APPENDIX L META ENVIRONMENTAL FORENSIC REPORTS
|
|
|
- Lee Jack Anderson
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 APPENDIX L META ENVIRONMENTAL FORENSIC REPORTS N:\ \WORD\Auburn RI (Final-June 2008).doc
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162 Environmental Forensic Report NYSEG - Auburn SDG: UR Report To: URS Corporation 77 Goodell Street Suite 5 Buffalo, NY Report By: D2/P2 (dialkyldibenzothiophenes/dialkylphenanthrenes) Figure 1. Double Ratio Plot source 3 source source 1 source source 6 spill source 5 spill spill 10 11spill spill 12 Potential source samples include 1 to 6 Spill samples include samples 7 to D3/P3 (trialkyldibenzothiophenes/trialkylphenanthrenes) META Environmental, Inc. 49 Clarendon Street Watertown, MA October 30, 2006 Identifying and allocating sources of pollutants in complex environments. META ENGINEERING & CHEMISTRY Environmental, Inc.
163 Final Laboratory Report META Environmental, Inc. 49 Clarendon Street Watertown, MA Phone: Fax: Certification This certifies that this package is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the contract, both technically and for completeness, for other than the conditions detailed herein. Release of the data contained in this hardcopy data package has been authorized by the Laboratory Manager and Quality Assurance Officer, as verified by the following signatures. James A. Roush Environmental Scientist, Laboratory Manager October 30, 2006 Date David M. Mauro Senior Scientist, Quality Assurance Officer October 30, 2006 Date UR Report Page 1 10/30/2006
164 Sample Delivery Group Narrative Project: NYSEG - Auburn URS Corporation 77 Goodell Street Suite 5 Buffalo, NY Report Contact: Mike Gutmann Dates of Receipt: September 20, 2006 SDG: Sample Summary: META Project Number: UR The sample received for this project is summarized in the attached sample login forms. U03008 Chain of Custody The samples were received in good condition. The internal temperature of the shipment containers were as follows: Sample received: 09/20/ C Internal chain of custody procedures were followed after sample receipt. Samples were stored in a locked refrigerator. A sample custody logbook contains the record of sample removal from the secure sample storage area to the sample preparation laboratory. The custody record for the sample extracts is present on the sample extraction logbook page. The disposal of samples and extracts will be authorized one month after the release of this data report. Sample disposal will be documented. UR Report Page 2 10/30/2006
165 Methods The sediment samples were prepared by solvent extraction (EPA 3570) using dichloromethane (DCM). The extracts were spiked with internal standard and analyzed by GC/FID (EPA 8100M), GC/ECD (EPA 8082M) and GC/MS/SIM (EPA 8270M). Results Sample results are presented in summary forms (CLP Form 1 equivalent) which follow this narrative. Quality Control Analyte Flags The detection limits were determined as the sample equivalent of the lowest linear initial calibration standard. Analytes measured between 50% and 100% of the lowest standard were reported as "estimated" and flagged with the letter "J." Undetected analytes were reported as null and flagged with the letter, "U." Analytes marked with a "B" were detected in the associated blank and should be reviewed for a possible positive bias. Holding Times The samples were extracted within holding times. The samples and extracts were stored at 4 C ± 2 C prior to extraction and analysis. The extracts were analyzed within 40 days of sample preparation. Surrogate Spikes Extraction surrogates were added to all samples prior to extraction. All surrogate compounds were recovered within the 50%-120% acceptable criterion. Blanks No target compounds were detected in the method blank. UR Report Page 3 10/30/2006
166 Blank Spikes A Blank Spike sample was extracted with the sample batch. All spiked compounds were recovered within criteria (50 120%). Duplicates A duplicate analysis was performed on sample SED-21 (0-1 ). Many relative percent differences (RPDs) were greater than 50%. Interpretation SED-21 (0-1) Sample SED-21 (0-1) contained pyrogenic and petrogenic material (see definitions). The pyrogenic material was indicated by the prominent 3-, 4-, and 5-ring unsubstituted polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). The concentration of total PAHs was 51 mg/kg. The ratio of fluoranthene to pyrene (1.238; see Table 1) was similar to other sediment samples collected from the site (3). The petrogenic material was present at low relative concentrations. It was indicated by the broad unresolved complex mixture (UCM) late in the chromatogram (Appendix B) and the presence of biomarker compounds (Appendix E). These petrogenic characteristics are consistent with urban background. SED-23 (0-1) This sample is similar to sample SED-21 (0-1). The concentration of total PAHs was 183 mg/kg. SED-26 (0-1) This sample is similar to sample SED-21 (0-1). The concentration of total PAHs was 32.1 mg/kg. Discussion All three sediment samples show very similar characteristics in both the GC/FID fingerprints (Appendix B) and the diagnostic ratios (Table 1). These include a pyrogenic pattern of high molecular weight PAHs and a UCM characteristic of urban background. Also, the diagnostic ratios of the three sediment samples were similar to the sediment sample diagnostic ratios discussed in reference 3 and summarized in Table 2. The PAH patterns of the sediment samples are not the same as those of the NAPL and soil samples collected on the former Clark St MGP site, as discussed in reference 3. UR Report Page 4 10/30/2006
167 Definitions Pyrogenic substances are complex mixtures of primarily hydrocarbons produced from organic matter subjected to high temperatures but with insufficient oxygen for complete combustion. Pyrogenic materials are produced by fires, internal combustion engines, and furnaces. They also are formed when coke or gas are produced from coal or oil. Coal-tar based products, such as roofing, pavement sealers, waterproofing, pesticides, and some shampoos contain pyrogenic materials. Petrogenic substances include crude oil and crude oil derivatives such as gasoline, heating oil, and asphalt. Pitch is the semi-solid or solid material consisting of high molecular weight hydrocarbons that remain following coal tar distillation. References 1) Mauro, D.M., Chemical Source Attribution at former MGP Sites, EPRI Report , December ) Chemical Fingerprinting of Hydrocarbons, in: Introduction to Environmental Forensics. B.L. Murphy and R.D. Morrison editors, Academic Press, San Diego, CA ) Forensic Review of Sediment Data from the Owasco Lake Outlet near the former Clark Street Manufactured Gas Plant, META Environmental, Inc., May 17, UR Report Page 5 10/30/2006
168 Table 1. Selected Source and Weathering Ratios Fl/Py D/F C17/Pris C18/Phy Pris/Phy C3D/C3PA C3D/C3PA BF/MP BeP/BaP BaA/C SED-21 (0-1) SED-23 (0-1) SED-26 (0-1) SED-21 (0-1) dup Ratios: Fl/Py D/F C17/Pris C18/Phy Pris/Phy C3D/C3PA C2D/C2PA BF/MP BeP/BaP BaA/C fluoranthene/pyrene dibenzofuran/fluorene heptadecane/pristane octadecane/phytane pristane/phytane trialkyldibenzothiophenes/trialkylphenanthrenes/anthracenes dialkyldibenzothiophenes/dialkylphenanthrenes/anthracenes benzofluorenes/methylpyrenes benzo(e)pyrene/benzo(a)pyrene benz(a)anthracene/chrysene Table 2. Summary statistics for selected ratios from Reference 3 Ratio Mean Sediment Samples Soil & NAPL Samples Literature Values Standard Deviation %RSD Mean Standard Deviation %RS D CWG 1 CC, CO, CR 1 Urban Background Soil 2 Fl/Py ± ± 0.18 D/F NA BeP/BaP NA NA 1.14 ± 0.51 BF/MP NA NA NA BaA/C ± ± ± 0.23 NA not available 1 Mauro, Mauro et al., 2006 UR Report Page 6 10/30/2006
169 Figure 1. Selected Diagnostic Ratios D/F v. Fl/Py T202, CC Dibenzofuran/Fluorene P066, PB Crude P128, #6 Fuel Oil P013, Gas Oil SED-26 (0-1) T060, CC T049, CO T185, CO T009, CC SED-21 (0-1) T124, CR P065, Bunker C P127, #4 Fuel Oil P063, #2 Fuel oil SED-23 (0-1) P126, Diesel T165, CWG T140, CWG T004, CWG Fluoranthene/Pyrene TXXX/PXXX Reference samples from META s in house archive (the T or P number is the catalog number in META s archive database and identifies the sample and site from which it was collected) CC Coal Carbonization Tar CO Coke Oven Tar CR CWG Creosote Carbureted Water Gas Tar Field Samples UR Report Page 7 10/30/2006
