Edgefield Regional Stormwater Treatment (RST) Facility Tri-County Agricultural Area St. Johns River Water Management District Water Quality Draft Summary, December 2009 Alicia Steinmetz and Pam Livingston-Way, Lower St. Johns River Basin Program Introduction This is the fourth update on water quality for the Edgefield RST facility, which includes monthly data on concentrations of key water quality constituents from September 2007 August 2009 and data on water quality associated with storm events that occurred from June 2008-September 2009. In addition to these data collected by the Division of Environmental Sciences, this report provides operational updates. Detailed data analysis and discussion are not provided in this interim report, but they will be presented in an annual report. Annual reports will include analyses of cumulative, seasonal, and interannual treatment performance, along with estimates of load reductions from the watershed. Interim reports should be viewed as provisional progress reports and should not be considered definitive. Background Since 1998, agricultural best management practices (BMPs) designed to reduce nutrient rich runoff have been implemented in the tri-county agricultural area (TCAA), primarily through growers voluntarily participating in the St. Johns River Water Management District s TCAA Water Quality Protection Cost Share Program. Based on row crop acreage from 2000 land use data implementation of verified in-field BMPs (e.g., reduced fertilizer rates, fertilizer application timing, fertilizer placement, water table management, etc.) has been estimated to yield a 24% reduction in annual loadings of nitrogen and a 14% reduction in annual loadings of phosphorus (Pam Livingston-Way, SJRWMD Division of Environmental Sciences, pers. comm. 2008). Unfortunately, these nutrient reductions are not sufficient to reduce loads to the Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) mandated for the freshwater section of the river by the Clean Water Act after these waters were added to the 303 D list of impaired waters by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. In order to meet TMDL allocations for the freshwater DRAFT-Edgefield RST Water Quality Summary, December 2009 1
segment of the LSJR, the TCAA is obligated to implement BMPS on 100% of the total row crop acreage and achieve a 37% reduction in nitrogen and a 15% reduction in phosphorus (LSJR TMDL Executive Committee 2008). Model predictions suggest that nutrient reductions through full implementation of current in-field BMPs will not be sufficient to meet nitrogen and phosphorus reductions for the freshwater section of the river. Thus, the District constructed regional storm water treatment facilities to assist in meeting the TMDL allocations by improving the quality of water exiting the TCAA watershed. Project Objective The District purchased the Edgefield Tract in 2001 for the construction of a regional storm water treatment facility to treat nutrient-rich agricultural runoff in the high-priority Dog Branch subbasin. Dog Branch subbasin is 2,028 acres consisting of 65% agricultural land use. Prior to the District s purchase, the Edgefield Tract had been in agricultural production since the 1940s. Project goals are to reduce watershed loading of total nitrogen by 50%, total phosphorus by 60%, and total suspended solids by 70% from a combination of both ambient (e.g., baseflow, irrigation runoff) and storm events. Project Treatment Components The Edgefield RST was the second facility constructed in the TCAA (Figure 1). The RST is a BMP treatment train consisting of a 25-acre wet detention pond at the forefront, followed by a 56-acre constructed treatment wetland. The constructed wetland is a combination subsurface and surface flooded wetland. During the wetland construction phase in July 2007, soils were amended with a combination of a ferric water treatment residual and standard dolomite to bind legacy soil phosphorus resulting from 60 plus years of farming. Former agricultural sites have the potential to release stored phosphorus upon flooding (Pant and Reddy, 2003). Soil phosphorus tests conducted by the District determined there were elevated levels of phosphorus stored in the mineral soils. Additional work at the wetland site included the installation of approximately 176,607 wetland plants of varying species to promote habitat diversity and enhance treatment performance. Root zone oxygenation varies among wetland plant species, which influences chemical processes in wetland soils (Reddy et al., 2008). It is through these soil chemical processes that nutrient treatment occurs. DRAFT-Edgefield RST Water Quality Summary, December 2009 2
