Chapter 8: Performance Appraisal. Performance appraisal addresses the following objectives:
|
|
|
- Anthony Taylor
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Chapter 8: Performance Appraisal Section 8-1: General Performance appraisal addresses the following objectives: Provides a basis for the determination of the level of performance, to involve the employee in this determination and to identify areas of work which need improvement or which exceed the expectations of the position. Provides a performance based evaluation for the award of compensation increases based on performance levels. Improves communication between employees and management. Section 8-2: Job Description The basis for evaluating performance is the job description. Department Heads assure that job descriptions for positions in their departments are accurate and reflect essential functions. Employees are accountable for performing all aspects of the job description in a proficient manner. Section 8-3: Standards of Performance The standards expected of an employee are to be established and communicated by the Department Head or supervisor prior to the appraisal process. The Department Head or supervisor is expected to involve the employee: In establishing the criteria by which his/her performance is to be judged; In planning future improvements in that performance; and In establishing mutual responsibilities and expectations with respect to improving job performance. 8.1
2 Section 8-4: Communication With Employee The Department Head or supervisor is required to meet with new employees, within 30 days of hire, transfer, promotion, demotion, etc., and with all other employees at the beginning of each evaluation cycle for the following purposes: To review the job description to assure that it is accurate. Any necessary revisions in essential functions should be recommended to the Human Resources Department in the form of a revised job description. To identify and clearly define the responsibilities of the employee and the expectations of the supervisor. The weight for each element shall be established by the Department Head or supervisor and communicated to the employee. To establish objectives for the employee using a department work plan as a base. This is intended to be a manual setting of objectives, which may be used to establish a basis for the performance rating. Section 8-5: Interim Review At any time during the evaluation cycle, the supervisor may arrange a time to meet with the employee for the following purposes: Review progress. The supervisor shares with the employee any performance problems that have been noted and outlines measures needed for improvement. Supervisors are encouraged to schedule a review with those employees who are exceeding their performance objectives in order to support their achievements. Review employee concerns. The employee shares any problems being experienced which may be hindering job performance. For example, sometimes equipment or personnel problems exist that could be corrected by the supervisor, or 8.2
3 daily operations have changed to the point of making it difficult to accomplish an initially agreed upon objective. At this time, any changes in the initial expectations may be noted. This conference may be requested by either the supervisor or the employee. Whether or not a formal conference is held, it is the supervisor's responsibility to advise the employee of performance deficiencies. Section 8-6: Evaluation Conference At least two weeks prior to the employee s Performance Review Date (PRD), the immediate supervisor shall schedule a time for the evaluation conference. Before this conference, the supervisor must complete the appropriate evaluation document and any supporting narrative necessary to clarify the performance appraisal rating or describe any corrective actions necessary to achieve satisfactory performance. Prior to meeting with the employee, the completed evaluation document must receive any necessary departmental approvals and be forwarded to the Human Resources Department for review and salary computation as outlined in Chapter 3. The employee is provided with a copy of the evaluation document prior to the conference. Discussion between the employee and the supervisor should be related to performance factors and should deal only with job related matters. The employee should be encouraged to submit a response to the evaluation, particularly if there are areas of disagreement. If an employee refuses to sign the evaluation form and any additional pages, the reviewer should note this on the evaluation form, and sign and date the notation. 8.3
4 Section 8-7: Performance Appraisal Rating Performance appraisal ratings qualify the employee for a performance based salary increase in accordance with the rules and regulations set forth in Chapter 3. The numerical rating scale ranges from 0 to for each element, and specific definitions are provided on the evaluation document. An employee s total score determines the overall performance level. Actions to be taken based on scores are as follows: = UNSATISFACTORY/MARGINAL (Output consistently below expectations) Termination if employee is probationary, and termination or demotion if regular employee = REQUIRES IMPROVEMENT (Output fails to consistently meet expectations) Supervisor and employee must develop a Corrective Action Plan with a realistic timeframe that identifies those performance factors needing improvement. Reevaluation within 60 days. Lack of improvement may result in termination or demotion = PROFICIENT (Meets expectations of the position in all areas.) = HIGHLY PROFICIENT (Routinely performs on a level that is beyond what is expected for the position.) = EXCEPTIONAL 8.4
5 (Work during the evaluation period has consisted of extraordinary efforts in a single project or a number of specific tasks that would not be considered a routine function of that position). Section 8-8: Corrective Action A written corrective action plan must be developed for each employee whose performance requires improvement. The plan clearly identifies for the employee the expectations of the supervisor and establishes a realistic time frame for achievement. An additional performance evaluation document (reevaluation) must be completed in 60 days. No additional compensation is awarded to an employee on a reevaluation for corrective action. Section 8-9: Exceptional Performance Exceptional performance is that which consists of extraordinary efforts in a single project or a number of specific tasks that would not be considered a routine function of the employee s position. Should the numerical scoring completed by the immediate supervisor of an employee indicate exceptional performance, the evaluation detailing the exceptional performance must be forwarded to the County Administrator for review and approval of the pay for performance salary increase. This approval process must occur prior to any discussion of the evaluation with the employee. 8.5
POLICY STATEMENT AND REGULATIONS
POLICY STATEMENT AND REGULATIONS Number 100.16 EXEMPT STAFF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL POLICY POLICY: All exempt District staff shall have their performance reviewed 1) twice during any probationary period
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM POLICY
FRANCIS MARION UNIVERSITY Human Resources Office SUBJECT: Employee Performance Management System Policy Originated: 12/13/93 Revised: 5/25/94 Revised: 7/24/96 Revised: 7/1/99 Revised: 4/18/01 EMPLOYEE
DEFINITIONS. Annual Appraisal the performance evaluation conducted once a year that goes in an employee s permanent record.