170 Figure 2. Selected Diagnostic Ratios C3D/C3PA v. C2D/C2PA P065, Bunker C P066, PB Crude C2D/C2PA P013, Gas Oil P128, #6 Fuel Oil P127, #4 Fuel Oil T004, CWG SED-26 (0-1) P126, Diesel SED-21 (0-1) SED-23 (0-1) T049, CO T124, CR T140, CWG T202, CC T185, CO P063, #2 Fuel oil T165, CWG T009, CC T060, CC C3D/C3PA TXXX/PXXX Reference samples from META s in house archive (the T or P number is the catalog number in META s archive database and identifies the sample and site from which it was collected) CC Coal Carbonization Tar CO Coke Oven Tar CR CWG Creosote Carbureted Water Gas Tar Field Samples UR Report Page 8 10/30/2006
171 Figure 3. Comparison of SDG UR PAH Ratios to All Site Samples CSSB CSTT CSTT CSSB MW-06D-NAPL MW-09D-NAPL SED SED-15 SED-06 SED-18 SED-14 SED-23 (0-1) BaA/C SED-26 (0-1) SED-12 SED-07 SED-03 SED-16 SED-04 SED-10 SED-08 SED-01 SED-19 SED-21 (0-1) 0.8 SED-02 SED-13 SED-20 SED-05 SED SED Fl/Py Orange circles are sediment samples from SDG UR060920; blue diamonds are on-site soil and NAPL samples from the Clark Street former MGP site; green triangles are downstream sediments; pink circles are near-site sediments; and black squares are upstream sediments. Downstream, near-site, and upstream sediments are as defined in reference 3. UR Report Page 9 10/30/2006
172 Appendix A Chains of Custody
173
174
175 Appendix B GC/FID Fingerprints
176 GC/FID Fingerprint C D\FID2B SS1 SS2 IS 1 benzene 2 toluene 3 ethylbenzene 4 m/p-xylene 5 styrene 6 o-xylene 7 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene 8 naphthalene 9 2-methylnaphthalene 10 1-methylnaphthalene 11 acenaphthylene 12 acenaphthene 13 dibenzofuran 14 fluorene 15 phenanthrene 16 anthracene 17 fluoranthene 18 pyrene 19 benz(a)anthracene 20 chrysene 21 benzo(b)fluoranthene 22 benzo(k)fluoranthene 23 benzo(a)pyrene 24 indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 25 dibenz(a,h)anthracene 26 benzo(g,h,i)perylene , ,20 21,22 23 UR ppt IS 5-a-androstane SS1 2-Fluorobiphenyl SS2 o-terphenyl Time (min.) Field ID: SED-21 (0-1) Laboratory ID: UR Method: EPA 8100 mod. META
177 GC/FID Fingerprint C D\FID2B SS1 SS2 17 IS 1 benzene 2 toluene 3 ethylbenzene 4 m/p-xylene 5 styrene 6 o-xylene 7 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene 8 naphthalene 9 2-methylnaphthalene 10 1-methylnaphthalene 11 acenaphthylene 12 acenaphthene 13 dibenzofuran 14 fluorene 15 phenanthrene 16 anthracene 17 fluoranthene 18 pyrene 19 benz(a)anthracene 20 chrysene 21 benzo(b)fluoranthene 22 benzo(k)fluoranthene 23 benzo(a)pyrene 24 indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 25 dibenz(a,h)anthracene 26 benzo(g,h,i)perylene ,16 19,20 21, , UR ppt IS 5-a-androstane SS1 2-Fluorobiphenyl SS2 o-terphenyl Time (min.) Field ID: SED-23 (0-1) Laboratory ID: UR Method: EPA 8100 mod. META
178 GC/FID Fingerprint C D\FID2B SS1 SS2 IS 1 benzene 2 toluene 3 ethylbenzene 4 m/p-xylene 5 styrene 6 o-xylene 7 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene 8 naphthalene 9 2-methylnaphthalene 10 1-methylnaphthalene 11 acenaphthylene 12 acenaphthene 13 dibenzofuran 14 fluorene 15 phenanthrene 16 anthracene 17 fluoranthene 18 pyrene 19 benz(a)anthracene 20 chrysene 21 benzo(b)fluoranthene 22 benzo(k)fluoranthene 23 benzo(a)pyrene 24 indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 25 dibenz(a,h)anthracene 26 benzo(g,h,i)perylene ,20 GO ppt Time (min.) IS 5-a-androstane SS1 2-Fluorobiphenyl SS2 o-terphenyl Field ID: SED-26 (0-1) Laboratory ID: UR Method: EPA 8100 mod. META
179 GC/FID Fingerprint C D\FID2B SS1 SS2 IS 1 benzene 2 toluene 3 ethylbenzene 4 m/p-xylene 5 styrene 6 o-xylene 7 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene 8 naphthalene 9 2-methylnaphthalene 10 1-methylnaphthalene 11 acenaphthylene 12 acenaphthene 13 dibenzofuran 14 fluorene 15 phenanthrene 16 anthracene 17 fluoranthene 18 pyrene 19 benz(a)anthracene 20 chrysene 21 benzo(b)fluoranthene 22 benzo(k)fluoranthene 23 benzo(a)pyrene 24 indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 25 dibenz(a,h)anthracene 26 benzo(g,h,i)perylene GO ppt IS 5-a-androstane SS1 2-Fluorobiphenyl SS2 o-terphenyl Time (min.) Field ID: Soil Blank Laboratory ID: GO SB Method: EPA 8100 mod. META
180 Appendix C MAH/PAH Concentrations
181 Analytical Results for Volatile and Semivolatile Organics META Environmental, Inc. Field ID: SED-21 (0-1) Client: URS Corporation Preparation Method: EPA 3570 Project: NYSEG Auburn Cleanup Method(s): NA Analysis Method: EPA 8270M Lab ID UR File ID: E D Matrix: Soil Preservation: None Date Sampled: 9/19/2006 Decanted: None Date Received: 9/20/2006 Date Prepared: 9/20/2006 Sample Size (g): 2.20 Date Cleanup: NA Percent Solid: 85% Date Analyzed: 9/22/2006 Extract Volume (µl): 2000 Instrument: El Camino Prep DF: 1.00 Operator: JAR Analysis DF: 1.00 Injection Volume (µl): 1.00 Batch QC: GO SB Analyte Concentration (mg/kg dry wt.) RL EDL Comments MAH & PAH COMPOUNDS: Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene m/p-xylenes Styrene o-xylene Isopropylbenzene J n-propylbenzene ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene t-butylbenzene U sec-butylbenzene U p-isopropyltoluene n-butylbenzene C1 - Benzene C2 - Benzene C3 - Benzene C4 - Benzene C5 - Benzene trans-decalin J cis-decalin U Naphthalene Methylnaphthalene Methylnaphthalene C1 - Naphthalene C2 - Naphthalene C3- Naphthalene C4- Naphthalene Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene Dibenzofuran Fluorene C1 - Fluorene C2 - Fluorene C3 - Fluorene Phenanthrene Anthracene /18/2006 UR xls
182 Analytical Results for Volatile and Semivolatile Organics META Environmental, Inc. Field ID: SED-21 (0-1) Client: URS Corporation Preparation Method: EPA 3570 Project: NYSEG Auburn Cleanup Method(s): NA Analysis Method: EPA 8270M Lab ID UR File ID: E D Matrix: Soil Preservation: None Date Sampled: 9/19/2006 Decanted: None Date Received: 9/20/2006 Date Prepared: 9/20/2006 Sample Size (g): 2.20 Date Cleanup: NA Percent Solid: 85% Date Analyzed: 9/22/2006 Extract Volume (µl): 2000 Instrument: El Camino Prep DF: 1.00 Operator: JAR Analysis DF: 1.00 Injection Volume (µl): 1.00 Batch QC: GO SB Analyte Concentration (mg/kg dry wt.) RL EDL Comments C1 - Phenanthrene/Anthracene C2 - Phenanthrene/Anthracene C3 - Phenanthrene/Anthracene C4 - Phenanthrene/Anthracene Dibenzothiophene C1 - Dibenzothiophene C2 - Dibenzothiophene C3 - Dibenzothiophene C4 - Dibenzothiophene Benzo(b)naphtho(2,1-d)thiophene Fluoranthene Pyrene C1 - Fluoranthene/Pyrene C2 - Fluoranthene/Pyrene C3 - Fluoranthene/Pyrene Benz[a]anthracene Chrysene* C1 - Benz(a)anthracene/Chrysene C2 - Benz(a)anthracene/Chrysene C3 - Benz(a)anthracene/Chrysene C4 - Benz(a)anthracene/Chrysene Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzo[j/k]fluoranthene Benzo(e)pyrene Benzo[a]pyrene Perylene Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene Dibenz[a,h]anthracene Benzo[g,h,i]perylene Coronene Retene Benzo(b/c)fluorenes Methylpyrene Methylpyrene Methylpyrene Heptadecane Pristane Octadecane Phytane /18/2006 UR xls
183 Analytical Results for Volatile and Semivolatile Organics META Environmental, Inc. Field ID: SED-21 (0-1) Client: URS Corporation Preparation Method: EPA 3570 Project: NYSEG Auburn Cleanup Method(s): NA Analysis Method: EPA 8270M Lab ID UR File ID: E D Matrix: Soil Preservation: None Date Sampled: 9/19/2006 Decanted: None Date Received: 9/20/2006 Date Prepared: 9/20/2006 Sample Size (g): 2.20 Date Cleanup: NA Percent Solid: 85% Date Analyzed: 9/22/2006 Extract Volume (µl): 2000 Instrument: El Camino Prep DF: 1.00 Operator: JAR Analysis DF: 1.00 Injection Volume (µl): 1.00 Batch QC: GO SB Analyte Concentration (mg/kg dry wt.) RL EDL Comments 2,6,10-trimethyldodecane ,6,10-trimethyltridecane Norpristane Total PAH (16) Total PAH (42) Extraction Surrogate Recoveries (%) Limits Toluene-d Phenanthrene-d Perylene-d NA - Not applicable. B - Analyte detected in the Blank. J - Estimated value; detected between the RL and DL. U - Analyte not detected above DL. D - Analyte reported from a diluted extract. E - Estimate, result detected above calibration range. I - Concentration/Peak ID uncertain due to potential interference. RL - Reporting limit is the sample equivalent of the lowest linear calibration concentration. EDL - Estimated detection limit is 50% of RL. * - Triphenylene is known to coelute with this compound. 10/18/2006 UR xls
