EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM



Similar documents
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH Joint Employee Performance Appraisal Form

Performance Review (Non-Exempt Employees)

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH, FOUNDATION EMPLOYEE PLANNING & PERFORMANCE REVIEW

University of Mississippi Medical Center Employee Performance Review Form. Employee Position Title: Employee Job Code: Employee Grade:

Date Started Current Position. Instructions

Bloomfield College Staff Employee Performance Review

Performance Appraisal Form

Sample Performance Appraisal

Employee Development Plan

MILLSAPS COLLEGE ANNUAL EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION For Exempt and Nonexempt Staff

Performance Appraisal Review for Exempt Employees

Manager / Supervisor Performance Review

CCAD Management Employee Performance Review

Employee Performance Review. Reference Guide

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

Performance Evaluation. August 20, 2013

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL (Non-Exempt)

ST. THOMAS UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM WITH SUPERVISORY DUTIES

JOB PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Monroe County Community College Administrators. Name: Position: Supervisor: Evaluation Period:

White Earth Tribal Council Annual Performance Appraisal

RULES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CHAPTER 60L-35 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM

Town of Sunapee Supervisory Performance Evaluation. Employee Last First Middle. Probationary progress Conclusion of probation

Employee Self-Evaluation Form

ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM FY

College of Design. Merit Pay Rating System. Merit Rating System

Cleveland State Community College. Classified Employee Performance Review

ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF EVALUATION FORM

Utica College Performance Review Form for LEADERSHIP

Utica College Performance Review Form

County of Mono. Performance Evaluation System. Job Performance Expectations and Standards

Professional & Scientific Performance Appraisal

FOOTHILL-DE ANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT

PENNSYLVANIA STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW

NOT APPLICABLE (N/A): Reviewer has no direct knowledge of employee's behavior in this area. Job Knowledge Score: / 5.0

Staff Performance Evaluation

Performance Management. Writing Performance Assessments and Goals 2014

POLICY STATEMENT AND REGULATIONS

IACBE Advancing Academic Quality in Business Education Worldwide

Number of employees who report to level of evaluated:

Writing and Conducting Successful Performance Appraisals. Guidelines for Managers and Supervisors

User s Guide to Performance Management

SOCIETY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL OF VANCOUVER ISLAND EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW

Performance Evaluation

Libraries and Educational Technologies Professional & Performance Development Form Library Faculty Self Evaluation

County of Orange Department of Fire & EMS Employee Performance Evaluation Company Officer. Hire Date: Period Covered:

Employee Performance Appraisal Form

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW GUIDELINES

EMPLOYEE REVIEW SYSTEM

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (Part-Time non-benefited staff only)

2. Describe this employee s important accomplishments during the past year. Please provide examples.

Teacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Plan. Maine Township High School District 207. Our mission is to improve student learning.

University of Maryland Nonexempt Staff PRD Form

CITY OF GUNNISON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM 2013

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL NON-ACADEMIC ADMINISTRATIVE - SUPERVISORY

Administrative Support Professionals Competency Framework. The Centre for Learning and Development

CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ROCKFORD EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

SECTION I GENERAL JOB RESPONSIBILITIES

Association of Municipal Administrators The Voice of Municipal Administrators

GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CLASSIFIED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL RECORD FOR NON-SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEE NAME: EMPLOYEE IDENTIFICATION #:

Employee Performance Review and Development (Non-Exempt)

Part One: Review of Performance Elements Rating Scale

Staff Development and Performance Management Policy & Procedure

Ratings Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Improvement Needed

Employee Support and Development Performance Management Planning. Government Departments and Agencies

Employee Evaluation. 5= Outstanding: Performance is extraordinary and exceptional. (Outstanding ratings should only be awarded on rare occasions.

Instruction Manual. May, 2015 Performance Appraisal Process Local 2324 Represented Employees

PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND APPRAISAL FORM NON-BARGAINING UNIT, NON-MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL

UCC CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

DOUGLAS COUNTY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL MANUAL (Non-Supervisory Employees) TABLE OF CONTENTS

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Fayetteville Technical Community College PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL MANUAL

CENTRAL STATE UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM

Performance Management and Evaluation for Administrators and Technical Professionals

BUSINESS SYSTEMS MANAGER

STATE BOARD FOR TECHNICAL AND COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

The Bureau of Public Service System PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW

MESA PUBLIC SCHOOLS CLASSIFIED EVALUATION SYSTEM

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

DEPAUW UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROGRAM Hourly Employees

2015 Performance Appraisal Template Samples

GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CLASSIFIED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL RECORD FOR SUPERVISORY/MANAGERIAL EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEE NAME: EMPLOYEE IDENTIFICATION #:

STAFF PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE

San Jose/Evergreen Community College District Administrator Performance Appraisal Forms

