Genesee Advanced Water Treatment Facility



Similar documents
Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Implementation Actions

ALTERNATIVE SOURCES OF FUNDING FOR

Kansas City s Overflow Control Program

Sanitary Sewers LINK TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

DEQ Response to Comments regarding the Public Notice for a Coal Mining Project in the Panther Creek watershed In Craig and Nowata Counties.

Sec. 22a-1a page 1 (4-97)

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

Florida Department of Environmental Protection

American Society of Civil Engineers

US Army Corps of Engineers Authorities and Programs

Post-Wildfire Clean-Up and Response in Houston Toad Habitat Best Management Practices

Environmental Management Plan

Urban Stream Restoration Defining the Full Benefits of a Project. Warren C. High MACTEC Engineering and Consulting

STATE OF MICHIGAN. Bond Qualification Process Overview. School Bond Qualification and Loan Program Bureau of Bond Finance

As stewards of the land, farmers must protect the quality of our environment and conserve the natural resources that sustain it by implementing

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Environmental Assessment

Waukesha County. Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit Annual Report to the Land Use Parks & Environment Committee

Clean Water Services. Ecosystems Services Case Study: Tualatin River, Washington

Smoke Management Plan

Supplier Environmental Health and Safety Certification

STATEMENT OF RON HUNTSINGER NATIONAL SCIENCE COORDINATOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT U.S

Public Survey for Phase I

Ecosystem Services in the Greater Houston Region. A case study analysis and recommendations for policy initiatives

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 131 FERC 62,175 FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. United Water Conservation District Project No.

Urban Ecosystem Services Seattle s Urban Forest

2007 Operating Budget Capital Budget 2007 Proposed Water and Wastewater Service Rate

NASA Stennis Space Center Environmental Resources Document

TOWN OF SURFSIDE UTILITY UPGRADE PROJECT Project Completion

Sika Sarnafil World Class Roofing and Waterproofing

Restoring Anadromous Fish Habitat in Big Canyon Creek Watershed. Summary Report 2002

REPORT TO WILDERNESS MOUNTAIN WATER SERVICE COMMISSION MEETING OF TUESDAY, MARCH 31, 2015

9.1. Adequacy of Available Data and Monitoring Efforts

A. Describe the existing drainage patterns on-site as shown on Map I, including any potential flooding and erosion problems.

Waste Handling & Disposal

Recommended Practices Associated with Hydraulic Fracturing Operations

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN :-

CRS Report for Congress

WASTE Application Form - Dublin Waste to Energy SECTION J ACCIDENT PREVENTION & EMERGENCY RESPONSE

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION B, ELEMENT 4 WATER RESOURCES. April 20, 2010 EXHIBIT 1

CHAPTER 4 ALTERNATIVES COMPARISON

SPECIFICATIONS FOR APPROVED OFFSITE RECORDS STORAGE FACILITIES

Flood Risk Management

Flood Risk Management

understanding Sustainable Landscaping & Tree Preservation Standards

Historic Flood Impact on the Nashville Drinking Water System. Scott Potter, Director Metro Water Services, Nashville, TN

City of Dallas Wastewater Collection System: TCEQ Sanitary Sewer Outreach Agreement City Council Briefing January 17, 2007

Angora Fire Restoration Activities June 24, Presented by: Judy Clot Forest Health Enhancement Program

INNOVATION AND COST EFFECTIVE APPROACH TO POTABLE WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT STRATEGICALLY FOCUSED ON DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT By

Plan Groundwater Procurement, Implementation and Costs, prepared for the Brazos River Authority, July 2005.

Proposed Terms of Reference for EIA studies

Use of Green Roofs to Meet New Development Runoff Requirements. Greg Davis Nov. 8, 2007

March Prepared by: Irvine Ranch Water District Sand Canyon Avenue. Irvine, CA Contact: Natalie Likens (949)

COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW OPERATIONAL AND MAINTENANCE PLAN SUMMARY

RESTORATION & REVITALIZATION

AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2012 SCORING GUIDELINES

Harris County Flood Control District. Policy, Criteria, and Procedure Manual

How To Plan A Buffer Zone

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 625 Broadway, Albany, NY Environmental Self Audit For Small Businesses

Chapter 2 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for Park Operations

Contents. 1.0 Introduction Project definition Project brief Accommodation guidelines Objective 4

1. Name of the Project 2. Necessity and Relevance of JBIC s Assistance

Brushy Creek Municipal Utility District (the District) Brushy Bend Waterline Replacement Project Community Meeting February 6, 2014

Queen Lane Addition, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania is a building of approximately 25,000 ft². The client is Drexel University.

