How To Write A Rubric For Online Instruction



Similar documents
Coffeyville Community College. Progress Report for Associate of Arts Online Delivery

How To Write An Online Course

2. Recognizing and Promoting Quality in Online Education

Online Course Rubrics, Appendix A in DE Handbook

Teaching with ilearn Innovation Award APPENDIX

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DEARBORN COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & COMPUTER SCIENCE ONLINE COURSE QUALITY MANAGEMENT GUIDING PRINCIPLES

Quality Guidelines for Online Courses

Exemplary Online Courses Michael W. Lindeman Updated: 6/10/2004

MJC Online Course Review Process DRAFT

Course Design Rubric for the Online Education Initiative

Categories Criteria Instructional and Audience Analysis. Prerequisites are clearly listed within the syllabus.

RUBRIC for Evaluating Online Courses

Measuring up to Quality Online Teaching

Online Course Standards Rubric

Online Course Development Guidelines and Rubric

Evaluation Rubric for Online Courses DUSON CIT Fellows June, 2004

DES MOINES AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL SERVICES PROCEDURES FACULTY

Blackboard Exemplary Course Program Rubric

Blended Course Evaluation Standards

Instructional Design Tips

Building Trust with Quality Assurance Strategies in TAACCCT

HCC ONLINE COURSE REVIEW RUBRIC

General Procedures for Developing an Online Course

Instructor Review: Delgado Community College Standards for Online Courses. The points are to help you understand how your course will be evaluated.

MOE Online Class Quality Guidelines

Course Standards. Support Standards. Institutional and Administrative Standards

TOOL KIT for RESIDENT EDUCATOR and MENT OR MOVES

Oglala Lakota College Teacher Preparation Program Instructional Unit Scoring Rubric

Teaching With Sakai Innovation Award Course/Project Submission Form

Online Course Development Guide and Review Rubric

Online Course Design Evaluation

Quality Standards for Online Learning

1. Instructional Design Elements a. Support & Resources Essential Criteria: 1. Students are provided information as to where to get technical help.

Course Evaluation: A Tool for Faculty

Distance Education Handbook

Instruction Design Tips for Online Learning

Online Instruction - Requirements and Reviewing Recommendations

Standards for Quality Online Teaching

Psychology 41 Life-Span Psychology from infancy to old age - Development Emily Bill for Winter 2016 Reviewed and

SVCC Exemplary Online Course Checklist

12 Step Checklist for Meeting Quality Matters Standard 2

With an increasing number

South Georgia State College Distance Learning Policy

12 Step Checklist for Meeting Quality Matters Standard 1

Online Course Self-Assessment Form

Online Course Checklist for Instructional Designers and Faculty Developers

TLE Observation and Evaluation Rubric Teachers

Educational Leadership Organizational Behavior 12 weeks

Online Teaching Evaluation for State Virtual Schools

Strengthening the Role of Part-Time Faculty in Community Colleges

Request for Proposal ecampus Technology Equipment Program

Distance Education Learning Resources Unit Document Title: Online Course Review Checklist Last Updated: July 17, 2013 by the DE Office Draft Final

Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana

COURSE ADMINISTRATION

Criteria for Evaluating Hybrid and Online Courses

Introduction The Student as a Representative of GCU Internship Outcomes Selecting a Mentor Internship... 4

UW-La Crosse Online Course Evaluation Guidelines

Assessment of Student Learning Plan (ASLP): ART Program

Course Design and Syllabus Construction

The Model of Successful School Nursing

SUNGARD SUMMIT 2007 sungardsummit.com 1

Coconino Community College Online Course Review Form

Cincinnati Christian University Foster School of Biblical Studies, Arts & Sciences

Equity-Minded Worksheet for Instructors of Online Courses

Evaluating Students in the Classroom Faculty Development Conference February 2007 D. P. Shelton, MSN, RN, CNE, EdD (c)

National Standards for Quality Online Teaching

HCC Online Course Evaluation Rubric July, 2011

Distance Learning Policy With Proposed Procedures

LEARNING, DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY CAPSTONE PROJECT GUIDELINES

FACULTY PEER ONLINE CLASSROOM OBSERVATIONS AA

Master Technology Teacher Standards

Virtual Programs and Assessment in Graduate Teacher Education. Nedra Atwell Marge Maxwell Western Kentucky University. Abstract

SLN Course Quality Rubric for Formal Course Review of New Online Faculty/Courses

Standards for Quality Online Courses Educational Technology Cooperative

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN-DEARBORN COLLEGE OF BUSINESS CREATION, MAINTENANCE, AND QUALITY MANAGEMENT OF ONLINE COURSES

