Protected Bicycle Lanes in NYC



Similar documents
Measuring the Street:

Bicycle Crash Data 2013

Stone Way N Rechannelization: Before and After Study. N 34th Street to N 50th Street

Bicycle Crash Data 2012

BICYCLE TRENDS IN CAMBRIDGE

Traffic Information in NYC

Near Westside Neighborhood and University Avenue Corridor Transportation Study. Public Workshop #2. September 12 and 23, 2013

CYCLISTS INVOLVED IN ROAD CRASHES IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA

Safer Streets for New York City

N Street Protected Bikeway

BIKEWAY TYPOLOGIES COMPLETE STREETS WORKSHOP JULY John Cock, Principal/Planner Alta Planning + Design

12MAP-21, a funding and authorization bill to govern U.S. federal surface MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE

Where Do We Want to Go? How Can We Get There?

REGIONAL NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION NETWORK

Comprehensive Mobility Project Development Process Capital Metro ¼-Cent Fund Analysis

2002 Kansas Traffic Accident Facts HOLIDAY STATISTICS. New Year's. Friday - Tuesday; 102-Hour Reporting Period. Accident Type 5-YEAR HISTORY

Why Do We Bike? And where, how, who, when, and with what

Florida Avenue Multimodal Transportation Study. June 19, 2013

A Bicycle Accident Study Using GIS Mapping and Analysis

Light Rail Transit in Phoenix

Pedestrian and Bicycle Crash Data Analysis:

Presentation to Community Task Force July 9, 2007

Harlem River Bridges Access Plan

SAN DIEGO - A BICYCLE FRIENDLY CITY

EPA Technical Assistance for Sustainable Communities Building Blocks

- FREE! - The Official San Francisco BIKE GUIDE. 1st Edition

New Jersey SRTS Travel Plan Guide

ELMHURST SPEEDWAY A STUDY OF LAWBREAKING IN ELMHURST

Technical Memorandum PERFORMANCE MEASURES. Prepared by:

Downtown Tampa Transportation Vision

Taxicab and Livery Crashes in New York City 2004

If You Build It : The Impact of Street Improvements on Commercial Office Space

North Avenue Corridor Study. Advisory Committee Meeting #5 June 11, 2014

Lincoln Downtown Master Plan Update

SAFE Streets for CHICAGO

TEST ON Driving Safely Among Bicyclists and Pedestrians

VISION ZERO YEAR ONE REPORT HEADER ONE YEAR REPORT

OVERVIEW PROJECT SUMMARY

Needs Analysis. Long Beach Bicycle Master Plan. Bicycle Commuter Needs. LONG BEACH BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Needs Analysis

Pilot Staff Bike Share Project. Induction Notes

Advantages and Disadvantages of One Way Streets October 30, 2007

Executive Summary. Transportation Needs CHAPTER. Existing Conditions

Crash Report Calendar Years 2003 through 2006 August 2007

Examples of Transportation Plan Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures

Principles of Road and Traffic Engineering Designs for Mixed Traffic Flow with a Numerous Motorcycles

Boston Traffic Management Center Activity Report for FY 2013 Real-time Traffic Signal Adjustments

Bicycle Crash Analysis 2001 thru 2005 Overview

Addendum to the Arterial Transitway Corridors Study

Bicyclist Fatalities and Serious Injuries in New York City


Trends and issues Lake Te Koutu walkway, Cambridge

Goals & Objectives. Chapter 9. Transportation

Safety Evidence for Bicycling

PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE ACCIDENT DATA. Irene Isaksson-Hellman If Insurance Company P&C Ltd.

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Final Long-Range Transportation Plan - Destination Attachment A

TRAFFIC SAFETY FACTS. Bicyclists and Other Cyclists Data

Context Sensitive Design for Urban Transportation in West Philadelphia

DOT HS April 2014

Riding with kids: a GIS approach to designing safe bicycle routes

Bike Accident Summary. Table 1 shows the number of bicycle accidents in Fort Collins from January 1, June 30, 2009.