DEFINITIONS Annual Appraisal the performance evaluation conducted once a year that goes in an employee s permanent record. Appointing Authority Agency head or designee who is responsible for final review
The Citadel Policies & Procedures Human Resources Department. Employee Performance Management System
1. PURPOSE Employee Performance Management System The purpose of the Employee Performance Management System (EPMS) is as follows: A. To provide an accurate and objective method to evaluate classified and
B. Probationary Evaluations
A.R. Number: 5.7 Effective Date: 2/1/2007 Page: 1 of 9 I. PURPOSE A. This policy outlines the Employee Performance Evaluation System (EPES) and the process to be followed for evaluating City of Richmond
Performance Management System
Section 10, Page 1 Contents: Policy Policy Definitions The Process of Managing Performance Addressing Poor Performance Supporting Employee Development Transitions Access and Use of Performance Information
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL APPRAISER S GUIDE
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL APPRAISER S GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...3 THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM...4 Performance Factors...4 Performance Levels... 5 Performance Appraisal Rating...6 Appraiser
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL EMPLOYEE GUIDE
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL EMPLOYEE GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...3 THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM...4 Performance Factors...4 Performance Levels...4 Performance Appraisal Rating...5 Appraiser s Overview
CITY OF GUNNISON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM 2013
CITY OF GUNNISON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM 2013 Name: Position: Anniversary Date in Position: Department: Supervisor: Appraisal Period: from to PURPOSE Communication about performance between
Alexander County Performance Evaluation Policy
Alexander County Performance Evaluation Policy Adopted: April 2, 2002 Revised August 4, 2003 I. INTRODUCTION The County of Alexander has recognized the relationship of position classification, job performance,
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
HOSPITAL NAME INSTITUTIONAL POLICY AND PROCEDURE (IPP) Department: Manual: Section: TITLE/DESCRIPTION POLICY NUMBER PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVE DATE REVIEW DUE REPLACES NUMBER NO. OF PAGES APPROVED
Civil Service Performance Management System
Civil Service Performance Management System A handbook for Supervisors on how to conduct performance planning, mid-term progress review and annual appraisal meetings. Table of Contents 1 Abbreviations...
Performance Evaluation for Classified and Unclassified Non-Academic Staff
NUMBER: HR 1.36 SECTION: SUBJECT: Human Resources Performance Evaluation for Classified and Unclassified Non-Academic Staff DATE: July 1, 1995 REVISED: September 21, 2012 Policy for: Procedure for: Authorized
Department of Management Services Division of Human Resource Management PROGRAM GUIDELINES
Department of Management Services Division of Human Resource Management PROGRAM GUIDELINES SUBJECT: Administration of the Performance Management Process STATUTORY/RULE REFERENCE: EFFECTIVE DATE: Section
~~4 <l,.p. Human Resources Director
Approved: City of Riverside, California Human Resources Policy and Procedure Manual ~~4
University of Maryland Nonexempt Staff PRD Form
PERFORMANCE REVIEW AND DEVELOPMENT PROCESS University of Maryland Nonexempt Staff PRD Form Employee Name: UID: Job Title: Division/Department: Supervisor: Rating Cycle: Date of Final Review: Section/Unit:
Yale University Performance Management Guide
Yale University Performance Management Guide Table of Contents Section Page Philosophy and Intent 3 FOCUS Annual Performance Management Cycle 4 Expectations 5 Starting With the End in Mind 5 Important
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 1, 2010 Page 1 of 12
1093.0 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION 1093.0.1 Authorization: Act 688 of 2009 amends Arkansas Code Annotated 21-5-1101 to provide a performance-based merit increase pay system based on employee performance evaluation.
