Mazda CX-3 79% 85% 84% 64% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.



Similar documents
Mazda MX-5 84% 80% 64% 93% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Roadster sports. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

Suzuki Vitara SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Year Of Publication Driver Passenger Rear FRONTAL CRASH PROTECTION

Driver (Single Stage), Passenger (Single Stage) Driver (single), Passenger (single)

Driver (Single Stage), Passenger (Single Stage) Driver (single), Passenger (single)

Driver (Single Stage), Passenger (Single Stage) Driver (single), Passenger (single)

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer

Driver (Single Stage), Passenger (Single Stage) Driver (double), Passenger (single)

Skoda Octavia 66% 82% ADULT OCCUPANT. Total 34 pts 93% Skoda Octavia 1.6 'Ambition', LHD SIDE IMPACT REAR IMPACT (WHIPLASH) 2,6 pts WHIPLASH

Mercedes-Benz C-Class

AUDI A3 Sportback e-tron

FORD FIGO (NO AIRBAGS)

NEW CAR SAFETY INNOVATIONS ANCAP RATINGS. Michael Paine - ANCAP Technical Manager

European New Car Assessment Program (EuroNCAP) and Crash Test Ratings of New Vehicles

Make the right choice. Vehicle safety advice for older drivers

20XX. Car safety rating 2015 by Folksam

The SIPS (Side Impact Protection System) includes side and Inflatable Curtain (IC) airbags that protect both front and rear occupants.

Safety performance comparisons of different types of child seats in high speed impact tests

EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Euro NCAP) FILM & PHOTO PROTOCOL

NCAP New Car Assessment Programme

Existing safety technology is the driverless vehicle already here? Matthew Avery Safety Research Director

UNDERSTANDING YOUR VEHICLE S. What every driver and passenger should know

Balancing Active and Passive Safety

Accidents with Pedestrians and Cyclists in Germany Findings and Measures

CASPER CHILD ADVANCED SAFETY PROJECT FOR EUROPEAN ROADS. Car Technology. SPEAKER: Britta Schnottale BASt. CASPER and EPOCh Final Workshop 13 th -15

RCAR Low-speed structural crash test protocol

CRASH TESTS TO ASSESS THE SECONDARY SAFETY OF A LARGE MPV

Factors related to serious injury in post ncap european cars involved in frontal crashes

Collision Avoidance. The car we couldn t crash! The future for drivers. Compare the technologies. research news

Child Safety in Cars. Federal Highway Research Institute

Improving Driving Safety Through Automation


LATIN AMERICAN & CARRIBEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Latin NCAP) ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL ADULT OCCUPANT PROTECTION 2016

CRASH PROTECTION FOR CHILDREN IN AMBULANCES Recommendations and Procedures* Marilyn J. Bull, M.D., Kathleen Weber, Judith Talty, Miriam Manary

Vehicle Safety Systems

In-vehicle Technologies for Increasing Seat Belt Use

Virginia's Child Passenger Safety Laws

A name a commitment! These are the criteria which have characterized the development of dependable everyday cars up to the present time.

Testimony of Ann Wilson House Energy & Commerce Committee Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing and Trade, October 21, 2015

The New Car Assessment Program Suggested Approaches for Future Program Enhancements

Paper Number Paine, Page 1

Contents. 1. What types of car restraints are available? Buying a car child seat- checklist Tips for fitting car seats 6

Sources of data. IIHS MDB (SUV) Side Impact Test at 50km/h (from 2003) NHTSA Crabbed MDB Side Impact Test at 62 km/h (from 1997)

Field Accident Data Analysis of 2 nd Row Children and Individual Case Reviews

Car Crash Design Lab

Supplementary restraints system

Shopping for a. safer car. insurance institute for highway safety

Assessment of Whiplash Protection in Rear Impacts. Crash Tests and Real-life Crashes

FIMCAR III Car-to-Car Test Results

The Increasing Role of SUVs in Crash Involvement in Germany

Auto Insurers Adventure in US Highway Safety

Child in Car Safety Leaflet 1/8/07 8:54 am Page 1 Child In Car Safety

CHILD CAR RESTRAINT SYSTEMS

BIGGER, BETTER, STRONGER NEW!

PERSONAL SAFETY child passenger safety

MOTOR VEHICLE COLLISION/PERSONAL INJURY QUESTIONNAIRE

MOTOR VEHICLE COLLISION/PERSONAL INJURY QUESTIONNAIRE

Injury Prevention & Crash Dynamics

Airbags and Pretensioners. Emergency Response Guide

Promoting advanced vehicle safety technologies

SEAT BELTS AND AIRBAGS

PEDESTRIAN HEAD IMPACT ANALYSIS

Quantifying the risk of the connected and autonomous vehicle

CONSUMER INFORMATION ON THE CRASH PERFORMANCE OF CARS: The role of the EU

ANCIS. The Australian National Crash In-depth Study. David Logan (MUARC)

Presented by the expert of France 55th Session of the UN ECE Working Party on Passive Safety GRSP May 2014 Agenda Items 15

Talking Points. About Roadway Users

REARWARD- & FORWARD-FACING USER MANUAL ECE R GROUP WEIGHT AGE 0+/ kg 6m-4y

#stopthecrash AUTONOMOUS EMERGENCY BRAKING THE NEXT SEAT BELT?