College of Southern Maryland. Hughesville Transportation Study

RULES OF THE ROAD BY LWTL Staff Writer

Measuring Success: Transportation Improvements along Sandy Boulevard between NE 13 th and NE 47 th Avenues

Draft Non Transportation Performance Measures Including Related Qualitative Assessment of Example Sections

City of Rockville Regional Development Impacts: Transportation Capacity Analysis. June, 2013

ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS FOR DESIGNING YOUR SAFE ROUTES

Analysis Parameters. The Tucson Region (eastern Pima County) What is a Bicycle Crash? Annual Bicycle Crashes. Crashes and Population Growth

Appendix J Santa Monica Travel Demand Forecasting Model Trip Generation Rates

MISSOURI TRAFFIC SAFETY COMPENDIUM

30 Years of Smart Growth

Brookdale Site. CB6 Update April 1, 2015

Bicycle Safety Enforcement Action Guidelines

The Effects of Bicycle and pedestrian Crashes From

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the City Budget Forecast estimates that housing

What happens when walkers and cyclists share the space?

DESIGN ASSISTANCE APPLICATION

Memorial Day Holiday Period Traffic Fatality Estimate, 2015

How To Be Safe

HIGHWAY DESIGN REPORT. Appendix 4. Proposed Design Principles for City Passings

The Economic Impact of Motor Vehicle Crashes Involving Pedestrians and Bicyclists

CITY OF ROANOKE AND TOWN OF VINTON, VIRGINIA. RSTP Funds Joint Application FOR

Traffic Safety Facts 2008 Data

How To Know The Laws Of A Bike Ride In California

SUMMARY OF GROWTH & DEVELOPMENT TRENDS For THE CENTRAL AREA OF CHICAGO. The Parking Industry Labor Management Committee (PILMC)

9988 REDWOOD AVENUE PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. April 24, 2015

Bicycle riding is a great way to get into shape

Children and road safety: a guide for parents

Bob Wachtel BOB: Jim Nugent Monday, November 28, :49 PM 'Bob Wachtel' From: Sent: To: Cc:

WYDOT Quick Facts TRAFFIC SIGNALS

Why Bike-Friendly Cities are Safer for all Road Users

Nearly 38,000 vehicles cross the Shinnecock Canal on Sunrise Highway (NYS Route 27) daily, during peak summer months.

Cycling Promotion and Cycling Safety: Is there a conflict? C.Woolsgrove *

Best Practices in Bicycle and Pedestrian Wayfinding in the Washington Region Survey Results

FMCSA Webinar Nov.18th to Examine Large Truck Crash Fatalities Involving Pedestrians & Bicyclists. New Technology for Better Fleet Management

Bicycle Collisions in Indiana

Proposed Service Design Guidelines

Research on cycling infrastructure in Copenhagen

A Guide to Safe Bicycling in Hawai i

Traffic Safety Initiatives in Tampa Bay Florida Department of Transportation District Seven Tampa Bay

Smart Cycling IN SANTA MONICA SANTA MONICA POLICE DEPARTMENT BE SMART. BE VISIBLE. BE ATTENTIVE. HAVE FUN!

Transcription:

Protected Bicycle Lanes in NYC New York City Department of Transportation Polly Trottenberg, Commissioner September 2014 NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1

