Annual Staff Appraisal Guidance Notes
|
|
|
- Magnus Moody
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Annual Staff Appraisal Guidance Notes Annual Staff Appraisal Process It is a requirement that every member of staff is appraised on an annual basis. The review period will cover the previous 12 calendar months. All staff appraisals will normally be carried out between April and July of the current year, with the aim of completing all appraisals by the end of July. Any Head of Department wishing to deviate from this pattern will need to seek permission from their line manager. Aims of the appraisal: To enable you and your Appraiser to: Review your performance against the objectives and key tasks agreed last year. Plan your activities for the next year and identify and agree action points and time scales with reference to personal, departmental and College wide objectives. Provide a framework within which a review of your career can take place and plans for your future development can be agreed. Provide for the College the information necessary to plan and fund training and career development within financial and other constraints, in the context of the College's overall strategy. The appraisal process The appraisal process centres on a meeting between the Appraiser and the staff member being appraised (Appraisee). The Head of Department should appoint Appraisers. For academic members of staff appraisals should generally be carried out by a member of the Professoriate. In exceptional circumstances, an Appraisee may request a change of Appraiser. If agreement cannot be reached between the Head of Department and the Appraisee concerning the appointment of an Appraiser, the matter may be brought to the attention of the Director of Operations or the appropriate Dean for a final decision. 1 of 5
2 Preparation for the meeting - Appraisee Before the meeting, the Appraisee should have completed the relevant sections of the appraisal form: Section 1: Personal Details Section 2a: Review of Last Year Objectives and/ or Key Tasks Appendix A: Review of Last Year Staff Development Feedback The remaining sections of the Annual Staff Appraisal form should be completed at the meeting. Provide the Appraiser with a copy of the forms at least one week before the date of the appraisal meeting. Preparation for the meeting - Appraiser Before conducting the appraisal: Agree a date for the meeting and ensure that the completed forms have been received at least one week before the meeting. Review any training and development activities undertaken by the Appraisee during the period under consideration and indicate how useful these activities have been to your department (Appendix A). Complete Section 2b by reviewing the objectives agreed at the last appraisal meeting and assessing how successful the Appraisee has been in achieving these objectives and in their overall job performance, taking into account any changes in circumstances. Consider objectives for the coming year and, if relevant, consider longer term objectives - these should relate to major aspects of personal development in the Departmental context (Sections 3a and 3b). Consider areas of training and development required to enhance performance and the appropriate resources needed to achieve this (Appendix B). Appraisal Meeting The contents of Sections 3a, 3b, 4, 5 and Appendix B of the Annual Staff Appraisal form should be agreed at the meeting. It is expected that the appraisal will take about an hour to complete. Where the Appraiser is not the Head of Department, the accuracy of the completed forms should be checked by both parties before they are passed by the Appraiser to the Head of Department for signature and comment (Section 6). A signed copy of the form will be returned to the Appraisee within two weeks of the meeting taking place. In the rare event of an unresolved disagreement between the Appraisee and the Appraiser it should be taken up with the Head of Department. If this fails to resolve the matter it may be brought to the attention of the Director of Operations or the relevant Dean for a final decision. 2 of 5
3 The Appraisal in relation to rewarding performance A copy of Section 5 of the Annual Staff Appraisal form may be attached to any application for a performance award, e.g. contribution points or one-off payments, where the Appraisee so wishes. Responsibilities Appraisee and Appraiser It is the responsibility of the Appraisee and Appraiser to: ensure that agreed action points are taken forward in the light of future career development plans draw agreed action points to the attention of those who are responsible for their implementation Heads of Department Heads of Departments are responsible for ensuring that appropriate and secure arrangements are made locally for the retention of their staff s completed Appraisal forms. It is essential that Heads of Departments forward copies of Appendices A and B of the Annual Staff Appraisal form to the Staff Development Team as soon as possible after the date of the meeting (if no training has been identified in the current appraisal please write NIL on the Training and Development Plan). Furthermore, Heads of Department are also responsible for maintaining an updated summary sheet, which individuals have signed and dated to confirm that their appraisal has taken place. This summary sheet must then be returned to the Director of Human Resources by the stipulated deadline. 3 of 5
