2015 Major Field Test Comparative Data Guide Major Field Test for Associate Business The annual Comparative Data Guide (CDG) contains tables of scaled scores and percentiles for individual student scores and institutional means drawn directly from test takers across the nation. The report provides descriptive statistics based on the number of students that have completed the Major Field Test (MFT) for Associate Business since it was released in November 2007 and June 2015. Information about an institution gathered through MFT administrations cannot be released in any form attributable to or identifiable with an individual institution. The anonymity of each institution s performance is maintained by reporting only the aggregate performance of the selected reference group. are descriptions of the various tables provided in this guide: Individual Students Total Score/Subscore Distributions The distributions in these tables may be used to interpret individual student results by determining what percent of those taking the test at the selected institutions attained scores below that of a particular student. Each table shows scaled score intervals for Total Score and Subscores separately. By looking up the Total Score or Subscore and reading across the row to the corresponding number in the column headed, the percent of individuals scoring below any interval can be determined. Institutional Means Total Score/Subscore Distributions The distributions in these tables present the number of institutions at each mean score level. These tables provide a way to compare the Total Score and Subscore means for your institution with those of other participating institutions you selected. These tables show the mean of means (or the average of the mean scores for those institutions/programs selected) as well as the standard deviations of those means. Institutional Assessment Indicator Mean Score Distributions The assessment indicator summary information in these tables includes the frequency distribution of departmental/program means for each assessment indicator. These tables show the distribution of institutional rounded means as well as the average and standard deviations of those means. Note that not all MFT titles in all subject areas generate subscores or assessment indicators. Please refer to the test content description for your subject area of interest at www.ets.org/mft/about/content to determine which score types you should expect to generate for your MFT test subject. The following considerations should be kept in mind when interpreting comparative data: This data should be considered comparative rather than normative because the institutions included in the data do not represent proportionally the various types of higher education institutions and programs. The data are drawn entirely from institutions that choose to use MFT. Such a self-selected sample may not be representative of all institutions or programs. The number of students tested and sampling procedures vary from one institution to another. Therefore, it is impossible to verify that the students tested at each institution are representative of all the institution s students in that program. It is important that these comparisons involve students at approximately the same point in their educational careers. The tables report data for test takers with 31 to 90 credit hours completed only. Students who have not in that range are excluded from these calculations. The tables report data for institutions/programs that have tested five (5) or more test takers. Institutions/programs with fewer than five (5) test takers are excluded from these calculations. No single institution accounts for more than 12% percent of all the students included. For more information about this report or other ways the Major Field Tests can help your program, contact an ETS Advisor at highered@ets.org or call 1-800-745-0269. The following tables include tests taken as of June 30, 2015.
