Policy. Projects. Work. 30 year. 10 year. 5 year

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Policy. Projects. Work. 30 year. 10 year. 5 year"

Transcription

1 Policy N.C. Statewide Long-Range Transporta on Plan (2040 Plan) 30 year Program & Resource Plan 10 year State Transporta on Improvement Program (STIP) Projects Work Program 5 year

2 BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE GOVERNOR STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION EUGENE A. CONTI, JR. SECRETARY Dear Members of of the the North Carolina Board Board of of Transportation: I submit to to you you the the Department of of Transportation s strategic decision-making framework framework for for transportation programs programs and policies and policies in North in North Carolina. Carolina. This has This been has developed been developed by the by department the Department in response in response to Governor to Governor Bev Perdue s Bev Perdue s mandate mandate to reform to reform transportation transportation decision- decision-making and bring more and bring professional more professional management management to state government. to state government. This Policy to to Projects document does does two two things: things: 1. It 1. outlines It outlines the the projects the the Department will undertake for the decade , , with with associated associated funding funding levels. levels. 2. It presents the Department s performance management plan, showing the highest 2. It presents priority programs the Department s and policies performance and the target management measures plan, for meeting showing them. highest priority programs and policies and the target measures for meeting them. The projects, programs and services outlined in this document are those that will enable the Department The projects, to programs meet our goals and services of: outlined in this document are those that will enable the Department Making our to transportation meet our goals network of: safer Making our our transportation network move safer goods and people more efficiently Making our our transportation network infrastructure move last goods longer and people more efficiently Making our transportation infrastructure last longer The projects in this plan were selected based on a Strategic Prioritization process that relied on The extensive projects public in this input plan and were data-based selected using rating a of Strategic projects to Prioritization ensure the highest process value that for relied transportation on extensive public dollar investments. input and data-based rating of projects to ensure the highest value for transportation dollar investments. Some notable spending priorities include (MAINTENANCE AND BRIDGE) Notable spending priorities include more emphasis on preserving and enhancing our The existing Department infrastructure. has implemented The plan calls performance spending management $1.6 billion and business on bridge planning replacement elements and to $930 ensure million that we on are interstate delivering pavement the projects, rehabilitation programs between and services 2015 identified and in this document. We will continue to report our organizational performance to you quarterly. You may also find the The Department s Executive has implemented Metrics, Organizational performance management Performance and Dashboard business and planning Annual Performance elements to ensure Reports that on our we website are delivering at the projects, programs and services identified in this document. We will continue to report our organizational performance to you quarterly. Please You may consider also find adopting the Department s this Policy to Executive Projects document Metrics, Organizational at the July 2011 Performance Board meeting. Dashboard and Annual Performance Reports on our website at Sincerely Please consider adopting this Policy to Projects document at the July 2011 Board meeting. Sincerely Eugene A. Conti, Jr. Eugene A. Conti, Jr.

3 This page intentionally left blank.

4 Table of Contents

5 Table of contents Executive Summary... 4 Overview... 6 Table 1 FY2011 Executive Performance Measures Program & Resource Plan ( ) Table 2 Budget By Program Categories Table 3 Multi-year Resource Strategy Year Work Program ( ) Table 4 Summary Table 5 Construction & Engineering Highway Maintenance Table 6 Maintenance Operations Table 7 Operations Table 8 Administration Table 9 Business Units Transfers from N.C. Department of Transportation Table 10 Transfers Table 11 Investment Mix By Goal Table 12 Investment Mix By Tier Project List State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Legend Statewide Division Division Division Division Division Division Division Division Division Division Division Division Division Division Public Transportation Legend Public Transportation Funded Public Transportation Illustrative Unfunded Aviation Division Managed Construction Appendix July 6, 2011

6

7 Executive Summary

8 Executive Summary This document outlines the Department s recommended strategic plan for the period It includes three major components of the transportation reform framework covering investment outcomes and deliverables that will accomplish the Department s mission and goals: 1. The Program & Resource Plan contains revenue projections and proposed allocation of funds across all modes of transportation for construction and engineering, maintenance, operations and administration from Over this 10- year period, almost $45 billion in transportation funding is anticipated. Nearly 60 percent of this amount is allocated for construction and engineering and over 30 percent for maintenance. The remainder will be split between operations and administration. The Program & Resource Plan also contains a multi-year investment strategy for the Construction & Engineering Program a balancing among the goals of safety, mobility and infrastructure health, spread across the state s different modes of transportation (aviation, bicycle and pedestrian, ferry, highway, public transportation and rail). The strategy also establishes Levels of Service and investment amounts to meet those levels. At these investment levels, a level of service B for interstate pavements, level of service B for highway mobility on the statewide and regional tiers and level of service A for bicycle and pedestrian mobility on the statewide tier is expected. 2. The 5 Year Work Program identifies the Department s proposed spending for During this time period, we expect to spend approximately $24 billion. The 5 Year Work Program comprises the first five years of the Program and Resource Plan, but with a more detailed accounting of how dollars will be allocated at a program level. 3. The Project List includes all projects included in the 5 Year Work Program and the Program & Resource Plan, applying costs and schedules for each project. The Project List was generated by applying the investment strategy described above to a prioritized list of transportation needs identified by our stakeholders. Actual projects selected to meet this strategy were screened to meet funding, legal, and scheduling constraints. A subset of these projects, those shown for constitutes NCDOT s State Transportation Improvement Program. The Project List also includes smaller division-managed construction projects such as secondary road improvements and small bridge replacements. The Department has identified two focus areas for the period covered by the strategic plan, both related to preserving infrastructure. The plan increases funding for bridge replacement and interstate highway rehabilitation to bring those key existing assets to levels of service required to serve the traveling public. Once adopted, any changes to the 5 Year Work Program or the Program & Resource Plan would need to be approved as amendments by the Board of Transportation.

9 This page intentionally left blank.

10 Overview

11 background In January 2009, Governor Bev Perdue issued two Executive Orders requiring change at The North Carolina Department of Transportation. Executive Order # 2 called for reform in decision-making at NCDOT, and Executive Order # 3 called for improvements in performance management and accountability in state government. As the Department sought to create a framework to meet those mandates, Transportation Secretary Gene Conti solicited input from more than 1,500 transportation stakeholders, including Metropolitan and Rural Planning Organizations (MPOs and RPOs), elected officials and industry partners. These groups were asked how NCDOT could improve transportation decision-making. The responses fell into the following categories: Data-driven and transparent decision-making processes Credible project schedules Better coordination within NCDOT Improved planning partnerships Flexible funding Adequate time for public input into transportation needs. In addition, NCDOT researched best practices used by other transportation agencies across the United States. The model used by the Florida Department of Transportation was deemed the most useful, and much of our strategic planning framework is based on that approach. NCDOT s transformation effort is also referred to as Transportation Reform.

12 strategic direction Strategic Direction DOT s day-to-day tactical and long-term strategic activities are guided by the owing core mission NCDOT s and day-to-day goals, adopted tactical by and the long-term Department strategic in 2007: activities are guided by the following core mission and goals, adopted by the Department in 2007: The first three goals, referred to as safety, mobility and infrastructure health, are the fundamental reasons that the Department of Transportation exists. The other two, works well and great place, are supplemental goals that enable us to meet the three primary goals. By working towards these goals, we are able to meet our mission. NCDOT employees day-to-day tasks are diverse and range from reaching out to high school students about seatbelt usage (safety) to providing intercity rail service (mobility), from sealing cracks in pavement (infrastructure health) to reducing wait time at DMV Offices (works well). Strategic Planning Framework e first three goals, referred to as safety, mobility and infrastructure health, are fundamental NCDOT reasons has that reformed the Department transportation of Transportation decision-making exists. and The improved other performance and, works well accountability and great place, for our are core supplemental goals of safety, goals mobility that enable and infrastructure us to health by creating 30, et the three primary 10 and goals. 5-year By transportation working towards plans that these nest goals, together. we are able to et our mission. Policy N.C. Statewide Long-Range Transporta on Plan DOT employees day-to-day tasks (2040 are Plan) diverse and range from reaching out to h school students about seatbelt 30 usage year (safety) to providing intercity rail vice (mobility), from sealing cracks in pavement (infrastructure health) to ucing wait time at DMV Offices Program (works & Resource well). Plan 10 year Statewide Transporta on Improvement Program (STIP) Projects Work Program 5 year

13 North Carolina Transportation Plan (2040 Plan) The North Carolina Transportation Plan is a 30-year document that defines the mission and goals of the Department and sets out key objectives and strategies to achieve them. These elements guide decision-making, including investment decisions. The plan outlines the resources needed to support the Program and Resource Plan and sets forth an investment strategy that embraces all modes. This plan is developed by transportation professionals at NCDOT with input from regional and local bodies, based on significant public input. The plan undergoes a complete revision every eight years, with data updates every four years. The existing Statewide Transportation Plan (also known as the Long Range Transportation Plan) was last updated in In 2010, NCDOT began a major update, called the 2040 Plan, that is expected to be completed in Spring The 2040 Plan is intended to reflect changes that have occurred since 2004 in terms of broad economic and social developments, internal governance and program delivery mechanisms, and changes in the state s goals for mobility and freight logistics. It is being developed with broad input from Metropolitan and Rural Planning Organizations (MPOs, RPOs), local governments and other stakeholders. Program & Resource Plan The Program & Resource Plan is a 10-year plan that addresses both transportation needs and fiscal constraints. The plan is based on a process called Strategic Prioritization, which enables the Department to apply limited transportation resources to the projects that will best help us meet the mission and goals in a data-driven and transparent way. Under Prioritization, professional staff from NCDOT and regional Metropolitan and Rural Planning Organizations prioritize their transportation needs. Those needs are categorized by the three goals of safety, mobility and infrastructure health, and then ranked based on objective criteria such as crash data, congestion levels, pavement and bridge conditions, etc. The result is a list of North Carolina s transportation needs, unconstrained by fiscal or other considerations. The document also identifies 10-year performance targets for the goals of Safety, Mobility, and Infrastructure Health. A technical analysis shows how various investment mixes will yield differing outcomes in meeting our goals. The Program & Resource Plan includes a cash-constrained 10-year budget for the Department. It is based on forecasted expenditures, revenues (state and federal), and cash balances, and includes trend analyses of revenues, commitments, reimbursements, payout rates, etc. A critical step in the Program & Resource Plan is the convergence of the strategic prioritization outputs and the cash constrained budget. To the previously unconstrained needs list, NCDOT applies funding levels and additional constraints such as eligibility, equity, etc. The outcome is a 10-year plan that shows the prioritized projects and