Operation and System Hydraulics Beginning in April 2006, the wet detention pond was intermittently the sole functioning treatment component. Full operation commenced in October 2007, at which time, both components of the treatment train were online (i.e., wet detention pond and constructed wetland). The RST operates by capturing a portion of agricultural runoff from Dog Branch. Runoff flows into a small forebay basin (i.e., approximately 0.25 acre) where it is then pumped into the 25-acre wet detention pond for initial treatment. The percentage of runoff treated by the RST is unknown at this time, but will be determined as the Division of Hydrologic Data Services will monitor Dog Branch flow and develop flow rating curves. However, the pump station was designed for up to 80% flow capture with pumps to accommodate peak flow rates of 30 cubic feet per second (cfs) and 15 cfs under general baseflow conditions. The RST system is dynamic and essentially event-driven by watershed hydraulic patterns related to seasonal climatic conditions as well as agricultural activities. Hydraulic loading entering the facility is dependent upon water level rise in Dog Branch, as a result of irrigation activities during the agricultural growing season (January May) and/or storm events and pump system capabilities. Tidal fluctuations can also affect Dog Branch water levels. Runoff volumes pumped into the RST from February 2008- September 2009 are presented in Table 1. Once runoff is pumped into the wet detention pond from the forebay basin and pond water level rises, water is discharged to the constructed wetland header ditch via a concrete weir outfall. Water stages up in the header ditch and flows into the wetland to create subsurface and/or surface flow, where it is eventually treated and discharged to the LSJR via Cat Branch. Hydrologic Monitoring Flow and Water Levels. The Environmental Sciences Division s (ES) Lower St. Johns River Basin Program (LSJR) staff continue to conduct weekly maintenance and equipment calibration at monitoring and telemetry stations, as well as daily remote monitoring of the pump system status and storm sampling programs. Since implementing a weekly maintenance schedule in January 2008, water level data collection at Dog Branch (inflow), pond outflow and wetland outflow has remained uninterrupted. DRAFT-Edgefield RST Water Quality Summary, December 2009 3
Water level data at the three stations have been recorded since February 2008; however, flow data are not yet available. Engineering staff are developing a weir equation for the pond and wetland outfall structures, and ES staff are working with the Division of Hydrologic Data Services (HDS) to develop flow rates for the Dog Branch station. HDS installed monitoring equipment and began collecting data in October 2008. Watershed pollutant load reductions and load reductions achieved by each treatment component of the RST cannot be determined until this work is complete. Water levels adjusted to water elevations (NGVD29) measured at the RST inflow (Dog Branch) from February 2008-September 2009 have ranged from 0.74-5.59 ft, and they include measurements affected by irrigation runoff during the agricultural growing season, and lack of agricultural activity during the fallow season and storm events. Water elevations greater than 1.75 ft. are typically associated with storm events. The highest recorded level of 5.59 ft occurred during Tropical Storm Fay in August 2008. Monthly average water levels ranged from 1.06-2.14 ft. Ambient and Storm Event Water Quality Data Pollutant loading cannot be calculated at this time due to the absence of flow data, and thus, only pollutant concentrations for ambient (e.g., baseflow, irrigation runoff) and storm events are presented in this report. However, it should be noted that comparison of inflow and outflow concentrations alone does not evaluate treatment performance accurately since some treatment systems can effectively capture and reduce the volume of water discharged, thus reducing the pollutant load (U.S. EPA 2008). Treatment performance based on reductions in pollutant loading will be estimated when flow and volume data become available. Ambient Water Quality Sampling. LSJR field staff continue to collect monthly grab samples on the same day at all locations to characterize water quality at the following: Dog Branch (inflow), inflow of the pond, outflow of the pond, inflow of the wetland header ditch, and outflow of the treatment system (wetland). Monthly data represent ambient conditions and are not associated with storm events. For purposes of this report, data are presented only for those stations that indicate overall system performance (i.e., Dog Branch (inflow), pond outflow, and wetland outflow) shown in Photo 1. DRAFT-Edgefield RST Water Quality Summary, December 2009 4