184 Analytical Results for Volatile and Semivolatile Organics META Environmental, Inc. Field ID: SED-23 (0-1) Client: URS Corporation Preparation Method: EPA 3570 Project: NYSEG Auburn Cleanup Method(s): NA Analysis Method: EPA 8270M Lab ID UR File ID: E D Matrix: Soil Preservation: None Date Sampled: 9/19/2006 Decanted: None Date Received: 9/20/2006 Date Prepared: 9/20/2006 Sample Size (g): 2.17 Date Cleanup: NA Percent Solid: 60% Date Analyzed: 9/22/2006 Extract Volume (µl): 2000 Instrument: El Camino Prep DF: 1.00 Operator: JAR Analysis DF: 1.00 Injection Volume (µl): 1.00 Batch QC: GO SB Analyte Concentration (mg/kg dry wt.) RL EDL Comments MAH & PAH COMPOUNDS: Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene m/p-xylenes Styrene o-xylene Isopropylbenzene J n-propylbenzene ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene t-butylbenzene U sec-butylbenzene U p-isopropyltoluene n-butylbenzene C1 - Benzene C2 - Benzene C3 - Benzene C4 - Benzene C5 - Benzene trans-decalin J cis-decalin U Naphthalene Methylnaphthalene Methylnaphthalene C1 - Naphthalene C2 - Naphthalene C3- Naphthalene C4- Naphthalene Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene Dibenzofuran Fluorene C1 - Fluorene C2 - Fluorene C3 - Fluorene Phenanthrene Anthracene /18/2006 UR xls
185 Analytical Results for Volatile and Semivolatile Organics META Environmental, Inc. Field ID: SED-23 (0-1) Client: URS Corporation Preparation Method: EPA 3570 Project: NYSEG Auburn Cleanup Method(s): NA Analysis Method: EPA 8270M Lab ID UR File ID: E D Matrix: Soil Preservation: None Date Sampled: 9/19/2006 Decanted: None Date Received: 9/20/2006 Date Prepared: 9/20/2006 Sample Size (g): 2.17 Date Cleanup: NA Percent Solid: 60% Date Analyzed: 9/22/2006 Extract Volume (µl): 2000 Instrument: El Camino Prep DF: 1.00 Operator: JAR Analysis DF: 1.00 Injection Volume (µl): 1.00 Batch QC: GO SB Analyte Concentration (mg/kg dry wt.) RL EDL Comments C1 - Phenanthrene/Anthracene C2 - Phenanthrene/Anthracene C3 - Phenanthrene/Anthracene C4 - Phenanthrene/Anthracene Dibenzothiophene C1 - Dibenzothiophene C2 - Dibenzothiophene C3 - Dibenzothiophene C4 - Dibenzothiophene Benzo(b)naphtho(2,1-d)thiophene Fluoranthene 33.4 D Pyrene 26.3 D C1 - Fluoranthene/Pyrene C2 - Fluoranthene/Pyrene C3 - Fluoranthene/Pyrene Benz[a]anthracene Chrysene* C1 - Benz(a)anthracene/Chrysene C2 - Benz(a)anthracene/Chrysene C3 - Benz(a)anthracene/Chrysene C4 - Benz(a)anthracene/Chrysene Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzo[j/k]fluoranthene Benzo(e)pyrene Benzo[a]pyrene Perylene Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene Dibenz[a,h]anthracene Benzo[g,h,i]perylene Coronene Retene Benzo(b/c)fluorenes Methylpyrene Methylpyrene Methylpyrene Heptadecane Pristane Octadecane Phytane /18/2006 UR xls
186 Analytical Results for Volatile and Semivolatile Organics META Environmental, Inc. Field ID: SED-23 (0-1) Client: URS Corporation Preparation Method: EPA 3570 Project: NYSEG Auburn Cleanup Method(s): NA Analysis Method: EPA 8270M Lab ID UR File ID: E D Matrix: Soil Preservation: None Date Sampled: 9/19/2006 Decanted: None Date Received: 9/20/2006 Date Prepared: 9/20/2006 Sample Size (g): 2.17 Date Cleanup: NA Percent Solid: 60% Date Analyzed: 9/22/2006 Extract Volume (µl): 2000 Instrument: El Camino Prep DF: 1.00 Operator: JAR Analysis DF: 1.00 Injection Volume (µl): 1.00 Batch QC: GO SB Analyte Concentration (mg/kg dry wt.) RL EDL Comments 2,6,10-trimethyldodecane ,6,10-trimethyltridecane Norpristane Total PAH (16) Total PAH (42) Extraction Surrogate Recoveries (%) Limits Toluene-d Phenanthrene-d Perylene-d NA - Not applicable. B - Analyte detected in the Blank. J - Estimated value; detected between the RL and DL. U - Analyte not detected above DL. D - Analyte reported from a diluted extract. E - Estimate, result detected above calibration range. I - Concentration/Peak ID uncertain due to potential interference. RL - Reporting limit is the sample equivalent of the lowest linear calibration concentration. EDL - Estimated detection limit is 50% of RL. * - Triphenylene is known to coelute with this compound. 10/18/2006 UR xls
187 Analytical Results for Volatile and Semivolatile Organics META Environmental, Inc. Field ID: SED-26 (0-1) Client: URS Corporation Preparation Method: EPA 3570 Project: NYSEG Auburn Cleanup Method(s): NA Analysis Method: EPA 8270M Lab ID UR File ID: E D Matrix: Soil Preservation: None Date Sampled: 9/19/2006 Decanted: None Date Received: 9/20/2006 Date Prepared: 9/20/2006 Sample Size (g): 2.23 Date Cleanup: NA Percent Solid: 47% Date Analyzed: 9/22/2006 Extract Volume (µl): 2000 Instrument: El Camino Prep DF: 1.00 Operator: JAR Analysis DF: 1.00 Injection Volume (µl): 1.00 Batch QC: GO SB Analyte Concentration (mg/kg dry wt.) RL EDL Comments MAH & PAH COMPOUNDS: Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene m/p-xylenes Styrene o-xylene Isopropylbenzene J n-propylbenzene ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene t-butylbenzene U sec-butylbenzene U p-isopropyltoluene n-butylbenzene C1 - Benzene C2 - Benzene C3 - Benzene C4 - Benzene C5 - Benzene trans-decalin J cis-decalin U Naphthalene Methylnaphthalene Methylnaphthalene C1 - Naphthalene C2 - Naphthalene C3- Naphthalene C4- Naphthalene Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene Dibenzofuran Fluorene C1 - Fluorene C2 - Fluorene C3 - Fluorene Phenanthrene Anthracene /18/2006 UR xls
188 Analytical Results for Volatile and Semivolatile Organics META Environmental, Inc. Field ID: SED-26 (0-1) Client: URS Corporation Preparation Method: EPA 3570 Project: NYSEG Auburn Cleanup Method(s): NA Analysis Method: EPA 8270M Lab ID UR File ID: E D Matrix: Soil Preservation: None Date Sampled: 9/19/2006 Decanted: None Date Received: 9/20/2006 Date Prepared: 9/20/2006 Sample Size (g): 2.23 Date Cleanup: NA Percent Solid: 47% Date Analyzed: 9/22/2006 Extract Volume (µl): 2000 Instrument: El Camino Prep DF: 1.00 Operator: JAR Analysis DF: 1.00 Injection Volume (µl): 1.00 Batch QC: GO SB Analyte Concentration (mg/kg dry wt.) RL EDL Comments C1 - Phenanthrene/Anthracene C2 - Phenanthrene/Anthracene C3 - Phenanthrene/Anthracene C4 - Phenanthrene/Anthracene Dibenzothiophene C1 - Dibenzothiophene C2 - Dibenzothiophene C3 - Dibenzothiophene C4 - Dibenzothiophene Benzo(b)naphtho(2,1-d)thiophene Fluoranthene Pyrene C1 - Fluoranthene/Pyrene C2 - Fluoranthene/Pyrene C3 - Fluoranthene/Pyrene Benz[a]anthracene Chrysene* C1 - Benz(a)anthracene/Chrysene C2 - Benz(a)anthracene/Chrysene C3 - Benz(a)anthracene/Chrysene C4 - Benz(a)anthracene/Chrysene Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzo[j/k]fluoranthene Benzo(e)pyrene Benzo[a]pyrene Perylene Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene Dibenz[a,h]anthracene Benzo[g,h,i]perylene Coronene Retene Benzo(b/c)fluorenes Methylpyrene Methylpyrene Methylpyrene Heptadecane Pristane Octadecane Phytane /18/2006 UR xls
