Çankaya Üniversitesi FenEdebiyat Fakültesi, Journal of Arts and Sciences Say : 4 / Aral k 5 Leaching of Asphaltite Ash With H 2 SO 4 and Extraction of,, in Solution Ifl l AYDIN, Recep Z YADANO LLARI * Abstract The aim of this study is to investigate the reaction of,, and Ni while taking in to solution and recovering these elements from solution. The quantities of the above elements in solution were in 58 ppm. In the first stage, effect of parameters such as the ratio of ash/ H 2 SO 4, temperature and time was investigated on the pressure leaching of the above elements. The best pressure leaching for 1 g asphaltite ash samples was achieved by 9 ml of 15 M H 2 SO 4 for 1 min at 225 C in an autoclave. The yields of leaching were 99.5 %, 1. %, 1. %, 1. % Ti and 99.9 % Ni. In the second stage, the pregnant solution was extracted with Alamine 336 to recover,,, and also the effect of oxidants such as air, KMnO 4, H 2 O 2 and MnO 2 were investigated. The best result was obtained with air. Extraction yields are 98 %, 89 % and 93 %. For stripping 75 g/l Na 2 CO 3 solution was used. Keywords: Asphaltite ash; molybdenum; uranium; vanadium; nickel; extraction Özet Bu çal flman n amac,,, un çözeltiye al n rken reaksiyonlar n incelemek ve çözeltiden bu elementlerin kazan lmas n sa lamakt r. Bu elementlerin çözeltideki miktarlar 58 ppm dir. lk aflamada, bu elementlerin bas nç alt nda özütlemesinde kül/ H 2 SO 4 oran, s cakl k ve zaman parametrelerinin etkisi araflt r lm flt r. En iyi özütleme, 1 g asfaltit kül örneklerinin 9 ml, 15 M H 2 SO 4 ile 1 dk ve 225 C de otoklav ortam nda baflar lm flt r. Özütleme verimleri,s ras yla, %99,5, %1, %1, %1 Ti ve %99,9 Ni dir. 2.aflamada, bu çözelti Alamine 336 ile ekstrakte edilerek,, un organik faza al nmas sa land ve ayr ca hava, KMnO 4, H 2 O 2 ve MnO 2 gibi yükseltgenlerin etkisi araflt r ld. En iyi sonuç, hava ile elde edildi. Ekstraksiyon verimleri, %98, %89 ve %93 olarak belirlendi. S y rma iflleminde, 75 g/l Na 2 CO 3 çözeltisi kullan ld. Anahtar Kelimeler: Asfaltit Külü, libden, ranyum, anadyum, Ekstraksiyon * Dicle niversity, Science and Arts Faculty, Chemistry Department, 2118 Diyarbakir, Turkey 143
Leaching of Asphaltite Ash With H2SO4 and extraction of,, in Solution Introduction The investigation studies carried out to recover,,, Ni and Ti from the ashes of Silopi (Turkey) asphaltites have earlier been reported. Mainly, various leaching investigations from solid were carried out, and of these, a leaching method was obtained and then applied to the solutions under optimal conditions. Dilute H 2 SO 4 was used for leaching, and leaching efficiency is about 9 % of,,, and 6 % of Ni. The ratio of H 2 SO 4 to ash is 2:1. If leaching is carried out by 14 15 M H 2 SO 4 in atmospheric conditions, about 9 % of, and Ni passes into solution. The consumption of H 2 SO 4 is the same (1,2). Later, the solvent extraction method was carried out on these solutions. The extraction of, and from aqueous solutions by using Alamine 336 (trinoctylamine) in kerosene was reported in earlier studies (3). It has been shown that amines are potentially economical good extractant for some metals. st of the studies in this field have been carried out to investigate the extraction mechanism and interaction of amines with aqueous phase (47). Furthermore, the purpose of various studies of extraction of uranium (I) is to explore industrial conditions for uranium extraction at ppm level concentration. The extraction of molybdenium, vanadium and uranium by amines, organophosphorus extractants and sulphoxides has also been reported (814). The originality of this study is that we investigated the reactions that occurred during taking,,, Ni and Ti from asphaltite ash into solution according to the oxidant used in the extraction conditions in order to improve the yield. Experimental Procedure Composition of the studied elements in the sample is,.33,.6,.45 Ni,.44 Ti, 9.47 Al, 2.96 Fe and.5 % 3 O 8. Reagents and Apparatus All chemicals used were of analytical reagent grade: Kerosene (Merck), nnonanol (Fluka), Alamine 336 (Merck), H 2 SO 4 (Merck). The mixture of Alamine 336, nnonanol and Kerosene (1:1:8) was used for the extraction. nnonanol was added to Alamine solution to prevent the formation of the third phase. 144
Ifl l AYDIN Recep Z YADANO LLARI The analyses of,,, Ni and Ti were carried out by JobinYvon JY 24 model ICPAES (Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrophotometry). Extraction percentages were determined by comparison of the amounts of these elements present in aqueous solution before and after extraction treatments. The ph measurement was also performed with a Nel ph 89 model ph meter. Taking of,,, Ni and Ti into solution The first step of the works that have been done on recovery of,,, Ni and Ti from Silopi asphaltite is the reaction of ash with H 2 SO 4. The ash and sulphuric acid were reacted at 175,, 225, 25, 275 and 3 C for different values of ash and H 2 SO 4 (with solutions of H 2 SO 4 13, 14 and 15 M). The experiment was conducted for 1 min in an autoclave. Experimental conditions and results are given in Figs 1 & 2. 1 1 8 8 R, % 6 4 6 4 15 25 3 35 15 25 35 T T 1 1 8 8 6 4 Ni 6 4 Ti 15 25 35 15 25 35 T T Fig. 1: Effect of temperature on the pressure leaching of,, Ni and Ti, respectively * ( at 15 M H 2 SO 4 ) T: Temperature, R: Taking into solution, M: larity * : Averages calculated for data obtained from three independent leaching experiments 145
Leaching of Asphaltite Ash With H2SO4 and extraction of,, in Solution 1 1 8 6 4 12 13 14 15 16 1 8 6 4 12 13 14 15 16 M M 1 8 6 4 Ni 1 8 6 4 Ti 12 13 14 15 16 12 13 14 15 16 M M Fig. 2: Effect of concentration of H 2 SO 4 on the pressure leaching of,, Ni and Ti, respectively* ( at 225 C) T: Temperature, R: Taking into solution, M: larity * : Averages calculated for data obtained from three independent leaching experiments nder the same conditions, all of ranium was leached into solution. All of these studies were carried out to take,,, Ni and Ti into solution medium. As it can be seen from the figures, the best results were obtained by the reaction between 9 ml of 15 M H 2 SO 4 with 1 g of ash at 225 C. Separation of metal ions by liquidliquid extraction After taking these elements to solution, the liquidliquid extraction method was applied to samples. A series of experiments were carried out with Alamine 336. Twostep extaction method was used. The aqueous solution used in extraction works was prepared by the roasting of the ash of Silopi asphaltites with 15 M H 2 SO 4 for 1 min at 225 C. Extraction treatments were carried out in a glass apparatus of 1 ml volume. All tests were performed at constant temperature (25 C), time (5 minute) and stirring speed (15 rpm). In addition, a certain amount of nnonanol was added to both of the above solutions so that they could be 1% in solution to prevent the third phase. Fifteen ml of aqueous phase, which contained a certain amount of,,, Ni and Ti, was shaken with 15 ml of organic phase. Furthermore, for stripping 75 g/l Na 2 CO 3 solution was used. 146
