2001 National Name Exchange



Similar documents
How To Rank A Graduate School

By Brian L. Yoder, Ph.D.

UC AND THE NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL RATINGS OF GRADUATE PROGRAMS

By Brian L. Yoder, Ph.D.

in the Rankings U.S. News & World Report

Doctoral Programs in Communication: Updated Report for Graduates

US News & World Report Graduate Program Comparison Year ranking was published

Q2 Which university will you be attending? American University (366) Arizona State University (367) Boston University (368) Brown University (439)

in the Rankings U.S. News & World Report

How To Get Into A University

in the Rankings U.S. News & World Report

BENCHMARKING UNIVERSITY ADVANCEMENT PERFORMANCE

Psychology NRC Study R Rankings (1 of 6)

Psychology NRC Study S Rankings (1 of 6)

By Brian L. Yoder, Ph.D.

Demographic Trends of Engineering Students

UCLA in the Rankings. U.S. News & World Report

DISCUSSION ITEM ANNUAL REPORT ON NEWLY APPROVED INDIRECT COSTS AND DISCUSSION OF THE RECOVERY OF INDIRECT COSTS FROM RESEARCH BACKGROUND

U.S. News & World Report

Summary of Doctoral Degree Programs in Philosophy

US News & World Report Undergraduate Rankings. Updated 09/08/2014

SUMMARY OF 2015 ANNUAL REPORTS SUBMITTED TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL ACCREDITATION BOARD BY ACCREDITED ACADEMIC PROGRAMS

BEST PRACTICES FOR BUSINESS SCHOOLS TO LEAD IN EXPANDING OPPORTUNTIES FOR WOMEN IN BUSINESS AND TO ADAPT TO THE 21 ST -CENTURY WORKFORCE

NUMBERS. Engineering degrees increased at all levels THE YEAR IN BY MICHAEL T. GIBBONS

Test Requirements at Top Colleges

Graduate Programs Applicant Report 2011

27.9% of the graduates responded. Respondents. Degree Surveys with Salaries Male Average Female Average. Table of Contents

Graduate School Rankings By U.S. News & World Report: ACCOUNTING PROGRAMS

UNIVERSITY TOP 50 BY SUBJECTS a) Arts and Humanities Universities

Academic and Professional Degree Students

University Your selection: 169 universities

National Bureau for Academic Accreditation And Education Quality Assurance LINGUISTICS # UNIVERSITY CITY STATE DEGREE MAJOR SPECIALTY RESTRICTION

UMBC. A University On The Move

Summary of Doctoral Degree Programs in Philosophy

Frequently Asked Questions

Universities classified as "very high research activity"

Realization of Your Dream: Higher Study, Partnership, Collaboration Opportunities

Table 1. focus on Physics Graduate Degrees. Page 2. Number of Physics Departments with Graduate Programs, Academic Year

US News & World Report Best Undergraduate Engineering Programs: Specialty Rankings 2014 Rankings Published in September 2013

Trends in Doctorate Recipients

Progression Toward the PhD Lessons from The Leadership Alliance

A Data Based Assessment of Research Doctorate Programs in the United States

Celebrating Partnerships: 2015 NACME Continuum Meeting

Enhancing Educational Attainment in Arizona

College of Liberal Arts, Cohorts: Placement of PhD Holders

Graduate School Admission Data from UW's Graduates (as self-reported in January 2012)

Saint Francis Medical Center College of Nursing Peoria, Illinois. Doctor of Nursing Practice. Application for Admission

The Summer Research Early Identification Program SR-EIP

Home Colleges Grad Schools High Schools Online Programs Community Colleges Glob

Evaluating the Top-50 Graduate Programs in Chemistry A New, Comprehensive Ranking by David Fraley that includes the Top-10 Listings in 7 Specialties

Mike Proctor, J.D. April 15, 2014

COLLEGE / COMMON APPLICATION SPECIFIC NOTES:

GrantsNet (for training in the biomedical sciences and undergraduate science education)

