Multiperiod Portfolio Optimization with General Transaction Costs


 Heather Houston
 1 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Multieriod Portfolio Otimization with General Transaction Costs Victor DeMiguel Deartment of Management Science and Oerations, London Business School, London NW1 4SA, UK, Xiaoling Mei Deartment of Statistics, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Leganés (Madrid), Sain, Francisco J. Nogales Deartment of Statistics, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Leganés (Madrid), Sain, We analyze the roerties of the otimal ortfolio olicy for a multieriod meanvariance investor facing multile risky assets in the resence of general transaction costs such as roortional, market imact, and quadratic transaction costs. For roortional transaction costs, we find that a buyandhold olicy is otimal: if the starting ortfolio is outside a arallelogramshaed notrade region, then trade to the boundary of the notrade region at the first eriod, and hold this ortfolio thereafter. For market imact costs, we show that the otimal ortfolio olicy at each eriod is to trade to the boundary of a statedeendent rebalancing region. Moreover, we find that the rebalancing region shrinks along the investment horizon, and as a result the investor trades throughout the entire investment horizon. Finally, we show numerically that the utility loss associated with ignoring transaction costs or investing myoically may be large. Key words: Portfolio otimization; Multieriod utility; Notrade region; Market imact 1. Introduction Markowitz (1952) showed that an investor who only cares about the mean and variance of singleeriod ortfolio returns should choose a ortfolio on the efficient frontier. Two assumtions underlying Markowitz s analysis are that the investor only cares about singleeriod returns and that she is not subject to transaction costs. In this manuscrit we consider the case where these two assumtions fail to hold, and study the otimal ortfolio olicy of a multieriod meanvariance investor subject to general transaction costs, including roortional, market imact, and quadratic transaction costs. There is an extensive literature that generalizes Markowitz s work to the multieriod case. Mossin (1968), Samuelson (1969), and Merton (1969, 1971) show how an investor should otimally choose her ortfolio in a dynamic environment in the absence of transaction costs. In ractice, however, imlementing a dynamic ortfolio olicy requires one to rebalance the ortfolio weights frequently, and this may result in high 1
2 2 DeMiguel, Mei, and Nogales: Multieriod Portfolio Otimization with General Transaction Costs transaction costs. To address this issue, researchers have tried to characterize the otimal ortfolio olicies in the resence of transaction costs. The case with a singlerisky asset and roortional transaction costs is well understood. In a multieriod setting, Constantinides (1979) shows that the otimal trading olicy is characterized by a notrade interval, such that if the riskyasset ortfolio weight is inside this interval, then it is otimal not to trade, and if the ortfolio weight is outside, then it is otimal to trade to the boundary of this interval. Later, Constantinides (1986) and Davis and Norman (1990) extend this result to a continuoustime setting with a single risky asset. The case with multile risky assets is much harder to characterize, and the existent literature is scarce. Akian et al. (1996) consider a multile riskyasset version of the continuous time model by Davis and Norman (1990), and using simulations they suggest that the otimal ortfolio olicy is characterized by a multidimensional notrade region. Leland (2000) develos a relatively simle numerical rocedure to comute the notrade region based on the existence results of Akian et al. (1996). The only aer that rovides an analytical characterization of the notrade region for the case with multile risky assets is the one by Liu (2004), who shows that under the assumtion that asset returns are uncorrelated, the otimal ortfolio olicy is characterized by a searate notrade interval for each risky asset. 1 None of the aforementioned aers characterizes analytically the notrade region for the general case with multile risky assets with correlated returns and transaction costs. The reason for this is that the analysis in these aers relies on modeling the asset return distribution, and as a result they must take ortfolio growth into account, which renders the roblem intractable analytically. Recently, Garleanu and Pedersen (2012) consider a setting that relies on modeling rice changes, and thus they are able to give closedform exressions for the otimal dynamic ortfolio olicies in the resence of quadratic transaction cost. Arguably, modeling rice changes is not very different from modeling stock returns, at least for daily or higher trading frequencies, yet the former aroach renders the roblem tractable. We make three contributions. Our first contribution is to use the multieriod framework roosed by Garleanu and Pedersen (2012) to characterize the otimal ortfolio olicy for the general case with multile risky assets and roortional transaction costs. Secifically, we characterize analytically that there exists a notrade region, shaed as a arallelogram, such that if the starting ortfolio is inside the notrade region, then it is otimal not to trade at any eriod. If, on the other hand, the starting ortfolio is outside the notrade region, then it is otimal to trade to the boundary of the notrade region in the first eriod, and not to trade thereafter. Furthermore, we show that the size of the notrade region grows with the level of roortional 1 Other aers rovide numerical solutions to multieriod investment roblems in the resence of transaction costs, see for instance Muthuraman and Kumar (2006), Lynch and Tan (2010), and Brown and Smith (2011).
3 DeMiguel, Mei, and Nogales: Multieriod Portfolio Otimization with General Transaction Costs 3 transaction costs and the discount factor, and shrinks with the investment horizon and the riskaversion arameter. Our second contribution is to study analytically the otimal ortfolio olicy in the resence of market imact costs, which arise when the investor makes large trades that distort market rices. 2 Traditionally, researchers have assumed that the market rice imact is linear on the amount traded (see Kyle (1985)), and thus that market imact costs are quadratic. Under this assumtion, Garleanu and Pedersen (2012) derive closedform exressions for the otimal ortfolio olicy within their multieriod setting. However, Torre and Ferrari (1997), Grinold and Kahn (2000), and Almgren et al. (2005) show that the square root function is more aroriate for modeling market rice imact, thus suggesting market imact costs grow at a rate slower than quadratic. Our contribution is to extend the analysis by Garleanu and Pedersen (2012) to a general case where we are able to cature the distortions on market rice through a a ower function with an exonent between one and two. For this general formulation, we show that there exists an analytical rebalancing region for every time eriod, such that the otimal olicy at each eriod is to trade to the boundary of the corresonding rebalancing region. Moreover, we find that the rebalancing regions shrink throughout the investment horizon, which means that, unlike with roortional transaction costs, it is otimal for the investor to trade at every eriod when she faces market imact costs. Finally, our third contribution is to study numerically the utility losses associated with ignoring transaction costs and investing myoically, as well as how these utility losses deend on relevant arameters. We find that the losses associated with either ignoring transaction costs or behaving myoically can be large. Moreover, the losses from ignoring transaction costs increase in the level of transaction costs, and decrease with the investment horizon, whereas the losses from behaving myoically increase with the investment horizon and are concave unimodal on the level of transaction costs. Our work is related to Dybvig (2005), who considers a singleeriod setting with meanvariance utility and roortional transaction costs. For the case with multile risky assets, he shows that the otimal ortfolio olicy is characterized by a notrade region shaed as a arallelogram, but the manuscrit does not rovide a detailed analytical roof. Like Dybvig (2005), we consider roortional transaction costs and meanvariance utility, but we extend the results to a multieriod setting, and show how the results can be rigorously roven analytically. In addition, we consider the case with market imact costs. This manuscrit is organized as follows. Section 2 describes the multieriod framework under general transaction costs. Section 3 studies the case with roortional transaction costs, Section 4 the case with market imact costs, and Section 5 the case with quadratic transaction costs. Section 6 characterizes numer 2 This is articularly relevant for otimal execution, where institutional investors have to execute an investment decision within a fixed time interval; see Bertsimas and Lo (1998) and Engle et al. (2012)
4 4 DeMiguel, Mei, and Nogales: Multieriod Portfolio Otimization with General Transaction Costs ically the utility loss associated with ignoring transaction costs, and with behaving myoically. Section 7 concludes. Aendix A contains the figures, and Aendix B contains the roofs for all results in the aer. 2. General Framework Our framework is closely related to that roosed by Garleanu and Pedersen (2012); herein G&P. Like G&P, we consider a multieriod setting, where the investor tries to maximize her discounted meanvariance utility net of transaction costs by choosing the number of shares to hold of each of the N risky assets. There are three main differences between our model and the model by G&P. First, we consider a more general class of transaction costs that includes not only quadratic transaction costs, but also roortional and market imact costs. Second, we assume rice changes in excess of the riskfree rate are indeendent and identically distributed with mean µ and covariance matrix Σ, while G&P consider the more general case in which these rice changes are redictable. Third, we consider both finite and infinite investment horizons, whereas G&P focus on the infinite horizon case. The investor s decision in our framework can be written as: T where x t IR N max {x t } T t=1 t=1 [ (1 ρ) t (x t µ γ ] 2 x t Σx t ) (1 ρ) t 1 κ Λ 1/ (x t x t 1 ), (1) contains the number of shares of each of the N risky assets held in eriod t, T is the investment horizon, ρ is the discount factor, and γ is the riskaversion arameter. The term κ Λ 1/ (x t x t 1 ) is the transaction cost for the tth eriod, where κ IR is the transaction cost arameter, Λ IR N N is the transaction cost matrix, and s is the norm of vector s; that is, s = N i=1 s i. The transaction cost matrix Λ is a symmetric ositivedefinite matrix that catures the distortions to asset rices originated by the interaction between the multile assets. G&P argue that it can be viewed as a multidimensional version of Kyle s lambda, see Kyle (1985). For small trades, which do not imact market rices, the transaction cost is usually assumed to be roortional to the amount traded ( = 1), and the natural choice for the transaction cost matrix is Λ = I, where I is the identity matrix. For larger trades, which result in market imact costs, the literature suggests that the transaction costs grow as a ower function with an exonent (1, 2]. Moreover, G&P consider the case with quadratic transaction costs ( = 2) and argue that a sensible choice for the transaction cost matrix is Λ = Σ. We consider this case as well as the case with Λ = I to facilitate the comarison with the case with roortional costs. 3 Our analysis relies on the following assumtion. 3 To simlify the exosition, we focus on the case where the transaction costs associated with trading all N risky assets are symmetric. It is straightforward, however, to extend our results to the asymmetry case, where the transaction costs associated with trading the jth asset at the tth eriod is: κ j (Λ 1/ (x t x t 1)) j j.
