Contents: Broadly defined. Why Outcome mapping? What is unique? Different from other approaches

Similar documents
Promoting hygiene. 9.1 Assessing hygiene practices CHAPTER 9

FAO Competency Framework

Outcome Mapping Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation

Leadership and Management Competencies

Attribute 1: COMMUNICATION

Introduction CHAPTER 1

International Advocacy Capacity Tool for organizational assessment

Addressing the social impact of mining activities on communities for sustainability

Monitoring the Impact of Small Reservoirs Tools Application with Outcome Mapping

Guidance for the development of gender responsive Joint Programmes. MDG Achievement Fund

HEAD OF SALES AND MARKETING

4.1 Identify what is working well and what needs adjustment Outline broad strategies that will help to effect these adjustments.

Chapter 5: Invest in Capacity Building

MCH LEADERSHIP SKILLS SELF-ASSESSMENT

Monitoring and Evaluation of. Interventions

Job Grade: Band 5. Job Reference Number:

Leading Self. Leading Others. Leading Performance and Change. Leading the Coast Guard

A social marketing approach to behaviour change

Conducting Formative Research

Young Enterprise Masterclass

Information-gathering instrument on United Nations standards and norms related primarily to the prevention of crime

DATA ANALYSIS AND USE

STANDARD. Risk Assessment. Supply Chain Risk Management: A Compilation of Best Practices

Teenage Pregnancy and Sexual Health Marketing Strategy November 2009

STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS. Objective: To develop an understanding of stakeholder analysis methods

An introduction to impact measurement

Behaviors and Actions That Support Leadership and Team Effectiveness, by Organizational Level

Objective Oriented Planning Module 1. Stakeholder Analysis

Odisha Power Generation Corporation Ltd.

National Standards for Disability Services. DSS Version 0.1. December 2013

Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe

TEACHING AND LEARNING STRATEGY

X: Licensed Practical Nurse Leadership Role

The Engineers Canada Leader

Middlesbrough Manager Competency Framework. Behaviours Business Skills Middlesbrough Manager

TOOL D14 Monitoring and evaluation: a framework

Project Management Office Charter

Most community foundations operate a

CITIES IN CRISIS CONSULTATIONS - Gaziantep, Turkey

Evaluation: Designs and Approaches

The Most Significant Change: using participatory video for monitoring and evaluation

Vision Statement for Innovative Software Development in a Large. Corporation

Job Profile. Postholder will be required to determine liability and quantum on claims made against the Authority.

TRAINING CATALOGUE ON IMPACT INSURANCE. Building practitioner skills in providing valuable and viable insurance products

The integrated leadership system. ILS support tools. Leadership pathway: Individual profile EL1

Members respond to help identify what makes RNs unique and valuable to healthcare in Alberta.

ASSESSMENT AND QUALITY ENHANCEMENT

CONCEPT NOTE. High-Level Thematic Debate

Coaching the team at Work

Making a positive difference for energy consumers. Competency Framework Band C

Draft conclusions proposed by the Chair. Recommendation of the Subsidiary Body for Implementation

Key Leadership Behaviors Necessary to Advance in Project Management

UCL Personal Tutoring Strategy

Saskatoon North Partnership for Growth (P4G) Draft Communications and Engagement Strategy

Flag A GUIDELINES FOR PREPARING A STRATEGIC PLAN DOCUMENT. 1. Purpose of the Guidelines. 2. Strategy and Results- Framework Document (RFD)

Zimbabwe Women s Economic Empowerment Study Terms of Reference

Managers Self- Assessment Questionnaire. HWDSB Managers Self-Assessment: September

9 million people get sick with TB.

TOOL. Project Progress Report

How To Be A Health Care Provider

GET STARTED WITH LINKEDIN. A Guide by ConsultingFact.com. An Insider s Guide

QUALITY IN EVERYDAY WORK. Quality Guide for the Teacher Education College Version 2.7

Strategic Plan to Building a safer future for Canadians

Organizational Culture Transformation: Leveraging Culture to Enhance Performance

Crosswalk: Core Competencies for Public Health Professionals & the Essential Public Health Services

TOR - Consultancy Announcement Final Evaluation of the Cash assistance and recovery support project (CARSP)

Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning Plan

Module 2: Introduction to M&E frameworks and Describing the program

i2isales Training Solution - Sales Management

360 FEEDBACK: DEVELOPING AN EFFECTIVE SYSTEM

Team Dynamics in Process Simplification. Introduction to Process Improvement Slide 1

Chapter 3 Data Interpretation and Reporting Evaluation

D R A F T NATIONAL PLAN FOR MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH TRAINING GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

The elearning Competency Framework for Teachers and Trainers

World Health Organization

Strategic HR Partner Assessment (SHRPA) Feedback Results

Head of Commercial & Contract Management (BISRID_046)

LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK

ADVERTISEMENT. Markets for Change / M4C Communications and Monitoring & Evaluation Officer (SC SB-4)

TOOL. Project Progress Report

Communications Strategy

EXECUTIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVIEW GUIDE

To work with the General Manager in developing and growing a Structural Engineering Team within the Alexander & Co Ltd (ACL) brand.

