Unconsolidated Undrained Strength Test

Similar documents
Soil Mechanics. Outline. Shear Strength of Soils. Shear Failure Soil Strength. Laboratory Shear Strength Test. Stress Path Pore Pressure Parameters

Drained and Undrained Conditions. Undrained and Drained Shear Strength

KWANG SING ENGINEERING PTE LTD

INTRODUCTION TO SOIL MODULI. Jean-Louis BRIAUD 1

Figure CPT Equipment

GDS Triaxial Automated System (GDSTAS)

CEEN Geotechnical Engineering Laboratory Session 7 - Direct Shear and Unconfined Compression Tests

SOIL-LIME TESTING. Test Procedure for. TxDOT Designation: Tex-121-E 1. SCOPE 2. APPARATUS 3. MATERIALS TXDOT DESIGNATION: TEX-121-E

Soil Mechanics SOIL STRENGTH page 1

GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN MANUAL

TECHNICAL REPORT ON SCALA DYNAMIC CONE PENETROMETER IRREGULARITY

1 Mobilisation and demobilisation 1 Deep boring sum 2 Cone penetration tests sum 3 Miscellenous tests sum

Tensile Testing Laboratory

c. Borehole Shear Test (BST): BST is performed according to the instructions published by Handy Geotechnical Instruments, Inc.

Soil Mechanics. Soil Mechanics

LABORATORY DETERMINATION OF CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO

Cone Penetration Testing (CPT) Michael Bailey, P.G. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Savannah District

ENCE 4610 Foundation Analysis and Design

DIRECT SHEAR TEST SOIL MECHANICS SOIL MECHANICS LABORATORY DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF MORATUWA SRI LANKA

EVALUATION OF STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES OF LIME STABILIZED SOILS AND AGGREGATES VOLUME 3: MIXTURE DESIGN AND TESTING PROCEDURE FOR LIME STABILIZED SOILS

NUMERICAL MODELLING OF PIEZOCONE PENETRATION IN CLAY

CONSTANT HEAD AND FALLING HEAD PERMEABILITY TEST

Numerical Analysis of Texas Cone Penetration Test

product manual HS-4210 HS-4210_MAN_09.08 Digital Static Cone Penetrometer

Tex-421-A, Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens

Soil Strength. Performance Evaluation of Constructed Facilities Fall Prof. Mesut Pervizpour Office: KH #203 Ph: x4046

GUIDELINE FOR HAND HELD SHEAR VANE TEST

Hollow Cylinder Apparatus (GDS SS-HCA)

The University of Toledo Soil Mechanics Laboratory

METHOD OF TEST FOR DETERMINATION OF PERMEABILITY OF GRANULAR SOILS

SPECIFICATIONS FOR PRECAST MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SYSTEM (revised 11/5/13)

SOIL MECHANICS Assignment #4: Soil Permeability.

Module 1 : Site Exploration and Geotechnical Investigation. Lecture 4 : In-situ tests [ Section 4.1: Penetrometer Tests ] Objectives

SHORE A DUROMETER AND ENGINEERING PROPERTIES

4.3 Results Drained Conditions Undrained Conditions References Data Files Undrained Analysis of

ESTIMATION OF UNDRAINED SETTLEMENT OF SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS ON LONDON CLAY

SETTLEMENT OF EMBANKMENT DAMS DON T FORGET ABOUT THE BEDROCK. Abstract

Objectives. Experimentally determine the yield strength, tensile strength, and modules of elasticity and ductility of given materials.

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania PA Test Method No. 632 Department of Transportation October Pages LABORATORY TESTING SECTION. Method of Test for

Period #16: Soil Compressibility and Consolidation (II)

TEST REPORT. Rendered to: LMT-Mercer Group, Inc. For: PRODUCT: 4" x 4" and 5" x 5" PVC Porch Posts with Aluminum Reinforcing

Interpretation of clogging effects on the hydraulic behavior of ion treated geotextiles

When to Use Immediate Settlement in Settle 3D

Work Type Definition and Submittal Requirements

Using the Dynamic Cone Penetrometer and Light Weight Deflectometer for Construction Quality Assurance