5 DeMiguel, Mei, and Nogales: Multieriod Portfolio Otimization with General Transaction Costs 5 ASSUMPTION 1. Price changes in excess of the riskfree rate are indeendently and identically distributed with mean vector µ and covariance matrix Σ. 3. Proortional Transaction Costs In this section we consider the case where transaction costs are roortional to the amount traded ( = 1). These socalled roortional transaction costs are aroriate to model the cost associated with trades that are small, and thus the transaction cost originates from the bidask sread and other brokerage commissions. For exosition uroses, we first study the singleeriod case, and show that for this case the otimal ortfolio olicy is analytically characterized by a notrade region shaed as a arallelogram. 4 We then study the general multieriod case, and again show that there is a notrade region shaed as a arallelogram. Moreover, if the starting ortfolio is inside the notrade region, then it is otimal not to trade at any eriod. If, on the other hand, the starting ortfolio is outside the notrade region, then it is otimal to trade to the boundary of the notrade region in the first eriod, and not to trade thereafter. Furthermore, we study how the notrade region deends on the level of roortional transaction costs, the correlation in asset returns, the discount factor, the investment horizon, and the riskaversion arameter The SinglePeriod Case For the singleeriod case, the investor s decision is max x (1 ρ)(x µ γ 2 x Σx) κ x x 0 1, (2) where x 0 is the starting ortfolio. Because the term x x 0 1 is not differentiable, it is not ossible to obtain closedform exressions for the otimal ortfolio olicy for the case with roortional transaction costs. The following roosition, however, demonstrates that the otimal trading olicy is characterized by a notrade region shaed as a arallelogram. PROPOSITION 1. Let Assumtion 1 hold, then: 1. The investor s decision roblem (2) can be equivalently rewritten as: min (x x 0 ) Σ(x x 0 ), (3) x s.t Σ(x x κ ) (1 ρ)γ, (4) where x = Σ 1 µ/γ is the otimal ortfolio in the absence of transaction costs (the Markowitz or target ortfolio), and s = max i { s i } is the infinity norm of s. 4 Our analysis for the singleeriod case with roortional transaction costs is similar to that by Dybvig (2005), but we rovide a detailed analytical roof.
6 6 DeMiguel, Mei, and Nogales: Multieriod Portfolio Otimization with General Transaction Costs 2. Constraint (4) defines a notrade region shaed as a arallelogram centered at the target ortfolio x, such that if the starting ortfolio x 0 is inside this region, then it is otimal not to trade, and if the starting ortfolio is outside this notrade region, then it is otimal to trade to the oint in the boundary of the notrade region that minimizes the objective function in (3). Proosition 1 shows that it is otimal not to trade if the marginal meanvariance utility from trading on any of the N risky assets is smaller than the transaction cost arameter κ. To see this, note that inequality (4), which defines the notrade region, can be equivalently rewritten as (1 ρ)γσ(x x ) κ. (5) Moreover, it is easy to show that the vector (1 ρ)γσ(x x ) gives the marginal meanvariance utility from trading in each of the assets, because it is the gradient (first derivative) of the static meanvariance utility (1 ρ)(x µ γ 2 x Σx) with resect to the ortfolio x. For a twoasset examle, Figure 1 deicts the arallelogramshaed notrade region defined by inequality (4), together with the level sets for the objective function given by (3). The otimal ortfolio olicy is to trade to the intersection between the notrade region and the tangent level set, at which the marginal utility from trading is equal to the transaction cost arameter κ. It is easy to see that the size of notrade region defined by Equation (4) decreases with the risk aversion arameter γ. Intuitively, the more risk averse the investor, the larger her incentives to trade and diversify her ortfolio. Also, it is clear that the size of the notrade region increases with the roortional transaction arameter κ. This makes sense intuitively because the larger the transaction cost arameter, the less attractive to the investor is to trade in order to move closer to the target ortfolio. Moreover, the following roosition shows that there exists a finite transaction cost arameter κ such that if the transaction cost arameter κ > κ, then it is otimal not to trade. PROPOSITION 2. The notrade region is unbounded when κ κ, where κ = φ and φ is the vector of Lagrange multiliers associated with the constraint at the unique maximizer for the following otimization roblem: 3.2. The Multieriod Case max x (1 ρ)(x µ γ 2 x Σx), (6) s.t. x x 0 = 0. (7) In this section, we show that similar to the singleeriod case, the otimal ortfolio olicy for the multieriod case is also characterized by a notrade region shaed as a arallelogram and centered around the target
7 DeMiguel, Mei, and Nogales: Multieriod Portfolio Otimization with General Transaction Costs 7 ortfolio. If the starting ortfolio at the first eriod is inside this notrade region, then it is otimal not to trade at any eriod. If, on the other hand, the starting ortfolio at the first eriod is outside this notrade region, then it is otimal to trade to the boundary of the notrade region in the first eriod, and not to trade thereafter. The investor s decision for this case can be written as: { T max {x t } T t=1 t=1 [(1 ρ) t (x t µ γ 2 x t Σx t ) (1 ρ) t 1 κ x t x t 1 1 ] }. (8) The following theorem demonstrates that the otimal trading olicy is characterized by a notrade region shaed as a arallelogram. THEOREM 1. Let Assumtion 1 hold, then: 1. It is otimal not to trade at any eriod other than the first eriod; that is, x 1 = x 2 = = x T. (9) 2. The investor s otimal ortfolio for the first eriod x 1 (and thus for all subsequent eriods) is the solution to the following constrained otimization roblem: min (x 1 x 0 ) Σ (x 1 x 0 ), (10) x 1 s.t Σ(x 1 x κ ρ ) (1 ρ)γ 1 (1 ρ). (11) T where x 0 is the starting ortfolio, and x = Σ 1 µ/γ is the otimal ortfolio in the absence of transaction costs (the Markowitz or target ortfolio). 3. Constraint (11) defines a notrade region shaed as a arallelogram centered at the target ortfolio x, such that if the starting ortfolio x 0 is inside this region, then it is otimal not to trade at any eriod, and if the starting ortfolio is outside this notrade region, then it is otimal to trade at the first eriod to the oint in the boundary of the notrade region that minimizes the objective function in (10), and not to trade thereafter. Similar to the singleeriod case, Theorem 1 shows that it is otimal to trade only if the marginal discounted multieriod meanvariance utility from trading in one of the assets is larger than the transaction cost arameter κ. To see this, note that inequality (11), which gives the notrade region, can be rewritten as (γ(1 ρ)(1 (1 ρ) T )/ρ)σ(x 1 x ) κ. (12) Moreover, because it is only otimal to trade at the first eriod, the vector inside the infinite norm on the left handside of inequality 12 is the gradient (first derivative) of the discounted multieriod mean variance utility T t=1 (1 ρ)t ( x t µ γ 2 x t Σx t ) with resect to the ortfolio xt.
8 8 DeMiguel, Mei, and Nogales: Multieriod Portfolio Otimization with General Transaction Costs The following corollary establishes how the size of the notrade region for the multieriod case deends on the roblem arameters. COROLLARY 1. The notrade region for the multieriod investor satisfies the following roerties: The notrade region exands as the roortional transaction arameter κ increases. The notrade region exands as the discount factor arameter ρ increases. The notrade region shrinks as the investment horizon T increases. The notrade region shrinks as the riskaversion arameter γ increases. Similar to the singleeriod case, we observe that the size of the notrade region grows with the transaction cost arameter κ. This is intuitive as the larger the transaction costs, the less willing the investor is to trade in order to diversify. This is illustrated in Panel (a) of Figure 2, which deicts the notrade regions for different values of the transaction cost arameter κ for a case with two stocks. In addition, it is easy to show following the same argument used to rove Proosition 2 that there is a κ such that the notrade region is unbounded for κ κ. The size of the notrade region increases with the discount factor ρ. Again, this makes sense intuitively because the larger the discount factor, the less imortant the utility for future eriods and thus the smaller the incentive to trade today. This is illustrated in Figure 2, Panel (b). The size of the notrade region decreases with the investment horizon T. To see this intuitively, note that we have shown that the otimal olicy is to trade at the first eriod and hold this osition thereafter. Then, a multieriod investor with shorter investment horizon will be more concerned about the transaction costs incurred at the first stage, comared with the investor who has a longer investment horizon. Finally, when T, the notrade region shrinks to the arallelogram bounded by κρ/((1 ρ)γ), which is much closer to the center x. Of course, when T = 1, the multieriod roblem reduces to the static case. This is illustrated in Figure 2, Panel (c). In addition, the notrade region shrinks as the risk aversion arameter γ increases. Intuitively, as the investor becomes more risk averse, the otimal olicy is to move closer to the diversified (safe) osition x, desite the transaction costs associated with this. This is illustrated in Figure 2, Panel (d), which also shows that the target ortfolio changes with the riskaversion arameter, and therefore the notrade regions are centered at different oints for different riskaversion arameters. The notrade region also deends on the correlation between assets. Figure 2, Panel (e) shows the notrade regions for different correlations. When two assets are ositively correlated, the arallelogram leans to the left, because the advantages from diversification are small, whereas with negative correlation it leans to the right. In the absence of correlations the notrade region becomes a rectangle.
