2013 Customer Satisfaction Survey Long Island Rail Road



Similar documents
2012 Customer Satisfaction Survey Subway

2007 Annual Performance Review of The MTA and Its Operating Agencies

Customer Satisfaction Index 2014

Improving Customer Experience: An Enterprise-wide Approach for the CTA. Ken G Kabira KGKabira@aol.com

Get Connected with Metro-North

REQUEST FOR EXPRESSION OF INTEREST PL0212 On-The-Go Digital Travel Station Reply Due Date: March 22, 2012

2014 BART Customer Satisfaction Study. BART Marketing and Research Department Corey, Canapary & Galanis Research

Los Angeles Metro Rapid


NEW JERSEY TRANSIT South Jersey Bus Study

June Service Quality Performance Report 2014

Chapter 4. Public Transit Services, Taxis and Community Transportation Services

Long Island Rail Road

ROUTE OVERVIEW. Comprehensive Route Evaluation ROUTE 3 WARWICK AVE

Passenger Charter Annual Progress Report April 2010 March 2011

New Public Transit Inspectors RAIL SAFETY AND SECURITY EXCELLENCE AWARDS PROGRAM 2013 EDITION RAIL SAFETY AWARDS CATEGORY

He said three of seven subway tunnels under the East River that were flooded by the storm had been cleared. New York subway silence may linger

MTA Capital Program

March 2015 Prepared by the Department of Finance & Performance Management Regional Peer Review PERFORMANCE MEASURES

AN ILLUSTRATION OF COMPARATIVE QUANTITATIVE RESULTS USING ALTERNATIVE ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES

Customer Charter Audit Quarter

This document is part of a series of Building a Stronger South Australia policy initiatives from the Government of South Australia.

8K. Market Segmentation of CTA Rail Customer Satisfaction Findings. Chart 8.12 CTA Customer Overall Satisfaction with Service

2008 TTC OPERATING BUDGET

3.2 Our customers and users tell us that they want four things:

Chapter 6. Major Destinations and Activity Centers

MARIN TRANSIT 2008 Systemwide Onboard Survey

GREATER MEADOWLANDS. Transit Guide. HARMON MEADOW & MILL CREEK in SECAUCUS NJ TRANSIT Bus, Rail & Light Rail Service. njtransit.com Google Translate

Metropolitan Transportation Authority Annual Report. Pursuant to New York Public Authorities Law Section 2800

Emirates Customer Satisfaction Survey Q2 2013/14 (July 2013-September 2013)

Impact of Hurricane Ike

Customer Satisfaction Survey Results

Enterprise Asset Management

WEST YORKSHIRE BUS STRATEGY

Twenty Year Capital Needs Assessment. September 16, 2013 Briefing to CPOC

PROPOSAL EVALUATION WORKSHEET (INDIVIDUAL) EVALUATION FACTOR: CUSTOMER SERVICE PLAN (RATED) Selection Committee

Security Strategy: A Layered Approach. Anthony Mercogliano Metropolitan Transportation Authority Assistant Director of Security New York, NY

Transdev Melbourne Customer Service Charter. ptv.vic.gov.au

Service You Can Count On: An Inside Look at How the MTA Invests to Move Customers Safely and Reliably..info

By Karla Karash March 18 18,

Metro Met..,.u... T,...,...,...,

Smarter Cities: Accessible Transportation

2013 Annual Service Plan Five year Service Plan Updates

GENERAL INFORMATION. IAEA Symposium on Isotopes in Hydrology, Marine Ecosystems, and Climate Change Studies in Monaco. Monaco, 27 March - 1 April 2011

Table 10-1 Travel Times Between Stations OPERATING & MAINTENANCE PLAN

Metrolinx / GO Transit Accessible Customer Service Policy for Implementation of the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, 2005 (AODA)

Customer Service and Operations Committee. Board Information Item IV-B. December 3, 2015

How to use your go card on the TransLink network. TransLink go card user guide

Metropolitan Transportation Authority Annual Report. Pursuant to New York Public Authorities Law Section 2800

Integrated Public Transport Service Planning Guidelines. Sydney Metropolitan Area

Case Study: Ameren and Text Message Alerts

COMMUNICATION DURING DISASTER RESPONSE AND RECOVERY

Impact of Reliability Centered Maintenance Program

Customer Charter.


MTA Storm Performance Review. June 2011

Presto Fare Card ibus (Automated Stop Announcements, Cameras) Transit Operating System Replacement

Lead Member: Councillor Roger Horton, Rail and Metro

Chaikin Analytics for ipad v1.3.1

National Passenger Survey Autumn 2012 Main Report

Energy Tariffs and Associated Charges

Capital Metro. Strategic Planning & Operational Analysis. Integrating Market Research

Ladies and Gentlemen: This Is Not a Drill.

