SECTION I GENERAL JOB RESPONSIBILITIES



Similar documents
University of Mississippi Medical Center Employee Performance Review Form. Employee Position Title: Employee Job Code: Employee Grade:

POLICY STATEMENT AND REGULATIONS

Staff Performance Evaluation

Performance Appraisal

Performance Evaluation Guide for Classified Staff Employees. Classified Staff Performance Evaluation Program

GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CLASSIFIED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL RECORD FOR NON-SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEE NAME: EMPLOYEE IDENTIFICATION #:

UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH Joint Employee Performance Appraisal Form

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL (Non-Exempt)

Alexander County Performance Evaluation Policy

The University of Southern Mississippi Performance Appraisal Instructions

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM

Performance Evaluation Program. for Classified Staff Employees

MILLSAPS COLLEGE ANNUAL EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION For Exempt and Nonexempt Staff

GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CLASSIFIED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL RECORD FOR SUPERVISORY/MANAGERIAL EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEE NAME: EMPLOYEE IDENTIFICATION #:

The Bureau of Public Service System PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM

Employee Performance Review. Reference Guide

Performance Appraisal System to Improve Construction Productivity paper submitted to International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH, FOUNDATION EMPLOYEE PLANNING & PERFORMANCE REVIEW

Employee Development Plan

Performance Review (Non-Exempt Employees)

Date Started Current Position. Instructions

University of Maryland Nonexempt Staff PRD Form

CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ROCKFORD EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

IC Performance Standards

Performance Appraisal Review for Exempt Employees

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL NON-ACADEMIC ADMINISTRATIVE - SUPERVISORY

WINTHROP UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM POLICY AND PROCEDURE

Town of Sunapee Supervisory Performance Evaluation. Employee Last First Middle. Probationary progress Conclusion of probation

Manager / Supervisor Performance Review

Writing and Conducting Successful Performance Appraisals. Guidelines for Managers and Supervisors

PART II GUIDE TO CONDUCTING A SUCCESSFUL PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL BEFORE

Performance Appraisal System

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW

Cleveland State Community College. Classified Employee Performance Review

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

Association of Municipal Administrators The Voice of Municipal Administrators

Performance Review Process Guidelines Nova Southeastern University

Performance Appraisal Handbook

DEPAUW UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROGRAM Hourly Employees

Interviews management and executive level candidates; serves as interviewer for position finalists.

Performance Evaluation. August 20, 2013

Performance Evaluation Form: Part-Time & Seasonal Employees

CONSISTENTLY EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS OF JOB REQUIREMENTS

Online Performance Management Review Form

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FOR MIDDLE MANAGEMENT

POLICE OFFICER (EMPLOYEE) EVALUATION

HR09a ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW (Employee)

ST. THOMAS UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM WITH SUPERVISORY DUTIES

~~4 <l,.p. Human Resources Director

Initial Review 6 month Review Annual Other. Immediate Supervisor: Position Title: DRAFT

Employee s Name: Susan Jones. Title: Administrative Officer. Supervisor: Marcia Meadows. Date: April 2, 200x

Example: Box Elder District Classified Employee Evaluation and Improvement Report

F. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM

GLOBAL FINANCIAL PRIVATE CAPITAL, LLC. Job Description. JOB TITLE: Compliance Director

STATE BOARD FOR TECHNICAL AND COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

State of Hawai'i EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL HRD 526 (Rev. 9/05)

State of Hawai'i EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL HRD 526 (Rev. 9/05)

How To Be A Successful Employee

RULES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CHAPTER 60L-35 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (Part-Time non-benefited staff only)

Performance Management

Oregon University System

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

STATE BOARD FOR TECHNICAL AND COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION PROCEDURE

GLOBAL FINANCIAL PRIVATE CAPITAL Job Description. JOB TITLE: Client Relationship Manager

Manchester Community Schools Bus Driver Performance Appraisal

ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR NONFACULTY EMPLOYEES BANNER EMPLOYEE ID NUMBER:

CENTRAL STATE UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM

TOWN OF NEEDHAM PUBLIC WORKS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION POLICY #419

Teacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Plan. Maine Township High School District 207. Our mission is to improve student learning.

