1 Online Course Evaluation Rubric This evaluation tool specifically focuses on course design, rather than on course delivery or course academic content. The rubric is intended to be used for courses that are delivered fully online. The rubric can be used as a peer review tool OR as a self-evaluation tool. As a peer-review tool, you can request the support of your fellow colleagues to a form a review team which will review and evaluate your online course. To request that your course undergo a peer review, please contact the Instructional Technology Department. We require that your course be fully developed and be delivered at least three semesters before requesting a peer review. The purpose of this requirement is that most courses work out obvious design and navigation flaws when offered to a live audience at least three times. As a self-evaluation tool, simply apply the quality standards in the rubric to your own course. Scoring The following rubric consists of 40 standards. Each standard has a point value of 1,2 or 3 depending on its relative importance. Rate each standard by deciding whether or not the course meets the standard (i.e., either "yes" the course meets the standard, or "no" it doesn't.) There is no partial credit for almost meeting the standard. There are 14 standards with a 3-point value (highlighted in blue.) These 3-pont standards are considered essential, and therefore must be met in order to meet quality expectations. In addition, an overall score of 68 must be achieved to meet quality standards. To clarify, a course meets quality expectations if: 1) answered "yes" to all 3-point standards 2) received an overall total score of 68.
2 I. COURSE OVERVIEW AND INTRODUCTION The overall design of the course, navigational information, as well General Review Standard: as course, instructor and student information are made transparent to the student at the beginning of the course. Specific Review Standards: Points Annotation: What s the idea? I.1 Navigational instructions make the organization of the course easy to understand. 3 Instructions provide a general course overview, guide the new student to explore the course website, and indicate what to do first, rather than list detailed navigational instructions for the whole course. Instructors may choose to incorporate some of this information in the course syllabus. If so, students should be directed to the syllabus at the beginning of the course. A useful idea is a Read Me First or Start Here button or icon on the course home page, linking students to start-up information. -A course "tour" -Clear statements about how to get started in the course -A "Scavenger hunt" assignment that leads students through an exploration of the different areas of the course I.2 A statement introduces the student to the course and to the structure of the student learning. 3 The instructor s statement gives the new student an idea of how the learning process is structured including schedule, communications modes, types of activities, and assessments. These features are often found in the course syllabus. Look for some or all of the following: -The course schedule (self-paced, following a set calendar, etc.) -Course sequencing, such as a linear or random order -Types of activities the student will be required to complete (written assignments, online self-tests, participation in the discussion board, group work, etc.) -Course calendar with assignment and test due dates -Preferred mode of communication with the instructor ( , discussion board, etc.) -Preferred mode of communication with other students -Testing procedures (online, proctored, etc.) -Procedure for submission of electronic assignments
3 I.3 Netiquette expectations with regard to discussions and communication are clearly stated. 2 Expectations of student conduct online are clearly stated, however brief or elaborate they may be. The expectations themselves are not evaluated. -Rules of conduct for participating in the discussion board -Rules of conduct for content - Speaking style requirements, (i.e. use of correct English required as opposed to net acronyms) -Spelling and grammar expectations, if any I.4 The self-introduction by the instructor is appropriate. 1 The initial introduction creates a sense of connection between the instructor and the students. It should present the instructor as professional as well as approachable, and include more than the essentials, such as the instructor s name, title, field of expertise, address and phone. The self introduction helps students get to know the instructor. It could include: The self introduction helps students get to know the instructor. It could include: -Information on teaching philosophy -Past experiences with teaching online classes -Personal information such as hobbies, etc. -A photograph I.5 Students are requested to introduce themselves to the class. 1 The student introduction helps to create a supportive learning environment and a sense of community. Students are asked to introduce themselves and given guidance on where and how they should do so. Student introductions themselves are not evaluated. Instructors may ask students to answer specific questions (such as why they are taking the course, what concerns they have, what they expect to learn, etc.) or may choose to let the student decide. Instructors may provide an example of an introduction and/or start the process by introducing themselves.
4 I.6 Minimum technology requirements, minimum student skills, and, if applicable, prerequisite knowledge in the discipline, are clearly stated. 1 Explanations of technical requirements and skills, and prerequisite knowledge and skills may be found within the course, in documents linked to the course, or in supporting material not on the course site. Look for a link to that content and/or a reminder of it for the entering student. Technology requirements may include information on: -Hardware -Software and plug-ins -ISP requirements Examples of technology skills may include the capability to: -Use with attachments -Save file in commonly used word processing program formats (e.g. MS Word) -Use MS Excel or other spreadsheet programs Discipline knowledge prerequisites should include academic course prerequisites.
