List of Institutions Number of School Name

Transcription

1 Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2007 through June 2012 List of Institutions Number of School Name Students ABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY, TX 1,176 ALABAMA A&M UNIVERSITY, AL 49 ALABAMA STATE UNIVERSITY, AL 266 ALCORN STATE UNIVERSITY, MS 64 AMERICAN PUBLIC UNIVERSITY, WV 358 ANGELO STATE UNIVERSITY, TX 642 ARMSTRONG ATLANTIC STATE UNIVERSITY, GA 647 AUBURN UNIVERSITY - MONTGOMERY, AL 47 AUSTIN PEAY STATE UNIVERSITY, TN 46 BELLARMINE UNIVERSITY, KY 67 BEMIDJI STATE UNIVERSITY, MN 30 BETHEL COLLEGE - TN, TN 117 BLOOMSBURG UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, PA 78 BRENAU UNIVERSITY, GA 89 CAMPBELL UNIVERSITY, NC 113 CHRISTIAN BROTHERS UNIVERSITY, TN 181 CLARION UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, PA 54 COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON, SC 44 COLLEGE OF NEW JERSEY, THE, NJ 33 COLUMBIA COLLEGE - MO, MO 65 CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY - CHICAGO, IL 202 CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY - IRVINE, CA 46 CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY - WISCONSIN, WI 257 DYERSBURG STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, TN 328 EAST STROUDSBURG UNIVERSITY, PA 52 EASTERN NEW MEXICO UNIVERSITY, NM 119 EDINBORO UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, PA 43 FELICIAN COLLEGE, NJ 58 FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY, MI 33 FRIENDS UNIVERSITY, KS 68 GARDNER-WEBB UNIVERSITY, NC 45 GOVERNORS STATE UNIVERSITY, IL 361 GRAMBLING STATE UNIVERSITY, LA 1,242 HOLY FAMILY UNIVERSITY, PA 123 HOUSTON BAPTIST UNIVERSITY, TX 102 HUMBOLDT STATE UNIVERSITY, CA 39 KEAN UNIVERSITY, NJ 347 LAMAR UNIVERSITY, TX 64 LEE UNIVERSITY, TN 127 LETOURNEAU UNIVERSITY, TX 400 LINDENWOOD UNIVERSITY, MO 206 Only those institutions testing 30 or more students in a college class were included in the analyses for that college class.

2 Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2007 through June 2012 List of Institutions Number of School Name Students MAHARISHI UNIVERSITY OF MANAGEMENT, IA 98 MCNEESE STATE UNIVERSITY, LA 2,619 MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY - MANKATO, MN 47 MISSISSIPPI COLLEGE, MS 152 MISSISSIPPI VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY, MS 235 MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY, MO 1,499 MONMOUTH UNIVERSITY, NJ 41 MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY, NJ 83 NICHOLLS STATE UNIVERSITY, LA 1,233 NORFOLK STATE UNIVERSITY, VA 78 NORTH CENTRAL MISSOURI COLLEGE, MO 313 NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY, IL 583 NORTHWEST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY, MO 3,570 NORTHWESTERN OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY, OK 144 OAKLAND CITY UNIVERSITY, IN 102 OUACHITA TECHNICAL COLLEGE, AR 39 PALM BEACH ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY, FL 380 PFEIFFER UNIVERSITY, NC 260 PHILADELPHIA BIBLICAL UNIVERSITY, PA 73 QUEENS UNIVERSITY OF CHARLOTTE, NC 36 RIVIER COLLEGE, NH 61 SAINT LEO UNIVERSITY, FL 329 SHENANDOAH UNIVERSITY, VA 82 SOUTHEAST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY, MO 609 SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY EDWARDSVILLE, IL 92 SOUTHWEST BAPTIST UNIVERSITY, MO 105 ST. AMBROSE UNIVERSITY, IA 89 ST. MARY'S UNIVERSITY, TX 45 STEPHEN F. AUSTIN STATE UNIVERSITY, TX 101 SULLIVAN UNIVERSITY, KY 822 TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY - TEXARKANA, TX 114 TEXAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY, TX 87 THOMAS MORE COLLEGE, KY 81 TIFFIN UNIVERSITY, OH 135 TOURO COLLEGE - NY, NY 118 TROY UNIVERSITY, AL 3,569 TRUMAN STATE UNIVERSITY, MO 97 TUSCULUM COLLEGE, TN 76 UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL MISSOURI, MO 1,873 UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA, OK 536 UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 209 UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON - CLEAR LAKE, TX 200 UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND - EASTERN SHORE, MD 123 UNIVERSITY OF MOBILE, AL 32 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN INDIANA, IN 1,643 UNIVERSITY OF ST. FRANCIS, IL 43 UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE - CHATTANOOGA, TN 228 UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE - MARTIN, TN 849 UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT TYLER, TX 306 Only those institutions testing 30 or more students in a college class were included in the analyses for that college class.

