Bernie Nimer, Dave Seton Mayfair Hotel Development Corporation



Similar documents
Building Condition Assessment: West Lexington Street Baltimore, Maryland

Photo 2. View showing flour mill, machine shed, veranda and saw mill + storage shed.

STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT. Full Metal Jacket Building 0 Prince Street, Alexandria, VA

Slavic Village Building Condition Review

Building Condition Assessment: North Howard Street Baltimore, Maryland

Engineers, Civil Structural Survey

Elevating Your House. Introduction CHAPTER 5

Building Foundation and Structure

201 WATER STREET FORWARDERS MUSEUM AND VISITORS INFORMATION CENTRE

Proposed Minimum Subterranean Termite Treatment Standards

MILWAUKEE CITY HALL FOUNDATION RESTORATION. Project Update November 12, 2014

Designed and Engineered to Perform

D Sample Notices to Property Owners, Sample Affidavits, and Other Material

SECTION 1.0 STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION AND PURPOSE

symptoms of a faulty foundation

bout your HOUSE before you start Renovating Your Basement Structural Issues And Soil conditions

Lighthouse Engineering, L.L.C.

SECTION EARTH MOVING

WET/DAMP BASEMENTS ANSWER: BASEMENT WALLS AND FLOORS CAN BECOME WET BY A LEAK, CAPILLARY SUCTION OR CONDENSATION.

STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT

Seattle Public Schools Building Excellence IV Projects Under Construction

How to Identify, Evaluate & Repair Shrinkage Cracks in Poured Concrete

National Home Builder - Name Wednesday, August 20, 2014 Regional Customer Care Manager 1234 Main Street Houston, Texas 77067

SECTION REMOVAL OR ABANDONMENT OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES. 1. Trench excavation, backfill, and compaction; Section

Metropolitan Builders Association Masonry & Concrete Standard

14 September Sarah Zorn Planning and Economic Development 25 West Fourth Street, Ste St. Paul, MN 55102

Exterior Elevated Elements Inspection Guidelines

Prepared For San Francisco Community College District 33 Gough Street San Francisco, California Prepared By

BROWNSVILLE STRUCTURES STUDY. July Prepared by. LDA ARCHITECTS 33 Terminal Way, Suite 317 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

NCMA TEK CONCRETE MASONRY FOUNDATION WALL DETAILS. TEK 5-3A Details (2003)

PELHAM MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL STONE FAÇADE REPORT. November 2007

Public Works Operations Manual Standard Operating Procedures for Water and Sewer WS-A412 Water Connection Repair

MEMORANDUM. General: Foundation:

Safe & Sound Bridge Terminology

City of Treasure Island FEMA Cost Breakdown Worksheet For Substantial Improvement / Damage

GEORGE J. CAMBOURAKIS, P.E., C. ENG. PRESIDENT & CHIEF STRUCTURAL ENGINEER

Photos showing the change in condition from 2006 to 2012 are located in Appendix A.

Investigation of Foundation Failure. Step 1 - Data Collection. Investigation Steps

Residential Foundations and Basements

SECTION ABANDONMENT OF SEWER MAINS

Chapter. Earthquake Damage: Types, Process, Categories

March 19, Ms. Jean McDonald CAP Management th Street, Suite 1010 Denver, Colorado 80202

University of Missouri Hospitals and Clinics. Structural Repair and Protection of Post-tensioned Parking Garage

Facility Assessment for East Main Street, Huntley, IL

June 2007 CHAPTER 7 - CULVERTS 7.0 CHAPTER 7 - CULVERTS 7.1 GENERAL

EAST LYME HIGH SCHOOL

Excerpts from the Canadian National Building Code (NBC)

Chapter. Restoration of Damaged Structures

Mitigation Leads to Preservation and Economic Recovery For One Community: Darlington, Wisconsin

