State of Hawai'i EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL HRD 526 (Rev. 9/05)
|
|
|
- Letitia Maxwell
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 State of Hawai'i EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL HRD 526 (Rev. 9/05) Section #1 Name of Employee Position Title XXX-XX- Social Security No. Position No. Salary Range/Step Bargaining Unit Section #2 Department Division/Branch PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL CATEGORIES & EXPECTATIONS (Complete this section by the beginning of the rating period.) a. Goals/Projects: List any specific goals/projects, unless noted on other documents, to be accomplished during this rating period. Supervisor's Signature Date b. Supervisor's discussion with employee: My current job description, job related performance requirements, and the Performance Appraisal System process have been discussed with me. I received a copy of the PAS Summary for Employees. Employee's Signature Date Section #3 OVERALL RATING (Complete at the end of the appraisal period) Appraisal: Initial Prob New Prob Annual Partial Annual Appraisal Period: From: To: Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Does Not Meet Expectations Section #4 SIGNATURES UPON COMPLETION OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Employee's Acknowledgement/Comments: My performance for the rating period has been discussed with me. I understand that I may rebut this rating by attaching my comments. Supervisor's Certification: This rating was discussed with the employee on the following date: My signature does not necessarily mean agreement. (Check if comments attached.) Supervisor's Signature Date Signature of Reviewing Officer Date Employee's Signature Date Signature of Appointing Authority Date
2 SUMMARY INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORMS, HRD 526, 527, 528, and 529 (Refer to Performance Appraisal System Supervisory Manual, Revised July 2001, for more detailed information) Section #1: Section #2: Review preprinted information for errors. Check with your Departmental Personnel Office before changing/adding information. Phase 1 - Performance Planning, Communication of Performance Expectations/Requirements, and Goals/Projects List any special goals/projects (related to employee's class of work), unless noted on other documents, to be completed during the rating period. If additional goals/projects are set during the rating period or original goals/projects are changed, discuss them with your employee at the time. Additional categories (i.e., "Optional" categories) may be selected if they apply to the employee's position by placing a checkmark ( ) in the appropriate boxes before meeting with the employee. Blue-collar nonsupervisory workers should be rated on Performance Categories 1-5 only (i.e., "Fixed" categories), unless you strongly feel some of the "Optional" categories are applicable. Meet with the employee at the beginning or shortly after the start of the rating period to discuss how the PAS works. Explain the Performance Categories and your expectations/requirements to the employee. Explain how the employee can get an "Exceeds Expectations" rating. Inform the employee that if he/she gets a "Does Not Meet Expectations" rating in even one "Significant Category," noted by asterisk ("*"), the "Overall Rating will be "Does Not Meet Expectations". Ask employee to sign. 1 Sections #5 & 6: Phase II - Performance Monitoring and Coaching Observe, monitor, and coach the employee throughout the rating period. Talk to the employee throughout the rating period about his/her work performance. Record on the Supervisor's Discussion Notes Form, HRD 529, (SDN) significant incidents of outstanding and/or substandard work performance. If the notes describe performance problems/deficiencies, be sure to follow the steps in the PAS Supervisory Manual under "Documentation." Discuss these notes with the employee and ask him/her to initial the form. 1 Give the employee a copy of any notes describing performance problems/deficiencies. Encourage the employee to talk with you throughout the rating period about any job-related questions or concerns. Sections #3, 4, 5: Phase III - Completion of the Appraisal Review the following and other relevant documents, which can help you to objectively rate the employee. * Performance expectations/requirements established in Phase I, Performance Planning. * Performance Categories, especially the Significant Categories of Quality & Quantity & Timeliness. * Supervisor's Discussion Notes (HRD 529). * Conditions beyond the employee's control that may have affected the employee's performance. Complete Section #3, "Overall Rating," based on the Final Ratings for the "Significant Categories." * An Overall "Exceeds Expectations" rating must be supported by notes on the SDN. * An Overall "Does Not Meet Expectations" may not be given unless the employee was first given a "Notice to Improve Performance" and given a reasonable period, up to three months, to bring the employee s performance to a satisfactory level. * You may use the "Supervisor's Comments" column to make any general employee performance comments. Set up a meeting with your employee to discuss the rating. * Encourage feedback from your employee. * Allow the employee to make written comments or a rebuttal on a separate sheet. * Have the employee sign Section #4. 1 Begin Phase I again for the next rating period. Give the employee a copy of the appraisal forms after the Reviewing Officer and the Appointing Authority sign the form. 1 In phases I, II, & III if the employee does not wish to sign/initial the form, note: Employee does not wish to sign/ initial. You may ask a witness to date/sign, if necessary. Be careful the witness does not see confidential information.
