Public Law 84-99 and Non-Structural Alternatives to Levee Repairs



Similar documents
Flood Risk Management

Flood Risk Management

Disaster Recovery Managing and Leveraging Multiple Funding Sources

Post-Flood Assessment

ALTERNATIVE SOURCES OF FUNDING FOR

US Army Corps of Engineers Authorities and Programs

Restoring and protecting natural floodplains reduces flood losses and benefits the environment. Photo: USDA NRCS.

Appendix A. Lists of Accomplishments and Project Costs. UMRWD 10 Year Plan Update. Appendix A UPPER MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED DISTRICT

PROJECT INFORMATION REPORT REHABILITATION OF FLOOD CONTROL WORKS ROCK CREEK LEVEE NAC Table of Contents

PUBLIC NOTICE Application for Permit

Appendix F Benefit-Cost Analysis of Flood Protection Measures

Rhode Island NRCS received approximately $2.4 million in ARRA funds to implement four floodplain easement projects.

- POLICY - Disaster Recovery Assistance Program

Sims Bayou Federal Flood Damage Reduction Project

A. Flood Management in Nevada

Chehalis River Basin Flood Damage Reduction Capital Budget Approved by Legislature in June 2013

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION. Lower Carmel River Floodplain Restoration and Enhancement Project

ESCAMBIA COUNTY FLOOD RECOVERY: 1- YEAR ANNIVERSARY REPORT

Wetlands in MN: Resource, Regulation, Restoration

Emergency Conservation Program

AN INITIATIVE TO IMPROVE

How to Become a Navy Engineer For $78,000 in USD

Henry Van Offelen Natural Resource Scientist MN Center for Environmental Advocacy

FINAL TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM AWD FLOWS THROUGH FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION AREA July 16, 2012

RE: Docket # COE ; ZRIN 0710 ZA05 Submitted via to NWP2012@usace.army.mil and Rulemaking Portal at

The Basics of Chapter 105 Waterways and Wetlands Permitting in PA

13. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION/ RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Applying HUD s Floodplain Management and Wetlands Protection Standards U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Environment and

Watershed Rehabilitation Program in Texas

Appendix D: Federal Agencies Hazard Mitigation Roles, Responsibilities, and Authorities

Available FSA and NRCS Disaster Assistance Programs Crop Insurance: Prevented Planting and Failed Acreage Considerations Click on title for video

What We Do: Wetlands, Wildlife Habitat & Flood Hazards in the Root River Watershed

PARTS [RESERVED] PART 203 EMERGENCY EMPLOY- MENT OF ARMY AND OTHER RE- SOURCES, NATURAL DISASTER PROCEDURES. Subpart A Introduction

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

Lower Raritan Watershed Management Area Stormwater & Flooding Subcommittee Strategy Worksheet LRSW-S3C1

US Army Corps of Engineers Los Angeles District. Rio Salado Oeste Salt River-Phoenix, Arizona FEASIBILITY REPORT SUMMARY

Swannanoa River Flood Risk Management Study

Implementing the Water Resources Development Act of 2007

ESRI_UC_2015_No843_Integrating Flood Risk Management and Salmon Habitat Restoration_CampbellSW

1. INTRODUCTION 5. THE PERMIT PROCESS

COMMUNITY CERTIFICATIONS

30 DAY PUBLIC NOTICE MAINTENANCE DREDGING OF THE FEDERAL NAVIGATION PROJECT IN COHASSET HARBOR COHASSET AND SCITUATE, MASSACHUSETTS

Development of Technical Data For Long Term Flood Solutions For the Red River Basin

INVENTORY OF FLOOD CONTROL AGENCIES

Flood System Repair Project

New Orleans Hurricane Storm Damage Risk Reduction System Tour March 23 24, 2012

Use: Cooperative farming as a habitat management tool to enhance and restore refuge grasslands

Why does Kittitas County want to form a Flood Control Zone District?