14 programs NCDOT plans to carry out with the projected available funds to achieve defined performance targets. It should be emphasized that the 10-year Program and Resource Plan is a fluid document, based on projections that will change, especially in the latter years. 5 Year Work Program The Work Program derives from the Program and Resource plan. It contains both program and project-level information. The Work Program is an accounting of the state s annual transportation program grouped by five categories: Construction & Engineering Maintenance Operations Administration Transfers The Work Program is NCDOT s commitment to the projects we plan to build and the services we plan to offer over the next five years. Work Program projects can be found in years of the Project List. The 5-year Work Program is produced and reviewed by the Board of Transportation every year. The first two years of the Work Program are aligned with the biennial budget cycle. Project List The state also publishes the State Transportation Improvement Program, which is a seven-year subset of the Project List required under federal and state law. It is published every two years. The project list in this strategic planning document also includes smaller projects, called division-managed construction projects.

15 Performance and Accountability NCDOT has implemented a framework of performance management and business planning elements to enable us to meet our goals. To ensure that NCDOT is achieving the expected outcomes, we have adopted a series of accountability tools that track and report performance results. Executive Performance Measures At the beginning of each fiscal year, NCDOT establishes measurable performance targets that gauge the overall success of the Department as an organization. Each performance measure is assigned an annual target for desired achievement that is linked to at least one of the five organization goals. The annual targets are set independently based on performance trends, previous year results, resources available, national standards and recommendations and legislative requirements. Performance targets are set to be challenging, yet realistic and achievable. These measures are the basis for driving towards a better transportation network and an improved level of service to the State of North Carolina. The results of these executive measures are monitored by management on an ongoing basis and reported quarterly in a performance report referred to as the scorecard. Some of these measures are currently automated and reported more frequently on the Performance Dashboard located at www. ncdot.gov/performance. Performance measures for Fiscal Year 2011 are shown in Table 1. 10

16 Table 1 FY2011 Executive Performance Measures For more information about these metrics see the Appendix or visit NCDOT OUR METRICS STATE FISCAL YEAR 2011 GOAL # EXECUTIVE PERFORMANCE MEASURE SFY11 Target Make our 1.1 Statewide network crash rate 235 or less transportation 1.2 Statewide network fatality rate 1.66 or less network safer 1.3 Percentage of surveyed North Carolina drivers using a safety belt** 90% or greater GOAL # EXECUTIVE PERFORMANCE MEASURE SFY11 Target 2.1 Average statewide accident duration time (in minutes) 75 min. or less Make our 2.2 Travel time index of surveyed interstates 1.35 or less transportation 2.3 Percentage of planned ferry runs completed as scheduled 95% or greater network move people 2.4 Rail service customer satisfaction index 87% or greater and goods more efficiently Percentage reduction in expected growth of commuter generated vehicle miles % or greater traveled since year 2000* GOAL # EXECUTIVE PERFORMANCE MEASURE SFY11 Target 3.1 Percentage of bridges rated in good condition 76% or greater 1 Make our 3.2 Percentage of pavement miles rated in good condition** 80% or greater 2 infrastructure last Weighted score of all other highway features rated in acceptable condition 3.3 longer (excludes bridges and pavement)** 84 or greater 3.4 Rest area condition scores 90 or greater GOAL # EXECUTIVE PERFORMANCE MEASURE SFY11 Target 4.1 Percentage of work program projects "advertised for bid" and awarded on schedule 85% or greater 4.2 Percentage of construction projects completed on schedule and on budget 85% or greater 4.3 Average customer wait time at DMV facilities that track transactions 15 min. or less Make our Average statewide environmental compliance score on construction and 4.4 organization a place maintenance projects 7.5 or greater that works well 4.5 Percentage of department planned expenses compared to actual receipts +/- 5 to 10% 4.6 Percentage of federal receipts eligible for billing authority* 95% or greater 4.7 Percentage of overall budget for administrative costs 7.6% or less 4.8 Percentage of the total program budget paid to minority- and women-owned businesses 10% or greater GOAL # EXECUTIVE PERFORMANCE MEASURE SFY11 Target 5.1 Percentage of high performing employees retained after one year 80% or greater Make our 5.2 Average number of days to hire new employees 60 or less organization a great 5.3 Employee engagement survey score** 5.0 or greater place to work 5.4 Employee safety index 6.16 or less * Performance measure is based on federal fiscal year (October 1 - September 30) ** Performance measure is based on a standing survey or assessment 1 Performance target is an aspirational goal and the annual goal is to achieve 65% or greater 2 Performance target is an aspirational goal and the annual goal is to achieve 70% or greater 11

17 Performance Dashboard The NCDOT performance dashboard displays performance indi goal areas of Safety, Mobility, Infrastructure Health, Works Wel to Work. Additional detailed data, or drill down menus, are ava to view data at increasingly granular levels, both geographically The dashboard is automated and provides results as frequent a available. The dashboard can be found at Performance Dashboard The NCDOT performance dashboard displays performance indicators for our five goal areas of safety, mobility, infrastructure health, works well and great place to work. Additional detailed data, or drill down menus, are available for the user to view data at increasingly granular levels, both geographically and functionally. The dashboard is automated and provides results as frequent as currently available. The dashboard can be found at r s the t d Performance Reports Performance Each year NCDOT Reports produces an Annual Each Performance year NCDOT Report produces that gives an the Annual results of our Performance executive performance Report that measures gives the and results highlights of our executive the Department s performance key accomplishments measures and highlights during the the Department s previous year. key The accomplishments report provides detail during about the previous each measure year. The and how report it is provides calculated, detail shows about each trend measure information and and how gives it is calculated, results by functions shows trend (motor information vehicles and transportation gives results by modes) functions and (motor geographical vehicles regions and transportation of the state. The modes) report and geographical is presented regions to the NC of General the state. Assembly, The report as is presented required in to Session the NC Law General , Assembly, and as is posted required on the Department s in Session Law web and site at is posted on gov/performance/reports/. the Department s web site at 12

18 This page intentionally left blank. 13

19 Program & Resource Plan ( )

20 Program & Resource Plan The Program & Resource Plan uses proven financial management practices to address growing transportation needs. The 10-year plan uses a data-driven process to select projects and determine the most strategic use of limited financial resources. Table 2 shows the projected 10-year budget for the Department. NCDOT operates on a cashflow basis, which means that the Department may award contracts against future revenues. The advantage of a cash-flow method is that transportation tax collections are returned to the taxpayer in the form of transportation improvements much sooner than on a pay-as-you-go basis. The plan starts with a base-year budget and forecasts future year revenues (state and federal) and expenditures by analyzing trends, economic variables, contractual payout rates and future-year commitments. The Program & Resource Plan is categorized into these programs: Construction & Engineering preliminary engineering, construction, right of way, environmental mitigation and other elements of capital projects Maintenance activities and projects to maintain our multi-modal transportation network Operations activities and projects to operate our multi-modal transportation network Administration management and support services Transfers dollars that are transferred from NCDOT funds to other state agencies, the General Fund and NC Global TransPark Table 3 is a key document of this Program and Resource Plan. In 2009, NCDOT asked Metropolitan and Rural Planning Organizations (MPOs and RPOs) and NCDOT staff to identify their transportation needs. They came back with more than $54 billion in capital needs. Over the period, NCDOT s projected budget for these programs is approximately $10.5 billion. Columns on the chart show: 1) Funding needs as submitted by local communities, 2) Funding at current levels, 3) Funding recommendations from stakeholder summits, 4) Final allocations. To strategically invest these scarce resources statewide, NCDOT applied the investment strategy shown in Table 3 to the list of prioritized projects 1. Table 3 lays out the multi-year investment strategy for the Construction & Engineering program 2. The strategy reflects a balance of investment across the goals (safety, mobility and infrastructure health), the modes of transportation (aviation, bicycle and pedestrian, ferry, highway, public transportation and rail), and the tiers 3 (statewide, regional and subregional). Funding of projects 1 More information on the prioritization process, including a list of projects that were prioritized but not yet funded, can be found on our website at 2 The investment strategy was applied to a majority of the Construction & Engineering program funds. Preliminary Engineering, Right of Way, Congestion Management Air Quality, Non-Bicycle/Pedestrian Enhancement, and Direct Attributable funds were not included. Contract Resurfacing funds (found in Maintenance) were also included. 3 For more information on the North Carolina Multimodal Investment Network tier system, please visit gov/performance/reform/ncminmaps/. 14

