( 1 ) Overview of Safety Measures ( 2 ) Overview of Measures for Attaining Greater Safety and Reliability



Similar documents
The integrity evaluation of the reactor building at unit4 in the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station

IAEA INTERNATIONAL FACT FINDING EXPERT MISSION OF THE NUCLEAR ACCIDENT FOLLOWING THE GREAT EAST JAPAN EARTHQUAKE AND TSUNAMI

May 23, 2011 Tokyo Electric Power Company

Update on Japan s Nuclear Energy Development and Spent Fuel Management Plans and Options

Public SUMMARY OF EU STRESS TEST FOR LOVIISA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Seismic Damage Information (the 231st Release) (As of 14:00 August 16, 2011)

Great East Japan Earthquake and the seismic damage to the NPSs

Testimony of Dr. Edwin Lyman. Senior Scientist, Global Security Program. Union of Concerned Scientists

RENCEE SAFETY MARIES

IV. Occurrence and Progress of Accidents in Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations and Other Facilities

Special Report on the Nuclear Accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station

Belgian Stress tests specifications Applicable to all nuclear plants, excluding power reactors 22 June 2011

Lessons Learned from the Nuclear Accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station

Government Degree on the Safety of Nuclear Power Plants 717/2013

Report. November 2013

IAEA INTERNATIONAL FACT FINDING EXPERT MISSION OF THE FUKUSHIMA DAI-ICHI NPP ACCIDENT FOLLOWING THE GREAT EAST JAPAN EARTHQUAKE AND TSUNAMI

Belgian Stress tests specifications Applicable to power reactors 17 May 2011

Resilience improvements to UK nuclear power plants

Fukushima Daini Nuclear Power Station: Progress Status Based on the Recovery Plan (As of the End of April 2013)

February 19, Senior Fellow, Nuclear Energy Systems & Services Division Power Systems Company

URESANDACTIONSCROSS-BORDERNETHER

Roadmap towards Restoration from the Accident at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, TEPCO. Progress Status

Nuclear power plant systems, structures and components and their safety classification. 1 General 3. 2 Safety classes 3. 3 Classification criteria 3

July 30, 2012 Nuclear Emergency Response Headquarters Government-TEPCO Med-and-long Term Response Council

Overview of the Multi-nuclide Removal Equipment (ALPS) at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station. March 29, 2013 Tokyo Electric Power Company

Operating Performance: Accident Management: Severe Accident Management Programs for Nuclear Reactors REGDOC-2.3.2

Earthquake Disaster Recovery Plan in TMG

Damage of Fukushima Nuclear Accident and a new compensation scheme

Reconstruction Support after the Great East Japan Earthquake

Tohoku University and the Great East Japan Earthquake Our Role, Responsibility and Mission. Susumu SATOMI President, Tohoku University

Restoration Status for Damage Caused by the Great East Japan Earthquake and Future Responses

J W Spencer School of Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Computer Science

Niigata as a temporary water works relay base: support for teams in a major seismic disaster

AP1000 Overview Westinghouse Electric Company LLC - All Rights Reserved

Fukushima Fukushima Daiichi accident. Nuclear fission. Distribution of energy. Fission product distribution. Nuclear fuel

Operation Tomodachi. and Lessons Learned. of Energy s Consequence. q Management Response Team (CMRT) to the. Reactor Accident

Investigation 6: What happens when plates collide?