Triple Bottom Line Analysis for Green Infrastructure A Case Study 2012 ARCADIS

KAWERAU DISTRICT COUNCIL BUSINESS DISASTER RECOVERY PLAN 2011

City of West Palm Beach makes Water Treatment Plant Improvements by Implementing Priority Projects

Acton Quarry Extension. Halton Region June 11, 2014

Water Quality and Water Usage Surveys

A Developer s Guide: Watershed-Wise Development

Ann Arbor Wastewater Treatment Plant Facilities Renovations Project September 2015

How To Manage Water Resources In The Yakima Basin

Halton Region Planning & Public Works Committee Meeting July 8, 2015

COMMUNITY CERTIFICATIONS

The answers to some of the following questions are separated into two major categories:

Using Green Infrastructure to Manage Combined Sewer Overflows and Flooding

Birmingham City University / Students Union Aspects and Impacts Register. Waste. Impacts description

Green Spaces to Improve Waterways and Communities

GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES

Director of Utilities. Manager. Regulatory Compliance Supervisor. Distribution Supervisor. Utilities Analyst. Account Clerk. Water

1 INTRODUCTION. Kayenta Complex Page 9 December 2011 Cumulative Hydrologic Impact Assessment

ENVIRONMENT ACT PROPOSED TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT NOVA SCOTIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE RAPID EIA STUDY FOR SHIVKAR LIGNITE BLOCK, DIST. BARMER, RAJASTHAN

CWSRF Project Descriptions and Examples for Green Project Reserve

ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN

SECTION EIGHT BONDING REQUIREMENTS

Transcription:

Genesee Advanced Water Treatment Facility State Revolving Fund Loan Public Hearing April 28, 2015

Project Purpose Upgrade critical components of the District's water system Develop a more robust water treatment facility that is capable of treating more challenging water and meeting future regulations Upgrade critical facilities to reduce electrical consumption, water use and operator time Photos of the Existing Genesee WTP

Upgrades to Base and Larkspur Pump Stations Replace equipment and electrical gear that is near the end of its useful life System upgrades will significantly reduce energy use for these facilities (estimated at 29% / 37%) Reduce operating costs (estimated at 37%) Provides better system function with fewer pumps for delivering a range of flows into the distribution system The Larkspur Pump Station is over 30 years old

Replacement of Pressure Reducing Stations (PRS) Removes stations that are located in roadways and don t have proper traffic loading Replaces facilities that are deteriorating and have reduced reliability Provides systems with proper ventilation and access to increase operator safety Provides new systems with the capacity needed to deliver higher flows for fire protection Old Pressure Reducing Stations will be replaced with new, reliable units

Replacement of Customer Water Meters Water industry standards recommend that meters be replaced every 15 years New units will reduce underrecording water use New units will include remote monitoring capabilities, thereby significantly reducing operator time used for meter reading New customer water meters will include remote monitoring capabilities

Construction of a New Advanced Water Treatment Facility (WTF) The existing water treatment plant is over 30 years old and approaching the end of its useful life The existing plant treatment processes were designed to meet less stringent filtration performance requirements The new Advanced WTF will be capable of treating more challenging raw water and meet future regulations The new Advanced WTF will provide enhanced treatment for removal of organic compounds The Genesee Raw Water Reservoir

Recommended Water Treatment Process Six potential processes were identified that can meet overall treatment goals An evaluation was performed that analyzed both benefits and costs for each system (costs include capital and O&M) Microfiltration with floc/sed pretreatment and granular activated carbon post treatment was selected Provides the highest Benefit Score Provides the highest Cost to Benefit Score Cost competitive compared to other options Positions the District well for future raw water quality challenges and potentially changing regulations Relatively simple and reliable to operate

Plant Site Selection Considerations Space Site and Building Access (trucks, chemicals, eqpt, FD) System Hydraulics Residuals Management and Disposal Utilities Land Acquisition Requirements Environmental Considerations Aesthetics and Public Perception Constructability / Cost

Site Design Concepts Locate the facilities on District property Keep the roof level as low as possible Keep as many large trees as possible Provide functional site access Integrate the plant into site contours View of the Administration Building / Advanced Water Treatment Facility Site from Daisy Lane

Architectural Renderings of the New Genesee Advanced WTF

Site Rendering

Project Budgets LOCATION INITIAL PROJECT BUDGET Advanced Water Treatment Facility $8,320,000 Pressure Reducing Stations (PRS) Stonecrop PRS $135,000 Holly PRS $145,000 Montane East PRS $145,000 North Bowl PRS $145,000 Pump Stations Base Pump Station $410,000 Larkspur Pump Station $410,000 Customer Water Meter Replacement $400,000 Financing/Issuance Costs $190,000 TOTAL $10,300,000

Impacts to Customer Water Bills Operation of the new Advanced WTF could increase operating costs from $275,000 per year up to $320,000 to $340,000 per year Increased operating pressures for the microfiltration system Chemicals for cleaning of the membrane system Replacement of Granular Activated Carbon However, upgrades to pump stations will result in an approximate $50,000/year cost decrease Efficiencies with reduced operator time and lower water use have not been taken into account In addition, Genesee repaid some bonds for the reservoir project early and refinanced the debt, thereby decreasing the mill levy for 2015

Project Locations

Federal Agencies Contacted U.S. Fish and Wildlife State Engineers Office, Colorado Division of Water Resources Colorado Historical Society U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Natural Resource Conservation Service Division of Wildlife Air Pollution Office, Colorado Dept of Public Health and Environment National Park Service

Potential Environmental Impacts Short term impacts during construction: Increased noise and ambient air particles during construction Increased site traffic Impacts to storm water quality until the site is fully restored Long-term impacts: Increased storm water runoff volume due to development Loss of a limited amount of habitat, with impacts to native vegetation

Mitigation Measures Comply with all Building and Regulatory Permits including dust, erosion control, and protection of storm water quality The project has gone through significant Public Participation process to date to receive comments on location and aesthetics Distributed vegetation will be reestablished by the District The site has been designed with an open land concept to allow wildlife free movement through the area Regulatory Permits require proper protection of construction sites to limit dust, erosion, impacts to storm water quality and the off-site tracking of dirt

Question and Answer