Investigations of Polar Stratopause Temperatures using. a High-Altitude Version of GEOS-5

Similar documents
SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF NORTHERN HEMISPHERE WINTER TEMPERATURES OVER THE SOLAR CYCLE DURING THE LAST 130 YEARS

State of the Art of Mesospheric Modeling

Atmospheric Dynamics of Venus and Earth. Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics UCLA 2 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

Fundamentals of Climate Change (PCC 587): Water Vapor

ATMOSPHERIC STRUCTURE. The vertical distribution of temperature, pressure,

Very High Resolution Arctic System Reanalysis for

Visualizing of Berkeley Earth, NASA GISS, and Hadley CRU averaging techniques

Estimation of satellite observations bias correction for limited area model

CHAPTER 5 Lectures 10 & 11 Air Temperature and Air Temperature Cycles

ATMS 310 Jet Streams

VAMP Vertical Aeolus Measurement Positioning

Stratosphere-Troposphere Exchange in the Tropics. Masatomo Fujiwara Hokkaido University, Japan (14 March 2006)

Lecture 4: Pressure and Wind

Mean age of air and transport in a CTM: Comparison of different ECMWF analyses

Comparative Evaluation of High Resolution Numerical Weather Prediction Models COSMO-WRF

Chapter 6: Cloud Development and Forms

Guy Carpenter Asia-Pacific Climate Impact Centre, School of energy and Environment, City University of Hong Kong

What the Heck are Low-Cloud Feedbacks? Takanobu Yamaguchi Rachel R. McCrary Anna B. Harper

James Hansen, Reto Ruedy, Makiko Sato, Ken Lo

Near Real Time Blended Surface Winds

STATUS AND RESULTS OF OSEs. (Submitted by Dr Horst Böttger, ECMWF) Summary and Purpose of Document

Seasonal & Daily Temperatures. Seasons & Sun's Distance. Solstice & Equinox. Seasons & Solar Intensity

Comparison of the Vertical Velocity used to Calculate the Cloud Droplet Number Concentration in a Cloud-Resolving and a Global Climate Model

Chapter 3: Weather Map. Weather Maps. The Station Model. Weather Map on 7/7/2005 4/29/2011

Solar Flux and Flux Density. Lecture 3: Global Energy Cycle. Solar Energy Incident On the Earth. Solar Flux Density Reaching Earth

Comment on "Observational and model evidence for positive low-level cloud feedback"

Developing Continuous SCM/CRM Forcing Using NWP Products Constrained by ARM Observations

Assimilation in the upper stratosphere and mesosphere: role of radiances

Lab Activity on Global Wind Patterns

Monsoon Variability and Extreme Weather Events

Lecture 1: A Brief Survey of the Atmosphere

How Do Oceans Affect Weather and Climate?

8.5 Comparing Canadian Climates (Lab)

Cloud Model Verification at the Air Force Weather Agency

Hybrid Data Assimilation in the GSI

Chapter 3: Weather Map. Station Model and Weather Maps Pressure as a Vertical Coordinate Constant Pressure Maps Cross Sections

Titelmasterformat durch Klicken. bearbeiten

ESCI 107/109 The Atmosphere Lesson 2 Solar and Terrestrial Radiation

Daily High-resolution Blended Analyses for Sea Surface Temperature

ENSO Cycle: Recent Evolution, Current Status and Predictions. Update prepared by Climate Prediction Center / NCEP 9 May 2011

Examining the Recent Pause in Global Warming

Anyone Else Notice That Its Been Windy Lately?

Chapter Overview. Seasons. Earth s Seasons. Distribution of Solar Energy. Solar Energy on Earth. CHAPTER 6 Air-Sea Interaction

Using Cloud-Resolving Model Simulations of Deep Convection to Inform Cloud Parameterizations in Large-Scale Models

A Project to Create Bias-Corrected Marine Climate Observations from ICOADS

Frank and Charles Cohen Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA, U.S.A.

Tropical Horticulture: Lecture 2

Month-Long 2D Cloud-Resolving Model Simulation and Resultant Statistics of Cloud Systems Over the ARM SGP

RAPIDS Operational Blending of Nowcasting and NWP QPF

The Earth's Atmosphere. Layers of the Earth's Atmosphere

Sub-grid cloud parametrization issues in Met Office Unified Model

Can latent heat release have a negative effect on polar low intensity?