Foundation. Foundation

Chapter 3 Pre-Installation, Foundations and Piers

DRAPER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

IH-635 MANAGED LANES PROJECT, SEG. 3.2

City of Kingston Information Report to Municipal Heritage Committee Report Number MHC

Chapter 9 Remedial Measures

The better way to build TM. Installation Manual. FOUNDATION SIPs & FROST WALLS SIPs

SCHEMATIC AND PROJECT BUDGET APPROVAL EAST CAMPUS NURSING EDUCATION AND CLASSROOM

REQUEST FOR BOARD ACTION HENDERSON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Construction Management Update

The Lambton County Homeowner's BUILDING PERMIT INFORMATION GUIDE

Structural Damage Due to Floods

Common Perils of Ceramic Floor Tile Systems. Parkway, Suite 220, Plano, Texas 75093; PH (469) ;

Lighthouse Engineering, L.L.C.

C. Section TESTING LABORATORY SERVICE.

Foundation Experts, LLC Specializes in Foundation Repair and Waterproofing

RESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION GUIDELINE Johnson County, KS

LOWEST FLOOR GUIDE I. LOWEST FLOOR DETERMINATION

DUDERSTADT FOUNDATION & CONSTRUCTION, LLC.

6 RETROFITTING POST & PIER HOUSES

Basement Moisture Problems

Flood Risk Considerations

Vision Home Inspection

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FROM FOUNDATION REPAIR CONTRACTORS BROOMFIELD DEPOT FOUNDATION REHABILITATION PROJECT

Foundations 65 5 FOUNDATIONS. by Richard Chylinski, FAIA and Timothy P. McCormick, P.E. Seismic Retrofit Training

Emergency repair of Bridge B421

Lowering Basement Floors (Underpinning, Benching)

Preliminary Damage Assessment (PDA) Field Guide

SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT OR SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNER

Reference: BRM A0 July 18 th, Cursory Visual Review of Various Below Grade Spaces and Exposed Foundation Walls

SECTION STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES. 1. Trench excavation, backfill, and compaction; Section

Presenters. The Ups and Downs of Home Elevations 4/29/2016. Hazard Mitigation Grant (HMA) Programs

HIGH LEVEL SEISMIC UPGRADE COST ESTIMATE FOR CENTRE BLOCK, PARLIAMENT HILL

Lighthouse Engineering, L.L.C.

Exhibit A. Rules and Regulations for House Connections and Sewer Extensions

EXTERNAL WATERPROOFING MEMBRANES BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINES

RRIO Checklist. Use of checklist: Definitions: Limitations

SECTION SELECTIVE DEMOLITION

July 29, Revise Section 1.1 (BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT) to the following:

The minimum reinforcement for the stem wall is the placement of:

Case Studies. Disaster Recovery Restoration Remediation Decontamination

Foundation Requirements and Recommendations for Elevated Homes Hurricane Sandy Recovery Fact Sheet

Basement Window Installation Guide Hopper and Sliding

Important Information for Owners of Buildings in Flood Zones

SECTION ABANDONMENT OF WATER MAINS. A. Conform to requirements of Section Submittals.

Transcription:

SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT NO. S1r1 PROJECT: The Mayfair Hotel PROJECT NO: 140565 ATTN: Bernie Nimer, Dave Seton Mayfair Hotel Development Corporation PREPARED BY: Cory Zurell, PhD, P.Eng. DATE: 13 April 2015 As requested, we visited 11 Young St. and 156 158 King Street West in order to assess damage caused by a watermain break that occurred under Young St. during this past weekend. Our findings are as follows: Observations The watermain break occurred under Young St. about halfway along the Young St. elevation of the existing building. Sidewalk slabs have heaved and we understand that probing beneath the slabs indicates a void of over a metre deep in the worst affected area. We understand that the basement flooded over the weekend, with the water depth reaching the underside of the ground floor joists in some areas. The water pressure appears to have opened a horizontal slot in the foundation wall. It is located in the room housing the water

