The German health system: basics and some comparisons with other countries



Similar documents

Experience of western European Social Health Insurance countries: reflections for Slovakia

Multinational Comparisons of Health Systems Data, 2013

THE HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS OF GERMANY AND SWITZERLAND. Merely slouching towards Regulated Competition


On the Front Line: Primary Care Doctors Experiences in Eleven Countries

SWECARE FOUNDATION. Uniting the Swedish health care sector for increased international competitiveness

Multinational Comparisons of Health Systems Data, 2014

Health Care Systems: An International Comparison. Strategic Policy and Research Intergovernmental Affairs May 2001

How To Get Health Care In The United States

Cross-country comparison of health care system efficiency

Private Health insurance in the OECD

Private Health insurance in the OECD

VULNERABILITY OF SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS

Expenditure on Health Care in the UK: A Review of the Issues

Average Health Care Spending per Capita, Adjusted for Differences in Cost of Living

DESCRIPTIONS OF HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS: GERMANY AND THE NETHERLANDS

Mapping quality assurance approaches in Europe

THE ORGANISATION AND FINANCING OF HEALTH CARE SYSTEM IN LATVIA

Private Health Insurance in OECD Countries

Healthcare and Population Aging

Germany's Statutory Health Insurance:

Delegation in human resource management

Appendix. Appendix Figure 1: Trends in age-standardized cardiometabolic (CVD and diabetes) mortality by country.

Health financing policy: performance and response to economic crisis

PUBLIC VS. PRIVATE HEALTH CARE IN CANADA. Norma Kozhaya, Ph.D Economist, Montreal economic Institute CPBI, Winnipeg June 15, 2007

Hong Kong s Health Spending 1989 to 2033

VOLUNTARY HEALTH INSURANCE AS A METHOD OF HEALTH CARE FINANCING IN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES

Government at a Glance 2015

HiT summary. Spain. Health Systems in Transition. Introduction. Observatory. Government and recent political history. Population

Health Care in Crisis

HEALTH CARE DELIVERY IN BRITAIN AND GERMANY: TOWARDS CONVERGENCE?

4/17/2015. Health Insurance. The Framework. The importance of health care. the role of government, and reasons for the costs increase

Swe den Structure, delive ry, administration He althcare Financing Me chanisms and Health Expenditures Quality of Bene fits, C hoice, Access

Expenditure and Outputs in the Irish Health System: A Cross Country Comparison

APPENDIX C HONG KONG S CURRENT HEALTHCARE FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS. Public and Private Healthcare Expenditures

Transfer issues and directions for reform: Australian transfer policy in comparative perspective

Private health insurance: second-best or second-worst solution? Sarah Thomson EHMA VHI MASTERCLASS Milan, 27 June 2013

Social insurance, private insurance and social protection. The example of health care systems in some OECD countries

The German health insurance model

Medizinische Soziologie. Das Gesundheitssystem II: USA und UK

GBMC HealthCare is Building a Better System of Care for Our Community. John B. Chessare MD, MPH President and CEO GBMC HealthCare System

Health Systems: Type, Coverage and Financing Mechanisms

Instruments to control and finance the building of healthcare infrastructure in other countries of the European Union

Lucerne, Switzerland 13th-15th July 2007 OVERALL STANDING

OECD Health Data 2012 U.S. health care system from an international perspective

Pharmaceutical Policy in Korea: Role of Health Insurance in Pricing, Reimbursement and Monitoring

POLAND Modern and Strong Economy

The Private Health Insurance Market in Europe

Public / private mix in health care financing

PUBLIC & PRIVATE HEALTH CARE IN CANADA

Health at a Glance: Europe 2014

Healthcare systems an international review: an overview

Measuring Health System Performance Lecture 11 Benchmarking and public reporting of provider performance

Medizinische Soziologie. Das Gesundheitssystem I: USA und UK

TOWARDS PUBLIC PROCUREMENT KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS. Paulo Magina Public Sector Integrity Division

Social health insurance in Belgium. Charlotte Wilgos & Thomas Rousseau

Voluntary health insurance and health care reforms

THE ANALYSIS OF PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE PENETRATION DEGREE AND DENSITY IN EUROPE

HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS IN THE EU A COMPARATIVE STUDY

OECD HEALTH WORKING PAPERS

Public and private health insurance: where to mark to boundaries? June 16, 2009 Kranjska Gora, Slovenia Valérie Paris - OECD

B Financial and Human Resources

A Journey to Improve Canada s Healthcare System

Waiting times and other barriers to health care access

Health Care a Public or Private Good?

