The CFMU Network Operations 2011 The European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
Directorate Network Management Performance Monitoring Deployment coordination Network Operations Management Airspace AIS Data Mgt Network Network Technical Operations Systems Safety Airports Training Operations Planning Network Management Functions Integrated route network design Central function for frequencies SSR code allocation coordination Operations incl. ATFM
ATM Structure in Europe 41 States One single ATFCM System over Europe 59 En-route centres = 1750 Sectors 1348 Aircraft Operators 450 Airports 59 FMPs 4000+ connected end-users Peaks 34 400+ flights a day 10 000 000+ flights a year
Airspace data management To achieve this common view, all 40 countries which form part of the CFMU area of operations provide us their airspace data information. Static data such as air traffic control (ATC) sector boundaries and air routes (such as the maximum capacity for each airport and air traffic control sector) Dynamic data showing the availability of airspace, default ATC Capacities (for instance, number of runways available, availability of air traffic controllers ) and air-route availability based on foreseen military airspace usage.
Airspace Data Repository Digital NOTAM + Real Time data AUP/UUP NoN AIP +ATM data EAD CACD AIP data ADR seamless access from various sources Network view on planned & current status of airspace Access to archived data for post ops Access to draft data for simulation/ddr
Flight Planning Network Operations" : Single entry point which collects all flight plans in Europe. 2 central units Brussels and Bretigny (France) Distribution to all ACCs in CFMU area Establishment of accurate demand picture for ATC and ATFCM
Flight Plans Flight Planning EAD Aircraft Operators RPL ENV (AOs) / Air Traffic Services Reporting ORM FPL IFPS IFPU1 Brussels IFPU2 Brétigny FPL ATC FPL Changes Air Traffic Control (ATC) Offices (AROs) ATFCM System ETFMS EUROCONTROL1997 - Central Flow Management Unit URB\SEZ\085\1771\20.03.06
+- 62 000 MESSAGES/DAY IFPU1 Brussels (B) +-30 000 flights IFPU2 Brétigny (F) 45% 55% 23% RPL
ATFCM A pan-european network view shared with the local units responsible for air traffic control and devising solutions that optimise the handling of traffic flows according to the available capacity. This is done both on the day of the flight and by anticipating operations months in advance, by establishing a single network operations plan collectively agreed. Events that impact air traffic every day, whether they are planned - such as sporting events - or unpredictable, such as adverse weather conditions, aviation crises.
EUROCONTROL2004 - Central Flow Management Unit URB\SEZ\14.03.06 ATFCM 1 year 1 week real-time Traffic Forecast Resources - Airspace - ATC - Airport Feedback Strategic Flow & Capacity Planning Harmonised Planning considering : - Traffic Demand - Airspace Structure - ATC Capabilities - Airport Capabilities Feedback Optimised Capacity Management Optimised Daily Plan and anticipation of events in order to maintain the network stability. Feedback Tactical Flow & Capacity Management Reaction to realtime events to minimise disruptions impact and/or to take benefit of opportunities. Feedback Real-Time Operations - ATC - ASM - Airport - AOs
Strategic phase - From several months until one week before the flight. Assist the Air Navigation Service Providers (ANSPs) to predict what capacity they will need to provide in each of their air traffic control centres. In addition, a routing scheme is prepared a structure of air routes across Europe designed to balance the air traffic flows and maximise capacity. Pre-tactical phase - In the six days before the flight Coordinate and define the daily plan and inform Aircraft Operators and ATC units about the ATFCM measures that will be in force in European airspace on the following day. Optimise available capacity to meet forecast demand, manage demand to minimise delay and cost, and to publish the agreed plan for the day of operations after a collaborative decision making process. Tactical phase - On the day of the flight Optimisation of the capacity according to the demand across Europe, and delay management where aircraft are affected by a regulation in order to offer alternatives and minimise delay. Flights taking place on that day receive the benefit of ATFCM, which includes the allocation of individual aircraft departure times, re-routings to avoid bottlenecks and alternative flight profiles to maximise efficiency.