Setting the Expectation for Success: Performance Management & Appraisal System

Performance Management Handbook. City of American Canyon

The University of Southern Mississippi Performance Appraisal Instructions

Faculty Performance Appraisal System Akamai University

Boston University Performance Evaluation Program. Administrative Employees Exempt and Non-Exempt

Employee Performance Evaluation Form - Administrative Staff

Exempt Performance Reviews. Date Approved: June 23, 2008 Last Edited: June 3, 2014

Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport Authority. Performance Evaluation System Guide

Transcription:

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM Name: Job Title: Date: Department: Type of Appraisal: Annual Probationary Self Evaluation Appraisal Period: From: To: Instructions: Please carefully review the employee s performance during the past appraisal period and select the description that best describes the employee s overall performance. Please provide supporting comments and examples for each performance area. This appraisal focuses on factors, which determine the quality of the overall performance, and indicates areas, which may require further training and professional development. JOB KNOWLEDGE: The employee s understanding of his/her specific job responsibilities and general goals of the agency Exceeds Expectations: Demonstrates deep knowledge of the professional field and understands the most complex aspects of the job responsibilities. Above Expectations: Demonstrates solid working knowledge of the professional area and is capable of handing complex projects. Meets Expectations: Demonstrates sufficient knowledge of the professional area and performs job responsibilities well. Improvement Needed: Lacks knowledge in several basic elements of the job. Requires frequent instruction in areas of fundamental knowledge. Unsatisfactory: Performance is consistently below the expected level. Despite a reasonable period of orientation, and/or instruction, job knowledge remains at an unacceptably low level. QUALITY OF WORK: The accuracy and thoroughness with which the employee performs tasks Exceeds Expectations: Consistently produces work that is of the highest quality and accuracy. Above Expectations: Almost always produces high quality, accurate work. Meets Expectations: Typically produces quality work with occasional errors. Improvement Needed: Attention needed to producing work that is more thorough and accurate. Unsatisfactory: Performance is consistently below the expected level. Disorganized and usually unprepared. COMMUNICATION: Effectively conveys and receives ideas, information and directions; listens effectively; demonstrates good verbal and written communication. Shares appropriate information with coworkers and management. Exceeds Expectations: Excellent oral and written communication skills. An active listener who has a sound sense of when to share important information and with who to share it with. Above Expectations: Demonstrates above average oral and written communication skills. Meets Expectations: Demonstrates solid communication skills but may need occasional training to sharpen certain areas. Improvement Needed: Additional training to develop communication skills is recommended. Frequent communication break downs can cause confusion with coworkers and interfere with the employee s ability to complete assignments accurately. Unsatisfactory: Performance is consistently below the expected level. Communication skills are extremely poor.

PRODUCTIVITY / RELIABILITY: Maintains fair workload; takes on additional responsibilities as needed; manages priorities; develops and follow work procedures; completes assignments on time and with accuracy. Exceeds Expectations: Reliability never in question. Work assignments always completed with the highest level of accuracy and ahead of deadline. Above Expectations: Very reliable. Work always performed accurately and on time. Meets Expectations: Reliable employee. Work assignments typically completed accurately and in a timely fashion. Improvement Needed: Work deadlines frequently missed and assignments tend to have a high level of inaccuracies. Unsatisfactory: Performance is consistently below the expected level. Resists assignments and requires constant direction. DEPENDABILITY / INITIATIVE: Demonstrates independent action and resourcefulness on the job; Performs duties in an acceptable manner with minimal supervision. Exceeds Expectations: Constantly exhibits independent action and resourcefulness. Exercises outstanding judgment on knowing when to seek guidance from supervisor. A highly motivated employee. Above Expectations: Frequently exhibits independent action and resourcefulness. Exercises good judgment on knowing when to seek guidance from supervisor. Meets Expectations: Dependable employee. Generally demonstrates independent action with minimal supervision. Improvement Needed: More independent action is needed. Requires more than normal supervisory guidance in normal, jobrelated decisions. Unsatisfactory: Performance is consistently below the expected level. Requires constant supervision at all times. ATTENDANCE: Consistently is on time and ready to work at the start of shift and after breaks; requires no start up time; always provides proper notification or advance notice for absence or tardiness. Exceeds Expectations: Consistently is on time and always provides proper notification or advance notice for absence or tardiness. Never requires any start up time. Above Expectations: Occasionally early and usually prepared to work at prescribed time. Rarely absent. Meets Expectations: Attendance record satisfactory. Generally on time. Works well without prodding. Improvement Needed: Employee attendance record is unstable. Unsatisfactory: Performance is consistently below the expected level. Seldom on time. Absent often. RELATIONS WITH OTHERS: Consider employee s abilities to maintain a positive and harmonious attitude in the work environment. Exceeds Expectations: Successfully works with others to achieve desired results. Always able to prevent, resolve conflicts. Is very open minded and flexible. Very respectable towards co workers. Above Expectations: Always maintain a positive attitude in the work environment. Always willing to help. Meets Expectations: Employee typically contributes to team projects and has a positive working relationship with co workers. Improvement Needed: Often disagreeable in cooperating with co workers and fails to get along with others. Unsatisfactory: Performance is consistently below the expected level. Uncooperative.