Ambient Data Interpretation. Lacking flow data, residence time for the pond cannot currently be estimated. Therefore, for the purpose of this water quality status report, the average residence time of the wet detention pond is assumed to be similar to that of the Deep Creek West (DCW) wet detention pond (e.g., 41 days, ranging from 9-72 days) (Yang and Richmond, 2009) because they are similar in design. Actual residence time may be greater given that the Edgefield pond is 25 acres and the DCW pond is 15 acres. Based on the assumed pond residence time and lag period between the RST inflow (Dog Branch) and the outflow of the pond, monthly water quality grab samples collected at the pond outflow station during a given month cannot be compared to the runoff in Dog Branch collected on the same day. Consequently, data have been plotted such that those collected at the inflow one month are compared to those collected at the pond outflow site in the following month. Similar methodology was used for the wetland outflow, except data were averaged over a two-month period to create sampling intervals. For example, sampling interval 5 (S5) represents Jan-08 inflow, Feb- 08 pond outflow, and the average of Feb/Mar-08 wetland outflow data (refer to Table 2 for a summary of sampling intervals). Wetland data are averaged over a two-month period based on the current assumption that wetland residence time is less than a month. Nominal residence time will be estimated when flow data become available. Beginning July 2008 wetland data were no longer averaged over a two-month period. Rather, additional sampling was conducted at the wetland outflow two weeks after collection at the pond outflow. Presented in Figures 2-5 in this fourth progress report are actual monthly ambient water quality concentration data (data are not interpolated) available to date spanning September 2007-August 2009 (sampling intervals S1-S23). Figures 6a-c to figures 8a-c present annual, growing season and fallow season percent reductions in average ambient concentrations for 2007-2009 for each of the treatment components and the overall system (i.e., inflow vs. pond outflow, pond outflow vs. wetland outflow, and inflow vs. wetland outflow). Figures 9a-c and figure 10 present annual, seasonal, and monthly rainfall for 2007-2009. Typically, the TCAA growing season is January May and the fallow season is June December. General water quality treatment trends can be discerned from the current analyte concentration data set; however, the true measure of treatment performance will be determined by mass load reductions. Presented in Table 3 are average ambient concentrations for the period of record DRAFT-Edgefield RST Water Quality Summary, December 2009 5
and percent reduction in average ambient concentration for the facility (i.e., inflow vs. wetland outflow concentration). Photo 1. Baseflow and automated storm sampler water quality monitoring stations. Inflow Pond Outflow Wetland Header Ditch Wetland Outflow Photo courtesy of John Richmond Storm Water Quality Sampling. Automated, refrigerated storm sampling units (ISCO Avalanche) are located at the inflow, pond outflow, and wetland outflow (Photo 1). Automated samplers are triggered by stage increases indicative of storm events, or they can be triggered manually to capture lag times at the pond and wetland outflow. In 2008, samplers were programmed to continue sampling for fourteen days once triggered. Fourteen sampling days were targeted to ensure complete capture of the storm hydrograph. Samples were collected at 6 hour intervals as a daily composite sample of four aliquots. After many attempts, it became apparent that the equipment/power supply were not sufficient to collect and refrigerate samples for fourteen days. Thus, the sampling program was revised in November 2008 the sampling program was revised to sample for seven days rather than fourteen once triggered. DRAFT-Edgefield RST Water Quality Summary, December 2009 6