4 Preparation for and conduct of Appraisal meetings Agree dates for Appraisal meeting and submission of documentation Appraiser Appraisee Ensure you have received Appraisal form from Appraisee by agreed date and have arranged suitable venue for meeting to take place Complete Sections 1, 2a and Appendix A of Appraisal form Review training and development undertaken by Appraisee complete Appendix A Draft proposals for Section 3a (and 3b if relevant) Review previous objectives set and complete Section 2b Identify objectives for coming year (or longer if appropriate) for Sections 3a and 3b Identify areas for training and development and appropriate resources (Appendix B) Identify training and development needs for Individual Training Plan (Appendix B) Submit copy of documentation to Appraiser by agreed date For your own notes or you may wish to include in the forms submitted to your Appraiser During the appraisal meeting agree Sections 3a, 3b, 4, 5 and Appendix B of Appraisal form 4 of 5
5 Actions to be taken after Appraisal meeting Appraiser: Finalise Appraisal documentation and pass back to Appraisee for signature Forward signed Appraisal documentation to Head of Department for signature and comment Head of Department: Sign Section 5 of Appraisal form; complete Section 6, where relevant Ensure Appraisee signs and dates Section 6 of Appraisal form, if appropriate, and the appraisal summary sheet to confirm that appraisal has taken place. Return a copy of the completed documentation to Appraisee. Forward copies of Appendices A and B of the Appraisal form to the Staff Development Team ensure that both parties have signed Appendix B (Training and Development Plan). When completed, return appraisal summary sheet to Director of Human Resources. Ensure that secure arrangements are made locally for retention of a copy of all completed Appraisal documentation. 5 of 5
Policy for the Appraisal of School Staff
PRESTON & WINGHAM PRIMARY SCHOOLS FEDERATION Policy for the Appraisal of School Staff APPROVAL & ADOPTION This policy was formally agreed and adopted by the Governing Body on: Chair of Governors Signed:
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM Employee Name Dept.: Division Unit: Job Title Period covered by this evaluation Type of evaluation Probationary From: / /
Compassion Courage Hope Integrity Justice Respect Responsibility - Wisdom. Herne Bay Junior School. Appraisal Policy. Policy Agreed: Sept 2015
Compassion Courage Hope Integrity Justice Respect Responsibility - Wisdom Herne Bay Junior School Appraisal Policy Policy Agreed: Sept 2015 Review Date: Sept 2016 1 1 Introduction Purpose of the Policy
Staff Performance Appraisal Report GP 247 A (Revised 2008)
REPUBLIC OF KENYA Staff Performance Appraisal Report GP 247 A (Revised 2008) (For officers on Job Group H and above in the Civil Service and officers on salary scale 1-9 in Local Authorities) 1 GP 247
Policy for the Appraisal of School Staff
Policy for the Appraisal of School Staff The Governing Body of Hartlip Endowed Church of England Primary School adopted this performance management policy October 2014. 1. Introduction Purpose of the Policy
Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures
Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures ANNUAL FACULTY APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 2-0112 ACADEMIC AFFAIRS September 2015 POLICY 1.01 A review of faculty activities and accomplishments for
Staff Performance Appraisal Report GP 247 B (Revised 2008)
REPUBLIC OF KENYA Staff Performance Appraisal Report GP 247 B (Revised 2008) (For officers on Job Group G and below in the Civil Service and officers on salary scale 10 and below in Local Authorities)
POLICY STATEMENT AND REGULATIONS
POLICY STATEMENT AND REGULATIONS Number 100.16 EXEMPT STAFF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL POLICY POLICY: All exempt District staff shall have their performance reviewed 1) twice during any probationary period
University Appraisal Scheme
University Appraisal Scheme 1. Policy Statement 1.1 Cardiff University recognises the need to develop all staff to allow them to meet their full potential and make a valued contribution to the institution
UC MERCED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Employee Name: Payroll Title: Bargaining Unit: Percent Appointment: Employee ID: Review Period: Department: Length of time in this position: Supervisor s Name: Supervised for entire review period? If not
HR Division Professorial Appraisal Review System Quick Start Guide for System Users
HR Division Professorial Appraisal Review System Quick Start Guide for System Users Niyi Akinmutande 15/7/2009 UCL HR & Management Systems May 2009 doc author: AD HR Ops and Information 1 of 14 15/7/2009
If contract or probation indicate start date: end Date:
Preamble Staff Performance Appraisal is part of the Performance Management System of Kyambogo University. It is used as a management tool for establishing the extent to which set targets within overall
Support Services Evaluation Handbook
Support Services Evaluation Handbook for members of Paraprofessionals and School-Related Personnel (PRSP), Baltimore Teachers Union, Local 340 City Union of Baltimore (CUB), Local 800 Baltimore City Public