9 DeMiguel, Mei, and Nogales: Multieriod Portfolio Otimization with General Transaction Costs 9 4. Market Imact Costs In this section we consider market imact costs, which arise when the investor makes large trades that distort market rices. Traditionally, researchers have assumed that the market rice imact is linear on the amount traded (see Kyle (1985)), and thus that market imact costs are quadratic. Under this assumtion, Garleanu and Pedersen (2012) derive closedform exressions for the otimal ortfolio olicy within their multieriod setting. However, Torre and Ferrari (1997), Grinold and Kahn (2000), Almgren et al. (2005), and Gatheral (2010) show that the square root function may be more aroriate for modelling market rice imact, thus suggesting market imact costs grow at a rate slower than quadratic. Therefore in this section we consider a general case, where the transaction costs are given by the norm with (1, 2), and where we cature the distortions on market rice through the transaction cost matrix Λ. For exosition uroses, we first study the singleeriod case The SinglePeriod Case For the singleeriod case, the investor s decision is: max x (1 ρ)(x µ γ 2 x Σx) κ Λ 1/ (x x 0 ), (13) where 1 < < 2. Problem (13) can be solved numerically, but unfortunately it is not ossible to obtain closedform exressions for the otimal ortfolio olicy. The following roosition, however, shows that the otimal ortfolio olicy is to trade to the boundary of a rebalancing region that deends on the starting ortfolio and contains the target or Markowitz ortfolio. PROPOSITION 3. Let Assumtion 1 hold, then if the starting ortfolio x 0 is equal to the target or Markowitz ortfolio x, the otimal olicy is not to trade. Otherwise, it is otimal to trade to the boundary of the following rebalancing region: where q is such that q = 1. Λ 1/ Σ(x x ) q κ Λ 1/ (x x 0 ) 1 (1 ρ)γ, (14) Comaring Proositions 1 and 3, we identify three main differences between the cases with roortional and market imact costs. First, for the case with market imact costs it is always otimal to trade (excet in the trivial case where the starting ortfolio coincides with the target or Markowitz ortfolio), whereas for the case with roortional transaction costs it may be otimal not to trade if the starting ortfolio is inside the notrade region. Second, the rebalancing region deends on the starting ortfolio x 0, whereas the notrade region is indeendent of it. Third, the rebalancing region contains the target or Markowitz ortfolio, but it is not centered around it, whereas the notrade region is centered around the Markowitz ortfolio.
10 10 DeMiguel, Mei, and Nogales: Multieriod Portfolio Otimization with General Transaction Costs Note that, as in the case with roortional transaction costs, the size of the rebalancing region increases with the transaction cost arameter κ, and decreases with the riskaversion arameter. Intuitively, the more risk averse the investor, the larger her incentives to trade and diversify her ortfolio. Also, the rebalancing region grows with κ because the larger the transaction cost arameter, the less attractive to the investor is to trade to move closer to the target ortfolio. The following corollary gives the rebalancing region for two imortant articular cases. First, the case where the transaction cost matrix Λ = I, which is a realistic assumtion when the amount traded is small, and thus the interaction between different assets, in terms of market imact, is small. This case also facilitates the comarison with the otimal ortfolio olicy for the case with roortional transaction costs. The second case corresonds to the transaction cost matrix Λ = Σ, in analogy with the analysis by G&P in the context of quadratic transaction costs. COROLLARY 2. For the singleeriod investor defined in (13): 1. When the transaction cost matrix is Λ = I, then the rebalancing region is Σ(x x ) q κ x x 0 1 (1 ρ)γ. (15) 2. When the transaction cost matrix is Λ = Σ, then the rebalancing region is Σ 1/q (x x ) q κ Σ 1/ (x x 0 ) 1 (1 ρ)γ. (16) Note that, in both articular cases, the Markowitz strategy x is contained in the rebalancing region. To gain intuition about the form of the rebalancing regions characterized in (15) and (16), Panel (a) in Figure 3 deicts the rebalancing region and the otimal ortfolio olicy for a twoasset examle when Λ = I, while Panel (b) deicts the corresonding rebalancing region and otimal ortfolio olicy when Λ = Σ. The figure shows that, in both cases, the rebalancing region is a convex region containing the Markowitz ortfolio. Moreover, it shows how the otimal trading strategy moves to the boundary of the rebalancing region The Multieriod Case The investor s decision for this case can be written as: max {x t } T t=1 T t=1 [(1 ρ) (x t t µ γ ) ] 2 x t Σx t (1 ρ) t 1 κ Λ 1/ (x t x t 1 ). (17) As in the singleeriod case, it is not ossible to rovide closedform exressions for the otimal ortfolio olicy, but the following theorem illustrates the analytical roerties of the otimal ortfolio olicy. THEOREM 2. Let Assumtion 1 hold, then:
11 DeMiguel, Mei, and Nogales: Multieriod Portfolio Otimization with General Transaction Costs If the starting ortfolio x 0 is equal to the target or Markowitz ortfolio x, then the otimal olicy is not to trade at any eriod. 2. Otherwise it is otimal to trade at every eriod. Moreover, at the tth eriod it is otimal to trade to the boundary of the following rebalancing region: where q is such that q = 1. T (1 s=t ρ)s t Λ 1/ Σ(x s x ) q κ Λ 1/ (x t x t 1 ) 1 (1 ρ)γ, (18) Theorem 2 shows that for the multieriod case with market imact costs it is otimal to trade at every eriod (excet in the trivial case where the starting ortfolio coincides with the Markowitz ortfolio). Moreover, at every eriod it is otimal to trade to the boundary of a rebalancing region that deends not only on the starting ortfolio, but also on the ortfolio for every subsequent eriod. Finally, note that the size of the rebalancing region for eriod t, assuming the ortfolios for the rest of the eriods are fixed, increases with the transaction cost arameter κ and decreases with the discount factor ρ and the riskaversion arameter γ. The following roosition shows that the rebalancing region for eriod t contains the rebalancing region for every subsequent eriod. Moreover, the rebalancing region converges to the Markowitz ortfolio as the investment horizon grows, and thus the otimal ortfolio x T converges to the target ortfolio x in the limit when T goes to infinity. PROPOSITION 4. Let Assumtion 1 hold, then: 1. The rebalancing region for the tth eriod contains the rebalancing region for every subsequent eriod, 2. Every rebalancing region contains the Markowitz ortfolio, 3. The rebalancing region converges to the Markowitz ortfolio in the limit when the investment horizon goes to infinity. The next corollary gives the rebalancing region for the two articular cases of transaction cost matrix we consider. COROLLARY 3. For the multieriod investor defined in (17): 1. When the transaction cost matrix is Λ = I, then the rebalancing region is T (1 s=t ρ)s t Σ(x s x ) q κ x t x t 1 1 (1 ρ)γ. (19) 2. When the transaction cost matrix is λ = Σ, then the rebalancing region is T (1 s=t ρ)s t Σ 1/q (x s x ) q κ Σ 1/ (x t x t 1 ) 1 (1 ρ)γ. (20)
12 12 DeMiguel, Mei, and Nogales: Multieriod Portfolio Otimization with General Transaction Costs To gain intuition about the shae of the rebalancing regions characterized in (19) and (20), Panel (a) in Figure 4 shows the otimal ortfolio olicy and the rebalancing regions for a twoasset examle with an investment horizon T = 3 when Λ = I, whereas Panel (b) deicts the corresonding otimal ortfolio olicy and rebalancing regions when Λ = Σ. The figure shows, in both cases, how the rebalancing region for each eriod contains the rebalancing region for subsequent eriods. Moreover, every rebalancing region contains, but is not centered at, the Markowitz ortfolio x. In articular, for each stage, any trade is to the boundary of the rebalancing region and the rebalancing is towards the Markowitz strategy x. Note also that the figure shows that, for the case with Λ = I, it is otimal for the investor to buy the second asset in the first eriod, and then sell it in the second eriod. This may aear subotimal from the oint of view of market imact costs, but it turns out to be otimal when the investor considers the trade off between multieriod meanvariance utility and market imact costs. Finally, we study numerically the imact of the market imact cost growth rate on the otimal ortfolio olicy. Figure 5 shows the rebalancing regions and trading trajectories for investors with different transaction growth rates = 1, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2. When the transaction cost matrix Λ = I, Panel (a) shows how the rebalancing region deends on. In articular, for = 1 we recover the case with roortional transaction costs, and hence the rebalancing region becomes a arallelogramshaed notrade region. For = 2, the rebalancing region becomes an ellise. And for values of between 1 and 2, the rebalancing regions become suerellises but not centered at the target ortfolio x. On the other hand, Panel (b) in Figure 5 shows how the trading trajectories deend on for a articular investment horizon of T = 10 days. We observe that, as grows, the trading trajectories become less curved and the investor converges towards the target ortfolio at a slower rate. We have also considered the case Λ = Σ, but the insights are similar and thus we do not include the figure. 5. Quadratic Transaction Costs We now consider the case with quadratic transaction costs. The investor s decision is: max {x t } T t=1 T t=1 [ (1 ρ) t (x t µ γ ] 2 x t Σx t ) (1 ρ) t 1 κ Λ 1/2 (x t x t 1 ) 2 2. (21) As exlained in Section 2, our general framework differs from that considered by G&P in three resects: (i) G&P assume rice changes are redictable, whereas we assume rice changes are iid, (ii) G&P consider an infinite horizon, whereas we allow for a finite investment horizon, and (iii) we consider a general transaction costs matrix Λ whereas G&P focus on the articular case Λ = Σ. The next theorem rovides an extension of the results in G&P to obtain an exlicit characterization of the otimal ortfolio olicy.