The new program collects sample aliquots every 8 minutes for the first 2 hours to capture rise of the storm hydrograph and first-flush of nutrients, succeeded by sampling in equal time intervals for the remainder of the first day of the storm (for example if 4 hrs remain in the day then samples will be collected every 0.5 hr), and then every 3 hours per day as a daily composite sample of eight aliquots for the next six days. Consequently, more samples are collected per day with the modified sampling program (8 aliquot samples vs. 4 aliquot samples) to represent the respective daily average concentrations over a seven day period. Analyses of water level rises in Dog Branch during several storm events verified that storm hydrographs typically occurred over seven days. Analyte concentrations representing the first day of the storm (i.e., composite samples collected the first two hours and a composite sample collected the remainder of the day) were time-weighted and then averaged for purposes of this report lacking accurate flow data. District laboratory Quality Assurance and Quality Control was maintained as much as logistically possible considering sampling methodology. Samples were refrigerated within the autosampler unit when the first sample was collected. Sample temperatures were maintained according to the SJRWMD Field Standard Operating Procedures for Surface Water Sampling 2010 (FSOP SWS 2010) until samples were retrieved and transported to the District lab for analysis. Cooling of samples assists in reducing microbial activity and species transformation; however, specific analytes were required to be coded for Q=holding time exceeded, Y=samples not acid preserved within 15 minutes of collection, and J=sample not filtered within 15 minutes of collection (pers. comm. Steve Richter, SRJWMD Division of Laboratory Services). Sample containers were not pre-preserved upon deployment since some forms of nutrients (i.e., dissolved orthophosphate and dissolved nitrate+nitrite) and total suspended solids do not require acidification. Typically, samples were preserved between day 8 day 14 at the time they were filtered and submitted to the lab for analysis. Storm Data Interpretation. Composite samples have been collected during various storm events from June 2008 September 2009 to yield concentrations of total phosphorus, total nitrogen and total suspended solids at the inflow, pond outflow and wetland outflow. Storm event data collected in 2008 are presented in Figures 11-13. These data were collected using the original fourteen-day program, and due to power supply problems, capture of storm events at all three monitoring stations was DRAFT-Edgefield RST Water Quality Summary, December 2009 7
intermittent. Moreover, data collected from June 2008 to September 2008, and an additional several days in November, should be interpreted with caution due to insufficient cooling of samples caused by power interruptions. Data available thus far for 2009 are plotted in Figures 14a-c to 16a-c; monthly average nitrogen, phosphorus, and total suspended solids concentrations are summarized in Table 4. Automated samplers were not triggered at the pond and wetland in Mar-09, and in Apr-09 the sampler at the pond outflow was removed for electrical repairs. It should be noted that the data presented are based exclusively on concentrations, which do not account for potential differences in volumes discharged at the sampling stations. Nonetheless, the data provide a positive indication the facility is reducing pollutant concentrations effectively following storm events. When volume data become available, progress reports will include event mean concentrations for each event. Overall load reductions in pollutants following storms will be presented in annual reports. Summary Monthly ambient concentration data for the sampling period September 2007-August 2009 (sampling intervals S1-S23) for the overall RST (inflow vs. wetland outflow) indicated a 42% reduction in TP concentration; a 46% reduction in TN concentration; and a 69% reduction in TSS concentration (Table 3). Average ambient TN concentrations were 1.70 mg L -1 in the inflow; 1.33 mg L -1 at the pond outflow; and 0.92 mg L -1 at the wetland outflow. TP concentrations were 0.37 mg L -1 in the inflow; 0.28 mg L -1 at the pond outflow; and 0.21 mg L -1 at the wetland outflow. TSS concentrations were 8.78 mg L -1 in the inflow; 17.90 mg L -1 at the pond outflow; and 2.72 mg L -1 at the wetland outflow (Table 3). In general, annual percent reductions in total nitrogen and nitrate+nitrite in 2008 were achieved by each of the treatment components and the overall RST system. Percent reductions were calculated based on the treatment components of interest and the overall RST. For example, the percent reduction achieved by the pond was calculated by subtracting the average pond outflow concentration for the data period from the average inflow concentration for the data period, then dividing by the average inflow concentration for the data period and multiplying by 100 (i.e., concentration in concentration out/concentration in * 100). Likewise, percent reductions for the wetland were calculated using the average pond outflow concentration and the average wetland outflow concentration, and the overall DRAFT-Edgefield RST Water Quality Summary, December 2009 8