Exempt Performance Reviews. Date Approved: June 23, 2008 Last Edited: June 3, 2014
Page: 1 Policy The performance review process is a formal communication which is an integral part of performance management and is tied to compensation. All exempt and management employees will have an
PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND APPRAISAL FORM MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL
Employee Name: Position Title: Department: Supervisor Name: Date of Review: For Period: To At the beginning of each performance cycle, employee and supervisor establish performance objectives based on
Harbour School. Performance Management Policy. Version: 2.01. Learning & Achieving Together
Harbour School Learning & Achieving Together Performance Management Policy Version: 2.01 Date Released: 28 th November 2012 1 Please note: This is a model policy for the effective appraisal staff in schools
EMPLOYEE INFORMATION
EMPLOYEE INFORMATION Date Last Name MI First Name Position/Title Current Pay Grade Department/Division or Section Original Hire Date Performance Review Period Date Appointed to Current Position From: Supervisor
DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE
DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE Faculty of Engineering DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE MSc REGULATIONS AND PROCEDURES (Revised: September 2013) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. MSC ADMISSION REQUIREMENTS 1.1 Application
CODE: E.003 Financial Services BUDGET AND BUSINESS PLANNING POLICY. 1.2 The essential activities covered by this policy include:
BUDGET AND BUSINESS PLANNING POLICY CONTENTS 1.1 Budget and business planning is undertaken to support strategic planning and decision-making and to serve accountability by enabling administration to plan
Medical Appraisal Guide
A guide to medical appraisal for revalidation in England March 2013 (reissued with updated hyperlinks September 2014) www.england.nhs.uk/revalidation/ Contents Introduction 3 Purpose and context 4 Primary
University of Colorado Health Sciences Center Administrative Policy for Faculty Compensation
Policy: 1 Page: 1 of 8 I. Purpose, Reference, and Responsibility A. Purpose The purpose of this policy is to establish guidelines for faculty compensation. B. Reference 1. University of Colorado Administrative
Performance and Development Review and Pay Progression Policy
Performance and Development Review and Pay Progression Policy To receive this document in large print, Braille, audio or a language other than English, please contact the Corporate Diversity Team on 01375
Wan Bao Construction Limited. Environmental Procedure
Wan Bao Construction Limited Environmental Procedure (EP-03) Revision No. : 1 Date : 1 1 2006 Prepared by : Y.C. Chan (EMR) Approved by : K.T. Wong (General Manager) Revision History Revision Sections
Maintaining employees focus and motivation is essential if they are to make a full contribution to your business.
Maintaining employees focus and motivation is essential if they are to make a full contribution to your business. appraisals actively involve employees in understanding what is expected of them. By setting
Performance Management Handbook. City of American Canyon
Performance Management Handbook City of American Canyon 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Background on performance management City Core competencies Performance management model Development of the Core
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT POLICY
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT POLICY Updated July 2010 2007 1 CONTENTS Page 1 Purpose 3 2 Scope of the policy 3 Policy Framework 4 Roles and Responsibilities 5 Introduction to performance management in HelpAge
Project Management Fact Sheet:
Project Management Fact Sheet: Project Documentation Version: 2.2, November 2008 DISCLAIMER This material has been prepared for use by Tasmanian Government agencies and Instrumentalities. It follows that
WORCESTERSHIRE MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIP NHS TRUST GATEWAY POLICY
WORCESTERSHIRE MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIP NHS TRUST GATEWAY POLICY This policy should be read in conjunction with Worcestershire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust Policy Data Unique Identifier: HR015
Code of Practice for Postgraduate Research Degrees 2015-2016
Code of Practice for Postgraduate Research Degrees 2015-2016 This Code of Practice must be read in conjunction with the General Regulations for Students, the Postgraduate Research Degree Regulations and
Appraisal Policy for Learning Support Assistants
Appraisal Policy for Learning Support Assistants INTRODUCTION This policy is based on the Hertfordshire model policy May 2013. Performance management recognises and values strengths and supports colleagues
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY GRADUATE STUDENT / ADVISOR HANDBOOK DOCTORAL DEGREE PROGRAM. College of Education. University of Arizona
1 DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY GRADUATE STUDENT / ADVISOR HANDBOOK DOCTORAL DEGREE PROGRAM College of Education University of Arizona Revised March 2014 2 DOCTORAL PLAN OF STUDY AND DEGREE FORMS
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT & APPRAISAL SYSTEM
