List of Institutions Number of School Name

Transcription

1 Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2007 through June 2012 List of Institutions Number of School Name Students ALBERTUS MAGNUS COLLEGE, CT 600 ALICE LLOYD COLLEGE, KY 640 ANDERSON UNIVERSITY - SOUTH CAROLINA, SC 2,048 ASBURY COLLEGE, KY 415 ASHFORD UNIVERSITY, IA 762 AVE MARIA UNIVERSITY AT NAPLES, FL 279 BENEDICT COLLEGE, SC 662 BENNETT COLLEGE FOR WOMEN, NC 345 BLUE MOUNTAIN COLLEGE, MS 240 BLUFFTON UNIVERSITY, OH 1,015 BRESCIA UNIVERSITY, KY 303 BREWTON-PARKER COLLEGE, GA 489 BRYAN COLLEGE, TN 39 CAZENOVIA COLLEGE, NY 436 CHOWAN UNIVERSITY, NC 86 CLAYTON STATE UNIVERSITY, GA 1,270 COASTAL CAROLINA UNIVERSITY, SC 99 COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY - PUEBLO, CO 164 CONCORDIA COLLEGE, MN 1,316 COVENANT COLLEGE, GA 152 DENISON UNIVERSITY, OH 204 DICKINSON STATE UNIVERSITY, ND 1,174 DORDT COLLEGE, IA 694 EASTERN MENNONITE UNIVERSITY, VA 174 ECKERD COLLEGE, FL 253 ELIZABETH CITY STATE UNIVERSITY, NC 1,220 ENDICOTT COLLEGE, MA 601 ERSKINE COLLEGE, SC 408 FERRUM COLLEGE, VA 493 FISHER COLLEGE, MA 377 FISK UNIVERSITY, TN 413 FLORIDA SOUTHERN COLLEGE, FL 39 HESSER COLLEGE, NH 46 HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY, NC 480 HUSTON-TILLOTSON UNIVERSITY, TX 342 JAMESTOWN COLLEGE, ND 60 JOHNSON C. SMITH UNIVERSITY, NC 865 LAGRANGE COLLEGE, GA 446 LANDER UNIVERSITY, SC 766 LIMESTONE COLLEGE - MIDSTATE, SC 90 MARANATHA BAPTIST BIBLE COLLEGE, WI 863 Only those institutions testing 30 or more students in a college class were included in the analyses for that college class.

2 Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2007 through June 2012 List of Institutions Number of School Name Students MARIETTA COLLEGE, OH 641 MASSACHUSETTS MARITIME ACADEMY, MA 1,147 MATER ECCLESIAE COLLEGE, RI 39 MEREDITH COLLEGE, NC 397 MIDWAY COLLEGE, KY 451 MILLIGAN COLLEGE, TN 309 MISSOURI SOUTHERN STATE UNIVERSITY, MO 2,874 MOREHOUSE COLLEGE, GA 1,779 MOUNT OLIVE COLLEGE, NC 176 MOUNT VERNON NAZARENE UNIVERSITY, OH 656 NEWBERRY COLLEGE, SC 217 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE, MN 121 OHIO CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY, OH 58 PATRICK HENRY COLLEGE, VA 206 PRESENTATION COLLEGE, SD 498 RANDOLPH-MACON COLLEGE, VA 41 REINHARDT COLLEGE, GA 344 ROBERT B. MILLER COLLEGE, THE, MI 53 ROGERS STATE UNIVERSITY, OK 77 SAINT JOSEPH'S COLLEGE - IN, IN 544 SAINT MARY-OF-THE-WOODS COLLEGE, IN 378 SHEPHERD UNIVERSITY, WV 86 SOUTH COLLEGE, TN 175 SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY, FL 1,115 SOUTHERN CATHOLIC COLLEGE, GA 135 SPELMAN COLLEGE, GA 1,886 STEVENSON UNIVERSITY, MD 531 TAYLOR UNIVERSITY - FORT WAYNE, IN 74 TAYLOR UNIVERSITY - UPLAND, IN 105 TENNESSEE WESLEYAN COLLEGE, TN 625 TOCCOA FALLS COLLEGE, GA 66 UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON, WV 301 UNIVERSITY OF MAINE AT FORT KENT, ME 60 UNIVERSITY OF MAINE AT PRESQUE ISLE, ME 336 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA - UPSTATE, SC 91 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA - ST. PETERSBURG, FL 129 UNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS, KY 912 UNIVERSITY OF THE OZARKS, AR 103 UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - PARKSIDE, WI 297 VANGUARD UNIVERSITY, CA 291 WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY, WV 67 WINSTON-SALEM STATE UNIVERSITY, NC ,251 Only those institutions testing 30 or more students in a college class were included in the analyses for that college class.

