Land disposal consultation report V 1.1 CONSULTATION REPORT. relating to

Transcription

1 CONSULTATION REPORT relating to PROPOSED LAND DISPOSAL This report is provided as a supplement to our forms for the proposed disposal of land at: Site location and description: Guildford Station, Surrey: The land on the east side currently part of the Station Lease area. It is primarily used as station car parking for passenger and staff and part of the land is on a long lease (999 years) to the owners of Ranger House (adjacent office building currently owned by Surrey County Council). The car parking will be consolidated into a multi storey car park. Station functions will be consolidated into an efficient layout primarily located in a new station building with car and cycle parking in the multi storey car park. Improved forecourt and public realim in front of the station. Network Rail and developer Solum Regeneration are working with the Wessex Route Alliance, Guilford Borough Council and other stakeholders to finalise site layout and arrangements. The reorganisation of the east side of the station frees up space for commercial and residential development which pays for delivery of the new station facilities. Proposal: Long leasehold disposal of the land shown outlined on the attached plans No 1 and 2. It is expected a 250 year lease (s) will be granted to Solum Regeneration. We have consulted in relation to this evaluation, and summarise the results of this as follows: 1.

2 Summary of position regarding responses: 27 Stakeholders were consulted. There were no objections. Responses were not received from Grand Central Rail, Northern Rail, COLAS Freight, GB Railfreight or Railfreight Group. South West Trains confirmed it supports the principle or the development and has given conditional approval (on Station Change and commercial arrangements). SWT confirmed it supports the principle or the development and has given conditional approval (on Station Change and commercial arrangements). Surrey County Council has expressed concerns over the forecourt operation. To address this: Network Rail with the developer, Solum, continues to work with SCC (and SWT) to refine the forecourt layout so that it is better for station operations and meets the future aspirations of the highway authority. This will be formalised in the Planning Process as part of an addendum to the Planning Application and in the Station Change. British Transport Police: Requested further follow-up meetings as the layout is progressed. Network Rail and Solum will be meeting BTP again shortly in the preparation for submitting Station Change and the addendum to the Planning Application. The full list of external consultees is set out below: 2.

3 No. External party (name) Contact name, address and telephone Whether response received (y/n) Date of response Details of response (e.g. no comment ), with reference to any accompanying copy representation in annexes to this report Comments (e.g. as regards endeavours to obtain response where none given) 1 Department for Transport 2 South West Trains (SFO) Y 04/02/2015 DfT has no comment nor objection to the above proposed land disposal Y 02/06/2015 [SWT] offer our conditional approval to the land disposal proposed. We support the principle of the Solum Development and will continue to work with the development team to ensure our operational railways concerns are duly considered Network Rail will work with SWT to complete Station Change before starting work. 3. Our conditional approval is given on the assumption that the land will not be formally disposed of until

4 South Western Trains Ltd has received and given its specific approval to the appropriate Station Change documentation which should include any relevant commercial arrangements. 3 Chiltern Railways Y 05/02/2015 No comments 4 Euro Star Y 01/05/2015 No Comments 5 First Great Western Group Y 27/04/2015 Support the proposals subject to Station Change 6 Grand Central Rail N No reply to original or follow-up s Follow up request sent 10/04/ C2c Rail Y 10/04/2015 National Express Group have no objection to the proposed land disposal 8 NXET Train Ltd Y 10/04/2015 NXET Trains Ltd have no objection to the proposed land disposal 9 Freight Transport Association Y 10/04/015 Freight Transport Association have no comment to the proposed land 4.

5 disposal 10 Surrey County Council 11 Merseyrail Electrics 2002 Limited Y 13/04/2015 our main concerns at this stage is that the Station Forecourt is able to properly serve as a public transport interchange in the future. Detailed comments provided below. Y 03/02/2015 Merseyrail have no comments and objections to the proposal Note the comments raised are being addressed 12 Southern Railway Y 23/03/2015 Southern Railway have no comment to the proposed land disposal 13 Northern Railway N No reply to original or follow-up s Follow up request sent 10/04/2015 Follow up request sent 10/04/2015 Phoned No Answer 30/04/ Aviva Trains Cross Country 15 Direct Rail Services Limited Y 01/06/2015 XC Trains has no objection to the proposal, subject to the agreement of any associated Station Change proposals Y 24/03/2015 No Objection 5.

