Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU)

Similar documents
Is Practical Reservoir Simulation an Oxymoron?

SPE Life beyond 80 A Look at Conventional WAG Recovery beyond 80% HCPV Injection in CO2 Tertiary Floods David Merchant, Merchant Consulting

Waterflooding. A Tried and True Technique for Secondary Oil Recovery. Houston Bar Association Oil, Gas and Mineral Law Section March 26, 2013

Interview with Vello Kuuskraa

Objectives. Describing Waterflooding. Infill Drilling. Reservoir Life Cycle

Available online at Petroleum & Coal 55 (4) , 2013

60%+ 33% Future Oil Recovery Efficiency. Recovery Efficiency. Today s Oil. May Advanced Resources International

OFFSHORE FIELD DEVELOPMENT

Geomechanical Effects of Waterflooding

Recommended Practices Associated with Hydraulic Fracturing Operations

RESERVOIR EVALUATION. The volume of hydrocarbons in a reservoir can be calculated:

Introduction. The following is an outline of the contents of this paper: Definition of Artificial Lift Page 2. How an Oil Well is Produced Page 2

Reservoir Characterization and Initialization at Little Mitchell Creek

4D reservoir simulation workflow for optimizing inflow control device design a case study from a carbonate reservoir in Saudi Arabia

THE USE OF WATER FLOODING TO IMPROVE OIL RECOVERY BY USING RESERVOIR SIMULATION

ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY BY HORIZONTAL WATERFLOODING

BS PROGRAM IN PETROLEUM ENGINEERING (VERSION 2010) Course Descriptions

SPE Copyright 2004, Society of Petroleum Engineers Inc.

Search and Discovery Article #40256 (2007) Posted September 5, Abstract

Petrel TIPS&TRICKS from SCM

Hydrocarbon Production from the South Ellwood Field and the Effects on Naturally Occurring Oil and Gas Seeps*

Re-Fracturing and Water Flooding Western Canada Tight Oil Reservoir Horizontal Wells

Remediation Services & Technology

Upstream Developments Generate Growing Hydrocarbon Gas Liquids Supply! Alan Farquharson, SVP - Reservoir Engineering & Economics!

Status of existing and possible new production in Greece. S. Xenopoulos, N. Roussos, Hellenic Petroleum S.A., Athens, Greece

A Review of Gel Polymer Treatments in the Arbuckle Formation of Kansas

For personal use only

BP North Sea EOR lessons learned. Euan Duncan North Sea Discipline Lead Reservoir Engineer

Enhanced Oil Resources Inc. Provides 2012 Activity Update

6 Cavendish Square, London W1G 0PD, England,UK

Step Rate Testing: Determining Fracture Pressure for Injection Wells 2016 UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL CONFERENCE DENVER, CO LEWIS WANDKE, PE

Renewable Energy from Depleted Oil Fields using Geothermal Energy. Ramsey Kweik Southern Methodist University Geothermal Lab

New Yo r k Marc e l l us and Utica Shales. 130,000 net acres Oil, natural gas liquids, and dry gas Access to major pipelines

Storing of CO 2 offshore Norway, Criteria for evaluation of safe storage sites

DEPARTMENT OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERING Graduate Program (Version 2002)

Comparison Between Gas Injection and Water Flooding, in Aspect of Secondary Recovery in One of Iranian Oil Reservoirs

Selection and Determination of Tubing and Production Casing Sizes

The ever increasing importance of reservoir geomechanics

STAFF ANALYSIS OF THE WHITE ROSE PRODUCTION VOLUME INCREASE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION

EPAC: Oil and Gas Investor Showcase. June 10, 2015

2015 Annual General Meeting. 25 November 2015

Overview of the Hugoton Asset Management Project (HAMP) southwest Kansas and Oklahoma Panhandle

Waterflooding Surveillance and Monitoring: Putting Principles Into Practice

Low Salinity Waterflooding Fundamentals and Case Studies

Improving Domestic Energy Security and Lowering CO 2 Emissions with Next Generation CO 2 -Enhanced Oil Recovery (CO 2 -EOR) June 20, 2011