21 was allocated to meet Federal and State funding eligibility requirements, the equity formula 4, air quality conformity requirements and scheduling capabilities. The Project List is based on this investment strategy. Table 3 also shows the results, or Levels of Service, that can be expected for these levels of investment. Levels of Service (LOS) connect transportation system needs and projects to future desired system performance. LOS ratings are similar to a school report card, with LOS A indicating highest performance achievable and F indicating low performance. 4 The equity formula was created in 1989 by the General Assembly. It requires that State Transportation Improvement Program funds be distributed equitably among regions of the state. Distribution is based 50 percent on the population of a region, 25 percent on the number of miles of intrastate highways left to complete in a region and the remaining 25 percent is distributed equally among the regions for the STIP. Urban loop, congestion mitigation and air quality funds, and competitive/discretionary federal grants are exempt from the formula. 15

22 Table 2 budget by program categories program & resource plan ($ in Millions) Construction & Engineering TOTAL $ % $ % $ % $ % $ % $ % $ % $ % $ % $ % $ % $2,520 62% $2,577 60% $2,908 61% $3,027 61% $2,871 59% $2,752 58% $2,310 54% $2,131 52% $2,291 53% $2,308 53% $25,694 57% Maintenance $1,132 28% $1,253 29% $1,349 28% $1,411 28% $1,422 29% $1,430 30% $1,437 33% $1,442 35% $1,448 34% $1,456 34% $13,779 31% Operations $178 4% $213 5% $224 5% $223 4% $267 5% $278 6% $259 6% $225 5% $231 5% $233 5% $2,330 5% Administration $260 6% $287 7% $294 6% $297 6% $301 6% $305 6% $309 7% $312 8% $316 7% $320 7% $3,001 7% Total Program $4,090 $4,330 $4,774 $4,958 $4,861 $4,765 $4,315 $4,110 $4,287 $4,317 $44,804 Transfers $375 $339 $330 $307 $310 $313 $318 $321 $329 $333 $3, Total Budget $4,465 $4,669 $5,103 $5,264 $5,171 $5,078 $4,632 $4,431 $4,615 $4,650 $48,081

23 This page intentionally left blank. 17

24 Table 3 Multi-year resource strategy program & resource plan MODE GOAL TIER SUBMODE 2010 ESTIMATED LOS 5 SUBMITTED NEEDS $ STAY THE COURSE % of Total GREENSBORO SUMMIT RECOMMENDED STRATEGY LOS 5 $ % of Total Est. LOS 6 $ KINSTON SUMMIT RECOMMENDED STRATEGY % of Total Est. LOS 6 $ MORGANTON SUMMIT RECOMMENDED STRATEGY % of Total Est. LOS 6 $ NCDOT SUMMIT RECOMMENDED STRATEGY % of Total Est. LOS 5 $ FINAL STIP ALLOCATIONS 10 % of Total Est. LOS 5 Safety Regional C $10,342,500 $19,200, % D $31,136, % D $17,920, % D $18,133, % D $21,720, % D $147,636, % A Subregional C $1,525,000 $1,200, % D $3,336, % D $1,120, % D $900, % F $3,680, % D $71,602, % A Aviation 1 Regional C $3,178,931 $39,000, % F $50,980, % F $62,900, % F $36,000, % F $10,520, % F $5,500, % F Mobility Subregional C $7,331,163 $600, % F $18,240, % F $600, % F $600, % F $7,930, % F 0.0% F Health Regional C $1,295,550 $18,600, % D $17,888, % D $17,360, % D $18,600, % D $4,825, % F $3,720, % F Subregional C $270,000 $2,400, % D $7,480, % D $1,760, % F $2,266, % D $709, % F $2,280, % D Bicycle & Pedestrian Ferry Statewide D $11,718,243 $45, % F $178, % D $279, % C $171, % D $656, % A $22,360, % A Mobility Regional F $25,053,361 $3,000, % F $34,620, % F $69,491, % D $16,666, % F $8,100, % F $726, % F Subregional F $334,286,940 $22,470, % F $89,020, % D $110,024, % D $115,856, % D $63,000, % D $26,311, % F Statewide C $156,000,000 $102,000, % D $99,600, % D $112,440, % C $102,000, % D $163,800, % C $71,600, % D Mobility Regional C $0 $60,000, % D $63,000, % D $49,200, % D $55,333, % D $525, % D 0.0% D Statewide B $13,950,000 $11,374, % D $14,356, % D $11,287, % D $11,040, % D $16,800, % C $1,150, % F Health Regional B $1,500,000 $6,680, % B $4,808, % C $6,061, % B $6,435, % B $1,575, % C 0.0% C Statewide C $64,170,000 $126,231, % C $103,046, % D $138,656, % C $126,281, % C $76,825, % D 0.0% D Mobility Regional C $2,314,375,200 $374,184, % C $340,910, % C $359,510, % C $430,071, % C $608,000, % C $234,237, % D Public Transportation 8 Health Subregional C $287,528,500 $192,784, % C $197,685, % C $198,880, % C $192,784, % C $161,000, % C $1,439, % D Statewide C $0 $36,000, % C $32,880, % C $33,600, % C $36,000, % C $6,425, % D 0.0% D Regional C $95,042,200 $160,874, % B $117,536, % C $128,121, % C $151,936, % B $107,750, % C $6,106, % D Subregional B $139,761,059 $368,454, % B $242,263, % C $277,918, % C $347,984, % B $171,600, % C $588, % D Rail 2 Mobility Statewide D $5,291,153,979 $97,259, % D $892,423, % D $267,117, % D $98,172, % D $182,800, % D $48,840, % D Non-Highway (All) 6 $8,758,482,626 $1,642,355, % $2,361,388, % $1,864,248, % $1,586,919, % $1,618,240, % $644,095, % Safety 9 All Tiers Hazard Elimination / Spot Safety 7 C $673,622,000 $144,000, % D $194,320, % D $173,124, % D $144,000, % D $274,000, % C $235,250, % D Statewide C $19,449,281,364 $4,475,211, % B $2,081,690, % C $2,613,646, % C $3,161,980, % C $3,465,027, % B $4,254,332, % B Mobility Regional B $7,798,666,336 $678,441, % B $381,407, % B $572,752, % B $589,220, % B $396,800, % B $429,599, % B Subregional N/A 3 $6,388,489,241 $643,402, % N/A 3 $521,853, % N/A* $416,169, % N/A* $596,701, % N/A* $198,400, % N/A 3 $349,090, % N/A 3 Highway Health 4 Interstate Pavement B $1,450,032,950 $560,000, % D $658,297, % D $629,044, % D $682,311, % C $806,700, % C $928,862, % B Statewide Pavement (Contract Resurfacing) 7 D $585,155,000 $250,845, % F $318,279, % D $342,830, % D $331,788, % D $459,300, % C $454,116, % C Modernization N/A 3 $553,471,800 $566, % N/A 3 $541, % N/A* $652, % N/A* $50,308, % N/A* $1,325, % N/A 3 $71,569, % N/A 3 Pavement (Contract Regional Resurfacing) 7 D $1,065,695,000 $360,000, % F $566,531, % D $505,555, % D $451,173, % D $716,000, % C $653,484, % D Modernization N/A 3 $1,498,196,780 $63,759, % N/A 3 $54,732, % N/A* $63,759, % N/A* $63,759, % N/A* $66,688, % N/A 3 $15,400, % N/A 3 Pavement (Contract Subregional Resurfacing) 7 D $3,248,211,000 $809,789, % F $1,744,842, % F $1,687,306, % F $1,254,894, % F $859,520, % F $1,022,400, % F Modernization N/A 3 $342,640,904 $9,078, % N/A 3 $7,880, % N/A* $9,078, % N/A* $92,468, % N/A* $7,128, % N/A 3 $20,600, % N/A 3 All Tiers Bridge (fixed commitment) D $1,550,000,000 $1,284,540, % D $1,550,000, % D $1,550,000, % D $1,550,000, % D $1,537,600, % D $1,638,479, % D Highway (All) $45,249,301,357 $9,346,259, % $8,138,746, % $8,635,751, % $9,035,233, % $8,881,760, % $10,073,181, % TOTAL ALL BUCKETS $54,007,783,983 $10,988,614, % $10,500,135,449 $10,500,000,000 $10,622,153,500 $10,500,000,000 $10,717,276,000 1 Aviation Submitted Needs only reflect a two year period. 2 Rail LOS calculations do not include $545 million in ARRA funding to further develop the Southeast High-Speed Rail Corridor. 3 No LOS data available at this time. 4 This LOS calculation does not include ARRA projects. 5 LOS = Level of Service. See Introduction to Program & Resource Plan document for more information on LOS. 6 Non-Highway project programming is subject to further refinement in the future as more information becomes available. 7 Contract Resurfacing and Spot Safety are not included in the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). 8 This table does not include federally or locally funded or any unfunded Public Transportation project costs. For the period State Public Transportation funds support a $1.4B total capital program. 9 In 2011 " Safety (I,R,U)" projects previously in this category were integrated into Mobility or Health goal areas. 10 STIP = State Transportation Improvement Program NOTE: This Multi-Year Resource Strategy was used a guide to developing the STIP. Actual projects selected to meet this Strategy were subject to funding, legal, and scheduling constraints. Investment reflects mostly construction and engineering activities and is only a subset of the overall NCDOT budget. Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ), Non-Bicycle/Pedestrian Enhancements, Direct Attributable and Urban Loop projects are not included in these values. 18

25 This page intentionally left blank. 19

26 5 Year Work Program ( )

