Public Diplomacy Assessment: ECA Program Evaluation and Performance Measurement

Similar documents
5 FAM 670 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) PERFORMANCE MEASURES FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT

TEACHERS FOR GLOBAL CLASSROOMS PROGRAM APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE. SUBJECT: Assistant Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs (ASD(PA))

DISCIPLINE REVIEWER INSTRUCTIONS AND POLICY APPLICATIONS

ClOP CHAPTER Departmental Information Technology Governance Policy TABLE OF CONTENTS. Section 39.1

U.S. Department of the Treasury. Treasury IT Performance Measures Guide

M ANAGEMENT I NTEGRATION G OAL. Achieve organizational and management excellence

EVALUATION OF ECA S ENGLISH LANGUAGE PROGRAMS: English Language Specialist Program Key Findings

Terms of Reference for Assessment of the Environment & Natural Resources Sector in Kenya

ADVERTISEMENT. Project Coordinator, Ending Violence Against Women / EVAW (SOI covering Vanuatu) (SC SB-4)

Executive Office of the President. Office of Management and Budget. Fiscal Year 2015 Budget

How To Use The Eca-Pios System

MARKET VALUE GS-13 ($73,846 - $95,998)

E-COMMERCE TECHNOLOGY Plan for Assessment of Student Academic Achievement

Center for Latin American Studies Strategic Plan

QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM FOR THE EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES AT THE UNIVERSITY OF TROMSØ

Student and Academic Support Services Assessment Information Packet

INTERNATIONAL UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT PROGRAMS U.S. ACADEMIC HOST INSTITUTION APPLICATION PROGRAM OVERVIEW

chieving organizational and management excellence

Understanding and Influencing The Legislative Process

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a RECOMMENDATION OF THE COUNCIL AND OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

KPI UN Women Response Key Actions I. UN-Women s organisational effectiveness KPI 1: Providing direction for results

Before we get started

PROJECT OBJECTIVES, GOALS, AND IMPLEMENTATION (POGI)

CLASS SPECIFICATION Human Resources Director. Nonrepresented/All Bureau Directors hired after December 31, 2000 are exempt from Civil Service

1 FAM 230 BUREAU OF HUMAN RESOURCES (HR)

MEMORANDUM FOR AGENCY HEADS. Improving Employee Engagement and Performance

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Evaluation of the English Access Microscholarship Program. Executive Summary. December Prepared for:

WHEREAS, Richard Lobo announced his resignation as Director of the International Broadcasting Bureau (IBB), effective November 30, 2013; and

AACSB Standards. from the Eligibility Procedures and Accreditation Standards for Business Accreditation Handbook, revised January 31, 2010

The Communication for Governance & Accountability Program

The creation of EIPA in 1981 coincided almost exactly with the launch of

Project Manager Job Descriptions

Professional Education Unit

A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT THE OMB HELP DESK

GRADUATE EDUCATION AT USM: A STATEMENT OF THE GRADUATE COUNCIL March 2, 2009

IPP Learning Outcomes Report

Higher Education: Quality, Quality Assurance, the Concept and its Elements and HERQA s Focus Areas

USAID Management Operations Council Charter

USAID PROGRAM CYCLE OVERVIEW

COALITION FOR INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION

Peace operations 2010 reform strategy (excerpts from the report of the Secretary-General)

Learning Outcomes Data for the Senate Committee on Instructional Program Priorities. MS Nursing (with RN license) Master s of Science in Nursing (MSN)

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT MANUAL TRANSMITTAL SHEET

} Placement Agents Some Background } Placement Agent Fundraising Process } Placements Agents versus Finders } Other Considerations } Appendix Thomas

INTERNAL AUDIT MANUAL

2013 Review of the MS in Sport Management

The Behavioral Insights Group: Policy Analysis Exercise Clients

Innovative State Practices for Improving The Provision of Medicaid Dental Services:

City of Portland Job Code: CLASS SPECIFICATION Senior Labor Relations Analyst

Table of Contents PERFORMANCE REVIEWS STRATEGIC REVIEWS

FOUNDATION FOR CHILD DEVELOPMENT Young Scholars Program 2016 Guidelines

SENATE. Senate Bill No. 1 B? 4 INTRODUCED BY SEN. JINGGOY EJERCITO ESTRADA EXPLANATORY NOTE

TITLE VI OF THE HIGHER EDUCATION ACT Part B-BUSINESS AND INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS

State Plan for the State Vocational Rehabilitation Services Program and State Plan Supplement for the State Supported Employment Services Program

Study on Benefits of Whole-day Primary Schooling

The Importance of Public Health Practice For universities

National Standards. Council for Standards in Human Service Education (2010, 1980, 2005, 2009)

MARKETING MANAGEMENT I. Course outline

Program Management Professional. PgMP

Subject: National Preparedness

GUIDELINES FOR FORENSIC LABORATORY MANAGEMENT PRACTICES INTRODUCTION

December 8, 2009 MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES

HUMAN AND INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT HANDBOOK A USAID MODEL FOR SUSTAINABLE PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT

Symbiosis Institute of Business Management (SIBM) - Pune. Research Conference on Innovative Business Strategies. Research Paper on

In total, Massachusetts overstated its Medicaid claim for reimbursement by $5,312,447 (Federal share).

