MBTA Green Line Positive Train Control Project

Similar documents
Risk Analysis of a CBTC Signaling System

Office of Safety and Compliance

Railroad Accident Brief

Cisco Positive Train Control: Enhancing End-to-End Rail Safety

Accident / Incident Reporting Guidelines for Provincial Railways

Preventing Workplace Injuries. Mike Griffiths, HM Inspector of Health and Safety

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

Car Crash Design Lab

Railway Simulation & Timetable Planning

Briefing On New Jersey High Speed Rail Improvement Program. October 10, 2012

Safe Driver Insurance Plan

European New Car Assessment Program (EuroNCAP) and Crash Test Ratings of New Vehicles

Testimony of Ann Wilson House Energy & Commerce Committee Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing and Trade, October 21, 2015

APPENDIX A Dallas-Fort Worth Region Transportation System Management Strategies and Projects

Jim Kelly. Chuck Morganson

TEST ON Driving Safely Among Bicyclists and Pedestrians

ATTACHMENT TO NOTICE TO FIXED GUIDEWAY SYSTEM VEHICLE SUPPLIERS REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI 001)

The risk of derailment and collision, and safety systems to prevent the risk

RATP safety approach for railway signalling systems

MBTA Fiscal and Management Control Board

Railroad Safety Data Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Trains crossing at Toronto s Old Mill Station 2009 TTC. Train Control

CalMod Design-Build Electrification Services

TO PREVENT SPEED VIOLATIONS AND TO PROVIDE TRAFFIC SAFETY WITH MICROPROCESSOR-BASED AUTOMATIC VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL SYSTEM

4. Technology Assessment

Project: mticketing for Commuter Rail and Ferry Services

CTAA - SAFETY AND SECURITY OFFICER PROGRAM (CSSO)

Fleet Management Framework

Module M3. Managing incidents, floods and snow. GE/RT8000/M3 Rule Book. Issue 2. September 2015

Nationwide Fixed Guideway

Defensive Driving While Towing a Trailer By Elizabeth Koncki, Maryland Department of Agriculture

Contract No. E22PS02. PROJECT CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PLAN (CMP) for PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND DESIGN/BUILD PROCUREMENT

Switchgear Application Issues for Mission Critical Power Systems, Part One

Bicycle Safety Quiz Answers Parental Responsibilities

Program Management. APWA North Carolina Chapter. Design-Build: Will it Work for You? William Palmieri, P.E.

20XX. Car safety rating 2015 by Folksam

Transit in the United States 3. Operating Costs and Performance Measures 13. Quality of Transit Service 19. ADA Compliance Bus 28

FLEET SAFETY INSAFE Safety Consultants Mark McDaniel - Bob Starkey

OPTIMIZING POWER SYSTEM PROTECTION FOR MODERN DATA CENTERS

FTA OVERSIGHT PROGRAMS

Keolis Group Safety organisation an example Fjord1 Partner in Bergen

DRIVING A VEHICLE COVERED ON THE UNIVERSITY MOTOR INSURANCE POLICY DRIVERS HANDBOOK

211 CMR: DIVISION OF INSURANCE 21 APPENDIX A: TRAFFIC LAW VIOLATIONS. The following abbreviations are used in Appendix A:

Massachusetts Private Passenger Automobile Statistical Plan Appendix C Traffic Law Violations

HP DevOps by Design. Your Readiness for Continuous Innovation Rony Van Hove/ April 2 nd, HP Software: Apps meet Ops 2015

Implementing Passenger Information, Entertainment, and Security Systems in Light Rail Transit

Asset Management Systems Information

BENEFIT OF DYNAMIC USE CASES TO EARLY DESIGN A DRIVING ASSISTANCE SYSTEM FOR PEDESTRIAN/TRUCK COLLISION AVOIDANCE

SECTION SYSTEMS INTEGRATION TESTING

Experts in Rail Maintenance and Infrastructure

An Overview of Federal Railroad Administration Research

Information Technology Engineers Examination. Network Specialist Examination. (Level 4) Syllabus. Details of Knowledge and Skills Required for

THE IMPORTANCE OF INSURING YOUR ASSETS

G DATA TechPaper #0275. G DATA Network Monitoring

Reference Title Created Owner Review Reviewed 11/12

Multi Year Budget Plan Development

Self-driving transport, On rails. SimTrans-IDA RISK Seminar June 6 th 2016

School Bus Accident Report

CANADIAN ROAD SAFETY YOUTH CONFERENCE ENFORCEMENT. Police Constable Mike Taylor # 8855 Toronto Police Service

Applying Fixed Route Principles To Improve Paratransit Runcutting. Keith Forstall

Item No Halifax Regional Council January 14, 2014

Atlanta, Georgia Road Test

Integration of PTC and Ride Quality Data. Presented by: Wabtec Railway Electronics, I-ETMS PTC Supplier. and

Bicycle riding is a great way to get into shape

Transit Asset Management MBTA Initiatives

Traffic Incident Management Enhancement (TIME) Blueprint Version 2.0 Executive Summary

ICM Project Station Infrastructure and Equipment

Travel, Transportation Modes and Transportation-Related Expenses

SECURITY AND EMERGENCY VEHICLE MANAGEMENT

Real-time energy and water quality management system designed for success!