Single Payer Systems: Equity in Access to Care

The U.S Health Care Paradox: How Spending More is Getting Us Less

The State of Oral Health in Europe. Professor Kenneth Eaton Chair of the Platform for Better Oral Health in Europe

Bismarck, Beveridge and The Blues

ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT

THE CHALLENGES OF FUNDING HEALTHCARE FOR AN AGEING POPULATION A COMPARISON OF ACTUARIAL METHODS AND BENEFIT DESIGNS

CHALLENGES FOR ROMANIAN HEALTH SECTOR IN BECOMING A SUSTAINABLE SYSTEM. Ana-Mădălina POTCOVARU 1

Finland must take a leap towards new innovations

ANTICIPATING POPULATION AGEING CHALLENGES AND RESPONSES. Peter Whiteford Social Policy Division, OECD

Table of Contents. Page Background 3. Executive Summary 4. Introduction 11. Health Care Funding Models 12. Health Care Costs 15

INTERNATIONAL PRICE COMPARISON: THE CYPRIOT EXAMPLE. Athos Tsinontides Health Insurance Organisation

German Medical Association

Health Care Systems: Efficiency and Policy Settings

Definition of Public Interest Entities (PIEs) in Europe

Preventing fraud and corruption in public procurement

July Figure 1. 1 The index is set to 100 in House prices are deflated by country CPIs in most cases.

Convegno Annuale AISIS

The Commonwealth Fund International Health Policy Surveys

Transcription:

The German health system: basics and some comparisons with other countries Prof. Dr. med. Reinhard Busse, MPH Department ofhealthcare Management/ WHO Collaborating Centre for Health Systems, Research and Management, Berlin University oftechnology & European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies

How we look at health systems Collector of resources Third-party payers Regulator Population Providers

The German system at a glance Uniform wage-related contribution + possibly additional premium (set by sickness fund), Choice of fund/ insurer Risk-structure compensation Collector of resources Health fund Risk-related premium Strong delegation (Federal Joint Committee) & limited governmental control Third-party payers Ca. 130 sickness funds Ca. 45 private insurers Contracts, mostly collective No contracts Population Universal coverage: Statutory Health Insurance 86%, Private HI 11% Choice Providers Public-private mix, organised in associations ambulatory care/ hospitals

German health system overview Key characteristics (I): a) Sharing of decision-making powers between the sixteen Länder (states), the federal government and statutory civil society organizations i.e. important competencies are legally delegated to membership-based, self-regulated organisations of payers and providers b) German health care [almost] = Statutory health insurance (SHI) SHI Cornerstone of health service provision is the Fifth Book of the German Social Law (SGB V) i.e. it organizes and defines the self-regulated corporatist structures and give them the duty and power to develop benefits, prices and standards c) Existence of substitutive private health insurance alongside SHI

German health system overview Key characteristics (I): a) Sharing of decision-making powers between the sixteen Länder (states), the federal government and statutory civil society organizations i.e. important competencies are legally delegated to membership-based, self-regulated organisations of payers and providers b) German health care [almost] = Statutory health insurance (SHI) SHI Cornerstone of health service provision is the Fifth Book of the German Social Law (SGB V) i.e. it organizes and defines the self-regulated corporatist structures and give them the duty and power to develop benefits, prices and standards c) Existence of substitutive private health insurance alongside SHI

SHI Private health insurance

Third-party Payers Taxes 9% 77% public Social Health Insurance contributions 68% Voluntary insurance 9% Population Germany 2011 Out-of-pocket 12% Providers 11.3% of GDP

