REPORT TO THE BOARD OF EDUCATION JUNE



Similar documents
Principal Practice Observation Tool

Curriculum Management

Educational Leadership Program Standards. ELCC Revised Standards

Hiawatha Academies School District #4170

Dimensions and Functions for School Leaders

Field Experience and Student Teaching Competencies

Instructional Technology Initiative Task Force: Vision, Mission, & Core Values

Exhibit B: Superintendent Performance Evaluation Form

Holland Elementary School Local Stakeholder Group Recommendations to the Commissioner Submitted January 6, 2014

Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems

Generation Next Leadership Council SPECIAL SESSION

Instructional Management Plan

DRAFT. Denver Plan Every Child Succeeds

Multi-Year Communications Plan

Self Assessment. Orange County Public Schools. Dr. Barbara Jenkins, Superintendent 445 W Amelia St Orlando, FL

Agenda for Reform. Summary Briefing December 14, 2009

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Counselors

Strategic Planning: The School Counselor s Tool for Accountability

South Washington County Schools World s Best Workforce Summary Report

Adopted March 2010 ESEA REAUTHORIZATION PRINCIPLES AND RECOMMENDATIONS. A Policy Statement of the Council of Chief State School Officers

What is Quality Schools Development? Why are we doing this?

If students are to succeed

Collier County Public Schools Superintendent s Self Evaluation Aligned to Strategic Plan Performance Indicators

To expand teachers use of a variety of resources to improve instruction

GUIDELINES RECOMMENDED FOR USE WITH RULE 24 (ENDORSEMENTS)

Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness System. Principal Evaluation Process Manual

Cyber School Student Teaching Competencies

2015 SDA Teacher Application

WORLD S BEST WORKFORCE PLAN

Wythe County Public Schools Comprehensive Plan

Regina M. Dawson 601 Blandville Road, Lexington, KY (859)

Planning: Planning Team: Technical Assistance

Brentwood Borough School District Continuous Improvement Plan

Principles to Actions

Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s Instructional Technology Facilitators

Report of the Quality Assurance Review Team for Big A Elementary School Route 2, Box 384 Sorrells Road Eastanollee, Georgia United States

Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools Office of Innovation

Domain 1: Strategic/Cultural Leadership

A Guide to Implementing Principal Performance Evaluation in Illinois

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Key Principles for ELL Instruction (v6)

Gwinnett County Public Schools, Ga.

Summary of the Assessment Plan for the Educational Leadership and Administration Program

Essential Principles of Effective Evaluation

ERIC GORDON 1830 West 28 th Street, Apartment 9 Cleveland, Ohio Eric_S_Gordon@yahoo.com EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Committee On Public Secondary Schools. Standards for Accreditation

Strategic Plan Every Student: College and Career Ready. Strong Students Strong Schools Strong Staff Strong System

Assessing the Success of Specific GEAR UP Components:

MASTER SCHEDULE GUIDING PRINCIPLES, PRIORITIES, MILESTONES & METRICS

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Social Workers

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR THE ISSUANCE OF CONTINUING EDUCATION UNITS REQUIRED FOR CERTIFICATION

Our 3 Priorities. Raise student achievement, particularly in reading & math. Close achievement gaps for students of color and special education

Teacher and Leader Evaluation Requirements An Overview

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Social Workers

Wallingford Public Schools Strategic Planning Chart School Name: Adult Education

MASTER OF SCIENCE IN EDUCATION AND CERTIFICATION OPTIONS

Curriculum and Instruction: A 21st Century Skills Implementation Guide

A Guide for Professional Development/Transition Planning for Implementation of the College- and Career-Ready Standards

Classified Performance Management. Advisory Committee Meeting May 23, 2011

Trenton Public Schools Academic Plan

San Francisco Unified School District San Francisco County Office of Education Master Plan for Educational Technology DRAFT May 22, 2012