13 DeMiguel, Mei, and Nogales: Multieriod Portfolio Otimization with General Transaction Costs 13 THEOREM 3. Let Assumtion 1 hold, then: 1. The otimal ortfolio x t, x t+1,..., x t+t 1 satisfies the following equations: x t = A 1 x + A 2 x t 1 + A 3 x t+1, for t = 1, 2,..., T 1 (22) x t = B 1 x + B 2 x t 1, for t = T. (23) where A 1 = (1 ρ)γ [(1 ρ)γσ + 2κΛ + 2(1 ρ)κλ] 1 Σ, A 2 = 2κ [(1 ρ)γσ + 2κΛ + 2(1 ρ)κλ] 1 Λ, A 3 = 2(1 ρ)κ [(1 ρ)γσ + 2κΛ + 2(1 ρ)κλ] 1 Λ, with A 1 + A 2 + A 3 = I, and B 1 = (1 ρ)γ[(1 ρ)γσ + 2κΛ] 1 Σ, B 2 = 2κ[(1 ρ)γσ + 2κΛ] 1 Λ, with B 1 + B 2 = I. 2. The otimal ortfolio converges to the Markowitz ortfolio as the investment horizon T goes to infinity. Theorem 3 shows that the otimal ortfolio for each stage is a combination of the Markowitz strategy (the target ortfolio), the revious eriod ortfolio, and the next eriod ortfolio. The next corollary shows the secific otimal ortfolios for two articular cases of transaction cost matrix. Like G&P, we consider the case where the transaction costs matrix is roortional to the covariance matrix, that is Λ = Σ. In addition, we also consider the case where the transaction costs matrix is roortional to the identity matrix; that is Λ = I. COROLLARY 4. For a multieriod investor with objective function (21): 1. When the transaction cost matrix is Λ = I, then the otimal trading strategy satisfies x t = A 1 x + A 2 x t 1 + A 3 x t+1, for t = 1, 2,..., T 1 (24) x t = B 1 x + B 2 x t 1, for t = T (25) where A 1 = (1 ρ)γ [(1 ρ)γσ + 2κI + 2(1 ρ)κi] 1 Σ, A 2 = 2κ [(1 ρ)γσ + 2κI + 2(1 ρ)κi] 1, A 3 = 2(1 ρ)κ [(1 ρ)γσ + 2κI + 2(1 ρ)κi] 1,
14 14 DeMiguel, Mei, and Nogales: Multieriod Portfolio Otimization with General Transaction Costs with A 1 + A 2 + A 3 = I, and B 1 = (1 ρ)γ[(1 ρ)γσ + 2κI] 1 Σ, B 2 = 2κ[(1 ρ)γσ + 2κI] 1. with B 1 + B 2 = I. 2. When the transaction cost matrix is Λ = Σ, then the otimal trading strategy satisfies x t = α 1 x + α 2 x t 1 + α 3 x t+1, for t = 1, 2,..., T 1 (26) x t = β 1 x + β 2 x t 1, for t = T. (27) where α 1 = (1 ρ)γ/((1 ρ)γ + 2κ + 2(1 ρ)κ), α 2 = 2κ/((1 ρ)γ + 2κ + 2(1 ρ)κ), α 3 = 2(1 ρ)κ/((1 ρ)γ + 2κ + 2(1 ρ)κ) with α 1 + α 2 + α 3 = 1, and β 1 = (1 ρ)γ/((1 ρ)γ + 2κ) β 2 = 2κ/((1 ρ)γ + 2κ) with β 1 + β 2 = When the transaction cost matrix is Λ = Σ, then the otimal ortfolios for eriods t = 1, 2,..., T lay on a straight line. Corollary 4 shows that, when Λ = Σ, the solution becomes simler and easier to interret than when Λ = I. Note that when Λ = Σ, matrices A and B in Theorem 3 become scalars α and β, resectively, and hence the otimal ortfolio at eriod t can be exressed as a linear combination of the Markowitz ortfolio, the revious eriod ortfolio and the next eriod ortfolio. For this reason, it is intuitive to observe that the otimal trading strategies for all the eriods must lay on a straight line. To conclude this section, Figure 6 rovides a comarison of the otimal ortfolio olicy for the case with quadratic transaction costs (when Λ = Σ), with those for the cases with roortional and market imact costs (when Λ = I), for a multieriod investor with T = 4. We have also considered other transaction cost matrices, but the insights are similar. The figure confirms that, for the case with quadratic transaction costs, the otimal ortfolio olicy is to trade at every eriod along a straight line that converges to the Markowitz ortfolio. It can also be areciated that the investor trades more aggressively at the first eriods comared to the final eriods. For the case with roortional transaction costs, it is otimal to trade to the boundary of the notrade region shaed as a arallelogram in the first eriod and not to trade thereafter. Finally, for the case with market imact costs, the investor trades at every eriod to the boundary of the corresonding rebalancing region. The resulting trajectory is not a straight line. In fact, as in the examle discussed in Section 4, it is otimal for the investor to buy the second asset in the first eriod and then sell it in the second eriod; that is, the otimal ortfolio olicy is inefficient in terms of market imact costs, but it is otimal in terms of the tradeoff between market imact costs and discounted utility.
15 DeMiguel, Mei, and Nogales: Multieriod Portfolio Otimization with General Transaction Costs Numerical Analysis In this section, we study numerically the utility loss associated with ignoring transaction costs and investing myoically, as well as how these utility losses deend on the transaction cost arameter, the ricechange correlation, the investment horizon, and the riskaversion arameter. We first consider the case with roortional transaction costs, and then study how the monotonicity roerties of the utility losses change when transaction costs are quadratic. We have also considered the case with market imact costs ( = 1.5), but the insights are similar to those from the case with quadratic transaction costs and thus we do not reort the results to conserve sace. For each tye of transaction cost (roortional or quadratic), we consider three different ortfolio olicies. First, we consider the target ortfolio olicy, which consists of trading to the target or Markowitz ortfolio in the first eriod and not trading thereafter. This is the otimal ortfolio olicy for an investor in the absence of transaction costs. Second, the static ortfolio olicy, which consists of trading at each eriod to the solution to the singleeriod roblem subject to transaction costs. This is the otimal ortfolio olicy for a myoic investor who takes into account transaction costs. Third, we consider the multieriod ortfolio olicy, which is the otimal ortfolio olicy for a multieriod investor who takes into account transaction costs. Finally, we evaluate the utility of each of the three ortfolio olicies using the aroriate multieriod framework; that is, when considering roortional transaction costs, we evaluate the investor s utility from each ortfolio with the objective function in equation (8); and when considering quadratic transaction costs, we evaluate the investor s utility using the objective function (21) Proortional Transaction Costs Base Case. We consider a base case with roortional transaction costs of 30 basis oints, riskaversion arameter γ = 10 5, which corresonds to a relative risk aversion of one for an investor managing M = 10 5 dollars, annual discount factor ρ = 5% 5, and an investment horizon of T = 22 days (one month). We consider four risky assets (N = 4), with starting rice of one dollar, asset rice change correlations of 0.2, and we assume the starting ortfolio is equallyweighted across the four risky assets with a total number of M = 10 5 shares. We randomly draw the annual average rice changes from a uniform distribution with suort [0.1, 0.25], and the annual rice change volatilities from a uniform distribution with suort [0.1, 0.4]. 5 Garleanu and Pedersen (2012) consider, for a larger investor facing quadratic transaction costs, an absolute risk aversion γ = 10 9, which corresonds to an investor managing M = 10 9 dollars, and a discount factor ρ = 1 ex( 0.02/260) which corresonds with an annual discount of 2%.