Ifl l AYDIN Recep Z YADANO LLARI Organic Solution Aqueous phase Extraction ( two stage ) Aqueous phase Analysis,, ph Measurements Organic Phase Analysis,, ph Measurements Na2CO3 Aqueous phase Organic Phase Analysis,, Fig. 3: The flow sheet of the separation process. All of the elements present in solution were extracted by Alamine 336 with kerosene. Also, as an oxidant.1 M KMnO 4 was added into solution, and air was passed through it. The same procedure was repeated by using MnO 2 instead of KMnO 4. Two step extractions were applied to this solution. Results are given in Table 11 and Table 12. Results and Discussion This study was carried out to recover,,, Ni and Ti from Silopi asphaltite by reacting ash with H 2 SO 4. The parameters such as the ratio of ash/h 2 SO 4, temperature and time were investigated. The best leaching for asphaltite ash was determined by using 15 M H 2 SO 4 for 1 min at 225 C for 1 g sample in autoclave. From the sample, which was reacted with 15 M H 2 SO 4 at 225 C during 1 minutes, 99.5 %, 1. %, 1. %, 1. 147
Leaching of Asphaltite Ash With H2SO4 and extraction of,, in Solution % Ti and 99.96 % Ni were taken into solution. This result is obtained when solid/h 2 SO 4 ratio is 1g/.9 ml. The reactions that occur as a result of reaction of ash with H 2 SO 4 in autoclave medium are as follows (1). H 2 SO 4 SO 2 + 1/2O 2 + H 2 O 2O 3 + 3SO 2 + 6H + 2 3+ + 3SO 3 + 3H 2 O (3H 2 SO 4 ) or 2CaO 4 + 5SO 2 + O 2 2CaSO 4 + 2 3+ + 3SO 4 2 2 O 5 + 2SO 2 + 6H + 2 3+ + 2SO 3 + 3H 2 O (2H 2 SO 4 +H 2 O) or Ca(O 3 ) 2 + 4SO 2 + O 2 CaSO 4 + 2 3+ + 3SO 4 2 The following reactions were considered if nickel in ash was present as NiO 2, Ni 2 O 3 and NiFe 2 O 4 respectively. NiFe 2 O 4 respectively. NiO 2 + SO 2 NiSO 4 Ni 2 O 3 + 2SO 2 + 1/2O 2 2NiSO 4 Nickel and iron are probably present in the asphaltite ash as NiFe 2 O 4 (NiO.Fe 2 O 3 ) inverse spinel structure. Therefore, it is thought that the following reaction may occur. NiFe 2 O 4 + 3SO 2 + O 2 NiSO 4 + FeSO 4 TiO 2 + H 2 SO 4 TiOSO 4 + H 2 O Due to lack of efficiency of dissolution, about 112 % of these elements were not dissolved. This result is obtained when solid/h 2 SO 4 ratio is 1/2. 148
Ifl l AYDIN Recep Z YADANO LLARI By using mixture of ash and H 2 SO 4 in autoclave medium, the following results were observed for,,, Ni and Ti, which passed into solution. (i) All of and passed into solution as +3 and +3 respectively. (ii) All of passed into solution as +4. (iii) All of Ni passed into solution as Ni +2. (iv) All of Ti passed into solution as TiO +2. (v) After an effective dissolution procedure, all of,, and Ni were taken into solution. Also, the differences that occurred in extraction work emerged as a result of this structural change. A solvent extraction procedure is given below : M x O n y (aq) : Metal ion in aqueous solution R 3 N + H 2 SO 4 (R 3 NH + ) HSO 4 n(r 3 NH + )HSO 4 + M x O y n (R 3 NH + ) n M x O y n + nhso 4 ( R:C 8 H 17 for Alamine 336 ) It was observed that and did not pass into organic