3 Name of Employee Section #5 PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES FOR WORKERS AND WORKING SUPERVISORS Appraisal Period: XXX-XX- From: To: Social Security No. FINAL RATING Expectations SUPERVISOR'S COMMENTS At the end of the rating period, use this column to make any general comments on the employee's performance. (BLUE COLLAR; WHITE COLLAR; REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL NURSE; INSTITUTIONAL, HEALTH & CORRECTIONAL WORKER; FIREFIGHTER; PROFESSIONAL & SCIENTIFIC) Exceeds Meets Does Not Meet Significant Categories are noted by "*" 1 2 *QUALITY OF WORK Usually: completes assigned work in accordance with work expectations. For example, work is usually accurate, neat, and/or complete. *QUALITY OF WORK UNIT OUTPUT Usually: work unit completes assigned work in accordance with work expectations. For example, work unit output is usually accurate, neat, and/or complete. *QUANTITY & TIMELINESS OF WORK Usually: produces amount of work in accordance with work expectations; completes work on schedule. *QUANTITY & TIMELINESS OF WORK UNIT OUTPUT Usually: work unit produces amount of work expected; completes work on schedule. THE CATEGORIES BELOW MAY AFFECT THE RATINGS FOR QUALITY, QUANTITY & TIMELINESS RELIABILITY & INITIATIVE Usually: accepts responsibility; is flexible and, when 3 requested, adjusts to varying job situations; and/or initiates work independently, as required for the job. RELATIONSHIPS WITH OTHERS Usually: works well with supervisor, team members, and/or others on assignments; accepts suggestions for 4 improvement; is cordial when serving the public; and/or provides information, help, and/or coverage to others when needed. 5 SAFETY & USE OF EQUIPMENT Demonstrates possession and application of the knowledge of safety practices, rules, and procedures of the profession; uses and operates equipment in a safe manner; and maintains tools, equipment and other apparatus, including office related equipment, in a safe and acceptable manner. Instructs and monitors subordinates to follow safety rules and regulations. HRD 527 (Rev. 9/05)
4 Section #5 (Page 2) PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES FOR WORKERS AND WORKING SUPERVISORS 6 Exceeds Meets Does Not Meet CHECK ADDITIONAL CATEGORIES BELOW IF APPLY TO EMPLOYEE COMMUNICATION Usually: demonstrates oral and/or writing skills as required for the job. Usually: demonstrates oral and/or writing skills as required for the job; and/or demonstrates open communication by sharing information and encouraging subordinate participation/feedback. JOB KNOWLEDGE Usually: demonstrates knowledge of theoretical, practical, and/or routine aspects of present job in accordance with work expectations; works with minimal direction; applies the correct instructions, 7 guidelines, policies, procedures, and rules to assigned work; remains up-to-date on current trends in the profession; offers ideas, concepts, techniques, and/or creative solutions; and/or seeks new approaches to simplify and/or improve procedures, techniques, and processes. PROBLEM SOLVING & DECISION MAKING Usually: identifies and clearly defines problems as they arise; accumulates and analyzes relevant 8 information; uses discretion/judgement to select workable solutions to problems; presents alternative solutions when making recommendations; and/or gets opinions of others, when needed. PLANNING, ORGANIZATION, SETTING PRIORITIES Usually: prioritizes assignments satisfactorily to minimize crisis situations; shows foresight to prevent 9 potential problems and works in contingencies when making short- and/or long-term plans; proposes and reviews benchmarks to monitor work progress and makes work plan adjustments as needed; and/or follows up on assignments. 10 OTHER (Add, if needed) SUPERVISOR'S COMMENTS ALSO COMPLETE CATEGORIES BELOW FOR WORKING SUPERVISOR SUPERVISION Usually: monitors work unit progress; provides adequate direction, training, and coaching to staff; takes/recommends the appropriate corrective and/or 11 disciplinary action when needed; provides needed help and/or training for employees with performance problems; encourages career growth for staff members; and/or provides equal opportunity/treatment in all aspects of supervision. APPRAISING SUBORDINATES Usually: follows performance appraisal policies, guidelines, and procedures; communicates 12 performance expectations at the beginning of the rating period; oversees and monitors employee performance; and/or rates subordinates (or recommends ratings) objectively, on time, and on work expectations.