The Realities of Disaster Recovery: How the Japan Data Center Council is Successfully Operating in the Aftermath of the Earthquake

Fukushima & Three Mile Island Reactor Accidents: Recovery, Cleanup, Lessons, & Future

Provisional Translation Basic Policy for the Contaminated Water Issue at the TEPCO s Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station

Tsunami Practice Questions and Answers Revised November 2008

Boiling Water Reactor Systems

Post Fukushima Off Site Radiological Monitoring Enhancements. January, 2015 Fuji Electric Corp. of America

Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 1-3 Evaluation method of the present amount of radioactive material released from the Reactor Building

HEALTH & SAFETY EXECUTIVE NUCLEAR DIRECTORATE ASSESSMENT REPORT. New Reactor Build. EDF/AREVA EPR Step 2 PSA Assessment

SAFETY EVALUATION OF. INDIAN NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS PHWRs AT MADRAS ATOMIC POWER STATION (MAPS)

(2) Action taken at the main control rooms a. General

Published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) number 166 of July 10th 2009 [1]

Sharing and coordinating the response to disaster relief and restoration

Japanese Life Insurance Industry s Response

Safety Analysis Probabilistic Safety Assessment (PSA) for Nuclear Power Plants REGDOC-2.4.2

TECTONICS ASSESSMENT

Critical Review of the Swedish Stress Tests Report

Fukushima Nuclear Disaster

IAEA Action Plan on Nuclear Safety 1

Status on Spanish Regulations and Industry. actions related to Filtered Containment. Venting Systems (FCVS)

I n d e p e n d e n t T e c h n i c a l E v a l u a t i o n a n d R e v i e w Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Accident First considerations

Damage to Sewage Treatment Systems caused by the Great East Japan Earthquake and the Government s Response

The Current Situation and Circumstances Regarding the Great Earthquake Damage

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION STANDARD REVIEW PLAN OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS WASHINGTON, DC July 17, 2012

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTION (EPFAQ) NEI REVISIONS 4 THROUGH 6; NUMARC/NESP 007

Draft IAEA Action Plan on Nuclear Safety

Datacenter Site Selection Checklist

Study of In-Data Centre Backup Offices for Banks

Proposal to Consolidate Post-Fukushima Rulemaking Activities

Response to the Great East Japan Earthquake by General Insurance Industry

Magnitude 8.8 OFFSHORE MAULE, CHILE

(2) Actions to be taken after Article 10 Notification under the Nuclear Emergency Preparedness Act

Damage to Drinking Water Systems and Restoration Measures after the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami. July 2011

EU S TRESS TEST SWISS NA TIONAL REPORT

Plant-specific safety review (RSK-SÜ) of German nuclear power plants in the light of the events in Fukushima-1 (Japan)

Presentations. Session 1. Slide 1. Earthquake Risk Reduction. 1- Concepts & Terminology

Final Report on the Accident at Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations of Tokyo Electric Power Company --- Recommendations ---

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON MODERN VVER GEN III TECHNOLOGY. Mikhail Maltsev Head of Department JSC Atomenergoproekt

ー Reconstruction after the Great East Japan Earthquake ー

EMERGENCY-RESPONSE CAPACITY OF LIFELINES AFTER WIDE-AREA EARTHQUAKE DISASTERS

By: Victor M. Delgado Jr National Power Corporation Philippines

How Did These Ocean Features and Continental Margins Form?

Exposures from the Events at the NPPs in Fukushima following the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami

DRAFT REGULATORY GUIDE DG-1154 (Proposed Revision 2 of Regulatory Guide 1.128, dated October 1978)

June 27, Scott C. Flanders, Director Division of Site Safety and Environmental Analysis Office of New Reactors

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE CONCEPTS OF A DISASTER INVESTIGATION ROBOT AND A DISASTER RESTRATION ROBOT

(1) Establishment of organizations and instruction for evacuation etc.