This policy provides establishes procedures for evaluating employees performance and communicating performance expectations.
Revision Date: First Version Page: 1 of 10 I. SCOPE This policy applies to all salaried operational employees of the College of William and Mary, including the Virginia Institute of Marine Science (hereafter
STATE BOARD FOR TECHNICAL AND COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION PROCEDURE
PAGE: 1 of 17 TITLE: EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (EPMS) (REVIEW DATE OPTION) POLICY REFERENCE NUMBER: 8-4-100 DIVISION OF RESPONSIBILITY: Human Resource Services DATE OF LAST REVISION: May 13,
RULES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CHAPTER 60L-35 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM
60L-35.001 Scope and Purpose 60L-35.002 Definitions 60L-35.003 Minimum Requirements 60L-35.004 Career Service 60L-35.005 Selected Exempt Service 60L-35.006 Transitional Provision (Repealed) 60L-35.001
TOWN OF NEEDHAM PUBLIC WORKS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION POLICY #419
TOWN OF NEEDHAM PUBLIC WORKS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION POLICY #419 I. PURPOSE AND SCOPE The Purpose of this policy is to outline the Town's Public Works performance evaluation program, including the use of
FY 2015 Senior Professional (SP) Performance Appraisal System Opening Guidance
Office of Executive Resources Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer U.S. Department of Energy FY 2015 Senior Professional (SP) Performance Appraisal System Opening Guidance Table of Contents Contents
WINTHROP UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM POLICY AND PROCEDURE
WINTHROP UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM POLICY AND PROCEDURE THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT A CONTRACT BETWEEN EMPLOYEES AND WINTHROP UNIVERSITY, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. THIS DOCUMENT DOES
F. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM
F. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM GENERAL POLICY It is the policy of Scott County to regularly evaluate the work performance of its employees and provide them with relevant feedback to enable
Employee Performance Review
Employee Name Position Title Employee Self Review Supervisory Review Program Hire Evaluation Period End of Introductory Period Supervisor's Name Supervisor Title Seen as strength Meets Requirements Needs
Chapter 110, Florida Statutes; Chapter 60L-35, Florida Administrative Code; Executive Director
SECTION: 6.4 SUBJECT: AUTHORITY: Performance Evaluation System Chapter 110, Florida Statutes; Chapter 60L-35, Florida Administrative Code; Executive Director Policy: Evaluations will be used by supervisors
RATER S GUIDE STATE OF ALASKA
RATER S GUIDE STATE OF ALASKA Division of Personnel Department of Administration September 2004 08/31/04 1 Original: 1984 Limitations on the Use of the Rater s Guide The Rater s Guide does not constitute
08.530 Employee Performance Management Program. Revised and Reformatted, February 20, 2006; supersedes former policy HR6.30
08.530 Employee Performance Management Program Authority: History: Source of Authority: Related Links: Director of Human Resources Revised and Reformatted, February 20, 2006; supersedes former policy HR6.30
DOUGLAS COUNTY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL MANUAL (Non-Supervisory Employees) TABLE OF CONTENTS
DOUGLAS COUNTY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL MANUAL (Non-Supervisory Employees) TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM DESCRIPTION PAGE(S) Section I Introduction 1-2 Section
DENTON COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION CHAPTER III EMPLOYMENT. P a g e 10 32
DENTON COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION CHAPTER III EMPLOYMENT P a g e 10 32 EMPLOYMENT PROCEDURES. 3.1 The Denton County Sheriff s hiring process is centralized and managed by the Denton
FANSHAWE COLLEGE POLICY MANUAL TITLE: PERFORMANCE PLANNING, REVIEW AND COMPENSATION ADJUSTMENT - ADMINISTRATIVE EMPLOYEES 1-B-25
1. ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES SECTION B -HUMAN RESOURCES TITLE: PERFORMANCE PLANNING, REVIEW AND COMPENSATION ADJUSTMENT - ADMINISTRATIVE EMPLOYEES 1-B-25 POLICY NUMBER: EFFECTIVE: 2012 04
Performance Appraisal System Evaluation Form Managers
Performance Appraisal System Evaluation Form Managers Name: Position Title: Department: Plan Date: Annual Review Date: PURPOSE OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Enable joint planning and communication between a
Instruction Manual. May, 2015 Performance Appraisal Process Local 2324 Represented Employees