5 Section #6 EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SUPERVISOR'S DISCUSSION NOTES HRD 529 (Rev. 9/05) Appraisal Period: Name of Employee XXX-XX- From: To: Social Security Number 1. Use this sheet to keep a record of employee performance throughout the rating period, especially incidents of outstanding and/or substandard work performance. I 2. Indicate the Performance Category number from Section #5 in the first column (e.g., the number of Quality of Work Unit Output N is #1). S 3. Be sure to have timely discussions with your employee for all notes made. If a notation describes substandard performance/ T deficiencies, you must also: R A. Give the employee suggestions on how to improve performance. If suggestions are given orally, you must also include U the following phrase in the notation: "I discussed with you suggestions for improvement." (Do not add to or modify this C statement.) If suggestions are given in writing, you must note the specific suggestions either on this form or on a separate T sheet of paper that must be attached to this form, and I B. Include in the notation efforts made to retrain your employee, and O C. Be sure to advise your employee that he/she may rebut your notation by attaching a separate sheet of paper describing the N S rebuttal, and D. Give the employee a copy of this form each time a notation describing substandard performance is made. 4. Ask your employee to initial next to your notes to confirm your discussion with him/her. 5. At the end of the rating period, review your notes to help you to determine the Final Rating for each Performance Category and/or the Overall rating. 6. Attach this form to the other appraisal forms at the end of the rating period only if there are performance notes. Indicate Notes were discussed with me. Performance Discussion Notes I was given the opportunity to Category # Date rebut substandard performance From Section #5 notes. Employee Initials & Date Use tab key to move to next block
6 Notes were discussed with me. I was given the opportunity to Performance Discussion Notes rebut substandard performance Category # Date notes. Employee Initials & Date
State of Hawai'i EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL HRD 526 (Rev. 9/05)
State of Hawai'i EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL HRD 526 (Rev. 9/05) Section #1 Name of Employee Position Title XXX-XX- Social Security No. Position No. Salary Range/Step Bargaining Unit Section #2 Department
Performance Appraisal System
SUPERVISORY MANUAL Performance Appraisal System For a New Century State Workforce State of Hawaii Department of Human Resources Development July 1, 2001 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM POLICY STATEMENT Public
VOLUNTARY SUPPLEMENTAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
VOLUNTARY SUPPLEMENTAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION The primary objectives of employee performance evaluations are: 1. An orderly effort designed to improve supervisor and staff communication; 2. To achieve
MILLSAPS COLLEGE ANNUAL EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION For Exempt and Nonexempt Staff
MILLSAPS COLLEGE ANNUAL EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION For Exempt and Nonexempt Staff EMPLOYEE NAME: JOB TITLE: DEPARTMENT: PERIOD OF EVALUATION: FROM: TO: TIME IN CURRENT POSITION: TIME WITH THE COLLEGE:
~~4 <l,.p. Human Resources Director
Approved: City of Riverside, California Human Resources Policy and Procedure Manual ~~4
RULES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CHAPTER 60L-35 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM
60L-35.001 Scope and Purpose 60L-35.002 Definitions 60L-35.003 Minimum Requirements 60L-35.004 Career Service 60L-35.005 Selected Exempt Service 60L-35.006 Transitional Provision (Repealed) 60L-35.001
Employee Performance Review. Reference Guide
Employee Performance Review Reference Guide Oklahoma Baptist University Office of Human Resources March 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS Why Review?... 1 The Ratings... 1 Managerial Elements... 1 Leadership...