189 Analytical Results for Volatile and Semivolatile Organics META Environmental, Inc. Field ID: SED-26 (0-1) Client: URS Corporation Preparation Method: EPA 3570 Project: NYSEG Auburn Cleanup Method(s): NA Analysis Method: EPA 8270M Lab ID UR File ID: E D Matrix: Soil Preservation: None Date Sampled: 9/19/2006 Decanted: None Date Received: 9/20/2006 Date Prepared: 9/20/2006 Sample Size (g): 2.23 Date Cleanup: NA Percent Solid: 47% Date Analyzed: 9/22/2006 Extract Volume (µl): 2000 Instrument: El Camino Prep DF: 1.00 Operator: JAR Analysis DF: 1.00 Injection Volume (µl): 1.00 Batch QC: GO SB Analyte Concentration (mg/kg dry wt.) RL EDL Comments 2,6,10-trimethyldodecane ,6,10-trimethyltridecane Norpristane Total PAH (16) Total PAH (42) Extraction Surrogate Recoveries (%) Limits Toluene-d Phenanthrene-d Perylene-d NA - Not applicable. B - Analyte detected in the Blank. J - Estimated value; detected between the RL and DL. U - Analyte not detected above DL. D - Analyte reported from a diluted extract. E - Estimate, result detected above calibration range. I - Concentration/Peak ID uncertain due to potential interference. RL - Reporting limit is the sample equivalent of the lowest linear calibration concentration. EDL - Estimated detection limit is 50% of RL. * - Triphenylene is known to coelute with this compound. 10/18/2006 UR xls
190 Analytical Results for Volatile and Semivolatile Organics META Environmental, Inc. Field ID: Soil Blank Client: URS Corporation Preparation Method: EPA 3570 Project: NYSEG Auburn Cleanup Method(s): NA Analysis Method: EPA 8270M Lab ID GO SB File ID: E D Matrix: Soil Preservation: None Date Sampled: NA Decanted: None Date Received: NA Date Prepared: 9/20/2006 Sample Size (g): 2.00 Date Cleanup: NA Percent Solid: 100% Date Analyzed: 9/21/2006 Extract Volume (µl): 2000 Instrument: El Camino Prep DF: 1.00 Operator: JAR Analysis DF: 1.00 Injection Volume (µl): 1.00 Batch QC: GO SB Analyte Concentration (mg/kg dry wt.) RL EDL Comments MAH & PAH COMPOUNDS: Benzene U Toluene U Ethylbenzene U m/p-xylenes U Styrene U o-xylene U Isopropylbenzene U n-propylbenzene U ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene U ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene U t-butylbenzene U sec-butylbenzene U p-isopropyltoluene U n-butylbenzene U C1 - Benzene U C2 - Benzene U C3 - Benzene U C4 - Benzene U C5 - Benzene U trans-decalin U cis-decalin U Naphthalene U Methylnaphthalene U Methylnaphthalene U C1 - Naphthalene U C2 - Naphthalene U C3- Naphthalene U C4- Naphthalene U Acenaphthylene U Acenaphthene U Dibenzofuran U Fluorene U C1 - Fluorene U C2 - Fluorene U C3 - Fluorene U Phenanthrene U Anthracene U /18/2006 UR xls
191 Analytical Results for Volatile and Semivolatile Organics META Environmental, Inc. Field ID: Soil Blank Client: URS Corporation Preparation Method: EPA 3570 Project: NYSEG Auburn Cleanup Method(s): NA Analysis Method: EPA 8270M Lab ID GO SB File ID: E D Matrix: Soil Preservation: None Date Sampled: NA Decanted: None Date Received: NA Date Prepared: 9/20/2006 Sample Size (g): 2.00 Date Cleanup: NA Percent Solid: 100% Date Analyzed: 9/21/2006 Extract Volume (µl): 2000 Instrument: El Camino Prep DF: 1.00 Operator: JAR Analysis DF: 1.00 Injection Volume (µl): 1.00 Batch QC: GO SB Analyte Concentration (mg/kg dry wt.) RL EDL Comments C1 - Phenanthrene/Anthracene U C2 - Phenanthrene/Anthracene U C3 - Phenanthrene/Anthracene U C4 - Phenanthrene/Anthracene U Dibenzothiophene U C1 - Dibenzothiophene U C2 - Dibenzothiophene U C3 - Dibenzothiophene U C4 - Dibenzothiophene U Benzo(b)naphtho(2,1-d)thiophene U Fluoranthene U Pyrene U C1 - Fluoranthene/Pyrene U C2 - Fluoranthene/Pyrene U C3 - Fluoranthene/Pyrene U Benz[a]anthracene U Chrysene* U C1 - Benz(a)anthracene/Chrysene U C2 - Benz(a)anthracene/Chrysene U C3 - Benz(a)anthracene/Chrysene U C4 - Benz(a)anthracene/Chrysene U Benzo[b]fluoranthene U Benzo[j/k]fluoranthene U Benzo(e)pyrene U Benzo[a]pyrene U Perylene U Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene U Dibenz[a,h]anthracene U Benzo[g,h,i]perylene U Coronene U Retene U Benzo(b/c)fluorenes U Methylpyrene U Methylpyrene U Methylpyrene U Heptadecane U Pristane U Octadecane U Phytane U /18/2006 UR xls
192 Analytical Results for Volatile and Semivolatile Organics META Environmental, Inc. Field ID: Soil Blank Client: URS Corporation Preparation Method: EPA 3570 Project: NYSEG Auburn Cleanup Method(s): NA Analysis Method: EPA 8270M Lab ID GO SB File ID: E D Matrix: Soil Preservation: None Date Sampled: NA Decanted: None Date Received: NA Date Prepared: 9/20/2006 Sample Size (g): 2.00 Date Cleanup: NA Percent Solid: 100% Date Analyzed: 9/21/2006 Extract Volume (µl): 2000 Instrument: El Camino Prep DF: 1.00 Operator: JAR Analysis DF: 1.00 Injection Volume (µl): 1.00 Batch QC: GO SB Analyte Concentration (mg/kg dry wt.) RL EDL Comments 2,6,10-trimethyldodecane U ,6,10-trimethyltridecane U Norpristane U Total PAH (16) U Total PAH (42) U Extraction Surrogate Recoveries (%) Limits Toluene-d Phenanthrene-d Perylene-d NA - Not applicable. B - Analyte detected in the Blank. J - Estimated value; detected between the RL and DL. U - Analyte not detected above DL. D - Analyte reported from a diluted extract. E - Estimate, result detected above calibration range. I - Concentration/Peak ID uncertain due to potential interference. RL - Reporting limit is the sample equivalent of the lowest linear calibration concentration. EDL - Estimated detection limit is 50% of RL. * - Triphenylene is known to coelute with this compound. 10/18/2006 UR xls
193 Analytical Results for Volatile and Semivolatile Organics META Environmental, Inc. Field ID: Soil Blank Spike Client: URS Corporation Preparation Method: EPA 3570 Project: NYSEG Auburn Cleanup Method(s): NA Analysis Method: EPA 8270M Lab ID GO SBS File ID: E D Matrix: Soil Preservation: None Date Sampled: NA Decanted: None Date Received: NA Date Prepared: 9/20/2006 Sample Size (g): 2.00 Date Cleanup: NA Percent Solid: 100% Date Analyzed: 9/21/2006 Extract Volume (µl): 2000 Instrument: El Camino Prep DF: 1.00 Operator: JAR Analysis DF: 1.00 Injection Volume (µl): 1.00 Batch QC: GO SB Analyte Concentration (mg/kg dry wt.) RL EDL Comments MAH & PAH COMPOUNDS: Spike Amount % Recovery Benzene % Toluene % Ethylbenzene % m/p-xylenes % Styrene % o-xylene % Isopropylbenzene % n-propylbenzene % 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene % 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene % t-butylbenzene U sec-butylbenzene % p-isopropyltoluene % n-butylbenzene % C1 - Benzene U C2 - Benzene U C3 - Benzene U C4 - Benzene U C5 - Benzene U trans-decalin U cis-decalin U Naphthalene % 2-Methylnaphthalene % 1-Methylnaphthalene % C1 - Naphthalene U C2 - Naphthalene U C3- Naphthalene U C4- Naphthalene U Acenaphthylene % Acenaphthene % Dibenzofuran % Fluorene % C1 - Fluorene U C2 - Fluorene U C3 - Fluorene U Phenanthrene % Anthracene % 10/18/2006 UR xls
194 Analytical Results for Volatile and Semivolatile Organics META Environmental, Inc. Field ID: Soil Blank Spike Client: URS Corporation Preparation Method: EPA 3570 Project: NYSEG Auburn Cleanup Method(s): NA Analysis Method: EPA 8270M Lab ID GO SBS File ID: E D Matrix: Soil Preservation: None Date Sampled: NA Decanted: None Date Received: NA Date Prepared: 9/20/2006 Sample Size (g): 2.00 Date Cleanup: NA Percent Solid: 100% Date Analyzed: 9/21/2006 Extract Volume (µl): 2000 Instrument: El Camino Prep DF: 1.00 Operator: JAR Analysis DF: 1.00 Injection Volume (µl): 1.00 Batch QC: GO SB Analyte Concentration (mg/kg dry wt.) RL EDL Comments C1 - Phenanthrene/Anthracene U C2 - Phenanthrene/Anthracene U C3 - Phenanthrene/Anthracene U C4 - Phenanthrene/Anthracene U Dibenzothiophene % C1 - Dibenzothiophene U C2 - Dibenzothiophene U C3 - Dibenzothiophene U C4 - Dibenzothiophene U Benzo(b)naphtho(2,1-d)thiophene U Fluoranthene % Pyrene % C1 - Fluoranthene/Pyrene U C2 - Fluoranthene/Pyrene U C3 - Fluoranthene/Pyrene U Benz[a]anthracene % Chrysene* % C1 - Benz(a)anthracene/Chrysene U C2 - Benz(a)anthracene/Chrysene U C3 - Benz(a)anthracene/Chrysene U C4 - Benz(a)anthracene/Chrysene U Benzo[b]fluoranthene % Benzo[j/k]fluoranthene % Benzo(e)pyrene % Benzo[a]pyrene % Perylene U Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene % Dibenz[a,h]anthracene % Benzo[g,h,i]perylene % Coronene U Retene U Benzo(b/c)fluorenes U Methylpyrene U Methylpyrene U Methylpyrene U Heptadecane U Pristane U Octadecane U Phytane U /18/2006 UR xls