How To Improve Education Planning In Dekalb County Schools

Arkansas Teaching Standards

Certificates and Transfer Programs

SREB State College and Career Readiness Initiative

North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards

EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM Recognition. Standards:

Pennsylvania Department of Education

2013 Marzano School Leader Evaluation Model Rubric

Orange County Small Learning Communities Site Implementation Checklist

Delaware Performance Appraisal System

S.T.E.M. Education. Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Presented by: Dr. Kelly Murray

Framework for Leadership

Instructional Technology Standards Proposed by the GaPSC Instructional Technology Task Force December 2010

Chapter 6: Hiring and placing coaches

Model for Practitioner Evaluation Manual SCHOOL COUNSELOR. Approved by Board of Education August 28, 2002

Illinois Center for School Improvement Framework: Core Functions, Indicators, and Key Questions

MARZANO SCHOOL LEADERSHIP EVALUATION MODEL

Quick Reference Guide Ohio Standards for Professional Development

The 20 Non-Negotiable Characteristics of Higher Performing School Systems

Quality Review Record Book

Tulsa Public Schools District School Counseling Program Elementary

FRAMEWORK OF SUPPORT: SCHOOL-LEVEL PRACTICE PROFILE

Office of the Superintendent of Schools MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Rockville, Maryland. May 30, 2013

ACS WASC Accreditation Status Determination Worksheet

Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Psychologists Definition of an Effective School Psychologist

Bethel Park School District. Bethel Park Online Academy Handbook

Utah Educational Leadership Standards, Performance Expectations and Indicators

PRINCIPAL POSITION DESCRIPTION

Sustaining the Race to the Top Reforms

Bridging Theory and Practice: Lessons from Clinical Teacher Education programs in the U.S. Jesse Solomon Executive Director BPE

Lillian Tsosie-Jensen School Counseling, Equity, and Prevention Coordinator

3. Why did the Department decide to require the statewide use of core instructional materials?

Section Three: Ohio Standards for Principals

Transcription:

Curriculum and Instructional Program Review 1 REPORT TO THE BOARD OF EDUCATION JUNE 2, 2015 Donna Micheaux, Ph.D. Denise Collier, Ed.D. Purpose and Context PPS Vision 2 All students graduating high school Promise-Ready and completing a twoor four-year college degree or workforce certification Contexts for improving teaching and learning systems and supports: 1. Pennsylvania common core standards 2. PSSA (Pennsylvania System of School Assessment) and Keystone assessments 3. Current levels of student achievement (gaps and disparities) 4. College readiness vision 5. Feedback on current curricular systems 1

Theory of Action 3 Integrated components of the overall teaching and learning system Organizational Transformation Standards Curriculum Work together as a coherent whole, not as separate parts that can be taken individually or prioritized one over the other Professional Learning Student Achievement Intervention/Use of Data Assessment Culture of High Expectations and High Supports Instruction Review Process 4 Phase One: Curriculum Document/Data Review and Central Office Interviews and Focus Groups December 2014 and January 2015 Phase Two: Staff Survey, School Site Visits, Teacher and Principal Interviews February and March 2015 Phase Three: Findings and Recommendations Update to Superintendent - April 2015 Presentation to Board of Education - June 2015 2

Central Administration 5 Superintendent Deputy Superintendent Chief Officers Assistant Superintendents Executive Directors Program Directors Content Area Supervisors Other Collaborations/Reviewers (Children s Innovation Project, Assessment) Interviews Groups Meetings Professional Development Sessions Data Review Curriculum Review Program Information External Report Review School Site Visits 6 1. Allegheny K-5 2. Banksville K-5 3. Concord K-5 4. Lincoln Pre-K - 5 5. Langley K-8 6. Arsenal 6-8 7. Allderdice High School 8. Pittsburgh Science and Technology Academy 9. Westinghouse 6-12 Principals Teachers Asst. Principals Instructional Support Staff Interviews Classroom Visits Teacher Focus Group Session 3