5 II. LEARNING OBJECTIVES (COMPETENCIES) General Review Standard: Learning objectives are clearly defined and explained. They assist the student to focus learning activities. II.1 Specific Review Standards: Points Annotation: What s the idea? The learning objectives of the 3 Measurable learning objectives ensure instructors course describe outcomes that precisely describe what students are to gain from are measurable. instruction, and then guide instructors to accurately assess student accomplishment. Objectives should describe student performance in specific, observable terms. If this is not possible, (e.g., internal cognition, affective changes), check for clear indications that the learning objective is meaningfully assessed. Special situations: In some cases, objectives for the course are institutionally mandated and the individual instructor does not have the authority to change them. For such cases, this standard should be considered as met for scoring purposes. Examples of measurable objectives: -Select appropriate tax strategies for different financial and personal situations -Develop a comprehensive, individualized wellness action program focused on overcoming a sedentary lifestyle
6 II.2 II.3 II.4 The learning objectives address content mastery, critical thinking skills, and core learning skills. The learning objectives of the course are clearly stated and understandable to the student. Instructions to students on how to meet the learning objectives are adequate and easy to understand. 3 Examine the learning objectives (course and unit level) as a whole for all three types of skill. Every single objective may not contain all three components. Content mastery should be appropriate for the type and level of the course. Ask the Subject Matter Expert (SME) for guidance. Critical thinking skills may include the ability to: -Distinguish between fact and opinion -Distinguish between primary and secondary sources -Identify bias and stereotypes -Evaluate information sources for point of view, accuracy, usefulness, timeliness, etc. -Recognize deceptive arguments Core learning skills may include: -Written and oral communication skills -Manipulation and organization of information in various ways or using different tools -Understanding what one knows and how one knows it, and also understanding what one does not know and what one needs to find it out. 2 Students can easily grasp the meaning of the learning objectives. Use of jargon, confusing terms, unnecessarily complex language, and puzzling syntax are avoided. Special situations: In some cases, objectives for the course are institutionally mandated and the individual instructor does not have the authority to change them. For such cases, this standard should be considered as met for scoring purposes. 2 Instructions may take various forms (e.g. narratives, bulleted lists, charts) and may appear at different levels within the course, such as module-based or weekly assignment sheets. Instructions are clear and complete. -Module-based or weekly assignment pages in narrative, bulleted list, or chart form, indicate a list of steps that guide the student to meet learning objectives for each week -Information indicates which learning activities, resources, assignments, and assessments support the learning objectives
7 II.5 The learning objectives of the course are articulated and specified on the module/unit level. 2 Module or unit level objectives may be written by the instructor or come from the textbook. If no module or unit level objectives are found or referenced on the website, reviewers should communicate with the instructor to gather more information. III. ASSESSMENT AND MEASUREMENT General Review Standard: Assessment strategies use established ways to measure effective learning, assess student progress by reference to stated learning objectives, and are designed as essential to the learning process. III.1 Specific Review Standards: Points Annotation: What s the idea? The types of assessments 3 Assessments, learning objectives, and learning activities selected measure the stated align in a clear and direct way. The assessment formats learning objectives and are provide a reasonable way to measure the stated consistent with course activities learning objectives. and resources. Examples of inconsistency: III.2 The grading policy is transparent and easy to understand. -The objective is to be able to write a persuasive essay but the assessment is a multiple choice test. -The objective is to demonstrate discipline-specific information literacy and the assessment is a rubricscored term paper, but students are not given any practice with information literacy skills on smaller assignments. Examples of objective/assessment alignment: -A problem analysis evaluates critical thinking skills -Multiple choice quiz tests vocabulary knowledge -A composition assesses writing skills Some assessments may be geared towards meeting objectives other than those stated in the course; for example, a course may have a writing component as part of a college-wide Writing Across the Curriculum requirement. In that case suggest including appropriate objectives in the course. (Note: Learning Objectives may be called Learning Outcomes.) 3 Review the clarity of presentation to the student, not the simplicity or complexity of a given grading system itself. A relatively complex grading system can still be unambiguous and easy to understand. Example: -A list of all activities, tests, etc. that will affect the students grade is included at the beginning of the course.
