Electron-Muon Ranger (EMR)



Similar documents
Electron-Muon Ranger (EMR)

Electron-Muon Ranger (EMR)

The accurate calibration of all detectors is crucial for the subsequent data

Image Processing Techniques applied to Liquid Argon Time Projection Chamber(LArTPC) Data

MICE detectors and first results. M. Bonesini Sezione INFN Milano Bicocca

Calorimetry in particle physics experiments

Evaluation Tools for the Performance of a NESTOR Test Detector

CMS Tracking Performance Results from early LHC Running

Neutron Detection Setups proposed for

ATLAS Test Beam Analysis in Stockholm: An Overview

ATLAS Tile Calorimeter Readout Electronics Upgrade Program for the High Luminosity LHC

CELL CYCLE BASICS. G0/1 = 1X S Phase G2/M = 2X DYE FLUORESCENCE

T(CR)3IC Testbed for Coherent Radio Cherenkov Radiation from Cosmic-Ray Induced Cascades

Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark in the l+ Jets Channel Using the Matrix Element Method

Energy Deposition in MICE Absorbers and Coils

Study of the B D* ℓ ν with the Partial Reconstruction Technique

Monte Carlo Simulations in Proton Dosimetry with Geant4

An option for the SHiP Muon Detector: Scintillator bars with WLS fibers and SiPMs readout

Jet Reconstruction in CMS using Charged Tracks only

THE DØ Luminosity Monitor (LM) consists of two array of

The Timing Counter of the MEG experiment: calibration and performances

07 - Cherenkov and transition radiation detectors

CHAPTER 6 PHOTON COUNTING

PoS(PhotoDet 2012)068

The Muon Veto DAQ. Florian Ritter. Kepler Center for Astro and Particle Physics. Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen

Introduction to CCDs and CCD Data Calibration

Measurement of Muon Lifetime and Mass Using Cosmic Ray Showers

ISTITUTO NAZIONALE DI FISICA NUCLEARE

CHAPTER 7 SCINTILLATION COUNTING

Proton tracking for medical imaging and dosimetry

Measurement of Neutralino Mass Differences with CMS in Dilepton Final States at the Benchmark Point LM9

π 0 γγ calibration Savrina Daria, ITEP, Moscow SINP MSU, Moscow Victor Egorychev, ITEP, Moscow Ivan Belyaev

Module 13 : Measurements on Fiber Optic Systems

Information about the T9 beam line and experimental facilities

AMS DAQ, TRD DSP Software

CELL CYCLE BASICS. G0/1 = 1X S Phase G2/M = 2X DYE FLUORESCENCE

Development of the electromagnetic calorimeter waveform digitizers for the Fermilab Muon g-2 experiment

CONFOCAL LASER SCANNING MICROSCOPY TUTORIAL

Performance Comparison of Four Commercial GE Discovery PET/CT Scanners: A Monte Carlo Study Using GATE

The data acquisition system of the XMASS experiment

Performance of the CMS cathode strip chambers with cosmic rays

Top rediscovery at ATLAS and CMS

Amptek Application Note XRF-1: XRF Spectra and Spectra Analysis Software By R.Redus, Chief Scientist, Amptek Inc, 2008.

Radiation Detection and Measurement

A.Besson, IPHC-Strasbourg

Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN (MAVEN) Mission

Flow Cytometry A Basic Overview

Testing thermo-acoustic sound generation in water with proton and laser beams

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. LAB 1 - Introduction to USRP

AN51 APPLICATION NOTE Revision 1

Introduction to the Monte Carlo method

Algorithms for digital γ-ray spectroscopy

GAMMA-RAY SPECTRA REFERENCES

Technical Bulletin. Threshold and Analysis of Small Particles on the BD Accuri C6 Flow Cytometer

Atomic and Nuclear Physics Laboratory (Physics 4780)

Cherenkov Detector with a Focusing Aerogel Radiator

IMPROVEMENT OF JET ENERGY RESOLUTION FOR SEGMENTED HCAL USING LAYER WEIGHTING TECHNIQUE

Biasing. 7 th FLUKA Course NEA Paris, Sept.29-Oct.3, 2008

Status of NectarCAM camera project. J-F. Glicenstein (IRFU) for the NectarCAM consortium

Truly digital PET imaging

Theory versus Experiment. Prof. Jorgen D Hondt Vrije Universiteit Brussel jodhondt@vub.ac.be

Solid State Detectors = Semi-Conductor based Detectors

Radiation Hard Sensor Materials for the CMS Tracker Upgrade The CMS HPK Campaign

Tracking systems in HEP:

arxiv:physics/ v1 [physics.ins-det] 6 Nov 1998

Timing Errors and Jitter

Tutorial 4.6 Gamma Spectrum Analysis

Calculating particle properties of a wave

Precision Tracking Test Beams at the DESY-II Synchrotron. Simon Spannagel DPG 2014 T88.7 Mainz,

pco.edge 4.2 LT 0.8 electrons 2048 x 2048 pixel 40 fps :1 > 70 % pco. low noise high resolution high speed high dynamic range