GROWTH & INVESTMENT PLAN. September, 2007

3. TRANSIT SERVICES 3.1 BUSES

Queens Midtown Tunnel Repair, Restoration, Rehabilitation Projects. Manhattan Community Board 6 Transportation Committee - June 2, 2014

Climate Adaptation Planning in New York City

1 FIXED ROUTE OVERVIEW

Must read news for all train customers.

Exhibit Book Metro-North Railroad Committee Meeting 3/23/2015. Table of Contents: April 26 Schedule Change - Page 2

Project: mticketing for Commuter Rail and Ferry Services

London Underground Ticketing Metrics Qualitative debrief

TRAIN WRAPS TIMETABLE ADS TICKETS STATION POSTERS METROLINK MATTERS NEWSLETTER STATION SAMPLING WEBSITE: METROLINKTRAINS.COM

PACKS by Milestones MONTHLY MANAGEMENT Prices from 600/month

Keeping New York On Track: The Importance of the MTA Transit Network in a Changing World

Amtrak Marketing & Advertising Update

PROPOSAL EVALUATION WORKSHEET (INDIVIDUAL) EVALUATION FACTOR: TRANSPORTATION SERVICES PLAN (RATED) SRC INDIVIDUAL EVALUATION TJB

Transit Service Assessment

2014 SFMTA Transit Fleet Management Plan March 2014

Travel and subsistence policy

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Travel Policies

News Service. The new DB: Satisfied customers for a successful future. The details of DB's customer and quality campaign

Appendix F: GRAND RIVER TRANSIT ACCESSIBILITY PLAN Accessibility Plan

Continuing Client Focus

New York Office Visitors Guide A helpful guide for those planning to visit the New York Office of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP

July Board of Directors Briefing Materials. July 10, NNEPRA Office 75 West Commercial Street Suite 104 Portland, Maine 04101

Heathrow Express Operating Company Disabled People s Protection Policy

FREDericksburg Regional Transit (FRED) REAL-TIME SCHEDULING SOFTWARE, BUS STOP ANNUNCIATOR AND TRANSIT WEBSITE PROCUREMENT

Fare Change 2014 Frequently Asked Questions & Answers

Fiscal Year 2015 Quarter 4 April - June 2015 Stephanie Pollack Secretary & CEO

NASSAU COUNTY OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER

Service Quality Performance Report 2013

New York Resource Guide

Cost and Financial Analysis

SEPTA Customer Service Program Report

APPENDIX XII: EMERGENCY SUPPORT FUNCTION 12 - ENERGY

Washington State Transportation Commission Ferry Customer Survey

MINUTES GATEWAY CITIES SERVICE SECTOR COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority

State Of Wisconsin Department of Military Affairs

Miami-Dade Transit Service Standards

Transcription:

2013 Customer Satisfaction Survey Long Island Rail Road

Fares increased in March 2013. Overall Context Superstorm Sandy caused extensive damage, especially along the South Shore. The railroad continues to experience lingering operational effects from the storm. The Port Jefferson Branch experienced higher-than-normal signal and track outages prior to survey. Port Washington customer satisfaction continues to benefit from 2012 service restorations, with the highest branch score in 2013.

Key Findings Overall customer satisfaction declined slightly to 84% in 2013 from 86% in 2012. Overall satisfaction with Penn Station continues to decline, 83% in 2013 vs. 84% in 2012. Performance of frontline employees with 90% satisfaction continues among the top rated scores. The Overall Boarding Station score of 88% was relatively high and stayed unchanged from 2012. Station restroom scores decreased. LIRR has five (5) restroom renovations scheduled. We will monitor the impact of expanded waiting room hours on restroom wear and tear. LIRR is launching a new customer ambassador program to improve customer service at Penn Station, Atlantic Terminal and Jamaica Station.