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Employee Performance Review

Performance Evaluation

DESCRIBING OUR COMPETENCIES. new thinking at work

PENNSYLVANIA STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW

County of Orange Department of Fire & EMS Employee Performance Evaluation Company Officer. Hire Date: Period Covered:

College of Design. Merit Pay Rating System. Merit Rating System

PRESENTATION ON PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL BY: LOUISE AGYEMAN-BARNING

CITY OF GUNNISON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM 2013

Performance Management. Writing Performance Assessments and Goals 2014

Employee Self-Evaluation Form

Sample Internship Forms

County of Mono. Performance Evaluation System. Job Performance Expectations and Standards

Clinical Social Work Team Leader

COMMUNITY HOSPITAL NURSE PRACTITIONER/PHYSICIAN ASST

Part One: Review of Performance Elements Rating Scale

Module 2 An Introduction to. The Performance Appraisal System

Employee Performance Review and Development (Non-Exempt)

DOUGLAS COUNTY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL MANUAL (Non-Supervisory Employees) TABLE OF CONTENTS

Duty Station: Appraisal Period: From: To: Employee: Rating Official: Reviewing Official (if applicable*): Employee: Date: Rating Official: Date:

INTRODUCTION...1 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT REFERENCE CHECKS...2

Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport Authority. Performance Evaluation System Guide

VOLUNTARY SUPPLEMENTAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

JOB DESCRIPTION HUMAN RESOURCES GENERALIST

Transcription:

NIPISSING UNIVERSITY ADMINISTRATIVE EMPLOYEE EVALUATION The purpose of this employee evaluation is to assess performance/skill levels, improve communication and pin-point strengths and weaknesses identified during the trial period or probationary period. Employee: Position Title: Department: Employee Status: Full-time Part-time Appraisal period: From: To: PERFORMANCE REVIEW AREAS PERFORMANCE STANDARD RATINGS I. GENERAL JOB RESPONSIBILITIES This section is a review of the employee s professional capabilities, personal qualities, and characteristics common to all employees at Nipissing University II. III. IV. SPECIFIC JOB RESPONSIBILITIES This section is a review of the employee s performance of the major functions (responsibilities) as listed on the position description. STRENGTHS/WEAKNESSES This section is for the supervisor to comment on the strengths and weaknesses and how the former can be used effectively, and the latter strengthened. EMPLOYEE COMMENTS This section is for the employee to comment on his/her review and interview General and specific job responsibilities have standard definitions. The standards help ensure equity among departments and raters. The standard ratings for general job responsibilities are attached. Specific job responsibilities are as follows: The employee does not meet the requirements of the job Consult Director of Human Resources before conducting the performance appraisal. The employee usually does not meet the requirements of the job. Improvement is necessary. The employee usually exceeds the requirements of the job. The employee always exceeds the requirements of the job. The employee s performance clearly exceeds the requirements of the job.

SECTION I GENERAL JOB RESPONSIBILITIES 1. ATTENDANCE/PUNCTUALITY Adheres to established working hours and workdays. Never, during the rating period, has the employee been late or absent. At least once during the rating period, the employee has been late or absent. At least twice during the rating period, the employee has been late or absent. Once per month, the employee has been late or absent. More than once per month the employee has been late or absent. 2. POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Adheres to departmental and University policies and procedures. This employee has exceptional understanding of department and University policies and procedures, e.g., would be able to explain them to other employees, and would often be consulted by others. Never asks the same question more than once. This employee has received no disciplinary counselling during the rating period. He/she has a good understanding of department and University policies and procedures. Has made a definite effort to understand and only needs to ask questions once. This employee has received no disciplinary counselling during the rating period. Has a basic understanding of University and department policies and procedures, but occasionally asks routine questions that he/she should know. This employee has had at least one disciplinary counselling during the rating period. He/she has a marginal understanding of department policies and procedures and has made minimal effort to understand or learn them. Asks the same questions more than once. This employee has had more than one disciplinary counselling during the rating period. They have made little or no effort to learn University and department policies and procedures and are continually asking the same routine questions.

SECTION I GENERAL JOB RESPONSIBILITIES 3. COMMUNICATIONS - How effectively the employee produces written and oral communication that is clear, precise, and directed to the appropriate audience. Day to day written and oral communications are extremely effective. Written material is clear and extremely easy to understand. Language and vocabulary is always appropriate and understandable for someone seeing (or hearing) information for the first time. This employee can communicate effectively at all levels. The employee at this level may be as good at day-to-day oral or written communication on the outstanding level, but one or the other is not at the outstanding level. Written and oral communications are generally effective and easily understood. There are no communication problems between employee and those with which he/she works regularly. Employee has difficulty in communicating clearly or effectively. This employee's written communication requires the reader to seek clarification because it is unclear or confusing. This employee's oral communication may be unclear or may require the listener to seek additional information. Supervisor would generally avoid using this person for complicated or non-routine communication either oral or written. Written and oral communication by this employee requires the reader or listener to regularly seek additional information.