ATFCM Co-ordination - FMPs IS FI CFMU States (ATFM Area) Cooperating States (ATFM Adjacent Areas) NO DK SE LT EE LV RU IE PT ES MA GB NL DE BE CH FR DZ TN AT SI HR IT CZ PL SK HU RO BA RS ME MK BG AL GR MT BY UA MD TR CY HE IL SY LB GE AM AZ IQ KZ
Network ASM ATFCM Solution Such solutions require Network Wide implementation required by both ANSPs and AOs Before After
Network Operations ATFM ATFCM Network Operations Delay Capacity Flight Efficiency Emissions
Airport/TMA ATFM Delay Repartition in 2011 AIRPORT ATC CAPACITY 20% AIRPORT WEATHER 49% AIRPORT INFRASTRUCTURE 31% En-Route ATFM Delay Repartition in 2011 EN ROUTE ATC CAPACITY, 0.55 EN ROUTE ATC EN ROUTE WEATHER & EXTERNAL DISRUPTIONS, 0.13 EN ROUTE EVENTS, 0.03 STAFFING, 0.25 EN ROUTE ATC DISRUPTIONS, 0.05
Average Delay per Flight (min Breakdow n of All Delay Causes per Flight 15.0 12.0 9.0 14.7 m in 1.0 1.5 A T F M - 53 % 0.9 0.7 ATFM Ot her ATFM En- Rout e Primary Ot her 10.1 m in 6.0 3.0 12.2 O t her - 3 0 % 8.5 2010 2011
"Effective Capacity" flights per day (thousands ECAC "Effective Capacity" Evolution Per Month 2005-2011 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2005 Effective Capacity 25.2 25.5 25.2 27.3 25.8 26.0 25.5 26.6 27.3 25.6 25.9 25.0 2006 Effective Capacity 25.6 25.8 24.7 25.7 27.6 26.9 25.1 27.5 28.4 28.3 28.9 26.4 2007 Effective Capacity 26.7 27.3 27.5 27.9 28.3 26.7 27.0 29.0 29.3 28.6 26.9 24.7 2008 Effective Capacity 24.1 24.8 25.0 28.1 27.5 27.5 26.8 26.7 28.2 28.1 27.1 24.0 2009 Effective Capacity 24.2 27.3 27.5 28.5 28.5 27.5 26.3 27.7 29.1 27.0 25.1 21.7 2010 Effective Capacity 22.6 22.3 26.4 23.3 24.8 25.5 24.1 25.8 26.0 25.0 26.4 20.0 2011 Effective Capacity 25.4 27.2 28.2 27.6 28.2 27.8 27.4 27.8 28.0 26.8 28.1 26.7
Additional Pan European and Crisis management Functions SAFA Safety Alert of Foreign Aircraft AMON Arrival Monitoring Tool CSST - Call Sign Similarity Management Cell. CCAMS CRISIS MANAGEMENT
Call Sign Similarity (CSS) Tool ENV Profile Local Ref. Similarity Ref. Data Catalogue Rules Reference data & system parameters Rules Parameters CFMU/CSMC AO [file] Flight Schedule Constraints, Preferences CSS Tool 1. Load Schedule 2. Initialise ATC C/S 3. Quality Check 4a. Detect 4b. De-conflict 5. Accept [file] Flight Schedule With proposed ATC C/S Conflict List With Status: Resolved/Unresolved + reason Report AO Live Data Flight Schedule,Conflict List User param. & actions, etc 21
EACCC role Established through SES IR of the Network Manager Focal point for crises Alert on the crisis To call the right experts To propose measures / options to unlock / manage the crisis Communicate updated information to aviation community To ensure proper communication with media Build on lessons learnt to improve response to the next crisis Organise and participate in exercises to maintain the level of readiness Enter here your presentation title 22
DR/COM Crisis Support (logistics) DNM & EACCC Chief Operating Officer NOM Mgt NOM Mgr on Duty COM (or OPS SUP at night) Any authorised Source ANSPs/ States / Airports / FAA / Military / NATO N M C risis M a na gem e nt P ro ce dure (V 18) P R E- A L E R T P h a s e O P E R A T IO N A L P h a s e F M P s ( + o th e r a g e n cie s ) a r e in fo r m e d F M P s sta r t lo ca l co n tin g e n cy p la n s S e n d m e a su r e s to b e a p p lie d In fo r m D N M- C O M o n th e p r o b a b le in cid e n t (eg. S ta r t o f V o lc activity ) In fo r m D N M- C O M o n th e in cid e n t (eg. S ta r t o f e r u p tio n o r a le r t p h a se in E U R D E P ) C a ll N O M M g r /C O O ; a sse ss in cid e n t jo intly G a th e r in fo ; issu e A IM 1 In fo r m C O M 1 2 3 G a th e r in fo ; a sse ss w ith N O M M g r/c O O ; 4 issu e A IM 2 U p d a te N O P + h e a d lin e n e w s 5 C a ll in m o r e sta ff if n e e d e d ; ca ll C S O (se e ch e cklist ) ; a le r t A O L C 6 In fo r m a ffe cte d F M P s, r e le va n t e xt. a via tio n a g e n cie s (w h e n n e ce ssa r y ) C o n ta ct r e le va n t F M P s + r e ce ive m e a su re s 7 8 A p p ly m e a su re s 9 A sse ss in cid e n t w ith C O M a n d b r ie f C O O (if n o t ye t d o n e) 1 C a ll in N O M M g t+ d o m a in e xp e rts; jo in th is g r o u p 2 N G a th e r in fo ; a sse ss th e in cid e n t M e e t o n site 3 C r isis fo ca l p o in t: In fo r m DR/ C O M M o n ito r in cid e n t ; g a th e r in fo C o n ta ct S ta te fo ca l p o in ts o r in str u ct C r isis S u p to se n d in vita tio n In fo r m D G o n p r o g r e ss C o n ta ct in fo so u rce s like V A A C s 4 5 6 7 8 C o m p ile In str u ct to u p d N O P + A IM A sse ss in cid e n t w ith N O M M g t a n d C O M ; g a th e r in fo; In fo r m D N M 1 A ssig n : - C risis S u p p o r t r o le - C risis fo ca l p o in t fo r D R/C O M - C risis S p o ke sp e rso n(s ) fo r D R/C O M 2 C o n ta ct S ta te fo ca l p o in ts 3 C o n su lt E A C C C Co-C h a ir s 4 Jo in N O M M g t g rp 5 N E A C C C to b e co n ve n e d Y A sse ss in cid e n t ; g a th e r in fo 1 M a ke su r e th a t th e E A C C C co n f r o o m & lo g istics is a va ila b le & r e a d y 1 In vite (via S M S ) S ta te s fo r te le co n f 2 C o lle ct in fo via fo ca l p t; jo in O P S & E A C C C te le co n f M e e t w ith C o m m s C risis T e a u p d a te o n th e situ a tio n; d e cid e n e xt ste p s & r o le s a llo ca tio n p e r fo rm lo g istics ch e ck ; sta a va ila b ility ch e ck ; d e cid e o n n m e e tin g
NOP Unique tool for Planning, Collaborating, Information, Transacting
Real time situation display
Dynamic solutions