27 5 year work program The Work Program is the state s annual transportation program for projects and programs for the period , grouped into five categories: Construction & Engineering preliminary engineering, construction, right of way, environmental mitigation and other elements of capital projects Maintenance activities and projects to maintain our multi-modal transportation network Operations activities and projects to operate our multi-modal transportation network Administration management and support services Transfers dollars that are transferred out of NCDOT to other state agencies, the General Fund and NC Global TransPark Over the next five years, NCDOT expects to invest nearly $24 billion in transportation. Of these dollars, approximately 51 percent will go to improve mobility, 2 percent to improve safety and 40 percent to improve infrastructure health. Percentages are estimates, and categories may overlap. For example, money spent to improve mobility or infrastructure health in most cases will improve safety as well. The Project List section of this document outlines the resulting projects based on the selected investment strategy. These selections were constrained by Federal and State funding eligibility requirements, the equity formula, air quality conformity requirements and scheduling capabilities. This Work Program reflects the projects, programs, and services NCDOT commits to deliver over the next five years. Successful completion of our Work Program will improve transportation safety and mobility and the health of our transportation network. The Department s long-term goal is to achieve at least a 95 percent delivery rate on projects in the Work Program. 20

28 This page intentionally left blank. 21

29 Table 4 summary 5 Year work program Summary ($ in Millions) Prior Year Current Year Next Four Years 2010/ / / / / / Year Total Construction & Engineering $2,520 $2,577 $2,908 $3,027 $2,871 $2,752 $14,135 Planning & Preliminary Engineering $150 $152 $152 $152 $152 $152 $759 Right of Way $264 $249 $200 $200 $200 $200 $1,049 Construction $1,644 $1,513 $1,739 $1,776 $1,790 $1,800 $8,617 Construction Engineering & Inspection $48 $61 $77 $96 $108 $108 $450 Environmental Mitigation $58 $30 $30 $30 $30 $30 $150 Turnpike $356 $573 $710 $774 $592 $463 $3, Maintenance $1,132 $1,253 $1,349 $1,411 $1,422 $1,430 $6,864 Highway $997 $1,097 $1,182 $1,240 $1,240 $1,240 $5,999 Rail * $4 $6 $5 $5 $5 $24 State Aid to Municipalities $134 $138 $141 $143 $145 $146 $712 Turnpike * $14 $20 $23 $32 $38 $128 Operations $178 $213 $224 $223 $267 $278 $1,204 Ferry $34 $34 $43 $44 $45 $45 $211 Governor's Highway Safety Program $11 $12 $12 $12 $13 $13 $62 Highway $76 $81 $84 $81 $119 $126 $491 Rail * $27 $28 $29 $34 $38 $156 Public Transportation $57 $58 $56 $56 $56 $56 $283 Administration $260 $287 $294 $297 $301 $305 $1,483 Division of Motor Vehicles $92 $97 $98 $99 $100 $101 $494 Other NCDOT Administration $169 $189 $196 $199 $201 $204 $990 TOTAL PROGRAM $4,090 $4,330 $4,774 $4,958 $4,861 $4,765 $23,686 Transfers $375 $339 $330 $307 $310 $313 $1,599 TOTAL WORK PROGRAM BUDGET $4,465 $4,669 $5,103 $5,264 $5,171 $5,078 $25,286 Notes: All years are State Fiscal Years (July 1- June 30). All values throughout this Work Program reflect planned cash spending amounts, in millions, unless otherwise noted. This Work Program is based on the revenue forecasts that were used for the Governor's Recommended Budget, constrained by the NCDOT Cash Model. The Highway Maintenance and Ferry Operations values reflect NCDOT's planned efforts in these areas. Any changes to this Work Program will be made through a formal amendment process. * These categories were not identified separately in the 2010 Work Program

30 This page intentionally left blank. 23

31 Table 5 construction & engineering 5 year work program Mode Goal Tier Prior Year Current Year Next Four Years 5 Year Total Aviation Safety Mobility Health Regional $8 $23 $23 $24 $25 $26 $121 Subregional $9 $9 $10 $11 $11 $50 Statewide $2 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $6 Regional $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $6 Statewide $4 $2 $2 $2 $2 $2 $10 Regional $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $3 Subregional $0.4 $0.4 $0.4 $0.4 $0.4 $2 TOTAL $34 $37 $38 $39 $41 $42 $197 Bicycle & Pedestrian Mobility Statewide $0 $4 $4 $3 $3 $3 $18 Regional $1 $1 $4 $4 $9 Subregional $40 $35 $34 $41 $34 $11 $156 TOTAL $42 $39 $40 $49 $41 $14 $183 Ferry 3 Public Transportation 4 Health Safety Mobility Health Statewide $2 TOTAL $2 Regional $0.1 $0.1 Subregional $1 $1 Statewide $0.5 Regional $18 $26 $26 $55 $81 $96 $284 Subregional $1 $3 $5 $1 $5 $0.1 $14 Regional $2 $4 $2 $2 $3 $2 $13 Subregional $3 $3 $1 $1 $0.4 $0.04 $5 TOTAL $24 $37 $34 $58 $90 $98 $316 Safety Statewide $8 $13 $1 $1 $1 $1 $18 Rail 2 Mobility Statewide $77 $77 $80 $122 $119 $106 $504 TOTAL $138 $90 $81 $123 $120 $108 $523 Non-Highway (All) $241 $204 $192 $269 $292 $261 $1,219 Statewide $33 $20 $27 $7 $6 $6 $65 Safety Regional $13 $15 $4 $4 $1 $23 Highway Highway (All) Mobility Health TOTAL Subregional $28 $17 $10 $10 $15 $51 Statewide $1,593 $1,031 $1,196 $1,270 $1,132 $1,098 $5,727 Regional $134 $72 $90 $63 $83 $60 $369 Subregional $145 $479 $318 $171 $97 $90 $1,155 Statewide $180 $186 $223 $226 $272 $276 $1,183 Regional $52 $43 $33 $44 $42 $49 $211 Subregional $159 $162 $135 $71 $108 $103 $579 $2,338 $2,023 $2,036 $1,866 $1,756 $1,681 $9,362 $2,578 $2,226 $2,228 $2,135 $2,048 $1,942 $10,581 All dollars are in Millions. 1 These amounts are from September 2010 Work Program CMAQ and Enhancement funds were attributed to Regional Mobility. 2 These amounts include a portion of $545 million in ARRA funding to further develop the Southeast High-Speed Rail Corridor. 3 No capital ferry projects are programmed from Funds for Ferry Operations are shown in Table 7 - Operations 4 This table does not include federally or locally funded or any unfunded Public Transportation project costs. State Public Transportation funds support a $1.8 million Public Transportation capital program ( ). This table's values differ slightly from Table 4, which represents cash flow based on NCDOT Cash Model outputs. The amounts in this table are budget amounts shown over approximate years they are expected to be spent. This table represents State Trasportation Improvement Program (STIP) and Division Managed Construction project costs, which include Right of Way, Construction, Construction Engineering & Inspection, and Enviornmental Mitigation. This table does not include costs for Planning and Preliminary Engineering. 24

32 This page intentionally left blank. 25

33 highway maintenance General Statute (7) gives NCDOT full and exclusive responsibility for the maintenance of all roads other than streets in towns and cities, forming a part of the State highway system from date of acquiring said roads. The Department of Transportation shall have authority to maintain all streets constructed by the Department of Transportation in towns of less than 3,000 population by the last census, and such other streets as may be constructed in towns and cities at the expense of the Department of Transportation, whenever in the opinion of the Department of Transportation it is necessary and proper so to do. These activities include both work done by NCDOT and work done by contractors. The maintenance program consists primarily of the following functions: Road Maintenance Primary and Secondary System 1 maintenance funds are used for continuing routine maintenance activities including pavement patching, pavement markings, markers, signs, symbols, roadside vegetation management, drainage, unpaved shoulders, litter pickup and other similar maintenance activities. Bridge Maintenance Bridge maintenance funds are used for the maintenance of existing bridges, including foundations, support bents and flooring and rails, in order to maintain the structural integrity of the bridges. The replacement of critical small bridges and pipes is also eligible for this funding. The amounts recommended for bridge maintenance activities are based upon a maintenance needs inspection, numbers of deficient structures, structures with timber components and school bus loading of each state highway system bridge. Bridge maintenance funding is also used for rehabilitation and repair of concrete bridge decks, girder painting, emergency bridge repair or replacement, the repair or replacement of draw bridge electrical components and equipment and maintenance of navigational lighting systems on high-level bridges located over navigational waterways. Weigh Stations Maintenance funding is used to maintain 22 weigh stations at 11 locations across the state on the Primary Highway System. Condition Assessment and Performance Survey Maintenance funding is used to conduct an assessment of the condition of the State Highway System to develop performance measures and guidelines for the maintenance of the department s highway assets. Data collected from these surveys is used to develop maintenance plans for each division based on consistent performance measures and goals. 1 Maintenance program funding is currently categorized into primary and secondary systems. This differs from the tiered system (statewide, regional and sub-regional) used elsewhere in this document. The statewide tier makes up approximately 40% percent of the primary system. The regional tier represents the remaining 60% of the primary system. The subregional tier equates to the secondary system. More information about the tiered system may be found in the Definitions section of this document. 26

34 Other Maintenance Activities Other activities include: Inmate Labor, Historical Markers, Renovation of Rest Areas, Traffic Control Support at Major Events, State Park Maintenance, Oversize and Overweight Vehicle Fee administration, Drug and Alcohol Testing, Snow and Ice, Railroad Signals, Beaver Control, Management and Technical Training, Emergency Repairs, Non-TIP Pavement Activities and Traffic Signal Maintenance. 27

35 Table 6 maintenance 5 year work program Highway Maintenance 1 Rail State Aid to Municipalities Turnpike Prior Year Current Year Next Four Years Maintenance 2010/ / / / / /2016 ($ in Millions) Year Total Standing Road Maintenance $548 $521 $540 $545 $545 $545 $2,696 Standing Bridge Maintenance $81 $81 $82 $85 $85 $85 $418 System Preservation / Bridge 2 $100 $125 $175 $225 $225 $225 $975 Contract Resurfacing $258 $360 $375 $375 $375 $375 $1,860 Reserve for Disasters/Emergencies $10 $10 $10 $10 $10 $10 $50 Highway Maintenance $997 $1,097 $1,182 $1,240 $1,240 $1,240 $5, Spending Adjustments $3 Rail * $4 $6 $5 $5 $5 $24 Powell Bill $131 $138 $141 $143 $145 $146 $712 Turnpike Maintenance * $14 $20 $23 $32 $38 $128 Maintenance Total $1,132 $1,253 $1,349 $1,411 $1,422 $1,430 $6, Highway Maintenance values reflect NCDOT's planned efforts in this area. 2 Subject to Final Budget Revisions * These categories were not identified separately in 2010 Work Program.