16 16 DeMiguel, Mei, and Nogales: Multieriod Portfolio Otimization with General Transaction Costs For our base case, we observe that the utility loss associated with investing myoically (that is, the difference between the utility of the multieriod ortfolio olicy and the static ortfolio olicy) is 70.01%. The utility loss associated with ignoring transaction costs altogether (that is, the difference between the utility of the multieriod ortfolio olicy and the target ortfolio olicy) is 13.90%. Hence we find that the loss associated with either ignoring transaction costs or behaving myoically can be substantial. The following subsection confirms this is also true when we change relevant model arameters Comarative statics. We study numerically how the utility losses associated with ignoring transaction costs (i.e., with the static ortfolio), and investing myoically (i.e., with the target ortfolio) deend on the transaction cost arameter, the ricechange correlation, the investment horizon, and the riskaversion arameter. Panel (a) in Figure 7 deicts the utility loss associated with the target and static ortfolios for values of the roortional transaction cost arameter κ ranging from 0 basis oint to 120 basis oints. As exected, the utility loss associated with ignoring transaction costs is zero in the absence of transaction costs and increases monotonically with transaction costs. Moreover, for large transaction costs arameters, the utility loss associated with ignoring transaction costs grows linearly with κ and can be very large. The utility losses associated with behaving myoically are concave unimodal in the transaction cost arameter, being zero for the case with zero transaction costs (because both the singleeriod and multieriod ortfolio olicies coincide with the target or Markowitz ortfolio), and for the case with large transaction costs (because both the singleeriod and multieriod ortfolio olicies result in little or no trading). The utility loss of behaving myoically reaches a maximum of 80% for a level of transaction costs of around 5 basis oints Panel (b) in Figure 7 deicts the utility loss associated with the target and static ortfolio olicies for values of rice change correlation ranging from 0.3 to 0.4. The grah shows that while the utility loss associated with the static ortfolio is monotonically decreasing in correlation, the utility loss of the target ortfolio increases with the correlation. The exlanation for this stems from the fact that the static ortfolio is less diversified than the multieriod ortfolio (because it assigns a higher weight to transaction costs), whereas the target ortfolio is more diversified than the multieriod ortfolio (because it ignores transaction costs). Hence, because the benefits from diversification are greater for smaller correlations, the utility loss from the static ortfolio decreases with correlation, and the utility loss of the target ortfolio increases for large correlations. Panel (c) in Figure 7 deicts the utility loss associated with investing myoically and ignoring transaction costs for investment horizons ranging from T = 5 (one week) to T = 22 (one month). Not surrisingly, the utility loss associated with behaving myoically grows with the investment horizon. Also, the utility
17 DeMiguel, Mei, and Nogales: Multieriod Portfolio Otimization with General Transaction Costs 17 loss associated with ignoring transaction costs is very large for shortterm investors, and decreases monotonically with the investment horizon. The reason for this is that the size of the notrade region for the multieriod ortfolio olicy decreases monotonically with the investment horizon, and thus the target and multieriod olicies become similar for long investment horizons. This makes sense intuitively: by adoting the Markowitz ortfolio, a multieriod investor incurs transaction cost losses at the first eriod, but makes meanvariance utility gains for the rest of the investment horizon. Hence, when the investment horizon is long, the transaction losses are negligible comared with the utility gains. Finally, we find that the utility losses associated with investing myoically and ignoring transaction costs do not deend on the riskaversion arameter, because the utility for these three ortfolio olicies decrease at the same relative rate as γ increases Quadratic Transaction Costs In this section we study whether and how the resence of quadratic transaction costs (as oosed to roortional transaction costs) affects the utility losses of the static and target ortfolios The Base Case. We consider the same arameters as in the base case with roortional transaction costs, lus we assume the transaction cost matrix Λ = Σ, and the transaction cost arameter κ = Similar to the case with roortional transaction costs, we find that the losses associated with either ignoring transaction costs or behaving myoically are substantial. For instance, for the base case with find that the utility loss associated with investing myoically is 30.81%, whereas the utility loss associated with ignoring transaction costs is %. Moreover, we find that the utility losses associated with the target ortfolio are relatively larger, comared to those of the static ortfolio, for the case with quadratic transaction costs. The exlanation for this is that the target ortfolio requires large trades in the first eriod, which are enalized heavily in the context of quadratic transaction costs. The static ortfolio, on the other hand, results in smaller trades over successive eriods and this will result in overall smaller quadratic transaction costs Comarative Statics. Panel (a) in Figure 8 deicts the utility loss associated with investing myoically and ignoring transaction costs for values of the quadratic transaction cost arameter κ ranging from to Our findings are very similar to those for the case with roortional transaction costs. Not surrisingly, the utility losses associated with ignoring transaction costs are small for small transaction costs and grow monotonically as the transaction cost arameter grows. Also, the utility loss associated with the static ortfolio olicy is concave unimodal in the level of transaction costs. The intuition behind these results is similar to that rovided for the case with roortional transaction costs.
18 18 DeMiguel, Mei, and Nogales: Multieriod Portfolio Otimization with General Transaction Costs Panel (b) in Figure 8 deicts the utility loss associated with investing myoically and ignoring transaction costs for values of rice change correlation ranging from 0.3 to 0.4. Similar to the case with roortional transaction costs, the utility loss associated with the static ortfolio is monotonically decreasing with correlation. The reason for this is again that the static ortfolio is less diversified than the multieriod ortfolio, and this results in larger losses when correlations are small because the otential gains from diversification are larger. Unlike in the case with roortional transaction costs, however, the utility loss of the target ortfolio is monotonically decreasing with correlation. This is surrising as the target ortfolio is more diversified than the multieriod ortfolio and thus its losses should be relatively smaller when correlations are low. We find, however, that because the target ortfolio requires large trades in the first eriod and thus it incurs very high quadratic transaction costs, the benefits of diversification are swamed by the quadratic transaction costs. Consequently, the utility loss of the target ortfolio is larger for small (negative) correlations, because in this case the target ortfolio takes extreme long and short ositions that result in very large trades in the first eriod, and thus very large quadratic transaction costs. Panel (c) in Figure 8 deicts the utility loss associated with investing myoically and ignoring transaction costs for values investment horizon T ranging from 5 days to 22 days. Our findings are similar to those for the case with roortional transaction costs. The target ortfolio losses are monotonically decreasing with the investment horizon as these two ortfolios become more similar for longer investment horizons, where the overall imortance of transaction costs is smaller. The static ortfolio losses are monotonically increasing with the investment horizon because the larger the investment horizon the faster the multieriod ortfolio converges to the target, whereas the rate at which the static ortfolio converges to the target does not change with the investment horizon. Finally, we find that the utility loss associated with investing myoically and ignoring transaction costs is monotonically decreasing for values of the riskaversion level γ ranging from to The exlanation for this is that when the riskaversion arameter is large, the meanvariance utility is relatively more imortant comared to the quadratic transaction costs, and thus the target and static ortfolios are more similar to the multieriod ortfolio. This is in contrast to the case with roortional transaction costs, where the losses did not deend on the riskaversion arameter. The reason for this difference is that with quadratic transaction costs, the meanvariance utility term and the transaction cost term are both quadratic, and thus the riskaversion arameter does have an imact on the overall utility loss. Finally, we have reeated our analysis for a case with market imact costs ( = 1.5) and we find that the monotonicity roerties of the utility losses are roughly in the middle of those for the case with roortional transaction costs ( = 1) and quadratic transaction costs ( = 2), and thus we do not reort the results to conserve sace.
19 DeMiguel, Mei, and Nogales: Multieriod Portfolio Otimization with General Transaction Costs Conclusions We study the otimal ortfolio olicy for a multieriod meanvariance investor facing multile risky assets subject to roortional, market imact, or quadratic transaction costs. We demonstrate analytically that, in the resence of roortional transaction costs, the otimal strategy for the multieriod investor is to trade in the first eriod to the boundary of a notrade region shaed as a arallelogram, and not to trade thereafter. For the case with market imact costs, the otimal ortfolio olicy is to trade to the boundary of a statedeendent rebalancing region. In addition, the rebalancing region converges to the Markowitz ortfolio as the investment horizon grows large. We contribute to the literature by characterizing the notrade region for a multieriod investor facing roortional transaction costs, and studying the analytical roerties of the otimal trading strategy for the model with market imact costs. Finally, we also show numerically that the utility losses associated with ignoring transaction costs or investing myoically may be large, and study how they deend on the relevant arameters. Acknowledgement We thank comments from seminar articiants at Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Mei and Nogales gratefully acknowledge financial suort from the Sanish government through roject MTM
20 20 DeMiguel, Mei, and Nogales: Multieriod Portfolio Otimization with General Transaction Costs Aendix A: Figures Figure 1 Notrade region and level sets. This figure lots the notrade region and the level sets for a singleeriod investor facing roortional transaction costs with κ = 0.005, discount factor ρ = 0.5, riskaversion arameter γ = 10, ricechange mean µ = [0.02; 0.01], ricechange volatilities [0.02; 0.01] and ricechange correlation 0.2.