phase by direct extraction with Alamine 336. This shows that molybdenium and vanadium passed into aqueous solution due to lower oxidation state in leaching process. Extraction process was progressed by adding oxidants such as Air, KMnO 4, H 2 O 2 and MnO 2. Extraction processes were carried out at 25, 4, 5, 6 C temperature, and ph values were 1.17, 1.25, 1.7 respectively. Table 1: The results of two Stage extraction and s with 1% Alamine336 at 25 C * 64.94 83.8 8.29 1 st extraction 2 nd extraction 1 st stripping 2 nd stripping remove to organic remove to organic remove to liquid remove to liquid phase phase phase phase 1.35 4.11 4.42 6.25 96.6 96. 4.82 1.13 94.6 Table Table 2: The 2 The results results of two of two Stage Stage extraction and and s with 1 % Alamine336 at 4 C C ** 64.94 83.8 8.29 1 st extraction 2 nd extraction 1 st stripping 2 nd stripping remove to organic remove to organic remove to liquid remove to liquid phase phase phase phase 1.6 9.19 98.82 5.19 6.8 98.1 13.8 14.95 97.3 96.8 149
Leaching of Asphaltite Ash With H2SO4 and extraction of,, in Solution Table 3: The results of two Stage extraction and s with 1% Alamine 336 at 5 C * 64.94 83.8 8.29 1 st extraction 2 nd extraction 1 st stripping 2 nd stripping remove to organic remove to organic remove to liquid remove to liquid phase phase phase phase 22.36 26.84 99.8 98.6 26.24 28.17 9.4 95.76 26.5 25. 99. 95.6 Table Table 4: The 4 results The results of two of two Stage Stage extraction and and s with 1 1 % Alamine 336 at 6 C C * 1 st extraction 2 nd extraction 1 st stripping 2 nd stripping remove to organic remove to organic remove to liquid remove to liquid phase phase phase phase 4.8 6.93 97.7 91.56 4.86 5.94 94.9 98.6 14. 14.1 92.3 96.56 Table 5: The results of two Stage extraction and s with 1 % Alamine 336 at 7 * 64.94 83.8 8.29 1 st extraction 2 nd extraction 1 st stripping 2 nd stripping remove to organic remove to organic remove to liquid remove to liquid phase phase phase phase 1.6 1.26 1.96 96.3 8.8 98.2 Table 6: The results of two Stage extraction and s from aqueous solution (ph=1.17) using Alamine 336 in air medium with different time at 5 C * 64.94 83.8 8.29 1 min air min air 3 min air 4 min air 5 min air 6 min air remove to organic phase remove to organic phase remove to organic phase remove to organic phase remove to organic phase remove to organic phase 1 st ext 2 nd ext 1 st ext 2 nd ext 1 st ext 2 nd ext 1 st ext 2 nd ext 1 st ext 2 nd ext 1 st ext 2 nd ext 76.36 75.44 56.83 53.48 73.21 7.49 73.85 7.42 56.98 64.13 71.13 68.27 71.11 82.13 56.2 69.71 71.28 8.49 7.16 74.33 55.29 68.79 7.54 81.2 7.95 74.12 54.54 58.61 71.81 79.11 67.7 68.13 52.62 52.9 71.52 72.61 1 min air min air 3 min air 4 min air 5 min air 6 min air 1 st stp 2 nd stp 1 st stp 2 nd stp 1 st stp 2 nd stp 1 st stp 2 nd stp 1 st stp 2 nd stp 1 st stp 2 nd stp 98.1 99.95 67.5 77.7 97.4 97.31 91.4 98.3 74.3 84.21 99.3 94.5 94.1 98.5 79.1 9.6 99.1 98.9 95.7 97.91 78.86 81.1 97.1 97.9 94.69 97.8 86. 92.6 98.1 96.7 97. 99.8 86.58 92.76 99.8 99.1 15