TOURNAMENT RESULTS 1 N A T I O N A L I N T R A M U R A L - R E C R E A T I O N A L S P O R T S A S S O C I A T I O N

Graduate School Rankings By U.S. News & World Report: MARKETING PROGRAMS

SR-EIP. The Summer Research Early Identification Program. The Leadership Alliance National Symposium. Associate Member. Member Institutions

Chapter 3 Undergraduate Students: Affordability

Admission to US Universities. College-Ready in a Competitive Context

A Guide to Graduate Study in Economics: Ranking Economics Departments by Fields of Expertise

Census Data on Uninsured Women and Children September 2009

Washington State Association Of School Psychologists. MINORITY SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM (2015) for Graduate Training in School Psychology

Faculty Council on Retirement, Insurance, and Benefits Dependent Tuition Benefit Proposal October 2004

Graduate School Rankings By U.S. News & World Report: PSYCHOLOGY (RESEARCH) - Ph.D.

Tufts University Senior Survey 2010 Graduate Schools by Major Report

Medical School Math Requirements and Recommendations

TIER ONE. Our Goal: To Become a Major, Nationally Competitive ( Tier One ) Research University

BenefitsMonitor National Higher Education Participants. Mercer Health & Benefits 20

Text table 4-1 Enrollment, degree attainment, and employment status of academic year 1996/97 and 1997/98 S&E bachelor s degree recipients: April 1999

Master of Science in Nursing

Prof. Elizabeth Raymond Department of Chemistry Western Washington University

CIC International Student Census Open Doors Survey Fall 2011 Enrolled Students

NIH 2009* Total $ Awarded. NIH 2009 Rank

College Admissions Deadlines

SCHOOL SCHOOL S WEB ADDRESS. HOURS Tempe Arizona Ph.D January 15 $60 Not given 550/213

Using National Data in University Rankings and Comparisons

Public Health and Law Schools Reported by Survey Respondents

Paul Brandt-Rauf, DrPH, MD, ScD Dean July 19, 2012

David S. Lee. FIELDS OF INTEREST Labor Economics, Econometrics, Political Economy, Public Policy

Graduate School Rankings By U.S. News & World Report: ENGINEERING SCHOOLS

ARCHITECTURE TOP 20 PROGRAMS 2014

A STUDY PUBLISHED in 1966 revealed a

The University of California at Berkeley. A Brief Overview July 2007 For Presentation in Tokyo by Professor Stephen Cohen

My background College president and dean Colorado College, Brown University, University of Maryland Taught at Sichuan University Fall 2000 Fulbright S

Summer Research-Early Identification Program Online Application

DWIGHT DAVID EISENHOWER TRANSPORTATION FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM 2015 EISENHOWER TRANSPORTATION FELLOWSHIP.

NAAB Accredited Program List

8/12/15 Summary of Results of Survey of US Academic Departments that Include Planetary Science

Medical School Math Requirements and Recommendations

Introduction. Degree Disciplines

MBA Prospects Survey 2013 Findings. June 10, 2013

Drexel University College of Medicine

NASPAA s Research Universities Report 3/4/16

Graduate School Rankings By U.S. News & World Report: CIVIL ENGINEERING

APRU Business Deans Meeting 2008 Preparing Students to Lead in Tomorrow s Global Economy. By Leonard Cheng Acting Dean HKUST Business School

Minority PhDs in Physics: 20% Representation and a Plan to Address This

A Ranking of Political Science Programs Based on Publications in Top Academic Journals and Book Presses

Arizona State University: A Strategic Perspective

Update on Priorities and Data Comparison between TTU & AAU Institutions M. Duane Nellis President Texas Tech University

2009 GRADUATE FACULTY IN PSYCHOLOGY INTERESTED IN LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, & TRANSGENDER ISSUES SURVEY

ISSN Annual Salary Survey 1988 ARL

Transcription:

