How To Discuss Surveillance Methods In The Transatlantic Dialogue On Surveillance Methods



Similar documents
Sino-German Seminar on Criminal Justice

Conference on. Modernization of the Criminal Justice System in China. Center for Chinese Legal Studies. Opening Ceremony

Distributel Communications Limited. c/o Privacy Officer 177 Nepean St. Suite 300, Ottawa, ON, K2P 0B4. January 20, 2014

29 October 2015 Conference of the Independent Data Protection Authorities of the Federation and the Federal States

Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs - The Secretariat - Background Note on

Max-Planck-Institut für ethnologische Forschung Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology

JIBC Intelligence Analysis and Tactical Criminal Analysis Graduate Certificate Program Overview

Cyber threat intelligence and the lessons from law enforcement. kpmg.com/cybersecurity

7 August I. Introduction

CRIMINAL JUSTICE, BACHELOR OF SCIENCE (B.S.) WITH A CONCENTRATION IN FORENSIC CRIME SCENE INVESTIGATION

Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000

FACEBOOK STATEMENT RICHARD ALLAN NOVEMBER 11, My name is Richard Allan, and I am the Director of Public Policy

Nicole N. Hanson, M.A.

Accession to Convention 108: Benefits and Commitments. Marc Rotenberg, President Electronic Privacy Information Center Washington, DC

Max Planck Society Argentine SECYT

I Module Crime Scene & Forensic Genetics

Policy Instruments & (Side)-Effects

Program Outcomes and Assessment. Learning Outcomes

Memorandum! Is Big Data the right recipe for Europe?

Surveillance Equipment

Law and Policy in Internet Surveillance Programs: United States, Great Britain and Germany 1

Statement on the general concept of the European Union towards Data Protection by Aktion Freiheit statt Angst e.v.; EU Register ID

How To Get A Masters Degree In Intelligence Analysis

Cyber Security Strategy for Germany

News, Events & Publications

South Australia Police POSITION INFORMATION DOCUMENT

Description of Criminal Justice

EDWARD BYRNE MEMORIAL JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT APPLICATION FISCAL YEAR 2015

Cyber threat intelligence and the lessons from law enforcement. kpmg.com.au

Patrick Fair Partner, ITC and Data Security Specialist Baker & McKenzie. Developments in Security Regulation

Federal Bureau of Investigation s Integrity and Compliance Program

Conference Reflective social work practices in contemporary societies: crossed dialogues and new pathways between praxis and research

2 nd Network Conference

TIFFANY R. MURPHY. Assistant Professor of Law Director Criminal Defense Clinic

Vocabulary Builder Activity. netw rks. A. Content Vocabulary. The Bill of Rights

ADELE BERNHARD 78 North Broadway, White Plains, NY (C) (O) EMPLOYMENT

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL. Rebuilding Trust in EU-US Data Flows

Pursuant to section 1.7(i) of Executive Order 12333, as amended, the FBI is authorized to:

9 th SEMINAR OF PROBATION AND SOCIAL WORK IN JUSTICE

Online Ads: A new challenge for privacy? Jörg Polakiewicz*

The IBA Young Lawyers Committee Outstanding Young Lawyer of the Year Award in recognition of William Reece Smith Jr

How To Become A Criminal Justice Professional

From: John Morris, Greg Nojeim & Erica Newland Center for Democracy & Technology. Re: Data Retention Mandate in H.R. 1981

Online Research and Investigation

DATE: 1 APRIL Introduction

LLB (Hons) Law with Criminology Module Information

STATE OF NEVADA Department of Administration Division of Human Resource Management CLASS SPECIFICATION

Context. To cloud or not to cloud, that is a very serious question. Legal challenges in a post Safe Harbour and pre GDPR cloud world

Orientation Program for Students of Our MSc. Programs Business Administration, Economics and MEMS. Information Systems. Prof. Dr.

South Australia Police POSITION INFORMATION DOCUMENT

Hessisches Ministerium der Justiz, für Integration und Europa. Folie # 1

Master of Arts in Criminal Justice

EXAMINATION OUTLINE FOR PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS

L. S O N G R I C H A R D S O N

Luna Community College Criminal Justice Program Associate of Arts Degree

CYBER SECURITY, INTELLIGENCE AND AWARENESS COURSE PARK HOTEL THE HAGUE THE HAGUE, NETHERLANDS 26-30OCTOBER 2015

CLEMSON UNIVERSITY. College Of Business and Behavioral Science Department of Sociology and Anthropology

Legislative Language

CODE OF PRACTICE ON THE MANAGEMENT OF POLICE INFORMATION

How To Study Political Science At Pcj.Edu

Criminal Justice. Course of Study for Associate in Applied Science Degree Criminal Justice.

