Vertisol Soil fertility Indicators in Rotational grazing on the Cauto Valley MATERIALS AND METHODS



Similar documents
Calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) are secondary nutrients, but they are

Understanding the. Soil Test Report. Client and Sample Identification

ALLELOPATHY OF Panicum maximum Jacq. CULTIVARS ON TREE AND SHRUB. FORAGE LEGUMES: Greenhouse Estimate. Abstract

FARMING FOR THE FUTURE How mineral fertilizers can feed the world and maintain its resources in an Integrated Farming System

Soil Sampling for Nutrient Management

FEEDING THE DAIRY COW DURING LACTATION

EFFECTS OF NITROGEN FERTILIZATION ON THE PRODUCTION OF Panicum. maximum cv. IPR 86 UNDER GRAZING

A SOIL TESTING SERVICE FOR FARMERS IN THAILAND, USING MOBILE LABORATORIES

Policy and institutional development

APPENDIX B CHARACTERIZATION OF SOILS AT TEST SITES

TEZA DE DOCTORAT Mariana POPA SUMMARY

LAB 5 - PLANT NUTRITION. Chemical Ionic forms Approximate dry Element symbol Atomic weight Absorbed by plants tissue concentration

Maximum growth rate of sugar beet as a result of nutrient supply, ph and other environmental factors. Olof Hellgren

Fertility Guidelines for Hops in the Northeast Dr. Heather Darby, University of Vermont Extension Agronomist

Principles of Crop Production

Nitrogen uptake in cotton+greengram intercropping system as influenced by integrated nutrient management

Water Footprint Calculations for Pasture Based Beef Production

MANAGEMENT OF MEADOW FESCUE PASTURE FOR HIGH-PRODUCING DAIRY COWS IN NORTHERN JAPAN

Cu soil-plant-animal cyclus: factors associated with bovine Cu status at the Gilgel Gibe valley, Ethiopia

Farming at dairy farms (produktion på mælkelandbrug)

9DORULVDWLRQRIHIIOXHQWVRIPDQXUHSURFHVVLQJ

African Organic Agriculture Manual Booklet Series No. 4 Soil organic matter management HOW DO I IMPROVE THE SOIL ORGANIC MATTER?

Managing of Annual Winter Forages in Southwest Texas

We are strongly interested in receiving you and people of your organization and country who are interested in attend our different activities.

Nitrogen Fixing Bacteria in Agriculture Now a Real Option Guy Webb B.Sc. REM Agricultural Consultant

WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND APPLICATION OF HYDROLOGICAL MODELING TOOLS AT A WASTEWATER IRRIGATION SITE IN NAM DINH, VIETNAM

1. Biodiversity & Distribution of Life

How To Manage Alfalfa

CURRICULUM VITAE Julio Florentino del Corral Cuervo 26 th September, 2008

Nitrate and Nitrite Removal from Municipal Drinking Water Supplies with Electrodialysis Reversal

Create Your Own Soil Profile Ac5vity

Economic and environmental analysis of the introduction of legumes in livestock farming systems

SOIL HEALTH COVER CROPS RELAY CROPPING

Natural Resource Scarcity:

USING HUMIC COMPOUNDS TO IMPROVE EFFICIENCY OF FERTILISER NITROGEN

Chapter D9. Irrigation scheduling

Published 2005 INTRODUCTION

PARTICIPATORY ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION IN THE RIO BLANCO WATERSHED: ECOSYSTEM BASED ADAPTATION ACTIONS TO ADDRESS CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS IN THE

Nutrient and Fertilizer Value of Dairy Manure

Environmental Outcomes of Conservation Agriculture in North Italy

AnGR of Argentina: Actions and Challenges

THE KILL DATE AS A MANAGEMENT TOOL TO INCREASE COVER CROPS BENEFITS IN WATER QUALITY & NITROGEN RECYCLING

You d be mad not to bet on this horse.

CORN IS GROWN ON MORE ACRES OF IOWA LAND THAN ANY OTHER CROP.