Implications of CMS searches for the Constrained MSSM A Bayesian approach

Search for a correlation between HiSPARC cosmic-ray data and weather measurements

The OPERA Emulsions. Jan Lenkeit. Hamburg Student Seminar, 12 June Institut für Experimentalphysik Forschungsgruppe Neutrinophysik

Real Time Tracking with ATLAS Silicon Detectors and its Applications to Beauty Hadron Physics

Tracking/Vertexing/BeamSpot/b-tag Results from First Collisions (TRK )

Spike-Based Sensing and Processing: What are spikes good for? John G. Harris Electrical and Computer Engineering Dept

Zeiss 780 Training Notes

Single photon detection with H8500 MAPMTs for the CBM RICH detector*

CMS Tracker module / hybrid tests and DAQ development for the HL-LHC

JCAT Project: Monte Carlo Internal Charging Tool(MCICT) status report. Fan Lei (RadMod) & David Rodgers (ESA)

Febex Data Acquisition System

Transcription:

Electron-Muon Ranger (EMR) Digitization and Reconstruction François Drielsma Ruslan Asfandiyarov University of Geneva On Behalf of the EMR Group 38 th MICE Collaboration Meeting February 23, 2014 Electron-Muon Ranger (EMR), University of Geneva 38 th MICE Collaboration Meeting, February 23, 2014 1 / 22

Digitization Scheme Electron-Muon Ranger (EMR), University of Geneva 38 th MICE Collaboration Meeting, February 23, 2014 2 / 22

Digitization Procedure All digitization parameters are preliminary 1 convert energy given by Geant4 into the number of scintillation photons (nsph): 2000 photos/mev 2 sample nsph with Poisson distribution 3 covert nsph to the number of trapped photons (ntph): trapping efficiency 2% 4 sample ntph with Poisson distribution 64-ch. PMT - bar readout 6 reduce ntph according to the length of wavelength shifting fiber (WLSf) and clear fiber (CLf) (naph): WLSf - 2.0 db/m, CLf - 0.35 db/m 7 apply channel attenuation map: ight loss in connectors up to 30% 8 sample naph with Poisson distribution 9 convert naph to the number of photoelectrons (npe): PMT quantum efficiency - 20% 10 sample npe with Poisson distribution 11 correct npe for photocathode non-uniformity: up to 40% 12 convert npe to the number of ADC counts: 8 ADC/npe 13 simulate electronics response: gaussian smearing - width 10 ADC 14 convert nadc to TOT: nadc=a+b*log(tot/c+d) 15 covnert geant4 time to ADC counts (deltat): 2.5ns/ADC 16 sample deltat with Gaussian distribution: width - 2 ADC 1-ch. PMT - plane readout 6 reduce ntph according to the length of wavelength shifting fiber (WLSf) and clear fiber (CLf) (naph): WLSf - 2.0 db/m, CLf - 0.35 db/m 7 apply channel attenuation map: ight loss in connectors up to 30% 8 sample naph with Poisson distribution 9 convert naph to the number of photoelectrons (npe): PMT quantum efficiency - 14.5% 10 sample npe with Poisson distribution 11 correct npe for photocathode non-uniformity: up to 50% 12 convert npe to the number of ADC counts: 1 ADC/npe 13 simulate electronics response: gaussian smearing - width 6.5 ADC 14 set signal baseline (8bit ADC):130 ADC 15 simulate noise level - number of fluctuations within acquisition window: from 0 to 200 16 set noise position: upwards/downwards fluctuations 17 simulate negative voltage pulse with random noise Electron-Muon Ranger (EMR), University of Geneva 38 th MICE Collaboration Meeting, February 23, 2014 3 / 22

Digitization: MC Raw! MC Digitized Total Charge Per Plane 3 GeV muons simulated (to be compared with cosmics) left plot: energy deposition per plane in MeV right plot: digitized energy after electronics conversion - total charge per plane in ADC counts Electron-Muon Ranger (EMR), University of Geneva 38 th MICE Collaboration Meeting, February 23, 2014 4 / 22

Digitization: MC Digitized! Cosmics Total Charge Per Plane 3 GeV muons simulated (to be compared with cosmics) left plot: digitized energy after electronics conversion - total charge per plane in ADC counts right plot: total charge per plane from cosmic muons even with peliminary digitization parameters the agreement is very good Electron-Muon Ranger (EMR), University of Geneva 38 th MICE Collaboration Meeting, February 23, 2014 5 / 22

