Electricity market reform in Japan October, 2014 Electricity Market Reform Office Agency for Natural Resources and Energy (ANRE)
History of Reforms in Japan No competition in the electricity market before 1995: 10 vertically integrated GEUs (General Electricity Utilities) dominated and controlled the market. No. Year enforced Overview METI embarked series of reforms... 1 1995 Open the IPP (Independent Power Producer) market Allow specified-scaled and vertically integrated power generators 2 2000 Introduce partial retail competition Accounting separation of transmission/distribution sector 3 2005 Expand retail competition Establish the wholesale power exchange (JEPX) and its supporting body for transmission in wider areas 4 2008 Modify the rule of wheeling rates 1
Japan s Electricity Market Outline 10 Vertically Integrated Power Companies (EPCOs) and New Entrance (PPSs) Market volume: 1094TWh / 287 (2012) competition for over 50kW customers (62% of the market in 2013) - Share of non-epcos: 4.2% (2013) - 1.3% of the total retail market sales is transacted at JEPX (2013) Average household electricity price was 21.26 yen/kwh before 3.11 (2011); 24.33 yen/kwh (2013) (24.81 yen/kwh in 1994) Frequency West Japan: 60Hz East Japan: 50Hz *EPCO: Electricity Power Company *PPS: Power Producers and Suppliers *JEPX: Japan Electric Power Exchange Hokkaido (peak demand: about 5.7 ) is connected by DC line. Okinawa Chugoku 10.85 5.57 2.4 Kyushu 15.21 Frequency in West: 60Hz DC Direct Current, FC Frequency Conversion 16.66 Kansai 26.82 Shikoku 5.26 5.57 DC Tie line 1.4 Hokuriku 5.26 5.57 BTB 0.3 Chubu 24.78 Frequency in East: 50Hz Hokkaido 5.52 Tohoku 13.72 Tokyo 50.78 FC 1.2 DC Tie line 0.6 12.62 2
Problem revealed by 3.11 Negative aspects of regional monopoly system with 10 big and vertically integrated EPCOs were revealed in the Great Earthquake 3years ago: 1. Lack of system to transmit electricity beyond regions 2. Little competition and strong price control 3. Limit in handling the change in energy mix including the increase in renewables 5.57 Chugoku 10.85 Kyushu 15.21 Frequency in West: 60Hz * DC direct current, FC frequency conversion 16.66 2.4 5.57 Kansai 26.82 Shikoku 5.26 DC Tie line 1.4 Hokuriku 5.26 BTB 5.57 0.3 Chubu 24.78 Frequency in East: 50Hz DC Tie line FC 1.2 Hokkaido 5.52 Tohoku 13.72 Tokyo 50.78 0.6 12.62 3
Electricity Market Reform in Japan: Roadmap April 2, 2013, Cabinet decided the Policy on Electricity System Reform to realize three objectives in Japan s market with a three-step approach. 3 Objectives (1) Securing a stable supply of electricity (2) Suppressing electricity rates to the maximum extent possible (3) Expanding choices for consumers and business opportunities (1 st Bill) 2013 (2 nd Bill) 2014 (3 rd Bill) 2015 1 st Step 2015 2 nd Step 2016 3 rd Step 2018-2020 Apr. 2, 2013 Cabinet Decision Nov. 13, 2013 Jun. 11, 2014 1 st reform 2 nd reform 3 rd reform Cabinet Decision on the Policy on Electricity System Reform The 1 st Bill The 2 nd Bill Establishment of the Organization for Crossregional Coordination of Transmission Operators (OCCTO) 小 売 全 面 Full retail 自 由 化 competition ( 参 入 自 由 化 ) ( At around 2015:Transition to new regulatory organizations) Period of transitional arrangement for retail tariff Abolishment of retail tariff Legal unbundling of transmission /distribution sector 4
1 st step: Establish the OCCTO The 1 st Bill Establish the Organization for Cross-regional Coordination of Transmission Operators (OCCTO) in 2015 Main functions of OCCTO 1. Aggregate and analyze the EPCO s supply-demand plans and grid plans, and order to change EPCO s plans such as tie lines construction 2. Order EPCOs to reinforce generations and power interchanges under a tight supply-demand situation Kyushu 5.57 JEPX Frequency in West: 60Hz 16.66 2.4 OCCTO (Power Exchange) (Coordination of s ) Chugoku 5.57 Kansai DC Tie line 1.4 Shikoku 5.57 Chubu * DC direct current, FC frequency conversion, Transmission and Distribution System Operator Hokuriku BTB 0.3 Frequency in East: 50Hz Hokkaido DC Tie line 0.6 Tohoku 12.62 Tokyo (TEPCO) FC 1.2 5
2 nd step: Full Competition The 2 nd Bill Expand retail competition to the residential sector in 2016, opening a new market Maintain regulated tariffs to 10 big EPCOs at around 2018-2020 Liberalized Sector (50kW~) Share of total power: 63% Large factory Large building Building Medium factory Small Factory Regulated Sector (~50kW) Market Volume ; 7.5 trillion (=$ 75bn, 54bn) Number of contracts Residential Customers : 76.8m Small shops and offices: 7.4m Share of total power: 37% Small shop Residential Customer 6
2 nd step: Full Competition Revision of Business License Categories The 2 nd Bill Business License categories under the Electricity Business Act, such as General Electricity Utilities (GEU) and Wholesale Electricity Utilities, will be revised in line with the full retail choice. Current categories New categories (after 2016) GEU (10EPCOs) Supply for customers, including those in regulated sector with obligation to supply, regional monopoly and rate regulation Secure stable frequency and voltage Obtain 3 licenses (not necessary to change corporate organization) Transmission & Distribution PPS (Power Producer and Supplier) Supply for customers in liberalized sector (more than 50kW) Wholesale Electricity Utilities, etc Supply for GEU Notification Permission Registration Regulation based on the level playing field of competition Operate and maintain transmission /distribution lines Regional monopoly and rate regulation Supply for customers Obligation to secure the capacity of power supply Regulation based on the level playing field of competition 7
3 rd step: Unbundle the T/D sector Unbundle the transmission/distribution sectors of big EPCOs by legal unbundling style at around 2018-2020 Holding company The 3 rd Bill (will submit in 2015) company Transmission/Distribution company (System operation) (Transmission/ distribution facilities) 送 配 電 設 備 company <Note> Competitive Big EPCOs will be required to unbundle transmission and distribution companies from generation ones or retail ones, in legal unbundling. Both the holding company style and the affiliated company style, in which a generation and retail company has a transmission and distribution company as a subsidiary company,are allowed. Regulated Regional monopoly Network tariff Responsibility for maintaining frequency & providing LR service Code of conduct Competitive 8
Future Design of Japan s Electricity Market Hydroelectric plant Thermal plant Nuclear power plant Wind farm,etc. companies JEPX Contract with retailer to sell electricity Transmission/ Distribution companies Regional monopoly, tariff regulation Wheeling contract 220-500kV 66-154kV 220-500kV Super high voltage substation 154-220kV Primary substation 220-500kV 154-220kV Substation for distribution 6.6kV 66kV Receive electricity from various power companies 6.6kV Transmission Distribution ers Not necessary to have assets 100/200V Meter Meter Meter Meter Meter contract with consumers Consumers Large factory Large building Building Medium factory Small factory Shop Household 9