree course:/studiengang:
THE DIMENSION OF A CLOSED SUBSET OF R n AND RELATED FUNCTION SPACES
THE DIMENSION OF A CLOSED SUBSET OF R n AND RELATED FUNCTION SPACES HANS TRIEBEL and HEIKE WINKELVOSS (Jena) Dedicated to Professor Károly Tandori on his seventieth birthday 1 Introduction Let F be a closed