36 This page intentionally left blank. 29

37 operations In addition to the capital projects outlined in this Policy to Projects document, NCDOT divisions and modes are extensively involved in the operational activities necessary after projects become ongoing programs of the Department. The Work Program includes funding levels for operations for these programs. Ferry Ferry personnel maintain all ferry vessels, buildings, facilities, and much of the equipment on all 21 ferries operated by the N.C. Ferry Division. The Ferry Division has a dredge that maintains all channels and harbors. The North Carolina Shipyard at Manns Harbor performs all ferry vessel dry docking, major repairs, refurbishment and extension of vessels. Governor s Highway Safety Program The GHSP runs several high-profile traffic safety campaigns annually. The Click It or Ticket program is a seat belt enforcement and educational program utilizing high-profile enforcement efforts, typically checkpoints, combined with intense media attention to get the enforcement message to motorists. In addition, GHSP runs programs called Booze It & Lose It, targeting drunk drivers at night; No Need 2 Speed, targeting speeders; R U Buckled? promoting high-school seat belt usage; and Nuestra Seguridad, to educate the growing Hispanic population as to the motor vehicle laws and safe driving practices needed to operate a motor vehicle safely in North Carolina. Highway Highway Operations includes traffic operations (including incident management and traffic signal maintenance), bridge inspection and rehabilitation, planting and beautification, and other operational activities. Public Transportation The Public Transportation Division (PTD) receives and allocates Federal and State funds to bus systems in urban, regional and rural areas to help with their operations and maintenance programs. These bus systems also receive local funds, fares and in the case of community systems, human service contracts. PTD staff, along with staff from the Institute for Transportation Research and Education (ITRE) at North Carolina State University, work with local transit systems to review operations and maintenance practices and develop ways to improve. 30

38 Table 7 Operations 5 year work program 31 Operations ($ in Millions) Prior Year Current Year Next Four Years 2010/ / / / / / Ferry 1 $41 $34 $43 $44 $45 $45 $ Spending Adjustment -$7 Ferry Total $34 $34 $43 $44 $45 $45 $211 Governor's Highway Safety Program (GHSP) $12 $12 $12 $12 $13 $13 $ Spending Adjustment -$0.4 GHSP Total $11 $12 $12 $12 $13 $13 $62 Highway 2 $76 $81 $84 $81 $119 $126 $491 Rail * $27 $28 $29 $34 $38 $156 Public Transportation $57 $58 $56 $56 $56 $56 $283 5 Year Total Operations Total $178 $213 $224 $223 $267 $278 $1,204 Operational Projects are included in the Project List section of this document. * This category was not identified separately in 2010 Work Program. 1 Ferry Operations values reflect NCDOT's planned efforts in this area. 2 FY 2011 Highway Operations value was modified from 2010 Work Program to exclude non-highway projects. FY spike in Highway Operations is due to funds set aside for future year operations programs.

39 Table 8 administration 5 year work program 32 Administration ($ in Millions) Prior Year Current Year Next Four Years 2010/ / / / / / Secretary of Transportation $2 $3 $3 $3 $3 $3 $14 Organizational Monitoring, Communication & Control $6 $6 $6 $6 $6 $6 $31 Transportation Strategy & Investment Analysis $15 $16 $17 $17 $18 $18 $87 Intergovernmental Affairs & Budget Coordination $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $3 Financial Management $15 $16 $17 $17 $17 $17 $83 Transportation Business Administration $29 $31 $32 $33 $33 $34 $163 Administration & Business Development $25 $27 $28 $29 $29 $30 $143 Human Resources $4 $4 $4 $4 $4 $4 $20 Transportation Process Management $45 $48 $51 $51 $52 $53 $255 Technical Services $4 $4 $4 $5 $5 $5 $22 Information Technology $41 $44 $46 $47 $47 $48 $233 Transportation Program & Asset Management $20 $21 $22 $22 $23 $23 $111 Transit $5 $6 $6 $6 $6 $6 $30 Highway Administration (excludes Divisions and Field Support) $14 $15 $16 $16 $17 $17 $81 Transportation Program Delivery $122 $129 $136 $138 $140 $142 $685 Divisions & Field Support $30 $32 $34 $34 $34 $35 $169 Division of Motor Vehicles $92 $97 $98 $99 $100 $101 $494 NC Turnpike Authority $4 $4 $4 $4 $4 $4 $20 DOT Administrative Total $242 $258 $271 $275 $279 $282 $1,365 Legislative Increase and Salary Reserves $16 $12 $6 $6 $6 $6 $35 Other Programs 1 $2 $17 $17 $17 $17 $17 $83 5 Year Total Administration Total $260 $287 $294 $297 $301 $305 $1,483 1 Other Programs includes funding for Minority Contractors, Fire Protection Grants, Stormwater Management, Major Repairs and Visitors' Centers

Successful performance management serves as

Successful performance management serves as ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT FOR PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT C A R L O S B R A C E R A S The author is Executive Director, Utah Department of Transportation, Salt Lake City; Chair, Project Panel on the U.S. Domestic

More information

and the statewide and metropolitan transportation planning and programming process in California:

and the statewide and metropolitan transportation planning and programming process in California: Financial constraint... and the statewide and metropolitan transportation planning and programming process in California: A GUIDE TO FEDERAL AND STATE FINANCIAL PLANNING REQUIREMENTS Prepared by: Federal

More information

South Carolina Multimodal Transportation Plan Vision, Goals, Objectives, and Performance Measures

South Carolina Multimodal Transportation Plan Vision, Goals, Objectives, and Performance Measures South Carolina Multimodal Transportation Plan Vision, Goals, Objectives, and Performance Measures Prepared for: Prepared by: June 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction... 1 1.1 Baseline Understanding...

More information

Examples of Transportation Plan Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures

Examples of Transportation Plan Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures Examples of Transportation Plan Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures The next step in the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) process is to develop goals, objectives, and performance measures.

More information

Chapter 5 Financial Plan

Chapter 5 Financial Plan The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA_LU) requires that the MTP incorporate a financial plan for the planning period. The MTP is required to

More information

annual report PERFORMANCE

annual report PERFORMANCE 5 annual report PERFORMANCE our MISSION Connecting people, products, and places safely and efficiently with customer focus, accountability, and environmental sensitivity to enhance the economy and vitality

More information

FINANCIAL PLAN AND INVESTMENT STRATEGIES

FINANCIAL PLAN AND INVESTMENT STRATEGIES FINANCIAL PLAN AND INVESTMENT STRATEGIES AUGUST 2012 The PFM Group and The PFM Group and Executive Summary North Carolina s statewide transportation plan (2040 Plan) is an effort to define the strategies

More information

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP) PROCEDURES FOR THE OKLAHOMA CITY URBANIZED AREA FUNDS

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP) PROCEDURES FOR THE OKLAHOMA CITY URBANIZED AREA FUNDS SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP) PROCEDURES FOR THE OKLAHOMA CITY URBANIZED AREA FUNDS October 2015 Background The Surface Transportation Program (STP) was originally established as Section 133 of

More information

INDOT 2000-2025 Long Range Plan

INDOT 2000-2025 Long Range Plan Chapter 9 INDOT 2000-2025 Long Range Plan Highway Needs Analysis Overview The statewide transportation planning process provides for the identification of highway needs through a comprehensive process

More information

MAINTENANCE. Infrastructure. Introduction. Safety. Policies & Programs. Summary EXISTING CONDITIONS

MAINTENANCE. Infrastructure. Introduction. Safety. Policies & Programs. Summary EXISTING CONDITIONS PAGE 2-60 installed in September and October 2014. At these locations the City of Greensboro installed Pyro Posts and ZELT Inductive Loops, provided by NCDOT for the program, to differentiate between pedestrians

More information

Chapter 4 ASSET INVENTORY AND CONDITION CHAPTER 4 ASSET INVENTORY AND CONDITION PAGE 33

Chapter 4 ASSET INVENTORY AND CONDITION CHAPTER 4 ASSET INVENTORY AND CONDITION PAGE 33 Chapter 4 ASSET INVENTORY AND CONDITION CHAPTER 4 ASSET INVENTORY AND CONDITION PAGE 33 This page intentionally left blank. PAGE 34 MINNESOTA GO MNDOT TRANSPORTATION ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN ASSET INVENTORY

More information

STATE OF MONTANA MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JOB PROFILE Update Formal Review

STATE OF MONTANA MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JOB PROFILE Update Formal Review STATE OF MONTANA MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JOB PROFILE Update Formal Review 6/3/2013 Date Submitted SECTION I - Identification Working Title: Multimodal Planning Bureau Chief Department: Transportation

More information

Texas Freight Advisory Committee A PRIMER ON PUBLIC SECTOR FREIGHT PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Texas Freight Advisory Committee A PRIMER ON PUBLIC SECTOR FREIGHT PERFORMANCE MEASURES Texas Freight Advisory Committee A PRIMER ON PUBLIC SECTOR FREIGHT PERFORMANCE MEASURES October 1, 2013 A PRIMER ON PUBLIC SECTOR FREIGHT PERFORMANCE MEASURES How Do Performance Measures Assist the Public