Liberty University. Bachelor of Science in Criminal Justice

Criminal Justice. Bachelor of Criminal Justice Major in Criminal Justice. Objectives. Degree Offered. Major Offered. Minor Offered

How To Get A Criminal Justice Degree

2399: Miscellaneous Education 401, % 0.3% 2400: General Engineering 735, % 1.2% 2401: Aerospace Engineering 122, % 0.

Department of Political Science and Criminal Justice

THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY CORPORATE PARALEGAL EDUCATION PROGRAM 2010 MAY 20 AND 21, 2010 WASHINGTON, DC

Public-Private Partnerships against cybercrime. Jean-Christophe Le Toquin Director Internet Safety Microsoft EMEA

Stakeholders meeting. Ethical protocols and standards for research in Social Sciences today

LLB (Hons) International Law Module Information

Cyber crime: Police Roles and Responsibilities Within a Collaborative Framework

Policy Brief: Protecting Privacy in Cloud-Based Genomic Research

INVESTIGATE CRIMINAL JUSTICE AT RADFORD UNIVERSITY

Criminal Justice. Bachelor of Criminal Justice Major in Criminal Justice. Objectives. Degree Offered. Major Offered. Minor Offered

Big Data for Public Safety: 4 use cases for intelligence and law enforcement agencies to leverage Big Data for crime prevention.

DEGREE APPLICATION (New or Renewal program)

Making critical connections: predictive analytics in government

Transcription:

Transatlantic Dialogue on Surveillance Methods 18-19 December 2014 Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Günterstalstr. 73, 79100 Freiburg (Germany) Conference Room Fürstenbergstr. 19

Introduction Program Description We are at the earliest stages of what has been termed an era of big data. As digital data increases exponentially, the use and exploitation of this data by the public and private sectors will parallel its availability. Big data methods are predictive in nature. The perceived statistical accuracy of data-driven decision making is transforming how law and security objectives are enforced, how policy is shaped and applied, and how governing structures are trying to adapt to the rapid streams of digital data that has been generated through emerging technologies. The perceived efficacy of patternbased data mining and the purported value of future-forecast governing models increase the pressure on governments to collect, store and retain, and analyze more and more digital data. The Snowden disclosures offer but one example of how big data has transformed traditional intelligence gathering activities. The purpose of the "Transatlantic Dialogue on Surveillance Methods" is to explore the legal, political, ethical, and philosophical implications of emerging data-related technologies and intelligence gathering methods through the lens of comparative law, criminal law and criminology, international human rights law, and constitutional protections and principles. Specifically, this event will invite participants to discuss how technological developments the Internet and information society, big data and supercomputing, automated decision-making and cyber-surveillance, predictive policing and precrime programs, behavioral genetics and neuroscience, artificial intelligence governing systems, etc. might impact the rule of law, fundamental rights, and core constitutional values in the future. We anticipate that conversations generated from this Transatlantic Dialogue may culminate in a book that explores data-related concerns regarding data collection, analysis, security, and privacy. This possibly multi-year project has the support of several organizations, including the Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International (Freiburg, Germany), Washington and Lee University School of Law (Lexington, Virginia/USA), and University of Freiburg [Centre for Security and Society]. As a first step, participants will be invited to convene at the Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International, Freiburg, Germany, from December 18-19, 2014. The Transatlantic Dialogue will focus on the following four areas of discussion: 1. Telecommunication surveillance a view from Europe & North America. 2. Traffic data retention a. After the decision of the European Court of Justice, April 8, 2014; b. And the protection of personal data and privacy balancing security and basic rights; 3. Intelligence services and law enforcement; big data predictive analytics, including pattern-based data mining and data forecasting. 4. What do we know about the results of data mining? Transatlantic Dialogue on Surveillance Methods, Freiburg (Germany), December 18-19, 2014 2

Format of the Dialogue Greetings Introduction of the Participants Panel 1: Panel 2: Panel 3: Panel 4: Traffic Data Retention after the Decision of the European Court of Justice, April 8, 2014 Interception of Telecommunication, Access to Data, and Implications Surveillance Methods and National Security Concerns Surveillance, Constitutionalism, and Comparative Law Approaches Final Discussion Transatlantic Dialogue on Surveillance Methods, Freiburg (Germany), December 18-19, 2014 3