A Simple Model of Pricing, Markups and Market. Power Under Demand Fluctuations
A Simle Model of Pricing, Markus and Market Power Under Demand Fluctuations Stanley S. Reynolds Deartment of Economics; University of Arizona; Tucson, AZ 85721 Bart J. Wilson Economic Science Laboratory;
More informationAn Introduction to Risk Parity Hossein Kazemi
An Introduction to Risk Parity Hossein Kazemi In the aftermath of the financial crisis, investors and asset allocators have started the usual ritual of rethinking the way they aroached asset allocation
More informationRisk and Return. Sample chapter. e r t u i o p a s d f CHAPTER CONTENTS LEARNING OBJECTIVES. Chapter 7
Chater 7 Risk and Return LEARNING OBJECTIVES After studying this chater you should be able to: e r t u i o a s d f understand how return and risk are defined and measured understand the concet of risk
More informationAn important observation in supply chain management, known as the bullwhip effect,
Quantifying the Bullwhi Effect in a Simle Suly Chain: The Imact of Forecasting, Lead Times, and Information Frank Chen Zvi Drezner Jennifer K. Ryan David SimchiLevi Decision Sciences Deartment, National
More informationPiracy and Network Externality An Analysis for the Monopolized Software Industry
Piracy and Network Externality An Analysis for the Monoolized Software Industry Ming Chung Chang Deartment of Economics and Graduate Institute of Industrial Economics mcchang@mgt.ncu.edu.tw Chiu Fen Lin
More information1 Portfolio mean and variance
Copyright c 2005 by Karl Sigman Portfolio mean and variance Here we study the performance of a oneperiod investment X 0 > 0 (dollars) shared among several different assets. Our criterion for measuring
More informationRisk in Revenue Management and Dynamic Pricing
OPERATIONS RESEARCH Vol. 56, No. 2, March Aril 2008,. 326 343 issn 0030364X eissn 15265463 08 5602 0326 informs doi 10.1287/ore.1070.0438 2008 INFORMS Risk in Revenue Management and Dynamic Pricing Yuri
More informationA MOST PROBABLE POINTBASED METHOD FOR RELIABILITY ANALYSIS, SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OPTIMIZATION
9 th ASCE Secialty Conference on Probabilistic Mechanics and Structural Reliability PMC2004 Abstract A MOST PROBABLE POINTBASED METHOD FOR RELIABILITY ANALYSIS, SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OPTIMIZATION
More informationManaging specific risk in property portfolios
Managing secific risk in roerty ortfolios Andrew Baum, PhD University of Reading, UK Peter Struemell OPC, London, UK Contact author: Andrew Baum Deartment of Real Estate and Planning University of Reading
More informationJoint Production and Financing Decisions: Modeling and Analysis
Joint Production and Financing Decisions: Modeling and Analysis Xiaodong Xu John R. Birge Deartment of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208,
More informationDAYAHEAD ELECTRICITY PRICE FORECASTING BASED ON TIME SERIES MODELS: A COMPARISON
DAYAHEAD ELECTRICITY PRICE FORECASTING BASED ON TIME SERIES MODELS: A COMPARISON Rosario Esínola, Javier Contreras, Francisco J. Nogales and Antonio J. Conejo E.T.S. de Ingenieros Industriales, Universidad
More informationOn Software Piracy when Piracy is Costly
Deartment of Economics Working aer No. 0309 htt://nt.fas.nus.edu.sg/ecs/ub/w/w0309.df n Software iracy when iracy is Costly Sougata oddar August 003 Abstract: The ervasiveness of the illegal coying of
More information1 Gambler s Ruin Problem
Coyright c 2009 by Karl Sigman 1 Gambler s Ruin Problem Let N 2 be an integer and let 1 i N 1. Consider a gambler who starts with an initial fortune of $i and then on each successive gamble either wins
More informationTHE WELFARE IMPLICATIONS OF COSTLY MONITORING IN THE CREDIT MARKET: A NOTE
The Economic Journal, 110 (Aril ), 576±580.. Published by Blackwell Publishers, 108 Cowley Road, Oxford OX4 1JF, UK and 50 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148, USA. THE WELFARE IMPLICATIONS OF COSTLY MONITORING
More informationLoglikelihood and Confidence Intervals
Stat 504, Lecture 3 Stat 504, Lecture 3 2 Review (contd.): Loglikelihood and Confidence Intervals The likelihood of the samle is the joint PDF (or PMF) L(θ) = f(x,.., x n; θ) = ny f(x i; θ) i= Review:
More informationStochastic Derivation of an Integral Equation for Probability Generating Functions
Journal of Informatics and Mathematical Sciences Volume 5 (2013), Number 3,. 157 163 RGN Publications htt://www.rgnublications.com Stochastic Derivation of an Integral Equation for Probability Generating
More informationInterbank Market and Central Bank Policy
Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reorts Interbank Market and Central Bank Policy JungHyun Ahn Vincent Bignon Régis Breton Antoine Martin Staff Reort No. 763 January 206 This aer resents reliminary
More informationwhere a, b, c, and d are constants with a 0, and x is measured in radians. (π radians =
Introduction to Modeling 3.61 3.6 Sine and Cosine Functions The general form of a sine or cosine function is given by: f (x) = asin (bx + c) + d and f(x) = acos(bx + c) + d where a, b, c, and d are constants
More informationThe Economics of the Cloud: Price Competition and Congestion
Submitted to Oerations Research manuscrit The Economics of the Cloud: Price Cometition and Congestion Jonatha Anselmi Basque Center for Alied Mathematics, jonatha.anselmi@gmail.com Danilo Ardagna Di. di
More informationF inding the optimal, or valuemaximizing, capital
Estimating RiskAdjusted Costs of Financial Distress by Heitor Almeida, University of Illinois at UrbanaChamaign, and Thomas Philion, New York University 1 F inding the otimal, or valuemaximizing, caital
More information6.042/18.062J Mathematics for Computer Science December 12, 2006 Tom Leighton and Ronitt Rubinfeld. Random Walks
6.042/8.062J Mathematics for Comuter Science December 2, 2006 Tom Leighton and Ronitt Rubinfeld Lecture Notes Random Walks Gambler s Ruin Today we re going to talk about onedimensional random walks. In
More informationThe Economics of the Cloud: Price Competition and Congestion
Submitted to Oerations Research manuscrit (Please, rovide the manuscrit number!) Authors are encouraged to submit new aers to INFORMS journals by means of a style file temlate, which includes the journal
More informationAsymmetric Information, Transaction Cost, and. Externalities in Competitive Insurance Markets *
Asymmetric Information, Transaction Cost, and Externalities in Cometitive Insurance Markets * Jerry W. iu Deartment of Finance, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 465565646 wliu@nd.edu Mark J. Browne
More informationComputing the optimal portfolio policy of an investor facing capital gains tax is a challenging problem:
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE Vol. 1, No., February, pp. 77 9 issn 199 eissn 11 1 77 informs doi 1.187/mnsc.1.1 INFORMS Portfolio Investment with the Exact Tax Basis via Nonlinear Programming Victor DeMiguel London
More informationChE 120B Lumped Parameter Models for Heat Transfer and the Blot Number
ChE 0B Lumed Parameter Models for Heat Transfer and the Blot Number Imagine a slab that has one dimension, of thickness d, that is much smaller than the other two dimensions; we also assume that the slab
More informationExercise Sheet 4. X r p
Exercise Sheet 4 Exercise The table rovides data on the return and standard deviation for di erent comositions of a twoasset ortfolio. Plot the data to obtain the ortfolio frontier. Where is the minimum
More informationSimulation and Verification of Coupled Heat and Moisture Modeling
Simulation and Verification of Couled Heat and Moisture Modeling N. Williams Portal 1, M.A.P. van Aarle 2 and A.W.M. van Schijndel *,3 1 Deartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Chalmers University
More informationLarge firms and heterogeneity: the structure of trade and industry under oligopoly
Large firms and heterogeneity: the structure of trade and industry under oligooly Eddy Bekkers University of Linz Joseh Francois University of Linz & CEPR (London) ABSTRACT: We develo a model of trade
More informationConfidence Intervals for CaptureRecapture Data With Matching
Confidence Intervals for CatureRecature Data With Matching Executive summary Caturerecature data is often used to estimate oulations The classical alication for animal oulations is to take two samles
More informationAn Analysis of Reliable Classifiers through ROC Isometrics
An Analysis of Reliable Classifiers through ROC Isometrics Stijn Vanderlooy s.vanderlooy@cs.unimaas.nl Ida G. SrinkhuizenKuyer kuyer@cs.unimaas.nl Evgueni N. Smirnov smirnov@cs.unimaas.nl MICCIKAT, Universiteit
More informationCompensating Fund Managers for RiskAdjusted Performance
Comensating Fund Managers for RiskAdjusted Performance Thomas S. Coleman Æquilibrium Investments, Ltd. Laurence B. Siegel The Ford Foundation Journal of Alternative Investments Winter 1999 In contrast
More informationFin 3710 Investment Analysis Professor Rui Yao CHAPTER 6: EFFICIENT DIVERSIFICATION
HW 4 Fin 3710 Investment Analysis Professor Rui Yao CHAPTER 6: EFFICIENT DIVERIFICATION 1. E(r P ) = (0.5 15) + (0.4 10) + (0.10 6) = 1.1% 3. a. The mean return should be equal to the value comuted in
More informationTheoretical comparisons of average normalized gain calculations
PHYSICS EDUCATIO RESEARCH All submissions to PERS should be sent referably electronically to the Editorial Office of AJP, and then they will be forwarded to the PERS editor for consideration. Theoretical
More informationJena Research Papers in Business and Economics