8 III.3 III.4 III.5 Assessment and measurement strategies provide feedback to the student. The types of assessments selected and the methods used for submitting assessments are appropriate for the distance learning environment. Self-check or practice types of assignments are provided for quick student feedback. 3 Students learn more effectively if they receive frequent, meaningful, and rapid feedback. This feedback may come from the instructor directly, from assignments and assessments that have feedback built into them, or even from other students. -Instructor participation in a discussion assignment -Writing assignments that require submission of a draft for instructor comment and suggestions for improvement -Self-mastery tests and quizzes that include informative feedback with each answer choice -Interactive games and simulation that have feedback built in 2 Assessments make use of the technologies and security typically found in an online classroom. Examples that DO meet the standard: -Submission of text or media files by or drop box -Exams given in a proctored testing center -Quizzes with time limitations, printing disabled, and other security measures -Multiple assessments which enable the instructor to become familiar with individual students work and which discourage proxy cheating (someone other than the student completing and submitting work) Examples that do NOT meet the standard: -Required assessments that cannot be submitted online, such as a lab practicum in a science course. -A course in which the entire set of assessments consists of 5 multiple choice tests taken online, with no enforced time limit, the print function enabled, and minimal security features in place. 1 Students have ample opportunity to measure their own learning progress. Look for examples of self-check quizzes and activities, as well as other types of practice opportunities that provide rapid feedback. These types of assignments should be voluntary or allow multiple attempts. -Practice quizzes -Games, simulations, and other interactive exercises -Practice written assignments -Peer reviews
9 IV. RESOURCES AND MATERIALS General Review Standard: Instructional materials are sufficiently comprehensive to achieve announced objectives and learning outcomes and are prepared by qualified persons competent in their fields. (Materials, other than standard textbooks produced by recognized publishers, are prepared by the instructor or distance educators skilled in preparing materials for distance learning.) IV.1 IV.2 Specific Review Standards: Points Annotation: What s the idea? The instructional materials 3 Instructions should provide meaningful content in a support the stated learning variety of ways, including the textbook, PowerPoint objectives and have sufficient presentations, websites, lecture notes, outlines, and breadth and depth for the student multimedia. to learn the subject. Decisions on this standard may be particularly difficult for individual reviewers whose expertise is not in the course discipline. Reviewers should consult with the SME (subject matter expert) and use common sense to determine if the content is robust enough to support the course. Instructional materials are presented in a format appropriate to the online environment, and are easily accessible to and usable by the student. 3 Students who have the required technical equipment and software can view the materials online. If some of the course resources, including textbooks, videos, CD-ROMs, etc., are unavailable within the framework of the course website, determine how students would gain access to them and examine their ease of use. -Textbooks and/or CDs, if used, include titles, authors, publishers, ISBN numbers, copyright dates, and information as to where copies can be obtained -A navigation button is devoted to Resources and appropriately tied in with the overall course design -Required software plug-ins are listed, along with instructions for obtaining and installing the plug-ins Examples of some visual format problems: -Text size may be too inconsistent for typical View/Text Size setting -Large text files are presented without table of contents or unit numbering -Multimedia files require plug-ins or codecs students do not have -Science lab courses may include learning activities that are not easy to format for online learning
10 IV.3 IV.4 The purpose of the course elements (content, instructional methods, technologies, and course materials) is evident. The instructional materials, including supporting materials - such as manuals, videos, CD ROMs, and computer software are consistent in organization. 2 Students can easily determine the purpose of all materials, technologies and methods used in the course and know which materials are required and which are recommended resources. For example, a course may be richly garnished with external links to Internet resources, but it is not clear whether those resources are for background information, additional personal enrichment, or required for an assignment. -Links to external web sites indicate the purpose of the links or are completely self-evident. -The functions of animated games or exercises are clearly explained or are completely self-evident. 1 Online courses often use multiple types of instructional materials. Students can easily understand how the materials relate to each other. The level of detail in supporting materials is appropriate for the level of the course. For example, a course requires students to use the following materials: a textbook divided into chapters, video segments ordered by topics, a website organized around specific skills, and a tutorial CD-ROM that has an opening menu consisting of practice quizzes, images, and audio examples. Reviewers would need to determine if such diversely formatted course materials are integrated well enough to be useful to the uninitiated student. Example: -An introductory Gen Ed course does not require materials meant for upper level intensive study in a major. Decisions on this standard may be particularly difficult for individual reviewers whose expertise is not in the course discipline. Reviewers should consult with the SME (subject matter expert) and use common sense to determine if the materials are appropriate to the course.