NOVEMBER 2015 UPDATE

SPE Paper Introduction

TECHNICAL OIL RECOVERY POTENTIAL

Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) in Tight Oil: Lessons Learned from Pilot Tests in the Bakken

COAL-SEQ PROJECT UPDATE: FIELD STUDIES OF ECBM RECOVERY/CO 2 SEQUESTRATION IN COALSEAMS

Annual General Meeting

EVALUATION OF GEOTHERMAL ENERGY AS HEAT SOURCE OF DISTRICT HEATING SYSTEMS IN TIANJIN, CHINA

Santuario Block, Mature Fields South Region. Executive Summary. Block. Santuario

The Growth of U.S. Natural Gas: An Uncertain Outlook for U.S. and World Supply

Upstream Project Value, Farm-in, Farm-out, Data Room

CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery

Western Pipelines. Greg Ruben, Director, EPNG Marketing Greg Gettman, Manager, Business Development November 1-2, 2011

HESS CORPORATION. Lean Leads the Way in a Low-Cost Environment

Classic Waterflooding Predicitive Models

A clear business model and strategy

Natural Gas Storage in Alaska

PETROMINERALES ACHIEVES RECORD THIRD QUARTER AND PRELIMINARY CORCEL-2 TEST RESULTS

Unconventional Challenges: Integrated Analysis for Unconventional Resource Development Robert Gales VP Resource Development

PETRONEFT RESOURCES PLC. Annual General Meeting, 29 August 2014

Analysis and Calculation Method for Automatic Water Flooding Technology

Oil and gas fields in norway Industrial Heritage plan

A History and Overview of the Barnett Shale

PRESIDENT ENERGY PLC. ( President or the Company ) OIL DISCOVERY IN PARAGUAYAN CHACO

CORPORATE PRESENTATION June A Lundin Group Company

For personal use only

Eagle Ford Shale Exploration Regional Geology meets Geophysical Technology. Galen Treadgold Bruce Campbell Bill McLain

Norwest Energy NL. Northern Perth Basin Farm-In Opportunities. PESA Deal Day Brisbane Shelley Robertson Asset Manager.

I N T E R I M R E P O R T

RESERVOIR GEOSCIENCE AND ENGINEERING

Data Integration Between State and Federal Agencies in the U.S. Lee Allison Association of American State Geologists

ASX ANNOUNCEMENT LINC ENERGY ACQUIRES OIL PRODUCING ASSETS IN WYOMING, USA

Journal of Petroleum Research & Studies. Analytical and Numerical Analysis for Estimation. Hydrocarbon in Place for Fauqi Oil Field

EVALUATION OF WELL TESTS USING RADIAL COMPOSITE MODEL AND DIETZ SHAPE FACTOR FOR IRREGULAR DRAINAGE AREA. Hana Baarová 1

2016 Budget Targets 39% Production Growth, $0.75/mcf Total Cash Costs and 1.6x Debt to Cash AECO Cdn $2.50/mcf

FlairFlex. Real-time fluid logging and analysis service

Geologic Criteria for Eastern Kentucky Permanent CO 2 Storage (Saline reservoir test)

Florinel ªuþoiu*, Argentina Tãtaru*, Bogdan Simescu* RIGLESS JOBS IN GAS WELLS

David Greeson and Kenji Hagiwara

ADX ENERGY. Sidi Dhaher Well test Briefing Live Webcast, 4 July Wolfgang Zimmer, Paul Fink

Andrew K. Wojtanowicz* DOWN-HOLE WATER SINK TECHNOLOGY FOR WATER CONING CONTROL IN WELLS

Reserve Definitions Total Petroleum-initially-in-place Discovered Petroleum-initially-in- place

FAN group includes NAMVARAN UPSTREAM,

PROPOSED KOLA UNIT NO. 3. Application for Enhanced Oil Recovery Waterflood Project. Bakken Formation. Bakken-Three Forks A Pool (62A) Daly, Manitoba

Geothermal Technologies Program

CCS Risk Analysis. Vanessa Nuñez Lopez. CEPAC - CSLF Capacity Building Workshop Porto Alegre, Brazil July 30 Aug 3, 2012

To enable transport of wellstream over long distances. Compressor located by the wellheads.