Ifl l AYDIN Recep Z YADANO LLARI Table 7: The results of two Stage extraction and s from aqueous solution (ph=1.17) using Alamine 336 in air medium with different time at 25 C * 66.73 82.21 8.93 1 min air min air 3 min air 4 min air 5 min air 6 min air remove to remove to remove to remove to remove to remove to organic organic organic organic phase organic phase organic phase phase phase phase 1 st ext 2 nd ext 1 st ext 2 nd ext 1 st ext 2 nd ext 1 st ext 2 nd ext 1 st ext 2 nd ext 1 st ext 2 nd ext 97.9 96.25 88.78 89.12 92.64 9.5 97.72 97.5 9.35 88.23 91.93 89.28 99.82 98.13 89.75 86.42 84.61 82.16 97.67 95.61 89.2 88.25 87.33 85.51 97.74 96.62 9.87 88.71 87.61 84.13 96.82 97.13 92.18 9.51 88.43 82.59 1 min air min air 3 min air 4 min air 5 min air 6 min air 1 st stp 2 nd stp 1 st stp 2 nd stp 1 st stp 2 nd stp 1 st stp 2 nd stp 1 st stp 2 nd stp 1 st stp 2 nd stp 81.1 88.87 93.6 96.7 95.4 85.4 96.6 85. 95.1 9.1 92.3 95.6 9.1 89.9 95.3 98.8 94.5 92.6 92. 95.6 98.7 95. 96.51 99.7 Table 8: The results of two Stage extraction and s from aqueous solution (ph=1.25) using Alamine 336 in air medium with different time at 25 C * 67.25 81.59 9.51 1 min air min air 3 min air 4 min air 5 min air 6 min air remove to remove to remove to remove to remove to remove to organic organic organic organic phase organic phase organic phase phase phase phase 1 st ext 2 nd ext 1 st ext 2 nd ext 1 st ext 2 nd ext 1 st ext 2 nd ext 1 st ext 2 nd ext 1 st ext 2 nd ext 82.92 82.13 85.61 83.59 9.23 88.56 84.32 83.52 86.42 85.59 92.77 9.27 85.53 83.44 87.23 85.42 92.4 9.55 89.21 87.29 88.97 86.69 97.94 95.43 87.62 85.13 85.35 83.23 96.36 95.58 85.69 85.12 85.15 84.51 93.57 91.18 1 min air min air 3 min air 4 min air 5 min air 6 min air 1 st stp 2 nd stp 1 st stp 2 nd stp 1 st stp 2 nd stp 1 st stp 2 nd stp 1 st stp 2 nd stp 1 st stp 2 nd stp 99.5 99.6 76. 85.1 99.1 99.1 97.8 99.5 93. 93.4 97.9 99.3 98.9 97.3 9.21 92.4 99.1 98.8 93.8 98.71 86.3 9.9 98. 96.6 96. 93.5 92.4 97.5 96.4 96.1 82.3 84.6 98.7 98.6 Then, the extraction was fulfilled by taking two 15 ml of solution adding 1 ml.38 M KMnO 4 and 1 ml, 3 % H 2 O 2 and experimental results are given in Table 1. In addition, extraction was performed by adding various amounts of.38 M KMnO 4, passing into to air at different time;the results are given in Table 11. 151
Leaching of Asphaltite Ash With H2SO4 and extraction of,, in Solution Table 9: The results of two Stage extraction and s from aqueous solution (ph=1.7) using Alamine 336 in air medium with different time at 25 C * 66.71 8.82 8.72 1 min air min air 3 min air 4 min air 5 min air 6 min air remove to remove to remove to remove to remove to remove to organic organic organic organic phase organic phase organic phase phase phase phase 1 st ext 2 nd ext 1 st ext 2 nd ext 1 st ext 2 nd ext 1 st ext 2 nd ext 1 st ext 2 nd ext 1 st ext 2 nd ext 74.6 72.19 68.66 65.47 55.81 55.12 76.22 74.11 6.29 59.61 64.25 62.27 79.1 76.17 66. 64.72 67.24 63.55 79.81 77.26 69.93 67.49 73.1 71.63 72.22 7.45 68.96 66.13 76.83 75.41 78.89 77.43 67.12 65.17 72.1 7.16 1 min air min air 3 min air 4 min air 5 min air 6 min air 1 st stp 2 nd stp 1 st stp 2 nd stp 1 st stp 2 nd stp 1 st stp 2 nd stp 1 st stp 2 nd stp 1 st stp 2 nd stp 92. 93. 84.1 76.48 97.7 97.8 96.6 99.3 74.1 67. 99.1 96.7 96.3 93.9 9,1 9.4 96.1 96.4 95.3 94. 