3 Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2007 through June 2012 List of Institutions Number of School Name Students UNIVERSITY OF WEST ALABAMA, AL 34 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - STOUT, WI 31 WARNER UNIVERSITY, FL 62 WAYLAND BAPTIST UNIVERSITY, TX 271 WESTERN TEXAS COLLEGE, TX 37 WILKES UNIVERSITY, PA 55 WINTHROP UNIVERSITY, SC 83 33,240 Only those institutions testing 30 or more students in a college class were included in the analyses for that college class.

4 Distribution of Institutional Mean Total Scores Mean Number of Percent of Mean Number of Percent of Total Institutions Instns. Total Institutions Instns. Score Below Score Below 470 to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to Total Number of Institutions 97 Mean Std. Dev. 6.90

5 Distribution of Institutional Mean Subscores Skills Subscores Critical Thinking Reading Writing Math No. of Pct. No. of Pct. No. of Pct. No. of Pct. Mean Subscore Instns. Below Instns. Below Instns. Below Instns. Below 126 to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to Number of Institutions Mean Standard Deviation

6 Distribution of Institutional Mean Subscores (continued) Context-based Subscores Humanities Social Sciences Natural Sciences No. of Pct. No. of Pct. No. of Pct. Mean Subscore Instns. Below Instns. Below Instns. Below 126 to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to Number of Institutions Mean Standard Deviation

7 Distribution of Individual Students' Total Scores Scaled Percent Scaled Percent Scaled Percent Scaled Percent Score Below Score Below Score Below Score Below 500 > > > > > > > > < < < < No. of Students 24,716* 90th percentile 469 Mean th percentile 453 Standard Deviation th percentile th percentile th percentile 421 *The score distribution used to compute these statistics has been modified, to prevent the statistics from being dominated by a few very large institutions. If an institution contributed more than 1100 students to this data set, the score of each of its students has been weighted by the fraction 1100/n, where n is the number of students from that institution. For example, if an institution tested 2200 students, the score of each of its students would receive a weight of 1100/2200 = 1/2. In computing the statistics, each of its students would count only half as much as a student from an institution that tested 1100 or fewer students. Therefore, an institution testing 2200 students would influence the statistics just as much as if it had tested only 1100 students.

8 Distribution of Individual Students' Subscores Scaled Score Skills Subscores: Percent of Students Below Each Scaled Score Critical Context-Based Subscores: Pct. of Students Below Each Scaled Score Social Natural Thinking Reading Writing Mathematics Humanities Sciences Sciences 130 >99 98 >99 >99 >99 >99 > >99 97 >99 >99 99 >99 > >99 94 >99 >99 98 >99 > > < <1 <1 1 <1 1 < <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 < Number of Students 24,716* 24,716* 24,716* 24,716* 24,716* 24,716* 24,716* Mean Score Standard Deviation th percentile th percentile th percentile th percentile th percentile *The score distribution used to compute these statistics has been modified, to prevent the statistics from being dominated by a few very large institutions. If an institution contributed more than 1100 students to this data set, the score of each of its students has been weighted by the fraction 1100/n, where n is the number of students from that institution. For example, if an institution tested 2200 students, the score of each of its students would receive a weight of 1100/2200 = 1/2. In computing the statistics, each of its students would count only half as much as a student from an institution that tested 1100 or fewer students. Therefore, an institution testing 2200 students would influence the statistics just as much as if it had tested only 1100 students.