More information

Summary of MAP-21 Matrix

Summary of MAP-21 Matrix Summary of MAP-21 Matrix Overview On July 6, 2012, President Obama signed into law P.L. 112-141, the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). Funding surface transportation programs

More information

Finance Work Program Budget. FTC Workshop

Finance Work Program Budget. FTC Workshop Finance Work Program Budget FTC Workshop March 2010 Today s Presentation Basic Concepts Funding Sources Estimating Resources Finance Plan/Cash Forecast Cash Flow vs. Commitment Funding Priorities Work

More information

FHWA Transportation Performance Management Case Study. North Carolina DOT: Development of a Performance Management System

FHWA Transportation Performance Management Case Study. North Carolina DOT: Development of a Performance Management System FHWA Transportation Performance Management Case Study North Carolina DOT: Development of a Performance Management System October 2013 Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 1 A. NCDOT Facts B. Identifying

More information

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration SAFETY AWARENESS. 2007 Kentucky Freight Conference

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration SAFETY AWARENESS. 2007 Kentucky Freight Conference Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration SAFETY AWARENESS 2007 Kentucky Freight Conference FMCSA History Federal Highway Administration restructured in February, 1999 October 9, 1999 created a separate

More information

Federal Requirements for Statewide Transportation Plans

Federal Requirements for Statewide Transportation Plans Federal Requirements for Statewide Transportation Plans Title 23, U.S.C. 135 - Statewide and nonmetropolitan transportation planning (a) General Requirements. - (1) Development of plans and programs. -

More information

Final NPS Alternative Transportation Program Strategic Action Plan, 2012 2016

Final NPS Alternative Transportation Program Strategic Action Plan, 2012 2016 Final NPS Alternative Transportation Program Strategic Action Plan, 2012 2016 FY 2012 Executive summary This plan is an action oriented, performance based update to the 2002 2006 Alternative Transportation

More information

Performance Elements

Performance Elements Performance Elements National Goals Performance Measures Performance Targets Performance Plans Target Achievement Special Performance Rules Performance Reporting National Goals Focus the Federal aid program

More information

2035 FINANCIAL RESOURCES FORECAST

2035 FINANCIAL RESOURCES FORECAST 2035 FINANCIAL RESOURCES FORECAST AKRON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 806 CITICENTER BUILDING 146 SOUTH HIGH STREET AKRON, OHIO 44308 December 2012 This report was prepared by the Akron Metropolitan

More information

12MAP-21, a funding and authorization bill to govern U.S. federal surface MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE

12MAP-21, a funding and authorization bill to govern U.S. federal surface MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE 12MAP-21, a funding and authorization bill to govern U.S. federal surface transportation spending, creates a data-driven, performance-based multimodal program

More information

Transportation Asset Management Case Studies. Presented by COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION ASSET MANAGEMENT. The North Carolina Experience, Part Two

Transportation Asset Management Case Studies. Presented by COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION ASSET MANAGEMENT. The North Carolina Experience, Part Two Transportation Asset Management Case Studies i Presented by COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION ASSET MANAGEMENT The North Carolina Experience, Part Two FRONT COVER PHOTO: Figure I-26 Interchange with NC 146

More information

Technical Memorandum REVENUE FORECASTS. Prepared for: Prepared by:

Technical Memorandum REVENUE FORECASTS. Prepared for: Prepared by: Technical Memorandum REVENUE FORECASTS Prepared for: Prepared by: April 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction... 1 1.1 Inflation Indices... 2 1.2 Previous Studies... 3 2 Highway Revenue Baseline Forecast...

More information

CHAPTER 4 SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP)

CHAPTER 4 SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP) Local Assistance Program Guidelines Chapter 4 CHAPTER 4 SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP) CONTENTS Section Subject Page Number 4.1 INTRODUCTION... 4-1 4.2 ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA... 4-1 General... 4-1

More information

Program guidance that details the eligibility, criteria and application process. Ferry Boat Program. Ohio Department of Transportation

Program guidance that details the eligibility, criteria and application process. Ferry Boat Program. Ohio Department of Transportation Program guidance that details the eligibility, criteria and application process. Ferry Boat Program Ohio Department of Transportation TABLE OF CONTENTS Program Overview Program Administration.........2

More information

Activity Management Plan Overview

Activity Management Plan Overview Trevor Kerr Timaru District Council Activity Management Plan Overview 2012 2022 Transport Table of Contents 1. What we do now?... 5 1.1. Transport Assets... 5 1.2. Transport Activities... 5 2. Key Network

More information

GAO U.S. INFRASTRUCTURE. Funding Trends and Federal Agencies Investment Estimates. Testimony

GAO U.S. INFRASTRUCTURE. Funding Trends and Federal Agencies Investment Estimates. Testimony GAO For Release on Delivery Expected at 3:00 p.m. EST Monday July 23, 2001 United States General Accounting Office Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Transportation and Infrastructure, Committee on Environment

More information

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Funding Highlights: Invests a total of $74 billion in discretionary and mandatory budgetary resources for the Department

More information

Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 202-366-4000

Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 202-366-4000 1 of 8 12/27/2013 8:21 AM U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 202-366-4000 MAP-21 - Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century

More information

Federal Guidelines for STP-U Funding

Federal Guidelines for STP-U Funding MPC 5.f Attachment 1 STP-U Eligibility Guidelines Page 1 of 5 Federal Guidelines for STP-U Funding SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP) ELIGIBLE EXPENDITURES PERIOD AVAILABLE: FY + 3 Years FUND: Highway

More information

Preapplication for HSIPR Program OMB No. 2130 0583

Preapplication for HSIPR Program OMB No. 2130 0583 U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Railroad Administration Preapplication for HSIPR Program OMB No. 2130 0583 Preapplication instructions: For each question, enter the appropriate information in

More information

AASHTO First Take at the New Surface Transportation Bill FIXING AMERICA S SURFACE TRANSPORTATION (FAST) ACT December 2, 2015

AASHTO First Take at the New Surface Transportation Bill FIXING AMERICA S SURFACE TRANSPORTATION (FAST) ACT December 2, 2015 AASHTO First Take at the New Surface Transportation Bill FIXING AMERICA S SURFACE TRANSPORTATION (FAST) ACT December 2, 2015 OVERVIEW On December 1, 2015, the House-Senate Conference Committee on H.R.

More information

Safe Transportation System. Tangible Result Driver Leanna Depue, Highway Safety Director

Safe Transportation System. Tangible Result Driver Leanna Depue, Highway Safety Director Tangible Result Driver Leanna Depue, Highway Safety Director MoDOT works closely with other safety advocates to make our roads and work zones safer. The department supports educational programs that encourage

More information

2015 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (UTP)

2015 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (UTP) 2015 UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (UTP) Overview and Update Process Key Elements TxDOT s 10-year plan to guide transportation development Required by the Texas Administrative Code (TAC, Section 16.105)

More information

Chapter 2 ASSET MANAGEMENT PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING FRAMEWORK CHAPTER 2 ASSET MANAGEMENT PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING FRAMEWORK PAGE 11

Chapter 2 ASSET MANAGEMENT PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING FRAMEWORK CHAPTER 2 ASSET MANAGEMENT PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING FRAMEWORK PAGE 11 Chapter 2 ASSET MANAGEMENT PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING FRAMEWORK CHAPTER 2 ASSET MANAGEMENT PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING FRAMEWORK PAGE 11 This page intentionally left blank. PAGE 12 MINNESOTA GO MNDOT TRANSPORTATION

More information

Fiscal Year 2015 Quarter 4 April - June 2015 Stephanie Pollack Secretary & CEO

Fiscal Year 2015 Quarter 4 April - June 2015 Stephanie Pollack Secretary & CEO Performance and Accountability Report Fiscal Year 2015 Quarter 4 April - June 2015 Stephanie Pollack Secretary & CEO Prepared by: Office of Performance Management & Innovation August 2015 Inside This Issue

More information

(This Page Intentionally Left Blank)

(This Page Intentionally Left Blank) (This Page Intentionally Left Blank) Transportation Asset Management Plan Florida Department of Transportation October 2015 For more information, go to http://www.dot.state.fl.us/planning/tamp (This Page

More information

TRANSPORTATION Carson Howell, Analyst

TRANSPORTATION Carson Howell, Analyst State of Utah FY 2008 Budget Recommendations Carson Howell, Analyst AGENCY BUDGET OVERVIEW Mission: Build and maintain the State s transportation system, plan and implement new highway projects, improve

More information

Capital Improvement Program: Public Input and the Need for a Multi-year Plan

Capital Improvement Program: Public Input and the Need for a Multi-year Plan Attachment 1 OFFICE OF THE INDEPENDENT BUDGET ANALYST REPORT Date Issued: September 21, 2012 IBA Report Number: 12-39 Budget and Finance Committee Docket Date: September 26, 2012 Item Number: 8 OVERVIEW

More information

PRIORITIZATION PROCESSES

PRIORITIZATION PROCESSES PROJECT SELECTION & PRIORITIZATION PROCESSES STIP Workshop Presented by: Bill Lawrence April 2011 Purpose and Review Overview of Project Selection Process Review Various Prioritization Processes Tk Take

More information

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century. 2014 Performance Report

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century. 2014 Performance Report MAP 21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century 2014 Performance Report A report to Florida s Congressional Delegation March 2014 Overview: Because life is precious, FDOT has set the highway safety

More information

MAP 21 themes. Strengthens America s highway and public transportation systems. Supports the Department s aggressive safety agenda

MAP 21 themes. Strengthens America s highway and public transportation systems. Supports the Department s aggressive safety agenda MAP 21 themes Strengthens America s highway and public transportation systems Creates jobs and supports economic growth Supports the Department s aggressive safety agenda Simplifies and focuses the Federal

More information

Wilmington Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Surface Transportation Program Direct Attributable Project Submittal Guide Fiscal Year 2016

Wilmington Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Surface Transportation Program Direct Attributable Project Submittal Guide Fiscal Year 2016 Wilmington Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Surface Transportation Program Direct Attributable Project Submittal Guide Fiscal Year 2016 Date of Release: September 14, 2015 Pre application

More information

Pavement Management System Overview

Pavement Management System Overview TABLE OF CONTENTS The Home Screen... 3 The Gutter... 4 Icons... 4 Quick Links... 5 Miscellaneous... 6 PMS Menus... 7 Setup Menu... 7 Construction Setup... 7 1. Material Codes... 8 2. Standard Sections...