SECTION I GENERAL JOB RESPONSIBILITIES 4. PLANNING/ORGANIZING How effectively the employee organizes and accomplishes job assignments within time allotted, accurately, and with minimum supervision. Employee plans, organizes and monitors work projects in such a manner that maximum output is obtained. Work is usually done ahead of schedule and is of extreme high quality. Employee knows how to work within the system to get things done. Virtually never causes crises because of lack of planning. This employee is better than the majority of his/her peers at planning and organizing work assignments. Does not allow crises to occur because of lack of planning. This employee is fully capable of planning, organizing and monitoring work projects. They are completed satisfactorily and on time. Usually does not allow crises to occur because of lack of planning. Employee occasionally causes problems with others in the work area because of lack of planning and organizing of his/her work. Does not get work projects out on time or may have problems with monitoring of time to make most effective use of time. Employee rarely does assignments or work projects on time. Has extreme difficulty using time effectively. Has caused problems or crises in the work area because of lack of planning.

SECTION I GENERAL JOB RESPONSIBILITIES 5. DEPENDABILITY - How effectively the employee performs routine job functions, anticipates and is resourceful in making good decisions. Employee is extremely adept at finding creative and innovative solutions to complete routine problems. Is able to head off problems before they occur. Is able to quickly see solutions to problems that others have tried unsuccessfully to solve. Others regularly seek this person's help in finding solutions to problems. Can always depend on this person to do the job exceptionally well and go the extra mile. Employee is adept at finding creative and high quality solutions to problems for all but the extremely complex problems. Others may seek out this person for help in finding solutions. Frequently creates methods or procedures that head off problems. Does more than his/her job very well. Solutions are, at times, fairly creative and innovative. May reach solutions slightly faster than peers, or may rarely find solutions which other have missed. Devises good, workable solutions to problems as they occur but does not often anticipate problems. Does a good job on a steady basis. Employee has difficulty in finding workable solutions to non-routine problems. Occasionally misses routine problems that he/she should have been able to solve and rarely anticipates. Often cannot depend on this employee to do his/her job on a steady basis. This employee is never able to anticipate problems before they occur. Often cannot solve routine problems and cannot depend on him/her to do their job well on a steady basis.

SECTION I GENERAL JOB RESPONSIBILITIES 6. CONTRIBUTES TO POSITIVE WORK CLIMATE AND TEAM EFFORT - How effectively does the employee interact with fellow employees, and degree of cooperation. Employee has excellent insight into human behaviour, is able to work well with virtually everyone, subordinates, peers and superiors. Is able to see all sides and points of view and can maintain a professional working relationship with everyone. Virtually never loses his/her temper or says things that could damage a working relationship. Does not allow personal feelings or differences to affect the working relationship with others. Employee has very good insight into others behaviour and is able to work well with anyone, except in very unusual circumstances. Is able to create cooperative and professional relationships with almost anyone, subordinates, peers and superiors. Does not lose temper or alienate others. Deals in conflict situations without damaging the working relationship. Employee is good at working with others in most contexts, including conflict situations. Generally can develop a cooperative and professional relationship with others. Employee has difficulty understanding others points of view. In a conflict situation may damage the working relationship because of unprofessional or inappropriate behaviour. Employee sees situation as "them" or "us". Makes value judgments and allows conflict to interfere with performance of job. May engage in backstabbing kinds of behaviour.

SECTION I GENERAL JOB RESPONSIBILITIES 7. SELF-DEVELOPMENT AND APPRAISAL - How effectively employee analyzes own strengths and weaknesses, accepts constructive criticism. This employee continually seeks out constructive criticism from supervisors, peers, or subordinates. He/she uses this criticism to improve job performance and strengthen weaknesses. Seeks out ways to improve job skills, e.g.: takes classes and takes full advantage of tuition exemption. Participates in other program areas other than his/her specific service. This employee always accepts constructive criticism and may occasionally seek it out. Employee takes classes etc. to improve job performance. This employee accepts constructive criticism but does not seek it out. Will attend mandatory classes or seminars only. This employee has a difficult time accepting constructive criticism on his/her weaknesses or job performance. Makes a marginal effort to improve job performance or to attend necessary seminars, etc. This employee gets extremely defensive when given constructive criticism by subordinates, peers, or supervisors. Does not try at all to improve performance and only attends seminars and classes if not given any other option.