March 16, 2015 Susumu Tanaka NEC Corporation

Academy for Global Nuclear Safety and Security Agent

Nuclear Safety Regulation Reform in Japan

The Safety of Borssele Nuclear Power Station

Plate Tectonics: Ridges, Transform Faults and Subduction Zones

OVERVIEW OF THE OPERATING REACTORS BUSINESS LINE. July 7, 2016 Michael Johnson Deputy Executive Director for Reactor and Preparedness Programs

AN ANALYSIS OF TWITTER MESSAGES IN THE 2011 TOHOKU EARTHQUAKE

Overview. NRC Regulations for Seismic. Applied to San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station. NRC History. How we Regulate

Chapter Overview. Bathymetry. Measuring Bathymetry. Echo Sounding Record. Measuring Bathymetry. CHAPTER 3 Marine Provinces

Initiative in Preparation for Emergencies

ES Chapter 10 Review. Name: Class: Date: Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Report WENRA Safety Reference Levels for Existing Reactors - UPDATE IN RELATION TO LESSONS LEARNED FROM TEPCO FUKUSHIMA DAI-ICHI ACCIDENT

Fire Protection Program Of Chashma Nuclear Power Generating Station Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission 5/28/2015 1

Nuclear Power and Emergency Management

Georgia Performance Standards Framework for Natural Disasters 6 th Grade

Chapter 7 Earthquake Hazards Practice Exam and Study Guide

Transcription:

Contents 1 Effort for New Regulatory Requirements ( 1 ) Overview of a Gist of New Regulatory Requirements in Nuclear Regulation Authority ( 2 ) Major Requirements of a Gist of New Regulatory Requirements ( 3 ) Major Measures Required in New Regulatory Requirements (Image) 2 Safety Measures of Our Nuclear Power Stations ( 1 ) Overview of Safety Measures ( 2 ) Overview of Measures for Attaining Greater Safety and Reliability ( Reference ) ( 1 ) Evaluation of Fracture Zone on the Ground of Our Nuclear Power Stations ( 2 ) Locational Characteristic of Our Nuclear Power Stations ( Effect of Tsunami )

1 Effort for New Regulatory Requirements

1 (1) Overview of a Gist of New Regulatory Requirements in Nuclear Regulation Authority In light of the lesson from the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station and overseas regulatory trend, Nuclear Regulation Authority officially announced a draft gist of New Regulatory Requirements on February 6, 2013 including strengthening of the traditional safety standards and the measures against severe accident. On April 3, Nuclear Regulation Authority announced a gist of New Regulatory Requirements based on public comments. New Regulatory Requirements will be promulgated and enforced by July 18, 2013 as the rule of Nuclear Regulation Authority based on The Nuclear Reactor Regulation Law. Policy in Preparing New Regulatory Requirements Image of New Regulatory Requirements Place emphasis on Defense-in-Depth concept Eliminate common cause failures Assess and enhance protective measures against Assuming designbasis accident Design Basis (Reinforced) Review of Design Basis extreme natural hazards Assuming beyond designbasis accident Severe Accident Measures (New) Prevention of Core Damage Prevention of Containment Vessel Failure

1 (2) Major Requirements of a Gist of New Regulatory Requirements Basis Major Requirements Basis Tsunami Define Design Basis tsunami that has the largest impact on the facilities Protective facilities against tsunami such as seawall are constructed (quake-resistance standards is S-class) Earthquake and Tsunami The facilities having an important safety function should not be constructed on the exposure of active faults Active Fault Active faults with activities later than the Late Pleistocene (later than 120,000-130,000 years ago) be considered for seismic design Activities in the Middle Pleistocene (later than 400,000 years ago) be further investigated if needed Natural Phenomenon Additional of tornado, volcano and forest fire Fire Reinforcement of fire protection measures Design Basis Reliability Designing with multiplicity or variety and independence Strengthening of an external power source Reinforced Power Source (connection to different substations through multiple lines) Continuous running of an emergency diesel generator (for seven days) Cooling Facilities Protection of system for releasing heat (protection of seawater pumps, etc.)