Overview Since 2007, the New York City Department of Transportation has installed over 30 miles of protected bicycle lanes throughout the city, including several parking protected bicycle lanes on various avenues in Manhattan. The following report contains an analysis of how some of these Manhattan routes have impacted safety, mobility, and economic vitality. Routes were chosen for inclusion if they had at least three years of after safety data available. Safety Crashes with injuries have been reduced by 17% Pedestrian injuries are down by 22% Cyclist injuries show a minor decrease even as bicycle volumes have dramatically increased Total injuries have dropped by 20% 74% decrease in average risk of a serious injury to cyclists from 2001 to 2013 Cyclist injury risk has generally decreased on protected bicycle lane corridors within this study as cyclist volumes rise and cyclist injures decrease Mobility Travel speeds in the Central Business District have remained steady as protected bicycle lanes are added to the roadway network Travel times on Columbus Avenue have improved while vehicle volumes are maintained First Avenue travel speeds remained level through project area Travel times on 8 th Avenue improved by an average of 14% Economic Vitality & Quality of Life When compared to similar corridors streets that received a protected bicycle lane saw a greater increase in retail sales 110 trees have been added to projects within this study area, enhancing the neighborhood through which they run Crossing distances along corridors have been shortened anywhere between 17 and 30 NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2

Overview Non-Typical Center Lanes Side Lanes Lanes at Complex Intersections Shared Protected Lanes NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 3

Overview Typical: One-way Manhattan Avenues NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 4

Overview 7 miles of typical one-way avenue protected bicycle lanes now over 3 years old 12 projects on six avenues Install Year Corridor (Segments) 2007 9th Avenue (16th-23rd) 2008 9th Avenue (23rd-31st) 2008 8th Avenue (Bank-14th) 2009 8th Avenue (14th-23rd) 2009 Broadway (59-47) 2009 Broadway (33-26) 2010 1st Avenue (H-34) 2010 2nd Avenue (2-14) 2010 2nd Avenue (23-32) 2010 8th Avenue (23-34) 2010 Broadway (23-18) 2010/11 Columbus Avenue (96-77) The following corridor analysis includes all portions of each corridor that received the protected bicycle lane treatment. Any portion of the corridor that did not receive the treatment was left out even if it received other upgrades at the same time. Analysis includes segments that have three years of after data. NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 5

Overview - Design Design of each protected bicycle lane looks similar but there are important distinctions when compared to condition Lane Removal (Y/N) Lane Narrowing (Y/N) Pre-Existing Basic or Buffered Bike Lane Remove or Curbside Rush Hour Vehicle Lane Major network change (Y/N) Differences in Final Designs All Split-Phase Signals vs Primarily Mixing Zones Includes Bus Lane Concrete vs Painted Pedestrian Islands NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 6

1. Safety 3yr Data Number of Injuries 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 8 th Avenue -17% 514 426 Crashes with Injuries Protected Bicycle Lanes with 3 yrs of Data: vs -25% 221 166 MV Occupant Injuries -22% 280 220 Pedestrian Injuries -2% 100 98 Cyclist Injuries -20% 601 484 Total Injuries Looking at all corridors combined with at least three years of after data, we find that: Crashes with injuries have been reduced by 17% Pedestrian injuries are down by 22% Cyclist injuries show a minor improvement even as bicycle volumes have dramatically increased Total injuries have dropped by 20% Protected bicycle lane projects with 3 years of after data include the following: 9 th Ave (16 th -31 st ), 8 th Ave (Bank-23 rd, 23 rd -34 th ), Broadway (59 th -47 th, 33 rd -26 th, 23 rd -18 th ), 1 st Avenue (Houston to 34 th ), 2 nd Ave (Houston-34 th ), Columbus Ave (96 th -77 th ) Note: Only sections of projects that included protected bicycle lanes were analyzed Source: NYPD AIS/TAMS Crash Database NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 7

1. Safety NYC Cycling Risk 74% decrease in average risk of a serious injury to cyclists from 2001 to 2013 The New York City Cycling Risk Indicator is calculated as the number of bicyclists killed or severely injured in motor vehicle traffic crashes, divided by the NYC In-Season Cycling Indicator, multiplied by 100. New York City Cycling Risk as of 8/14/2014* In-Season Cycling Indicator Cycling Risk Indicator Sources: NYC In-Season Cycling Indicator. The Indicator is based on weekday 12-hour counts taken between April and October at 6 key cycling locations, indexed to the year 2000 count: http://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/downloads/pdf/2013-nyc-cycling-in-the-city.pdf Bicyclist fatalities: NYCDOT-NYPD Reconciled Traffic Fatality Database Bicyclist severe injuries: NYSDOT SIMS/ALIS Crash Database (as of 8/14/14) Type A injuries reported in crashes involving bicycles. NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 8 * Preliminary Results - final numbers are subject to change