VERSION 2.1 July 2007 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT & APPRAISAL SYSTEM Government of Jamaica STAFF HANDBOOK FOR STAFF MEMBERS IN CENTRAL GOVERNMENT Developed and maintained by the Office of the Cabinet TABLE
A. An estimation of the soundness of the applicant s proposal, such as:
Revised 08/15 SABBATICAL LEAVE GUIDELINES University policy provides for the granting of sabbatical leaves for the purpose of professional improvement of the faculty. Such leaves are not automatic with
MASTER OF SOCIAL WORK PRACTICUM MANUAL
FACULTY OF SOCIAL WORK MASTER OF SOCIAL WORK PRACTICUM MANUAL August 2014 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Where to Find the Required Forms... 4 Glossary of Terms... 5 Introduction... 8 The MSW Field Practicum... 9
Classified Staff and Service Professional Performance Appraisal
Classified Staff and Service Professional Performance Appraisal EMPLOYEE INFORMATION Employee Name:Dana Jones NAU ID (not SSN): 1234567 Date: 7/30/08 Title: Fiscal Operations Manager Department: Graduate
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM Name: Job Title: Date: Department: Type of Appraisal: Annual Probationary Self Evaluation Appraisal Period: From: To: Instructions: Please carefully review the employee
APPENDIX 6: MASTER OF ARTS THESIS REQUIREMENTS (POLI 697 and 698)
APPENDIX 6: MASTER OF ARTS THESIS REQUIREMENTS (POLI 697 and 698) The Thesis Proposal must be approved in writing, first by the Thesis Supervisor before and then by the Thesis Committee. The Thesis Supervisor
PERFORMANCE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
PERFORMANCE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Document Number SOP2009-056 File No. 08/470-02 (D009/8429) Date issued 16 September 2009 Author Branch Director Workforce Unit Branch contact Strategic Projects Coordinator
Graduate Student Handbook
Graduate Student Handbook College of Agricultural and Life Sciences Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences 2015-2016 2 Department of Family, Youth and Community Sciences This brief handbook specifies
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROCEDURE
APPENDIX 4 Function: HR Version Number: 1 Introduction: To assist to ensure Council is well placed in its corporate area, to achieve its Objectives and Strategic Goal to provide leadership and ensure community
S A COUNCIL FOR THE PROPERTY VALUERS PROFESSION
Policy and Procedures Document : S A COUNCIL FOR THE PROPERTY VALUERS PROFESSION Accreditation of University and University of Technology Programmes, leading to registration as a candidate valuer. The
Employee Self-Evaluation Form
Employee Self-Evaluation Form Employee Name: Job Title: Department: Performance Review Period: From: JANUARY 1, 2013 To: DECEMBER 31, 2013 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Complete each performance area described
Doctoral Regulations of the Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences
FACULTEIT PSYCHOLOGIE EN PEDAGOGISCHE WETENSCHAPPEN Doctoral Regulations of the Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences Dutch version unanimously approved by the Faculty Board on September 17, 2014
Clare College Cambridge
Clare College Cambridge Staff Training and Development Policy Clare College is committed to the support of staff development for all staff. The key purpose is to facilitate personal and professional development
Online Appraisal Software
Online Appraisal Software Our system is web based enabling companies to execute efficient and effective appraisals for their employees. The system is driven by staff objectives, competencies & core development
MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE Date of Appraisal: Evaluating Manager: Division Head: LAST NAME FIRST INITIAL DATE HIRED DEPARTMENT / DIVISION JOB TITLE PURPOSES
Frequently Asked Questions for: Settlement Disputes System Submittal Process
Frequently Asked Questions for: Settlement Disputes System Submittal Process California ISO. Copyright 2011. All Rights Reserved TABLE OF CONTENTS SETTLEMENT DISPUTE SYSTEM... 3 Q1: What is a settlement
Mendip Edge Federation
Mendip Edge Federation Fairlands Middle School POLICY FOR APPRAISING TEACHER PERFORMANCE Contents PURPOSE... 2 APPLICATION OF THE APPRAISAL POLICY... 2 THE APPRAISAL PERIOD... 2 SETTING OBJECTIVES... 3
MASTER OF SOCIAL WORK MSW PRACTICUM MANUAL
FACULTY OF SOCIAL WORK MASTER OF SOCIAL WORK MSW PRACTICUM MANUAL SEPTEMBER 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Where to find required forms... 3 Where to find completed practicum reports... 3 INTRODUCTION... 4 THE
Appraisal (Performance Management) A practical guide. Appraisees Appraisers NASUWT. The Teachers Union. The largest teachers union in the UK
Appraisal (Performance Management) A practical guide Appraisees Appraisers NASUWT The Teachers Union The largest teachers union in the UK Important Information This practical guide is written in the context
Date Submitted: October 1, 2013. Unit: The Office of Institutional Research, Planning, and Effectiveness I. MISSION STATEMENT
1 EMORY UNIVERSITY 2012 2013 Assessment Report for Administrative and Educational Support Units Assessment Period Covered: September 1, 2012 August 31, 2013 Unit: The Office of Institutional Research,
Learning Spaces will be allocated by the automated timetable system based on suitability and rooms will be utilised appropriately based on capacity.