Reservoir Simulation

Optimization of Reinjection Allocation in Geothermal Fields Using Capacitance-Resistance Models

Dover SAGD Progress Review Thermal Heavy Oil

Low Risk Glacier Montney Development, Strong Balance Sheet & Hedging Program Supports Profitable & Sustainable Growth

Baron Energy, Inc. Corporate Overview. October 1,

October Guatemalan Oil Production and Exploration

Well Data Submission Requirements Manual

Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania: A 2,600 Well Study of Estimated Ultimate Recovery (EUR) 2015 Update

GAS WELL/WATER WELL SUBSURFACE CONTAMINATION

Transcription:

Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) Rory Clark Reservoir Engineer Chevron North America E&P 6 th Annual Wyoming CO2 Conference Casper, WY July 12, 2012

Outline Location Geology Field Development History CO2 Project Development Recent Efforts Lessons Learned / Summary 2

Rangely Field Location Wyoming Utah Colorado Rangely Field 3

Rangely Statistics (as of October 2011) Oil Production NGL Production Water Production Gas Production CO 2 Purchases October 2011 monthly numbers 11,660 B/D 1,247 B/D 229,420 B/D 157 MMCF/D* 31 MMCF/D *All produced gas is re-injected. Cumulative as of October 2011 Oil Production 887 MMB NGL Production 11.8 MMB Water Production 4.5 BB CO 2 Purchase 540 BCF Gas Production (since CO 2 ) 1.1TCF CO 2 Injection 1.6 TCF 4

Well Data (October, 2011) Average Elevation 5300 FT Average Perf Depth 6000 FT Active Producers 372 189 Electric Submersible Pumps 69 Flowing Wells 90 Rod Pumps Active Injectors 267 Total Wells* 947 *including P&A and SI 5

RWSU - Geology

Reservoir Properties Producing Horizon Weber Lithology Aeolian SS w/fluvial stringers Unit Area 19,153 Acres Average Gross Thickness 526 FT Average Effective Thickness 189 FT Average Effective Porosity 12% Average Effective Perm. 8 md Average Initial Swi 35.8% Reservoir Temperature 160 deg. F Initial Reservoir Pressure 2750 psi Fractures Some faulting & natural fractures 7

Rangely Field Top Weber Structural Contour Map Top Weber Ss structure map of the Rangely Field (Mendeck,1986) A -330ft MSL -1150ft MSL CI = 50 A

Rangely Type Log 9

Rangely Weber Sand Unit ZONE 1 10

RWSU- Field Development History

BPD OR MCFPD Rangely Weber Sand Unit Development History 1933 Weber Sand Discovery 1944 40 Acre Development 1950-69 HC Gas Injection 1957 Unitization 1958-83 Waterflood Expansions 1963-85 20 Acre Infill, WF Align 1983-present 10 Acre Pilots 1986- CO2 Flood (tertiary) 2000-2011 Renewed Expansions and Targeted Infill Drilling 1,000,000 100,000 10,000 1,000 1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 BOPD BWPD MCFPD BWIPD CO2IPD MCFIPD 12

BOPD RWSU Oil Production History 100,000 Infill Drilling End of original areal expansions. Peripheral Waterflood Start CO2 injection. Effect of additional expansions and infill drilling near unit boundaries. Production trend lines Transition to interior patterns. Start of recent" expansions. 10,000 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 13

RWSU CO2 Project Development

Rangely Weber Sand Unit Shute Creek Raven Ridge Pipeline UTAH Rock Springs WYOMING COLORADO N Rangely

Initial CO2 Project Design 1:1 WAG Ratio. Alternating volumes 1.5% HCPV CO2 and Water. Inject 30% HCPV CO2 slug. Follow CO2 with one HCPV water. 106 MMSTB Incremental oil production. 6.7% Incremental oil recovery.