1. Safety Individual Project Risk Cyclist injury risk has generally decreased on protected bicycle lane corridors within this study as cyclist volume rises and cyclist injuries decrease Project Corridor Miles Cyclist Risk Change 9th Avenue (16th-23rd) 0.33-64.9% Broadway (59th-47th) 0.60-36.4% 1st Avenue (1st-34th) 1.62-53.9% 2nd Avenue (2nd-14th) 0.59-43.8% 2nd Avenue (23rd-34th) 0.54-54.1% 8th Avenue (23rd-34th) 0.54-2.4% Broadway (23rd-18th) 0.25 11.2% Columbus Avenue (96th-77th) 0.96-37.6% For volume and safety details for each of the above corridors see appendix The cyclist risk measure was calculated as a relative rate of injury per cyclist during the 3-year before period and the 3-year after period. To generate the cyclist risk measure, the number of injuries recorded in the project area over the entire investigation period was normalized by the number of cyclists measured on the facility over a 12-hour period representative of April-October cycling conditions. The percent change of the cyclist risk measure between the before period and the after period provides the effect of the individual NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 9 project on the cyclist risk of injury. See individual project slides in appendix for data sources. 9

2. Mobility Central Business District Travel speeds in the Central Business District have remained steady as protected bicycle lanes are added to the roadway network Weekday Manhattan CBD Taxi Speeds 8:00a-6:00p Between 2009 and 2012 Manhattan saw a 9% increase in private sector jobs, with increases projected to continue Note: CBD includes all projects in study except Columbus Avenue Source: NYC TLC Data includes all weekday yellow taxi trips from 8am-6pm taken in the Manhattan CBD (from Bowling Green to 59th St, river to river), excludes New Year s Day, Memorial NEW YORK Day, CITY Independence DEPARTMENT Day, OF Labor TRANSPORTATION Day, Thanksgiving and Christmas. 10 Job Data Source: NYC Economic Development Corporation

Average Weekday Vehicle Volume Protected Bicycle Lane Analysis 2. Mobility Columbus Avenue 5-6 am 6-7 am 7-8 am 8-9 am 9-10 am 10-11 am 11 am -12 pm 12-1pm 1-2 pm 2-3 pm 3-4 pm 4-5 pm 5-6 pm 6-7 pm 7-8 pm 8-9 pm 9-10 pm 10-11 pm 11 pm -12 am Travel times on Columbus Avenue have improved while vehicle volumes are maintained 1400 Vehicle Volumes (Columbus Ave, W 96 St to W 95 St) 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 AM Peak Average Travel Time (Columbus Ave, W 96 St to W 77 St, 7:00a 10:00a) 4.38 3.00-35% Note: volume data collected June 4-10, 2010. data collected February 23- March 1, 2011. travel times collected July 25, 2010. data collected July 19, 2011. Results are average travel times between 7:00a and 10:00a, 2 runs per hour. NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 Travel Time (minutes.seconds) 11

2. Mobility First Avenue First Avenue travel speeds remained level through project area 18.0 Average Weekday Taxi Speeds, 9am-4pm 16.0 BIKE FACILITIES INSTALLED 2010 14.0 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 14th St - 23rd St 23rd St - 34th St 34th St - 40th St 40th St - 59th St 11/2009 11/2010 Source: NYC TLC All weekday trips taken where at least 80% of trip was on stated route. Weekdays 9a-4p, November 2009 vs November 2010 NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 12