Curriculum and Instructional Program Improvement Review Questions 1. To what extent are the current systems defined, designed, enacted and supported to maximize rigorous learning opportunities for all students? 7 Organizational Transformation Professional Learning Standards Student Achievement Curriculum Instruction 1. How might these systems be improved? Intervention/Use of Data Assessment Culture of High Expectations and High Supports Promising Practices Curriculum and Central Leadership 8 Standards alignment and clarification curriculum efforts Sincere desire to serve students, teachers, and principals Shift from oversight (scripted curriculum) to support Focus on principal and teacher capacity building Draft of a theory of action for teaching and learning Teaching and Learning Advisory Committee 4

Allegheny Elementary Innovation and Engagement Promising Practices School Site Visits 9 Banksville Elementary School-wide Culture of High Expectations, Support, and Equity Promising Practices School Site Visits 10 Concord Elementary Whole Child Focus Lincoln Elementary Science and Technology Langley K-8 School-wide Protocol for Studying Data Know your data Organize your data Use your data to support instruction Review your data with students to help them improve Display your data 5

Promising Practices School Site Visits Arsenal Middle School Common Core School-Based Professional Development 11 Allderdice College and Career Readiness Promising Practices School Site Visits 12 Westinghouse 6-12 Professional Learning Community Science and Technology Academy College-Going Culture 6

Review Question #1 13 To what extent are the current systems defined, designed, enacted and supported to maximize rigorous learning opportunities for all students? Organizational Transformation Professional Learning Standards Student Achievement Intervention/Use of Data Assessment Culture of High Expectations and High Supports Curriculum Instruction Overarching Findings Curriculum Direction and Theory of Action 14 Curriculum Systems Design and Access Curriculum Support to Schools Program-Specific Findings Over-Reliance on Standardized Testing 7

Review Question #2 15 With these findings in mind Organizational Transformation Standards Curriculum How might the teaching and learning systems be improved? Professional Learning Student Achievement Intervention/Use of Data Assessment Instruction Culture of High Expectations and High Supports Recommendations 16 1. Establish a clear, coherent theory of action for teaching and learning direction and focus. 2. Improve coherence and quality of curriculum tools, and develop a long-term curriculum management plan and development timeline. 3. As curricular tools and programs are refined, central support staff should shift focus of curriculum and instruction leadership efforts from development to supporting classroom enactment of the curriculum across schools. 8

Recommendations 17 4. Strengthen and accelerate efforts to improve the cultural relevance and responsiveness of curriculum, and support teachers in using responsive pedagogical practices. 5. Focus efforts to improve curriculum and instructional supports for English learners and students with disabilities. Recommendations 6. Develop systems of shared accountability for learning and tiered supports to schools. 18 7. Examine curriculum-based assessments for rigor, scope, and quality. (Implement recommendations listed of the assessment review report.) 8. Examine the quality of literacy and math intervention programs and the effectiveness of intervention implementation for their impact on learning. 9

Recommendations 19 9. Focus professional development efforts on principal and teacher capacity building as part of the shift to shared accountability for learning, especially as related to new standards and assessments. 10. Develop an integrated data and information system leveraging the power of digital technologies for teaching and learning systems information management. Strategy 20 Curriculum and instructional program improvement as a twoprong strategy: Improving the common cause overall program (long-term) Addressing immediate special cause needs (short-term) 10

District Response Curriculum Advisory Council Theory of Action for teaching and learning Long-range plan (focus, core tools, rigor, coherence, quality) Shift focus from design to implementation support Academic foci (early literacy, algebra, biology) 21 Role of the assistant superintendent Build principal and teacher capacity Ensure implementation of curriculum Feedback loops curriculum design and school implementation People: Growing our own Structure: K-12 Vertical Articulation Culture: Leading and Learning Together Teaching and Learning in Pittsburgh Public Schools DIALOGUE 22 Standards Organizational Transformation Curriculum Professional Learning Instruction Intervention/Use of Data Assessment Dr. Donna Micheaux Culture of High Expectations and High Supports Dr. Denise Collier 11