Digitization: MC Raw! MC Digitized Time Over Threshold 3 GeV muons simulated (to be compared with cosmics) left plot: energy deposition per bar in MeV right plot: digitized energy after electronics conversion - time over threshold measurement per bar in ADC counts Electron-Muon Ranger (EMR), University of Geneva 38 th MICE Collaboration Meeting, February 23, 2014 6 / 22

Digitization: MC Digitized! Cosmics Time Over Threshold 3 GeV muons simulated (to be compared with cosmics) left plot: digitized energy after electronics conversion - time over threshold measurement per bar in ADC counts right plot: time over threshold measurement per bar from cosmic muons even with peliminary digitization parameters the agreement is very good peak around 15 present in both Monte Carlo and data. no explanation so far Electron-Muon Ranger (EMR), University of Geneva 38 th MICE Collaboration Meeting, February 23, 2014 7 / 22

Digitization: MC Digitized! Cosmics Pulse Shape 3 GeV muons simulated (to be compared with cosmics) left plot: digitized energy converted into negative voltage (sampled with Landau distribution) pulse with random noise right plot: real ADC pulse from cosmics even with peliminary digitization parameters the agreement is very good Electron-Muon Ranger (EMR), University of Geneva 38 th MICE Collaboration Meeting, February 23, 2014 8 / 22

Monte Carlo Raw 260 MeV muon all energy depositions are visible Electron-Muon Ranger (EMR), University of Geneva 38 th MICE Collaboration Meeting, February 23, 2014 9 / 22

Digitized Monte Carlo 260 MeV muon only significant energy depositions are visible signals are smeared or even lost sometimes (due to statistical fluctuations) Electron-Muon Ranger (EMR), University of Geneva 38 th MICE Collaboration Meeting, February 23, 2014 10 / 22

Reconstruction: Timing Analysis event cleaning: selection of primary particles (associated to triggers) noise rejection decay particles selection primary particles are saved in separate events noise events are grouped in one event all the rest are in the last event: decay particles cosmic muons Electron-Muon Ranger (EMR), University of Geneva 38 th MICE Collaboration Meeting, February 23, 2014 11 / 22

Track Reconstruction Raw Track after cleaning event is ready for track reconstruction Electron-Muon Ranger (EMR), University of Geneva 38 th MICE Collaboration Meeting, February 23, 2014 12 / 22

Track Reconstruction Raw Track primary and secondary tracks are easily identified Electron-Muon Ranger (EMR), University of Geneva 38 th MICE Collaboration Meeting, February 23, 2014 13 / 22

Track Reconstruction Primary Particle track is not a regular line fitted with a piecewise linear function XZ and YZ projections fitted separatly length of 3D track defines a range Electron-Muon Ranger (EMR), University of Geneva 38 th MICE Collaboration Meeting, February 23, 2014 14 / 22

Track Reconstruction Secondary Particle track is not a regular line fitted with a piecewise linear function XZ and YZ projections fitted separatly length of 3D track defines a range Electron-Muon Ranger (EMR), University of Geneva 38 th MICE Collaboration Meeting, February 23, 2014 15 / 22

Track Reconstruction 3D Track an end point of the secondary track should match an end point of a primary one presence of secondary track is an additional discriminating variable reconstructed variables: range (function of momentum) secondary tracks total charge ratio of charge in the second part of the track over the first one (>1 for muons and pions, 1 for electrons) all the above variables contribute to PID and momentum identification This algorithm is being implemented... Electron-Muon Ranger (EMR), University of Geneva 38 th MICE Collaboration Meeting, February 23, 2014 16 / 22

High Energy Cosmics Electron-Muon Ranger (EMR), University of Geneva 38 th MICE Collaboration Meeting, February 23, 2014 17 / 22

High Energy Cosmics Electron-Muon Ranger (EMR), University of Geneva 38 th MICE Collaboration Meeting, February 23, 2014 18 / 22

High Energy Cosmics Electron-Muon Ranger (EMR), University of Geneva 38 th MICE Collaboration Meeting, February 23, 2014 19 / 22

High Energy Cosmics Electron-Muon Ranger (EMR), University of Geneva 38 th MICE Collaboration Meeting, February 23, 2014 20 / 22

High Energy Cosmics Electron-Muon Ranger (EMR), University of Geneva 38 th MICE Collaboration Meeting, February 23, 2014 21 / 22

Summary digitization of geant4 simulation is implemented both electronics chains are simulated (64-ch. and 1-ch. PMT readouts including FEB/DBB and fadc boards) even with preliminary digitization parameters an agreement between simulation and data is exceptional digitization parameters will be studies/measured/tuned to match real hardware reconstruction is being implemented... Electron-Muon Ranger (EMR), University of Geneva 38 th MICE Collaboration Meeting, February 23, 2014 22 / 22