PROXIMITY TO THE ECOLOGICAL MODEL OF DAIRY GOAT SYSTEMS IN THE ANDALUSIAN MOUNTAINS (SPAIN)

STUDY QUESTIONS FOR GEOLOGY 408U/508

Association of Panamerican Veterinary Medical Colleges

Impact of Water Saving Irrigation Systems on Water Use, Growth and Yield of Irrigated Lowland Rice

FUTURE CHALLENGES OF PROVIDING HIGH-QUALITY WATER - Vol. II - Environmental Impact of Food Production and Consumption - Palaniappa Krishnan

Agricultural Production and Research in Heilongjiang Province, China. Jiang Enchen. Professor, Department of Agricultural Engineering, Northeast

What Is Humic Acid? Where Does It Come From?

Natural and Advanced Treatment Systems for Wastewater Management at Municipal Solid Waste Disposal Site in Developing Countries

Characterization of Pasture- Based Dairy Farms in Florida and Georgia

How To Make A Solar Grain Dryer

Three Reasons to Broaden Your Fertigation Knowledge

LELY VOYAGER. Automatic grazing system. Frontal grazing: the innovative way. innovators in agriculture.

University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences. Gulf Coast Research and Education Center th Street East Bradenton, FL 34203

policy brief Author: The importance of strengthening environmental measurements Key messages Junio 2014

Moringa Oleifera a Multipurpose Tree:

WILLOCHRA BASIN GROUNDWATER STATUS REPORT

Towards climate-smart agriculture

ENE 806, Project Report 3 CHEMICAL PRECIPITATION: WATER SOFTENING. Grégoire Seyrig Wenqian Shan

A comparison of greenhouse gas emissions from the New Zealand dairy sector calculated using either a national or a regional approach.

WHAT IS IN FERTILIZER OTHER THAN NUTRIENTS?

Corn Stalks and Drought-Damaged Corn Hay as Emergency Feeds for Beef Cattle

Worksheet for Calculating Biosolids Application Rates in Agriculture

RELATIVE PERFORMANCE OF SUGAR BEET VARIETIES UNDER THREE PLANT DENSITIES IN NEWLY RECLAIMED SOIL INTRODUCTION

SOIL TEST LEVELS AND NUTRIENT BUDGETS IN THE WESTERN U.S.

How To Improve Energy Efficiency In Cubana

R E S T R I C T E D B R E E D I N G A N D R O T A T I O N A L G R A Z I N G

Food Security and Water in Central America in the context of Climate Change: Maureen Ballestero Chair GWP Costa Rica

INTEGRATED NATIONAL ADAPTATION PILOT República de Colombia INAP

III. THE MICROBIAL BIOMASS

ReUseWaste WP6.3 Assessment of soil quality effects and nutrient availability of manure ash and biochar based biofertilisers

SOIL FERTILITY AND PLANT NUTRITION PSSC 453, Fall 2008

EFFECT OF ORGANIC MATTER ON NITROGEN MINERALIZATION IN FLOODED AND DRY SOIL

Organic SOP-Grazing describes the procedures that ensure the organic requirements are met with regard to cattle grazing.

ADAPTABILITY AND STABILITY OF ALFALFA CULTIVARS. Abstract

Culture in field conditions - Challenges A South American point of view Roberto Campos Pura Natura, Argentina

The ABCs of Pasture Grazing

Importance of forestry reserves to the regulation of water quality and microalgae structure of temporary ponds in Burkina Faso (West Africa)

Physiography, Geography and Climate of Latin America (Lecture 3)

Pasture, Rangeland, and Forage Insurance: A Risk Management Tool for Hay and Livestock Producers

Determination of calcium by Standardized EDTA Solution

San Jacinto County Appraisal District PO Box 1170 Coldspring, Texas (Fax)

Inovagri: International Workshop on Technology Innovations in Irrigation Theme 2, Round Table 4: Engineering of Land Drainage

- focus on green house gas emission

Chemical nutrient analysis of different composts (Vermicompost and Pitcompost) and their effect on the growth of a vegetative crop Pisum sativum


These calculations are on a hectare basis or for a given size of an experimental plot.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL

What is Nitrite Toxicity? Georgia Cattleman, June 2002 John Andrae, Forage Extension Specialist

BEC Feed Solutions. Steve Blake BEC Feed Solutions

Yield and quality of parsley depend on water quality

Transcription:

Vertisol Soil fertility Indicators in Rotational grazing on the Cauto Valley Jorge Ray*, Diocles Benítez*, Rigoberto García**, M. Nieto* and D. García* * Institue for Agricultural Research Jorge Dimitrov, Bayamo, Granma, Cuba ** Institue for Animal Science, San José de Las Lajas, Mayabeque, Cuba jvray@dimitrov.cu ABSTRACT The behavior of some Vertisol soil fertility indicators was randomly studied for four years, at a milk production unit on the Cauto River Valley, Cuba. Brachiaria humidicola cv CIAT 679 pasture was used without irrigation and fertilization. Grazing intensity had mean variation values, of 243 UGM/ha in the rainy season and 190 UGM/ha in the dry season. The daily grazing stripe depended on pasture availability. The occupation time was 2 days. No significant variations were observed in time, or associated to grazing intensity in terms of physical properties of the soil. The apparent density decreased according to the season (P < 0.05) and the highest value was observed in the dry season (1.42 and 1.18 g/cm 3 ). The grazing stripe variable brought benefits to the balance of exchangeable ions, with a higher ratio of Ca 2+ /Mg 2+ and Mg 2+ /K +. Interaction between season and grazing was produced in mobile forms of soil nitrogen and NO 3 -, NH 4 + and NFH, higher during the rainy season in the grazing areas. Stripe grazing does not diminish the main soil fertility indicators; however, it does favor nitrogen mobility and mineralization, depending on the most suitable grazing stripe variable for this kind of soil. Key Words: soil fertility, rotational grazing, season INTRODUCTION Several authors have reported that many of the factors that limit tropical pasture production are related to soil limitations (Pezo, 1997; Dias-Filho, 2001). When the pasture lands are subjected to intensive management systems of rotational grazing, the number of organisms living in the dead leaves is sharply increased; the same occurs to soil biota, which benefits soil fertility due to the contribution such organisms make by decomposing and incorporating organic matter into the soil (Sánchez et al., 1996). Nevertheless, the literature reviewed on rotational grazing, does not offer complete information on the variable of defoliation intensity. It has been acknowledged that increases in defoliation intensity of tropical pastures can improve their structure, quality and purity (Baldo et al., 1998), but it is important to know how much soil, pasture and animal stability are affected by the sharp increases in defoliation intensity. Even by increasing defoliation intensity, whether by reducing the lot size or by increasing the number of animals, may cause several various effects on the behavior of these elements of the production system, which in the case of soil, lack of knowledge prevails. The purpose was to analyze the behavior of some fertility indicators of a Verstisol soil in rotational grazing conditions using the stripe grazing land variable, in order to adapt the procedures for system management. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study was conducted on a cattle farm at the Experimental Station for Pastures and Forages, of the Institute for Agricultural Research Jorge Dimitrov, in Granma, 10 ½ km from the city of Bayamo (20º 18' 13'' north latitude and 76 39' 48'' east longitude. It consisted in evaluating the influence of rotational grazing on the variation of some Vertisol soil fertility indicators, for four years that applied stripe grazing as a strategy, and where daily stripes of pasture land of variable sizes are assigned to herds, depending on pasture availability (Ray et al., 1998). In the study area, the mean air temperature was 24.2 C in the dry season (November-April) and 27.7 C in the rainy season (May-October), with maximum values of 28.6 C and 32.8 C, respectively. Annual rainfall ranged between 815 and 1 052 mm. The base pasture was Brachiaria humidicola cv. CIAT 679, on dry land and without fertilizing. Vertisol soil, according to soil genetic classification (Hernández et al., 1999) is mainly characterized by the accumulation or large quanti- ISSN 2224-7920

