SOIL MECHANICS Assignment #8: Shear Strength Solution.

Similar documents
Drained and Undrained Conditions. Undrained and Drained Shear Strength

Soil Mechanics. Outline. Shear Strength of Soils. Shear Failure Soil Strength. Laboratory Shear Strength Test. Stress Path Pore Pressure Parameters

Soil Strength. Performance Evaluation of Constructed Facilities Fall Prof. Mesut Pervizpour Office: KH #203 Ph: x4046

ENCE 4610 Foundation Analysis and Design

CHAPTER 9 FEM MODELING OF SOIL-SHEET PILE WALL INTERACTION

ANNEX D1 BASIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR REVIEWING STUDIES IN THE DETAILED RISK ASSESSMENT FOR SAFETY

COMPENDIUM OF INDIAN STANDARDS ON SOIL ENGINEERING PART 2

Figure CPT Equipment

Earth Pressure and Retaining Wall Basics for Non-Geotechnical Engineers

c. Borehole Shear Test (BST): BST is performed according to the instructions published by Handy Geotechnical Instruments, Inc.

FOUNDATION DESIGN. Instructional Materials Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples

PART TWO GEOSYNTHETIC SOIL REINFORCEMENT. Martin Street Improvements, Fredonia, Wisconsin; Keystone Compac Hewnstone

Soil Mechanics SOIL STRENGTH page 1

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FORMULAS. A handy reference for use in geotechnical analysis and design

EARTHWORKS COMPLETION REPORT ELLEN STIRLING PARADE, ELLENBROOK. Ellenbrook, W.A. Georgiou Group Pty Ltd

Specification Guidelines: Allan Block Modular Retaining Wall Systems

Numerical Simulation of CPT Tip Resistance in Layered Soil

Soil Mechanics. Soil Mechanics

Settlement of Precast Culverts Under High Fills; The Influence of Construction Sequence and Structural Effects of Longitudinal Strains

Basic Soil Erosion and Types

Liner system design for tailings impoundments and heap leach pads

vulcanhammer.net This document downloaded from

Effect of grain size, gradation and relative density on shear strength and dynamic cone penetration index of Mahi, Sabarmati and Vatrak Sand

COSMOS 2012: Earthquakes in Action COSMOS 2012

STRUCTURES Excavation and backfill for structures should conform to the topic EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL.

K x ' Retaining. Walls ENCE 461. Foundation Analysis and Design. Mohr s Circle. and Lateral Earth. Pressures. Lateral Earth Pressure.

Retaining Wall Global Stability & AASHTO LRFD Unnecessary, Unreasonable Guideline Changes Result in Huge Wastes of Money at Some Wall Locations

CEEN Geotechnical Engineering Laboratory Session 7 - Direct Shear and Unconfined Compression Tests

Chapter 4 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION GUIDELINES

Module 1 : Site Exploration and Geotechnical Investigation. Lecture 4 : In-situ tests [ Section 4.1: Penetrometer Tests ] Objectives

CIVL451. Soil Exploration and Characterization

EXAMPLE 1 DESIGN OF CANTILEVERED WALL, GRANULAR SOIL

Caltrans Geotechnical Manual

System. Stability. Security. Integrity. 150 Helical Anchor

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CEMENT-BENTONITE SLURRY TRENCH CUTOFF WALL

Foundation Code compliance and Best Practices By Michael Coello

Period #16: Soil Compressibility and Consolidation (II)

Geotechnical Investigation using Standard Penetration Test (SPT) in Rangamati, Bandarban and Khagrachari Towns

Appendix B. Kensington Project Tailings Storage Facility Consolidation Testing & Modeling

HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT GUIDANCE NOTES ON SOIL TEST FOR PAVEMENT DESIGN

Geotechnical Measurements and Explorations Prof. Nihar Ranjan Patra Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur

Work Type Definition and Submittal Requirements

Program COLANY Stone Columns Settlement Analysis. User Manual

SOIL MECHANICS Assignment #4: Soil Permeability.