PROFESSIONALISM: Displays the behavior, demeanor and appearance generally associated with the assigned position. Exceeds Expectations: Consistently demonstrates a superior level of professional behavior, attitude and appearance. Has achieved certification(s) available for position. Maintains superior personal standards and strict confidentiality. Exercises self control. Above Expectations: Consistently demonstrates a above average level of professional behavior, demeanor and appearance. Actively pursues continuing education and learning opportunities. Maintains confidentiality. Meets Expectations: Consistently demonstrates good professional behavior, demeanor and appearance. Participates effectively in job skills training opportunities as offered by the agency. Maintains confidentiality. Improvement Needed: Needs to make a more serious effort to demonstrate professional behavior appropriate to the position. Unsatisfactory: Performance is consistently below the expected level.

Supervisory Ability (applicable only to designated supervisor positions) DECISION MAKING ABILITY: Demonstrates sound, timely decision making practices. Exceeds Expectations: Exhibits confident, outstanding decision making skills that take all important factors into consideration. Above Expectations: Very good decision maker who makes the necessary decisions in a timely fashion. Resourceful. Meets Expectations: Good decision maker. Tends to be logical in approach to problems. Reasonably alert to opportunities. Improvement Needed: Has difficulty in obtaining or evaluating pertinent information and/or puts off making decisions considering facts at hand. Unsatisfactory: Performance is consistently below the expected level. Often misunderstand or bungle directions. Untimely and inconsistent decision making practices are frequently exhibited. LEADERSHIP: Motivates team with sound direction and leadership. Exceeds Expectations: Acts as a positive mentor and coach to all direct reports and is concerned with departmental success as well as individual growth. Ties departmental goals to strategic mission. Above Expectations: A very sound leader who promotes departmental initiative and strategic mission. Work with direct reports on a regular basis to ensure a productive work environment. Meets Expectations: Provides necessary leadership to individuals and the department. Supports the progress of staff members and the mission of the Agency. Improvement Needed: A stronger sense of responsibility for the direction of the department and a more focused attempt to contribute to or support the mission of the Agency would be beneficial. Unsatisfactory: Performance is consistently below the expected level. Lacks adequate sensitivity to the needs of staff. COORDINATION: Demonstrated ability to coordinate work program elements with appropriate staff members, outside agencies and other partners. Exceeds Expectations: Always maintains a cooperative working relationship with the appropriate staff members, outside agencies and other partners. Always promotes a positive image of the agency. Above Expectations: Frequently coordinates well with other agencies and coworkers. Meets Expectations: Coordinates with other agencies and coworkers in an acceptable manner. Improvement Needed: Has a difficult time coordinating effectively with other agencies and appropriate staff members. Unsatisfactory: Performance is consistently below the expected level. Tends to create problems with others. MANAGEMENT TEAM PARTICIPATION: Level of participation as a management team member, including contribution to group budgeting, work programming, problem solving, and policy development efforts. Exceeds Expectations: A very active team member who collaborates well with others. An excellent communicator who generates creative ideas and solutions for cost reduction and/or revenue enhancements. High energy in meetings. Above Expectations: Always participates in team management meetings. Always provide good feedback to the team. Meets Expectations: Works well with management team. Will usually support efforts. Improvement Needed: Does not respond well to teamwork. Needs to share information with group. Unsatisfactory: Performance is consistently below the expected level. Shows no desire to participate.

OBJECTIVES FOR UPCOMING YEAR I. Performance Plan: Identify specific actions/behaviors the employee needs to initiate, cease and/or continue in the upcoming performance period. Attach any additional pages, if necessary. II. III. Development Plans: Identify specific work assignments and topics for training designed to increase individual s effectiveness on present job and prepare for future job assignments. Attach any additional pages, if necessary. Goals for Year: Identify specific performance goals for year. Attach any additional pages, if necessary. Overall Employee Rating: Exceeds Expectations Above Expectations Meets Expectations Improvement Needed Unsatisfactory Overall comments including any necessary corrective action: Date discussed with Employee: Evaluator s Signature Employee Comments: Enter below any comments you wish to make about your appraisal or the objectives for the upcoming year. Attach additional page if needed. I have reviewed the above evaluation and discussed it with my supervisor. My signature below shall not be construed to mean either agreement or disagreement with the evaluation but rather acknowledgement that the evaluation has been seen by me. Employee s Signature Date Executive Director s Signature Date