More information

Township of Enniskillen. Asset Management Plan

Township of Enniskillen. Asset Management Plan Township of Enniskillen Asset Management Plan 2014 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page A. Introduction 3 B. State of Local Infrastructure 4 C. Desired Levels of Service 7 D. Asset Management Strategy 8 E. Financing

More information

STIP Process to Add NY Works Accelerated Bridge & Pavement Preservation Programs

STIP Process to Add NY Works Accelerated Bridge & Pavement Preservation Programs STIP Process to Add NY Works Accelerated Bridge & Pavement Preservation Programs Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ s) 1 - What is this accelerated transportation program? In December 2011, Governor Cuomo

More information

Comprehensive Transportation Services

Comprehensive Transportation Services Comprehensive Transportation Services Innovative Responsive Sustainable Award-winning Gannett Fleming is a global infrastructure firm focused on planning, design, technology, and construction management

More information

REFERENCE SERIES: Transportation in Connecticut ARTICLE NO. 02 Potential Federal-Aid Sources

REFERENCE SERIES: Transportation in Connecticut ARTICLE NO. 02 Potential Federal-Aid Sources REFERENCE SERIES: Transportation in Connecticut ARTICLE NO. 02 Potential Federal-Aid Sources THIS DOCUMENT IS IN TEXT ONLY FORMAT - A FULLY FORMATTED DOCUMENT WITH GRAPHICS IS AVAILABLE AT THE CT DOT WEBSITE

More information

KENTUCKY Technical Resources on the Internet. KENTUCKY TRANSPORTATION CABINET http://www.transportation.ky.gov/default2.html

KENTUCKY Technical Resources on the Internet. KENTUCKY TRANSPORTATION CABINET http://www.transportation.ky.gov/default2.html KENTUCKY Technical Resources on the Internet KENTUCKY TRANSPORTATION CABINET http://www.transportation.ky.gov/default2.html TRAFFIC SAFETY Safety Laws Traffic Records -Highway Fatalities -New Initiatives

More information

Safety Data Collection, Analysis, and Sharing

Safety Data Collection, Analysis, and Sharing Safety Data Collection, Analysis, and Sharing About the HSIP Noteworthy Practice Series The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is a core Federal-aid highway program with the primary purpose of achieving

More information

2012-2013 Transition from SAFETEA-LU to the new MAP-21 Federal Transportation Act

2012-2013 Transition from SAFETEA-LU to the new MAP-21 Federal Transportation Act C h a p t e r 9 - F i n a n c i a l P l a n a n d R e c o m m e n d a t i o n s f o r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m I m p r o v e m e n t P r o j e c t s A major component of the Plan (T2040)

More information

Appendix A Alternative Contracting General Engineering Consultant RFP. Appendix A

Appendix A Alternative Contracting General Engineering Consultant RFP. Appendix A Appendix A 1 1.0 Requirements and Minimum Qualifications This section outlines requirements and minimum qualifications for the GEC. It is anticipated that the GEC will be used to support and supplement

More information

Iowa Smart Planning. Legislative Guide March 2011

Iowa Smart Planning. Legislative Guide March 2011 Iowa Smart Planning Legislative Guide March 2011 Rebuild Iowa Office Wallace State Office Building 529 East 9 th St Des Moines, IA 50319 515-242-5004 www.rio.iowa.gov Iowa Smart Planning Legislation The

More information

Corridors & Other Initiatives. Future of Florida Virtual Seminar Series

Corridors & Other Initiatives. Future of Florida Virtual Seminar Series FDOT Up-Close: Future Corridors & Other Initiatives Future of Florida Virtual Seminar Series June 6, 2012 Today s Presenters Kathleen Neill Director, Office of Policy Planning Bob Romig State Transportation

More information

ASSET MANAGEMENT. ASHE East Penn Web-Ex October 17th, 2013. Asset Management The right solution at the right time. 1 www.dot.state.pa.

ASSET MANAGEMENT. ASHE East Penn Web-Ex October 17th, 2013. Asset Management The right solution at the right time. 1 www.dot.state.pa. Implement/ Evaluate Performance Inventory/ Assess Condition Asset Management The right solution at the right time Develop Strategy Identify Needs/ Resources ASSET MANAGEMENT ASHE East Penn Web-Ex October

More information

Technical Memorandum PERFORMANCE MEASURES. Prepared by:

Technical Memorandum PERFORMANCE MEASURES. Prepared by: Technical Memorandum PERFORMANCE MEASURES Prepared by: March 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary... 1 1. Introduction... 2 1.1 Performance Measures and the Public Sector... 2 1.2 National Focus: MAP

More information

Chapter VIII: Long-Term Outlook and the Financial Plan

Chapter VIII: Long-Term Outlook and the Financial Plan A. Long-Term Outlook Chapter VIII: Long-Term Outlook and the Financial Plan When examining the long-term outlook for transportation planning and programming over the foreseeable future, there are several

More information

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION. DOT Is Progressing toward a Performance-Based Approach, but States and Grantees Report Potential Implementation Challenges

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION. DOT Is Progressing toward a Performance-Based Approach, but States and Grantees Report Potential Implementation Challenges United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Addressees January 2015 SURFACE TRANSPORTATION DOT Is Progressing toward a Performance-Based Approach, but States and Grantees Report

More information

MISSOURI TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS:

MISSOURI TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS: MISSOURI TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS: Meeting the State s Need for Safe and Efficient Mobility APRIL 2015 202-466-6706 tripnet.org Founded in 1971, TRIP of Washington, DC, is a nonprofit organization

More information

annual report PERFORMANCE

annual report PERFORMANCE 4 annual report PERFORMANCE NC Department of Transportation our MISSION Connecting people and places safely and efficiently, with accountability and environmental sensitivity to enhance the economy, health

More information

Multimodal Transportation Planning at the State Level State of the Practice and Future Issues

Multimodal Transportation Planning at the State Level State of the Practice and Future Issues A1D01: Committee on Statewide Multimodal Transportation Planning Chairman: Neil J. Pedersen Multimodal Transportation Planning at the State Level State of the Practice and Future Issues NEIL J. PEDERSEN,

More information

Analysis of the 2015 Senate Surface Transportation Reauthorization Plan: The DRIVE Act

Analysis of the 2015 Senate Surface Transportation Reauthorization Plan: The DRIVE Act Analysis of the 2015 Senate Surface Transportation Reauthorization Plan: The DRIVE Act The Developing a Reliable and Innovative Vision for the Economy Act, or DRIVE Act, which was approved 65 to 34 July

More information

How To Improve Road Quality

How To Improve Road Quality A Customer Service Level Approach for Maine DOT s Asset Management System Jeffrey L. Zavitski, B.A. Senior Implementation Specialist Deighton Associates Limited Chip Getchell, P.E. Director, Work Plan

More information

Final. North Carolina Procurement Transformation. Governance Model March 11, 2011

Final. North Carolina Procurement Transformation. Governance Model March 11, 2011 North Carolina Procurement Transformation Governance Model March 11, 2011 Executive Summary Design Approach Process Governance Model Overview Recommended Governance Structure Recommended Governance Processes

More information

Where Do We Want to Go? How Can We Get There?

Where Do We Want to Go? How Can We Get There? Where Do We Want to Go? How Can We Get There? The BRTB has adopted nine goals, with supporting strategies, performance measures, and performance targets. Together, these goals, strategies, measures, and

More information

Asset Information Management System (AIMS) Report. Executive Summary

Asset Information Management System (AIMS) Report. Executive Summary Asset Information Management System (AIMS) Report Executive Summary The City of New York Michael R. Bloomberg, Mayor Fiscal Year 2014 T H E C I T Y O F N E W Y O R K O F F I C E O F T H E M A Y O R N E

More information

Programs and Funding variety of grant programs listed below.