INDIRECT METHODS SOUNDING OR PENETRATION TESTS. Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode

SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ROCK MECHANICS CHAMBER OF MINES OF SOUTH AFRICA CERTIFICATE IN ROCK MECHANICS PART 1 ROCK MECHANICS THEORY

Table of Contents 10.1 GENERAL

Strength Determination of "Tooth-Paste" Like Sand and Gravel Washing Fines Using DMT

DIRECT SHEAR TEST SOIL MECHANICS SOIL MECHANICS LABORATORY DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF MORATUWA SRI LANKA

SERVICES 2015 ISO 18001

Eurocode 7 - Geotechnical design - Part 2 Ground investigation and testing

SECTION PAVEMENT DESIGN

REAL-TIME SLOPE AND WALL MONITORING AND REPORTING USING 3-D MEMS-BASED, IN-PLACE INCLINOMETER SYSTEM

Geotechnical Investigation Reports and Foundation Recommendations - Scope for Improvement - Examples

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION CITY OF HOUSTON SURFACE WATER TRANSMISSION PROGRAM CONTRACT 74A-1 WATERLINE COH WBS NO. S HOUSTON, TEXAS

10.1 Powder mechanics

Best Management Practices for Coal Ash Storage Facilities

AN AEM TOOL FOR THE EVALUATION OF UNDESIGNED WASTE STORAGE FACILITIES

STANDARD INSPECTION & TEST PLAN (ITP) FOR CIVIL WORKS :

Flow Properties of Powders and Bulk Solids

How To Design A Foundation

Module 1 : Site Exploration and Geotechnical Investigation. Lecture 5 : Geophysical Exploration [ Section 5.1 : Methods of Geophysical Exploration ]

THE EFFECT OF IMPROVEMENT SURROUNDING SOIL ON BORED PILE FRICTION CAPACITY

ME531/ME413/CE413: Foundation Analysis and Design Spring 2015

A study on the Effect of Distorted Sampler Shoe on Standard Penetration Test Result in Cohesionless soil

By D. P. StewarP and M. F. Randolph z

KWANG SING ENGINEERING PTE LTD

PILE FOUNDATIONS FM 5-134

Geotechnical Engineering: Slope Stability

SIENA STONE GRAVITY RETAINING WALL INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS. Prepared by Risi Stone Systems Used by permission.

SOIL COMPACTION BASICS

Westeros Design Project

Highway 23 Paynesville Richmond Soils Borings, Soils Tests, and Reporting

MSE Wall Engineering A New Look at Contracting, Design, and Construction. Presented by: James M. Schmidt, P.E., P.Eng. 1 Daniel L. Harpstead, P.E.

1. ASTM C Sampling and Testing Concrete Masonry Units 2. ASTM C 1372 Standard Specification for Dry-Cast Segmental Retaining Wall Units

INTRODUCTION TO SOIL MODULI. Jean-Louis BRIAUD 1

SPECIFICATION FOR DYNAMIC CONSOLIDATION / DYNAMIC REPLACEMENT

ASSESSMENT OF SHEAR WAVE VELOCITY FROM INDIRECT INSITU TESTS

EARTH PRESSURE AND HYDRAULIC PRESSURE

SPECIFICATIONS FOR PRECAST MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SYSTEM (revised 11/5/13)

Module 7 (Lecture 24 to 28) RETAINING WALLS

Gasketed PVC Sewer Pipe Durable, Flexible, Reliable Waterworks Products

Tests and Analyses on Shear Strength Increment of Soft Soil under Embankment Fill

Numerical Analysis of Texas Cone Penetration Test

Geotechnical Investigation Test Report

1 Mobilisation and demobilisation 1 Deep boring sum 2 Cone penetration tests sum 3 Miscellenous tests sum

State of Illinois Department Of Transportation CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR S CHECKLIST FOR STORM SEWERS

EVALUATION OF TEXAS CONE PENETROMETER TEST TO PREDICT UNDRAINED SHEAR STRENGTH OF CLAYS HARIHARAN VASUDEVAN

APPLICATION FOR DEMOLITION & RIGHT-OF OF-WAY PERMIT

Work Type Definition and Submittal Requirements

Creep Characteristics and Shear Strength. of Recycled Asphalt Blends. Jeffery M. Schaper

Soil Classification Through Penetration Tests

SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT RESOURCE REGULATION TRAINING MEMORANDUM

Washington ,

SOIL-LIME TESTING. Test Procedure for. TxDOT Designation: Tex-121-E 1. SCOPE 2. APPARATUS 3. MATERIALS TXDOT DESIGNATION: TEX-121-E

LABORATORY CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES

Pore pressure. Ordinary space

EM Oct US Army Corps of Engineers ENGINEERING AND DESIGN. Slope Stability ENGINEER MANUAL