facility percent reduction was calculated using the average inflow concentration (i.e., Dog Branch) and the average wetland outflow concentration. Annual and fallow season data for 2009 are not yet available and data for 2007 were only collected from September to December. The greatest percent reductions in 2008 occurred between the inflow and wetland outflow with a reduction of 49% in total nitrogen and 99% in nitrate+nitrite. Thus, the wetland provided additional treatment of the pond-treated effluent (Figures 6a-f). Growing season (January through May) and fallow season (June through December) reductions in all three years followed the same trend, except there was no reduction in total nitrogen or nitrate+nitrite pond outflow concentrations compared to the inflow for the 2009 growing season (Figures 6a-f). Total phosphorus and orthophosphate followed the same trend as nitrogen with the greatest percent reduction in 2008 occurring between the inflow and the wetland outflow with a 62% reduction in total phosphorus and a 44% reduction in orthophosphate. Growing season reductions occurred in 2008 but not 2009 for both phosphorus and orthophosphate. However, fallow season reductions for both constituents did occur in 2007 and 2008. Data are not yet available for the 2009 fallow season to determine if an overall annual reduction in total phosphorus occurred (Figures 7a-f). Total suspended solids concentrations were reduced in the system (inflow vs. wetland outflow) in 2008, and in the growing seasons 2008 and 2009, and fallow seasons 2007 and 2008. However, reductions did not occur within the pond compared to the inflow on annual basis in 2008, nor in the growing and fallow seasons in 2008, and growing season 2009 (Figures 8a-c). Annual rainfall was slightly below average (48-52 ) for the area all three years, but growing season rainfall in 2009 was almost 3x the growing season rainfall in 2007 and 2008 (Figures 9a-c). A significant rainfall event of 13.8 occurred in May 2009 (Figure 10). In contrast, fallow season rainfall was 3x greater in 2007 and 2008 than in 2009. Likewise, significant rainfall events occurred in September 2007 and August 2008 of 13.3 and 14, respectively (Figure 10). Thus, seasonal differences in percent reductions for nitrogen, phosphorus and total suspended solids among the three years could be in part due to differences in rainfall and its effect on water quality pollutants. Overall, water quality concentrations associated with storm events (Figures 11-16) were less at the wetland outflow than the DRAFT-Edgefield RST Water Quality Summary, December 2009 9
inflow. Average storm event concentrations in 2008 and 2009 for the RST (inflow vs. wetland outflow) indicated a 77% reduction in TN; 91% reduction in TP; and a 97% reduction in TSS (Table 4). Average storm TN concentrations were 4.79 mg L -1 in the inflow; 2.41 mg L -1 at the pond outflow; and 1.11 mg L -1 at the wetland outflow. TP concentrations were 2.94 mg L -1 in the inflow; 0.56 mg L -1 at the pond outflow; and 0.26 mg L -1 at the wetland outflow. TSS concentrations were 123.15 mg L -1 in the inflow; 15.94 mg L -1 at the pond outflow; and 3.48 mg L -1 at the wetland outflow (Table 4). While these current treatment performance estimates derived from ambient and storm data represent only reductions in concentrations, these data are indeed encouraging and lead us to believe that the facility is effectively reducing pollutants. As flow and volume data become available, these data in conjunction with pollutant concentrations will be used to determine a more accurate assessment of treatment performance and watershed pollutant load reductions. DRAFT-Edgefield RST Water Quality Summary, December 2009 10
Literature Cited Livingston-Way, P. (2001). Water quality monitoring and assessment of agricultural best management practices in the Tri-County Agricultural Area. Palatka: St. Johns River Water Management District, Division of Environmental Sciences. [LSJR TMDL Executive Committee]. Lower St. Johns River Total Maximum Daily Load Executive Committee. (2008, October). Basin management action plan for the implementation of total maximum daily loads for nutrients adopted by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection for the Lower St. Johns River Basin. Pant, H.K. and K.R. Reddy (2003). Potential internal loading of phosphorus in a wetland constructed in agricultural land. Water Research 37, 965-972. Reddy K.R., M. Clark, P. Inglett, J. Jawitz, and