3 Distribution of Institutional Mean Total Scores Mean Number of Percent of Mean Number of Percent of Total Institutions Instns. Total Institutions Instns. Score Below Score Below 470 to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to Total Number of Institutions 83 Mean Std. Dev. 9.72

4 Distribution of Institutional Mean Subscores Skills Subscores Critical Thinking Reading Writing Math No. of Pct. No. of Pct. No. of Pct. No. of Pct. Mean Subscore Instns. Below Instns. Below Instns. Below Instns. Below 126 to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to Number of Institutions Mean Standard Deviation

5 Distribution of Institutional Mean Subscores (continued) Context-based Subscores Humanities Social Sciences Natural Sciences No. of Pct. No. of Pct. No. of Pct. Mean Subscore Instns. Below Instns. Below Instns. Below 126 to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to Number of Institutions Mean Standard Deviation

6 Distribution of Individual Students' Total Scores Scaled Percent Scaled Percent Scaled Percent Scaled Percent Score Below Score Below Score Below Score Below 500 > > > > > > > > > < < No. of Students 37,664* 90th percentile 460 Mean th percentile 446 Standard Deviation th percentile th percentile th percentile 416 *The score distribution used to compute these statistics has been modified, to prevent the statistics from being dominated by a few very large institutions. If an institution contributed more than 1500 students to this data set, the score of each of its students has been weighted by the fraction 1500/n, where n is the number of students from that institution. For example, if an institution tested 3000 students, the score of each of its students would receive a weight of 1500/3000 = 1/2. In computing the statistics, each of its students would count only half as much as a student from an institution that tested 1500 or fewer students. Therefore, an institution testing 3000 students would influence the statistics just as much as if it had tested only 1500 students.

7 Scaled Score Entering Freshman (No hours completed) Distribution of Individual Students' Subscores Skills Subscores: Percent of Students Below Each Scaled Score Critical Context-Based Subscores: Pct. of Students Below Each Scaled Score Social Natural Thinking Reading Writing Mathematics Humanities Sciences Sciences 130 >99 99 >99 >99 >99 >99 > >99 98 >99 >99 99 >99 > >99 96 >99 >99 99 >99 > > >99 > <1 1 < <1 <1 1 <1 1 < Number of Students 37,664* 37,664* 37,664* 37,664* 37,664* 37,664* 37,664* Mean Score Standard Deviation th percentile th percentile th percentile th percentile th percentile *The score distribution used to compute these statistics has been modified, to prevent the statistics from being dominated by a few very large institutions. If an institution contributed more than 1500 students to this data set, the score of each of its students has been weighted by the fraction 1500/n, where n is the number of students from that institution. For example, if an institution tested 3000 students, the score of each of its students would receive a weight of 1500/3000 = 1/2. In computing the statistics, each of its students would count only half as much as a student from an institution that tested 1500 or fewer students. Therefore, an institution testing 3000 students would influence the statistics just as much as if it had tested only 1500 students.

8 Summary of Proficiency Classifications Percent of Students Classified as Skill Dimension and Level Not Proficient Marginal Proficient Critical Thinking 3% 10% 88% Reading, Level 2 22% 17% 61% Reading, Level 1 49% 25% 26% Writing, Level 3 4% 19% 77% Writing, Level 2 12% 30% 58% Writing, Level 1 50% 33% 17% Mathematics, Level 3 4% 11% 85% Mathematics, Level 2 18% 23% 58% Mathematics, Level 1 42% 29% 30% Total Number of Students: 40,251 Weighted Number of Students: 37,664* *The score distribution used to compute these statistics has been modified, to prevent the statistics from being dominated by a few very large institutions. If an institution contributed more than 1500 students to this data set, the score of each of its students has been weighted by the fraction 1500/n, where n is the number of students from that institution. For example, if an institution tested 3000 students, the score of each of its students would receive a weight of 1500/3000 = 1/2. In computing the statistics, each of its students would count only half as much as a student from an institution that tested 1500 or fewer students. Therefore, an institution testing 3000 students would influence the statistics just as much as if it had tested only 1500 students.

9 Demographic Summary Percent in Category Unweighted data Weighted data* Demographic Category AGE Under 20 94% 94% 20 to 29 4% 4% 30 to 39 1% 1% 40 to 49 <1% <1% 50 to 59 <1% <1% 60 or more <1% <1% GENDER Male 43% 43% Female 57% 57% ETHNICITY American Indian/Alaskan Native 1% 1% Asian/Asian American/Pacific Is. 2% 2% African American 26% 25% Black Hispanic 1% 1% Hispanic 3% 3% Latin American 1% 1% White 63% 63% Other 4% 4% BEST LANGUAGE English 90% 90% Other Language 7% 7% Both Equal 3% 3% *The score distribution used to compute these statistics has been modified, to prevent the statistics from being dominated by a few very large institutions. If an institution contributed more than 1500 students to this data set, the score of each of its students has been weighted by the fraction 1500/n, where n is the number of students from that institution. For example, if an institution tested 3000 students, the score of each of its students would receive a weight of 1500/3000 = 1/2. In computing the statistics, each of its students would count only half as much as a student from an institution that tested 1500 or fewer students. Therefore, an institution testing 3000 students would influence the statistics just as much as if it had tested only 1500 students.

10 Demographic Summary Percent in Category Unweighted data Weighted data* Demographic Category ENROLLMENT STATUS Full Time 98% 98% Part Time 2% 2% CREDIT HRS TRANSFERRED Not a Transfer 98% 98% 0-15 Hours Transferred 1% 1% Hours Transferred <1% <1% >30 Hours Transferred <1% <1% HOURS WORKED FOR WAGES None 43% 43% 1-15 Hours 30% 30% Hours 21% 21% >30 Hours 6% 6% CUMULATIVE GPA % 26% % 42% % 24% % 7% % 1% Less than 1.00 <1% <1% *The score distribution used to compute these statistics has been modified, to prevent the statistics from being dominated by a few very large institutions. If an institution contributed more than 1500 students to this data set, the score of each of its students has been weighted by the fraction 1500/n, where n is the number of students from that institution. For example, if an institution tested 3000 students, the score of each of its students would receive a weight of 1500/3000 = 1/2. In computing the statistics, each of its students would count only half as much as a student from an institution that tested 1500 or fewer students. Therefore, an institution testing 3000 students would influence the statistics just as much as if it had tested only 1500 students.