2001 National Name Exchange Committee on Cooperative Minority Student Recruitment Annual Report http://www.grad.washington.edu/nameexch/national/ Prepared for the 26 th Annual Meeting Durham, North Carolina April 27, 2002 Hosted By: Duke University

Purpose The National Name Exchange is a consortium of twenty-eight universities, which annually collects and exchanges names of talented under-represented ethnic minority students who are in their junior or senior year of their undergraduate education. The purpose of the Name Exchange is to ensure that participating universities continue to identify a pool of qualified students who can be recruited to the graduate programs at these name-exchanging institutions. 2001 National Name Exchange 2

Institution Requirements Each institution participating in the National Name Exchange must demonstrate that it will be able to carry out the following functions which are required by the Consortium:! Attend the annual conference.! Generate a list of qualified minority juniors and seniors at the institution in the desired format. (Each institution is supplied with a Consent Form and a set of instructions.)! Return the information to the central collecting institution at the agreed upon time.! Devise a mechanism to successfully use the names supplied to the institution by the other members of the Consortium.! Identify someone who can serve as a contact person for students and faculty who desire information about the institution.! Provide a mechanism to assist students to make an informed decision regarding their graduate and professional careers.! Host at least one of the annual meetings of the membership. 2001 National Name Exchange 3

Hosting the National Name Exchange Hosting an annual meeting of the membership includes but is not limited to the following activities:! Working with the Chair to develop an agenda for the meeting.! Providing the membership with hotel, transportation, and visitor information pertinent to location of meeting.! Providing a reception - wine, cheese, etc. - on the day of arrival at your campus or other designated location.! Providing breakfast (continental or otherwise), lunch, and refreshments during the meeting.! Providing meeting rooms and any other requirements - over-head projectors, duplicating facilities, etc. - which would facilitate a successful meeting. 2001 National Name Exchange 4

The Current Membership! Brown University! California Institute of Technology! Carnegie-Mellon University! Columbia University! Cornell University! Duke University! Harvard University! Howard University! Massachusetts Institute of Technology! Northwestern University! Ohio State University! Princeton University! Stanford University! University of Arizona! University of California, Berkeley! University of California, San Diego! University of Chicago! University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign! University of Maryland! University of Michigan! University of Minnesota! University of North Carolina! University of Pennsylvania! University of Texas at Austin! University of Washington! Vanderbilt University! Washington University! Yale University The Current Chair David Redman Associate Dean The Graduate School Princeton University 2001 National Name Exchange 5

2001 National Membership Participation in the consortium is voluntary with each institution bearing whatever costs it incurs in fulfilling the requirements of its membership. The underlying factors which have sustained the organization over the years are: "A commitment on the part of the membership to work continually to increase the enrollment of traditionally under-represented minority students in graduate programs. "A commitment on the part of the membership to trust that a representative from each institution will vigorously pursue the objectives of the Consortium. "Institutions must both contribute names to the Exchange and send its representative(s) to the annual meetings. Institutions which either do not contribute names to the Exchange or whose representatives fail to attend meetings for two consecutive years may be asked to leave the Consortium. 2001 National Name Exchange 6

Application/Nomination Institutions wishing to participate in the consortium may apply or may be nominated by any current member university. Applications are made in writing to the Chair of the consortium, who informs the applying institution of the criteria used to evaluate applicants. The Chair also reviews the documentation supplied by the applicant institution prior to the annual meeting. All applications are discussed and voted upon by the entire body at the annual meeting. In 1984, the body voted to limit membership to thirty institutions. The following criteria are used to evaluate applicants for admission: 1. The institution should have both undergraduate and graduate programs of a quality comparable to those offered by the present member institutions and should offer qualities which would enhance the educational opportunities of the students at the member institutions. This is necessary if true exchange among institutions is to be maintained. 2. The institution must demonstrate and document how interest in increasing the enrollments of traditionally under-represented students is manifested on their campus. An expression of interest in the recruitment of minority students is not sufficient to warrant admission. 3. The representative of the institution should be a person in a position to make decisions that are honored and respected by the institution. 2001 National Name Exchange 7