11 IV.5 All resources and materials used in the online course are appropriately cited. 1 Materials created by the instructor and those borrowed from other sources are distinctly identified. Text, images, graphic materials, tables, videos, audios, websites, and other forms of multimedia are appropriately referenced according to the institution s copyright and intellectual property policy. Courses that use an e-pack or course cartridge may provide a blanket statement acknowledging that a significant portion of the course materials came from the publisher rather than include individual citations for each instance of publisher materials. IV. LEARNER INTERACTION General Review Standard: The effective design of instructor-student interaction, meaningful student cooperation, and student-content interaction is essential to student motivation, intellectual commitment and personal development. Specific Review Standards: Points Annotation: What s the idea? V.1 The learning activities promote the achievement of stated objectives and learning outcomes. 3 Learning activities are various including class discussions, case studies, simulation exercise, practice quizzes, tests, etc. Activities align with and support the learning objectives. Most of the objectives can reasonably be achieved by students completing the learning activities. Examples of mismatches between activities and objectives: -The objective requires students to be able to deliver a persuasive speech, but the activities in the course do not include practice of that skill -The objective is Prepare each budget within a master budget and explain their importance in the overall budgeting process. The students review information about this in their texts, observe budgets worked out by the instructor, and produce only one of the several budgets
12 V.2 Learning activities foster instructor-student, contentstudent, and if appropriate to this course, student-student interaction. 3 All online courses should include interaction between the instructor and the students and between the students and the content. The degree and type of student-to-student interaction may vary with the discipline and the level of the course. Examples of learning activities that foster the following types of interaction: Instructor student (consider for ALL courses): Selfintroduction; discussion postings and responses; feedback on project assignments; evidence of one-toone communication, etc. Student content (consider for ALL courses): Essays, term papers, group projects, etc. based on readings, videos, and other course content; self-assessment exercises; group work products, etc. Student student (if appropriate to this course): Selfintroduction exercise; group discussion postings; group projects; peer critiques, etc. Refer to the Instructor Worksheet to determine if student-student interaction is appropriate for this course. If the Worksheet indicates that such interaction is appropriate then consider this in deciding if this standard is met. If the Worksheet indicates that such interaction is not appropriate, then focus only on instructor-student and student-content interaction to decide whether this standard has been met. Where possible, include recommendations and comments where student-student interaction can be incorporated in this course. V.3 Clear standards are set for instructor response and availability (turn-around time for , grade posting, etc.) 3 Information clearly indicates how quickly the instructor will respond, when feedback will be provided, and when the instructor is available to meet. Information clearly indicates instructor response time for key events and interactions, including turnaround time, time required for grade postings, discussion postings, etc. Standards also include instructor availability, including response time, degree of participation in discussions, and availability via other media (phone, in-person) if applicable. This standard does not prescribe what that response time and availability ought to be.
13 V.4 The requirements for course interaction are clearly articulated. V.5 The course design prompts the instructor to be present, active, and engaged with the students. 2 A clear statement of requirements should indicate the criteria for interaction. For example, students required to participate in discussions are told how many times each week they must post original comments, how many times they must post responses to other s comments, what the quality of the comments must be, how the comments will be evaluated, what grade credit they can expect for various levels of performance, and whether the interaction is required or optional. 2 Students know that the instructor is approachable and will regularly interact with them. Opportunities for interaction will vary with the discipline of the course. An actively used and well organized instructorfacilitated discussion board Optional electronic office hours provided in the chat room or chat sessions on selected topics, archived/edited and posted as a FAQ for other students An invitation for the class to the instructor with individual concerns Current announcements, either in the classroom or via VI. COURSE TECHNOLOGY General Review Standard: To enhance student learning, course technology enriches instruction and fosters student interactivity. VI.1 Specific Review Standards: Points Annotation: What s the idea? The tools and media support the 3 Tools and media used in the course support related learning objectives of the course learning objectives, and are integrated with texts and and are integrated with texts and lesson assignments. Students know how the tools and lesson assignments. media support the assignments and how they support the learning objectives. Technology is not used simply for the sake of using technology. For example, a course might require viewing video materials, but it may not be clear how the video materials illustrate or support any learning objective.
