How To Build A Building In Finnish Korea

Similar documents
Towards bigger buildings

Metsä Wood. Jussi Björman. R&D Engineer

SHOTS IN THE DARK Building Concepts guiding the development of Energy-efficient construction. Kimmo Lylykangas architect SAFA

METNET Annual Seminar Paper Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir TURKEY October Olli Ilveskoski HAMK University of Applied Sciences

Brock Commons Phase 1 University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

Wood based urban construction - is wood industry ready to take the challenge? 24 May 2013 / Matti Mikkola, SVP, Stora Enso Building & Living

Skagershuset, Stockholm. Moelven SUSTAINABLE HOUSING THE WAY IS WOOD

New Ontario Building Code Requirements for Mid-rise Wood Frame Buildings

Homeowner s Guide to Residential Building Permits

Saint Cloud Business Center

Green Affordable Housing Development Case Eco-Viikki, Finland

Advantages and Disadvantages of Timber Frame Construction

The Lambton County Homeowner's BUILDING PERMIT INFORMATION GUIDE

Building flexibility management

Does Green Building pay? Danish decisions and German experiences Green Building Council Denmark and AHK in Copenhagen the

201 WATER STREET FORWARDERS MUSEUM AND VISITORS INFORMATION CENTRE

Luja An expert in concrete construction for a demanding environment. a history of steady growth

Lappeenranta Climate Capital of FINLAND

GASIFICATION FROM THE VIEWPOINT OF THE FINNISH FOREST INDUSTRY

Prefabricated building PVC vertical sliding window

School in Schwanenstadt, Austria

ELIGIBLE REPAIR PROJECT PARAMETERS

COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT HVAC SYSTEMS IN MULTI- STOREY APARTMENT BUILDINGS IN HELSINKI

Document type: Practice Note Title: External and internal membranes Document number: AC2234 Version: Purpose

Renovation instructions

Schedule B to By-law

Building Code Clarifications - 7. Fire Resistance

Schedule B to By-law Part A Fees Payable for Permits

WORLD S TALLEST TIMBER BUILDING, BERGEN

SURE case. VAV Sahatie VAV Asunnot Oy 1

Painting, Estimating. Hourly Rate Guide

7 th Semester Final Project Kontorhus Djursland. George-Diego Matei AH 71P-S15

COMMON FOR ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS Excerpts from HB 2284, 82 nd R

technology UICK progressive sustainable any design, any shape, any colour, anywhere you like!

Regional natural park of Massif des Bauges

8-STOREY TIMBER BUILDING, Bad Aibling D

COMPARISON OF ELECTRICITY GENERATION COSTS

Energy Use in Residential Housing: A Comparison of Insulating Concrete Form and Wood Frame Walls

A Carbon Footprint of an Office Building

Renovation and upgrading of Waterlandplein post-war housing blocks, Amsterdam

Downtown Incentives Program

THE EUROPEAN STEEL TECHNOLOGY PLATFORM : ambitious steel R&D programmes for the construction sector

Decree of the Ministry of the Environment on fire safety of buildings

RESNET Building Performance Conference Orlando, FL March 2011

STANDARD FEATURES & PROCESS- NEW HOME CONSTRUCTION. Now offered for a limited period of time, free solar with each home!

Climate Commitments and Planning Actions in the City of Helsinki

Building Systems by Stora Enso. Residential multi-storey buildings

ADVANCED ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN ESSENTIAL CURRICULUM

Step by Step instructions How to screw in wood and plastic

Facility Assessment for East Main Street, Huntley, IL

Active Roofs and Facades in Sustainable Renovation

PRT-Forest creates living quality

DESIGNERS GUIDE TO DOMESTIC CONSERVATORIES

Structure Survey Findings:

Dow Corning PROPRIETARY. Dow Corning. A Thermal Modelling Comparison of Typical Curtain Wall Systems