service in the basement. We hypothesize that a sufficiently fast stream of water was able to leak in perhaps beside an existing water pipe, and subsequently eroded the wall, creating the slot. The slot is between 1m and 1.5m wide. The basement floor is now covered with a significant amount of sediment varying up to about a metre within the water service room. From inside the basement water service room daylight can be seen through the slot in the foundation wall. Close to the damaged foundation wall is the masonry pier previously identified as being deficient and potentially unstable. It was temporarily shored during demolition of finishes however the area must be treated with caution to prevent further degradation. The basement of 156 158 King was reviewed. There was no apparent structural damage to this building; effects were limited to water damage of finishes and sediment covering the floor. Conclusions & Recommendations The portion of foundation wall in the water service room has been compromised and the exterior load bearing wall above has been undermined. The wall directly above the slot does not appear to be in imminent danger of collapse; the masonry is arching over the slot. That said the wall above the slot should not be left unsupported for an extended period of time. blackwell.ca Page 2 of 5

Any work performed in this area either inside or outside of the building must be done with great care. Adjacent to the washed out area is the deficient masonry pier. It was temporarily shored however extensive work in this area could result in further damage. This pier should be further secured prior to work being carried out on the sidewalk and subgrade. The condition of the outside face of the foundation wall at the water service room is unknown. Vibrations could further damage these areas. Should repairs of the sidewalk be undertaken by the city, we recommend that the sidewalk slabs requiring removal should be extracted without imposing vibrations in the area; jackhammers could cause further damage. Exterior backfill should be carried out with lean concrete or crushed stone so that compaction of granular materials is not required. Prior to backfilling adjacent to the building, the foundation wall should be reviewed once it is exposed to view to assess any potential damage. Regarding repairs to the existing building, as previously noted in our condition survey, dated 15 December 2014, work inside the building should be limited if at all possible. Several areas of framing, including in the area of the stair to the basement, are compromised some severely. Movement of equipment to assist in the cleanup of the basement and any repair of the foundation wall needs to be reviewed and shoring will likely be required to ensure safe access. Followup Subsequent to the above, we attended the site to discuss the issues with the City of Kitchener Building and Utilities departments and determine a possible sequence of addressing the damage caused by the watermain break. As noted above, the deficient portion of the masonry wall (item 4.3.1 in our report dated 15 December 2014) adjacent to the damaged foundation should, in our opinion, be secured prior to any work being carried out on the sidewalk and subgrade. Without shoring the wall is currently unsafe, and subject to potential collapse under reasonable loading conditions. To achieve a safe structure in this location, we anticipate that needling and shoring the wall at approximately the second floor level would be required in order to repair the affected masonry between the ground and second floors. The following issues present themselves based on possible sequencing of work: blackwell.ca Page 3 of 5

Needling of the wall to install shoring will necessitate drilling or coring of the existing masonry. This work would cause vibrations that may be detrimental to the deficient portion of wall, creating a significant risk and hazard to workers performing the work. The sidewalk adjacent the building in this location, and for a significant area to each side, has been undermined. The roadway may be partially undermined as well. Shoring could therefore not be installed without lifting and remediating the areas under the sidewalk. As already noted, lifting and restoring the sidewalk would pose a significant risk and hazard to workers performing the work given the condition of the noted masonry wall, in particular, and of the building structure in general. The above noted conditions create a stalemate. As noted in our report of 15 December, the existing building has severe structural deficiencies and is of little structural value. Work necessary to repair the new damage caused by the watermain break is dependent upon repairs that, themselves, create a significant risk and hazard to carry out. Additionally, the balance of repairs necessary to renovate the building and bring it up to code, are not, in our opinion, viable given the current state of the structure. Based on the current conditions, and the risks associated with executing repairs at this time, it is our opinion that the building should be demolished to mitigate the risks to potential workers and to the general public. We trust that the above summary is sufficient for your current needs. Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Best regards, 2015.4.13 blackwell.ca Page 4 of 5

Blackwell blackwell.ca Page 5 of 5