SECTION I GENERAL JOB RESPONSIBILITIES 8. QUALITY OF WORK - How effectively employee produces accurate, neat, thorough and acceptable work. Employee is considered to be an expert at his/her job, produces very high quality work, and is often consulted by peers and/or supervisor about unusual or non-routine aspects of the work. This employee is given problems others cannot handle. He/she has an exceptional grasp of the job and a clear understanding of how his/her job affects other services and departments. Employee is highly skilled at his/her job more than the majority of his/her co-workers. This employee is able to come up with creative solutions to problems. The overall quality of this person's work is higher than the majority of peers. Almost always does thorough and accurate work. Employee performs well on his/her job and is fully capable of solving routine problems. Produces thorough and accurate work the majority of the time. This employee consistently performs below level of other peers. Does not produce thorough or accurate work the majority of the time. This employee often needs assistance for routine work and individuals who utilize their services may complain of employees work being unsatisfactory.

SECTION I GENERAL JOB RESPONSIBILITIES 9. QUANTITY OF WORK - How effectively employee produces an acceptable amount of work within the allotted time and guidelines. Employee is extremely productive and puts out more work than almost all co-workers. Employee has skills in time management, planning and organizing. Wastes very little time "relaxing" socializing or engaging in other non-job-related activities. Employee is very productive and puts out more work than all but a few co-workers. Does not waste much time "relaxing", socializing or engaging in other non-job-related activities. This employee is fully productive and puts out as much work as the majority of his/her co-workers. Does not waste much time "relaxing", socializing or engaging in other non-job-related activities. This employee produces less than the majority of co-workers. Has had a few "blatant" periods of wasting time and ineffective work habits which reduce the overall work output. This employee produces less work than almost anyone else in the work area. Employee routinely wastes time, and socializes.

NARRATIVE SUMMARY/COMMENTS REGARDING THE GENERAL JOB RESPONSIBILITIES:

SECTION II SPECIFIC JOB RESPONSIBILITIES List the major functions (responsibilities) as listed on the position description. Please list in order of priority, with the most important listed first. Review and assess each responsibility. Record improvements, if any, that could be made. List the factors affecting the performance of principal responsibilities. Assessment: Improvements: Factors: List the major functions (responsibilities) as listed on the position description. Please list in order of priority, with the most important listed first. Review and assess each responsibility. Record improvements, if any, that could be made. List the factors affecting the performance of principal responsibilities. Assessment: Improvements: Factors:

SECTION II SPECIFIC JOB RESPONSIBILITIES List the major functions (responsibilities) as listed on the position description. Please list in order of priority, with the most important listed first. Review and assess each responsibility. Record improvements, if any, that could be made. List the factors affecting the performance of principal responsibilities. Assessment: Improvements: Factors: List the major functions (responsibilities) as listed on the position description. Please list in order of priority, with the most important listed first. Review and assess each responsibility. Record improvements, if any, that could be made. List the factors affecting the performance of principal responsibilities. Assessment: Improvements: Factors:

SECTION II SPECIFIC JOB RESPONSIBILITIES List the major functions (responsibilities) as listed on the position description. Please list in order of priority, with the most important listed first. Review and assess each responsibility. Record improvements, if any, that could be made. List the factors affecting the performance of principal responsibilities. Assessment: Improvements: Factors: List the major functions (responsibilities) as listed on the position description. Please list in order of priority, with the most important listed first. Review and assess each responsibility. Record improvements, if any, that could be made. List the factors affecting the performance of principal responsibilities. Assessment: Improvements: Factors:

SECTION II SPECIFIC JOB RESPONSIBILITIES List the major functions (responsibilities) as listed on the position description. Please list in order of priority, with the most important listed first. Review and assess each responsibility. Record improvements, if any, that could be made. List the factors affecting the performance of principal responsibilities. Assessment: Improvements: Factors: List the major functions (responsibilities) as listed on the position description. Please list in order of priority, with the most important listed first. Review and assess each responsibility. Record improvements, if any, that could be made. List the factors affecting the performance of principal responsibilities. Assessment: Improvements: Factors:

SECTION III STRENGTHS & WEAKNESSES STRENGTHS 1. 2. 3. These strengths can be used effectively by doing the following: WEAKNESSES 1. 2. 3. These weaknesses can be strengthened or improved by doing the following:

SECTION IV EMPLOYEE COMMENTS Employee s Signature: Supervisor s Signature: Director of Human Resources Signature: Date: Date: Date: H:\USER\HRPOSI\PROBATION\ADMIN11.docx