14 VI.2 The tools and media enhance student interactivity and guide the student to become a more active learner. 2 Tools and media used in the course help students actively engage in the learning process, rather than passively absorbing information. Automated self-check exercises requiring student response Animations, simulations, and games that require student input Software that tracks student interaction and progress Use of discussion tools with automatic notification or read/unread tracking feature VI.3 VI.4 VI.5 VI.6 Technologies required for this course are either provided or easily downloadable. The tools and media are compatible with existing standards of delivery modes. Instructions on how to access resources at a distance are sufficient and easy to understand. Course technologies take advantage of existing economies and efficiencies of delivery. 2 For this standard, the term technologies may cover a range of plug-ins such as Acrobat Reader, media players, etc. In addition, courses may require special software packages (spreadsheets, math calculators etc.). Clear instructions tell students how to obtain needed plug-ins and software packages. 1 Course tools, media, and delivery modes meet current standards for widespread accessibility. For example, if most students have access to DVD players or use streaming media, use of those delivery modes in an online class meets this standard. If the typical student cannot be expected to have access to a technology at his or her out-of-the box home computer off campus, that technology should probably not be used in the course. 1 Online students need to know about and be able to obtain access to educational resources by remote access. Information on these resources is readily visible with clear instructions on how to access these resources. The instructor mails to students a custom CD he has prepared for the course An explanation of how to obtain full text journal articles is provided in the assignment that requires their use 1 As innovative technologies appear on the market all the time, online course technology should be current. Courses not recently developed may need to be updated. (Check the Instructor Worksheet). Example: Using compressed files to reduce file downloading time Delivering Audio files in a common file type such as Windows Media or RealPlayer
15 VII. LEARNER SUPPORT General Review Standard: Courses are effectively supported for students through fully accessible modes of delivery, resources, and student support. VII.1 Specific Review Standards: Points Annotation: What s the idea? The course instructions articulate 2 Technical support for online students differs from or link to a clear description of institution to institution. Technical support includes the technical support offered. information about such topics as how to log in, how to use the software, and how to upload files. It does not include help with course content, assignments, academic or student support services (see Standards VII.2 and VII.3 below). Look for evidence that students have access to technical support services from within the course. The purpose is not to review the adequacy of those services on an institutional level. VII.2 Course instructions articulate or link to an explanation of how the institution s academic support system can assist the student in effectively using the resources provided. A clear description of the services, including a link to a technical support website An link to an online learning helpdesk A phone number for an online learning helpdesk 2 Academic support for online students, and the scope of what academic support entails, differs from institution to institution. For the purposes of review, academic support includes access to library resources, readiness assessment, testing services, tutoring, a writing center, a math center, supplemental instruction programs, and teaching assistants. Look for evidence that students have access to academic support services from within the course. The purpose is not to review the adequacy of those services on an institutional level. A clear description of the academic support services and how to access them. A link to the academic support website, along with a definition of academic support
16 VII.3 VII.4 Course instructions articulate or link to an explanation of how the institution s student support services can assist the student in effectively using the resources provided. Course instructions articulate or link to tutorials and resources that answer basic questions related to research, writing, technology etc. 1 Student support services for online students, and the scope of what such support entails, differs from institution to institution. For the purposes of this review, student support services include advising, registration, financial aid, student life, counseling, etc. Look for evidence that students have access to student support services from within the course. The purpose is not to review the adequacy of those services on an institutional level. A clear description of student support services and how to access them A link to the student support website, along with a definition of student support services 1 Online students access to tutorials and help files related to writing, technology, research, etc. differs from institution to institution. This item does NOT refer to: Students getting help from another person Tutorials and resources specifically related to course content Look for evidence that students taking the course DO have access to those support services from within the course, for example, a clear description of the tutorials available and how to get them. VIII. ACCESSIBILITY General Review Standard: The course is accessible to all students. VIII.1 Specific Review Standards: Points Annotation: What s the idea? The course acknowledges the 3 All online courses should direct students to the importance of ADA requirements. institution s Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) services on their campus. There should be a statement in the course that tells students how to gain access to ADA services at their institution. To meet this standard a course must have both a statement that tells students how to gain access to an institution s ADA services AND be on an approved Course Management System (Blackboard, WebCT, or WebTycho) or documentation provided by the CMS that it is ADA compliant. Encourage faculty to consult the office on their campus that provides disability services for the wording of an ADA Statement appropriate to their institution.
17 VIII.2 VIII.3 VIII.4 Web pages provide equivalent alternatives to auditory and visual content. Web pages have links that are self-describing and meaningful. The course demonstrates sensitivity to readability issues. 1 Alternative means of access to course information are provided for the vision or hearing impaired student, such as, equivalent textual representations of images, audio, animations, and video in the course website. Presenting information in text format is generally acceptable because screen reader software (used by the vision impaired) can read text. Audio lecture has a text transcript available Video clip, image, or animation is accompanied by text transcript 1 Instructors provide links to Internet content that includes useful descriptions of what students will find at those sites. These descriptions enable the vision impaired student to use screen reader software to understand links. All file names and web hyperlinks have meaningful names. For instance, the link to take a quiz should say Take Quiz 1, not click here Icons used as links should also have HTML tags or an accompanying text link 1 The course employs appropriate font, color, and spacing to facilitate readability and minimize distractions for the student. Formatting such as bold or italics in addition to color coding text Web page provided in an alternate, non-color-coded format Formatting and color coding serve instructional purposes. For example, format and color are used purposefully to communicate key points, group like items and emphasize relevant relationships, etc. The Quality Matters program is sponsored by MarylandOnline, and was supported in part by the Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education (FIPSE), U.S. Department of Education.