6 16 DB Schenker Y 30/04/2015 DB Schenker has Follow up request (Formerly EWS) no comment to the sent 10/04/2015 above proposed land disposal Date Answered Phone 30/04/2015. Call 30/04/ Colas Freight N No reply to original or follow-up s Follow up request sent 10/04/2015 Phoned No Answer 30/04/ Freightliner Limited Y 10/04/2015 Freightliner has no comment to the above proposed land disposal 19 GB Railfreight Limited N No reply to original or followup Follow up request sent 10/04/2015 Phoned No Answer 30/04/ Rail Freight Group N No reply to original or follow-up Follow up request sent 10/04/ West Coast Railway Company Copy of response requested from xxxx Y 03/06/2015 West Coast Railway Company has no comment or objection to the above proposed land disposal. xxxx verbally confirmed he had read the consultation documents and confirmed to xxxx Phoned No Answer 30/04/2015 xxxx (NR) telephoned xxxx on 3 rd June 2015 at 12.10pm and xxxx verbally confirmed he had read the consultation documents and confirmed to xxxx(nr) that she could quote that West Coast RC has 6.

7 that I could quote this no objections. Follow up request sent 10/04/2015. Follow-up 20 th March 2014, Original February British Transport Police 23 Association of Community Rail Partnerships 24 London Travel Watch Y 23/03/2015 xxxx responded - No key issues which require addressing Y 19/02/2015 ACoRP have no comment or objection to this disposal Y 08/04/2015 London Travel Watch has no objection to the aforementioned proposal but would like to ensure steps are taken to mitigate any impact Follow up meetings will be arranged with xxxx as the scheme is designed in detail. Follow up request sent 10/04/2015 Spoke to xxxx on 30/04/2015 xxxx is on leave until 8 th May. xxxx was sent an on 30/04/2015 for a quick response. 7.

8 the works may have on passengers at London Road and Guildford Station. 25 Passenger Focus Y 03/03/ Guildford Borough Council Considering only the land disposal, Passenger Focus has no objection Y 01/06/2015 Thank you for the notification in respect of the above. The Local Planning Authority is currently considering a planning application for this site and as such it would not be appropriate to comment on the disposal of this land. Any development proposed for this land will be subject to planning permission will be considered on its merits. 27 WH Malcolm Y 09/02/2015 no objections The developer is working with local stakeholders and the planning authority on potential changes to the scheme (eg to heights of buildings and details of forecourt layout) and in due course will have to apply with any conditions of a planning consent. A copy of the consultation request (before customisation for any individuals) is given in Annex 1 Copies of responses are given in the Annexes 2 to this report, as indicated above. 8.

9 Annexe 1 Network Rail s Consultation Sent: 03 February :53 To: Cc: Subject: Guildford - Land Disposal Process - Formal consultation on proposal to for development of the east side of the station - the carpark, forecourt and east side station buildings Dear Consultee, Property: Guildford Station East Side buildings, forecourt and car park We seek to consult you as regards your views, on the proposed disposal by way of grant of a long lease(s) and re-development of the east side station buildings and forecourt. We attach a draft application form to the Office of Rail Regulation which, with its related plan, explains the proposal in detail. Subject to the outcome of the consultation, we will make a formal application to ORR for consent to make the disposal under the terms of our network licence land disposal condition. We would expect to make an application based on this form, updated in the light of consultation responses. We request your comments, please, by close on Tuesday 3 rd March 2015 (including any no comment or no objection response). It would be helpful if your response is provided by . If you have any queries as regards this proposal, please direct them to xxxx, Tel. 0207, If future consultations of this nature should be directed differently to your organisation, please advise us of the appropriate contact details, so we may amend our records. Yours faithfully, Property Floor 5 1 Eversholt Street, London, NW1 2DN T +44 (020) M +44 (0) 9.

10 Annexe 2: Consultation Response s: 1 Department for Transport From: [@railexecutive.gsi.gov.uk] Sent: 04 February :17 To: Subject: Guildford - Land Disposal Process - Formal consultation on proposal to for of the east side of the station - the carpark, forecourt and east side station buildings Hi Please accept this to confirm that DfT have no comment nor objection to the proposed land disposal detailed above. Thanks and regards Rail Executive Department for Transport 3 rd Floor - Great Minster House 33 Horseferry Road London SW1P 4DR 2 South West Trains (SFO) Sent: 03 June :45 To: (SWT) Subject: FW: Guildford - Land Disposal Process - Formal consultation on proposal to for development of the east side of the station - the carpark, forecourt and east side station buildings Dear For clarification to my below: I confirm that Network Rail / Solum will not commence the development works until Station Change has been granted. 10.