PRAIRIE ROSE SCHOOL DIVISION SECTION E: SUPPORT SERVICES (PART 3: TRANSPORTATION)

The partnership has selected three intersections where enforcement, education, and engineering initiatives are being implemented to improve safety:

Deaths/injuries in motor vehicle crashes per million hours spent travelling, July 2008 June 2012 (All ages) Mode of travel

Balancing Active and Passive Safety

RVH/BCH Data Centres Proposals for Surge Protection and Ventilation

Workplace Transport Safety Reversing Vehicles Information Sheet What are the dangers associated with reversing vehicles? Why is reversing a problem?

always in a rush Are you Rushing to work Rushing home Rushing off on vacation?

Transcription:

PRESENTATION MBTA Green Line Positive Train Control Project Presented to: MBTA Board of Directors December 2012

Agenda Project Goal Why Green Line PTC/Evaluation Criteria? Key Findings Maintaining Green Line Service Characteristics Projected Implementation Costs Next Steps Project Implementation Schedule Q&A 2

Project Goal Provide safe, reliable and efficient service to the traveling public Limit the risk of an accident by on the MBTA s Green Line by implementing a Positive Train Control (PTC) system Project divided into three phases: Phase I Vehicle Collision Avoidance Assessment Phase II Condition Assessment Phase III Alternatives Analysis and Recommendations 3

Positive Train Control Positive Train Control is a system to prevent: Train to train collisions Excessive speed derailments, including derailments related to curve restrictions, and slow orders Train incursions into established work zones Movement through main line switch in the incorrect position. 4

Why Green Line PTC? The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigation of a Green Line May 2008 incident, which involved one fatality and multiple injuries, concluded: This accident could have been prevented had the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Green Line been equipped with a positive train control system that could have intervened to stop train 3667 before it could strike the rear of train 3681. Synergies of PTC and Green Line state of good repair investments, Track switch replacement Microprocessor interlockings Replacement of obsolete signal components Improved communications (Fiber backbone) 5

MBTA Green Line PTC Phase III Alternatives Analysis Evaluation Criteria Operational Improvements/Impact Order of Magnitude Cost In service History System Design Principles Impact on Collision Avoidance Vehicle Considerations Infrastructure Improvement Modification and Expansion Fall back Operations Additional Operational Advantages Feasibility of Implementation 6

Green Line PTC Key Findings Maintaining Green Line Service Characteristics Green Line with each of the 3 PTC Technologies (Moving Block, Virtual Block, Distance-to-Go) was simulated. PTC results in degradations in travel times, passenger wait times, and throughputs PTC will require mitigation in order to maintain current Green Line customer experience. Three mitigation scenarios based upon speed improvements were simulated. Speed Improvements Infrastructure Improvements Three Car Operations Mitigation strategies improved throughput and travel times. 7

Green Line PTC Key Findings Scores of 3 PTC technologies differ by less than 2 percent. MBTA should progress PTC preliminary design while maintaining ability to support any of the 3 technologies. As detailed plans and specifications are developed, MBTA opt for: Specification of a particular technology or; Selection of a supplier/integrator based on a performance specification not tied to one technology. (Cont.) 8

Average Trip Time Central Subway Baseline Maintaining Green Line Service Characteristics Trip Time PTC without Mitigation Not Feasible PTC with Speed Increases PTC with Mitigation PTC with Operational Changes PTC with Vehicle Changes PTC with Speed Increase & 3-Car Ops Better than or equal to Baseline 9

Passengers per Hour Maintaining Green Line Service Characteristics Central Subway Throughput Baseline PTC without Mitigation Not Feasible PTC with Speed Increases PTC with Mitigation PTC with Operational Changes PTC with Vehicle Changes PTC with Speed Increase & 3-Car Ops Better than or equal to Baseline 10

Projected Implementation Costs Estimated Green Line PTC capital cost (2012 $): CBTC Moving Block - $662 million, CBTC Virtual Block - $645 million DTG estimated - $721 million Estimates include train control and vehicle installation costs for a live system Estimates reflect PTC mitigation, including track upgrades, turnout replacement and additional vehicles/power system upgrades to support 3 car operation 11

Green Line PTC Next Steps Address Green Line train control state of good repair issues, Build out fiber backbone, Track circuit replacement, Replace interlockings for better reliability, make them PTC ready, Track switch replacement (reliability, speed improvements) These projects will make Green Line PTC Ready and provide improved service (better passenger information, reliability and travel times), 12

Green Line PTC Next Steps (GLX) GLX can serve as Green Line PTC initial deployment phase (vehicles, central control and wayside), (Cont.) Improves implementation efficiency by eliminating revenue operating constraints during construction, Provides signal system cost savings versus wayside signaling now and PTC after GLX opens. 13

Green Line PTC Implementation Schedule Standard Procurement (Months) 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 78 84 90 96 102 108 114 120 Consultant Design Prebid/Bid & Award Final Design Submittals & Review Manufacturing of Equipment & Factory Testing Vehicle Installation Field & OCC Installation Testing and Certification Total Duration 18 Months 18 Months 12 Months 30 Months Decision point 22 months 48 Months 60 Months 18 Months 9 Years 14

Summary Begin PTC design and Readiness Projects State of good repair projects also achieve PTC readiness Immediate benefit to riding public through decreased travel times and increased service reliability Green Line Extension (GLX) provides unique opportunity for Testing and Validation 15

Q&A 16