Jena Research Paers in Business and Economics A newsvendor model with service and loss constraints Werner Jammernegg und Peter Kischka 21/2008 Jenaer Schriften zur Wirtschaftswissenschaft Working and Discussion
More informationTworesource stochastic capacity planning employing a Bayesian methodology
Journal of the Oerational Research Society (23) 54, 1198 128 r 23 Oerational Research Society Ltd. All rights reserved. 165682/3 $25. www.algravejournals.com/jors Tworesource stochastic caacity lanning
More informationMonitoring Frequency of Change By Li Qin
Monitoring Frequency of Change By Li Qin Abstract Control charts are widely used in rocess monitoring roblems. This aer gives a brief review of control charts for monitoring a roortion and some initial
More informationRobust portfolio choice with CVaR and VaR under distribution and mean return ambiguity
TOP DOI 10.1007/s117500130303y ORIGINAL PAPER Robust ortfolio choice with CVaR and VaR under distribution and mean return ambiguity A. Burak Paç Mustafa Ç. Pınar Received: 8 July 013 / Acceted: 16 October
More informationPOISSON PROCESSES. Chapter 2. 2.1 Introduction. 2.1.1 Arrival processes
Chater 2 POISSON PROCESSES 2.1 Introduction A Poisson rocess is a simle and widely used stochastic rocess for modeling the times at which arrivals enter a system. It is in many ways the continuoustime
More informationComputational Finance The Martingale Measure and Pricing of Derivatives
1 The Martingale Measure 1 Comutational Finance The Martingale Measure and Pricing of Derivatives 1 The Martingale Measure The Martingale measure or the Risk Neutral robabilities are a fundamental concet
More informationPortfolio Optimization Part 1 Unconstrained Portfolios
Portfolio Optimization Part 1 Unconstrained Portfolios John Norstad jnorstad@northwestern.edu http://www.norstad.org September 11, 2002 Updated: November 3, 2011 Abstract We recapitulate the singleperiod
More informationEffect Sizes Based on Means
CHAPTER 4 Effect Sizes Based on Means Introduction Raw (unstardized) mean difference D Stardized mean difference, d g Resonse ratios INTRODUCTION When the studies reort means stard deviations, the referred
More informationA Multivariate Statistical Analysis of Stock Trends. Abstract
A Multivariate Statistical Analysis of Stock Trends Aril Kerby Alma College Alma, MI James Lawrence Miami University Oxford, OH Abstract Is there a method to redict the stock market? What factors determine
More informationLargeScale IP Traceback in HighSpeed Internet: Practical Techniques and Theoretical Foundation
LargeScale IP Traceback in HighSeed Internet: Practical Techniques and Theoretical Foundation Jun Li Minho Sung Jun (Jim) Xu College of Comuting Georgia Institute of Technology {junli,mhsung,jx}@cc.gatech.edu
More informationTimeCost TradeOffs in ResourceConstraint Project Scheduling Problems with Overlapping Modes
TimeCost TradeOffs in ResourceConstraint Proect Scheduling Problems with Overlaing Modes François Berthaut Robert Pellerin Nathalie Perrier Adnène Hai February 2011 CIRRELT201110 Bureaux de Montréal
More informationComparing Dissimilarity Measures for Symbolic Data Analysis
Comaring Dissimilarity Measures for Symbolic Data Analysis Donato MALERBA, Floriana ESPOSITO, Vincenzo GIOVIALE and Valentina TAMMA Diartimento di Informatica, University of Bari Via Orabona 4 76 Bari,
More informationCharacterizing and Modeling Network Traffic Variability
Characterizing and Modeling etwork Traffic Variability Sarat Pothuri, David W. Petr, Sohel Khan Information and Telecommunication Technology Center Electrical Engineering and Comuter Science Deartment,
More informationSeparating Trading and Banking: Consequences for Financial Stability
Searating Trading and Banking: Consequences for Financial Stability Hendrik Hakenes University of Bonn, Max Planck Institute Bonn, and CEPR Isabel Schnabel Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Max Planck
More informationReDispatch Approach for Congestion Relief in Deregulated Power Systems
ReDisatch Aroach for Congestion Relief in Deregulated ower Systems Ch. Naga Raja Kumari #1, M. Anitha 2 #1, 2 Assistant rofessor, Det. of Electrical Engineering RVR & JC College of Engineering, Guntur522019,
More informationCapital, Systemic Risk, Insurance Prices and Regulation
Caital, Systemic Risk, Insurance Prices and Regulation Ajay Subramanian J. Mack Robinson College of Business Georgia State University asubramanian@gsu.edu Jinjing Wang J. Mack Robinson College of Business
More informationOn Multicast Capacity and Delay in Cognitive Radio Mobile Adhoc Networks
On Multicast Caacity and Delay in Cognitive Radio Mobile Adhoc Networks Jinbei Zhang, Yixuan Li, Zhuotao Liu, Fan Wu, Feng Yang, Xinbing Wang Det of Electronic Engineering Det of Comuter Science and Engineering
More informationENFORCING SAFETY PROPERTIES IN WEB APPLICATIONS USING PETRI NETS
ENFORCING SAFETY PROPERTIES IN WEB APPLICATIONS USING PETRI NETS Liviu Grigore Comuter Science Deartment University of Illinois at Chicago Chicago, IL, 60607 lgrigore@cs.uic.edu Ugo Buy Comuter Science
More informationUniversiteitUtrecht. Department. of Mathematics. Optimal a priori error bounds for the. RayleighRitz method
UniversiteitUtrecht * Deartment of Mathematics Otimal a riori error bounds for the RayleighRitz method by Gerard L.G. Sleijen, Jaser van den Eshof, and Paul Smit Prerint nr. 1160 Setember, 2000 OPTIMAL
More informationBuffer Capacity Allocation: A method to QoS support on MPLS networks**
Buffer Caacity Allocation: A method to QoS suort on MPLS networks** M. K. Huerta * J. J. Padilla X. Hesselbach ϒ R. Fabregat O. Ravelo Abstract This aer describes an otimized model to suort QoS by mean
More informationCFRI 3,4. Zhengwei Wang PBC School of Finance, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China and SEBA, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at www.emeraldinsight.com/20441398.htm CFRI 3,4 322 constraints and cororate caital structure: a model Wuxiang Zhu School of Economics
More informationUnobservable Selection and Coefficient Stability: Theory and Evidence
Unobservable Selection and Coefficient Stability: Theory and Evidence Emily Oster Brown University and NBER November 24, 2014 Abstract A common heuristic for evaluating robustness of results to omitted
More informationService Network Design with Asset Management: Formulations and Comparative Analyzes
Service Network Design with Asset Management: Formulations and Comarative Analyzes Jardar Andersen Teodor Gabriel Crainic Marielle Christiansen October 2007 CIRRELT200740 Service Network Design with
More informationTRANSCENDENTAL NUMBERS
TRANSCENDENTAL NUMBERS JEREMY BOOHER. Introduction The Greeks tried unsuccessfully to square the circle with a comass and straightedge. In the 9th century, Lindemann showed that this is imossible by demonstrating
More informationUnderstanding the Impact of Weights Constraints in Portfolio Theory
Understanding the Impact of Weights Constraints in Portfolio Theory Thierry Roncalli Research & Development Lyxor Asset Management, Paris thierry.roncalli@lyxor.com January 2010 Abstract In this article,
More informationAn inventory control system for spare parts at a refinery: An empirical comparison of different reorder point methods
An inventory control system for sare arts at a refinery: An emirical comarison of different reorder oint methods Eric Porras a*, Rommert Dekker b a Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Sueriores de Monterrey,
More informationFE570 Financial Markets and Trading. Stevens Institute of Technology
FE570 Financial Markets and Trading Lecture 13. Execution Strategies (Ref. Anatoly Schmidt CHAPTER 13 Execution Strategies) Steve Yang Stevens Institute of Technology 11/27/2012 Outline 1 Execution Strategies
More informationBranchandPrice for Service Network Design with Asset Management Constraints
BranchandPrice for Servicee Network Design with Asset Management Constraints Jardar Andersen Roar Grønhaug Mariellee Christiansen Teodor Gabriel Crainic December 2007 CIRRELT200755 BranchandPrice
More informationPARAMETER CHOICE IN BANACH SPACE REGULARIZATION UNDER VARIATIONAL INEQUALITIES
PARAMETER CHOICE IN BANACH SPACE REGULARIZATION UNDER VARIATIONAL INEQUALITIES BERND HOFMANN AND PETER MATHÉ Abstract. The authors study arameter choice strategies for Tikhonov regularization of nonlinear
More informationLocal Connectivity Tests to Identify Wormholes in Wireless Networks
Local Connectivity Tests to Identify Wormholes in Wireless Networks Xiaomeng Ban Comuter Science Stony Brook University xban@cs.sunysb.edu Rik Sarkar Comuter Science Freie Universität Berlin sarkar@inf.fuberlin.de
More informationService Network Design with Asset Management: Formulations and Comparative Analyzes
Service Network Design with Asset Management: Formulations and Comarative Analyzes Jardar Andersen Teodor Gabriel Crainic Marielle Christiansen October 2007 CIRRELT200740 Service Network Design with
More information2. Meanvariance portfolio theory
2. Meanvariance portfolio theory (2.1) Markowitz s meanvariance formulation (2.2) Twofund theorem (2.3) Inclusion of the riskfree asset 1 2.1 Markowitz meanvariance formulation Suppose there are N
More informationMachine Learning with Operational Costs
Journal of Machine Learning Research 14 (2013) 19892028 Submitted 12/11; Revised 8/12; Published 7/13 Machine Learning with Oerational Costs Theja Tulabandhula Deartment of Electrical Engineering and
More informationlecture 25: Gaussian quadrature: nodes, weights; examples; extensions
38 lecture 25: Gaussian quadrature: nodes, weights; examles; extensions 3.5 Comuting Gaussian quadrature nodes and weights When first aroaching Gaussian quadrature, the comlicated characterization of the