2. Mobility Eighth Avenue Travel Time Travel times on 8 th Avenue improved post-implementation by an average of 14% 7:12 Weekday Travel Times (Eighth Ave, W 23 St to W 34 St) 6:00 6:01-21% 4:48 3:36 2:24 2:47-13% 2:25 4:44 3:38-13% 3:10 4:20-14% 3:43 1:12 8 th Avenue 0:00 AM Peak Average (7am - 10am) Mid-day Average (10am - 2pm) PM Peak Average (4pm - 7pm) Daily Average (7am - 8pm) data collected September 30 to October 1, 2009 and October 6 to October 8, 2009. data collected November 16 to November 18, 2010. NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 13

3. Economic Impact Retail Sales % Increase in Sales When compared to similar corridors streets that received a protected bicycle lane saw a greater increase in retail sales 50% 40% 47% Change in Sales Percent Increase in Combined Sales vs 2-Year Construction 43% Project Area Comparison Site 1 Comparison Site 2 30% 20% 23% 20% 10% 12% 9% 0% 9th Ave (W 23- W 31st Sts) Columbus Ave (W 77- W 96 Sts) Source: NYC DOT (December 2013), The Economic Benefits of Sustainable Streets. 9 th Ave Comparison Site 1 = 10 th Ave (16-26 Sts), Comparison Site 2 = 7 th Ave (16-23 Sts). Columbus Ave Comparison Site 1 = Amsterdam Ave (77-96 Sts), Comparison Site 2 = Columbus Ave (70-77 Sts). NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 14

3. Quality of Life 110 trees have been added to projects within this study area, enhancing the neighborhoods through which they run Crossing distances shortened anywhere between 17 and 30 NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 15

Design 2 nd Avenue (14 th Street to 23 rd Street) : Four moving lanes, standard curbside bus lane 2010: Four moving lanes, curbside buffered bike lane, upgraded bus-only lane 2013: Three moving lanes, parking protected bicycle lane, refurbished bus lanes NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION The Evolution of a Parking Protected Bicycle Lane

Design 2 nd Avenue (14 th Street to 23 rd Street) Reduction of vehicle volumes as users apparently shifted to other modes allowed for the 2013 upgrade: AM vehicle volumes (-11.8%) PM vehicle volumes (-15.3%) M15 Bus Ridership (+9%) NEW YORK Bicycle CITY DEPARTMENT Volumes OF TRANSPORTATION (+60%)

Design 2 nd Avenue (14 th Street to 23 rd Street) Final Design Elements Parking protected Mixing zones Painted pedestrian safety islands Bus only red lanes Bus only overhead guide signs Painted pedestrian safety islands provide flexibility for maintenance and constructability NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Appendix NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 19

9 th Avenue (16 th Street to 23 rd Street) 70 wide No Pre-Existing Bike Lane Lane Removal; Lane Narrowing Split Phase Signals at All Turning Conflicts Crashes w/ Injuries -48% Bike Volume +65% Left turn signal phase with bike signal on 9 th Avenue Crash Data Source: NYPD AIS/TAMS Crash Database NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Count Data: 9 th Ave btwn 18 th and 19 th St, average of before vs after 12 hour counts taken between April and October 20

9 th Avenue (23 rd Street to 31 st Street) 70 wide No Pre-Existing Bike Lane Lane Removal Split Phase Signals at All Turning Conflicts Crashes w/ Injuries -43% Left turn signal phase with bike signal on 9 th Avenue NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 21 Crash Data Source: NYPD AIS/TAMS Crash Database

8 th Avenue (Bank Street to 14 th Street) 56 wide Pre-Existing Buffered Bike Lane No Lane Removal; No Lane Narrowing Split Phase Signals at All Turning Conflicts Crashes w/ Injuries -4% 8 th Avenue at Bleecker Street NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Crash Data Source: NYPD AIS/TAMS Crash Database 22