11 Regards Sent: 03 June :30 To: Cc: Subject: RE: Guildford - Land Disposal Process - Formal consultation on proposal to for development of the east side of the station - the carpark, forecourt and east side station buildings Dear Many thanks for your LC7 consultation response below. I look forward to working through to a successful Station Change with the SWT and Wessex Alliance teams. Regards Property Network Rail 1 Eversholt Street London NW1 2DN Ph 020 Mob From: (SWT) Sent: 02 June :33 Cc: Subject: Fw: Guildford - Land Disposal Process - Formal consultation on proposal to for development of the east side of the station - the carpark, forecourt and east side station buildings 11.

12 Dear Guildford - Land Disposal Process Further to our conversation I confirm that we are able to offer our conditional approval to the land disposal proposed. We support the principle of the Solum Development and will continue to work with the development team to ensure our operational railways concerns are duly considered. Our conditional approval is given on the assumption that the land will not be formally disposed of until South Western Trains Ltd has received and given its specific approval to the appropriate Station Change documentation which should include any relevant commercial arrangements. Please contact either myself or xxxx directly if you require any further clarification m: Note from xxxx, Network Rail: The response above followed many s, phone calls and meetings. Copies of the key communications may be provided on request. 3 Chiltern Railways From: EXTL: Sent: 05 February :12 Subject: RE: Guildford - Land Disposal Process - Formal consultation on proposal to for development of the east side of the station - the carpark, forecourt and east side station buildings Hello There are no comments from Chiltern Railways. All the best, 4 Eurostar International Ltd. No issue for EIL, Thanks 12.

13 5 First Great Western Group Sent: 27 April :00 Cc: Subject: Re: Guildford - Land Disposal Process - Formal consultation on proposal to for development of the east side of the station - the carpark, forecourt and east side station buildings Thanks for sight of the plans. First Greater Western Limited remain supporting of the proposals, however, our support is based on the overall scheme, and as such approval so far doesn't automatically suggest signing up to the associated Station Change and any impact to Long Term Charge and/or Qualifying Expenditure without sight of the Change Proposal first. Many thanks, First Great Western Procurement I Floor 4 I Milford House I 1 Milford Street I Swindon I SN1 1HL I m: First Greater Western Limited I Registered in England and Wales number Registered office: Milford House, 1 Milford Street, Swindon SN1 1HL 6 Grand Central Rail No reply 7 & 8 National Express Group On behalf of National Express Group and NXET Trains Ltd, I confirm that we have no objection to the proposed disposal Rgds Sent from my Samsung device 13.

14 Land disposal consultation report V Freight Transport Association FTA has no comment on this one. Freight Transport Association Mobile : 10 Surrey County Council Dear Thank you for this. The County Council remains in discussion with Solum regarding the planning application for the redevelopment of Guildford Station, I attach for your use a copy of our observations to the Planning Application. I would please ask that you digest and take these comments on board. One of our main concerns at this stage is that the Station Forecourt is able to properly serve as a public transport interchange in the future. I have received a response from Solum's Transport Agent which I have not yet read, or attached here. I would happy to forward those to you on this understanding if you feel it would be useful? Regards, Planning & Development Surrey County Council Guildford Station Development Proposals SCC Highway Authority Transport Observations Team/Services Commentary Local Highways Team Transport Development Planning Commentary Action Required 14.