Huai-Min Zhang & NOAAGlobalTemp Team

Validation of SEVIRI cloud-top height retrievals from A-Train data

CGC1D1: Interactions in the Physical Environment Factors that Affect Climate

R1 The meeting endorses the recommendations from the ATMOS User Meeting in All of which are relevant

Atmospheric Processes

IMPACT OF SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY-AMERENUE QUANTUM WEATHER PROJECT MESONET DATA ON WRF-ARW FORECASTS

ENSO: Recent Evolution, Current Status and Predictions. Update prepared by: Climate Prediction Center / NCEP 29 June 2015

Chapter 4 Atmospheric Pressure and Wind

Optimisation of Aeolus Sampling

Interaction of Energy and Matter Gravity Measurement: Using Doppler Shifts to Measure Mass Concentration TEACHER GUIDE

Parameterization of Cumulus Convective Cloud Systems in Mesoscale Forecast Models

DIURNAL CYCLE OF CLOUD SYSTEM MIGRATION OVER SUMATERA ISLAND

Performance Metrics for Climate Models: WDAC advancements towards routine modeling benchmarks

Noon Sun Angle = 90 Zenith Angle

Statistical analysis of total column ozone data

Temporal variation in snow cover over sea ice in Antarctica using AMSR-E data product

Launch-Ready Operations Code Chain ESDT ShortNames, LongNames, and Generating PGE or Ingest Source

Predicting daily incoming solar energy from weather data

In this Chapter, then, we will describe the observed climatology 1 of atmospheric temperature, pressure, humidity and wind.

Advances in data assimilation techniques

MICROPHYSICS COMPLEXITY EFFECTS ON STORM EVOLUTION AND ELECTRIFICATION

Impact of ATOVS geopotential heights retrievals on analyses generated by RPSAS

The impact of window size on AMV

A Description of the 2nd Generation NOAA Global Ensemble Reforecast Data Set

REGIONAL CLIMATE AND DOWNSCALING

Physics of the Atmosphere I

Southern AER Atmospheric Education Resource

Benefits accruing from GRUAN

The atmospheres of different planets

The Sun, Solar Analogs and the Climate

An A-Train Water Vapor Thematic Climate Data Record Using Cloud Classification

Overview of the IR channels and their applications

How To Determine Height Assignment Error

Relationship between the Subtropical Anticyclone and Diabatic Heating

Geography affects climate.

Satellite'&'NASA'Data'Intro'

Dynamical response to the solar cycle

Hybrid-DA in NWP. Experience at the Met Office and elsewhere. GODAE OceanView DA Task Team. Andrew Lorenc, Met Office, Exeter.

What Causes Climate? Use Target Reading Skills

Improving Low-Cloud Simulation with an Upgraded Multiscale Modeling Framework

Evalua&ng Downdra/ Parameteriza&ons with High Resolu&on CRM Data

SPARC Report and WGNE role

Training Material for Balances (1) Prepared by R&D Division 1. Marketing Department A&D Company, Limited

HFIP Web Support and Display and Diagnostic System Development

Chapter 2: Solar Radiation and Seasons

Diurnal Cycle of Convection at the ARM SGP Site: Role of Large-Scale Forcing, Surface Fluxes, and Convective Inhibition

Solar system studies with the SMA. Arielle MOULLET, Mark GURWELL and the SMA team

Review 1. Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Transcription:

Stratospheric Processes And their Role in Climate (SPARC) Data Assimilation Workshop 21-23 June 2010 Exeter, England Investigations of Polar Stratopause Temperatures using a High-Altitude Version of GEOS-5 L. Coy Space Sciences Division, Naval Research Laboratory Steven Pawson Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Recent studies have shown that the altitude of the polar stratopause can change dramatically in response to sudden stratospheric warmings (SSWs) and that these changes can be difficult to reproduce in a data assimilation system (DAS). A high-altitude version of the GEOS-5 (Goddard Earth Observing System) DAS is used to investigate the dependence of the stratopause temperatures on the model top and higher altitude observations during the major SSWs of January 2006 and January 2009. The newly developed high-altitude version of GEOS-5 extends from the surface to ~95 km, thus covering the stratosphere and mesosphere

Stratopause Temperature Problem Stratospheric Sudden Warmings (SSWs) from 2006 and 2009 show large changes in the polar stratopause (Manney et al., 2008; Manney et al., 2009). GEOS-5 (and GEOS-4) analyses have trouble representing these dynamic polar stratopause changes (Manney et al., 2008; Manney et al., 2009). Question: Can a higher altitude DAS more realistically track these changes?