Determination of Thermal Conductivity of Coarse and Fine Sand Soils

Dr John J M Powell Geolabs Ltd

Geotechnical Characteristics of Two Different Soils and their Mixture and Relationships between Parameters

Specification Guidelines: Allan Block Modular Retaining Wall Systems

GRADATION OF AGGREGATE FOR CONCRETE BLOCK

Geotechnical Measurements and Explorations Prof. Nihar Ranjan Patra Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur

Module 5 (Lectures 17 to 19) MAT FOUNDATIONS

Validation of Cable Bolt Support Design in Weak Rock Using SMART Instruments and Phase 2

CONCRETE SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL SYSTEM

CIVL451. Soil Exploration and Characterization

The University of Toledo Soil Mechanics Laboratory

MECHANICS OF SOLIDS - BEAMS TUTORIAL 2 SHEAR FORCE AND BENDING MOMENTS IN BEAMS

Impacts of Tunnelling on Ground and Groundwater and Control Measures Part 1: Estimation Methods

SIENA STONE GRAVITY RETAINING WALL INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS. Prepared by Risi Stone Systems Used by permission.

Technical Notes 3B - Brick Masonry Section Properties May 1993

PART I SIEVE ANALYSIS OF MATERIAL RETAINED ON THE 425 M (NO. 40) SIEVE

Table of Contents 10.1 GENERAL

How To Design A Foundation

Activity 2.3b Engineering Problem Solving Answer Key

Packaged-Products for Parcel Delivery System Shipment 70 kg (150 lb) or Less

NOTE: FOR PROJECTS REQUIRING CONTRACTOR MIX DESIGN, THE DESIGN PROCEDURES ARE SPECIFIED IN THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS OF THE CONTRACT.

Geotechnical Investigation using Standard Penetration Test (SPT) in Rangamati, Bandarban and Khagrachari Towns

ALLOWABLE LOADS ON A SINGLE PILE

In-situ Density Determination by Sand Replacement Method

Lymon C. Reese & Associates LCR&A Consulting Services Tests of Piles Under Axial Load

Shrinkage and Creep Properties of High-Strength Concrete Up To 120 MPa

METU DEPARTMENT OF METALLURGICAL AND MATERIALS ENGINEERING


QUESTION TO AUDIENCE

Effect of grain size, gradation and relative density on shear strength and dynamic cone penetration index of Mahi, Sabarmati and Vatrak Sand

FUNDAMENTALS OF CONSOLIDATION

Lab for Deflection and Moment of Inertia

State of the Practice: Geotechnical Laboratory Testing

Constant Rate of Strain Consolidation with Radial Drainage

Collapse of Underground Storm Water Detention System

Behaviour of buildings due to tunnel induced subsidence

Geotechnical Testing Methods II

CREEP AND REPEATED CREEP-RECOVERY AS RUTTING PERFORMANCE TESTS FOR AIRPORT HMA MIX DESIGN

Pin & Vee Block Test Machine

Impact testing ACTIVITY BRIEF

LABORATORY CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES

The University of Toledo Soil Mechanics Laboratory

SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT

Laboratory Evaluation of Asphalt Rubber Mixtures Using the Dynamic Modulus (E*) Test

Solid Mechanics. Stress. What you ll learn: Motivation

7.2.4 Seismic velocity, attenuation and rock properties

Math Matters: Dissecting Hydrometer Calculations

Prelab Exercises: Hooke's Law and the Behavior of Springs

MECHANICS OF SOLIDS - BEAMS TUTORIAL TUTORIAL 4 - COMPLEMENTARY SHEAR STRESS

The Strength of Concrete

Tests and Analyses on Shear Strength Increment of Soft Soil under Embankment Fill

Penetration rate effects on cone resistance measured in a calibration chamber

SD-0150 GENERAL PURPOSE ABS (Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene) (TA)

A new method of measuring plastic limit of fine materials

Transcription:

University of Texas at Arlington Geotechnical Engineering Laboratory Unconsolidated Undrained Strength Test Lecture Notes # 10