GUIDE TO ONLINE COURSE DESIGN AND QUALITY STANDARDS CELT and DCS have adapted the 2003-2006 (public domain) versions of the Quality Matters online course design rubric, developed by Maryland Online with
Guidelines Online Course Design Rubric Based on the Quality Matters 05/06 Rubric NMSU Teaching Academy As a form of self-review, you may want to apply this rubric yourself to your online course. Your written
HCC ONLINE COURSE REVIEW RUBRIC Adapted from Maryland Online FIPSE Project and Lake Superior College I. COURSE OVERVIEW AND INTRODUCTION General Review Standard: The overall design of the course, navigational
Psychology 41 Life-Span Psychology from infancy to old age - Development Emily Bill for Winter 2016 Reviewed 10-5-15 and 10-6-15 Los Angeles Mission College Distance Education Technical Review Rubric of
ACADEMIC AFFAIRS ONLINE COURSE DEVELOPMENT: CGS Standards of Good Practice INSTRUCTOR S GUIDE AY 16 Congratulations! We are very pleased that you have been assigned to develop and teach an online course
HCC Course Evaluation Rubric July, 2011 Instructor s Name(s): Observer/Supervisor: Course Number: Department: College: Date: This HCC Course Evaluation Rubric is one of several data sources for evaluating
Online Course Rubrics, Appendix A in DE Hbook Distance Education Course sites must meet Effective Level scores to meet Distance Education Criteria. Distance Education Course Sites will be reviewed a semester
12 Step Checklist for Meeting Quality Matters Standard 1 Getting Started 1.1 Instructions make clear how to get started and where to find various course components. 1.2 Students are introduced to the purpose
Instructional Design Tips Category 1 Learner Support and Resources Information about being an online/hybrid learner Tips for being an online/hybrid student Quiz to self-assess readiness to be an online/hybrid
12 Step Checklist for Meeting Quality Matters Standard 1 Getting Started 1.1 Instructions make clear how to get started and where to find various course components. 1.2 Learners are introduced to the purpose
University of West Georgia 5-Star Online Course Review Three copies must be completed: one by instructor, one by peer, and one by DDEC. All three must reach satisfy scoring requirements (at bottom) for
Online courses are approved by the University of California in two steps: Online Course Self-Assessment Form 1. Assessment against International Association for K-12 Online Learning (inacol) course standards.
Checklist of Competencies for Effective Online Teaching 1. Instructional Principles Audience Analysis Who are your learners? What is their reason for taking your class? What is their preparation for success
Instruction Design Tips for Online Learning Instructional Design Tips for Online Learning was developed by Joan Van Duzer of Humboldt State University to be used in conjunction with the Rubric for Online
Shawnee Community College Quality Online Course Initiative An institutional assessment tool to assist in the design of online courses and programs. 1 Instructional Design Instructional design refers to
Online Course Development Guide and Review Rubric Thank you for participating in our online course review process! Your input is extremely valuable to us, and we appreciate the time you are taking to help
Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana POLICY TITLE Distance Education Course Design and Development POLICY NUMBER ASOM 6.0 (Formerly APPM 5. & 5.) PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY Instructional Design CREATION /
General Procedures for Developing an Online Course General Procedures for Developing an Online Course Questions to Ask before you Begin Analysis 1. What is your learner audience? Is the course for beginners
THE CHECK A Guide to Online Course Design The Check is a guide to help CEHD instructors create instructionally effective and user-friendly online learning environments for students (online courses, hybrid
The Check: A Guide to Online Course Design The Check was created by CEHD s Academic Technology Services Team: Treden Wagoner Sheila Hoover Thomas Nechodomu Constance Pepin Lyn DeLorme Melissa Falldin Last
A tool to assist in the design, redesign, and/or evaluation of online courses. An Initiative Sponsored By: Illinois Online Network (ION) University of Illinois Quality Online Course Initiative Rubric by
Effective Practices for Fully Online and Blended Courses Initial Course Development Below are some tips and strategies for initial development and conceptualization of your course: Blueprint your course.