WINTHROP UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM POLICY AND PROCEDURE
WINTHROP UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM POLICY AND PROCEDURE THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT A CONTRACT BETWEEN EMPLOYEES AND WINTHROP UNIVERSITY, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. THIS DOCUMENT DOES
SECTION I GENERAL JOB RESPONSIBILITIES
NIPISSING UNIVERSITY ADMINISTRATIVE EMPLOYEE EVALUATION The purpose of this employee evaluation is to assess performance/skill levels, improve communication and pin-point strengths and weaknesses identified
Staff Performance Evaluation
Staff Performance Evaluation This form, and any attachment, becomes part of the employee's official personnel file. Employee Name: Position Title: UIN: Department: Review Type: Annual Job At Risk Probationary
Oregon University System
Oregon University System COMPLETING A PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL For Employees in Classified Information Technology Positions Represented by the Oregon Public Employees Union Instructions for Supervisors INTRODUCTION
Utica College Performance Review Form
Utica College Performance Review Form EMPLOYEE NAME: DEPARTMENT: HIRE DATE: / / SUPERVISOR*: JOB TITLE: REVIEW PERIOD: From To *Supervisor is the person delivering the review INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING
Chapter 8: Performance Appraisal. Performance appraisal addresses the following objectives:
Chapter 8: Performance Appraisal Section 8-1: General Performance appraisal addresses the following objectives: Provides a basis for the determination of the level of performance, to involve the employee
EMPLOYEE INFORMATION
EMPLOYEE INFORMATION Date Last Name MI First Name Position/Title Current Pay Grade Department/Division or Section Original Hire Date Performance Review Period Date Appointed to Current Position From: Supervisor
Performance Evaluation Program. for Classified Staff Employees
Performance Evaluation Program for Classified Staff Employees Revised July 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS Prior to Meeting with Your Supervisor......3 Initial Supervisor/Employee Meeting to Establish Evaluation
EMPLOYEE APPRAISAL REPORT
An evaluation of performance and accomplishments for Year Ending December 2007 Employee Name: Employee ID #: Position Title Grade: Annual Appraisal Schedule TASK COMPLETION DATE SUPERVISOR S INITIALS EMPLOYEE
HUMAN RESOURCES. Revised: 04/30/03 Reviewed and Updated 11/11/10. To ensure a means by which employees and their supervisors can:
HUMAN RESOURCES Revised: 04/30/03 Reviewed and Updated 11/11/10 Policy Statement 3: Performance Management Performance Management Program 1. Purpose To establish a Policy for implementing and managing
DEPAUW UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROGRAM Hourly Employees
DEPAUW UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROGRAM Hourly Employees PART I PURPOSE DePauw University s performance appraisal process is based upon the belief that employees are our most critical resource,
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR NONFACULTY EMPLOYEES BANNER EMPLOYEE ID NUMBER:
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR NONFACULTY EMPLOYEES NAME: POSITION TITLE: DEPARTMENT/OFFICE: EVALUATED BY BANNER EMPLOYEE ID NUMBER: BANNER POSITION NUMBER: REVIEW DATE: Supervisor ID: INSTRUCTIONS:
2015 Performance Appraisal Template Samples
2015 Performance Appraisal Template Samples Human Resources Peer Networking Benchmarks 13 Examples of Performance Appraisals submitted by MAPP members Including Core Competencies and Helpful Phrases 2015
POLICY STATEMENT AND REGULATIONS
POLICY STATEMENT AND REGULATIONS Number 100.16 EXEMPT STAFF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL POLICY POLICY: All exempt District staff shall have their performance reviewed 1) twice during any probationary period
HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT. Guide to Evaluating Classified Employees
HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Guide to Evaluating Classified Employees HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Guide to Evaluating Classified Employees San Juan Unified School District 3738 Walnut Ave. Carmichael, CA
CITY OF GUNNISON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM 2013
CITY OF GUNNISON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM 2013 Name: Position: Anniversary Date in Position: Department: Supervisor: Appraisal Period: from to PURPOSE Communication about performance between
Employee Performance Review and Development (Non-Exempt)
Employee Performance Review and Development (Non-Exempt) Employee Name Employment Status: Regular Contingent II Period Covered Date of Review Job Title Division/Department Section/Unit Supervisor Rating
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM PART 1. Basic Information (To be completed by the supervisor) Name Title of Post Level At this post since Grade of post Since employed Appointment type Department Period
Evaluating Performance. A Guide to Non-Instructional Academic Staff, Limited, and Exempt Classified Employee Evaluation
Evaluating Performance A Guide to Non-Instructional Academic Staff, Limited, and Exempt Classified Employee Evaluation Training Agenda Why do Performance Evaluations? Employee and Supervisor Roles in Performance
Performance Evaluation Guide for Classified Staff Employees. Classified Staff Performance Evaluation Program
Performance Evaluation Guide for Classified Staff Employees Classified Staff Performance Evaluation Program June 2011 Performance Evaluation Guide for Classifed Staff Employees TABLE OF CONTENTS Preamble...
PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND APPRAISAL FORM NON-BARGAINING UNIT, NON-MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL
Employee Name: Position Title: Department: Supervisor Name: Date of Review: For Period: To At the beginning of each performance cycle, employee and supervisor review key responsibilities (from the job
ARTICLE 26 - PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
ARTICLE 26 - PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Page 1 The performance appraisal of employees in the AFGE bargaining unit shall he in accordance with this Article and VA Directive 5013 and VA handbook 5013. In the
The Bureau of Public Service System PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM
The Bureau of Public Service System PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM GENERAL INFORMATION In accordance with Public Service System Rules and Regulations Part 9.1 The performance evaluation system is designed
SOCIETY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL OF VANCOUVER ISLAND EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW
SOCIETY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL OF VANCOUVER ISLAND EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW NAME: PROGRAM: POSITION: REVIEW PERIOD: Introduction As part of the annual employee performance evaluation and review process,
POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES Human Resource Management Division PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM
POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES Human Resource Management Division PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM Pursuant to the provisions of Rule IX of the Omnibus Rules Implementing Book V of Executive Order
EMCP Performance Evaluation and Variable Pay Manual
EMCP Performance Evaluation and Variable Pay Manual Employee Classification and Compensation Division State of Hawaii Department of Human Resources Development 235 South Beretania Street Honolulu, Hawaii
ST. THOMAS UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM WITH SUPERVISORY DUTIES
ST. THOMAS UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM WITH SUPERVISORY DUTIES DATE: Name: Position: Department: Annual Performance Review COPY MUST BE RETURNED TO HR FOR FILE Part 1: of General Performance
College of Design. Merit Pay Rating System. Merit Rating System
College of Design Merit Pay Rating System Merit Rating System The College of Design will use the Performance Only model of merit pay. Merit rating system and definition a. Merit pay matrix if defined at
TOWN OF NEEDHAM PUBLIC WORKS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION POLICY #419
TOWN OF NEEDHAM PUBLIC WORKS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION POLICY #419 I. PURPOSE AND SCOPE The Purpose of this policy is to outline the Town's Public Works performance evaluation program, including the use of
GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CLASSIFIED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL RECORD FOR NON-SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEE NAME: EMPLOYEE IDENTIFICATION #:
GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CLASSIFIED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL RECORD FOR NON-SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEE NAME: EMPLOYEE IDENTIFICATION #: JOB TITLE: REVIEWED BY: UNIT: DATE OF REVIEW: REVIEW PERIOD:
Utica College Performance Review Form for LEADERSHIP
Utica College Performance Review Form for LEADERSHIP EMPLOYEE NAME: DEPARTMENT: HIRE DATE: / / SUPERVISOR*: JOB TITLE: REVIEW PERIOD: *Supervisor is the person delivering the review From To INSTRUCTIONS
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH, FOUNDATION EMPLOYEE PLANNING & PERFORMANCE REVIEW
TYPE OF APPRAISAL Employee Name First Annual Second Additional Supervisor/Manager Name Appraisal Review Period: Classification Month/Year Month/Year From to Department Date of Appraisal Complete the following
Performance Management System
Section 10, Page 1 Contents: Policy Policy Definitions The Process of Managing Performance Addressing Poor Performance Supporting Employee Development Transitions Access and Use of Performance Information
F. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM
F. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM GENERAL POLICY It is the policy of Scott County to regularly evaluate the work performance of its employees and provide them with relevant feedback to enable
BUTLER UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT GUIDE
BUTLER UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT GUIDE Performance management is the methodical and organized system for monitoring the results of work activities, collecting information and evaluating performance,
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (Part-Time non-benefited staff only)
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (Part-Time non-benefited staff only) Employee Name: Name: Position Title: Position Title: EKU ID No.: Review Period: / / through / / Department: Review Date: / / *This form
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 1, 2010 Page 1 of 12
1093.0 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION 1093.0.1 Authorization: Act 688 of 2009 amends Arkansas Code Annotated 21-5-1101 to provide a performance-based merit increase pay system based on employee performance evaluation.