Thursday, 18 December 2014 10:00 Greetings by Hans-Jörg Albrecht, Max Planck Institute (MPI) for Foreign and International, Freiburg Nora Demleitner, Faculty of Law, Washington and Lee University, Lexington, Virginia Chair: Russell Miller, Faculty of Law, Washington and Lee University 10:15 Introduction of the Participants Panel 1: Traffic Data Retention after the Decision of the European Court of Justice, April 8, 2014 10:30-11:15 Data retention in the UK post the European Data Retention Directive: Why blanket surveillance is no security blanket Lucia Zedner, Faculty of Law, University of Oxford, UK 11:15-12:00 Telecommunication Data Retention after the April 2014 Decision of the European Court of Justice Hans-Jörg Albrecht, MPI for Foreign and International 12:00-12:30 Discussion 12:30-14:00 Lunch Break Transatlantic Dialogue on Surveillance Methods, Freiburg (Germany), December 18-19, 2014 4

Chair: Lucia Zedner, Faculty of Law, University of Oxford Panel 2: Interception of Telecommunication, Access to Data, and Implications 14:00-14:30 Interception of Telecommunication and Access to Data - New Paradigms and Legal Challenges Ulrich Sieber, MPI for Foreign and International 14:30-15:00 Digital Innocence Erik Luna, Faculty of Law, Washington and Lee University, co-authored by Joshua Fairfield, Faculty of Law, Washington and Lee University 15:00-15:30 Discussion 15:30-16:00 Coffee Break 16:00-16:30 Technological Supervision and Data Privacy in the Post-Conviction Setting Nora Demleitner, Faculty of Law, Washington and Lee University 16:30-17:00 Privacy versus Crime Control Surveillance in the Telecommunication and Banking Sectors Michael Kilchling, MPI for Foreign and International 17:00-17:30 Discussion 17:45-18:15 Visit of the Library Elisabeth Martin, Head of Library Transatlantic Dialogue on Surveillance Methods, Freiburg (Germany), December 18-19, 2014 5

Friday, 19 December 2014 Chair: Debra Prager, German and Russian Department, Washington and Lee University Panel 3: Surveillance Methods and National Security Concerns 9:00-9:30 Small Data Surveillance v. Big Data Cyber- Surveillance Margaret Hu, Faculty of Law, Washington and Lee University 9:30-10:00 Heretic Realism on Mass Surveillance Martin Hochhuth, Faculty of Law, University of Freiburg 10:00-10:30 Discussion 10:30-11:00 Coffee Break 11:00-11:30 Investigating the Crimes of the National Socialist Underground a Case for Structural Reforms of the Secret Services Involvement in Criminal Proceedings? Marc Engelhart, MPI for Foreign and International 11:30-12:00 German Exceptionalism? Constitutional, legal and policy questions regarding the BND & mass surveillance Stefan Heumann, stiftung neue verantwortung, Berlin 12:00-12:30 Discussion 12:30-14:00 Lunch Break Transatlantic Dialogue on Surveillance Methods, Freiburg (Germany), December 18-19, 2014 6

Friday, 19 December 2014 (cont.) Chair: Emily Silverman, Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Panel 4: Surveillance, Constitutionalism, and Comparative Law Approaches 14:00-14:30 Privacy by Another Name? Deciphering the Differences in the German and American Struggle to Balance Liberty and Security Russell Miller, Faculty of Law, Washington and Lee University 14:30-15:00 The Right to Informational Self-Determination: A No- Right-Thesis Ralf Poscher, University of Freiburg Faculty of Law 15:00-15:30 Discussion 15:30-16:00 Coffee Break 16:00-16:30 Privacy as a Public Good Joshua Fairfield, Faculty of Law, Washington and Lee University, co-authored by Christoph Engel, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn 16:30-17:00 Big Data Blacklisting Margaret Hu, Faculty of Law, Washington and Lee University Chairs: Nora Demleitner, Faculty of Law, Washington and Lee University and Hans-Jörg Albrecht, MPI for Foreign and International 17:00-17:30 Final Discussion Transatlantic Dialogue on Surveillance Methods, Freiburg (Germany), December 18-19, 2014 7