1 (2) Major Requirements of a Gist of New Regulatory Requirements Basis Major Requirements Measures for Shutdown Failure Measures for anticipated transient without scram Measures for losing a cooling function of nuclear reactor Prevention of Core Damage Cooling and Depressurization Measures for losing a depressurization function of nuclear reactor Ensuring of ultimate heat sink (the place for releasing ultimate heat) Water and Power Source Ensuring of support function (makeup water, power source) Severe Accident Measures New Prevention of Containment Vessel Failure Cooling and Depressurization Cooling of Molten Core Hydrogen Explosion Cooling and depressurization of atmosphere in containment vessel, reduction of radioactive materials Heat removal from containment vessel and depressurization of containment vessel Cooling of molten core at the bottom of containment vessel and inside reactor pressure vessel Prevention of hydrogen explosion inside containment vessel Suppression of Radioactive Materials Dispersion and Management Function of Plant Suppression of Dispersion Spent Fuel Storage Pool On-site Emergency Response Center Specialized Safety Facility Suppression of radioactive materials dispersion in case of containment vessel failure Cooling at spent fuel storage pool Preparation of facilities that maintains function as a local headquarter Preparation of specialized safety facility which is available in the case of terrorism such as intentional aircraft crash

1 (3) Major Measures Required in New Regulatory Requirements (Image)

2 Safety Measures of Our Nuclear Power Stations

2 (1) Overview of Safety Measures In light of lessons learned from the accident at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, we have been implementing the emergency safety measures, etc. based on the instruction from the Japanese government. We have been taking voluntary, ongoing steps with our sights set on achieving even greater safety and enhanced reliability. The emergency safety measures Measures concerning the response to severe accident Medium-and long-term measures Measures for attaining greater safety and reliability We received the instruction of the government and implemented measures to correspond promptly when a severe accident occurred by any chance. Deployment of a Rubble Clearing Vehicle, etc. We are taking voluntary Medium-and long-term measures with our sights set on achieving even greater safety. Deployment of Portable Large Generator, etc. Please refer to next page. Substance Immediately after the accident at Fukushima, we received the instruction of the government and implemented the emergency safety measures. High-voltage Generator Truck, Deployment of temporary pumps and hoses, etc. Situation of the response Completed in April 2011 Completed in June 2011 In practice partly completed

2 (2) Overview of Measures for Attaining Greater Safety and Reliability We have been reviewing and designing as voluntary initiatives aimed at enhancing safety and reliability even further for ensuring trust in nuclear power. Voluntary initiatives based on technological insights emphasized by the government Measures Scheduled Completion Date Sendai Genkai 1. Measures of Power Supply Facility Additional Deployment of Emergency Generator under consideration under consideration Ensuring Reliability of External Power Supply in FY2019 in FY2013 Enhancement of Storage Battery Capacity under consideration under consideration Permanent Deployment of Power Cable for Connecting with Portable Large Generator completed (in September 2012) completed (in March 2013) 2. Measures of Cooling and Pouring Water Measures for Waterproof in Seawater Pump Area in FY2014 in FY2014 Development of Potable Large Pumping Vehicle in the first six months of FY2013 in FY2013 Diversifying Power Sources of Air Operated Valves in the first six months of FY2013 in FY2014 Strengthening Cooling Ability of Spent Fuel Storage in FY2014 in FY2014

2 (2) Overview of Measures for Attaining Greater Safety and Reliability Measures Scheduled Completion Date Sendai Genkai 3. Preventive Measures of Breaking Containment Vessel Installation of Ventilation Systems with Containment Vessel Filters in FY2016 in FY2016 Strengthening Measures Releasing Hydrogen in Containment Vessel in the first six months of FY2013 in FY2014 4. Other Measures Strengthening Monitoring of Spent Fuel Storage Area under consideration under consideration Constructing New Buildings with a Seismic Isolation Structure in FY2015 in FY2015 Additional Deployment of Heavy Equipment completed (in March 2013) completed (in March 2013) Maintenance and Improvement of High Ground in Power Station for Tsunami Countermeasures implementation according to each measures ( implementation according to each measures ( Adoption of Heatproof Seal for Primary Coolant Pump in FY2013-FY2014 under consideration Strengthening Nuclear Disaster Prevention (improvement of general hub function, etc) completed (in March 2013) completed (in March 2013) Strengthening Measures against Terrorism in March 2014 in March 2014