CO2 Project Milestones CO 2 project /construction begins. 1985 Raven Ridge Pipeline completed. 1985 CO 2 injection starts. Oct 1986 Recycle compression and NGL construction. 1987-91 Expansions within original construction area. 1989 Expansion to far east. 1992 Focus on WAG Management, CO2 highgrading and conformance improvement with some small expansions. 1993-2000 Expansions to the NW and north. 2000-2011

Project Expansion Over Time Expanded out radially from the original CO2 injection (pink) area. 18

1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 BOPD RWSU CO2 Flood Performance 60,000 RWSU CO2 Flood Performance 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 - Total Oil Incremental Oil Waterflood Oil 19

Major Facilities and Upgrades Recycle compression. NGL Recovery. Additional water injection plant. Collection station re-builds. New gas distribution system. New gas gathering system. Large-scale replacement of production flowlines. Low-pressure gas gathering system. 20

RWSU Focus Efforts

Focus areas CO2 Expansions Expansions have occurred primarily to the west and north areas of the unit. There has been significant success. Infill Drilling 20-acre infills to the north and west. 10-acre infill pilot. Base Production 22

RWSU CO2 Expansions Expansions have occurred primarily to the west and north areas of the unit. These projects contributed approximately 2500 bopd in 2011. Cumulative recovery from projects is approximately 3.35MMBO through 2011. There has been significant success. 23

Infill Drilling 2 focus areas: 20-acre infills to the north and west. 10-acre infill pilot. 24

BOPD RWSU Project Contribution 30000 25000 20000 CO 2 expansions and Infills have significantly added to daily production and ultimate recovery. 15000 Total Actual Prod 10000 8.5% Exponential Decline 5000 25

Other Projects and Opportunities Sweep Improvement Re-alignment 3 successful pilots. Larger study area being implemented now in the middle of the field. Vertical Conformance Large opportunity but most challenging to implement due to poor wellbore condition. Considering a possible foam CO2 trial. 10-acre Infill Pilot 2 new pilot wells drilled in 2010 are under observation.

Project Evolution Summary Initial Design Actual WAG Ratio 1:1 Tapered Half Cycle Slug Size 1.5% HCPV Varies Ultimate HCPV Slug Size 30% 46% Compression Capacity 120 MMCFD 165 MMCFD Peak CO 2 Purchase Rate 200 MMCFD 150 MMCFD Ultimate CO 2 Purchase 670 BCF 540 BCF + NGL Recovery NO YES

Tertiary Recovery Project Statistics (October 2011) Tertiary Incremental Oil Rate (Oil + NGL) 9,170 STB/D Incremental Cumulative Oil (Oil + NGL) 87 MMSTB (4.8%) Cum Solvent Purchased Cum Solvent Recycled 540 BSCF 990 BSCF Cum Solvent Injected 1,604 BSCF or 46% HCPVSI Cum Gas Produced to Injected Ratio 69 % Cum CO2 Utilization - Gross Cum CO2 Utilization - Net Average Field WAG Ratio 2.5 14.6 MSCF/STB 4.9 MSCF/STB

Summary 1) The Rangely Weber Sand Unit CO2 flood has been an economically successful project. 2) Flood implementation has changed dramatically over time in response to economic factors and operational decisions. 3) Technical innovation and flexibility has been critical to field development over time. 4) Recent projects in previously under-developed area of field are adding significant production and field life. 5) Long history of producing our resources with positive impact to the community and minimal impact to the environment.

Lessons Learned CO2 flooding is a complicated process and you will be surprised at times. Be ready to make changes. Work closely with operations personnel to identify trends quickly. WAG tapering and reduced half-cycles have proven to be an effective way to control gas production. Reduced half cycles can help from both an operational and sweep standpoint. Facility capacity design is challenging. Plan expansion capability into the design. 30

Thank You 31