Highlights of the 2001 Program! Participation in the Exchange was down again, from 3,011 in 2000 to 2,693 in 2001, a decrease of approximately 11%. Since 1999 numbers have decreased by 19%.! From 2000 to 2001, female participation decreased by 11% and male participation decreased nearly 1.! Mexican American/Chicano student numbers decreased slightly, from 14% of the total population in 2000 to 13% in 2001.! Although Asian American student numbers decreased slightly, participation increased from 35% of the total pool in 2000 to 37% in 2001.! African American participation had the highest decrease in population from 665 in 2000 to 578 in 2001.! Puerto Rican participation decreased slightly but still constitutes 2% of the 2001 population.! American Indian participation decreased from 69 in 2001 to 57 in 2001, but still remained 2% of the total participants.! While numbers in most disciplines declined between 2000 and 2001, engineering numbers increased marginally. The health sciences and professional fields again decreased most significantly.! This is the third year using the On-line Consent Form (OCF) for students. Use of OCF increased from 64% last year to 77% this year. 2001 National Name Exchange 8

History of Student Participation 4500 4000 3500 Female Male 3000 2500 2000 + 1500 1000 500 0 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Female 701 908 1167 1350 1337 1778 2382 897 912 1561 1575 2242 1795 2172 2095 1856 1649 Male 673 985 1122 1269 1167 1515 1925 1141 1170 1238 1133 1511 1098 1191 1252 1155 1044 2001 National Name Exchange 9

Participation By Ethnicity and Gender African American American Indian Asian American Chicano Filipino Latino Male Female Pacific Islander Puerto Rican Other 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Number of Students 2001 National Name Exchange 10

Participation by Discipline and Gender Social Sciences Psychology Professional Fields Physical Sciences Mathematics Male Health Sciences Female Engineering Education Biological Sciences Arts & Humanities Agriculture 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Number of Students 2001 National Name Exchange 11

Trends in Participation by Ethnicity % African American % American Indian 2 1 2 1 % Asian American 2 1 2001 National Name Exchange 12

Trends in Participation by Ethnicity (cont.) % Chicano 2 1 % Filipino 2 1 % Latino 2 1 2001 National Name Exchange 13

Trends in Participation by Ethnicity (cont.) % Pacific Islander 2 1 % Puerto Rican 2 1 % Other 2 1 2001 National Name Exchange 14

Trends in Participation by Discipline % Agriculture % Arts & Humanities 2 1 2 1 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 % Biological Sci. 2 1 % Education 2 1 2001 National Name Exchange 15

Trends in Participation by Discipline (cont.) % Engineering % Health Sciences 2 1 2 1 % Mathematics 2 1 % Physical Sci. 2 1 2001 National Name Exchange 16

Trends in Participation by Discipline (cont.) % Professional Fields % Psychology 2 1 2 1 % Social Sci. 2 1 2001 National Name Exchange 17

Student Participation by Discipline African Am Am Indian Asian Am Chicano Filipino Latino Am Pacific Is P. Rican Other Total Graduate Discipline M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F Agriculture 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Arts and Humanities 14 39 2 5 23 48 22 34 2 6 21 29 0 3 1 3 13 18 283 Biological Sciences 9 16 0 2 37 47 8 10 6 3 12 13 0 2 0 0 3 7 175 Education 5 22 0 1 8 27 3 13 0 0 2 10 0 0 1 1 0 8 101 Engineering 36 14 5 1 152 73 18 4 3 3 28 9 2 1 4 0 11 6 370 Health Sciences 12 67 1 3 37 63 4 23 4 12 3 26 2 2 2 1 2 17 281 Mathematics 2 1 2 0 4 6 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 20 Physical Sciences 1 3 0 2 12 16 2 1 0 0 5 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 46 Professional Fields 62 127 3 10 118 171 43 55 7 19 52 68 2 2 8 9 13 34 803 Psychology 7 44 0 4 8 37 6 23 2 7 10 29 1 1 3 3 3 7 195 Social Sciences 24 71 4 12 41 66 24 45 5 10 27 28 1 4 2 3 16 31 414 TOTAL 172 406 17 40 440 555 133 209 29 60 161 214 8 15 22 20 62 130 2693 2001 National Name Exchange 18