The fact is that 90% of business strategies are not implemented through operations as intended. Overview

Understand life - Preserve the environment. Strategy Document, Department of Biology

Social Survey Methods and Data Collection

key evaluation questions

The Leadership Qualities Framework. For Adult Social Care

COMMUNICATION STRATEGY of the Interreg IPA Cross-border Cooperation programme Croatia Serbia

Develop a strategic plan. A tool for NGOs and CBOs M

Inquilab Housing Association. Job Profile

Supporting best practice in community development. Reaping the Legacy of the Commonwealth Games

the Defence Leadership framework

VALUE CHAIN DEVELOPMENT Training activities & Tools

Guidance for ISO liaison organizations Engaging stakeholders and building consensus

Performance Evaluation Senior Leadership

Self Assessment Tool for Principals and Vice-Principals

Using Evaluation to Improve Programs. Strategic Planning.

IAP2 Certification Program in Public Participation. planning communication techniques

Job Description. Barnet Band & scale range. No. of staff responsible for 0 Budget responsibility ( ) Purpose of Job

Transcription:

Contents: Broadly defined Why Outcome mapping? What is unique? Different from other approaches

- Outcomes = changes in behaviour, relationships, activities, actions of people, groups, and organizations that program targets - OM focuses on immediate changes the project wishes to initiate or establish Changes to influence realization of desired impacts - OM thus = a way or an approach to project planning, monitoring and evaluation that maps, supports the development of and captures desired outcomes (changes) as they unfold

Some Features of OM Focuses on how programs facilitate change rather than how they control or cause change Looks at the links between interventions and outcomes rather than trying to attribute results to a particular intervention Requires the involvement of program staff and partners throughout the planning and monitoring Through OM, a program can claim contributions to the achievement of outcomes rather than claiming achievement of impacts

- No one delivers outcomes alone. In all R & D efforts many other players and events play key roles problem identification, exploring solutions Working partnerships Adaptation and wider scaling testing and adoption

- OM requires engagement with partners in relationships that support behavioural changes leading to outcomes indicating progress towards impact OM does not focus on ATTRIBUTION and IMPACT!!!

Outcome Mapping helps a program -be specific about actors to target - the changes expected, - strategies to be employed and, as a result, - be more effective in terms of results to be achieved. Valuable for programs whose results and achievements CANNOT be understood with quantitative indicators ALONE but which require qualitative, contextualized story of development process

Vision and Mission in OM Context Who are Boundary partners (BPs)?

Large-scale ultimate development changes (economic, political, social or environmental) to which the program hopes to contribute, described described in behavioural, action type and/or changed relationship terms Ideal social changes that inspire support and enthusiasm Ultimate achievement of the vision which lies beyond the program's capability

Answers to questions such as: - What is this program supposed to accomplish? - What two to three characteristics would describe the future if the program was wildly successful? - What are your dreams of success? - In three to five years when the program has been very successful, what would be different? The vision is a beacon, a guiding light.

Examples on community changes: - All the women in the community have access to markets and control over their household s incomes - Poor livestock owners have easy access to animal disease control methods able to cope with ECF. Examples on institutional changes: - Municipal, regional, and national governments actively support urban agriculture (UA) activities by formulating and implementing UA-related policies - The countries governments have developed a comprehensive urban food supply and security strategy that allows cities to fully exploit their local strengths and create effective mechanisms for collaboration with rural and regional agriculture production sectors.

How the Program intends to support achievement of the Vision. The areas in which it will work; Who the Program will work with. Its general positioning, approach, expertise, and resource allocation philosophy Answers to questions such as: - How can the project best contribute to or support the achievement of the vision? - What does the project need to be like in order to support the vision?

Examples: - Supporting local rural communities and households affected by with HIV and AIDS - Working: - to produce, translate and implement research outputs to address disease constraints, - to ensure the research results are relevant, acceptable, implementable and effective - Building capacity in rural communities to enhance their influence in local, national, and international policymaking in urban agriculture.