Town of Sunapee Supervisory Performance Evaluation. Employee Last First Middle. Probationary progress Conclusion of probation
Town of Sunapee Supervisory Performance Evaluation Date of Evaluation Evaluation Period: From to Employee Department Last First Middle Job Title Anniversary (hire) date Date of appt. to current position
Administrative Instruction
Administrative Instruction Date: To: From: 26 July 2011 All UNOPS Personnel Pierre Moreau-Peron, Director, HRPG J 1-r AI Reference: Subject: AUHRPG/2011/04 Performance Management and Appraisal for staff
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM POLICY
FRANCIS MARION UNIVERSITY Human Resources Office SUBJECT: Employee Performance Management System Policy Originated: 12/13/93 Revised: 5/25/94 Revised: 7/24/96 Revised: 7/1/99 Revised: 4/18/01 EMPLOYEE
The Citadel Policies & Procedures Human Resources Department. Employee Performance Management System
1. PURPOSE Employee Performance Management System The purpose of the Employee Performance Management System (EPMS) is as follows: A. To provide an accurate and objective method to evaluate classified and
Manager / Supervisor Performance Review
Manager / Supervisor Performance Review SECTION 1 Personal Information (Please print clearly and provide complete & accurate information) Employee Name: Current Review Period: to Job Title: Department
Guide to Effective Staff Performance Evaluations
Guide to Effective Staff Performance Evaluations Compiled by Human Resources Siemens Hall, Room 211 The research is clear. The outcome is consistent. We know with certainty that the most powerful leadership
Bloomfield College Staff Employee Performance Review 2014-15
Bloomfield College Staff Employee Performance Review 2014-15 Employee Name: Position: Evaluator: Department: Date of Evaluation: Date of Hire: 1. Summary of departmental mission and customer service philosophy:
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL NON-ACADEMIC ADMINISTRATIVE - SUPERVISORY
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL NON-ACADEMIC ADMINISTRATIVE - SUPERVISORY Name: Job Title: Date of Evaluation: Department/School: AAMU Hire Date: Time in Current Position (years/months): Unit: Supervisor: Type of
MANAGING & EVALUATING EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE. A Guide to Classified Employee Performance Management & Evaluation
MANAGING & EVALUATING EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE A Guide to Classified Employee Performance Management & Evaluation OUTLINE Why do performance evaluations? Supervisor s role in performance management Employee
Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures
Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures ANNUAL FACULTY APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 2-0112 ACADEMIC AFFAIRS September 2015 POLICY 1.01 A review of faculty activities and accomplishments for
STATE BOARD FOR TECHNICAL AND COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION PROCEDURE
PAGE: 1 of 17 TITLE: EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (EPMS) (REVIEW DATE OPTION) POLICY REFERENCE NUMBER: 8-4-100 DIVISION OF RESPONSIBILITY: Human Resource Services DATE OF LAST REVISION: May 13,
Performance Appraisal System Evaluation Form Managers
Performance Appraisal System Evaluation Form Managers Name: Position Title: Department: Plan Date: Annual Review Date: PURPOSE OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Enable joint planning and communication between a
Professional & Scientific Performance Appraisal
Professional & Scientific Performance Appraisal Employee s Name: Employee s University ID #: Employee s Title: Department: Date Employee Began Current Position: Review Period: From: To: Supervisor s Name:
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM Name: Job Title: Date: Department: Type of Appraisal: Annual Probationary Self Evaluation Appraisal Period: From: To: Instructions: Please carefully review the employee
Performance Review Process Guidelines Nova Southeastern University
Performance Review Process Guidelines Nova Southeastern University for classified and administrative/professional employees Statement of Purpose and Philosophy The annual performance review is a key element
POLICE OFFICER (EMPLOYEE) EVALUATION
CHESWOLD POLICE Department of Public Safety POLICE OFFICER (EMPLOYEE) EVALUATION Effective Date: Directive Number: April 15, 2013 10-1-7 Special Instructions: NONE Distribution: All Sworn & Last Re-Evaluation
Performance Management
Performance Management PURPOSE... 1 POLICY STATEMENT... 2 WHO SHOULD KNOW THIS POLICY... 2 DEFINITIONS... 2 REGULATIONS... 3 1.0 TIMING AND FREQUENCY OF APPRAISALS... 3 2.0 PERFORMANCE PLANNING... 3 2.1
GUIDE TO EFFECTIVE STAFF PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS
GUIDE TO EFFECTIVE STAFF PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS The research is clear. The outcome is consistent. We know with certainty that the most powerful leadership tool for improving productivity and increasing
