University of Rochester Graduate Degree Program Assessment Plan



Similar documents
University of Rochester Master s Degree in Computer Science

Assessment Planning Guide for University of Rochester Graduate Degree Programs

Saint Louis University Program Assessment Plan. Program Learning Outcomes Curriculum Mapping Assessment Methods Use of Assessment Data

Electrical and Electronic Engineering Assessment Report Fall 2007 Spring 2008

How To Learn To Learn

Strategic Plan Cost Estimates

The specific objectives of the MMIS program are as follows:

University of Rochester, Department of Economics, Doctoral Degree Program Assessment Plan

Ph.D. in Art History Academic Assessment Plan

Professional Education Unit

Matrix of Graduate Program - MBA Student Learning Outcomes for Public Disclosure Identify Each Intended Outcome

SPEA CRIMINAL JUSTICE 3 RD YEAR REPORT MAY 2008

North Carolina State University 2014

Construction Management Program LYLES COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

Public Disclosure of Student Learning Form

SELF-STUDY FORMAT FOR REVIEW OF EXISTING DEGREE PROGRAMS

UNL College of Business Administration Assessment Report

The University of Louisville College of Business Dean

Western Carolina University Marketing B.S B.A Business Assessment Plan for

Program Quality Assessment. William Wiener

University Mission School Mission Department Mission Degree Program Mission

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. List all of the program s learning outcomes: (regardless of whether or not they are being assessed this year)

Texas A&M University Graduate and Professional Student Council Aggies Commit to Graduate and Professional Student Educational Experiences Fellowship

Academic Program Review Handbook

1. Overall, how satisfied are you working for The Company? Extremely Dissatisfied. Very Dissatisfied. Somewhat Dissatisfied.

COLLEGE OF PHARMACY Graduate Assessment Plan (Master s program)

Cornell Hospitality Business Plan Competition Official Rules and Guidelines

Assessment METHODS What are assessment methods? Why is it important to use multiple methods? What are direct and indirect methods of assessment?

Student and Academic Support Services Assessment Information Packet

PROCEDURES Doctoral Academic Program Review California State University, Stanislaus

Outcomes Assessment Plan Saint Peter s College Department of Business Administration, Undergraduate Program

Program Overview and Mission

Implementing Entrepreneurship Programs Utilizing a Change Management Model

California State University, Stanislaus Business Administration (MBA) ASSESSMENT REPORT and PLAN

Committee on Educational Planning, Policies and Programs May 21, UNC Degree Program Proposals...Courtney Thornton

Accelerated Graduate Degree Programs Proposal Template

Guidelines for Conducting an APR Self-Study

College of Business AACSB Continuous Improvement Review Accreditation Report

Computer Programming Richard Hoagland, Rand Riness Assessment Report. Criteria

All students are admitted during the summer and begin their coursework in the fall. Students must commit to completing these courses in sequence.

GRADUATE PROGRAM REVIEW POLICY. Texas Southern University

GRADUATE SCHOOL GUIDE

2013 Review of the MS in Sport Management

Assessment of Student Learning

College of Nursing PhD Program Assessment Plan. 1. Introduction

1. Introduction Graduate School, Teaching and Learning Certificate. 1.1 Unit Mission Statement

Baker College - Master of Business Administration Program Assessment Report CGS Assessment Report: MBA Program

Entrepreneurship, Innovation & Student Enterprise

SCHOOL OF BUSINESS STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT NEW PALTZ

M. CRITERIA FOR FACULTY EVALUATION

See how we think and do.

Previous Approvals: April 5, 2005; May 6, 2008; November 2, 2010; May 3, 2011, May 3, 2011, May 7, 2013

Assessment of master programs at a doctoral university. Nancy Stamp Vice Provost & Dean The Graduate School

PROSPECTUS. Business.IllinoisState.edu

Outcomes Assessment and Program Improvement Master of Business Administration

I - Institutional Information

Percent of programs with SLOs that are rated in category Established/Refining in Evaluation Rubric. Development of plan to improve advising

izone: Imagination-Ideas-Innovation Specialized Learning Space for the 21st Century

GRADUATE GROUP REVIEW PROTOCOL FOR SCHOOLS

Programme Curriculum for Master Programme in Entrepreneurship

College of Arts and Sciences

7. Assessment Students will acquire individual and group assessment skills.

SDA Bocconi Learning Goals

Graduate Programs in Education and Human Development

Transcription:

University of Rochester Graduate Degree Program Assessment Plan A. Program title: Technical Entrepreneurship and Management (TEAM) B. Program degree: Master of Science C. Program objectives and program learning outcomes: Program objective 1. students to be equipped with detailed technical knowledge as well as business principles. Core knowledge: Students demonstrate comprehensive, in depth knowledge of the theories, methods, and scholarship in the field. Written Communication: Students convey ideas or arguments in clear, concise, well organized assignments and papers. Oral Communication: Students convey ideas in cogent, persuasive, and organized presentations. Program objective 2. students to be successful professionals and hold positions of leadership in their field. Teamwork: Students demonstrate ability to work with others on projects, including sharing work involved in development of initial ideas and project plan, discussion of progress, and completion of work. Leadership: Students demonstrate leadership through positions held in scholarly and other professional activities. Professional Development: Students broaden their professional foundations through activities such as teaching, internships, fellowships, and grant applications. 1

Program objective 3. students to be effective entrepreneurs. Innovation/Entrepreneurship: Students demonstrate abilities in innovation and entrepreneurship through development of new inventions, patents, publications, productions, performances, commercialization assessment, and business plan creation. Critical Thinking: Students assess an issue/problem and are able to consider it critically, state it clearly, and describe it comprehensively delivering all relevant information necessary for full understanding. Effective Researchers: Students identify questions/problems that are pertinent to a field of study and provide a focus for making significant contribution to the field. D. Program assessment methods- direct methods 1. Final grade in core theory and method course TEM 401 will be gathered into a report every year. 2. Final grade in core theory and method course TEM 402 will be gathered into a report every year. 3. Final grade in core theory and method course TEM 411 will be gathered into a report every year. 4. Final grade in core theory and method course TEM 441 will be gathered into a report every year. 5. Final grade on final business plan in core theory and method course TEM 411 will be gathered into a report every year. 6. Student s business plan oral presentation will be reviewed by faculty using a score rubric every year. 7. Data gathered on leadership positions, internships, awards, and other held by students enrolled will be reported during exit interviews and graduate surveys each year. 8. Number of students who start an entrepreneurial venture will be collected and reported each year. E. Program assessment methods- indirect methods 1. Exit interviews will be conducted with each graduating student annually. The interview will include questions on systems, processes, course work, learning experience, satisfaction, and career placement. 2. A graduating student survey will be distributed electronically annually. The survey will include questions on student learning, course evaluation, and program evaluation. 3. Career data, such as placement 0, 3, and 6 months after graduation and position title will be collected annually from alumni. 2

F. Program assessment data review 1. Final grades will be gathered in theory and method courses TEM 401, TEM 402, TEM 411, and TEM 441 every year by program staff and reported to the Vice Provost for Entrepreneurship for review. 2. Data gathered on number of students who start an entrepreneurial venture, who hold leadership positions, who completed an internship, who received awards, and other will be reported each year by program staff and reviewed by the Vice Provost for Entrepreneurship and the deans of both the Hajim and Simon School. 3. Data gathered from both the one on one exit interviews and online graduate survey will be collected by program staff and reported to the Vice Provost for Entrepreneurship for review. G. Alignment of program learning outcomes and program assessment methods Instructions: Please use information from sections C F above to complete the following table. The table should show the alignment of program learning outcomes and assessment methods. For each method, note the standard for adequate student performance set by the program. See Appendix 1. UR Graduate Degree Program Assessment Plan Sample for guidance in completing the table. Table 1. Alignment of program learning outcomes with program assessment methods Program learning outcome category Core knowledge Program learning outcome students to be equipped with detailed technical knowledge as well as business savvy. Assessment method and Standard for adequate student performance Core theory and method course final grade in courses numbers: TEM 401, 402, 411, 441 Written Core theory and method course final grade in courses numbers: TEM 401, 402, 411, 441 3

Communicati on Oral Communicati on Team Work Leadership Professional Development students to be equipped with detailed technical knowledge as well as business savvy. students to be equipped with detailed technical knowledge as well as business savvy. students to be successful professionals and hold positions of leadership in their field. students to be successful professionals and hold positions of leadership in their field. students to be successful professionals and hold positions of leadership in Core theory and method course final grade in courses numbers: TEM 401, 402, 411, 441 Core theory and method course final grade in courses numbers: TEM 411 and 441 One on one exit interviews Graduating student survey 4

their field. One on one exit interviews Innovation/En trepreneurship Critical Thinking Effective Researchers students to be effective entrepreneurs. students to be effective entrepreneurs. students to be effective entrepreneurs. Graduating student survey Career placement 0, 3, and 6 months after graduation Standard: 50% of alumni will be placed upon graduation, 75% of alumni will be placed 3 months after graduation, and 90% of alumni will be placed 6 months after graduation. Career placement 0, 3, and 6 months after graduation Standard: 50% of alumni will be placed upon graduation, 75% of alumni will be placed 3 months after graduation, and 90% of alumni will be placed 6 months after graduation. Core theory and method course final grade in courses numbers: TEM 401, 402, 411, 441 5

6