74.5 83.4 96.5 97.4 96.1 94.6 86.8 79.4 99.2 96.7 94.5 97.3 87.1 86.9 96.5 99.1 Table 1 : The results of two Stage extraction and s of aqueous solution with.38 M KMnO 4 at 5 C * Extraction with KMnO 4 Extraction with H 2 O 2 remove to organic phase remove to organic phase 66.73 82.21 8.93 1 st ext 2 nd ext 1 st stp 2 nd stp 1 st ext 2 nd ext 1 st stp 2 nd stp 68.26 62.45 54.54 49.81 7.88 63.12 89.1 97.4 93.71 93.9 99.62 97.9 71.74 7.13 57.52 55.61 72.67 69.43 99.1 97.7 94.1 93.9 98.42 98.6 Table 1: Table The 11 results The of results twostage of Stage extraction extraction and and s of in aqueous solution which solution has with been.38 effected M KMnO 4 at with 5 C.38 M KMnO 4 in air medium * +2 ml KMnO 4 Remove to organic phase 15mL solution +5 ml KMnO 4 +5 ml KMnO 4 +1 min. Air + min. air +5 ml KMnO 4 +3 min. air 1 st ext 2 nd ext 1 st ext 2 nd ext 1 st ext 2 nd ext 1 st ext 2 nd ext 3.8 3.25 5.67 5.21 5.47 5.32 7.43 7.2 47.4 46.3 52.4 5.13 5.91 49.57 5.9 49.97 35.1 34. 63. 6.49 41. 4.28 35.83 33.21 1 st stp 2 nd stp 1 st stp 2 nd stp 1 st stp 2 nd stp 1 st stp 2 nd stp 99.9 98.6 78.3 84. 92.3 93.8 99.7 97.7 8.4 82.3 91. 97.9 99.8 98.4 91.1 9.3 99.8 98.1 99.7 96.9 91. 9.1 98.8 96.6 152
Ifl l AYDIN Recep Z YADANO LLARI Table 11: The results of two Stage extraction and s in solution which has been effected with.38 M KMnO 4 in air medium* +2 ml KMnO 4 Remove to organic phase 15mL solution +5 ml KMnO 4 +5 ml KMnO 4 +1 min. Air + min. air +5 ml KMnO 4 +3 min. air 1 st ext 2 nd ext 1 st ext 2 nd ext 1 st ext 2 nd ext 1 st ext 2 nd ext 3.8 3.25 5.67 5.21 5.47 5.32 7.43 7.2 47.4 46.3 52.4 5.13 5.91 49.57 5.9 49.97 35.1 34. 63. 6.49 41. 4.28 35.83 33.21 1 st stp 2 nd stp 1 st stp 2 nd stp 1 st stp 2 nd stp 1 st stp 2 nd stp 99.9 98.6 78.3 84. 92.3 93.8 99.7 97.7 8.4 82.3 91. 97.9 99.8 98.4 91.1 9.3 99.8 98.1 99.7 96.9 91. 9.1 98.8 96.6 Finally, extraction was performed by adding various amounts of MnO 2 and results are given in Table 12. Table 12: The results of two Stage extraction and s in solution which has been effected with MnO 2 in air medium * +solid MnO 2 Remove to organic phase 15mL solution +solid MnO 2 +solid MnO 2 +1 min. Air + min. air +solid MnO 2 +3 min. air 1 st ext 2 nd ext 1 st ext 2 nd ext 1 st ext 2 nd ext 1 st ext 2 nd ext 6. 5.93 3.52 3.5 6.45 6.2 6.48 5.92 67.8 66.23 55.28 53. 64. 62.29 66.5 65.21 69.8 67.12 65.95 64.82 6.7 59.3 59.6 57.16 1 st stp 2 nd stp 1 st stp 2 nd stp 1 st stp 2 nd stp 1 st stp 2 nd stp 98. 99.1 94.4 86.3 9.1 92.7 99. 99.4 95. 94.3 9.1 9.8 99.9 99.1 92.16 91.5 92.6 93.8 99. 98.9 93.7 94.1 94.5 97.3 * : Averages * : calculated Averages for calculated data obtained for from data three obtained independent from three extraction independent experiments extraction experiments By taking Tables 6, 7, 8 and 9 into consideration, maximum extraction yield was carried out with condition in Table 7. It seems that oxygen is the best oxidant. Because, and was oxidation with oxygene. Thus, M x O n y anions happen to polymeric structure. In all these analyses, Fe, Al, Ti and Ni were not shown in the tables since they could not be extracted. When the tables above are examined, it is seen that extraction yields 153
Leaching of Asphaltite Ash With H2SO4 and extraction of,, in Solution of, and passing into solution as a result of autoclave process, are rather low. This proves that ions of these elements are reduced under autoclave conditions and when taken into solution at oxidation steps that do not pass into organic phase. In very few of extraction experiments, as a result of autoclave process as regards the passing of these elements into organic phase, these elements are seen to be at oxidation step where they can pass into organic phase. This