Timetable and Class Registration Procedure Intent This procedure will be used to inform the scheduling requirements for the University s annual class timetable publication, class registration planning
Performance Appraisal Policy For Teachers
Performance Appraisal Policy For Teachers Department: Schools HR Advisory Team Author: Ruth Alinek Original date of Issue: April 2012 Latest Review: May 2013 Version: 3 Hertfordshire County Council 2012.
HANDBOOK PUBLIC SERVICE STAFF PERFORMANCE PLANNING PERFORMANCE REVIEW PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DECISION-MAKING
HANDBOOK PUBLIC SERVICE STAFF PERFORMANCE PLANNING PERFORMANCE REVIEW PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DECISION-MAKING 6/30/2010 2: TABLE OF CONTENT WHAT IS THE STAFF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM... 3 Phase One
SAFETY COMMITTEE ANNUAL PLAN TEMPLATE
SAFETY COMMITTEE ANNUAL PLAN TEMPLATE The safety committee and the unit administration work together in promoting the unit s safety and health efforts. The Safety Committee Annual Plan provides a blueprint
Department of Interior Design Handbook
Department of Interior Design Handbook Table of Contents 1 Introduction, Department Overview, and Masters Programs... 2 Program Timelines... 2.1 Environmental Design 3 (Interior Environments Option) Timeline...
Accreditation of qualifications for registration as an oral health practitioner
Accreditation of qualifications for registration as an oral health practitioner Purpose Approved by the Dental Council: August 2005 Updated: May 2008 Governance Structure Update: 8 August 2011 Updated:
Performance Evaluation System (PES) Instruction Guide
Performance Evaluation System (PES) Instruction Guide The State of New Jersey Performance Evaluation System (PES) Program Completion Instructions INTRODUCTION Performance assessment is an important part
Pittsburg State University Graduate School Thesis Guide. Requirements and Guidelines For the Preparation of a Master s Thesis
Pittsburg State University Graduate School Thesis Guide Requirements and Guidelines For the Preparation of a Master s Thesis Approved by the Graduate Council April 13, 2005 1 Introduction The Master s
Master s of Science in Educational Psychology Graduate School of Education George Mason University EDEP 799
Master s of Science in Educational Psychology Graduate School of Education EDEP 799 Guidelines for Educational Psychology Thesis Goals and Objectives (6/07/2010) The Educational Psychology Thesis is intended
Graduate Certificate in University Teaching Handbook
Graduate Certificate in University Teaching Handbook Contents Overview of Graduate Certificate in University Teaching... 2 Program Overview... 2 Why a Graduate Certificate in University Teaching at Concordia?...
PERFORMANCE & PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME Launched: April 2010
PERFORMANCE & PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME Launched: April 2010 1 PERFORMANCE & PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME INDEX Page Introduction 3 PPDP Cycle 4 Performance planning meeting 5 Performance planning
Boston University. 2015 Performance Evaluation Program. Administrative Employees Exempt and Non-Exempt
Boston University 2015 Performance Evaluation Program Administrative Employees Exempt and Non-Exempt (excludes staff covered by Collective Bargaining Agreements and Certain Contracts) October 2015 TABLE
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT AND KSF ANNUAL REVIEW
SECTION: HUMAN RESOURCES POLICY AND PROCEDURE No: 10.16 NATURE AND SCOPE: SUBJECT: POLICY AND PROCEDURE TRUST WIDE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT AND KSF ANNUAL REVIEW This policy explains the Performance
BUTLER UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT GUIDE
BUTLER UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT GUIDE Performance management is the methodical and organized system for monitoring the results of work activities, collecting information and evaluating performance,
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT TRAINING
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT TRAINING Performance management is an ongoing process rather than a once a year occurrence. It s a way for you as the supervisor to motivate and develop your employees, and to assist
Retention, Promotion and Tenure (RPT) Overview. California State University, Stanislaus
Retention, Promotion and Tenure (RPT) Overview California State University, Stanislaus Processes and Procedures Two Formal Submission Times FALL - typically around September 15-20 th annually (NOTE: This
Disability Employment Services Quality Framework Advice V 2.0
Disability Employment Services Quality Framework Advice V 2.0 Disclaimer This document is not a stand-alone document and does not contain the entirety of Disability Employment Services Providers' obligations.