2 (2) Overview of Measures for Attaining Greater Safety and Reliability Measures for greater safety and reliability

Reference

(Reference 1) Evaluation of Fracture Zone on the Ground of Our Nuclear Power Stations Based on deliberations in a hearing about the earthquake and the tsunami, Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency is evaluating the fault on the premises of Genkai and Sendai Nuclear Power Station as follows. Because the fault has finished acting millions of years ago, it is not an active fault though there is a fault (fracture zone) on the premises. There is no active fault near the premises, the fault on a premises is dragged, and it does not move. There is no active fault which should be considered an interlock around the premises of Genkai Nuclear Power Station. At Sendai Nuclear Power Station, we are giving proper consideration to interlock, there is no active fault which should be considered it newly.

(Reference 2) Locational Characteristic of Our Nuclear Power Station (Effect of Tsunami 10 Tsunami brought enormous damage such as Tohoku earthquake generated around plate boundary Records of Tsunamis around our nuclear power stations Legend Source Region of around 2-6m high Tsunami Source Region of over 10m high Tsunami East China Sea Genkai Nuclear Power Station Chile Earthquake M9.5 in 1960 Nakakoshiki approx.80cm Chile Earthquake M8.8 in 2010 Power Station 約30cm an T r ench Japan Sea Sendai Nuclear Power Station North American Plate Genkai Nuclear Power Station Ja p Eurasian Plate E a s t e r n Margin o f J a p a n Sea Plate Boundary Chile Earthquake M9.5 in 1960 Karatsu-shi approx.20cm Pacific South West Coast of Hokkaido M7.8 in 1993 Plate Genkai-chou approx.20cm kai Philippine Sea n a Sendai Nuclear Power Station N Plate ugh o r T Our nuclear power stations are insulated from the influence of tsunami, because there is no plate boundary in East China Sea which faces our nuclear power stations, and also the water depth is shallow. This figure s source region of tsunami is mainly based on Hideo Watanabe Tsunami damage Souran in Japan (second edition) University of Tokyo Press(1998) And Depth of the water is based on data of National Geophysical Data Center

(Reference 2) Locational Characteristic of Our Nuclear Power Station (Effect of Tsunami The deeper the water depth of source region of tsunami is, the larger the scale of tsunami at coast is. Undersea section figure Surrounding ocean areas in Japan Around Genkai The water depth of ocean areas around Genkai and Sendai that our nuclear power station is located is shallow as the matter of several hundred meter. The water depth (meter) Around Sendai Around Eastern Margin of Japan Sea Around Nankai Trough Around Japan Trench The distance from continental areas (km) This figure based on J-EGG500(JODC-Expert Grid data for Geography-500m) published by Japan Oceanographic Data Center, Hydrographic and Oceanographic Department

(Reference 2) Locational Characteristic of Our Nuclear Power Station (Effect of Tsunami Genkai nuclear PSThe highest Supposing the tsunami that Tsushima Southern offshore fault(m7.4) is a wave source Genkai nuclear PS Sendai nuclear PS Sendai nuclear PSThe highest Supposing the tsunami that Nagasaki Spur fault(m8.1) is a wave source Genkai Sendai Height of PS from ground 11.0 above sea level 13.0 above sea level Highest tsunami expected 2.1 above sea level 3.7 above sea level Nankai Trough reference referencethe height of tsunami we estimated when a M9 earthquake occurred in Nankai Trough (May 31, 2011published value) 1.6 above sea level 2.5 above sea level We had ascertained to be sure not to impact to the site of Genkai PS from estimation assumed the M8 earthquake which is the largest interplate earthquake ever in Japan occurred in plate of the sea around Genkai PS. ( about 4.9m above sea level )