LIRR Overall Customer Satisfaction LIRR Overall Train Service Overall 84% 86% 20% 21% 78% 84% 86% 17% 23% 24% 79% 20% 64% 65% 60% 60% 62% 60% 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 Top Area = Very Satisfied Bottom Area = Satisfied

LIRR Overall Customer Satisfaction By Time Period Peak Reverse Peak Weekday Off-Peak Weekend Off-Peak 88% 89% 88% 86% 87% 90% 90% 83% 77% 80% 72% 30% 25% 22% 23% 18% 29% 27% 10% 12% 18% 9% 81% 26% 67% 68% 64% 70% 63% 59% 64% 64% 65% 61% 63% 55% 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 Top Area = Very Satisfied Bottom Area = Satisfied

Overall Satisfaction By Branch 2013 2012 2011 Port Washington 88% 90% 78% Oyster Bay 87% 79% 80% Hempstead 87% 87% 85% West Hempstead 86% 84% 67% Montauk 84% 89% 81% Ronkonkoma (Electric) 83% 80% 79% Long Beach 83% 90% 59% Huntington 82% 86% 79% Babylon 82% 84% 77% Far Rockaway 81% 87% 80% Port Jefferson 73% 90% 85%

LIRR Train Service On-Time Performance Overall Schedule Of Trains Availability of Seats Value for the Money Using the Railroad 82% 84% 79% 79% 80% 75% 78% 79% 76% 27% 27% 24% 23% 22% 19% 25% 25% 25% 59% 62% 56% 16% 16% 14% 56% 57% 55% 57% 57% 57% 53% 54% 52% 44% 46% 42% 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 Top Area = Very Satisfied Bottom Area = Satisfied

LIRR Employees Overall Courtesy and Responsiveness Train Conductors Ticket Sellers 90% 91% 90% 92% 93% 92% 88% 90% 87% 38% 37% 33% 42% 41% 39% 37% 36% 35% 53% 54% 57% 50% 52% 53% 51% 53% 53% 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 Top Area = Very Satisfied Bottom Area = Satisfied

Penn Station Terminal and Boarding Stations Penn Station Overall Home Boarding Station 82% 84% 83% 88% 88% 86% 23% 22% 21% 30% 30% 28% 59% 62% 62% 58% 58% 58% 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 Top Area = Very Satisfied Bottom Area = Satisfied

LIRR Boarding Station Audio Announcements During Service Disruptions 73% 24% 71% 22% 69% 21% Electronic/LED Signs with Train Schedules 89% 91% 89% Cleanliness of Platforms & Shelters Cleanliness of Track Area Around the Station 81% 81% 81% 81% 81% 79% 40% 40% 38% 26% 26% 24% 25% 25% 22% 49% 51% 55% 55% 57% 56% 56% 57% 48% 48% 50% 50% 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 Top Area = Very Satisfied Bottom Area = Satisfied

LIRR On-Board Conditions Train Interior Cleanliness Cleanliness of Restrooms Physical Condition of Restrooms Train Interior Maintenance 80% 80% 79% 85% 86% 85% 20% 21% 20% 56% 59% 57% 12% 13% 13% 59% 13% 62% 62% 14% 12% 26% 26% 26% 59% 59% 59% 44% 46% 45% 46% 49% 49% 59% 60% 59% 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 Top Area = Very Satisfied Bottom Area = Satisfied

LIRR Customer Communication Overall Communication Normal Service Unplanned Service Disruptions Planned Service Changes 83% 84% 21% 22% 79% 18% 86% 87% 84% 23% 23% 20% 71% 71% 66% 80% 82% 79% 19% 17% 15% 21% 21% 19% 62% 62% 61% 63% 64% 64% 49% 59% 61% 59% 46% 49% 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 Top Area = Very Satisfied Bottom Area = Satisfied

Appendix Methodology Full Set of Attribute Ratings

Methodology The LIRR survey used an onboard distribution methodology among a sample of trains A total of 7,226 surveys were completed and tabulated, as follows: (Insert 5/20-24, 6/3-6, Table) LIRR Survey Total AM Peak Off-Peak Reverse Peak Completed Surveys 7,226 3,949 2,705 572 Survey dates 5/20-24, 6/3-6, 6/10-13, 6/15-16 6/10-12 6/13, 6/15-16 6/10-12 Trains sampled 70 40 22 8 The sample selection allowed for maximum representation of lines while keeping data collection as cost efficient as possible. Survey data were first weighted to actual ridership levels within line segments by time period. Weighting survey data helps ensure representativeness of results. Margin of error: ±1% at the 95% level of statistical confidence for a total satisfaction rating of 84% overall. At a 50% total satisfaction level, the margin of error is ±2%.