15 The junction of Walnut Tree Close and Bridge Street should be improved Proposal identified by Developer Applicant to check and respond to RSA Audit. The parking spaces at the narrow section of Walnut Tree Close should be reviewed as there is a problem with traffic gridlock during peak times. The two suggested mitigating schemes for the gyratory, the widening of the exit from Walnut Tree Close and of the right turn from Bridge St (towards the south) will have very limited effect on capacity, whilst increasing risks to pedestrians, and increasing the likelihood of lane-changing collisions. Contrary to the MB document, there is indeed an accident problem in Walnut Tree Close, if not of the scale of the gyratory itself. The Station Square General arrangement appears to show two zebra (?) crossings either side of the vehicle entry/ exit. Given the existing pelican, the volume and nature of pedestrian traffic, the existing accident problem would be better mitigated by raised two pedex crossings Not relevant to scheme Application includes modelling of gyratory Walnut Tree Close Junction See 1 above. No loss of, or impact on pedestrian provision. Bridge Street/Onslow Street RSA Stage 1 Requested. Raised table across forecourt to be sought. Use of two controlled crossing to be considered. None. TDP to present a summary of the impact with the formal response. Applicant to check and respond to RSA. Applicant to check and respond to RSA. Applicant to confirm proposed works as part of the development. Road Safety It is difficult to make comment on the Station redevelopment proposal in isolation. There is a proposal to close Walnut Tree Close which would clearly affect traffic conditions. Similarly development, LEP and major scheme monies are earmarked for various locations in the vicinity of the station these include schemes for the gyratory itself, Woodbridge Road and Middleton Rd. The appropriate mitigation measures for the station redevelopment will depend on the progress of other schemes the traffic effects are interdependent. (Also, steps are shown on the west of square, the facilities for the mobility impaired are not clear). Noted. Discussions continuing with xxxx (SCC Transport Policy). Mitigation sought to include forecourt raised table, waymarking signage, contribution towards Walnut Bridge replacement and Travel Planning initiatives. Concerns to be raised with applicant. Applicant to confirm proposed works as part of the development/scc to negotiate with applicant. Applicant to confirm/clarify 15.

16 11 Merseyrail Electrics 2002 Limited From: Sent: 20 March :54 Subject: RE: Guildford - Land Disposal Process - Formal consultation on proposal to for development of the east side of the station - the carpark, forecourt and east side station buildings (re-sent with reduced size - apologies if you receive this twice) I can confirm that Merseyrail have no comments and objections to the proposal. Regards Merseyrail Tel Mob 12 Southern Railway Morning We have no comments to make in respect of the above. Apologies for the delay in responding. Regards. FACILITIES 13 Northern Railway No response to initial or follow-up requests. 16.

17 14 Aviva Trains Cross Country From: Sent: 01 June :08 Cc: Subject: FW: Guildford - Land Disposal Process - Formal consultation on proposal to for development of the east side of the station - the carpark, forecourt and east side station buildings - final request Hi Apologies if you havent received a response from me on this. I can confirm that XC Trains has no objection to the proposal, subject to the agreement of any associated Station Change proposals. Kind regards CrossCountry Phone: 0121 Mobile: Address: 5th Floor, Cannon House, 18 The Priory Queensway, Birmingham, B4 6BS 15 Direct Rail Services Limited From: [mailto:@drsl.co.uk] Sent: 24 March :27 Subject: RE: Guildford - Land Disposal Process - Formal consultation on proposal to for development of the east side of the station - the carpark, forecourt and east side station buildings (re-sent with reduced size - apologies if you receive this twice) Direct Rail Services have no objections to the proposed land disposal at Guildford. Regards Tel: Mobile: 17.

18 Land disposal consultation report V 1.1 Direct Rail Services Limited Kingmoor TMD Etterby Road Carlisle CA3 9NZ 16 DB Schenker (Formerly EWS) I can confirm that DB Schenker has no objection to the proposed land disposal as described. Yours, 17 Colas Freight No Reply 18 Freightliner Limited From: [mailto:@freightliner.co.uk] Sent: 03 February :46 Subject: Re: Guildford - Land Disposal Process - Formal consultation on proposal to for development of the east side of the station - the carpark, forecourt and east side station buildings (re-sent with reduced size - apologies if you receive this twice) No comments from Freightliner. Regards 19 GB Railfreight Limited No Reply 18.