Vertisol Soil fertility Indicators in Rotational grazing on the Cauto Valley ties of clay type 2:1 (montmorillonite) whose total content is more than 60% in all the soil profile, Therefore, under Granma s climatic conditions, large and mid-size prismatic block structures, with sliding sides and wide cracks during the dry season, are developed. Outflow is extremely low, thus producing very bad superficial and internal draining, which leads to flooding in the rainy season. Treatments and design. Two areas were used for the treatments, one experimental, for 40 5/8 Holstein-3/8 Zebú cows, in segmented grazing conditions; and another without grazing, according to a completely randomized designed. Procedure. The grazing area had 26 stripes of 33 x 132 m each (0.4356 ha), with interior legs. The size of the daily segment for grazing was defined according with the availability of pasture, so biomass supplies could allow an estimated dry matter consumption by the herd of 3 % of mean live weight, in which 90 % of estimated pasture yields were considered, in order to increase availability. During the dry season, under time restrictions for base pasture, the size of the stripe was used to guarantee availability according to the grazing time, due to consumption of complementary feeds. A single segment was calculated for the whole herd so that in-line grazing could be possible. Accordingly, each stripe was occupied for two days maximum, and the grazing intensity varied, from 243 UGM/ha in the rainy season, to 190 UGM/ha in the dry season. The complementing area was planted with sugar cane (0.8 ha), king grass (2.5 ha) and the protein bank, with Leucaena leucocephala (2.2 ha). Proper management allowed the animals to keep grazing between 18-19 h in the rainy season and 16-17 h in the dry season. To measure the effects of grazing, four stripes were chosen from the grazing area, and used in the whole sampling and analysis process. An area of approximately two stripes was not under grazing (witness). Analysis of physical, chemical (mainly nitrogen forms in the soil), were made, and sampling was made diagonally. Physical soil analyses included 5 samples per enclosure. The texture and macrostructure were determined according to the method described in the Specific Standard No. 408/1981 of the Ministry of Agriculture; apparent density (d), through the cylinder technique; real density (D) by picometer; and total porosity (Pt) was calculated according the expression of Pt = (1-d/D) x 100. For the chemical indicator analysis 8 samples were taken (0.20 cm of depth from all the areas in every quarter of the year, starting from 12 samples per stripe. PH was determined for H 2 O and KCl, using a potentiometer; phosphor (P 2 O 5 ) and potassium (K 2 O), following the Oniani method (1964); calcium (Ca ++ ) and magnesium (Mg ++ ), by complexometric titration, with EDTA; and sodium ion activity, by flame photometry (AOAC, 2005). For nitrogen forms determination, 12 samples in each area were taken at a depth of 0-20 cm, assuming that in poorly developed soils, nitrogen contents follow a similar distribution to organic matter, and deeper accumulations are not significant (Fassbender, 1975). Sample taking was carried out every four months, in the rainy and dry seasons. Nitrate ion (NO 3 - ) activity was determined by the phenol-disulfonic acid method; ammonium ion (NH 4 + ) activity was determined by the Nessler method (AOAC, 2005); and easily hydrolizable nitrogen activity (NFH) was determined by the Tiurin-Kononova method (Kaúrichev, 1984). Statistical analysis. For data analysis STATISTIC software for Windows, 10.0 (Stat- Soft 2011) was used. A linear model was used to control the grazing effects (2), year (4) and evaluation period (2), season (2) and possible interactions. For comparison of means, the Newman- Keuls (StatSoft, 2011) test was applied. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The physical properties of the soil are shown in Table 1. The values for the study show that there are no significant variations in time, or associated to grazing intensities to which the system was exposed, which corroborates findings by Brunet et al. (1998) about the poor variations the physical properties of the soil undergo in a relatively not very long time. This result is similar to findings by Hernández and Milera (1996), who stated that the implementation of rotation cycles with occupation times that produce grazing intensities of up to 250 UGM/ha cause no soil property variations. The soil apparent intensity as an indicator is related to soil compression (Fig. 1). A remarkable effect of season was produced, observed to be higher in the rainy season. This behavior does not