RUBRIC ASSESSMENT: Online Educators

VALIDATION OF PREPAREDNESS TO TEACH ONLINE

Peer Review. Margarita Bianco

Professional Online Educator: Instructional Design for Online Learning Environments 12 weeks

Cowboy Quality Online Course Evaluation (Title III) Version 3.0 Course Title Goes Here Total Score=0%

University of West Georgia 5-Star Online Course Review

RATING A TEACHER OBSERVATION TOOL. Five ways to ensure classroom observations are focused and rigorous

DISTANCE EDUCATION. References: Title 5 Sections et seq.; ACCJC Accreditation Standard, II.A.1

1. Standard I: Content Knowledge, Skills, and Concepts for Instructional Technology

Faculty Driven Standards of Excellence for Online and Technology-Enhanced Courses

Competency-Based Education: A Framework for Measuring Quality Courses

Mississippi Statewide Teacher Appraisal Rubric M-STAR

Georgia Perimeter College Faculty Senate Course Change

Assuring that the Online Course is Ready for Prime Time

As a self-evaluation tool, simply apply the quality standards in the rubric to your own course.

Please see current textbook prices at

Teacher Rubric with Suggested Teacher and Student Look-fors

Pennsylvania Core Competencies for Instructors Self Assessment Checklist

Competencies There are three units in this course. At the completion of these units, students will be able to:

Online Instructional Materials for Universal Web Accessibility

LITERACY: READING LANGUAGE ARTS

ART AND DESIGN. Syllabus for Primary Schools. Curriculum Department, Floriana

NEW YORK STATE TEACHER CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS

Undergraduate Academic Assessment Plan

Teaching in Higher Education

Transcription:

Rubric for Online Instruction Rationale California State University, Chico's first strategic priority is to create and enhance high quality learning environments. Academic technologies, especially online or web-enhanced courses, have a significant role in the creation of those learning environments. The University's Strategic Priorities challenge faculty and staff to use academic technologies to create and enhance high quality learning environments in a demonstrable manner. What should a quality online course look like? Chico s Rubric for Online Instruction offers a framework for addressing this question. Use of this rubric represents a developmental process for online course design and delivery, and provides a means for an instructor to self-assess course(s) based on University expectations. Furthermore, the rubric provides a means for supporting and recognizing a faculty member's effort in developing expertise in online instruction as part of our commitment to high quality learning environments. The Rubric for Online Instruction can be used in three ways. 1. As a course "self-evaluation" tool - advising instructors how to revise an existing course to the Rubric for Online Instruction. 2. As a way to design a new course for the online environment, following the rubric as a road map. 3. As a means for getting recognition for exemplary online instruction - going through a nomination/recognition process on campus. Faculty can receive recognition to go in their RTP file. Historical Perspective The process by which faculty and staff came together to write this rubric is available for your review. This describes the history and work of a dedicated committee. The Rubric for Online Instruction initiated the Exemplary Online Instruction Awards, a recognition made public at the annual CELT Conference at CSU, Chico. The website demonstrates examples of exemplary online instruction and is available for viewing. License This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.

Category 1 Learner Support & Resources A. Course contains limited information for online learner support and links to campus resources. A. Course contains adequate information for online learner support and links to campus resources. A. Course contains extensive information about being an online learner and links to campus resources. B. Course provides limited course-specifi c resources, limited contact information for instructor, department, and/or program. B. Course provides adequate course-specifi c resources, some contact information for instructor, department, and program. B. Course provides a variety of course-specifi c resources, contact information for instructor, department, and program. C. Course offers limited resources supporting course content and different learning abilities. C. Course offers access to adequate resources supporting course content and different learning abilities. C. Course offers access to a wide range of resources supporting course content and different learning abilities.

Category 2 Online Organization & Design A. Much of the course is under construction, with some key components identifi ed such as the syllabus. A. Course is organized and navigable. Students can understand the key components and structure of the course. A. Course is well-organized and easy to navigate. Students can clearly understand all components and structure of the course. B. Course syllabus is unclear about what is expected of students. B. Course syllabus identifi es and delineates the role the online environment will play in the course. B. Course syllabus identifi es and clearly delineates the role the online environment will play in the total course. C. Aesthetic design does not present and communicate course information clearly. C. Aesthetic design presents and communicates course information clearly. C. Aesthetic design presents and communicates course information clearly throughout the course. D. Web pages are inconsistent both visually and functionally. D. Most web pages are visually and functionally consistent. D. All web pages are visually and functionally consistent throughout the course. E. Accessibility issues are not addressed. (Including: sight, mobility, hearing, cognition, ESL, and technical.) E. Accessibility issues are briefl y addressed. (Including: sight, mobility, hearing, cognition, ESL, and technical.) E. Accessibility issues are addressed throughout the course. (Including: sight, mobility, hearing, cognition, ESL, and technical.)