Programs and Funding variety of grant programs listed below. Programs and Funding Federal, state and local government are partners in funding public transportation activities, with each contributing a portion of the costs. Relative funding proportions can vary from

More information

Asset Management Performance Report (Asset Management Plan Phase 1)

Asset Management Performance Report (Asset Management Plan Phase 1) 2016 Asset Management Performance Report (Asset Management Plan Phase 1) Prepared by the California Department of Transportation In Accordance with Government Code Section 14526.5 Table of Contents Executive

More information

INDIANA STATE BUDGET AGENCY. Capital Budget Development Process for FY 2014 and FY 2015

INDIANA STATE BUDGET AGENCY. Capital Budget Development Process for FY 2014 and FY 2015 INDIANA STATE BUDGET AGENCY Capital Budget Development Process for FY 2014 and FY 2015 Successful capital planning and budgeting requires long-term planning, looking well beyond the current biennium to

More information

Comprehensive Mobility Project Development Process Capital Metro ¼-Cent Fund Analysis

Comprehensive Mobility Project Development Process Capital Metro ¼-Cent Fund Analysis Comprehensive Mobility Project Development Process Capital Metro ¼-Cent Fund Analysis Transportation & Mobility projects that meet the following criteria: enhances regional mobility; supports public transit;

More information

WASHINGTON STATE TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS:

WASHINGTON STATE TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS: WASHINGTON STATE TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS: Meeting the State s Need for Safe and Efficient Mobility MARCH 2014 202-466-6706 www.tripnet.org Founded in 1971, TRIP of Washington, DC, is a nonprofit

More information

Department of Transportation

Department of Transportation DOT- Overview Department of Transportation 2.1% decrease from FY01 to FY02, 2.2% decrease from FY02 to FY03 Aviation study reveals a need for increased funding for local airport infrastructure (H.B. 95

More information

Surface Transportation Program (STP) Projects

Surface Transportation Program (STP) Projects Toledo Metropolitan Area Council of Governments American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (Economic Stimulus Program) Application Packet for: Surface Transportation Program (STP) Projects APPLICATIONS DUE

More information

TRANSPORTATION ASSET MANAGEMENT The Strategic Direction of Georgia Department of Transportation

TRANSPORTATION ASSET MANAGEMENT The Strategic Direction of Georgia Department of Transportation 2011 TRANSPORTATION ASSET MANAGEMENT The Strategic Direction of Georgia Department of Transportation Division of Organizational Performance Management 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I II III IV EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.3

More information

New Mexico DOT Transportation Asset Management Implementation Plan. final plan

New Mexico DOT Transportation Asset Management Implementation Plan. final plan New Mexico DOT Transportation Asset Management Implementation Plan final plan February 23, 2015 report New Mexico DOT Transportation Asset Management Implementation Plan date February 23, 2015 Table

More information

The Department intends to select one team. The contract will be for two years with a one year extension at the discretion of the Department.

The Department intends to select one team. The contract will be for two years with a one year extension at the discretion of the Department. TITLE: Statewide Asset Management Plan REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS USING AGENCY: NC Department of Transportation State Asset Management ISSUE DATE: November 15, 2013 SUBMITTAL DEADLINE: December 17, 2013 at

More information

2013 Kansas Transportation Summit

2013 Kansas Transportation Summit 2013 Kansas Transportation Summit Summary More than 300 Kansans participated in the Kansas Transportation Summit on Sept. 5 in Emporia. This is the first event hosted jointly by the Kansas Department of

More information

Chapter 8 Funding Considerations

Chapter 8 Funding Considerations Chapter 8 Funding Considerations Expanding transit services into El Dorado Hills under any of the service alternatives has associated operating and capital costs. This chapter considers the funding sources

More information

edmonton road safety strategy 2016 2020 Vision Zero zero fatalities and major injuries in edmonton

edmonton road safety strategy 2016 2020 Vision Zero zero fatalities and major injuries in edmonton edmonton road safety strategy 2016 2020 Vision Zero zero fatalities and major injuries in edmonton introduction targets for 2015-2020 principles engineering education enforcement evaluation engagement

More information

VRE SYSTEM PLAN SUMMARY

VRE SYSTEM PLAN SUMMARY VRE System Plan Summary January 2014 VRE SYSTEM PLAN SUMMARY VRE A Cost-Effective Contributor to Regional Mobility During the last decade, VRE has demonstrated its ability to accommodate a rapid and substantial

More information

Job Code Job Title Function Sub Function EEO 4. TRM011 Sr Mgr, Air Transport Admin Front Line Mgr Senior Manager Professionals N

Job Code Job Title Function Sub Function EEO 4. TRM011 Sr Mgr, Air Transport Admin Front Line Mgr Senior Manager Professionals N TRM010 Mgr, Air Transport Admin Front Line Mgr Manager (1,2,3) Professionals M Manages the operation of an aviation program or air transportation office. Develops and implements flight safety and maintenance

More information

FINANCIAL PLAN. Any future earmarks are assumed to carry their own limitation and not reduce the regular limitation identified in these calculations.

FINANCIAL PLAN. Any future earmarks are assumed to carry their own limitation and not reduce the regular limitation identified in these calculations. VII. FINANCIAL PLAN FHWA Funds The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) funds are appropriated by Congress. FHWA funding levels are identified in the six-year Transportation Act. Each year, a federal

More information

2016-2017 PRELIMINARY BUDGET HANDBOOK

2016-2017 PRELIMINARY BUDGET HANDBOOK 2016-2017 PRELIMINARY BUDGET HANDBOOK This page is intentionally left blank FY2016-2017 PRELIMINARY BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS Revenue In FY2017 the preliminary revenue for the District, excluding State on-behalf

More information

Wilmington to Newark Commuter Rail Improvement Project

Wilmington to Newark Commuter Rail Improvement Project Wilmington to Newark Commuter Rail Improvement Project The Delaware Transit Corporation (DTC), a subsidiary of the Delaware Department of Transportation (DelDOT), is undertaking a rail capacity expansion

More information

FACILITIES MAINTENANCE

FACILITIES MAINTENANCE Program Direction and Accountability 1. The district s maintenance and operations department has a mission statement and goals and objectives that are established in writing. a. The maintenance department

More information

MAP-21 National Public Transportation Safety and Transit Asset Management Requirements

MAP-21 National Public Transportation Safety and Transit Asset Management Requirements MAP-21 National Public Transportation Safety and Transit Asset Management Requirements Allison I. Fultz Kaplan Kirsch & Rockwell LLP Washington, DC 2013 APTA ANNUAL MEETING Chicago, IL October 1, 2013

More information

Asset Management Plan

Asset Management Plan Example Transportation Asset Management Plan Outline This outline was created using the Transportation Asset Management Plan (TAMP) Builder ( www.tamptemplate.org ), a product of NCHRP Project 8-36/116.

More information

Congestion Management Systems: A Federal Perspective. 7 Key CMS Components

Congestion Management Systems: A Federal Perspective. 7 Key CMS Components Congestion Management Systems: A Federal Perspective Brian Betlyon FHWA Resource Center brian.betlyon@fhwa.dot.gov 7 Key CMS Components 1. Area of Application 2. System Definition (modes & network) 4.

More information

VIII. TRANSPORTATION

VIII. TRANSPORTATION VIII. TRANSPORTATION Railroad Railroads came to Vermont and Mount Holly in the late 1840s and early 1850s. The Rutland and Burlington Railroad was originally built through Mount Holly to Bellows Falls.

More information

COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF THE FINANCIAL PLAN PROCESS: HOW TO ORGANIZE FOR FINANCIAL PLANNING

COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF THE FINANCIAL PLAN PROCESS: HOW TO ORGANIZE FOR FINANCIAL PLANNING COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF THE FINANCIAL PLAN The purpose of organizing for financial planning is to develop a set of assumptions, information, and forecasts that are reliable and consistent across different

More information

The 2016-17 Budget: The Governor s Proposition 2 Debt Proposal

The 2016-17 Budget: The Governor s Proposition 2 Debt Proposal The 2016-17 Budget: The Governor s Proposition 2 Debt Proposal MAC TAYLOR LEGISLATIVE ANALYST FEBRUARY 2016 Summary Proposition 2 requires the state to pay down a minimum annual amount of state debts.

More information

Senate Bill No. 1266 CHAPTER 25

Senate Bill No. 1266 CHAPTER 25 Senate Bill No. 1266 CHAPTER 25 An act to add Chapter 12.49 (commencing with Section 8879.20) to Division 1 of Title 2 of the Government Code, relating to transportation, by providing the funds necessary

More information

Rate Methodology Task Force Act 55

Rate Methodology Task Force Act 55 Rate Methodology Task Force Act 55 May 27, 2014 > 1 Rate Methodology Task Force Agenda for Today: Introduction of Task Force Members Purpose and Goals Background Development of the Framework Pennsylvania

More information

Primer on Transportation Funding and Governance in Canada s Large Metropolitan Areas

Primer on Transportation Funding and Governance in Canada s Large Metropolitan Areas Transportation Association of Canada Primer on Transportation Funding and Governance in Canada s Large Metropolitan Areas The transportation funding and governance frameworks of Canada s metropolitan regions

More information

Relationships Between Asset Management and Travel Demand: Findings and Recommendations from Four State DOT Site Visits

Relationships Between Asset Management and Travel Demand: Findings and Recommendations from Four State DOT Site Visits Relationships Between Asset : Findings and Recommendations from Four State DOT Site Visits Relationships Between Asset Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1. Executive Summary... 1 1.1 Background...

More information

Maintenance Management and Asset Management

Maintenance Management and Asset Management Defining and Understanding the Difference Between Maintenance Management and Asset Management Dr. Simon Lewis AgileAssets, Inc. 12th AASHTO-TRB Maintenance Management Conference Annapolis Maryland, July

More information

The Establishing and Integrating Performance Measures Peer Exchange in Dimondale, Michigan

The Establishing and Integrating Performance Measures Peer Exchange in Dimondale, Michigan Transportation Planning Capacity Building Program Establishing and Integrating Performance Measures A TPCB Peer Exchange Location: Dimondale, Michigan Date: April 27-28, 2015 Host Agency: Peer Agencies:

More information

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21)

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21) Streets and Freeways Subcommittee Meeting Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21) September 20, 2012 Metro s America Fast Forward Proposal Included in MAP-21 Act Enhances Transportation

More information

Analysis of the 2015 House Surface Transportation Reauthorization Plan: The Surface Transportation Reauthorization and Reform Act of 2015

Analysis of the 2015 House Surface Transportation Reauthorization Plan: The Surface Transportation Reauthorization and Reform Act of 2015 Analysis of the 2015 House Surface Transportation Reauthorization Plan: The Surface Transportation Reauthorization and Reform Act of 2015 Background The Surface Transportation Reauthorization and Reform

More information