FLOOD PROTECTION BENEFITS

United States Army Corps of Engineers, Civil Works

Water Quality and Water Usage Surveys

DECISION DOCUMENT NATIONWIDE PERMIT 27

Release of EC USACE Process for the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Levee System Evaluation. Frequently Asked Questions

US Army Corps of Engineers Los Angeles District. Santa Cruz River, Paseo de las Iglesias Pima County, Arizona PROJECT SUMMARY

TRIBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM: Issues Relevant to Working with Native Americans and Alaska Natives on Section 203 Studies

30-DAY PUBLIC NOTICE CHELSEA RIVER, EAST BOSTON MASSACHUSETTS EMERGENCY STREAMBANK PROTECTION PROJECT

Section 401 Water Quality Certification

GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tulsa District

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS WASHINGTON, D.C

The answers to some of the following questions are separated into two major categories:

Emergency Streambank Restoration/Stabilization. Kentucky Division of Water Water Quality Certification May 2010 Educational Assistance

So far the effort, outlined in the state s Nutrient Reduction Strategy to reduce hypoxia in the Gulf, has been voluntary.

How To Manage Water Resources In The Yakima Basin

Why should communities invest in resiliency? What are the steps communities can take to become more resilient?

Flooding and Flood Threats on Trenton Island

National Operation and Maintenance Manual

Chapter 9. Selected Watershed Initiatives in the Great Basin Region

King County, Washington Policies and Practice for the Use of Eminent Domain For Flood Risk Reduction

How To Amend A Stormwater Ordinance

Urban Stream Restoration Defining the Full Benefits of a Project. Warren C. High MACTEC Engineering and Consulting

Ecological Mitigation Strategies

DALLAS FLOODWAY TIMELINE

3. The submittal shall include a proposed scope of work to confirm the provided project description;

Upper Des Plaines River & Tributaries, IL & WI Feasibility Study

SEC PURPOSE. SEC DEFINITIONS. SEC COLLABORATIVE FOREST LANDSCAPE RESTORATION PROGRAM.

Fiscal Year St. Lucie River Issues Team Surface Water Restoration Grant Package

Wildfire & Flash Flood Recovery Emergency Watershed Protection (EWP) Flood Mitigation Efforts April Fall 2013

Transcription:

Public Law 84-99 and Non-Structural Alternatives to Levee Repairs Presented by: Mr. Jerry A. Skalak, CFM U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Rock Island District and Mr. Tom Oswald Iowa Homeland Security and Emergency Management Division

We don t always see eye-to-eye! Free Tibet! We don t always see eye-to-eye!

Emergency Flood Control Funds Act of 1955 (Public Law 84-99) - codified in Section 701n of Title 33 of the United State Code (33 USC 701n) and promulgated in Part 208 of Title 33 of the Code of Federal Regulations (33 CFR 208) PL 84-99 Emergency Flood Protection Act of 1965, as amended, authorizes response before, during and after a disaster 99 The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers may provide assistance in the rehabilitation of flood control works projects only when repairs are clearly beyond the normal physical and financial capabilities of the project sponsor. Structures built for channel alignment, navigation, recreation, fish and wildlife, land reclamation drainage, interior drainage or to protect against land erosion are not flood control works and, therefore, are not eligible for assistance. Established eligibility criteria must also be met.

P.L. 84-99 eligible levees must Be a primary levee A primary levee is a complete unit, tied to high ground, designed for flood control Provide required minimum level of protection A 5-year level of protection for agriculture and 10-year level of protection for urban area. Have a public sponsor A public sponsor is required for other than a public entity. The sponsor must be a public agency such as a legal subdivision of a State or State government, local unit of government such as a county or city, a qualified Indian tribe or a state-chartered organization such as a levee board or district, drainage board or district. The sponsor will be required to co-sign an agreement for any assistance.