Instruction Manual May, 2015 Performance Appraisal Process Local 2324 Represented Employees Human Resources May, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM PAGE INTRODUCTORY MATERIAL Performance Appraisal Instructions
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Name Social Security No. Agency Department Position Classification Date Assigned to Current Position Performance Review From To PLANNING STAGE
PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS
PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS INDEX CODE: 707 EFFECTIVE DATE: 07-06-15 Contents: I. Policy II. Objectives of Performance Evaluation III. Elements of the System IV. Responsibilities V. Frequency & Types VI. Utilization
NRCS PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE FOR NEW 5 LEVEL PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
NRCS PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE FOR NEW 5 LEVEL PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM INTRODUCTION This is an at-a-glance tool for establishing hardcopy performance plans, conducting midyear
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MODEL POLICY (Revised and Effective 11/1/09) MANDATORY BASELINE EPMS SYSTEM
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MODEL POLICY (Revised and Effective 11/1/09) THE LANGUAGE USED IN THIS DOCUMENT DOES NOT CREATE AN EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT BETWEEN THE EMPLOYEE AND THE AGENCY. THIS DOCUMENT
Delaware County Human Resources Department Performance Review System Supervisor Guide
Supervisors, Managers and Directors, Thank you for reviewing the. This guide is an important source of information regarding the administration of the Performance Review System. The proper application
INTRODUCTION PART ONE: REVIEW OF PERFORMANCE ELEMENTS
INTRODUCTION This recommended performance appraisal form incorporates extensive feedback from University of California supervisors and managers. It captures the basic principles of effectively evaluating
PRESENTATION ON PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL BY: LOUISE AGYEMAN-BARNING
PRESENTATION ON PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL BY: LOUISE AGYEMAN-BARNING OUTLINE Definition of Performance Appraisal Why Performance Appraisal (Objectives) Benefits Types of Performance Appraisal Appraisal System
University of the District of Columbia Performance Appraisal System For Non-Faculty Employees. Supervisor Guide
University of the District of Columbia Performance Appraisal System For Non-Faculty Employees 1. Purpose 2. Overview 3. Performance Planning Supervisor Guide 4. Monitoring Employee Performance: Ongoing
Tips for Filling out the Performance Planning and Appraisal Form (PPAF):
Tips for Filling out the Performance Planning and Appraisal Form (PPAF): The form used in the Performance Planning and Performance Appraisal processes is entitled the Performance Planning and Appraisal
HUMAN RESOURCES. Revised: 04/30/03 Reviewed and Updated 11/11/10. To ensure a means by which employees and their supervisors can:
HUMAN RESOURCES Revised: 04/30/03 Reviewed and Updated 11/11/10 Policy Statement 3: Performance Management Performance Management Program 1. Purpose To establish a Policy for implementing and managing
Public Act 101 of 2011: Amendments to the Michigan Teacher Tenure Law
On July 19 th 2011, Governor Snyder signed into law the Teacher Quality and Tenure Reform bill package. These new laws make major changes to the Teacher Tenure Act, Revised School Code, and Public Employee
Performance Management S TA F F D E V E L O P M E N T & T R A I N I N G
Performance Management S TA F F D E V E L O P M E N T & T R A I N I N G Performance Objectives Identify the definition of Performance Management. Identify the Performance Management process. Identify the
Oregon University System
Oregon University System COMPLETING A PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL For Employees in Classified Information Technology Positions Represented by the Oregon Public Employees Union Instructions for Supervisors INTRODUCTION
TECHNICAL GUIDANCE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
TECHNICAL GUIDANCE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Prepared by the Division of Human Resources in the Department of Personnel & Administration. Issued March 17, 2014. GENERAL This document is for use by human resources
Performance Management
Performance Management PURPOSE... 1 POLICY STATEMENT... 2 WHO SHOULD KNOW THIS POLICY... 2 DEFINITIONS... 2 REGULATIONS... 3 1.0 TIMING AND FREQUENCY OF APPRAISALS... 3 2.0 PERFORMANCE PLANNING... 3 2.1
STATE OF VERMONT ATTORNEY PAY PLAN
STATE OF VERMONT ATTORNEY PAY PLAN It is the intent of the State of Vermont to compensate exempt attorneys equitably on the basis of experience, expertise, responsibilities, and meritorious performance.