is shown in Table 15. Through the solution obtained after autoclave process, air was passed at different times, and the extraction yield is seen to increase remarkably as illustrated in Table 6. In case of performing oxidation procedures with KMnO 4 and MnO 2, it was found that extraction yields were low. It would be convenient to perform extraction procedure by passing air through solution in view of both easiness of the experiment and high extraction yield. For this, it seems sufficient to pass air for 1 min through solution whose ph has been brought to 1,17. The first extraction yields obtained under these circumstances were determined to be about 98 for, 89 for and 93 % for. Conclusions Hydrometallurgical processing consists usually of leaching followed by treatment of resulting pregnant aqueous solution by chemical or electrochemical means to obtain the separation, purification and recovery of the metals. Recovery of,,, Ni and Ti from asphaltite ash by H 2 SO 4 leaching displays differences according to application method. For example, the leaching yield of elements are about 9 % for,,, and 6 % of Ni can be leached by diluted H 2 SO 4. The ratio of H 2 SO 4 /ash is 2/1. If leaching is carried out by 1415 M H 2 SO 4 in atmospheric conditions about 9 % of, and Ni pass into solution. Consumption of H 2 SO 4 is the same. In the pressure leaching, all of these elements were leached by H 2 SO 4 in autoclave conditions. The ratio of H 2 SO 4 /ash is 1. In the pregnant solutions of direct leaching with H 2 SO 4, extraction can be performed with Alamine 336 by high yields, but it can not be fullfiled by pressure leaching because some of the elements in asphaltite ash reduced by SO 2 formed in reactions resulting. As a result, (I), () and (I) reduce to 3+, 3+ and 4+. These reduced ions can not be extracted with Alamine 336. If these ions are oxidized with air, extraction can be achieved. After extraction of these elements, an acidic solution remains. Gradually, more concentrate solutions of Ni and Ti are obtained by using this solution in leaching of the sample after autoclave. Ni and Ti can be separated from this solution with different methods. 154
Ifl l AYDIN Recep Z YADANO LLARI REFERENCES [1] Atamer H, Derman D, Özdil G, MTAAnkara, 1981. [2] Coflar T, Dicle niversity, PhD Thesis, 1995. [3] Coflar T & Ziyadano ullar R, 1998.Turkish Journal of Chemistry,22(4), pp 379. [4] Giavarini C, 1982. Fuel,61, pp 549. [5] Marin S, Cornejo S, Jara C, Duran N, 1996.Fresenius J Anal Chem, 355, pp 68. [6] Behera P, Mishra R, Chakravortty, 1993.Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, Articles,173(1) 161. [7] Behera P, Mishra Ms.S, hanty Ms.I, Chakravortty, 1994. Radiochimica Acta, 65 233. [8] BoRong B, YaZhi B, ChaoHong S, GaoDong W, Jun Q, ZhengBai C, 1992. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, Articles, 162(2), pp 391. [9] Daoud J.A, Zeid M.M, Aly H.F, 1997. Solvent Extraction and Ion Exchange,15 (2), pp3. [1] Behera P, Mishra R, Chakravortty, 1993. Radiochimica Acta,62, pp153. [11] Chattopadhyay P, Sinha T.K, Basu Baul T.S, Dec.1991. Analytical Sciences,7. [12] Behera P & Chakravortty, Sept.1993.Indian Journal of Chemistry, 32A, pp 825. [13] Marin S, Cornejo S, Jara C, Duran N, 1996. Fresenius J Anal Chem,355, pp 68. [14] ElReefy S.A, Awwad N.S, Aly H.F, 1997.J.Chem.Tech.Biotechnol. 69, pp 271. 155