Financial flows in SHI (2011) allocations Source: Göppfarth & Henke, Health Policy 2013

German health system overview Key characteristics: d) Sectoral borders Provision of ambulatory and inpatient services. Planning, resource allocation, provision and financing are separate for ambulatory (office-based physicians) and inpatient (hospitals) sector. Complicates the provision of health care delivery (problematic especially for chronically ill answers: Disease Management Programmes and selective integrated care contracts) Increases the amount of specialists Increases the health care expenditure Various reforms have tried to lessen sectoral borders (last in 2012 by creating a new in-between sector for highly specialized ambulatory care)

Decision-making in German SHI Legislation Parliament Federal Ministry of Health Supervision Patient 150,000 ambulatory care physicians and psychotherapists Federal Association of SHI Physicians (KBV) 130 sickness funds German Hospital Federation (DKG) 2,000 hospitals Federal Association of Sickness Funds Federal Joint Commitee (G-BA) Members: 13 voting 3 neutral + 5 sickness funds + 5 providers (+ up to 5 patient representatives) Statutory Health Insurance

Objectives of Federal Joint Committee Main functions: to regulate SHI-wide issues of access, benefits and quality(and not primarily of costs or expenditure) Normative function of the G-BA by legally binding directives ( sub-law ) toguarantee equal excess to necessary and appropriate services for all SHI insured Benefit package decisions must be justified by an evidencebased process to determine whether services, pharmaceuticals or technologies are medically effective in terms of morbidity, mortality and quality of life By law, evidence based assessments can only be used to select the most appropriate (efficient) service etc. from others not to prioritize among service areas: if a costly innovation has a significant additional benefit, the sickness funds must pay for it

The hospital sector: (too) many beds, Acute care hospital beds per 100000 700 50% 600 500 400 60% Austria Belgium Denmark France Germany Italy Netherlands Norway Spain Sweden Switzerland United Kingdom EU members before May 2004 300 200 1993 2003 2013

The hospital sector: (too) many cases 28 Acute care hospital discharges per 100 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 +15% -2% -32% Austria Belgium Denmark France Germany Italy Netherlands Norway Spain Sweden Switzerland EU members before May 2004 10 8 1993 2003 2013

Average annual growth of total health expenditure before crisis: 2000-2009 (OECD 2013) +3.4% +3.9% +3.3% +7.0% +5.3% +5.5% +3.7% +2.1% +2.1% +2.2% +1.8% +4.1% +1.6% +5.3%

Rating of overall quality of healthcare in country (autumn 2009): good (Eurobarometer 327) 90% 94% 87% 53% 86% 91% 97% 88% 91% 86% 95% 42% 81% 54% 25%

Health policy rating 2008 (Mackenbach& McKee 2013) 63 89 43 38 37 52 17 56 25 35 48 19 35 31 16

An example quality indicator: prescription of antibiotics (in DDD/ capita), 2010 14.2 18.5 16.5 20.3 18.7 28.2 28.4 11.2 28.6 14.5 15.0 22.4 20.3 27.3 39.4

Average annual growth of total health expenditure in crisis: 2009-2011 (OECD 2013) +1.8% +1.6% -6.6% -1.8% +1.0% -1.8% +0.6% +0.7% +2.1% +0.2% -2.2% -0.5% -0.4% -11.1%

Average annual growth of total health expenditure: 2009-2011 vs. 2000-2009 (OECD 2013) +7.0% -6.6% +2.1% +2.1% -11.1% +5.3%

Performance assessment Avoidable mortality Deaths per 100,000 population* 150 100 88 89 88 81 76 1997 98 2006 07 116 109 106 99 97 97 134 115 113 127 120 50 55 57 60 61 61 64 66 67 74 76 77 78 79 80 83 96 0 FR AUS ITA JPN SWE NOR NETH AUT FIN GER GRE IRL NZ DEN UK US

www.mig.tu-berlin.de