Category 3 Instructional Design & Delivery A. Course offers limited opportunity for interaction and communication student to student, student to instructor and student to content. B. Course goals are not clearly defi ned and do not align to learning objectives. C. Learning objectives are vague or incomplete and learning activities are absent or unclear. D. Course provides limited visual, textual, kinesthetic and/or auditory activities to enhance student learning and accessibility. E. Course provides limited activities to help students develop critical thinking and/ or problem-solving skills. A. Course offers adequate opportunities for interaction and communication student to student, student to instructor and student to content. B. Course goals are adequately defi ned but may not align to learning objectives. C. Learning objectives are identifi ed and learning activities are implied. D. Course provides adequate visual, textual, kinesthetic and/or auditory activities to enhance student learning and accessibility. E. Course provides adequate activities to help students develop critical thinking and/or problem-solving skills. A. Course offers ample opportunities for interaction and communication student to student, student to instructor and student to content. B. Course goals are clearly defi ned and aligned to learning objectives. C. Learning objectives are identifi ed and learning activities are clearly integrated. D. Course provides multiple visual, textual, kinesthetic and/or auditory activities to enhance student learning and accessibility. E. Course provides multiple activities that help students develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills.

Category 4 Assessment & Evaluation of Student Learning A. Course has limited activities to assess student readiness for course content and mode of delivery. A. Course has adequate activities to assess student readiness for course content and mode of delivery. A. Course has multiple timely and appropriate activities to assess student readiness for course content and mode of delivery. B. Learning objectives, instructional and assessment activities are not aligned. C. Assessment strategies are limited in use to measure content knowledge, attitudes, and skills. D. Opportunities for students to receive feedback about their own performance are infrequent and sporadic. E. Students self-assessments and/or peer feedback opportunities are limited. B. Learning objectives, instructional and assessment activities are adequately aligned. C. Ongoing strategies are used to measure content knowledge, attitudes, and skills. D. Opportunities for students to receive feedback about their own performance are provided. E. Students self-assessments and/or peer feedback opportunities exist. B. Learning objectives, instructional and assessment activities are closely aligned. C. Ongoing multiple assessment strategies are used to measure content knowledge, attitudes, and skills. D. Regular feedback about student performance is provided in a timely manner throughout the course. E. Students self-assessments and peer feedback opportunities exist throughout the course.

Category 5 Innovative Teaching with Technology A. Course uses limited technology tools to facilitate communication and learning. A. Course uses adequate technology tools to facilitate communication and learning. A. Course uses a variety of technology tools to appropriately facilitate communication and learning. B. New teaching methods applied to enhance student learning are limited. B. New teaching methods are adequately applied to innovatively enhance student learning. B. New teaching methods are applied and innovatively enhance student learning, and interactively engage students. C. There are limited multimedia elements and/or learning objects for accommodating different learning styles. C. Multimedia elements and/ or learning objects are used and are relevant to accommodate different learning styles. C. A variety of multimedia elements and/or learning objects are used and are relevant to accommodate different learning styles throughout the course. D. Course uses Internet access and engages students in the learning process in a very limited way. D. Course optimizes Internet access and effectively engages students in the learning process. D. Course optimizes Internet access and effectively engages students in the learning process in a variety of ways throughout the course.

Category 6 Faculty Use of Student Feedback A. Instructor offers limited opportunity for students to give feedback to faculty on course content. A. Instructor offers adequate to give feedback on course content. A. Instructor offers multiple to give feedback on course content. B. Instructor offers limited opportunity for students to give feedback on ease of online technologyand accessibility of course. B. Instructor offers adequate to give feedback on ease of online technology and accessibility of course. B. Instructor offers multiple to give feedback on ease of online technology and accessibility of course. C. Instructor uses student feedback to help plan instruction and assessment of student learning for the next semester in a limited way. C. Instructor requests and uses student feedback a couple times during the semester to help plan instruction and assessment of student learning for the rest of the semester. C. Instructor uses formal and informal student feedback in an ongoing basis to help plan instruction and assessment of student learning throughout the semester.