Benefits of being an active P.L. 84-99 levee Continuing technical support and assistance Annual and periodic inspections Preparation and upkeep of O&M Manual Inclusion in National Levee Database Post-flood event flood damage repairs or nonstructural alternative project implementation

Non-Structural Alternative Project Under the authority of PL 84-99, the Corps has the responsibility to identify and coordinate opportunities to implement non-structural alternatives to levee repairs with interested Federal, State, and local agencies following natural disaster events where flood control works are damaged. This is typically accomplished via an interagency levee work group or flood risk management team. The principle purposes of an NSAP are: floodplain restoration; provision or restoration of floodways; and/or reduction of future flood damages All systems considered eligible for PL 84-99 NSAP implementation have to be active in the Rehabilitation and Inspection Program (RIP) prior to the flood event. Corps expenditures for implementation of an NSAP are limited to the lesser of either the Federal share of rehabilitation costs or Federal share of computed benefits which would be derived from structural rehabilitation Exceptions to this cost cap policy may be requested from HQUSACE. A sponsor Cooperation Agreement or Memorandum of Agreement is required..

Benefit-to-Cost Ratio The BCR must be >1.0 for levee repairs to be approved; an NSAP can be implemented in lieu of repairs if requested by the sponsor If the BCR <1.0 then the Corps will only support the implementation of an NSAP Non-Federal public sponsor must submit a written request for an NSAP. The Corps will not be responsible for the operation, maintenance, or management of any NSAP implemented under the PL 84-99 authority The Corps may participate with one or more Federal agencies in implementing an NSAP.

Iowa River Port Louisa National Wildlife Refuge Lake Odessa Division Louisa County #11 Levee District Nonstructural Alternative Project (NSAP) Wapello Louisa County #11 Levee District Mississippi River Port Louisa National Wildlife Refuge Horseshoe Bend Division (formerly Louisa County #8 Levee District) Two Rivers Levee & Drainage District Iowa River

Calculating the BCR for Louisa County Levee District #11 Levee Repairs Following the 2008 Flood Event Estimate levee repair costs ($7.8 million) Determine flood frequencies (flood-stage exceedance probabilities) and seasonality of flooding Document active agricultural acres and cropping mix Calculate future crop damages and damages to residences and infrastructure associated with increased inundation Detour costs analysis Calculate average annual benefits/damages for with protection and withoutprotection conditions

Louisa County Levee District #11 Easements map Presenter Name Presenter Title Duty Location Date of Presentation US Army Corps of Engineers US Army Corp of Engineers BUILDING STRONG BUILDING STRONG

Louisa County Levee District #11 BCR Inputs

Alternatives No repairs to levee/repair roads (no betterments) Pros/cons No repairs to levee/elevate roads (road betterments) Pros/cons Repair upper beaches only/repair roads (no betterments) Pros/cons Repair all breaches/repair roads (no betterments) Pros/cons

Louisa County Levee District #11 NSAP Status Corps funded repair of upper levee breaches completed NRCS funded permanent easement acquisitions continuing FEMA funded residential buy outs or floodproofing measures completed

Green Island L&DD, Jackson County, IA Presenter Name Presenter Title Duty Location Date of Presentation US Army Corps of Engineers US Army Corp of Engineers BUILDING STRONG BUILDING STRONG

Presenter Name Presenter Title Duty Location Date of Presentation US Army Corps of Engineers US Army Corp of Engineers BUILDING STRONG BUILDING STRONG 19

Green Island Levee and Drainage District Jackson County, IA Confluence of Maquoketa and Mississippi Rivers Levee provided approximately 4% Annual Chance Exceedance (25 yr) protection to 1,363 acres of agricultural land and possibly several residential structures July 2010 flood event resulted in two major breaches Corps estimated cost to repair: $607,942 - Federal Cost: $506,742; Non-Federal Cost: $101,200 0.66:1 BCR