Vehicle Safety. Vehicle Safety web text. Please refer to this document as: SafetyNet (2009) Vehicle Safety, retrieved <add date of retrieval here>

Buckle Up! A Lesson on Car Seat Safety Playgroup #11

Pedestrian protection - Pedestrian in collision with personal car

PASSIVE SAFETY SYSTEMS

Volvo Trucks view on Truck Rollover Accidents

Motor Vehicle Collision Form

Traffic Safety Facts. Children Data. Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death for children from 2 to 14 years old.

Statement before Massachusetts Legislature s Joint Committee on Insurance. Institute Research on Cosmetic Crash Parts. Stephen L. Oesch.

Working Paper. Extended Validation of the Finite Element Model for the 2010 Toyota Yaris Passenger Sedan

U.S. CONSUMER CRASH TEST RESULTS AND INJURY RISK IN POLICE-REPORTED CRASHES

research Key Technologies for Preventing Crashes SPECIAL EDITION 10/NO.2 INSIDE: Youth Key P4 / Alco-locks P6 / Protecting Pedestrians P10

Event Data Recorder - Reference Document

Digges 1 INJURIES TO RESTRAINED OCCUPANTS IN FAR-SIDE CRASHES. Kennerly Digges The Automotive Safety Research Institute Charlottesville, Virginia, USA

Does the Federal government require them? No, the Federal government does not require manufacturers to install EDRs.

COLLISION AVOIDANCE FEATURES: INITIAL RESULTS

ENGELSK. Car safety. children and adults

REAL-WORLD PERFORMANCE OF CITY SAFETY BASED ON SWEDISH INSURANCE DATA

Experts in Safety, Security and Crash Repair

Thorsten Adolph, Marcus Wisch, Andre Eggers, Heiko Johannsen, Richard Cuerden, Jolyon Carroll, David Hynd, Ulrich Sander

CRS Misuse and ISOFIX and LATCH CRS Use in Israel Introduction

UPDATED REVIEW OF POTENTIAL TEST PROCEDURES FOR FMVSS NO. 208

Ambulance Re-design to Reduce EMS Injuries: Influencing Design through Standards Development. Paul H. Moore, NIOSH Division of Safety Research

INSURANCE INSTITUTE FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY 1005 NORTH GLEBE ROAD ARLINGTON, VA PHONE 703/ FAX 703/

What Research Has Show:

4 Dec 2003, IDnr The new Volvo V50

German Insurance Association No. 38. Compact accident research. Small-overlap frontal impacts involving passenger cars in Germany

Child Restraints questions and answers

Child Car Restraints

Position Is What Counts Kids in the Back

CYCLING IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA

Child Passenger Safety Cer6fica6on Training Program for La6n America and the Caribbean

Workshop of the Americas for Decisions on Traffic Safety and Education. Plenary Session IX: Financing Activities, Plans, and Programs

Transcription:

Mazda CX-3 Supermini 2015 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 85% 79% Pedestrian Safety Assist 84% 64% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type Mazda CX-3 2.0 'Core', LHD 5 door wagon Year Of Publication 2015 Kerb Weight VIN From Which Rating Applies Class 1231kg applies to all CX-3s of the specification tested Supermini SAFETY EQUIPMENT Driver Passenger Rear FRONTAL CRASH PROTECTION Frontal airbag Belt pretensioner Belt loadlimiter Knee airbag SIDE CRASH PROTECTION Side head airbag Side chest airbag Side pelvis airbag Euro NCAP Mazda CX-3 1/10

SAFETY EQUIPMENT (NEXT) Driver Passenger Rear CHILD PROTECTION Isofix Integrated CRS Airbag cut-off switch SAFETY ASSIST Seat Belt Reminder OTHER SYSTEMS Active Bonnet (Hood) ESC AEB City Speed Assistance System Lane Assist System The Safety Equipment includes those items relevant for the year of assessment Fitted to test car as standard Fitted to test car as option Not applicable Not available Not fitted to test car but available as option Euro NCAP Mazda CX-3 2/10

ADULT OCCUPANT Total 32.4 Pts / 85% GOOD ADEQUATE MARGINAL WEAK POOR Frontal Offset Deformable Barrier 7.5 Pts Frontal Full Width 7.1 Pts Passenger Driver Rear Passenger Driver Whiplash Rear Impact 1.8 Pts Lateral Impact 16 Pts Front seat Rear seat Car Pole AEB City 0 Performance: Euro NCAP Mazda CX-3 3/10