C. Section TESTING LABORATORY SERVICE.

Transcription:

14.330 SOIL MECHANICS Assignment #8: Shear Strength Solution. PROBLEM #1: GIVEN: A regional residential building contractor is planning on building a custom 3,700 ft² home on Cape Cod. The subsurface investigation for the house site shows that a poorly graded sand deposit exists from the existing ground surface to a depth of 15 ft. Density testing on the sand insitu showed yielded an average moist unit weight of 112 pcf at an average moisture content of 12%. REQUIRED: Determine the shear strength parameters for use in a preliminary shallow foundation design. SOLUTION: 112 pcf d pcf 1 w 1 0.12 100. SP. Use Figure 7 (NAVFAC DM 7.01, 1986). 34 26 Figure 7. NAVFAC DM 7.01, 1986. 14.330 2013 Assignment 8 Solution Page 1 of 6

Using Figure 7 of NAVFAC DM7.01: 26 ' 33. PROBLEM #2: GIVEN: Soil from a local contractor s soil pit is proposed for use as backfill behind a Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) Wall for a local project. The project specifications require that the backfill material have a minimum residual soil friction angle of 32 at the required compaction (i.e. 95% Modified Proctor). The results from the direct shear testing performed at the minimum required compaction by a local testing firm are provided in a CSV file (14.330_2013_Assignment_8_P2.csv). REQUIRED: Determine the peak and residual friction angles ( peak and residual ) for this soil. Determine if the soil meets the project specifications. Explain density (loose or dense) of the soil based on direct shear results. SOLUTION: Using data provided in Figure A (plotted from the provided data), determine the peak and residual shear strengths for the tests at the three (3) confining (i.e. normal) stresses. This summary is provided in Table A. Table A. Direct Shear Results (from Figure A). Test Confining Stress ( ) Shear Stress ( ) Peak Residual 1 14.4 5.5 4.4 2 17.5 14.0 11.8 3 23.1 18.4 17.0 Plot of shear stress vs. normal stress to determine peak and residual is presented in Figure B. Note that the data points at = 14.4 would cause the best fit line to have a negative cohesion (which is impossible). Therefore, do not use them to calculate the Mohr-Coulomb Failure Criteria. Assume no cohesion (i.e. c=0) since no soil classification is provided. A summary of the Mohr-Coulomb Failure Criteria from the direct shear testing is presented in Table B. 14.330 2013 Assignment 8 Solution Page 2 of 6

Figure A. Direct Shear Results for Problem #2. 14.330 2013 Assignment 8 Solution Page 3 of 6

Figure B. Shear Stress vs. Confining Stress for Direct Shear Results for Problem 2. Table B. Direct Shear Results Summary for Problem #2. State Friction Angle ( ) ( ) Cohesion (c) Peak 38.5 0 Residual 35.5 0 Since residual = 35.5 > 32 (Required residual by specification), this soil CAN be used for the project. This soil was tested in a dense state. That can be determined by volumetric behavior of the soil during the direct shear test and from the fact that peak > residual. 14.330 2013 Assignment 8 Solution Page 4 of 6

PROBLEM #3: GIVEN: During the subsurface exploration at a new roadway embankment, soil samples were collected from a CL soil layer. The results of the CD triaxial testing for this soil are presented in Table 1. Table 1. CD Triaxial Testing Results for CL soil layer samples. Test Minor Principal Stress at Failure ( ' 3f ) Major Principal Stress at Failure ( ' 1f ) 1 5 23 2 10 38.5 3 15 53.6 REQUIRED: Determine the effective and total Mohr-Coulomb Failure Criteria for this soil. SOLUTION: The effective Mohr circles are presented in Figure C. Using Figure C, the Mohr- Coulomb Failure Criteria were determined for the effective stresses case. Friction angles and cohesion for the effective stress envelope are summarized in Table C. Table C. CU Triaxial Test Results Summary for CL soil. State Friction Angle ( ) Cohesion Effective ( and c ) 30 2.5 Note that since no determination of the soils over consolidation was provided, fit the best fit line in Figure C to the tangent of all the Mohr circles. 14.330 2013 Assignment 8 Solution Page 5 of 6

Figure C. CD Test Results for Problem 3 (Effective Stresses). 14.330 2013 Assignment 8 Solution Page 6 of 6