Institution List Albertus Magnus College, CT Alpena Community College, MI American Intercontinental University, IL Atlantic Cape Community College, NJ Baker College - Clinton Township, MI Baker College - Flint, MI Baker University - Overland Park, KS BridgeValley Community and Technical College, WV Burlington County College, NJ Chattanooga State Community College, TN Clark State Community College, OH Columbia State Community College, TN Cossatot CC of the U. of Arkansas, AR Dakota State University, SD Davenport University, MI Davidson County Community College, NC Delaware Tech & Community College - Dover, DE Delaware Tech & Community College - Georgetown, DE Delaware Tech & Community College - Newark, DE Emmanuel College (GA), GA Florida SouthWestern State College, FL Fullbridge Program, The, MA Harrisburg Area Community College, PA Hodges University - Fort Meyers, FL Hudson Valley Community College, NY ivy Tech Community College - Bloomington, IN Ivy Tech Community College - Columbus, IN Ivy Tech Community College - Evansville, IN Ivy Tech Community College - Fort Wayne, IN Ivy Tech Community College - Gary, IN Ivy Tech Community College - Kokomo, IN Ivy Tech Community College - Lafayette, IN Ivy Tech Community College - Lawrence, IN Ivy Tech Community College - Lawrenceburg, IN Ivy Tech Community College - Madison, IN Ivy Tech Community College - Muncie, IN Ivy Tech Community College - Richmond, IN Ivy Tech Community College - Sellersburg, IN Ivy Tech Community College - South Bend, IN Ivy Tech Community College - Terre Haute, IN Landmark College, VT Metropolitan Community College, NE North Arkansas College, AR North Central State College, OH Northwest State Community College, OH Northwestern Michigan College, MI Ocean County College, NJ Peirce College, PA Pierpont Community & Technical College, WV Polk State College, FL Rappahannock Community College, VA Rasmussen College - Burr Ridge, IL Rasmussen College - Eden Prairie, MN Rhodes State College, OH Rogers State University, OK Saint Leo University, FL St. Charles Community College, MO Sussex County Community College, NJ Technical College of the Lowcountry, SC Troy University - Troy, AL University of Puerto Rico - Carolina, PR Welch College, TN West Virginia University - Parkersburg, WV MFT 2015 Comparative Data Guide Page 2
Individual Students Total Score Distribution Number of Examinees Mean Median Standard Deviation 6,230 546.7 546.0 12.6 Individual Students Total Score Distribution Total Score Range (520-600) 580-600 99 579 98 578 98 577 98 576 98 575 97 574 97 573 97 572 96 571 96 570 95 569 94 568 93 567 92 566 91 565 91 564 90 563 88 562 87 561 85 560 83 559 83 558 81 557 78 556 75 555 72 554 72 553 69 552 66 551 63 550 59 549 55 548 55 547 52 546 48 545 45 544 41 543 41 542 37 541 33 540 30 539 26 538 23 537 23 536 20 535 16 534 14 MFT 2015 Comparative Data Guide Page 3
Total Score Range (520-600) 533 11 532 9 531 9 530 7 529 6 528 5 527 3 526 3 525 2 524 2 520-523 1 Total Scores are reported as scaled scores. based on percent below the lower limit of the score interval. MFT 2015 Comparative Data Guide Page 4
Institutional Means Total Score Distribution Number of Institutions Mean Median Standard Deviation 63 547.0 548.0 6.1 Institutional Means Total Score Distribution Mean Total Score Range (520-600) 561-600 99 560 98 559 98 558 96 557 96 556 96 555 92 554 90 553 87 552 80 551 74 550 68 549 60 548 46 547 41 546 33 545 26 544 17 543 15 542 11 541 7 540 6 539 6 538 4 537 3 536 3 535 3 534 3 533 3 532 3 531 3 530 3 529 3 528 3 527 3 520-526 1 Total Scores are reported as scaled scores. based on percent below the lower limit of the score interval. MFT 2015 Comparative Data Guide Page 5
Institutional Assessment Indicator Mean Score Distributions Assessment Indicator Number of Institutions Mean Median Standard Deviation 1: Accounting 2: Economics 3: Management 4: Marketing 63 41.3 42.0 5.9 63 52.8 53.0 5.7 63 50.9 51.0 6.2 63 51.0 51.0 6.7 Institutional Assessment Indicator Mean Score Distributions Mean Correct (0-100%) A1 1 A2 1 A3 1 A4 1 69-100 99 99 99 99 68 99 98 99 99 67 99 98 98 99 66 99 98 98 98 65 99 98 98 96 64 99 95 98 96 63 99 95 98 96 62 99 95 98 96 61 99 95 98 96 60 99 93 95 95 59 99 90 93 92 58 99 87 93 90 57 99 79 92 87 56 98 73 84 85 55 98 63 73 76 54 98 57 65 63 53 96 42 55 55 52 95 33 52 50 51 95 31 42 44 50 95 22 39 28 49 92 14 28 26 48 92 6 19 17 47 84 6 11 14 46 80 4 11 12 45 73 3 7 11 44 66 3 4 6 43 58 3 4 4 42 49 3 4 4 41 36 3 4 4 40 30 3 3 4 39 23 3 3 4 38 20 3 3 3 MFT 2015 Comparative Data Guide Page 6
Mean Correct (0-100%) A1 1 A2 1 A3 1 A4 1 37 15 3 3 3 36 11 3 3 3 35 7 1 3 3 34 4 1 3 3 33 4 1 3 3 32 4 1 3 3 31 4 1 3 3 30 4 1 3 3 29 4 1 3 3 28 3 1 1 3 27 3 1 1 1 0-26 1 1 1 1 1 Assessment Indicator 1: Accounting Assessment Indicator 2: Economics Assessment Indicator 3: Management Assessment Indicator 4: Marketing Assessment Indicators are reported as percent correct. based on percent below the lower limit of the score interval. MFT 2015 Comparative Data Guide Page 7