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM Employee Name Dept.: Division Unit: Job Title Period covered by this evaluation Type of evaluation Probationary From: / /
Compensation Plan for Exempt and Non-Exempt Staff
Compensation Plan for Exempt and Non-Exempt Staff Original Implementation: February 3, 2005 Last Revision: January 28, 2014 Objective: It is the intent of Stephen F. Austin State University to maintain
Employee Performance Management System (EPMS) - FAQs
GENERAL Employee Performance Management System (EPMS) - FAQs Q. Who is covered under the University s EPMS Policy HR 1.36? A. HR 1.36 describes the policy and procedures for the job performance evaluation
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL GUIDE
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL GUIDE University Human Resources, Rutgers University - 1 - Directions for Conducting Performance Appraisals Purpose An annual performance appraisal is required for all eligible administrative,
POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES Human Resource Management Division PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM
POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES Human Resource Management Division PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM Pursuant to the provisions of Rule IX of the Omnibus Rules Implementing Book V of Executive Order
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH Joint Employee Performance Appraisal Form
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH Joint Employee Performance Appraisal Form EMPLOYEE: CLASSIFICATION: EMPL ID: DEPARTMENT: RATER: TYPE OF EVALUATION: PROBATIONARY ANNUAL OTHER EVALUATION DATE: The Employee
State of Hawai'i EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL HRD 526 (Rev. 9/05)
State of Hawai'i EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL HRD 526 (Rev. 9/05) Section #1 Name of Employee Position Title XXX-XX- Social Security No. Position No. Salary Range/Step Bargaining Unit Section #2 Department
Practices and challenges of employee performance appraisal in the Ministry of Culture and Tourism, Ethiopia
Practices and challenges of employee performance appraisal in the Ministry of Culture and Tourism, Ethiopia Adeba Hundera, Addis Ababa University School of Commerce, Department of BAIS, Ethiopia Introduction
PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND APPRAISAL FORM MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL
Employee Name: Position Title: Department: Supervisor Name: Date of Review: For Period: To At the beginning of each performance cycle, employee and supervisor establish performance objectives based on
The Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies (DORA) Performance Management Program Updated - April, 2009
The Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies (DORA) Performance Management Program Updated - April, 2009 Background This document provides details of the Department of Regulatory Agencies Performance
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FOR MIDDLE MANAGEMENT
BOARD PROCEDURE Approval Date 2010 Review Date 2015 Contact Person/Department Human Resources Administrator Replacing All previous policies Page 1 of 12 Identification HR-4540 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FOR
Exempt Performance Reviews. Date Approved: June 23, 2008 Last Edited: June 3, 2014
Page: 1 Policy The performance review process is a formal communication which is an integral part of performance management and is tied to compensation. All exempt and management employees will have an
Reclamation Manual Directives and Standards
Subject: Purpose: Fee-for-Service Business Practices for Technical Services Work This Directive and Standard (D&S) identifies steps to be taken for executing technical services work using standardized
Performance Appraisal System
SUPERVISORY MANUAL Performance Appraisal System For a New Century State Workforce State of Hawaii Department of Human Resources Development July 1, 2001 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM POLICY STATEMENT Public
Table of Contents Performance Management Process Schedule II Levels 7-12 1 P age
Table of Contents Management Process Schedule II Levels 7-12 1 P age TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Statement of Purpose.. 3 Guiding Principles and Values 4 KEY COMPONENTS OF THE PERFORMANCE
Program Statement DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. Number: 3210.2B Date: February 3, 2011 Supersedes: 3210.1A (5/30/01) Evaluations
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Program Statement OPI: HRM Number: 3210.2B Date: February 3, 2011 Supersedes: 3210.1A (5/30/01) Subject: Performance Evaluations 1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE. To
Performance-Based Evaluation Handbook
Baltimore City Public School System Performance-Based Evaluation Handbook Department of Professional Development Performance-Based Evaluation October 2003 PBES Handbook (Revised 2003) i Table of Contents
ACC Performance Excellence Program (PEP)
ACC Performance Excellence Program (PEP) Performance Review for Classified, Professional-Technical, Administrative Employees Employee Evaluation of Supervisor s Work Performance (An Upward Evaluation)
Interim Performance Management System for Positions Transitioning to the GS from NSPS. Department of the Navy Handbook. Version 2.
Interim Performance Management System for Positions Transitioning to the GS from NSPS Department of the Navy Handbook Version 2.0 September 2010 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 3 BACKGROUND 3 WHO IS COVERED?
