POLICY STATEMENT AND REGULATIONS



Similar documents
Chapter 8: Performance Appraisal. Performance appraisal addresses the following objectives:

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FOR MIDDLE MANAGEMENT

SECTION I GENERAL JOB RESPONSIBILITIES

The University of Southern Mississippi Performance Appraisal Instructions

PERFORMANCE REVIEW & DEVELOPMENT PLAN GUIDE Administrative Staff & Managers and Technicians & Academic Counsellors

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL EMPLOYEE GUIDE

ST. THOMAS UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM WITH SUPERVISORY DUTIES

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM

Employee Performance Evaluation UConn Professional Staff (UCPEA) Unit

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM

PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS

Performance Management

Town of Sunapee Supervisory Performance Evaluation. Employee Last First Middle. Probationary progress Conclusion of probation

RULES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CHAPTER 60L-35 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM

Administrative Instruction

MILLSAPS COLLEGE ANNUAL EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION For Exempt and Nonexempt Staff

Manchester Community Schools Bus Driver Performance Appraisal

HUMAN RESOURCES. Revised: 04/30/03 Reviewed and Updated 11/11/10. To ensure a means by which employees and their supervisors can:

Sample Performance Appraisal

College of Design. Merit Pay Rating System. Merit Rating System

Oregon University System

DEPAUW UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROGRAM Hourly Employees

Amherst College Office of Human Resources PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROCESS GUIDE

Staff Performance Evaluation

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL APPRAISER S GUIDE

SOCIETY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL OF VANCOUVER ISLAND EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Performance Appraisal System

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROCEDURE

Civil Service Performance Management System

Staff Development and Performance Management Policy & Procedure

PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM (PACS)

FOOTHILL-DE ANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT

~~4 <l,.p. Human Resources Director

Performance Appraisal Handbook For Supervisors. For the evaluation of Non-Instructional Academic Staff (NIAS) and University Staff

Employee Performance Management Program. Revised and Reformatted, February 20, 2006; supersedes former policy HR6.30

CITY OF GUNNISON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM 2013

Performance Appraisal System Evaluation Form Managers

ARTICLE 26 - PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

F. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM

WINTHROP UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM POLICY AND PROCEDURE

EMPLOYEE REVIEW SYSTEM

ADMINISTRATOR PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL GUIDELINES

PRESENTATION ON PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL BY: LOUISE AGYEMAN-BARNING

Sul Ross State University Performance Planning and Appraisal Policy

HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT. Guide to Evaluating Classified Employees

DRAFT POLICY ON CONFIRMATION, EXTENSION AND TERMINATION OF PROBATIONARY APPOINTMENT OF CS EDUCATORS-KZN: DEC

NRCS PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE FOR NEW 5 LEVEL PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR SENIOR LEVEL AND SCIENTIFIC AND PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT AND APPRAISAL SYSTEM.

Guidance for Completing the Supervisory Employee Performance Appraisal Plan

Cleveland State Community College. Classified Employee Performance Review

The Citadel Policies & Procedures Human Resources Department. Employee Performance Management System

Employee Support and Development Performance Management Planning. Government Departments and Agencies

Rainy River District School Board SECTION 3

UC MERCED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN

DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SUPERVISOR OR RATER S GUIDE

Employee Position Description & Performance Evaluation Manual

Table of Contents Performance Management Process Schedule II Levels P age

ADMINISTRATIVE MEMORANDUM No. 92 Rev. 1. SUBJECT: Guidelines for the Performance Evaluation System

Code of Conduct, Statement of Corporate Purpose, Managing Unsatisfactory Performance, SES Performance Management

DOUGLAS COUNTY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL MANUAL (Non-Supervisory Employees) TABLE OF CONTENTS

LOUISIANA COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE SYSTEM FACULTY EVALUATION AND PLANNING FORM

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM POLICY

PART II GUIDE TO CONDUCTING A SUCCESSFUL PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL BEFORE

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

STAFF PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE

BUTLER UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT GUIDE

Chapter 4 Performance Appraisal Process

Performance Evaluation System (PES) Instruction Guide

MANAGING & EVALUATING EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE. A Guide to Classified Employee Performance Management & Evaluation

9. Performance Appraisal Tools and Techniques 1. Tools Ranking Method Limitations of Ranking Method: Forced Distribution method

MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Centre for Learning and Development

PLANO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Job Description. JOB TITLE: Elementary Principal WAGE/HOUR STATUS: Exempt

Annual Staff Appraisal Guidance Notes

Faculty Performance Appraisal System Akamai University

Chabot-Las Positas College Community District

Exempt Performance Reviews. Date Approved: June 23, 2008 Last Edited: June 3, 2014

HR09a ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW (Employee)

UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH Joint Employee Performance Appraisal Form

Performance Management

Staff Performance Review Policy and Procedure

ACC Performance Excellence Program (PEP)

Division of Human Resources Staff Performance Management Procedure

RESEARCH DEGREE REGULATIONS

THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL AND NON-TEACHING PROFESSIONAL STAFF

Delaware County Human Resources Department Performance Review System Supervisor Guide

Transcription:

POLICY STATEMENT AND REGULATIONS Number 100.16 EXEMPT STAFF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL POLICY POLICY: All exempt District staff shall have their performance reviewed 1) twice during any probationary period determined to be applicable, and thereafter 2) annually during the 3 months following the preliminary budget. PURPOSE: 1. The objectives of performance appraisals are to evaluate employee performance, communicate employer expectations and standards, ensure plans and goals are mutually set to achieve corporate objectives and develop employee skills, provide feedback to employees on performance and improve two-way communication, and provide systematic, objective information on employee performance to support promotion, appointment and termination decisions. PROCEDURE: 1. Performance appraisal of the Administrator, including the actual appraisal interview and completion of the evaluation form, is the responsibility of the Mayor and Council. 2. Performance appraisal of senior management staff, including the actual appraisal interview and completion of the evaluation form is the responsibility of the Administrator. 3. Performance appraisals of other exempt staff including the actual appraisal interview and completion of the evaluation form is the responsibility of the immediate supervisor. 4. Appraisal supervisors (Mayor or Administrator) will provide Council with a summary of the appraisal results and recommendations for promotions, actions to be undertaken, recognition, or termination, following completion of the annual appraisal interviews.

ADOPTED: February 10, 2003

DISTRICT OF SUMMERLAND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 1. PURPOSE: The purpose of the performance management program is to evaluate performance. The performance management program requires an annual performance appraisal for each exempt staff position to evaluate employee performance based on the following objectives: communicate employer expectations and standards, ensure that plans and goals are mutually set to achieve corporate objectives and develop the employee, provide feedback to employees on performance and improve two-way communication, provide systematic, objective information on employee performance to support promotion, appointment and termination decisions, and 2. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROCESS: Each Reviewing Supervisor initiates and has his/her employee complete both the Performance Appraisal and Objectives and Work Plan sections of the review form for each employee reporting to him/her. The Reviewing Supervisor meets with the employee to discuss the assessment and work plan for the next calendar year, documenting adjustments to the assessment and work plan agreed to with the employee. Each employee is given 24 hours to review and comment on the assessment and to sign and return it to his/her Reviewing Supervisor. The completed and signed form is forwarded by the Reviewing Supervisor to the Administrator for review. This original form is then filed in the employee s personnel file. In the case of a disagreement or a dispute between the reviewing supervisory and the employee arising in consequence of the appraisal process, the matter will be referred to the supervisor s manager and will be resolved in the presence of the reviewing supervisor and the employee. 3. PERFORMANCE REVIEW In narrative form, the employee provides an overall assessment of performance during the previous calendar year. Include specific achievements, accomplishments that demonstrate behaviours, attitudes and capabilities consistent with successful performance. Major strengths, areas of excellence and activities handled well. Results which have not been met and any aspect of performance which, if not

corrected, could hinder success in the current position or future development. Adjustments and/or activities which must be undertaken to succeed in the current position and enhance future development. 4. OBJECTIVES AND WORK PLAN This section is intended to include specific objectives and a work plan for the next calendar year, over and above those identified in budget documents. The list should include any training or development programs in which the incumbent is to participate. Completion dates are to be provided where appropriate. Objectives and Work Plan Completion Date 5. KEY RESULTS ANTICIPATED DURING THE NEXT YEAR This section is intended to include specific short term results that should be achieved in the next review period. 6. CURRENT PERFORMANCE LEVEL ( ) Insufficient time to judge less than four months on current job. ( ) Marginal or Unsatisfactory does not meet minimum job requirements and/or expectations; regularly fails to meet commitments; below competent level. ( ) Acceptable meets job requirements and/or expectations reasonable well; occasionally does not meet realistic commitments; may not satisfactorily perform some of the job requirements. ( ) Fully Satisfactory meets job requirements and/or expectations; a good employee who regularly meets realistic commitments, presentation and performance standards. ( ) Superior* exceeds job requirements and expectations; frequently exceeds commitments and performance standards. ( ) Outstanding* far exceeds expectations, consistently exceeds commitments and

job requirements. * Please provide specific examples and details of the achievements that you believe qualify the incumbent for a Superior or Outstanding rating. Please also explain the impact of the achievement. Supervisor s Comments: Employee s Comments: Senior Level Reviewer s Comments (if applicable): Employee s Signature Supervisor s Signature Administrator s Signature