9 Summary of Proficiency Classifications Percent of Students Classified as Skill Dimension and Level Not Proficient Marginal Proficient Critical Thinking 5% 16% 79% Reading, Level 2 33% 20% 47% Reading, Level 1 64% 20% 16% Writing, Level 3 6% 24% 70% Writing, Level 2 16% 37% 47% Writing, Level 1 60% 28% 11% Mathematics, Level 3 6% 14% 81% Mathematics, Level 2 24% 25% 51% Mathematics, Level 1 49% 26% 25% Total Number of Students: 33,240 Weighted Number of Students: 24,716* *The score distribution used to compute these statistics has been modified, to prevent the statistics from being dominated by a few very large institutions. If an institution contributed more than 1100 students to this data set, the score of each of its students has been weighted by the fraction 1100/n, where n is the number of students from that institution. For example, if an institution tested 2200 students, the score of each of its students would receive a weight of 1100/2200 = 1/2. In computing the statistics, each of its students would count only half as much as a student from an institution that tested 1100 or fewer students. Therefore, an institution testing 2200 students would influence the statistics just as much as if it had tested only 1100 students.

10 Demographic Summary Percent in Category Unweighted data Weighted data* Demographic Category AGE Under 20 3% 3% 20 to 29 81% 81% 30 to 39 9% 9% 40 to 49 5% 5% 50 to 59 1% 2% 60 or more <1% <1% GENDER Male 38% 38% Female 62% 62% ETHNICITY American Indian/Alaskan Native 1% 1% Asian/Asian American/Pacific Is. 3% 3% African American 17% 17% Black Hispanic 1% 1% Hispanic 4% 5% Latin American 1% 1% White 70% 68% Other 4% 5% BEST LANGUAGE English 89% 89% Other Language 8% 8% Both Equal 3% 4% *The score distribution used to compute these statistics has been modified, to prevent the statistics from being dominated by a few very large institutions. If an institution contributed more than 1100 students to this data set, the score of each of its students has been weighted by the fraction 1100/n, where n is the number of students from that institution. For example, if an institution tested 2200 students, the score of each of its students would receive a weight of 1100/2200 = 1/2. In computing the statistics, each of its students would count only half as much as a student from an institution that tested 1100 or fewer students. Therefore, an institution testing 2200 students would influence the statistics just as much as if it had tested only 1100 students.

11 Demographic Summary Percent in Category Unweighted data Weighted data* Demographic Category ENROLLMENT STATUS Full Time 90% 90% Part Time 10% 10% CREDIT HRS TRANSFERRED Not a Transfer 58% 56% 0-15 Hours Transferred 8% 9% Hours Transferred 10% 10% >30 Hours Transferred 24% 26% HOURS WORKED FOR WAGES None 22% 22% 1-15 Hours 25% 25% Hours 29% 29% >30 Hours 24% 24% CUMULATIVE GPA % 28% % 35% % 27% % 9% % 1% Less than 1.00 <1% <1% *The score distribution used to compute these statistics has been modified, to prevent the statistics from being dominated by a few very large institutions. If an institution contributed more than 1100 students to this data set, the score of each of its students has been weighted by the fraction 1100/n, where n is the number of students from that institution. For example, if an institution tested 2200 students, the score of each of its students would receive a weight of 1100/2200 = 1/2. In computing the statistics, each of its students would count only half as much as a student from an institution that tested 1100 or fewer students. Therefore, an institution testing 2200 students would influence the statistics just as much as if it had tested only 1100 students.