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO

MULTI-PURPOSE TEMPORARY BUILDINGS

Innovative Procedures Energy Efficient Environmentally friendly building modules

Cody Park One of Ark s high integrity data centre campus sites

Frequently Asked Questions

Repair Project for April 7, 2009

Sample Drawing Package for One and Two Family Dwelling Applications

Päästöt ilmaan puunhankintaketjussa. Ympäristönäkökohtien huomioonottaminen puunkorjuun arjessa Metsätieteen päivä Arto Kariniemi

How To Make An Oriented Strand Board

Energy efficiency building standards in Japan

RENOVATION OF SCHOOL #171 SPORT COMPLEX

ATTENTION BUILDERS, CONTRACTORS AND DEVELOPERS

48. AQUARIUM. Aquarium. Classification: Cluster: Location: Close to junction of Inselrhue and Loiter Way, Belle Isle. Total Area: No.

Distributed Energy Systems

STATIONARY BIOMASS PROCESSORS CHIPPING ENERGY WOOD WITH LOWER COSTS

The Integrated Design Process

This policy is the guiding document for all development within that area of Cable Beach pertaining to the Cable Beach Development Plan.

Conceptual Model for Mapping Service Innovations: Case of Forestry Services in Finland

IFE Level 4 Certificate in Fire Science and Fire Safety (HL)

Information Management of Bioenergy Supply Chains

ReUSE VTT s research outcomes from project ReUSE. Final seminar in Tampere Petr Hradil VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

BMIC S APPETITE GUIDE EFFECTIVE JUNE 2013

European Wood Construction Managers Online Training

Challenging the possibilities

Outlook for the construction industry. Part One: BETA monitoring report Joinery ITO August 2013

BELL ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE PLANNING

Green and Sustainable Buildings

Timber Pest Inspection Agreement. Ph: Fax: Mobile: Purchaser: Vendor (If Known): Re Property to be Inspection at:

Student Academic Achievement Committee (SAAC) Standardized Report Form

fire separating walls #2

LEED PRESENTATION OUTLINE

BUILDING SAFETY UNIT

SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT OR SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE APPLICATION REVIEW

PROPOSAL. Prepared for: Craig Mottram & Family, 118 Rangoon Rd. Prepared by: Carlos Andrade, Owner & Operator. Brandon Andrade, Project Coordinator

Presentation in Riga and Tallinn, May 2006

Promotion of small scale electricity generation in Finland

Ruukki s general presentation

Presenting the Cubierta Solar Project

Building Condition Assessment: North Howard Street Baltimore, Maryland

Accela Automation User Manual for Gwinnett County Automated Inspection Request System (IVR)

SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT/DAMAGE NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS

Doughty Environmental Hygiene Associates

Making Your Home Ready For Solar Water Heating

Decree of the Ministry of the Environment. on fire safety of garages

ESTIMATE ORIG. ESTIMATE: TOTAL: $204,249 DATE: 01/15/08 DESCRIPTION OF WORK QUANTITY DIVISION TOTAL

Transcription:

Mikko Viljakainen (Arch, Lis. Tech) Managing director, Finnish Wood Council 2015 Wood Symposium, Vancouver THE RENEISSANCE IN FINNISH INDUSTRIALIZED TIMBER CONSTRUCTION METHODS 3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen

Europe can be divided into three geographical markets Differences in company structures and customer demand Finland 2014 Population 5 400 000 Total solution New residential construction < 27 000 Block of flats ~ 15-17 000 Engineered and erected Product with added features 3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen

Challenges Strict regulations Urban focus Low tech image and no R&D Labour intensive on site Lack of skilled labour Low productivity Product polarisation Low prefabrication Production orientation Poor quality 2/3/2015 Mikko Viljakainen High costs and prices Environmental footprint

Need for a change provides opportunities! 3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen

The biggest potential for wood is where the decisions are made professionally and where the buildings are big 100 14000 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 Puun Market osuus share of runkorakenteissa wood in frames % Puun Market osuus share of ulkoverhouksissa wood in facades % Markkinoiden Total potential kokonaisvolyymi (1000m3) (1000 m3) Source: Tilastokeskus, Rakentamisen tilastot. VTT

The growth of Finnish forests is over 100 mill. m3 per year FOREST BALANCE IN FINLAND 1960-2011 mill. m 3 120 Annual increment Total drain Industrial roundwood 100 80 60 40 20 0 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 Source: Metla

2009 Internationally competitive wood construction industry 1 Internationally relevant reference buildings 2 Most advanced building regulations 3 Top competence and know how 4 Proprietary solutions for new construction and renovations

B-s2, d0 D-s2, d0 Block of flats up to 8 floors P2 fire class maximum 8 storeys with REI 60 structures Sprinkler system is required K 2 10 (4 floors) or K 2 30 (5-8) fire protected structures A-class insulation materials Special requirements for eaves, wooden facades (flame traps), emergency exits, balconies 1997 2011 3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen

B-s2, d0 D-s2, d0 Town houses up to 4 floors P2 fire class maximum 4 floors with REI 60 structures Fire protections of the structures K 2 30 A-class insulation materials No sprinkler system requirement 1997 2011 3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen

Technical challenges are solved! 4 1 4 1 3 3 2 2

3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen

3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen

Calculation tools 3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen

Instructions and data sheets 3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen

The new industrial building methods Hybrid technology Post and beam Volumetric 3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen

Hybrid technology 3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen

3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen

3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen

3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen

3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen

3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen

3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen

Photos: Tiia Sorsa, Reponen Oy

Photos: Tiia Sorsa, Reponen Oy

3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen Photos: Tiia Sorsa, Reponen Oy

3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen Photos: Tiia Sorsa, Reponen Oy

3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen

Photos: Tiia Sorsa, Reponen Oy

3.2.2015 Kuva: Rakennusliike Reponen

Photos: Tiia Sorsa, Reponen Oy

Photos: Tiia Sorsa, Reponen Oy

Photos: Tiia Sorsa, Reponen Oy

3.2.2015 Sweco

3.2.2015 RKL Reponen

3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen

Post and beam technology 3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen Photos: Metsä Wood

3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen Photos: Metsä Wood

Photos: Metsä Wood

Photos: Metsä Wood 3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen

Photos: Metsä Wood 3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen

Photos: Metsä Wood

Photos: Metsä Wood

3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen

3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen Photos: Metsä Wood

Volumetric elements 3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen Photos: Stora Enso

Photos: Stora Enso

Photos: Stora Enso

Photos: Stora Enso 3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen

3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen Photos: Stora Enso

Photos: Stora Enso 3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen

Photos: Stora Enso

Photos: Stora Enso

3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen Photos: Stora Enso

Photos: Stora Enso

Photos: OOPEAA and Stora Enso

3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen

Photos: OOPEAA and Stora Enso

Photos: OOPEAA and Stora Enso

3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen

3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen

Photos: Stora Enso 3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen

Photos: Stora Enso

RunkoPES Open Industrial standard 3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen

One way to design several to construct 3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen

Clear benefits: Shorter construction time saves money! 3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen

Traditional construction process Traditional construction 11 14 months Design Manufacturing structural components Foundations 1st floor 2nd floor 3rd floor 4th floor 5th floor 6th floor Roof HVAC Int. and ext. finishes Landscape

Construction process under a tent Wood panels under tent 5 7 months Design Manufacturing structural components Foundations 1st floor 2nd floor 3rd floor 4th floor 5th floor 6th floor Roof HVAC Int. and ext. finishes Landscape

Process of the modular construction Modular construction 3 6 months Design Manufacturing volumetric components Structures HVAC Int. and ext. finishes Foundations Roof 1st 6th floor HVAC connections Int. and ext. finishes Landscape