Institutional Quality Assurance Process. University of Ottawa
Institutional Quality Assurance Process University of Ottawa June 27, 2011 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION...1 1.1 Authorities...1 1.2 Contact person...1 1.3 Definitions...1 1.4 Evaluation of programs...2
Procedure for Master s Degree Thesis Defense, Graduate Institute of Art History, National Taiwan Normal University
Procedure for Master s Degree Thesis Defense, Graduate Institute of Art History, National Taiwan Normal University Passed at the General Affairs Committee, June 13, 2011 Revisions passed at the General
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (QMS) for SCHOOL BASED EDUCATORS
ANNEXURE A QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (QMS) for SCHOOL BASED EDUCATORS Draft (revised 08 May 2012) ( 2 nd revision : 25 June 2012) (3 rd revision: 2 August 2012) (4 th revision: 19 March 2013) (5 th revision:
Employee Performance Management Policy and Procedure
Employee Performance Management Policy and Procedure Document Control Document Ref: HREPM001 Date Created: Sept 2007 Version: 1.4 Date Modified: April 2015 Revision due Author: Jane Milone Sign & Date:
STATE BOARD FOR TECHNICAL AND COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION PROCEDURE
PAGE: 1 of 17 TITLE: EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (EPMS) (REVIEW DATE OPTION) POLICY REFERENCE NUMBER: 8-4-100 DIVISION OF RESPONSIBILITY: Human Resource Services DATE OF LAST REVISION: May 13,
JOB PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Monroe County Community College Administrators. Name: Position: Supervisor: Evaluation Period:
JOB PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Monroe County Community College Administrators Name: Position: Supervisor: Evaluation Period: Instructions: Supervisors write comments to describe the work performance in each
Remember - they are not you and when you did their job you did not have you as a manager. You need to obtain feedback on your performance, also.
It is vital to spend some thinking time really appreciating what the individual has to do in their job. Make no assumptions at this stage; bear in mind that: i) You may know the appraisee s job, you may
To be used in conjunction with the Invitation to Tender for Consultancy template.
GUIDANCE NOTE Tendering for, choosing and managing a consultant Using this guidance This information is not intended to be prescriptive, but for guidance only. Appointing consultants for relatively small
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (HRMS)
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (HRMS) DOCUMENTATION OF BEST PRACTICE FEBRUARY 2011 Researched and Documented By: OneWorld Foundation India 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary... 3 Background... 4 Objective...
Guidelines for Thesis
MA Program in Psychology Webster University Leiden Behavioral & Social Sciences (BSS) Department Course Description Guidelines for Thesis The master s thesis consists of an individual research project
ALLENTOWN INFECTIOUS DISEASES PERFORMANCE REVIEW Billing Specialist
ALLENTOWN INFECTIOUS DISEASES PERFORMANCE REVIEW Billing Specialist Name: Job Title: Start Supervisor: Review Meeting with Review Period: To Date Reviewed: Overall Rating: Instructions Before completing
Recruitment and Retention Guidance Appraisal and 360º feedback
Recruitment and Retention Guidance Appraisal and 360º feedback Page 1 The main purpose of an Appraisal is to assist employees to develop their performance which in turn will contribute to the overall development
DOUGLAS COUNTY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL MANUAL (Non-Supervisory Employees) TABLE OF CONTENTS
DOUGLAS COUNTY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL MANUAL (Non-Supervisory Employees) TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM DESCRIPTION PAGE(S) Section I Introduction 1-2 Section
Performance Appraisal Review for Exempt Employees
Client Company Performance Appraisal Review for Exempt Employees Employee Name Department Title Date Started Current Position Date of Review Current Supervisor Instructions Review employee s performance
Performance Management Policy
O & M Lesedi PV Plant Performance Management Policy REVISION DATE OF RELEASE PURPOSE Initial Draft December, 2014 Initial Release Revised Draft 1 February, 2015 Amended after MC comments Approvals: NAME
Ratings Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Improvement Needed
The staff appraisal process is an on-going communications process that begins with the identification of performance goals by the supervisor in the fall. During the spring semester, a formal appraisal