Outline GEOS-5 Data Assimilation System GEOS-5 DAS High-Altitude Extension Non-LTE IR (Fomichev) Model Error Fields Results from January 2007 experiments Winds and Temperature O-F Statistics Future Plans

GEOS-5 System Current operational NASA global atmospheric modeling and assimilation system (Rienecker et al., 2008). Earth System Modeling Framework (ESMF) Dynamical Core: FVGCM (Finite Volume GCM; Lin, 2004) Radiative Transfer: NASA CLIRAD (Chou and Suarez, 2002) Gravity Wave Drag: WACCM based Data Assimilation System: GSI (Grid-point Statistical Interpolation: NCEP)

GEOS-5 High-Altitude DAS The GEOS-5 (Goddard Earth Observing System: Version 5) high-altitude DAS is currently under development. Plan: Build on successful Navy NOGAPS-ALPHA high-altitude DAS (Hoppel et al., 2008). High-Altitude Standard First assimilate Aura MLS temperatures followed by TIMED SABER temperatures.

GEOS-5 High-Altitude DAS Short GCM forecast from climate initial conditions High-Altitude Top 0.001 Standard Top Cold Mesopause Pressure (hpa) Warm Stratopause 1000 90 S 90 N 90 S 90 N Latitude Latitude High-altitude allows for model and data assimilation in the entire middle atmosphere (Jets are not cut-off just above the stratopause) with a full mean meridional circulation

NOGAPS High-Altitude DAS Monthly Average for June 2007 High-Altitude Top Standard Top Ozone Pressure (hpa) 90 S 90 N 90 S 90 N Latitude Latitude NOGAPS-ALPHA (Navy Operational Global Atmospheric Prediction System Advanced Level Physics High Altitude) DAS (Hoppel et al., 2008) uses the same radiative transfer code as GEOS-5 and a similar GWD formulation allowing GEOS-5 high-altitude to benefit from NOGAPS- ALPHA development.

GEOS-5 High Altitude IR Non-LTE Extension Following NOGAPS-ALPHA, NASA CLIRAD radiative fluxes are blended with independently calculated IR fluxes (Fomichev, 1998) at high altitudes. GEOS-5 (CLIRAD) Only Fomichev Heating Rates above 1 hpa Blending at 75 Km 1-Day Forecast (1 Jan2005)

Model Error Extensions The NCEP DAS allows for latitude and altitude variations of model error standard deviations, horizontal length scale, and vertical length scale for streamfunction, velocity potential, temperature, ozone, etc. These quantities have to be extended for higher altitudes. They are usually calculated from a series of 24 and 48 hr forecasts. These require some bootstrapping. In the meantime we can.. Simply extend the top values as most of the model error fields are nearly independent of altitude at upper levels. GMAO GEOS-5 Code Assimilation Component The same system as NCEP Wu, W.-S., R. J. Purser, and D. F. Parish, Three-dimensional variational analysis with spatially inhomogeneous covariances, Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 2905 2916, 2002.

2D Model Error Fields (Latitude x Model Level) 1D (91) Array Stream Potential Temp RH Cond. RH found after zero arrays Std Deviation Model Level Horizontal Scale Vertical Scale Latitude

2D Model Error Fields (High-Altitude) Stream Potential Temp RH Cond. RH 1D (91) Array found after zero arrays Std Deviation Model Level Horizontal Scale Vertical Scale Latitude

2D Model Error Fields (Reduced at Top) Reduced Model Error at Top Stream Potential Temp RH Cond. RH 1D (91) Array found after zero arrays Std Deviation Model Level Horizontal Scale Vertical Scale Latitude

2D Model Error Fields (Some Reduction at Top) Reduced Model Error at Top Stream Potential Temp RH Cond. RH 1D (91) Array found after zero arrays Std Deviation Model Level Horizontal Scale Vertical Scale Latitude

Stream Function Temperature Correlation All vertical levels at 60, -30, 30, 60 degrees latitude Extrapolate by shifting arrays diagonally at each latitude.