Online Course Standards Rubric The Online Course Standards Rubric provides a framework for online course design based on the University of New Mexico s online course standards and expectancies for quality
Community College System of New Hampshire What is edesign? edesign is a rubric that defines course quality design standards for 100% online courses offered by CCSNH. To supplement the rubric and support
SVCC Exemplary Online Course Checklist Purpose of the SVCC Exemplary Course Checklist The SVCC Exemplary Course Checklist has been created to: guide faculty as they prepare a course for online instruction
Designing and Developing a Quality Online Course Faculty Reference Guide Garrett College Office of Distance Learning 2010 Teaching Online: The Tutorial to Designing and Developing a Quality Course Office
MOE Online Class Quality Guidelines The following guidelines were developed by the MiraCosta Online Educators committee to inform online faculty of required elements for Distance Education classes, offer
ECU Quality Assurance Guidelines for Online Delivery PURPOSE The purpose of these guidelines is to encompass and improve ECU s existing minimum standards for online units, and to extend ECU s quality assurance
Standards For Online Courses The following Standards for Online Courses have been carefully developed to ensure the highest quality and consistency of online course offerings (full online, partial online,
Online and Hybrid Course Development Guidelines February 10, 2011 The following is intended to serve as a guide to the development of online and hybrid courses at Cedar Crest College. Substantively, the
Assuring that the Online Course is Ready for Prime Time Kats Gustafson, Ed.D. Dean, Online and Distributed Learning San Diego Community College District firstname.lastname@example.org One of the tried and true techniques
The Alamo Colleges Online (ACOL) is committed to quality teaching and learning. A critical component of maintaining quality online programs is the evaluation process. All faculty teaching online, hybrid,
ES4077 Page 1 DES MOINES AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL SERVICES PROCEDURES FACULTY Section: INSTRUCTIONAL ADMINISTRATION Procedure: Application for Award of and Completion of Online Courses Effective
ILLINIOS VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE Online and Blended Course Review Online and Blended Course Review The Online and Blended Course Review process has been developed with the goal of maintaining the outstanding
Northern Virginia Community College: Hybrid Course Template Section I: Blackboard Design This section includes a table that provides a template for setting up a hybrid course s Blackboard site. The guidelines
Blackboard Development Checklist for Online Courses Met Course Development Rubrics The following rubrics should be used as benchmarks to assist faculty with developing and maintaining their online courses.
Online Development Guidelines and Rubric Introduction and Task Force Recommendations Purpose The guidelines identify the issues that faculty at Michigan community colleges should address when developing
The UW-L Online Course Evaluation Guidelines are intended to help instructors create and teach well-designed online courses. The Guidelines outline specific features of online courses and recommend ways
Requirement III: Academic and Learning Outcomes 3.2 Online Course Readiness (Online Programs Only) Online programs conform to established standards for online learning. Face-to-face programs do not complete
Virtual Coastal Bend College (vcbc) Course Approval Form This document will be used by vcbc Faculty when submitting courses for online delivery. Compliance with this document demonstrates adherence to:
OCEP Overview The Online Course Evaluation Project (OCEP) identifies and evaluates existing online courses in higher education, Advanced Placement, and high school. The goal of OCEP is to provide the academic
If using Firefox, you must download the form. Click the download icon in the top right corner (looks like a down arrow on a sheet of paper). You will then be asked in the pop window if you want to open
Quality Matters Online Course Development and Guidelines Instructor: First Semester Course will be offered: Course: Credit/Non- Credit: College/School/Department: Degree/Program/Certificate: Development
Teaching Online: The Tutorial May 2011 Office of Distance Learning Tel. 301-846-2401 email@example.com What do you need to complete this Tutorial? 1. You need to have completed your Basic and Advanced
ONLINE COURSE EVALUATION TOOL FACULTY CENTER FOR IGNATIAN PEDAGOGY LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO This checklist is intended for use as a formative measure of online course development and/or a summative reflection
Blackboard Exemplary Course Program Rubric The Blackboard Exemplary Course Program(ECP) recognizes course creators whose courses demonstrate best practices in four major areas: Course Design, Interaction
Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana POLICY TITLE Distance Education Course Design and Development POLICY NUMBER ASOM 6.0 (Formerly APPM 5. & 5.) PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY Instructional Design CREATION /
1 Quality Guidelines for Course Development The following guidelines are based on the Rubric for Online Instruction (ROI) created by Chico State University and on an adaptation of the instructional design
!"#$&'()$*)"#+,'-"."/,&*01 (0--"/*."'*01,0/*0"*0#$'2)$*,0 ($$3"40*."'#*$5,+6"00"##""780,9.*//" Welcome statement University teaching and learning is no longer confined to the physical classroom. Faculty
EDU 295 633 Fall 2010 Course Syllabus Instructional Design for Online Learning Instructor: Kristin Machac The Faculty Bio button in Blackboard also contains your instructor s contact information, office
Guide to Best Practices in Online Teaching Online Teaching and Learning Committee Cuyamaca College Revised November 2012 Committee: Rhonda Bauerlein, Joe D Amato, Connie Elder, Brian Josephson, Kathy Kotowski,