195 Analytical Results for Volatile and Semivolatile Organics META Environmental, Inc. Field ID: Soil Blank Spike Client: URS Corporation Preparation Method: EPA 3570 Project: NYSEG Auburn Cleanup Method(s): NA Analysis Method: EPA 8270M Lab ID GO SBS File ID: E D Matrix: Soil Preservation: None Date Sampled: NA Decanted: None Date Received: NA Date Prepared: 9/20/2006 Sample Size (g): 2.00 Date Cleanup: NA Percent Solid: 100% Date Analyzed: 9/21/2006 Extract Volume (µl): 2000 Instrument: El Camino Prep DF: 1.00 Operator: JAR Analysis DF: 1.00 Injection Volume (µl): 1.00 Batch QC: GO SB Analyte Concentration (mg/kg dry wt.) RL EDL Comments 2,6,10-trimethyldodecane U ,6,10-trimethyltridecane U Norpristane U Extraction Surrogate Recoveries (%) Limits Toluene-d Phenanthrene-d Perylene-d NA - Not applicable. B - Analyte detected in the Blank. J - Estimated value; detected between the RL and DL. U - Analyte not detected above DL. D - Analyte reported from a diluted extract. E - Estimate, result detected above calibration range. I - Concentration/Peak ID uncertain due to potential interference. RL - Reporting limit is the sample equivalent of the lowest linear calibration concentration. EDL - Estimated detection limit is 50% of RL. * - Triphenylene is known to coelute with this compound. 10/18/2006 UR xls
196 Analytical Results for Volatile and Semivolatile Organics META Environmental, Inc. Field ID: Duplicate of SED-21 (0-1) Client: URS Corporation Preparation Method: EPA 3570 Project: NYSEG Auburn Cleanup Method(s): NA Analysis Method: EPA 8270M Lab ID UR DUP File ID: E D Matrix: Soil Preservation: None Date Sampled: 9/19/2006 Decanted: None Date Received: 9/20/2006 Date Prepared: 9/20/2006 Sample Size (g): 2.05 Date Cleanup: NA Percent Solid: 85% Date Analyzed: 9/22/2006 Extract Volume (µl): 2000 Instrument: El Camino Prep DF: 1.00 Operator: JAR Analysis DF: 1.00 Injection Volume (µl): 1.00 Batch QC: GO SB Analyte Concentration (mg/kg dry wt.) RL EDL Comments MAH & PAH COMPOUNDS: RPD Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene m/p-xylenes Styrene o-xylene Isopropylbenzene J n-propylbenzene J ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene J ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene t-butylbenzene U NA sec-butylbenzene U NA p-isopropyltoluene n-butylbenzene C1 - Benzene C2 - Benzene C3 - Benzene C4 - Benzene C5 - Benzene trans-decalin U NA cis-decalin U NA Naphthalene Methylnaphthalene Methylnaphthalene C1 - Naphthalene C2 - Naphthalene C3- Naphthalene C4- Naphthalene Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene Dibenzofuran Fluorene C1 - Fluorene C2 - Fluorene C3 - Fluorene Phenanthrene Anthracene /18/2006 UR xls
197 Analytical Results for Volatile and Semivolatile Organics META Environmental, Inc. Field ID: Duplicate of SED-21 (0-1) Client: URS Corporation Preparation Method: EPA 3570 Project: NYSEG Auburn Cleanup Method(s): NA Analysis Method: EPA 8270M Lab ID UR DUP File ID: E D Matrix: Soil Preservation: None Date Sampled: 9/19/2006 Decanted: None Date Received: 9/20/2006 Date Prepared: 9/20/2006 Sample Size (g): 2.05 Date Cleanup: NA Percent Solid: 85% Date Analyzed: 9/22/2006 Extract Volume (µl): 2000 Instrument: El Camino Prep DF: 1.00 Operator: JAR Analysis DF: 1.00 Injection Volume (µl): 1.00 Batch QC: GO SB Analyte Concentration (mg/kg dry wt.) RL EDL Comments C1 - Phenanthrene/Anthracene C2 - Phenanthrene/Anthracene C3 - Phenanthrene/Anthracene C4 - Phenanthrene/Anthracene Dibenzothiophene C1 - Dibenzothiophene C2 - Dibenzothiophene C3 - Dibenzothiophene C4 - Dibenzothiophene Benzo(b)naphtho(2,1-d)thiophene Fluoranthene Pyrene C1 - Fluoranthene/Pyrene C2 - Fluoranthene/Pyrene C3 - Fluoranthene/Pyrene Benz[a]anthracene Chrysene* C1 - Benz(a)anthracene/Chrysene C2 - Benz(a)anthracene/Chrysene C3 - Benz(a)anthracene/Chrysene C4 - Benz(a)anthracene/Chrysene Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzo[j/k]fluoranthene Benzo(e)pyrene Benzo[a]pyrene Perylene Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene Dibenz[a,h]anthracene Benzo[g,h,i]perylene Coronene Retene Benzo(b/c)fluorenes Methylpyrene Methylpyrene Methylpyrene Heptadecane Pristane Octadecane Phytane /18/2006 UR xls
198 Analytical Results for Volatile and Semivolatile Organics META Environmental, Inc. Field ID: Duplicate of SED-21 (0-1) Client: URS Corporation Preparation Method: EPA 3570 Project: NYSEG Auburn Cleanup Method(s): NA Analysis Method: EPA 8270M Lab ID UR DUP File ID: E D Matrix: Soil Preservation: None Date Sampled: 9/19/2006 Decanted: None Date Received: 9/20/2006 Date Prepared: 9/20/2006 Sample Size (g): 2.05 Date Cleanup: NA Percent Solid: 85% Date Analyzed: 9/22/2006 Extract Volume (µl): 2000 Instrument: El Camino Prep DF: 1.00 Operator: JAR Analysis DF: 1.00 Injection Volume (µl): 1.00 Batch QC: GO SB Analyte Concentration (mg/kg dry wt.) RL EDL Comments 2,6,10-trimethyldodecane ,6,10-trimethyltridecane Norpristane Total PAH (16) Total PAH (42) Extraction Surrogate Recoveries (%) Limits Toluene-d Phenanthrene-d Perylene-d NA - Not applicable. B - Analyte detected in the Blank. J - Estimated value; detected between the RL and DL. U - Analyte not detected above DL. D - Analyte reported from a diluted extract. E - Estimate, result detected above calibration range. I - Concentration/Peak ID uncertain due to potential interference. RL - Reporting limit is the sample equivalent of the lowest linear calibration concentration. EDL - Estimated detection limit is 50% of RL. * - Triphenylene is known to coelute with this compound. 10/18/2006 UR xls
199 Appendix D Extended MAH/PAH Profiles Histograms
200 n-butylbenzene C1 - Benzene C2 - Benzene C3 - Benzene C4 - Benzene C5 - Benzene trans-decalin cis-decalin Fluoranthene Pyrene Chrysene* Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzo[j/k]fluoranthene Benzo(e)pyrene Benzo[a]pyrene Perylene Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene Dibenz[a,h]anthracene Benzo[g,h,i]perylene Coronene C3 - Benz(a)anthracene/Chrysene C4 - Benz(a)anthracene/Chrysene C1 - Benz(a)anthracene/Chrysene C2 - Benz(a)anthracene/Chrysene C2 - Fluoranthene/Pyrene C3 - Fluoranthene/Pyrene Benz[a]anthracene C1 - Fluoranthene/Pyrene Benzo(b)naphtho(2,1-d)thiophene C4 - Dibenzothiophene C2 - Dibenzothiophene C3 - Dibenzothiophene Dibenzothiophene C1 - Dibenzothiophene C3 - Phenanthrene/Anthracene C4 - Phenanthrene/Anthracene C1 - Phenanthrene/Anthracene C2 - Phenanthrene/Anthracene SED-21 (0-1) UR C2 - Naphthalene C3- Naphthalene C4- Naphthalene Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene Dibenzofuran Fluorene C1 - Fluorene C2 - Fluorene C3 - Fluorene Phenanthrene Anthracene 1-Methylnaphthalene C1 - Naphthalene Naphthalene 2-Methylnaphthalene sec-butylbenzene p-isopropyltoluene 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene t-butylbenzene Isopropylbenzene n-propylbenzene 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene Styrene o-xylene Ethylbenzene m/p-xylenes Benzene Toluene Concentration (mg/kg dry wt.)
201 n-butylbenzene C1 - Benzene C2 - Benzene C3 - Benzene C4 - Benzene C5 - Benzene trans-decalin cis-decalin Fluoranthene Pyrene Chrysene* Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzo[j/k]fluoranthene Benzo(e)pyrene Benzo[a]pyrene Perylene Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene Dibenz[a,h]anthracene Benzo[g,h,i]perylene Coronene C1 - Benz(a)anthracene/Chrysene C2 - Benz(a)anthracene/Chrysene C3 - Benz(a)anthracene/Chrysene C4 - Benz(a)anthracene/Chrysene C1 - Fluoranthene/Pyrene C2 - Fluoranthene/Pyrene C3 - Fluoranthene/Pyrene Benz[a]anthracene Benzo(b)naphtho(2,1-d)thiophene C4 - Dibenzothiophene C2 - Dibenzothiophene C3 - Dibenzothiophene Dibenzothiophene C1 - Dibenzothiophene C3 - Phenanthrene/Anthracene C4 - Phenanthrene/Anthracene C1 - Phenanthrene/Anthracene C2 - Phenanthrene/Anthracene SED-23 (0-1) UR C2 - Naphthalene C3- Naphthalene C4- Naphthalene Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene Dibenzofuran Fluorene C1 - Fluorene C2 - Fluorene C3 - Fluorene Phenanthrene Anthracene 1-Methylnaphthalene C1 - Naphthalene Naphthalene 2-Methylnaphthalene sec-butylbenzene p-isopropyltoluene 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene t-butylbenzene Styrene o-xylene Isopropylbenzene n-propylbenzene 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene m/p-xylenes Concentration (mg/kg dry wt.)