8 th Avenue (14 th Street to 23 rd Street) 70 wide Pre-Existing Buffered Bike Lane Part-Time Lane Removal; Lane Narrowing Split Phase Signals at All Turning Conflicts Crashes w/ Injuries -20% 8 th Avenue at 19 th Street NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Crash Data Source: NYPD AIS/TAMS Crash Database 23

8 th Avenue (23 rd Street to 34 th Street) 70 wide Pre-Existing Bike Lane No Lane Removal; Lane Narrowing Primarily Mixing Zones Crashes w/ Injuries -2% Bicycle Volumes +9% 8 th Avenue at 26 th Street Crash Data Source: NYPD AIS/TAMS Crash Database NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Count Data: 8 th Ave btwn 28 th and 29 th St, average of before vs after 12 hour counts taken between April and October 24

1 st Avenue (1 st Street to 34 th Street) 70 wide No Pre-Existing Bike Lane Lane Removal Primarily Mixing Zones Exterior Bus Lane Crashes w/ Injuries -7% Bicycle Volumes +160% 1 st Avenue at 6 th Street Crash Data Source: NYPD AIS/TAMS Crash Database NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Count Data: 1 st Ave btwn St Marks Pl and 9 th St, average of before vs after 12 hour counts taken between April and October 25

Columbus Avenue (96 th Street to 77 th Street) 60 Wide No Pre-Existing Bike Lane No Lane Removal; Lane Narrowing Primarily Mixing Zones Crashes w/ Injuries -27% Bicycle Volume +51% Mixing zone on Columbus Avenue Crash Data Source: NYPD AIS/TAMS Crash Database NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Count Data: Columbus Ave btwn 90 th and 91 st St, average of before vs after 12 hour counts taken between April and October 26

2 nd Avenue (2 nd Street to 14 th Street) 57 Wide Pre-Existing Bike Lane Lane Removal Primarily Mixing Zones Exterior Bus Lanes Crashes w/ Injuries -4% Bicycle Volume +49% 2 nd Avenue at 10 th Street Crash Data Source: NYPD AIS/TAMS Crash Database NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Count Data: 2nd Ave btwn St Marks Pl and 9 th St, average of before vs after 12 hour counts taken between April and October 27

2 nd Avenue (23 rd Street to 34 th Street) 70 Wide No Pre-Existing Bike Lane Lane Removal; Lane Narrowing Primarily Mixing Zones Upgraded Exterior Bus Lane Crashes w/ Injuries -7% Bicycle Volumes +60% 2 nd Avenue at 28 th Street Crash Data Source: NYPD AIS/TAMS Crash Database NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Count Data: 2 nd Ave btwn 22 nd and 21 st St, average of before vs after 12 hour counts taken between April and October 28

Broadway (47 th Street to 59 th Street) 59 Wide Pre-Existing Bike Lane Lane Removal Split Phase Signals at All Turning Conflicts Major Traffic Network Change Crashes w/ Injuries -18% Bicycle Volume +108% Broadway Crash Data Source: NYPD AIS/TAMS Crash Database NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Count Data: Broadway btwn 50 th St and 51 st St, average of before vs after 12 hour counts taken between April and October 29

Broadway (26 th Street to 33 rd Street) 41 Wide Pre-Existing Bike Lane Lane Removal Split Phase Signals at All Turning Conflicts Major Traffic Network Change Crashes w/ Injuries -45% Broadway at 29 th Street Crash Data Source: NYPD AIS/TAMS Crash Database NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 30

Broadway (18 th Street to 23 rd Street) 44 Wide Pre-Existing Bike Lane Lane Removal Primarily Mixing Zones Major Traffic Network Change Crashes w/ Injuries -33% Bicycle Volume +28% Broadway at 20 th Street Crash Data Source: NYPD AIS/TAMS Crash Database NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Count Data: Broadway btwn 18 th and 19 th St, average of before vs after 12 hour counts taken between April and October 31