J. Ray, D. Benítez, R. García, M. Nieto and D. García seem to be linked to the grazing effect, but it is related to the kind of soil studied, characterized by an increase in the total mean porosity in the rainy season. Therefore, mass decreases in the same volume of soil, which happens to apparent density as well. On the contrary, in the rainy season the total mean porosity decreases to the extent of cracking the soil, forming very stable structures with higher apparent density. Crespo et al. (2011) reported a value of 1.01 g/cm 3 on typical red ferralitic leached soil during the dry season. Alegre and Lara (1991) achieved higher apparent density values than the ones in this paper using B. humidicola associated with Desmodium ovalifolium under high grazing conditions. Costa et al. (1999) found an increase in the apparent density of up to 20 cm, regarding pasture utilization time in the eighth year, with similar values to the ones found here in the dry season. Given the importance of discriminating the influence of rotational grazing for preservation or improvement of some soil fertility indicators, in order to recommend the system on Vertisoles, cationic interactions were determined (Table 2), as an element that may contribute with the capacity for soil cationic exchange. The Ca/Mg relationship shows improvements in terms of nutrient diffusion, and despite poor calcium availability can be observed, it is higher in grazing areas. The Ca/Na relationship shows an improvement in nutrient diffusion, especially potassium, observed in Mg/K and Na/K relationships, in which sodium activity is reduced; whereas potassium activity is increased. Similar results were presented by Costa et al. (1999) on Podzol soil. B. humidicola is also reported as a species that requires lower quantities of P, Ca and K than other bracharia species. The values of these elements found at the end of the study of rotational grazing areas are higher than the critical levels required for this pasture, according to CIAT (1981). This may contribute with the pasture s more stable persistence and yield levels. The analysis of nitrogen forms on the soil showed that there was interaction between season and grazing (Table 3). The rotational grazing area is less unstable within the season in comparison to the witness; the highest values achieved for each of indicator show that grazing management favors nitrogen mobility and mineralization. Changing management conditions of the grazing areas seem to cause greater stability of nitrogen forms, and additionally, fresh nitrogen conversion is more effective into mineral nitrogen, due to animal density per area unit applied, which makes possible higher nitrogen intake and contribution through cow pats and urine while grazing. Ramos et al. (1993), in a Vertisol fertilization study recommended N application based on grazing pasture removal behavior, and soil N recovery, which corroborates the importance of grazing management techniques that favor balanced processes on these kinds of soils. According to Alvim et al. (1990), B. humidicola is characterized for its low response to N application, and for absorbing and using both forms of nitrogen (NH 4 + y NO 3 - ), better than other bracharias. Acordingly, favorable results in rotational grazing in mobile soil N forms help infer that the application of variable management of stripe grazing is a contribution to improving the main elements required for the species in question, which coincides with Dias-Filho (2000), in that in order to increase cultivated tropical pasture sustainability, soil management should be based on practices that maximize the nutrient cycle, minimize losses and prioritize nutrient uptake in the system. CONCLUSIONS The use of rotational stripe grazing does not diminish the behavior of the main indicators of soil fertility; however, it does favor nitrogen mobility and mineralization, which is related to variable management of the grazing stripe, suitable for the kind of soil in its interaction with the climatic variables. REFERENCES ALEGRE, J. C. y LARA, P. D. (1991). Efecto de los animales en pastoreo sobre las propiedades físicas de suelos de la región tropical húmeda de Perú. Pasturas Tropicales, 13, 18. ALVIM, M. J.; BOTREL, M.; VERNEQUE, R. S. y SALVATI, J. A. (1990). Aplicação de nitrogênio em acessos de Brachiaria. 1. Efeito sobre a produção de matéria seca. Pasturas Tropicales, 12, 2. A.O.A.C. (2005). Official Methods of Analysis. Washington, D. C., USA: Ed. Assoc. Off. Agric. Chem. BALDO, A.; ROMERO, J.; PIERONI, G. y ARMENDARIZ, M. (1998). Efecto de la intensidad de pastoreo sobre la eficiencia de cosecha y la calidad del forraje. XVI Congreso Panamericano de Ciencias Veterinarias, Sta. Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia.