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION 2015 STATE PLAN. October 1, 2014 September 30, 2015

NOT ALL COMMUNITY SERVICES BLOCK GRANT RECOVERY ACT COSTS CLAIMED

Monitoring and Evaluation Plan Primer for DRL Grantees

Sound Transit Internal Audit Report - No

HLS450: Intelligence. Course Description and Outcomes. Credit Hours: 3

STUDY OF ECA S SPORTSUNITED PROGRAMS:

LUKHANJI MUNICIPALITY PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK

1. Background and Overview Why the addendum? How should this addendum be used? Organization of the addendum 2

UNITED STATES COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

EVALUATION OF ECA S PROFESSIONAL JOURNALISM AND MEDIA EXCHANGE PROGRAMS:

Transcription:

Public Diplomacy Assessment: ECA Program Evaluation and Performance Measurement Evaluation Division April 2010 Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Office of Policy and Evaluation U.S. Department of State

Session Overview Introduction to the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs ECA Evaluation Division: Program Outcome Evaluation ECA Evaluation Division: Performance Measurement Initiative 2

ECA Bureau Overview Through its Fulbright-Hayes Act Mandate, ECA administers a range of exchange programs to promote mutual understanding and linkages between citizens and institutions in the US and overseas Integral Part of Public Diplomacy 3

ECA Exchange Program Portfolio Range of educational, cultural, and professional programs 90+ programs Range of program activities Programs across many sectors and disciplines Participants vary 4

Why Conduct Evaluations and Performance Measurement at ECA? Ensures programs are effective in achieving State Department, ECA, and program goals Accountability: ECA meets Congressional, OMB, other mandates for evaluation, PM, and results reporting Actionable: ECA Division provides data for use by program managers and grantees Contributes to body of knowledge for practitioners and scholars across sectors 5

Evaluation Division: Purview 10+ Years The Evaluation Division is responsible for designing and implementing outcome evaluations of ECA's educational and cultural exchange programs Fifty-four evaluations and reports have either been completed or are on-going The Evaluation Division collects and analyzes ECA performance measurement data from program exchange participants Number of programs and exchanges assessed: 90+ Measuring progress towards Bureau outcomes: changes in learning, behavior, actions and institutions. 6

Outcome Evaluations Systematic objective assessments of ECA exchange program Effectiveness in achieving State, Bureau and Program goals Sustainability mechanisms Program Design, Changes 7

Outcome Evaluation Designs Unique programs Crossing-cutting, thematic, or sectoral Retrospective several years after program initiation Multi-year, multi-country evaluations Mixed methods- qual. and quant. data Document Review, Surveys, Fieldwork Conducted by independent evaluation firms 8

Outcome Evaluations: Bureau and Program Goals Assessed Mutual Understanding Linkages (btwn citizens, institutions, countries) Attitudinal Changes 9

More Bureau and Program Goals Assessed Knowledge and Skill Development Professional Development Application of New Learning Sharing/ Communicating new learning/networking Communities and Community Service Organizational and Institutional Development 10

Performance Measurement Initiative Decision to undertake comprehensive ECA Bureau performance measurement Process Developing Bureau Outcomes Developing indicators for each outcome Collecting and aggregating indicator data 11

Performance Measurement Initiative Performance measurement surveys gather data on ECA Bureau Outcome Indicators and program performance data at three points in time: Pre- program surveys collect data from program participants @ program start Post- program surveys collect indicator data and performance data @ end of program Follow-up surveys collect indicator data and performance data o/a 1 year after program completion 12

Evaluation Division Performance Measurement Data Collection Tool E- GOALS, the Bureau's online performance measurement system: Delivers surveys links to participants Surveys contain questions that pertain to indicator and indicator data. System aggregates all Indicator performance data. Number of surveys launched: 560 Number of respondents to surveys: 27,762 13

Bureau Outcomes and Indicators Outcome 1:Participants are satisfied with the exchange experience. Indicator 1: % of participants who express satisfaction with the exchange experience based on an average of several program factors. Outcome 2:Increased understanding of U.S. institutions, fundamental norms, and values. Indicator 2: % of participants who improved their understanding of political and economic processes, norms, and values. Outcome 3: Increased trust of U.S. government. Indicator 3: % of participants who agree that the U.S. government is a trustworthy partner for their country. 14

Bureau Outcomes and Indicators Outcome 4: More favorable views of the U.S. government and the American people. Indicator 4a: % of participants who report more favorable views of the U.S. government Indicator 4b: % of participants who report more favorable views of the American people. Outcome 5: Increased participation and/or responsibility (leadership role) in work, community, or civil society. Indicator 5: % of participants who increase their participation or level of responsibility. 15

Bureau Outcomes and Indicators Outcome 6:Concrete actions taken to apply knowledge gained in institutions, community groups, government, or civil society organizations. Indicator 6: % of participants who initiate or implement a positive change in their organization or community Outcome 7: Participants explain or interpret their experience for others. Indicator 7: % of participants who explain or share their (new) knowledge and exchange program experiences. 16

Bureau Outcomes and Indicators Outcome 8: Increased collaboration and linkages. ( Institutional collaboration includes building coalitions, formal networks, federations, exchanges, and joint ventures.) Indicator 8a: % of participants with continued personal contacts (contacts made during the program experience). Indicator 8b: % of participants who establish or continue professional collaborations. Indicator 8c: % of participants who establish or continue formal, sustainable institutional relationships (relationships would continue if participants left institutions). 17

ECA Evaluation and Performance Measurement Data Reporting Formal (as official performance assessments and reports, planning processes, testimony, budget justification): State Department Under/Secretary for Public Diplomacy & Public Affairs Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs OMB Congress Dissemination to other USG agencies, Media, Grantees, Professionals, Academics, Scholars, Students, Alumni 18

Evaluation Division Websites ECA Bureau: http://exchanges.state.gov/ ECA, Office of Policy and Evaluation/Evaluation Division http://exchanges.state.gov/programevaluations/programevaluations.html 19

For more information contact ECAEvaluation@state.gov 20