Definitions, Objectives and Applications Objective To determine the shear strength of the soil by Unconsolidated Undrained test Significance and Applications A quick test to obtain the shear strength parameters of both fine and coarse grained soils either in undisturbed or remolded state The test is not applicable when the rate of construction is slow allowing consolidation of soil The test is different from the UCS test in a way that the confinement from the surrounding soil in side the ground can be simulated by applying water. Remember that UCS is unconfined Hence the test is representative of soils in construction sites where the rate of construction is very fast and the pore waters do not have enough time to dissipate Total stress parameters are obtained as portion of load applied is also received by the water Quick results. Economical testing. The designs using UU parameters are mostly conservative Some useful terminology in triaxial testing Total stress: σ = γ.h Pore water pressure: u = γ w.h Effective stress: σ = σ u Confining pressure: σ 3 Deviatoric stress: σ d Axial stress: σ 1 = σ d + σ 3

Equipment Triaxial Machine Specimen preparation equipment Sample extruder Balance Test Procedure Remolded specimens are prepared in the laboratory depending on the proctors data at the required molding water content http://geotech.uta.edu/lab/main/index.htm (look for UU test in the menu) If testing undisturbed specimens retrieved from the ground by various sampling techniques, trim the samples into regular triaxial specimen dimensions (2.8 x 5.6 ) There will be a significant variation in strength of undisturbed and remolded samples Measure the diameter and length of the specimen to be tested If curing the sample (treated soils), wrap the samples in a geotextile and then a zip bag. Place the sample in a humidity room maintained at a relative humidity of 90% Prior to testing, avoid any moisture loss in the sample, place on a triaxial base (acrylic). The ends of the sample are assumed to be frictionless The triaxial cell is placed above the sample and required confinement is applied simulating the effect of surrounding soil at that depth The rate of strain is maintained at 1.2700 mm/min as per ASTM specifications The data acquisition system collects real time data and the test is stopped when there is a drop observed in the strain versus load plot

Triaxial Setup Placing the specimen Placing the triaxial cell Apply confinement Adjust the drainage and inlet valves as shown Real time data from data acquisition system (DAS)

Interpretation of data for UU test The test results are saved as an EXCEL sheet and contain the load (in kg-force) and strain in (mm). This section explains how to apply the area correction and interpret the test results H Axial strain, ε a = 100 H o Stress, F σ= where, A c Ai A c = 1 ε A i is the initial area of the specimen (πr i 2 ) Sample Data sheet from the test 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Load, F (kgf) Deformation (mm) Load Tarred H (mm) H (inches) Load, F (lb) vertical strain= H /H o Corrected area, A c Stress (psi) 8 6.28 2 0.0000 0.0000 4.4092 0.0000 3.1400 1.4042 10 6.28 4 0.0000 0.0000 8.8183 0.0000 3.1400 2.8084 10 6.28 4 0.0000 0.0000 8.8183 0.0000 3.1400 2.8084 12 6.3 6 0.0200 0.0008 13.2275 0.0002 3.1405 4.2119 14 6.31 8 0.0300 0.0012 17.6367 0.0002 3.1407 5.6155 17 6.33 11 0.0500 0.0020 24.2504 0.0004 3.1412 7.7200 19 6.36 13 0.0800 0.0031 28.6596 0.0006 3.1420 9.1215 19 6.37 13 0.0900 0.0035 28.6596 0.0007 3.1422 9.1208 21 6.4 15 0.1200 0.0047 33.0688 0.0009 3.1430 10.5215 23 6.41 17 0.1300 0.0051 37.4780 0.0010 3.1432 11.9234 Area correction is applied in the interpretation of the results as the cross section of the sample doesn t remain constant as the load is increased. There will be an observed bulge at the middle of the specimen due to which it is almost presumptive to consider uniform stress through out the specimen length. However, the volume of the specimen is assumed constant. Columns 1 and 2 are obtained from the test results Column 3 = {Column 1 6 kg-f}. (Tarring the load and making it start from zero) Column 4 = {Column 2 6.28 m} (Tarring the deformation and starting it from zero) Column 5 = H in inches Column 6 = Load in lb Column 7 = Strain calculated from H o Column 8 = Area correction from the above equation Column 9 = F/A c Plot column 7 (on x-axis) against column 9 (y axis)