Partners 'WHO the Program team will work with to achieve the Vision Stakeholders Partners ANY individual, group or institution with an interest or likely to be affected positively or negatively by Vision or Mission an ability/opportunity to support intention BEYOND the Program s sphere of influence

Boundary partners because, even though the program will work with them to effect change, it does not control them. BUT the power to influence development rests with them. The Project is on the boundary of their world. Program Boundary Partner Program relevance & viability Program Delivery Program Results

Answers to questions such as: - Who will be the most important actors to work with? - On whose actions does the success of the program most depend? - Among which actors does the program want to encourage change so that they can contribute to the vision? - Who can the program influence most directly? - Who can help or hinder its work?

To identify the important partners: ACTOR ANALYSIS - Who are the players in the systems? - Where is the transformation sought? - Who is important in the transformation sought? - Who then will be the Boundary partner? Strategic Partner? - How can we use the relationship to support the changes?

Exercise: Who are your boundary partners? Task: Each person, or group from a Demonstration City, draw a depiction of your boundary partners

Boundary Partners Outcome Challenges Boundary Partners Progress Markers

- Changes sought or those the Project will support in identified KEY Boundary Partners (BPs). Outcomes sought. - Outcome Challenge: The ultimate, most ideal change in the BP - Progress Markers: Gradual change, transformational, starting from the immediate reaction after encounter. What progressive changes the Program will observe starting from initial interaction?

- The effects of the program being there, on the partner with a focus on how actors behave as a result of being reached - How the behaviour, relationships, activities, or actions of an individual, group, or institution will change if the program is extremely successful - Idealistic but realistic. But avoid quantifying - The challenge is for the program to help bring about these changes

Answers to questions such as: Describe the boundary partner`s contributions to the vision: - In order to contribute to the vision, how will the Boundary Partner be behaving or acting differently? - How will existing ones change? - What new relationships will have been formed? Describe the ideal behaviours Are about a single boundary partner Remember, the challenge is for the program to help bring about these changes

What changes? Individual level: Behaviors and Attitudes; Activities or actions Group, Organization, Institute level: Policies, laws, regulations, ways of working

For each Boundary partner, this is a list of GRADUALLY DEVELOPING CHANGES towards targeted Outcome Challenge Refers to behavioural indications of progressive change. Starts from what is current practice or immediate reaction (when Project initiates interaction) to what would be the case at Vision level. an indication of progress over time or more commitment to change.

Progress Markers = Change Markers Love to see PMs Like to see PMs Expect to see PMs Photo : CIP

Answers to questions such: As the Project exerts its influence, what do you in the Boundary partner Expect to see? Initially Like to see? Progress over time Commitment to change Love to see? Finally

Example with informal milk traders Expect to see the traders Attending trainings because it is necessary for certification and licensing that will allow them to operate Investing in aspects of their activities that reflect commercial value of clean milk delivery and marketing Like to see the traders Applying skills/practices gained learned from the training on clean milk delivery and marketing Consulting with trainers and regulators for advice on how to enhance in clean milk delivery and marketing Love to see the traders Promoting the value of clean milk to consumers and why consumers should be sensitive to clean milk delivery Proactively seeking training because they see the value to the profitability and future of business

Example with informal milk traders Progress Marker Attending trainings because it is necessary Investing in clean milk delivery and marketing Applying skills/practices gained learned from the training Consulting with trainers and regulators for advice Promoting the value of clean milk to consumers Recordable observations Traders attendance in training sessions The presence and use of cleaning equipment and chemicals Traders use of cleaning equipment and chemicals; use of hygienic containers Trainees suggesting training subjects; asking questions to further improve cleanliness Traders marketing approaches that emphasize or position themselves as clean sources NOT price.

Trying out Progress Markers OUTCOME CHALLENGE The program intends to see researchers in developing countries that have gained the expertise required to carry out HIV/AIDS research in a multidisciplinary fashion using quantitative, qualitative, and/or participatory methodologies. They are conducting research on the legislative, economic, social, and health aspects of HIV/AIDS with special emphasis on vulnerable groups including youth and women. They are providing credible evidence that allows research findings to be translated into effective HIV/AIDS policies and programs. They are skillfully disseminating research results in the appropriate format for the audience (e.g., to the scientific community, the general public, NGOs, government officials). They are successfully obtaining funding from multiple sources to conduct HIV/AIDS research. More experienced researchers are mentoring those new to the field and HIV/AIDS researchers globally are engaged in productive communications using various means especially electronic networks.