Vertisol Soil fertility Indicators in Rotational grazing on the Cauto Valley BRUNET, R.; GOUNOU, E. y COULIBALY, S. (1998). Fertilidad de un suelo ferralítico rojo dedicado al cultivo de pasto. XI Seminario Científico del INCA, La Habana, Cuba. CIAT (1981). Tropical Pasture Program. Annual Report. Cali, Colombia: Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical. COSTA, N.; THUNG, M.; TOWNSEND, C. R.; MOREIRA, P. y LEÔNIDAS, F. C. (1999). Quantificação das características físico-químicas do solo sob pastagens degradadas. Pasturas Tropicales, 21, 74. CRESPO, G.; RUIZ, T. E. y ÁLVAREZ, J. (2011). Efecto del abono verde de Tithonia (T. diversifolia) en el establecimiento y producción de forraje de P. purpureum vc. Cuba CT-169 y en algunas propiedades del suelo. Rev. Cubana Cienc. Agríc., 45 (1),79-82. DÍAS-FILHO, M. B. (2000). Growth and Biomass Allocation of the C4 Grasses Brachiaria brizantha and B. humidicola under Shade. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasilera, 35 (12), 2335-2341. DÍAS-FILHO, M. B. (2001). Processos e causas de degradação e estratégias de recuperação em pastagens tropicais. I Foro Latinoamericano de Pastos y Forrajes, Instituto de Ciencia Animal, La Habana, Cuba. FASSBENDER, H. W. (1975). Química de suelos con énfasis en suelos de América Latina. Turrialba, Costa Rica: Instituto Interamericano de Ciencias Agrícolas de la OEA. HERNÁNDEZ, MARTA y MILERA, MILAGROS (1996). Efecto de un manejo rotacional flexible en la fertilidad del suelo. Pastos y Forrajes, 19, 171. HERNÁNDEZ, A.; PÉREZ, J. M.; BOSCH, D.; RIVERO, L.; CAMACHO, et al. (1999). Nueva versión de la clasi- Received: 12-05-2014 Accepted: 20-05-2014 ficación genética de los suelos de Cuba. Ciudad de La Habana, Cuba: Instituto de Suelos, Ministerio de la Agricultura, AGRINFOR. KAÚRICHEV, N. P. (1984). Prácticas de Edafología. Moscú: Editorial Mir. ONIANI, O. G. (1964). Determinación del fósforo y potasio del suelo en una misma solución de los suelos Krasnozen y Podsólicos en Georgia. Agrojima, 6, 25. PEZO, D. (1997). Producción y utilización de pastos tropicales para la producción de leche. En Clavero, T. (ed.). Estrategias de alimentación para la ganadería tropical. Maracaibo, Venezuela: Centro de Transferencia de Tecnología en Pastos y Forrajes, Univ. de Zulia. RAMOS, N.; HERRERA, R. S. y CURBELO, F. (1993). Efecto de la fertilización nitrogenada en suelo ferralítico rojo típico. II. Composición química y eficiencia de utilización del N. Rev. Cubana Cienc. Agríc., 27, 239. RAY, J. V.; BENÍTEZ, D. G.; DÍAZ, MARGARITA; GARCÍA, F.; VEGA, A. y GUERRA, J. (1998). Adecuación de los procedimientos de manejo de métodos de pastoreo racional para la producción de leche con bajos insumos en suelo Vertisol. Informe final de investigación, junio de 1998, PNCT, Dpto. de Zootecnia, I.I.A. Jorge Dimitrov, Granma, Cuba. SÁNCHEZ, SARAY; MILERA, MILAGROS; ALONSO, O. y SUÁREZ, J. (1996). Evaluación de la biota del suelo en un sistema de manejo rotacional racional intensivo. X Seminario Científico de Pastos y Forrajes, EEPF Indio Hatuey, Matanzas, Cuba. STATSOFT (2011). STATISTIC for Windows User s Guide. Tulsa.

Table 1. Physical properties of the soil in rotational grazing and witness (non-grazing) areas during the initial and final evaluation periods Indicators Rotational grazing area Non-grazing area (witness) ±EE 1 st year 4 th year 1 st year 4 th year Texture (%) 2-0.2 mm 0.30 0.26 0.29 0.20 0.04 0.2-0.02 mm 32.88 34.95 34.78 32.78 1.38 0.02-0.002 mm 24.68 26.48 25.81 28.12 0.84 < 0.002 mm 41.85 40.56 39.38 38.90 0.97 Real density (g/cm 3 ) 2.38 2.66 2.36 2.41 0.10 Capillary elevation (mm) 164.5 124.4 160.0 126.0 9.96 Plasticity index (%) 41.9 35.9 38.8 34.8 2.25 Table 2. Inter cationic relationships in rotational grazing and non-grazing areas Relation Rotational grazing area Non-rotational area (witness) 1st year 4th year 1st year 4th year Ca/Mg 1.50 1.44 1.43 1.19 Ca/Na 26.15 18.95 14.49 12.39 Mg/K 19.25 28.18 26.17 23.26 Na/K 1.10 2.14 2.59 2.25 Table 3. Behavior of soil nitrogen forms according to the season in rotational grazing and non-grazing (witness) areas Indicators Rotational grazing area Non-grazing (witness) (mg/100 g) ± EE Rainy Dry Rainy Dry + NH 4 2.87 a 2.69 ab 1.21 c 2.67 b 0.10* - NO 3 1.46 b 2.02 a 1.32 c 1.31 c 0.65* NFH 20.06 a 19.91 a 16.23 b 17.20 b 0.32*