STATE OF VERMONT PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD PAY PLAN
STATE OF VERMONT PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD PAY PLAN It is the intent of the Public Service Board to compensate exempt employees equitably, subject to budgetary constraints, on the basis of experience, expertise,
XYZ Contractors, Inc.
XYZ Contractors, Inc. 1995 STAFF EMPLOYEE BONUS PLAN PURPOSE The purpose of the XYZ Employee Bonus Plan is to focus the attention and efforts of employees on XYZ's financial and operational goals and to
PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND APPRAISAL FORM NON-BARGAINING UNIT, NON-MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL
Employee Name: Position Title: Department: Supervisor Name: Date of Review: For Period: To At the beginning of each performance cycle, employee and supervisor review key responsibilities (from the job
Manager / Supervisor Performance Review
Manager / Supervisor Performance Review SECTION 1 Personal Information (Please print clearly and provide complete & accurate information) Employee Name: Current Review Period: to Job Title: Department
State of Hawai'i EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL HRD 526 (Rev. 9/05)
State of Hawai'i EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL HRD 526 (Rev. 9/05) Section #1 Name of Employee Position Title XXX-XX- Social Security No. Position No. Salary Range/Step Bargaining Unit Section #2 Department
ADMINISTRATIVE MEMORANDUM No. 92 Rev. 1. SUBJECT: Guidelines for the Performance Evaluation System
ADMINISTRATIVE MEMORANDUM No. 92 Rev. 1 SUBJECT: Guidelines for the Performance Evaluation System I. BACKGROUND Article 39 of the General Standards, entitled "Work Performance Evaluation," states: Staff
AMOCO SKILLS APPRAISAL
AMOCO SKILLS APPRAISAL APM-MPG s Inventory The Inventory is divided into eight performance dimension sections identifying the skills required to do your job. Communication Creativity/Innovation Decision
PART I D.C. PERSONNEL REGULATIONS CHAPTER 14 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT CONTENTS
CHAPTER 14 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT 14-I-i Section PART I D.C. PERSONNEL REGULATIONS CHAPTER 14 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT CONTENTS Page 1400 APPLICABILITY...... 1 1401 EXCLUSIONS... 1 1402 PURPOSE... 2 1403
EMPLOYEE APPRAISAL REPORT
An evaluation of performance and accomplishments for Year Ending December 2007 Employee Name: Employee ID #: Position Title Grade: Annual Appraisal Schedule TASK COMPLETION DATE SUPERVISOR S INITIALS EMPLOYEE
User s Guide to Performance Management
User s Guide to Performance Management University Human Resources Brown University Table of Contents 1 I. Overview 3 II. The Performance Management Cycle 4 III. Performance Management Forms..6 1. Goal
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (PMP)
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (PMP) Revised April 2015 1 Introduction Performance management is an ongoing process of communication between a supervisor and an employee that occurs throughout the year,
9. Performance Appraisal Tools and Techniques 1. Tools Ranking Method Limitations of Ranking Method: Forced Distribution method
SEC 9 Page 1 of 5 9. Performance Appraisal Tools and Techniques 1. Tools Performance appraisals are a fact of life for employees and supervisors in most companies. When taken seriously and conducted the
TITLE, POSITION AND SALARY CONTROL FOR PROFESSIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL PS-20
TITLE, POSITION AND SALARY CONTROL FOR PROFESSIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL PS-20 PURPOSE To describe the pay plan used by the LSU & A&M College campus for its administrative and professional employees
3300 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM 3301 PROBATIONARY SYSTEM. A. Policy
3300 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM 3301 PROBATIONARY SYSTEM A. Policy The probationary system ensures that newly hired or promoted employees are aware of the expectations of their supervisors and are apprised
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES
INTRODUCTION CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES The City of Corpus Christi's Performance Management Process is designed to: 1. Communicate performance expectations
DEPAUW UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROGRAM Hourly Employees
DEPAUW UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROGRAM Hourly Employees PART I PURPOSE DePauw University s performance appraisal process is based upon the belief that employees are our most critical resource,
BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL
BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL HUMAN RESOURCES POLICIES AND PROCEDURES SUBJECT: COMPENSATION POLICY #: HR- 201 EFFECTIVE DATE: January 1, 2008 POLICY Brigham and Women s Hospital maintains an employee compensation
Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures
Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures ANNUAL FACULTY APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 2-0112 ACADEMIC AFFAIRS September 2015 POLICY 1.01 A review of faculty activities and accomplishments for