Stream Function Temperature Correlation (Extended) All vertical levels at 60N Fill Corners with Zeros

Stream Function Velocity Potential Correlation Balanced Projection for Velocity Potential Balanced Projection for Surface Pressure Difficult to extrapolate Extrapolate to Zero

Stream Function Velocity Potential Correlation For now, linearly interpolate from 72 top value to average of 62-72 values. For now, set to zero

Experiments Initial Time: 19 December 2006 00 UTC Initial Fields: Operational GEOS-5 at lower levels, climate and extrapolated fields at upper levels End Time: 31 January 2007 18 UTC Observations: Conventional only; Conventional and MLS temperature profiles

January 2007 Average Temperature (Colored Contours) Zonal Wind (Black Contours) No High-Altitude MLS Data No Fomichev IR Cooling Conventional Obs Only coy033 coy032

January 2007 Average Temperature (Colored Contours) Zonal Wind (Black Contours) With High-Altitude MLS Data Reduced Model Error at Top Conventional Obs Only coy035 coy032

January 2007 Average Temperature (Colored Contours) Zonal Wind (Black Contours) With High-Altitude MLS Data Reduced GWD efficiency 0.125 0.0625 coy039 Conventional Obs Only coy032

January 2007 Average Temperature (Colored Contours) Zonal Wind (Black Contours) With High-Altitude MLS Data Reduced Model Error at Top Full GEOS-5 Assimilation coy035

January 2007 Average Temperature (Colored Contours) Zonal Wind (Black Contours) With High-Altitude MLS Data Reduced Model Error at Top Fomichev IR Solar Bug Fix coy040 As on the left Plus: Increased Model Error near top coy041

A F at 0.04 hpa Model Error Decreased A F for MLS Temperature EXP coy040

A F at 0.04 hpa A F for MLS Temperature EXP coy041

A F at 0.04 hpa (From Hoppel et al., 2008) NOGAPS-ALPHA NAVDAS A F for MLS and SABER Temperature EXP coy041

MLS O-F Average (January 2007) Strongly Reduced Model Error From Hoppel et al., 2008 Jan-Feb 2006 Average Black MLS Red SABER

MLS O-F Average (January 2007) Somewhat Reduced Model Error From Hoppel et al., 2008 Jan-Feb 2006 Average Black MLS Red SABER

MLS O-F STD (January 2007) Strongly Reduced Model Error From Hoppel et al., 2008 Jan-Feb 2006 Average Black MLS Red SABER

MLS O-F STD (January 2007) Somewhat Reduced Model Error From Hoppel et al., 2008 Jan-Feb 2006 Average Black MLS Red SABER

MLS O-F Correlation (January 2007) Strongly Reduced Model Error Odd Structure From Hoppel et al., 2008 Jan-Feb 2006 Average Black MLS Red SABER

MLS O-F Correlation (January 2007) Somewhat Reduced Model Error From Hoppel et al., 2008 Jan-Feb 2006 Average Black MLS Red SABER

Smoothed O-F Avg (Stratopause)

Smoothed O-F Avg (Stratopause)

Smoothed O-F Avg (Mesosphere)

Smoothed O-F Avg (Mesosphere)

T(K) North Pole Mesospheric Warming Minor Warming

Temperature Comparisons (North Pole) Low Vertical Resolution System Top GEOS-5 High-Altitude GEOS-5 Operational The GEOS-5 High-Altitude System fully resolves the stratospause and will lead to improved stratospause dynamics

Summary and Future Work The GEOS-5 system has been extended to the mesospause and is ready for studies of the dynamically changing stratopause Summary: 1. O-Fs decrease during mesospheric warming of Jan 2007 2. O-F biases are large in the tropics and upper mesosphere 3. Southern Hemisphere O F correlations show low peaks in the upper stratosphere and lower mesosphere, consistent with NOGAPS-ALPHA Future: Addition of SABER temperature profiles Addition of standard radiance observations to the high-altitude system Improvements in model bias and tropical forecasts GWD tuning Residual Circulation Diagnostics Assimilation during more active winters: 2006 and 2009 Assimilation of constituents (mesospheric CO from MLS)