ADULT OCCUPANT Total 32.4 Pts / 85% Comments on Adult Occupant The passenger compartment of the CX-3 remained stable in the offset frontal impact. For the front passenger dummy, all critical body areas were well protected. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs for both the driver and passenger. Mazda showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the fullwidth frontal test, the driver passenger scored maximum points with good protection of all body areas. However, readings of chest compression in the rear passenger dummy indicated weak protection of that body region, despite the standard-fit seatbelt pre-tensioners and load-limiters in the rear seats. In the side barrier test, the CX-3 scored full points with good protection of all critical areas. Even in the more severe side pole impact, full points were scored. The front seats and head restraints provided good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. However, a geometric assessment of the rear seats and restraints indicated poor whiplash protection for the occupants of these seats. A low-speed autonomous emergency braking system is available as an option. As it is not standard equipment, it did not qualify for inclusion in the assessment. Euro NCAP Mazda CX-3 4/10

CHILD OCCUPANT Total 39.1 Pts / 79% GOOD ADEQUATE MARGINAL WEAK POOR Crash Test Performance 22.1 Pts 18 months old child 12 Pts 36 months old child 10.1 Pts Tested restraint (Fit): Römer BabySafe + ISOFIX Base Tested restraint (Fit): Römer Duo Plus Good Safety Features 5 Pts Front Passenger 2nd row outboard 2nd row center Isofix i-size Integrated CRS Fitted to test car as standard Not on test car but available as option Not available CRS Installation Check 12 Pts Install without problem Safety critical problem Install with care Installation not allowed Infants up to 13 kg Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) Euro NCAP Mazda CX-3 5/10

CHILD OCCUPANT Total 39.1 Pts / 79% Infants and toddlers up to 18 kg BeSafe izi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) Toddlers from 9 to 18 kg Römer King Plus (Belt) Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) Toddlers over 18 kg Römer KidFix (Belt) Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) Euro NCAP Mazda CX-3 6/10

CHILD OCCUPANT Total 39.1 Pts / 79% Seat Position Front 2nd row PASSENGER LEFT CENTER RIGHT Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) Römer King Plus (Belt) Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) Römer KidFix (Belt) Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) BeSafe izi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) Install without problem install with care safety critical problem Installation not allowed Comments on Child Occupant The CX-3 scored maximum points for its protection of the 1½ year dummy in the dynamic impact tests. In the frontal test, forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive. In the side impact, both child dummies were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the likelihood of head contact with parts of the car interior. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the CX-3 is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car. Euro NCAP Mazda CX-3 7/10

PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION Total 30.3 Pts / 84% GOOD ADEQUATE MARGINAL WEAK POOR Pedestrian Protection 30.3 Pts Head Impact Pelvis Impact Leg Impact 20 Pts 4.3 Pts 6 Pts Comments on Pedestrian The bumper scored maximum points for its protection of pedestrians' legs, showing good results in all areas tested. However, protection of the pelvis region was mixed, with areas of good, poor and weak performance. The bonnet of the CX-3 performed well and results were good or adequate over almost the entire bonnet surface. Euro NCAP Mazda CX-3 8/10

SAFETY ASSIST Total 8.3 Pts / 64% GOOD ADEQUATE MARGINAL WEAK POOR Speed Assistance 1.3 Pts System Name Speed Limit Information Function Warning Function Speed Limitation Function Adjustable Speed Limiter N/A Manually set Manually set Electronic Stability Control 3 Pts System Name DSC PERFORMANCE Vehicle Yaw Rate @ COS + 1.00 s 3.3% meets ECE requirements Vehicle Yaw Rate @ COS + 1.75 s 3% meets ECE requirements Lateral Displacement @ BOS + 1.07 s 2.98 m meets ECE requirements Seat Belt Reminder 3 Pts Applies To All seats Warning Driver Seat front passenger(s) rear passenger(s) Visual Audible Pass Fail Not available Lane Support 1 Pts System Name Type LDWS Lane Departure Warning Operational From 70 Warning Audible & Visual PERFORMANCE LDW Confirmation Test Meets NHTSA requirements Euro NCAP Mazda CX-3 9/10

SAFETY ASSIST Total 8.3 Pts / 64% Comments on Safety Assist Electronic stability control is standard equipment, as is a seatbelt reminder for the front and rear seats. A driver-set speed limiter is available as an option and is expected to be fitted to most cars sold as is a lane departure warning system. An autonomous emergency braking system for the speeds typical of highway driving is available as an option but is not expected to be fitted enough vehicles to qualify for assessment. Euro NCAP Mazda CX-3 10/10