T. Osborne (2008, June 23-26). Biogeochemistry of Wetlands. Science and Applications. University of Florida Wetland Biogeochemistry Lab, Soil and Water Science Department. Gainesville, FL, U.S. [U.S. EPA] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2008, February 04). Three Keys to BMP Performance - Concentration, Volume and Total Load. Retrieved August 18, 2008, from U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System: http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater/urbanbmp/bmptopic.cfm Yang, C. and J. Richmond (2009). Deep Creek West Regional Stormwater Treatment Facility, Treatment Performance and Treatment Efficiency for Phosphorus. Palatka: St. Johns River Water Management District, Division of Engineering. DRAFT-Edgefield RST Water Quality Summary, December 2009 11
Figure 1. Location of TCAA Regional Stormwater Treatment (RST) facilities. Edgefield RST DRAFT-Edgefield RST Water Quality Summary, December 2009 12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
Table 1. Estimated total volume pumped into the treatment facility from Dog Branch. Year 2008 Volume Pumped (cf) Year 2009 Volume Pumped (cf) Feb-08 187,200 Jan-09 3,739,482 Mar-08 2,478,429 Feb-09 3,210,543 Apr-08 4,950,738 Mar-09 8,785,044 May-08 2,167,997 Apr-09 4,222,518 Jun-08 879,544 May-09 13,528,614 Jul-08 6,935,762 Jun-09 5,968,449 Aug-08 7,774,236 Jul-09 2,692,434 Sep-08 26,309,250 Aug-09 8,460,157 Oct-08 18,935,460 Sep-09 29,766,060 Nov-08 9,353,250 Dec-08 2,199,915 DRAFT-Edgefield RST Water Quality Summary, December 2009 30
Table 2. Sampling interval months for each ambient monitoring station. Sampling Interval Inflow Pond Outflow Wetland Outflow S1 Sep-07 Oct-07 Oct/Nov-07 S2 Oct-07 Nov-07 Nov/Dec-07 S3 Nov-07 Dec-07 Dec-07/Jan-08 S4 Dec-07 Jan-08 Jan/Feb-08 S5 Jan-08 Feb-08 Feb/Mar-08 S6 Feb-08 Mar-08 Mar/Apr-08 S7 Mar-08 Apr-08 Apr/May-08 S8 Apr-08 May-08 May/Jun-08 (no data collected in Jun08; no flow exiting wetland S9 May-08 Jun-08 (no data collected; no flow exiting pond) Jun/Jul-08 (no data collected in Jun08; no flow exiting wetland S10 Jun-08 Jul-08 *Jul-08 S11 Jul-08 Aug-08 *Aug-08 S12 Aug-08 Sep-08 *Sep-08 S13 Sep-08 Oct-08 *Oct-08 S14 Oct-08 Nov-08 *Nov-08 S15 Nov-08 Dec-08 *Dec-08 S16 Dec-08 Jan-09 *Jan-09 S17 Jan-09 Feb-09 *Feb-09 S18 Feb-09 Mar-09 *Mar-09 S19 Mar-09 Apr-09 *Apr-09 S20 Apr-09 May-09 *May-09 S21 May-09 Jun-09 *Jun-09 S22 Jun-09 Jul-09 *Jul-09 S23 Jul-09 Aug-09 *Aug-09 *Wetland outflow sample collected two weeks following pond outflow collection. This method replaces averaging over a two-month period. DRAFT-Edgefield RST Water Quality Summary, December 2009 31
Table 3. RST ambient average water quality concentrations and average percent reduction in concentration. Sampling intervals S1-S23 (Sep-07 to Jul/Aug09) Ambient Average Concentration (min-max) TP (mg L -1 ) PO4 (mg L -1 ) TN (mg L -1 ) NOx (mg L -1 ) TSS (mg L -1 ) Inflow 0.37 (0.11-0.89) 0.15 (0.05-0.50) 1.70 (0.44-7.45) 0.70 (0.14-6.00) 8.78 (3.50-24.00) Pond Outflow 0.28 (0.05-0.73) 0.15 (0-0.56) 1.33 (0.69-3.50) 0.14 (0-1.83) 17.90 (5.30-78.50) Wetland Outflow 0.21 (0.05-0.74) 0.16 (0-0.72) 0.92 (0.67-1.25) 0.01 (0-0.04) 2.72 (0.50-6.70) Average Percent Reduction in Concentration TP PO4 TN NOx TSS Inflow vs. Wetland Outflow 42% -10% 46% 98% 69% DRAFT-Edgefield RST Water Quality Summary, December 2009 32
Table 4. 2008 to 2009 Average storm event concentration. Total Nitrogen (mg L -1 ) Total Phosphorus (mg L -1 ) Total Suspended Solids (mg L -1 ) Month Inflow TN Pond Out TN Wetl Out TN Inflow TP Pond Out TP Wetl Out TP Inflow TSS Pond Out TSS Wetl Out TSS *Jun-08 9.96 no data no data 6.10 no data no data 227.00 no data no data *Jul-08 5.15 1.82 1.58 4.78 0.32 0.05 194.00 6.43 4.50 *Aug-08 3.19 1.79 1.32 3.96 0.75 0.05 127.00 13.44 7.00 *Sep-08 2.26 1.84 1.30 1.68 1.04 0.45 53.00 16.70 3.80 Oct-08 no data no data 1.33 no data no data 0.38 63.00 no data 4.00 Nov-08 2.23 no data 0.96 1.72 no data 0.07 no data no data 2.48 Dec-08 no data no data 1.43 no data no data 0.08 no data no data 2.74 Jan-09 6.63 2.55 0.73 2.32 0.18 0.12 119.29 14.73 1.66 Feb-09 8.22 3.39 1.06 3.40 0.13 0.09 146.00 17.10 3.66 Apr-09 5.48 no data 0.76 1.48 no data 0.15 128.12 no data 4.12 May-09 no data no data 0.85 2.26 no data 0.21 80.32 no data 3.59 Jun-09 3.96 no data 0.95 3.43 no data 0.49 204.43 no data 1.50 Jul-09 no data 1.67 1.44 1.64 0.55 0.36 71.43 15.70 4.22 Aug-09 3.64 4.43 0.91 4.16 0.64 0.53 142.68 23.81 3.19 Sep-09 1.93 1.78 0.88 1.30 0.86 0.57 44.74 19.57 2.32 2008-09 Average 4.79 2.41 1.11 2.94 0.56 0.26 123.15 15.94 3.48 2008-09 % Reduction 77% 91% 97% DRAFT-Edgefield RST Water Quality Summary, December 2009 33