Guidance for Completing the Supervisory Employee Performance Appraisal Plan
Guidance for Completing the Supervisory Employee Performance Appraisal Plan Establishing Critical Elements and Performance Standards Critical elements (at least one, but not more than five) must be established
University of Maryland Nonexempt Staff PRD Form
PERFORMANCE REVIEW AND DEVELOPMENT PROCESS University of Maryland Nonexempt Staff PRD Form Employee Name: UID: Job Title: Division/Department: Supervisor: Rating Cycle: Date of Final Review: Section/Unit:
Performance Evaluation for Classified and Unclassified Non-Academic Staff
NUMBER: HR 1.36 SECTION: SUBJECT: Human Resources Performance Evaluation for Classified and Unclassified Non-Academic Staff DATE: July 1, 1995 REVISED: September 21, 2012 Policy for: Procedure for: Authorized
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL GUIDE
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL GUIDE University Human Resources, Rutgers University - 1 - Directions for Conducting Performance Appraisals Purpose An annual performance appraisal is required for all eligible administrative,
5.2 Performance Management Policy
Policy Statement The is committed to supporting the growth and development of employees through effective performance management. A key element of performance management is the translation of government
PERFORMANCE REVIEW NON- UNIT PROFESSIONAL
PERFORMANCE REVIEW NON- UNIT PROFESSIONAL Name: Title: Hire Date: Employee ID #: Department: Date Started in Position: Evaluation Period: Performance Review Attach the employee s current job description.
INTRODUCTION PART ONE: REVIEW OF PERFORMANCE ELEMENTS
INTRODUCTION This recommended performance appraisal form incorporates extensive feedback from University of California supervisors and managers. It captures the basic principles of effectively evaluating
Example: Box Elder District Classified Employee Evaluation and Improvement Report
Classified Employee Performance Evaluation and Improvement Report has developed this performance evaluation process as a way to encourage workers and their supervisors to talk about issues in the workplace.
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM (PACS)
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM (PACS) 1. DATE ISSUED CHAPTER S430_1 2. EMPLOYEES COVERED 3. LAW AND REGULATION 4. SSA DELEGATIONS OF AUTHORITY 5. SSA POLICY 5.1. Introduction 5.2. Overview
Sample Performance Appraisal
Sample Performance Appraisal Employee Name: Employee Job Title: Review Period Start: Review Period End: Hire Date: Location: Supervisor: Appraisal Date: General Information The purpose of the review is
CENTRAL STATE UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM
CENTRAL STATE UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM Name Date Department Evaluation Period Job Title Evaluator Annual Probationary Special (Explain) Performance I. SELF-ASSESSMENT In what areas do I excel
Alexander County Performance Evaluation Policy
Alexander County Performance Evaluation Policy Adopted: April 2, 2002 Revised August 4, 2003 I. INTRODUCTION The County of Alexander has recognized the relationship of position classification, job performance,
Duty Station: Appraisal Period: From: To: Employee: Rating Official: Reviewing Official (if applicable*): Employee: Date: Rating Official: Date:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Employee Performance Appraisal Plan Employee Name and Social Security Number: Title/Series/Grade: Duty Station: Appraisal Period: From: To: Part A-1: Notification of Standards:
Research Manager II. Task Statements
Research Manager II Task Statements 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Identify new and existing research (e.g., news, legislation, web searching, database) to advance understanding of the relevant areas
08.530 Employee Performance Management Program. Revised and Reformatted, February 20, 2006; supersedes former policy HR6.30
08.530 Employee Performance Management Program Authority: History: Source of Authority: Related Links: Director of Human Resources Revised and Reformatted, February 20, 2006; supersedes former policy HR6.30
Guide to Effective Staff Performance Evaluations
Guide to Effective Staff Performance Evaluations HRS Human Resource Services-Operations The research is clear. The outcome is consistent. We know with certainty that the most powerful leadership tool for
Performance Review (Non-Exempt Employees)
Performance Review (Non-Exempt Employees) Name: Department: Campus ID Number: Title: Review Period: - Job Description Review: I. Essential Job Requirements: (Consider employee s knowledge of duties, responsibilities
Civil Service Performance Management System
Civil Service Performance Management System A handbook for Supervisors on how to conduct performance planning, mid-term progress review and annual appraisal meetings. Table of Contents 1 Abbreviations...