Annual Damages, Costs, and Benefit-to-Cost Action Total Estimated Cost for Structural Repair Site A-Levee Breach at Station 20+00 17,853 CY at $16.56/cy = $295,646 Site B-Levee Breach at Station 90+00 6,518 CY at $16.56/cy = $107,938 Subtotal Estimated Construction Amount $403,584 Contingency Amount (10%) : $40,358 Subtotal Estimated Construction Cost: $443,942 Construction Management**: $62,000 Total Estimated Construction Cost: $505,942 Planning, Engineering and Design**: $102,000 Total Project Cost: $607,942 * The cubic yard (cy) unit cost for each of the items listed in the cost estimate incorporates the mob/demob, seeding, and placement costs, where required, in addition to the primary earthwork repair costs for the respective Site on the levee. The Green Island levee protects approximately 1,363 acres of agricultural production land. 66 percent of the cropland is planted in corn, 20 percent is planted in soybeans, and 14 percent is planted in winter wheat Total Acreage value (1,363 acres x $4,000*) = $5,452,000 * 2007 Iowa Land Values report, Iowa State University Extension. Benefits for repairing the levee were derived by comparing the average annual damages with and without the repair project. The Green Island levee protects approximately 1,363 acres of agricultural production land. 66 percent of the cropland is planted in corn, 20 percent is planted in soybeans, and 14 percent is planted in winter wheat The undamaged Green Island levee provides a 25-year (4 percent frequency) design level of protection. The damaged levees provide no protection (flooding will occur with less than a 2-year (50 percent frequency event). Annual Damages Without Project: $60,700 Annual Damages With Project: $10,100 Total Annual Damages Prevented (Benefits): $50,600 Crop Damage Reduction: $50,600 Structural Damage Reduction: 0 Total Structural Repair Project Costs: $607,942 Annualized at 4-3/8%, 10-year period: $76,400 Benefit-to-Cost Ratio: 0.66

Green Island NSAP Outputs Acquisition of permanent easements on all affected lands Address possible extended ponding along Highway 52 embankment Wetland restoration on acquired lands Removal or floodproofing of affected residential structures Acquisition of residual value of easement lands and fee title transfer to IA DNR for management

Green Island NSAP Coordination

NSA Project sponsor - Limestone Bluffs Resource Conservation and Development Area (RC&D) Limestone Bluffs Resource Conservation and Development Area, Inc. (RC&D) is a 501 (c) (3) nonprofit corporation registered in the state of Iowa. The RC&D serves as the sponsor for many projects. The Limestone Bluffs RC&D has administered grants from variety of federal, state and private funding sources and conducts audits of organization funds.

Proposed non-structural project: Acquisition of permanent easements through NRCS Mississippi River Basin Healthy Watersheds Initiative (MRBI) and Wetlands Reserve Enhancement Program (WREP) Army Corps of Engineer s participation in NSA: $352,993 Corps NSA funding participation is 80 percent (non-federal levee system) of structural repair cost that would provide 1.0 B/C ratio Iowa Natural Heritage Foundation (restoration cost match) USFWS letter of support

NRCS Green Island Mississippi River Basin Healthy Watersheds Initiative (MRBI) Proposal

Green Island L&DD NSAP

Challenges Green Island L&DD BCR Corps repair cost estimate vs local estimates One land owner s preference vs others Repair permitting Property tax concerns Commodity prices Residual value acquisition Advantages of an NSAP Levee District rec d emergency assistance in 1970, 1973,1975, 1985, 1986, 1993, 2001, 2008 Permanently avoid future levee damages and cropland and possible residential flooding Floodplain wetlands restoration ecological benefits Proximity to existing IA DNR conservation area High potential for subsequent acquisition of residual value Quality of life benefits (e.g. Iowa ranks 49 th out of 50 States in per capita public land) Current status NRCS MRBI WREP funding received NRCS initiating acquisition of permanent easements Corps NSAP funding participation commitment Corps developing MOA with NRCS and IA DNR(?) Awaiting local decision on levee repair Levee repair borrow site permit appeal processing

Some Take Aways Authority provided by P.L. 84-99 to identify, evaluate, and implement nonstructural alternatives needs to be broadly communicated and fully utilized. Need to develop plans for nonstructural alternatives for all levee systems. Cumulative affects of land use changes, e.g. NRCS wetland easement acquisitions, on future levee repair B/C ratios need to be recognized. Need to apply a more rigorous and comprehensive B/C ratio calculation process for levee repair decisions Need to improve process to expedite easement acquisition funding for NSAPs Continuous coordination and communication at all levels and between all interests is invaluable!

Questions? Comments? It wasn t raining when Noah built the ark! Thank you.