Student Participation by Institution African Am Am Indian Asian Am Chicano Filipino Latino Am Pacific Isl P. Rican Other Total %Total INSTITUTION M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F BROWN U 9 12 1 3 22 17 5 7 1 1 5 5 0 2 1 1 2 10 104 4% CAL INST OF TECH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CARNEGIE MELLON U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 COLUMBIA U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CORNELL U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DUKE U 4 22 0 1 33 23 1 0 2 0 8 10 0 0 1 0 3 2 110 4% HARVARD U 3 8 0 1 0 0 3 2 0 0 4 3 0 0 1 1 3 3 32 1% HOWARD U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MASS INST OF TECH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NORTHWESTERN U 2 9 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 3 0 0 2 0 1 1 23 1% OHIO STATE U 12 39 1 1 27 24 1 4 0 0 4 7 1 1 6 1 7 7 143 5% PRINCETON U 4 7 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 2 1 4 24 1% STANFORD U 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 U OF ARIZONA 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 U OF CAL, BERKELEY 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 U OF CAL,SAN DIEGO 2 8 2 2 68 105 18 32 7 9 13 12 0 2 1 0 5 6 292 11% U OF CHICAGO 3 7 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 5 3 0 0 0 1 1 1 27 1% U OF ILLINOIS, URBANA 13 28 1 0 0 0 8 9 0 0 5 7 0 0 1 1 2 2 77 3% U OF MARYLAND 35 68 0 6 65 71 2 1 4 7 28 40 2 0 1 2 4 17 353 13% U OF MICHIGAN 13 35 0 2 49 59 5 8 3 5 7 10 0 1 0 0 6 12 215 8% U MINNESOTA 13 16 2 2 9 37 3 1 2 1 5 6 0 1 0 0 7 5 110 4% U OF N CAROLINA 15 63 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 15 0 0 1 0 3 3 108 4% U OF PENNSYLVANIA 0 2 0 1 7 8 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 1% U OF TEXAS, AUSTIN 15 40 3 9 1 1 65 112 0 0 46 68 0 0 3 5 6 24 398 15% U OF WASHINGTON 15 20 6 11 144 192 10 15 10 37 18 12 5 8 1 1 7 28 540 2 VANDERBILT U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. WASHINGTON U 8 14 0 0 0 2 0 5 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 1 2 1 42 2% YALE U 6 6 0 0 15 16 6 2 0 0 3 4 0 0 1 4 2 3 68 3% TOTAL 172 406 17 40 440 555 133 209 29 60 161 214 8 15 22 20 62 130 2693 10 % of Total 6% 15% 1% 1% 16% 21% 5% 8% 1% 2% 6% 8% 1% 1% 1% 2% 5% 10 Tot by Ethnic Group 578 57 995 342 89 375 23 42 192 % Ethnic of Total 21% 2% 37% 13% 3% 14% 1% 2% 7% 2001 National Name Exchange 19

Participation by Entry Type RDE 21% U.W. 2% OCF 77% 2001 National Name Exchange 20

The Name Exchange Web http://www.grad.washington.edu/nameexch/national/ Please treat this as our common resource; suggestions and useful links are welcomed! Please check the student home page at http://www.grad.washington.edu/nameexch/national/student.html Are the useful links useful? Is your institution linked from the Name Exchange Homepage? Report Prepared By This report was prepared by the Graduate Opportunities & Minority Achievement Program of the Graduate School at the University of Washington. All questions regarding the contents of this report should be directed to: Cynthia Morales The Graduate School, Box 351240 University of Washington Seattle, Washington 98195-1240 cmorales@u.washington.edu 2001 National Name Exchange 21