A resource for quality online curriculum creation The ecampusalberta elearning Rubric is designed to support the creation of quality online curriculum. The standards outlined in this document are employed
Memorandum of Understanding For Development of Regent s Online Degree Courses East Tennessee State University Department: RODP Internet-Based :Course Name and Number: Faculty Member: I. This memorandum
Course Design Rubric for the Online Education Initiative In order for a course to be offered as a part of the Online Education Initiative (OEI) course exchange, it must meet established standards relating
elearning Instructional Design Guidelines Ministry of Labour Queen s Printer for Ontario ISBN 978-1-4606-4885-8 (PDF) ISBN 978-1-4606-4884-1 (HTML) December 2014 1 Disclaimer This elearning Instructional
A Content inacol Standards of Quality for Online Courses The course goals and objectives are measurable and clearly state what the participants will know or be able to do at the end of the course. Course
Quality Standards for Online Learning Guidelines regarding minimum standards are used for course development, design, and delivery of quality online instruction (such as course syllabus elements, course
ACADEMIC POLICIES THAT CAN AFFECT YOU AS A UMUC FACULTY MEMBER Familiarizes faculty with UMUC Academic Policies and their effect on faculty responsibilities and expectations for students Intended for all
Online Learning at Duke: A Planning Guide I. Planning an online program at Duke (for deans, chairs, program directors) II. Teaching an online class at Duke (Faculty, TAs, etc. level) III. Adding online
Instructional Computing in Secondary Schools Day/Time: Daily, 4:10 9:00 PM (times flexible, see schedule below) Classroom: BH 218 Instructors: Dr. Brian Beatty Office: Department of Instructional Technologies
Course: Instructor: Instructor Review: Delgado Community College Standards for Online Courses The points are to help you understand how your course will be evaluated. Orientation to Course and LMS Clearly
INST 5500 Online Course Development Course Syllabus Fall 2015 (Aug 17 Dec 12) 3 GR Semester Hours COURSE DESCRIPTION Designed to synthesize information from educational technology coursework and experiences.
Equal Access: Universal Design of Instruction A checklist for inclusive teaching by Sheryl Burgstahler, Ph.D. Universal Design of Instruction The universal design of instruction (UDI) is gaining increased
Best Practices for Online Courses 100 Quality Indicators for Online Course Design The following criteria are meant to act as guidelines for the course development process. Some of these guidelines would
Online Course Proposal Form Form The purpose of this form is to guide the approval and development of online courses at the University of the District of Columbia (UDC). This form should be used when proposing
File Name Format (example): Course Review Course ID Instructor name your initials Faculty Name: Course: Semester: Reviewer: Date: This evaluation is a framework for addressing how a quality course should
MJC Online Course Review Process DRAFT Online courses have on average 10% lower student success across all disciplines. To enhance the teaching and learning experience and help promote student success,
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE for MEDICAL TERMINOLOGY ONLINE for MASTERING HEALTHCARE TERMINOLOGY, Third Edition Module 7: Male Reproductive System OVERVIEW Module 7 in Medical Terminology Online accompanies Chapter
Main Author: Amy Roche, Instructional Designer Contributing Authors: Tricia Clark, Instructional Technologist Mary Ann Mengel, Multimedia Specialist John Shank, Director for the Center for Learning & Teaching
NHS Shared Learning Quality Assurance Checklists for Evaluating Learning Objects and Online Courses February 2009 Page 1 Note This document provides an outline of the Resource workflow within NHS Shared
Best Practices and Review Standards for Online Instruction The following researched-based best practices are recommended to demonstrate quality in online course design. In November 2010 the Distance Education
Online Student Orientation A Virtual Walk to Class Online Student Orientation Script Slide Slide Title Script 1 Online Student Orientation Welcome to Aurora University! This virtual walk to class is designed
Course Development Resource Guide Professional Development & Community Engagement Educational Technology Support Introduction The Course Development Resource Guide provides information to course writers
Division of Fine Arts Department of Photography Course Syllabus COURSE TITLE COURSE NUMBER PREREQUISITES Digital Camera Work CRN 10097 PGY 1800C None CREDIT HOURS 3.0 CONTACT HOURS 45 hours online CLASS
Materials linked from the May 8, 2014 Curriculum Council agenda. MOU for New Online Program Development: Master of Engineering in Industrial Engineering, Engineering Management Option OSU Extended Campus
NCTE ICT in the Classroom Presentation software - focus on literacy & numeracy (Primary) Ref: 12-11 Introduction The purpose of this document is to provide an overview of the benefits of using presentation
Teaching Guidelines for Hybrid (Blended or Mix-Modal) course and fully online course at Trinity Western University (Suggested) Category 1- getting ready for teaching online: Welcome message in the course
Hello, thank you for joining me today as I discuss universal instructional design for online learning to increase inclusion of I/DD students in Associate and Bachelor degree programs. I work for the University
Introduction: Blended learning is defined as to combine Face-to-Face instruction with computer-mediated instruction Graham 2006. Mixing technology and content does not necessarily yield effective learning.
Best Practices in Online Teaching In 2006 Curtis Bonk in his article entitled The Future of Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: The Survey Says made reference to something called a perfect