Traditional construction 11 14 months Design Manufacturing structural components Foundations 1st floor 2nd floor 3rd floor 4th floor Modular construction Design 5th floor 6th floor Roof 3 6 months HVAC Int. and ext. finishes Landscape Manufacturing volumetric components Structures HVAC Int. and ext. finishes Foundations Roof 1st 6th floor HVAC connections Int. and ext. finishes Landscape

Construction speed Traditional construction Modular construction

Builder's perspective 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% Profit Company overhead costs Extra site costs (tent) Extra fire safety costs Labour costs Material costs Project overhead costs 10% 0% Traditional Wood modular ideally Wood modular in reality The allowed maximum costs of subsidized residential construction Outside Helsinki region 2 596 /m2 Helsinki region 3 048 /m2

Investor s perspective Traditional construction Design Manufacturing structural components Foundations 1st floor 2nd floor 3rd floor 4th floor 5th floor 6th floor Roof Modular construction Design HVAC Int. and ext. finishes Landscape Manufacturing volumetric components Structures HVAC Int. and ext. finishes Foundations Roof 1st 6th floor HVAC connections Int. and ext. finishes Landscape

Investor s perspective Traditional construction 13 16 months Design Manufacturing structural components Foundations 1st floor 2nd floor 3rd floor 4th floor 5th floor 6th floor Roof Modular construction Design HVAC Int. and ext. finishes Landscape ROI Manufacturing volumetric components Structures HVAC Int. and ext. finishes Foundations Roof 1st 6th floor HVAC connections Int. and ext. finishes Landscape

Investor s perspective Traditional construction 13 16 months Design Manufacturing structural components Foundations 1st floor 2nd floor 3rd floor 4th floor Modular construction Design 5th floor 6th floor Roof HVAC Int. and ext. finishes 1-2 months Landscape ROI Manufacturing volumetric components Structures HVAC Int. and ext. finishes Foundations Roof 1st 6th floor HVAC connections Int. and ext. finishes Landscape ROI = Return of investments

Added value! 3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen

Weather protection provides better quality and working conditions 3.2.2015 Titta Vuori, Moderlark

100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Customer opinion Vähintään Satisfaction tyytyväisiä rate % FWR/TTY survey 2011: 6 buildings from 1996 2003 Flats 157 (24 % of all) 118 answers (75 %) Owners 58% Rentals 42%

6H 2 O + 6CO 2 C 6 H 12 O 6 + 6O 2 3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen

Concrete house Betonitalo Practical differences of footprint case Metla Raw materials (tn) Source: VTT TIEDOTTEITA 2342 Puutalo Wood house 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 Concrete house Betonitalo Wood house Puutalo Energy consumption (GJ) 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 C 2 O emissions (tn) Concrete house Betonitalo Wood house Puutalo 0 200 400 600 800 1000 3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen

Concrete house Betonitalo Practical differences of footprint case Viikki Raw materials (tn) Source: VTT Rakennustekniikka Wood house Puutalo 0 100 200 300 400 500 Concrete house Betonitalo Wood house Puutalo Concrete house Betonitalo Wood house Puutalo Energy consumption (GJ) 180 190 200 210 220 230 C 2 O emissions (tn) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen

Summary of the 18 environmental comparisons CO 2 FOOTPRINT CAN BE CUT INTO HALF CO 2 comparisons of 18 different buildings Difference of the CO 2 footprint 120% 100% 80% 94% 60% 55% 40% 20% 0% 8% WOOD FRAME OTHER FRAME MATERIAL Source: Summary of the environmental comparisons, Kuittinen 2014

Potential according the town plans (m 2 ) = about 7000 flats during next yeas 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 2013 2014 2015 200 0 Flats Source: Ministry of employment and economy Wood Construction Program 9.10.2013

More information: 3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen

3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen

3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen

Thank you!

3.2.2015 Mikko Viljakainen