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS
Truro Police Department EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS General Order Number: Effective : January 25, 2001 REFERENCE: Revised : April 7, 2005 Accreditation Standards: 35.1.1.- 35.1.5., 35.1.7-35.1.14
DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SUPERVISOR OR RATER S GUIDE
DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SUPERVISOR OR RATER S GUIDE DECEMBER 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Topic Page Number Supervisor or Rater s Guide (Scope & Purpose)... 4 Definitions... 4 Statutory/Rule
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL (Non-Exempt)
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL (Non-Exempt) ****************************************************** Name Department: Job Title Appraisal Period JOB KNOWLEDGE Consider overall knowledge, constructive and creative
University of California Regents Policy 7702 Senior Management Group Performance Management Review Process
Senior Management Group Performance Management Review Process Approved July 17, 2008 Amended September 16, 2010 and March 29, 2012 Responsible Officer: Vice President Human Resources Responsible Office:
Employee Performance Evaluation Form - Administrative Staff
Employee Performance Evaluation Form - Administrative Staff Employee Name: Job Title: Department: Unit: Reviewing Supervisor: Review Period: Period Supervised by Performance Reviewer: Period Employee in
Graduate Internship Materials Information Guide and Appendices Sport and Fitness Management Hospitality, Sport & Tourism Management
Graduate Internship Materials Information Guide and Appendices Sport and Fitness Management Hospitality, Sport & Tourism Management School of Hospitality, Sport & Tourism Management Dr. Fred Green Internship
SMITHSONIAN DIRECTIVE 212, Federal Personnel Handbook, Chapter 430 NON-SENIOR-LEVEL PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROGRAM
SMITHSONIAN DIRECTIVE 212, Federal Personnel Handbook, Chapter 430 September 30, 2010 NON-SENIOR-LEVEL PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROGRAM Purpose 1 Policy 1 Coverage 2 Exclusions 2 Definitions 3 Responsibilities
Tips for Filling out the Performance Planning and Appraisal Form (PPAF):
Tips for Filling out the Performance Planning and Appraisal Form (PPAF): The form used in the Performance Planning and Performance Appraisal processes is entitled the Performance Planning and Appraisal
DALLAS COUNTY NON-EXEMPT PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
DALLAS COUNTY Purpose: The following evaluation form is designed to measure the performance of non-exempt employees during the period of review, and provide an opportunity for the employee and supervisor
UC MERCED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Employee Name: Payroll Title: Bargaining Unit: Percent Appointment: Employee ID: Review Period: Department: Length of time in this position: Supervisor s Name: Supervised for entire review period? If not
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH Joint Employee Performance Appraisal Form
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH Joint Employee Performance Appraisal Form EMPLOYEE: CLASSIFICATION: EMPL ID: DEPARTMENT: RATER: TYPE OF EVALUATION: PROBATIONARY ANNUAL OTHER EVALUATION DATE: The Employee
This policy provides establishes procedures for evaluating employees performance and communicating performance expectations.
Revision Date: First Version Page: 1 of 10 I. SCOPE This policy applies to all salaried operational employees of the College of William and Mary, including the Virginia Institute of Marine Science (hereafter
DOUGLAS COUNTY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL MANUAL (Non-Supervisory Employees) TABLE OF CONTENTS
DOUGLAS COUNTY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL MANUAL (Non-Supervisory Employees) TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM DESCRIPTION PAGE(S) Section I Introduction 1-2 Section