19 20 Rail Freight Group No Reply 21 West Coast Railway Company xxxx (NR) telephoned xxxx on 3rd June 2015 at 12.10pm and xxxx verbally confirmed he had read the consultation documents and confirmed that she could quote that West Coast RC has no objections. 22 British Transport Police Sent: 20 May :08 To: Subject: RE: Guildford - Land Disposal Process - Formal consultation on proposal to for development of the east side of the station - the carpark, forecourt and east side station buildings (re-sent with reduced size - apologies if you receive this twice) Hello Thank you for your below. Apologies for being off the radar for a while. The planning application was submitted and now Solum are amending the scheme following public and council consultation. We would like to meet you together with the SWT team responsible for security.. I will be in touch in the near future so we can update you and take your further advice. Best regards From: [mailto:@btp.pnn.police.uk] Sent: 23 March :28 Cc: Subject: FW: Guildford - Land Disposal Process - Formal consultation on proposal to for development of the east side of the station - the carpark, forecourt and east side station buildings (re-sent with reduced size - apologies if you receive this twice) 19.

20 Hi I am part of the consultation team for the Guildford Project and attended a scheme briefing and Secured by Design review workshop in Aug 2014 where the following was agreed; All agreed the workshop had been very useful and there were no key issues that required addressing before application would be submitted. Post planning approval (anticipated Jan 15) a series of meetings would be arranged to develop the design in line with best practice. Should contact be required in the meantime they should contact the PM No subsequent meeting has taken place this year to date, so the above statement stands subject to the condition that safety and security of the railway is paramount and never compromised. Kind Regards. B Division South - Sub Sector South Tel: Blackberry Mobile - Sent: 21 May :54 Subject: RE: Guildford LC7 consultation Hi Have you received the Guildford LC7 consultation? I spoke to xxxx about it but don t seem to have had a reply. I am finalising the consultation report and would be delighted to hear from you on it. Do let me know if you would like to discuss it. Many thanks 20.

21 23 Association of Community Rail Partnerships From Sent: 19 February :03 Subject: RE: Guildford - Land Disposal Process - Formal consultation on proposal to for development of the east side of the station - the carpark, forecourt and east side station buildings (re-sent with reduced size - apologies if you receive this twice) Hello ACoRP have no objection to this disposal. Regards ACoRP 24 London Travel Watch Dear London TravelWatch s remit ends at London Road station. However, we are responding to this consultation, due to it s proximity to Guildford station and the potential knock-on effects of the planned works. We have no objections to the aforementioned proposal, but would like to ensure steps are taken to mitigate any impact the works may have on passengers at London Road and Guildford station. Regards 21.

22 25 Passenger Focus Thank you for sending Passenger Focus details of the proposal to dispose of property In Guildford, and for the replies sent in reply to issues raised. They note it is part of a large redevelopment of the east side of the station, and that: the land along the east side of the railway station comprises the main station building, other railway buildings, station car parking, other parking leased to Surrey CC, and access to other land; the disposal is proposed to be by 250 year lease(s) to Solum Regeneration; the intention is to redevelop the land as a mixed use scheme which will provide: a new station building with larger public areas, a multi-storey car park, new public spaces and improved forecourt, commercial retail and residential development; planning approval is currently expected sometime in the summer of 2015; Network Rail will retain freehold ownership of operational land, and necessary access. Passenger Focus also notes that: access to the existing booking hall will be maintained until the new one is ready for use; the station change process will be used for the temporary arrangements required during the development; a station change and minor modification will be issued for the alteration to the station lease that the redevelopment will require. xxxx has met with you regarding specific aspects of what the scheme will mean for passengers at the station; Passenger Focus looks forward to representing passengers as the development progresses. xxxx, SWT s stakeholder manager, has been in touch regarding dispensation for various features of the car parking. Considering only the land disposal, Passenger Focus has no objection. Regards, Tel. Leading a world-class railway that creates opportunity for people and businesses 22.

23 26 Guildford Borough Council From: Sent: 01 June :40 Subject: Land disposal consultation [UNC] Thank you for the notification in respect of the above. The Local Planning Authority is currently considering a planning application for this site and as such it would not be appropriate to comment on the disposal of this land. Any development proposed for this land will be subject to planning permission will be considered on its merits. Regards Planning Services Telephone: Guildford Borough Council Millmead House Guildford Surrey GU2 4BB 27 WH Malcolm From: [mailto:@whm.co.uk] Sent: 09 February :28 Subject: RE: Guildford - Land Disposal Process - Formal consultation on proposal to for development of the east side of the station - the carpark, forecourt and east side station buildings WH Malcolm has no objections to the proposal. Malcolm Group, Tillyflats, Laurieston Road, Grangemouth, UK, FK3 8XT Tel: Fax: Mobile: Web: 23.

24