More informationOn the predictive content of the PPI on CPI inflation: the case of Mexico
On the redictive content of the PPI on inflation: the case of Mexico José Sidaoui, Carlos Caistrán, Daniel Chiquiar and Manuel RamosFrancia 1 1. Introduction It would be natural to exect that shocks to
More informationThe Online Freezetag Problem
The Online Freezetag Problem Mikael Hammar, Bengt J. Nilsson, and Mia Persson Atus Technologies AB, IDEON, SE3 70 Lund, Sweden mikael.hammar@atus.com School of Technology and Society, Malmö University,
More informationPoint Location. Preprocess a planar, polygonal subdivision for point location queries. p = (18, 11)
Point Location Prerocess a lanar, olygonal subdivision for oint location ueries. = (18, 11) Inut is a subdivision S of comlexity n, say, number of edges. uild a data structure on S so that for a uery oint
More informationSQUARE GRID POINTS COVERAGED BY CONNECTED SOURCES WITH COVERAGE RADIUS OF ONE ON A TWODIMENSIONAL GRID
International Journal of Comuter Science & Information Technology (IJCSIT) Vol 6, No 4, August 014 SQUARE GRID POINTS COVERAGED BY CONNECTED SOURCES WITH COVERAGE RADIUS OF ONE ON A TWODIMENSIONAL GRID
More informationChapter 9, Part B Hypothesis Tests. Learning objectives
Chater 9, Part B Hyothesis Tests Slide 1 Learning objectives 1. Able to do hyothesis test about Poulation Proortion 2. Calculatethe Probability of Tye II Errors 3. Understand ower of the test 4. Determinethe
More informationDynamics of Open Source Movements
Dynamics of Oen Source Movements Susan Athey y and Glenn Ellison z January 2006 Abstract This aer considers a dynamic model of the evolution of oen source software rojects, focusing on the evolution of
More informationGraduate Business School
Mutual Fund Performance An Emirical Analysis of China s Mutual Fund Market Mingxia Lu and Yuzhong Zhao Graduate Business School Industrial and Financial Economics Master Thesis No 2005:6 Suervisor: Jianhua
More informationOptimal Consumption and Investment with Asymmetric Longterm/Shortterm Capital Gains Taxes
Optimal Consumption and Investment with Asymmetric Longterm/Shortterm Capital Gains Taxes Min Dai Hong Liu Yifei Zhong This revision: November 28, 2012 Abstract We propose an optimal consumption and
More informationApplications of Regret Theory to Asset Pricing
Alications of Regret Theory to Asset Pricing Anna Dodonova * Henry B. Tiie College of Business, University of Iowa Iowa City, Iowa 522421000 Tel.: +13193379958 Email address: annadodonova@uiowa.edu
More informationSoftmax Model as Generalization upon Logistic Discrimination Suffers from Overfitting
Journal of Data Science 12(2014),563574 Softmax Model as Generalization uon Logistic Discrimination Suffers from Overfitting F. Mohammadi Basatini 1 and Rahim Chiniardaz 2 1 Deartment of Statistics, Shoushtar
More informationOPTIMAL EXCHANGE BETTING STRATEGY FOR WINDRAWLOSS MARKETS
OPTIA EXCHANGE ETTING STRATEGY FOR WINDRAWOSS ARKETS Darren O Shaughnessy a,b a Ranking Software, elbourne b Corresonding author: darren@rankingsoftware.com Abstract Since the etfair betting exchange
More informationUnited Arab Emirates University College of Sciences Department of Mathematical Sciences HOMEWORK 1 SOLUTION. Section 10.1 Vectors in the Plane
United Arab Emirates University College of Sciences Deartment of Mathematical Sciences HOMEWORK 1 SOLUTION Section 10.1 Vectors in the Plane Calculus II for Engineering MATH 110 SECTION 0 CRN 510 :00 :00
More informationSAMPLE MIDTERM QUESTIONS
SAMPLE MIDTERM QUESTIONS William L. Silber HOW TO PREPARE FOR THE MID TERM: 1. Study in a group 2. Review the concept questions in the Before and After book 3. When you review the questions listed below,
More informationWeb Application Scalability: A ModelBased Approach
Coyright 24, Software Engineering Research and Performance Engineering Services. All rights reserved. Web Alication Scalability: A ModelBased Aroach Lloyd G. Williams, Ph.D. Software Engineering Research
More informationPartialOrder Planning Algorithms todomainfeatures. Information Sciences Institute University ofwaterloo
Relating the Performance of PartialOrder Planning Algorithms todomainfeatures Craig A. Knoblock Qiang Yang Information Sciences Institute University ofwaterloo University of Southern California Comuter
More informationLecture 1: Asset Allocation
Lecture 1: Asset Allocation Investments FIN460Papanikolaou Asset Allocation I 1/ 62 Overview 1. Introduction 2. Investor s Risk Tolerance 3. Allocating Capital Between a Risky and riskless asset 4. Allocating
More informationPressure Drop in Air Piping Systems Series of Technical White Papers from Ohio Medical Corporation
Pressure Dro in Air Piing Systems Series of Technical White Paers from Ohio Medical Cororation Ohio Medical Cororation Lakeside Drive Gurnee, IL 600 Phone: (800) 4480770 Fax: (847) 855604 info@ohiomedical.com
More informationA LogRobust Optimization Approach to Portfolio Management
A LogRobust Optimization Approach to Portfolio Management Dr. Aurélie Thiele Lehigh University Joint work with Ban Kawas Research partially supported by the National Science Foundation Grant CMMI0757983
More informationNBER WORKING PAPER SERIES HOW MUCH OF CHINESE EXPORTS IS REALLY MADE IN CHINA? ASSESSING DOMESTIC VALUEADDED WHEN PROCESSING TRADE IS PERVASIVE
NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES HOW MUCH OF CHINESE EXPORTS IS REALLY MADE IN CHINA? ASSESSING DOMESTIC VALUEADDED WHEN PROCESSING TRADE IS PERVASIVE Robert Kooman Zhi Wang ShangJin Wei Working Paer 14109
More informationFluent Software Training TRN99003. Solver Settings. Fluent Inc. 2/23/01
Solver Settings E1 Using the Solver Setting Solver Parameters Convergence Definition Monitoring Stability Accelerating Convergence Accuracy Grid Indeendence Adation Aendix: Background Finite Volume Method
More informationStatic and Dynamic Properties of Smallworld Connection Topologies Based on Transitstub Networks
Static and Dynamic Proerties of Smallworld Connection Toologies Based on Transitstub Networks Carlos Aguirre Fernando Corbacho Ramón Huerta Comuter Engineering Deartment, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid,
More informationFE670 Algorithmic Trading Strategies. Stevens Institute of Technology
FE670 Algorithmic Trading Strategies Lecture 6. Portfolio Optimization: Basic Theory and Practice Steve Yang Stevens Institute of Technology 10/03/2013 Outline 1 MeanVariance Analysis: Overview 2 Classical
More informationTHE HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM
האוניברסיטה העברית בירושלים THE HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM FIRM SPECIFIC AND MACRO HERDING BY PROFESSIONAL AND AMATEUR INVESTORS AND THEIR EFFECTS ON MARKET By ITZHAK VENEZIA, AMRUT NASHIKKAR, and
More informationEvaluating a WebBased Information System for Managing Master of Science Summer Projects
Evaluating a WebBased Information System for Managing Master of Science Summer Projects Till Rebenich University of Southamton tr08r@ecs.soton.ac.uk Andrew M. Gravell University of Southamton amg@ecs.soton.ac.uk
More informationFREQUENCIES OF SUCCESSIVE PAIRS OF PRIME RESIDUES
FREQUENCIES OF SUCCESSIVE PAIRS OF PRIME RESIDUES AVNER ASH, LAURA BELTIS, ROBERT GROSS, AND WARREN SINNOTT Abstract. We consider statistical roerties of the sequence of ordered airs obtained by taking
More informationBeyond the F Test: Effect Size Confidence Intervals and Tests of Close Fit in the Analysis of Variance and Contrast Analysis
Psychological Methods 004, Vol. 9, No., 164 18 Coyright 004 by the American Psychological Association 108989X/04/$1.00 DOI: 10.1037/108989X.9..164 Beyond the F Test: Effect Size Confidence Intervals
More informationTitle: Stochastic models of resource allocation for services
Title: Stochastic models of resource allocation for services Author: Ralh Badinelli,Professor, Virginia Tech, Deartment of BIT (235), Virginia Tech, Blacksburg VA 2461, USA, ralhb@vt.edu Phone : (54) 2317688,
More informationOn tests for multivariate normality and associated simulation studies
Journal of Statistical Comutation & Simulation Vol. 00, No. 00, January 2006, 1 14 On tests for multivariate normality and associated simulation studies Patrick J. Farrell Matias SalibianBarrera Katarzyna
More informationX How to Schedule a Cascade in an Arbitrary Graph
X How to Schedule a Cascade in an Arbitrary Grah Flavio Chierichetti, Cornell University Jon Kleinberg, Cornell University Alessandro Panconesi, Saienza University When individuals in a social network
More informationFinding a Needle in a Haystack: Pinpointing Significant BGP Routing Changes in an IP Network
Finding a Needle in a Haystack: Pinointing Significant BGP Routing Changes in an IP Network Jian Wu, Zhuoqing Morley Mao University of Michigan Jennifer Rexford Princeton University Jia Wang AT&T Labs
More informationThe risk of using the Q heterogeneity estimator for software engineering experiments
Dieste, O., Fernández, E., GarcíaMartínez, R., Juristo, N. 11. The risk of using the Q heterogeneity estimator for software engineering exeriments. The risk of using the Q heterogeneity estimator for
More informationA Modified Measure of Covert Network Performance
A Modified Measure of Covert Network Performance LYNNE L DOTY Marist College Deartment of Mathematics Poughkeesie, NY UNITED STATES lynnedoty@maristedu Abstract: In a covert network the need for secrecy
More informationCashintheMarket Pricing and Optimal Bank Bailout Policy 1
CashintheMaret Pricing and Otimal Ban Bailout Policy 1 Viral V. Acharya 2 London Business School and CEPR Tanju Yorulmazer 3 Ban of England J.E.L. Classification: G21, G28, G38, E58, D62. Keywords:
More information