Strategy Maps For each Boundary partner: What the Project WILL DO do to influence desired changes in the Partner along the Progress Markers identified. Diverse range (An array) of ACTIVITIES: -Aimed at Partner -Aimed at Partner s environment -Cause, Persuade, Support

List out all possible Program Activities that will: Cause Persuade Support Individual Partner Force or compel change Convince Educate Mentor, Guide Partner s environment Set rules, guidelines. Laws & Regulation Broadly disseminate Set Policy Guidelines Create learning links Provide support network

Answers to questions such as: Cause Persuade Support Individual Partner What will be done to produce an immediate change in the partner? What will be done to build capacity in the partner? How will you support, guide and mentor the partner? Partner s environment What will be done to compel immediate change in the system? What will you to increase awareness need for change in the system? What will you do to provide a support system that will sustain system transformation?

Organizational Practices - The Project as a Boundary Partner Are standard good management principles - activities that should wisely be practiced. This is where WE debate 'what is right and wrong with US as a Project or Program where we get to be honest about ourselves and decide if WE ARE STILL RELEVANT in the innovation equation and what we seek to achieve

Organizational Practices 8 Management Activities (could be more) Answers to questions the Project will do to 1. Prospect for new ideas, opportunities, resources 2. Seek feedback from key informants 3. Obtain support of next highest power 4. Assess and (re)design products, services, systems and procedures

Organizational Practices 8 Management Activities (could be more) Answers to questions the Project will do to 5. Check up on those served to add value 6. Share your best wisdom with the world 7. Experiment to remain innovative 8. Engage in organizational reflection

Organizational Practices 8 Management Activities (could be more) Through organizational practices, we constantly review our own performance in line with our Vision and Mission, developing Outcomes and what the Project Stakeholders reflect of us

Monitoring elements: Changes in behaviours, actions, activities and relationships among the key boundary partners The Strategies the Programme is employing to encourage the changes The functioning of the Programme as an Organizational unit

Monitoring elements: Changes in behaviours, actions, activities and relationships among the key boundary partners -What progress markers have been achieved? -What evidence demonstrates these changes? Mapping of Outcomes!!!!

Monitoring elements: The Strategies the Programme is employing to encourage the changes -What mix of strategies are we employing? -Are our partners satisfied? Is there transformation? -Can we improve?

Monitoring elements: The functioning of the Programme as an organizational unit -How are we doing in helping our partners? -Are we learning from experience?

Monitoring Challenges: Takes time, resources, commitment and effort Requires getting together to collect and reflect on data and program s work; -Not too frequent -Not to far apart -Suggestion of every 2 3 months

Monitoring plan (help prioritize): : Priority: Boundary partner progress Proposed Tool: Outcome journal Program Strategies Strategy journal Program Organizational Practices Performance journal

Developing an Outcome Journal Work dating from to (Reporting period): Contributors to monitoring update: BP s Outcome challenge: LMH measure (Your rating of achievement, e.g. Low = 0 40%, Medium = 41 80%, High = 81 100%) LMH Progress Marker Who

Developing an Outcome Journal LMH Progress Marker Who Expect to see the BP Like to see the BP Love to see the BP

Description of change: Developing an Outcome Journal Contributing factors: Sources of evidence: Un-anticipated change: Lessons/Required program changes/reactions:

Developing a Strategy Journal Work dating from to (Reporting period): Contributors to monitoring update: Strategy being monitored: Strategy type (I-1, I-2,.. E-3) Describe the activity: (What did you do? With whom? When?) Effectiveness of strategy: Outputs:

Developing a Strategy Journal Describe the activity: (What did you do? With whom? When?) Effectiveness of strategy: Outputs: Required program follow-up: Lessons: Date of next monitoring meeting:

Developing a Performance Journal List the organizational practices: 1. Prospect for new ideas, opportunities, resources 2. Seek feedback from key informants 3. Obtain support of next highest power 4. Assess and (re)design products, services, systems and procedures 5. Check up on those served to add value 6. Share your best wisdom with the world 7. Experiment to remain innovative 8. Engage in organizational reflection

Developing a Performance Journal Work dating from to (Reporting period): Contributors to monitoring update: Practice 1: Prospecting for new ideas, opportunities, resources Example or Indicator: Sources of evidence: Lessons:

Developing a Performance Journal Practice 2: Seeking feedback from key informants Example or Indicator: Sources of evidence Lessons: Practice 3: Obtaining the support of your next highest power

Gathering the data Regular face - to face meetings where observed changes are recorded Electronic data sheets to be filled when changes are noted Interview or focus groups discussion with boundary partners

Note It is recommended to combine the OM monitoring approach with other M & E approaches to make the process inclusive and the results more acceptable Because OM enables a team to use ongoing feedback to track progress, make corrections and report results at any stage of an initiative.

For more information For more information & to share your experiences http://www.idrc.ca/evaluation Examples of OM Use http://web.idrc.ca/en/ev-27705-201-1-do_topic.html