202 n-butylbenzene C1 - Benzene C2 - Benzene C3 - Benzene C4 - Benzene C5 - Benzene trans-decalin cis-decalin Fluoranthene Pyrene Chrysene* Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzo[j/k]fluoranthene Benzo(e)pyrene Benzo[a]pyrene Perylene Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene Dibenz[a,h]anthracene Benzo[g,h,i]perylene Coronene C3 - Benz(a)anthracene/Chrysene C4 - Benz(a)anthracene/Chrysene C1 - Benz(a)anthracene/Chrysene C2 - Benz(a)anthracene/Chrysene C2 - Fluoranthene/Pyrene C3 - Fluoranthene/Pyrene Benz[a]anthracene C1 - Fluoranthene/Pyrene Benzo(b)naphtho(2,1-d)thiophene C4 - Dibenzothiophene C2 - Dibenzothiophene C3 - Dibenzothiophene Dibenzothiophene C1 - Dibenzothiophene C3 - Phenanthrene/Anthracene C4 - Phenanthrene/Anthracene C1 - Phenanthrene/Anthracene C2 - Phenanthrene/Anthracene SED-26 (0-1) UR C2 - Naphthalene C3- Naphthalene C4- Naphthalene Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene Dibenzofuran Fluorene C1 - Fluorene C2 - Fluorene C3 - Fluorene Phenanthrene Anthracene 1-Methylnaphthalene C1 - Naphthalene Naphthalene 2-Methylnaphthalene sec-butylbenzene p-isopropyltoluene 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene t-butylbenzene Isopropylbenzene n-propylbenzene 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene Styrene o-xylene Ethylbenzene m/p-xylenes Benzene Toluene Concentration (mg/kg dry wt.)
203 Appendix E Extracted Ion Current Profiles (EICPs)
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
SITE ASSESSMENT FOR PROPOSED COKE POINT DREDGED MATERIAL CONTAINMENT FACILITY AT SPARROWS POINT BALTIMORE COUNTY, MARYLAND ATTACHMENT IV
SITE ASSESSMENT FOR PROPOSED COKE POINT DREDGED MATERIAL CONTAINMENT FACILITY AT SPARROWS POINT BALTIMORE COUNTY, MARYLAND ATTACHMENT IV Analytical Report Environmental Forensics for Soil and Sediment
APPENDIX C. DATA VALIDATION REPORT
APPENDIX C. DATA VALIDATION REPORT T-117 Upland Investigation Upland Investigation Data Report Appendices PROJECT NARRATIVE Basis for the Data Validation This report summarizes the results of the validation
NISTIR 7793. September 2011
NISTIR 7793 Interlaboratory Analytical Comparison Study to Support Deepwater Horizon Natural Resource Damage Assessment: Description and Results for Crude Oil QA1OIL1 Michele M. Schantz John R. Kucklick
Applications of forensic chemistry to environmental work
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol (2005) 32: 665 668 DOI 10.1007/s10295-005-0013-z SPECIAL TOPIC: BIODIVERSITY Diane L. Saber Æ David Mauro Æ Tanita Sirivedhin Applications of forensic chemistry to environmental
Environmental Forensics
Environmental Forensics N O T E S Volume 10 2011 CERCLA s Petroleum Exclusion and the Use of Chemical Forensic Methods Tarek Saba and Paul Boehm For more information on Exponent s environmental services,
The First Quantitative Analysis of Alkylated PAH and PASH by GCxGC/MS and its Implications on Weathering Studies
The First Quantitative Analysis of Alkylated PAH and PASH by GCxGC/MS and its Implications on Weathering Studies INEF Penn State Conference 2013 Albert Robbat, Jr. and Patrick Antle Tufts University, Chemistry
Appendix C Data Validation Report
Appendix C Data Validation Report INTRODUCTION Basis for the Data Validation This report summarizes the results of the summary (Level III) data validation performed on sediment, water, and quality control
Reference Materials for Environmental Performance Testing Dr Steve Wood Head of Regulatory and Legislative Services. ISPRA 25 June 2009
Reference Materials for Environmental Performance Testing Dr Steve Wood Head of Regulatory and Legislative Services ISPRA 25 June 2009 Outline Background to LGC UK MCERTS scheme Reference materials production
This study was performed by Patrick Sullivan and staff at TestAmerica Analytical Testing Corp., Westfield, MA, USA
An Automated Method for the Fractionation of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPH) from Water and Soil Extracts Using the Gilson GX-274 ASPEC System Keywords: Aliphatic Hydrocarbons, Aromatic Hydrocarbons,
Technical Report No.: 64.164.15.00188.01B. Rev. 00 Dated 2015-03-25. Parts of Ceiling Lamp and Parts of Spot Lamp
Technical Report No. 64.164.15.00188.01B Rev. 00 Dated 2015-03-25 Client: ZhongShan LiangYi Lighting CO.,LTD BeiHai Industrial Zone,GuZhen Town,ZhongShan,GuangDong,P.R.China Test Subject: Parts of Ceiling
Sensitive and Rapid Determination of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tap Water
Sensitive and Rapid Determination of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Tap Water Chen Jing, 1 Dai Zhenyu, 1 Xu Qun, 1 Liang Lina, 1 and Jeffrey Rohrer 2 1 Thermo Fisher Scientific, Shanghai, People s
Water Column Monitoring, Condition Monitoring 2011
Water Column Monitoring, Condition Monitoring 211 Bjørn Einar Grøsvik 1, Eirin Kalstveit, Li Liu, Guri Nesje, Kjell Westrheim, Marc H.G. Berntssen 2, Pål Olsvik 2, Jeremie Le Goff 3, Sonnich Meier 1 1)
Forensic Fingerprinting Petroleum Contaminants using UVF Field Screening Technology
Forensic Fingerprinting Petroleum Contaminants using UVF Field Screening Technology Grand Calumet River and Lake Michigan Steve Greason, Speaker Sitelab Corporation Technical Session (Frio): Environmental
Test Report No. PAL08-54203-1e/sac Altenberge, 21.11.2008. Test of glassware. Sample Entry: 24.07.2008 19.09.2008 (re-test material)
Test Report No. PAL08-54203-1e/sac Altenberge, 21.11.2008 Test of glassware Sample Entry: 24.07.2008 19.09.2008 (re-test material) Client: Lock & Lock, Seoul Order: 24.07.2008 23.09.2008 (re-test material)
METHOD 8310 POLYNUCLEAR AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS
METHOD 8310 POLYNUCLEAR AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS 1.0 SCOPE AND APPLICATION 1.1 Method 8310 is used to determine the concentration of certain polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in ground water and wastes.
Certifications: New York (EPA: NY00906, ELAP: 11078), New Jersey (NY026), Connecticut (PH-0337), Massachusetts (M-NY906), Virginia (1884)
Pace Analytical e-report *Issuance of this report is prior to full data package. Report prepared for: ARCADIS 6723 TOWPATH RD SYRACUSE, NY 324 CONTACT: DON SAUDA ----------------------------------------------
E T 2006. µ (PAHs), 2006.
75 E T 2006.,.,.,.,.,., µ µ µµ ( ) µ µ 2006., µ µ (PAHs), µ (PCBs) µ. µ µ, 1,5 km µ µ µ µ. µ ap;o µµ. 1. µ µ µ µ,. µ µ µ µµ ( ) µ 2006., µ µ (PAHs), µ (PCBs) µ. µ µµ, µ µµ, µ µ. 76 2. 2.1 µ.1., µ µ µ,
Pace Analytical e-report
Date Issued: July 28, 2014 Pace Analytical e-report Report prepared for: ATLANTIC TESTING LABORATORIES, LTD 22 CORPORATE DR CLIFTON PARK, NY 12065 CONTACT: Derek Converse ----------------------------------------------
CCME. Reference Method for the Canada- Wide Standard for Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil - Tier 1 Method
CCME Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment Le Conseil canadien des ministres de l environnement Reference Method for the Canada- Wide Standard for Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil - Tier 1 Method
FINE PARTICLE EMISSION PROFILE FOR ROAD DUST IN PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA
17PB-1 FINE PARTICLE EMISSION PROFILE FOR ROAD DUST IN PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA ALLEN L. ROBINSON*, Eric M. Lipsky, Natalie Pekney, Leonard Lucas, David Wynne Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Sorbents. [ A] [ A] aq. Strong affinity = large K D. Digital chromatography: all-or. or-nothing LC mechanism to extremes K =
Theory of SPE 1 SPE Nonequilibrium,, exhaustive removal of chemical constituents from a flowing liquid sample via retention on a contained solid sorbent and subsequent recovery of selected constituents
METHOD 550. July 1990. J.W. Hodgeson. W.J. Bashe (Technology Applications Inc.) T.V. Baker (Technology Applications Inc.)