SERVICE ATTRIBUTE RATINGS 2010-2013

Total Satisfied 2010 2011 2012 2013 1. Long Island Rail Road overall 89% 78% 86% 84% Home Boarding Station 2. Your boarding station overall 90% 86% 88% 88% 3. Personal security 85% 82% 85% 85% 4. Cleanliness inside the station building (excluding restrooms) 84% 80% 81% 79% 5. Maintenance of station 85% 81% 82% 82% 6. Station signage 90% 87% 89% 88% 7. Cleanliness of restroom 68% 61% 61% 60% 8. Physical condition of restroom 70% 64% 65% 63% 9. Sound quality of audio announcements 81% 79% 81% 80% 10. Audio announcements under normal conditions 85% 84% 85% 84% 11. Audio announcements during service disruptions 74% 69% 71% 73% 12. Electronic or LED signs with train schedules 91% 89% 91% 89% 13. Availability of parking on weekdays 62% 60% 62% 62% 14. Security of your car while parked at the station 77% 77% 79% 79% 15. Cleanliness of platforms and outdoor shelters 82% 81% 81% 81% 16. Cleanliness of the track area around the station 82% 79% 81% 81%

Total Satisfied Your Train (AM & PM) 2010 2011 2012 2013 17. LIRR train service overall 89% 79% 86% 84% 18. On-time performance 86% 79% 84% 82% 19. Availability of seats 80% 76% 79% 78% 20. Condition of seats 88% 83% 84% 82% 21. Train interior maintenance lights, floors, windows, etc. (excluding seats) 89% 85% 86% 85% 22. The temperature on the train 89% 88% 88% 87% 23. Personal security 90% 88% 90% 90% 24. Cleanliness of restroom 64% 57% 59% 56% 25. Physical condition of restroom 69% 62% 62% 59% 26. Cleanliness of train s interior (excluding restrooms) 83% 79% 80% 80% 27. Safety from train accidents 93% 93% 93% 92% 28. Value for the money using the railroad 67% 56% 62% 59% 29. Sound quality of audio announcements 81% 78% 81% 79% 30. Audio announcements under normal conditions 85% 82% 84% 83% 31. Audio announcements during service disruptions 75% 70% 74% 73%

Total Satisfied Courtesy and Responsiveness of Our Employees 2010 2011 2012 2013 32. The overall courtesy and responsiveness of our employees 91% 90% 91% 90% 33. Conductors 93% 92% 93% 92% 34. Ticket Sellers 90% 87% 90% 88% 35. Overall schedule of trains 81% 75% 80% 79% 36. The weekday AM and PM peak schedule to and from your station 82% 79% 82% 81% 37. The weekday off-peak schedule to and from your station (including late night train service) 77% 70% 75% 75% 38. The weekend schedule to and from your station 78% 71% 75% 75% Communication (During Normal Service Conditions) 39. Overall communication to you 85% 79% 84% 83% 40. Overall communications during normal service conditions NA 84% 87% 86% 41. Overall communications during unplanned service disruptions NA 66% 71% 71% 42. Overall communications during planned service disruptions (track work, etc.) NA 79% 82% 80% 43. At your boarding station 89% 85% 88% 87% 44. On board your trains 89% 86% 87% 87% 45. At your destination station 90% 87% 88% 88% 46. At our website (www.mta.info) 89% 85% 89% 86% 47. With the Automated Phone System (Schedules, Fares, etc.) 83% 81% 84% 82% 48. With Customer Service Center representatives 88% 84% 86% 83%

Total Satisfied Communication (During Unplanned Service Disruptions) 2010 2011 2012 2013 49. At your boarding station 74% 65% 70% 69% 50. On board your trains 73% 67% 72% 71% 51. At your destination station 77% 69% 73% 73% 52. At our website (www.mta.info) 79% 72% 76% 74% 53. Through e-mail alerts (if you subscribe) 81% 73% 78% 75% 54. With the Automated Phone System (Schedules, Fares, etc.) 79% 71% 76% 73% 55. With Customer Service Center representatives 82% 74% 77% 74% 56. Facebook page (MTALIRR) NA NA 78% 75% 57. Twitter feed(@lirrscoop) NA NA 81% 75% Destination Station 58. LIRR destination station overall 88% 84% 84% 82% 59. Cleanliness of restroom 71% 64% 64% 62% 60. Physical condition of restroom 74% 68% 67% 65% 61. Cleanliness of destination station/waiting room (excluding restrooms) 78% 75% 76% 72% 62. Personal security 85% 82% 83% 80% 63. Signs providing directions to and from LIRR trains 88% 87% 88% 87% 64. Signs providing directions to and from connecting buses or subways 85% 83% 85% 83% 65. Presence of MTA Police 81% 83% 84% 82% 66. Sound quality of audio announcements 82% 80% 81% 80% 67. Audio announcements under normal conditions 84% 82% 84% 83% 68. Audio announcements during service disruptions 78% 72% 74% 73% 69. Electronic or LED signs with train schedules 90% 87% 89% 87%