METHOD 550 DETERMINATION OF POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS IN DRINKING WATER BY LIQUID-LIQUID EXTRACTION AND HPLC WITH COUPLED ULTRAVIOLET AND FLUORESCENCE DETECTION July 1990 J.W. Hodgeson W.J. Bashe
Methods 8260C and 8270D on a Single GCMS without Changing Columns
Gas Chromatograph Mass Spectrometer No. GCMS-1302 Methods 8260C and 8270D on a Single GCMS without Changing Columns Introduction USEPA Methods 8260C (volatile) and 8270D (semi-volatile) typically require
One sample of Lineplus Powerline 2300 Highlighter (Orange-Blue-Yellow-Green-Pink) BUYER :
Page 1 of 28 TEST REPOR REPORT NUMBER : TURA110108041 APPLICANT NAME TETAŞ Đç Ve Dış Ticaret A.Ş. ADDRESS Çakmaklı Mah. Hadımköy Yolu 50. Sokak No: 2 Kıraç Büyükçekmece - Đstanbul FAX NO : 0212 381 63
"REACH for Coal Chemicals (R4CC)" REACH UVCB Categories and Specifications
Coal Tar EN ISO 2719 DIN 52027 ASTM D4052 [g/cm³] > 10% Tar, coal, high-temp. The condensation product obtained by cooling, to approximately ambient temperature, the gas evolved in the high temperature
PROTOCOL NO. 5: Petroleum Hydrocarbon Analytical Methods and Standards
PROTOCOL FOR THE CONTAMINATED SITES REGULATION UNDER THE ENVIRONMENT ACT PROTOCOL NO. 5: Petroleum Hydrocarbon Analytical Methods and Standards Prepared pursuant to Part 6 Administration, Section 21, Contaminated
Umur Kırtasiye San. ve Tic. AŞ. Neslihan Sözer Chemical Laboratory Manager
TEST REPOR Page 1 of 10 REPORT NUMBER : TURA120094942- REVISED I APPLICANT NAME ADDRESS Umur Kırtasiye San. ve Tic. AŞ. Esenkent Mah. Dudullu Org. San. Böl. 2. Cd No:5 34776 Ümraniye İstanbul TÜRKİYE FAX
Test Report No. 440591
Applicant : AceCamp GmbH Neugasse 18 DE 63075 Offenbach/Main Attention : Sven Jungblut Test Sample : Received on 12.09.2013 StoriX ID : 134922 Test Period : From 13.09.2013 to 24.09.2013 Sample Description
Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbon Fractions Using the ETPH Analytical Method and Criteria Development TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT
Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbon Fractions Using the ETPH Analytical Method and Development TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection Connecticut Department
11.1 Hot Mix Asphalt Plants. 11.1.1 General
11.1 Hot Mix Asphalt Plants 1-3,23, 392-394 11.1.1 General Hot mix asphalt (HMA) paving materials are a mixture of size-graded, high quality aggregate (which can include reclaimed asphalt pavement [RAP]),
110108047* TEST REPOR. TETAŞ Đç Ve Dış Ticaret A.Ş. Page 1 of 26 APPLICANT NAME
TEST REPOR Page 1 of 26 REPORT NUMBER : TURA110108047 APPLICANT NAME ADDRESS TETAŞ Đç Ve Dış Ticaret A.Ş. Çakmaklı Mah. Hadımköy Yolu 50. Sokak No: 2 Kıraç Büyükçekmece - Đstanbul FAX NO : 0212 381 63
Aliphatic/Aromatic Separation of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Solids or Water by Silica gel Fractionation
ANALYTICAL METHOD 7 FOR CONTAMINATED SITES Aliphatic/Aromatic Separation of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Solids or Water by Silica gel Fractionation Prepared pursuant to Section 64 of the Contaminated
Draft Data Validation Plan Review Form Tier II
Draft Data Validation Plan Review Form Tier II This Plan Review Form is # of forms completed in the review of this closure plan. Facility Name ID Number Date Review of Report is Completed Validator/DO
APPENDIX II TIER I CHECKLIST
APPENDIX II TIER I CHECKLIST Data Validation PRF - Tier I Page 1 Data Validation Plan Review Form Tier I This Plan Review Form is # 1 of 1 forms completed in the review of this closure plan. Facility Name
SCREEN FOR THE PRESENCE OF POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS IN SELECT SEAFOODS USING LC-FLUORESCENCE
Page 1 of 39 SCREEN FOR THE PRESENCE OF POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS IN SELECT SEAFOODS USING LC-FLUORESCENCE Samuel Gratz 1*, Angela Mohrhaus 1, Bryan Gamble 1, Jill Gracie 1, David Jackson 1, John
Third Party Data Validation: What you need to know and do!
Third Party Data Validation: What you need to know and do! Anand Mudambi & Pamela Wehrmann 2012 DoD EMDQ Workshop San Diego, CA Course Objectives/Outline The course will provide an overview of third party
110108044* TEST REPOR. TETAŞ Đç Ve Dış Ticaret A.Ş. Page 1 of 19 APPLICANT NAME
TEST REPOR Page 1 of 19 REPORT NUMBER : APPLICANT NAME ADDRESS SAMPLE DESCRIPTION : BUYER : TURA110108044 TETAŞ Đç Ve Dış Ticaret A.Ş. Çakmaklı Mah. Hadımköy Yolu 50. Sokak No: 2 Kıraç Büyükçekmece - Đstanbul
Table of Contents. Glossary of Terms 5
Table of Contents Page Glossary of Terms 5 Section 1. Introduction 1.1 Purpose. 8 1.2 Applicability.. 8 1.3 Implementation Schedule.. 9 1.4 Overview of Guidance 10 2. Free Product and Oil Saturated Soil
State Water Resources Control Board Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program
State Water Resources Control Board Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program P.O. Box 100, Floor 24 850 Marina Bay Parkway, Build. P 500 N Central Ave, Suite 500 Sacramento, CA 95812-0100 Richmond,
Evaluation of Petroleum Hydrocarbon Methodologies Utilized by the Massachusetts DEP to Assess Potential Exposure in Vapor Intrusion Investigations
Evaluation of Petroleum Hydrocarbon Methodologies Utilized by the Massachusetts DEP to Assess Potential Exposure in Vapor Intrusion Investigations Andy Rezendes Alpha Analytical, Inc. Monday, August 15
San Mateo County Environmental Health Characterization and Reuse of Petroleum Hydrocarbon Impacted Soil
INTRODUCTION San Mateo County Environmental Health Characterization and Reuse of Petroleum Hydrocarbon Impacted Soil This guidance relates to the on-site reuse of non-hazardous petroleum hydrocarbon impacted
Samples RMN070714. Analytical Report (0714-63) GC/FID Analysis (RM01) Nicotine Purity
For the benefit of VaporFi, Inc. Samples RMN070714 Analytical Report (0714-63) GC/FID Analysis (RM01) Nicotine Purity GC/MS Analysis (QG02) Anabasine, Anatabine, Myosmine, Nornicotine Enthalpy Analytical,
Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act Ministry of the Environment April 15, 2011
Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act Ministry of the Environment April 15, 2011 PIBS # 7382e01 i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS...ii
No Smoke, No Fire, No Hazard Firefighters Perspective on the Hazards of Fire Overhaul and How to Protect Against Them
No Smoke, No Fire, No Hazard Firefighters Perspective on the Hazards of Fire Overhaul and How to Protect Against Them Dawn Bolstad-Johnson, MPH, CIH, CSP Overview The insults of smoke and fire are well
Bioremediation of contaminated soil. Dr. Piyapawn Somsamak Department of Environmental Science Kasetsart University
Bioremediation of contaminated soil Dr. Piyapawn Somsamak Department of Environmental Science Kasetsart University Outline Process description In situ vs ex situ bioremediation Intrinsic biodegradation
A Comparison of EPA Methods 8260B and TO-14A/15 for the analysis of VOCs in Soil Gas: Application to Upward Vapor Intrusion Risk Studies
A Comparison of EPA Methods 8260B and TO-14A/15 for the analysis of VOCs in Soil Gas: Application to Upward Vapor Intrusion Risk Studies Paper #41 James E. Picker, Ph.D., H&P Mobile GeoChemistry 148 South
Determination of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) in Food with GC-MS/MS
Determination of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) in Food with GC-MS/MS Thorsten Bernsmann, Peter Fürst Chemical and Veterinary Analytical Institute Münsterland-Emscher-Lippe Joseph-König-Str. 40,
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN MASSPORT AIR QUALITY MONITORING STUDY, YEAR 2 LOGAN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN MASSPORT AIR QUALITY MONITORING STUDY, YEAR 2 LOGAN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Prepared for Massport Capital Programs - Environmental Management Logan Office Center One Harborside
Chemistry 321, Experiment 8: Quantitation of caffeine from a beverage using gas chromatography
Chemistry 321, Experiment 8: Quantitation of caffeine from a beverage using gas chromatography INTRODUCTION The analysis of soft drinks for caffeine was able to be performed using UV-Vis. The complex sample
Introduction. The following definitions may help you better understand the components of the data report.
Introduction This document is designed to help our clients understand the quality control requirements and limitations of data reporting. There are three sections to this document. The first section will
APPENDIX L DATA VALIDATION REPORT
APPENDIX L DATA VALIDATION REPORT FIELD AND DATA REPORT DOWNTOWN PORTLAND SEDIMENT CHARACTERIZATION PHASE II WILLAMETTE RIVER PORTLAND, OREGON JUNE 2010 Data Validation Report Downtown Portland Sediment
METHOD 9075 TEST METHOD FOR TOTAL CHLORINE IN NEW AND USED PETROLEUM PRODUCTS BY X-RAY FLUORESCENCE SPECTROMETRY (XRF)
METHOD 9075 TEST METHOD FOR TOTAL CHLORINE IN NEW AND USED PETROLEUM PRODUCTS BY X-RAY FLUORESCENCE SPECTROMETRY (XRF) 1.0 SCOPE AND APPLICATION 1.1 This test method covers the determination of total chlorine
Step-by-Step Analytical Methods Validation and Protocol in the Quality System Compliance Industry
Step-by-Step Analytical Methods Validation and Protocol in the Quality System Compliance Industry BY GHULAM A. SHABIR Introduction Methods Validation: Establishing documented evidence that provides a high
Ackrediteringens omfattning / Scope of Accreditation ALS Scandinavia AB, Täby. Kemiska analyser/chemical analysis. Bilaga/ Appendix 2
2014-06-18 2013/3629 1(1) Kemiska analyser/chemical analysis Alkalinitet Alcanility SS-EN ISO 9963-2, utg 1 Titrimetri/ Titrimetric 1:1,2 0,01-4 mekv/l Färg Colour Konduktivitet Conductivity SS-EN ISO
Determination of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Water and Sediments of the Kor River, Iran
Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 0 (): 0-07, 20 ISSN 990-9233 IDOSI Publications, 20 Determination of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Water and Sediments of the Kor River, Iran 2 Farshid
Fast Continuous Online Analysis of VOCs in Ambient Air using Agilent 5975T LTM GC/MSD and Markes TD
Fast Continuous Online Analysis of VOCs in Ambient Air using Agilent 5975T LTM GC/MSD and Markes TD Application Note Environmental Author Xiaohua Li Agilent Technologies (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. 412 Ying Lun
Coke Manufacturing. Industry Description and Practices. Waste Characteristics
Pollution Prevention and Abatement Handbook WORLD BANK GROUP Effective July 1998 Coke Manufacturing Industry Description and Practices Coke and coke by-products, including coke oven gas, are produced by
Health Consultation. Airborne Chemicals from Wood Treatment Chemical WILLIAM C. MEREDITH COMPANY, INCORPORATED EAST POINT, FULTON COUNTY, GEORGIA
Health Consultation Airborne Chemicals from Wood Treatment Chemical WILLIAM C. MEREDITH COMPANY, INCORPORATED EAST POINT, FULTON COUNTY, GEORGIA EPA FACILITY ID: GAD003323805 SEPTEMBER 29, 2004 U.S. DEPARTMENT
Holcim EMR List of EN Standards and VDI Guidelines usable for Discontinuous Measurements in Cement Plants
Holcim EMR List of EN Standards and VDI Guidelines usable for Discontinuous Measurements in Cement Plants Version 2004-01 / August 2004 (HGRS-JW-04-25s) HGRS-CTS/MT J. Waltisberg SUMMARY ( ) shall not
ANALYTICAL SUMMARY REPORT
ANALYTICAL SUMMARY REPORT OST-003 August 06, 2015 PO Box 2003 Rapid City, SD 57709 Work Order: Project Name: G15070702 Energy Laboratories Inc. Gillette WY received the following 2 samples for on 7/31/2015
Analytical Data Package Reports
Analytical Data Package Reports TriMatrix offers a variety of analytical data packages formatted to meet the reporting needs and varying data quality objectives of its clients. The data packages offered
A Study on the Variability of Fresh Diesel from Service Station in Kota Bharu Using GC-MS and PCA
A Study on the Variability of Fresh Diesel from Service Station in Kota Bharu Using GC-MS and PCA Muhammad Suffian Azah, Ahmad Fahmi Lim Abdullah a a Forensic Science Programme, School of Health Sciences,
DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND DATA USABILITY EVALUATION TECHNICAL GUIDANCE
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Site Remediation Program DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND DATA USABILITY EVALUATION TECHNICAL GUIDANCE Version 1.0 April 2014 Preamble The results of analyses
Laboratory Data Management. August 2011
Laboratory Data Management and Reporting Mid-Atlantic ti EQuIS Users Group Meeting August 2011 Company Information Founded d 1986 Employee-owned since 1997 Laboratories Six Service Centers Two Total Staff
This study was performed in collaboration with CT Laboratories of Baraboo, WI, USA.
Automated Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC) Clean-up of Soil Extracts Prior to Analysis for Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS (USEPA Method 8270) Keywords: Automated GX-271 GPC Clean-up System,
Persistent, Bioaccumulative, and Toxic Chemicals A Printer s Roadmap
Persistent, Bioaccumulative, and Toxic Chemicals A Printer s Roadmap By: Gary A. Jones Graphic Arts Technical Foundation Introduction and Background EPA s activities surrounding the development of regulations
1 Quality Assurance and Quality Control Project Plan
1 Quality Assurance and Quality Control Project Plan The purpose of this section is to describe the quality assurance/quality control program that will be used during the system specific field testing
The purpose of this bid is to procure a contract with a laboratory to provide analytical testing services on an as-needed basis.
Page 1 of 11 1. GENERAL The purpose of this bid is to procure a contract with a laboratory to provide analytical testing services on an as-needed basis. Special consideration may be given to laboratories
Sample Management SOP 2v8 Page 1 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 2 SAMPLE MANAGEMENT REVISION LOG. Revision Number Description Date
Sample Management SOP 2v8 Page 1 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 2 SAMPLE MANAGEMENT REVISION LOG Revision Number Description Date 2.0 Original SOP 2.1 Revisions by McLemore after field testing 1/3/04
New York State Brownfield Cleanup Program Development of Soil Cleanup Objectives. Technical Support Document
New York State Brownfield Cleanup Program Development of Soil Cleanup Objectives Technical Support Document Prepared By: New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and New York State Department
LEACHING CHARACTERISTICS OF ASPHALT ROAD WASTE
LEACHING CHARACTERISTICS OF ASPHALT ROAD WASTE June 1998 Timothy G. Townsend University Of Florida State University System of Florida FLORIDA CENTER FOR SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT 2207 NW 13
Emission Testing February 2015 LMS Energy Pty Ltd - Jilliby Plant
Page: 1 of 6 1/132 Ross Court Cleveland QLD 4163 Emission Testing February 2015 - Jilliby Plant Dear Nathan McClelland, Tests were performed 11 February 2015 to determine emissions to air from Unit 1 at
Guidelines For Using and Generating Write-On Data Files
Guidelines For Using and Generating Write-On Data Files Drinking Water Program California Department of Health Services January 1999 The DHS Drinking Water Program (DWP) provides Write-On to public drinking
APPENDIX F Data Validation Program Memorandum
APPENDIX F Data Validation Program Memorandum 2100 Main Street, Suite 150 Huntington Beach, California 92648 GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS (714) 969-0800 Fax (714) 969-0820 M E M O R A N D U M TO: cc: FROM: Brian
Site Assessment for the Proposed Coke Point Dredged Material Containment Facility at Sparrows Point
Site Assessment for the Proposed Coke Point Dredged Material Containment Facility at Sparrows Point Prepared for Maryland Port Administration 2310 Broening Highway Baltimore, MD 21224 (410) 631-1022 Maryland
DMA-1 Direct Mercury Analyzer
DMA-1 Direct Mercury Analyzer www.milestonesrl.com MILESTONE H E L P I N G C H E M I S T S 8 good reasons to choose the milestone DmA-1 1. no sample preparation 2. ease of use 3. lowest cost of analysis
2013 Rhode Island Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Remediation General Permit
2013 Rhode Island Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Remediation General Permit Effective Date: October 1, 2013 Expiration Date: September 30, 2018 Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT. iii. Also contributing to the preparation of this document is Tahir Khan of Chemical Emission Management Services of Ontario, Canada
!"## DISCLAIMER As the Environmental Protection Agency has indicated in Emission Inventory Improvement Program (EIIP) documents, the choice of methods to be used to estimate emissions depends on how the
How To Analyze Pesticide Levels In Lemon Oil
AppNote 9/2006 Target GC-MS Analysis using Accelerated Column Heating and Interactive Deconvolution Software Albert Robbat Tufts University, Chemistry Department, Medford, MA 02155, USA Andreas Hoffmann
Multi-elemental determination of gasoline using Agilent 5100 ICP-OES with oxygen injection and a temperature controlled spray chamber
Multi-elemental determination of gasoline using Agilent 5100 ICP-OES with oxygen injection and a temperature controlled spray chamber Application note Energy & chemicals, petrochemicals Authors Elizabeth
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION DIVISION OF SPILL PREVENTION AND RESPONSE CONTAMINATED SITES REMEDIATION PROGRAM GUIDANCE FOR CLEANUP OF PETROLEUM CONTAMINATED SITES 1 2 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...
Jan T. Andersson a & Christine Achten b a Institute of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, University of
This article was downloaded by: [Institut Fuer Tierernaehrung/Fli] On: 18 June 2015, At: 09:28 Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered
R.T. CORPORATION. Sediments, Soils and Sludge Inorganic and Organic Samples Specialty Catalog
R.T. CORPORATION Sediments, Soils and Sludge Inorganic and Organic Samples Specialty Catalog R.T. Corporation P.O. Box 9 Soldier Springs Rd Laramie, WY Orders:+ () Fax:+ () 9 [email protected] www.onlinecas.com
Country Club Ichthycide. LESSON 3 Parts per Million Adapted from, Investigating Groundwater: The Fruitvale Story
Country Club Ichthycide LESSON 3 Parts per Million Adapted from, Investigating Groundwater: The Fruitvale Story TEACHER NOTE: Omit this lesson if students have a working knowledge of ppm. Overview Students
SOME ASPECTS OF THE USE OF PY GC MS TO INVESTIGATE THE COMPOSITION OF THE AROMATIC FRACTION OF HARD COAL PYROLYSATES
ACTA CHROMATOGRAPHICA, NO. 14, 2004 SOME ASPECTS OF THE USE OF PY GC MS TO INVESTIGATE THE COMPOSITION OF THE AROMATIC FRACTION OF HARD COAL PYROLYSATES A. Matuszewska Department of Geochemistry, Mineralogy
How To Test For Contamination In Large Volume Water
Automated Solid Phase Extraction (SPE) of EPA Method 1694 for Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products in Large Volume Water Samples Keywords Application Note ENV0212 This collaboration study was performed
