From HITSP to HL7 EHR System Function and Information Model (EHR-S FIM) Release 3.0 Interoperability Specifications a Ten Year Journey



Similar documents
EHR System Function and Information Model (EHR-S FIM) Release 2.1 HL7 Project ID# 688

HL7 EHR System Functional Model and Standard (ISO/HL ), Release 2

ISO/HL EHR System Functional Model Standard

MFI 4 Extended Registry SC32/WG2

HL7 and Meaningful Use

Public Health Reporting Initiative Functional Requirements Description

Demonstrating Meaningful Use of EHRs: The top 10 compliance challenges for Stage 1 and what s new with 2

Meaningful Use. Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

New York ehealth Collaborative. Health Information Exchange and Interoperability April 2012

Workflow Redesign Templates

Implementing Consolidated-Clinical Document Architecture (C-CDA) for Meaningful Use Stage 2. ONC Implementation and Testing Division April 5, 2013

Meaningful Use and Lab Related Requirements

Contact Information: West Texas Health Information Technology Regional Extension Center th Street MS 6232 Lubbock, Texas

The Continuity of Care Document. Changing the Landscape of Healthcare Information Exchange

Clinical Document Exchange Integration Guide - Outbound

TABLE 4: STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE OBJECTIVES AND ASSOCIATED MEASURES SORTED BY CORE AND MENU SET

Of EHRs and Meaningful Use. Pat Wise, RN, MA, MS FHIMSS COL (USA ret d) VP, Healthcare Information Systems, HIMSS

Setting the World on FHIR

Enabling Patients Decision Making Power: A Meaningful Use Outcome. Lindsey Mongold, MHA HIT Practice Advisor Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality

HL7 EHR-System for a Pharmacist/ Pharmacy Electronic Health Record Implementation Guide for Community Practice

EHR Incentive Program Stage 3 Objectives & Measures Crosswalk of Stage 3 Proposed Objectives, Measures & Corresponding Stage 2 Measures

Achieving Meaningful Use with Centricity EMR

Guide To Meaningful Use

Overview of MU Stage 2 Joel White, Health IT Now

MicroMD EMR version 7.6

EMR Technology Checklist

Achieving Meaningful Use Training Manual

HIE Ready 2.0 SPECIFICATIONS MATRIX. Product Name: Version Number: Preferred Message and Trigger

MemorialCare Health System: Steven Beal, VP Information Services

Meaningful Use Updates Stage 2 and 3. Julia Moore, Business Analyst SMC Partners, LLC July 8, 2015

Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Professionals Last Updated: August, 2012

Relationship of HL7 EHR System Draft Standard to X12N

MICROMD EMR VERSION OBJECTIVE MEASURE CALCULATIONS

Open Platform. Clinical Portal. Provider Mobile. Orion Health. Rhapsody Integration Engine. RAD LAB PAYER Rx

Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison for Eligible Professionals

North Shore LIJ Health System, Inc. Facility Name

Webinar #1 Meaningful Use: Stage 1 & 2 Comparison CPS 12 & UDS 2013

Care360 EHR Frequently Asked Questions

Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Hospitals and CAHs Last Updated: August, 2012

Agenda. What is Meaningful Use? Stage 2 - Meaningful Use Core Set. Stage 2 - Menu Set. Clinical Quality Measures (CQM) Clinical Considerations

The Future of Meaningful Use

MEETING MEANINGFUL USE IN MICROMD -STAGE TWO- Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist

Private Circulation Document: IST/35_07_0075

South Carolina Health Information Exchange (SCHIEx)

Health Level Seven Records Management & Evidentiary Support (RM-ES) Supporting Clinical Documentation for Legal and Billing Purposes

By the End of This Lesson, You Will Be Able to How Does Secure Messaging Work? What Does The Patient Portal Look Like?...

Meaningful Use - HL7 Version 2

EMR Name/ Model. Cerner PowerChart Ambulatory (PowerWorks ASP)

STAGES 1 AND 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRs 1

ELECTRONIC MEDICAL AND DENTAL RECORD INTEGRATION OPTIONS

Expanded Support for Medicaid Health Information Exchanges

Meaningful Use - HL7 Version 2

Practice Management & Electronic Health Record Systems: School-Based Health Center Requirements & Configuration Considerations.

Beacon User Stories Version 1.0

Understanding Meaningful Use Stage 2

Meaningful Use of Certified EHR Technology with My Vision Express*

FHIM Model Content Overview

Navigating the Trends in Health Care Today. MEDITECH Solutions for Meaningful Use and Interoperability

Summary of the Final Rule for Meaningful Use for 2015 and Meaningful Use Objectives for 2015 and 2016

EMR Name/ Model. meridianemr 4.2 CCHIT 2011 certified

uently Asked NextGen Questions Share Frequently Asked uently Asked Questions Frequently Asked FAQ Pre-General Release (April-June 2014)

HL7 Personal Health Record System Functional Model and Standard & Industry Update

Stage 1 Meaningful Use - Attestation Worksheet: Core Measures

THE STIMULUS AND STANDARDS. John D. Halamka MD

Health Care February 28, CMS Issues Proposed Rule on Stage 2 Meaningful Use,

Eligible Professionals please see the document: MEDITECH Prepares You for Stage 2 of Meaningful Use: Eligible Professionals.

Planning for Health Information Technology and Exchange in Public Health

Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible Hospitals and Eligible Professionals (EPs)

HIMSS Interoperability Showcase 2011

Sample Assignment 1: Workflow Analysis Directions

Reporting Period: For Stage 2, the reporting period must be the entire Federal Fiscal Year.

Stage 2 Eligible Professional Meaningful Use Core Measures Measure 15 of 17 Last Updated: August, 2015

Interoperability: White Paper. Introduction. PointClickCare Interoperability January 2014

HL7 & Meaningful Use. Charles Jaffe, MD, PhD CEO Health Level Seven International. HIMSS 11 Orlando February 23, 2011

7CHAPTER EXAMINATION/ ASSESSMENT NOTES, GRAPHICS, AND CHARTS

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Certification: A Guide for EHR Product Managers

Core Set of Objectives and Measures Must Meet All 15 Measures Stage 1 Objectives Stage 1 Measures Reporting Method

Transcription:

From HITSP to HL7 EHR System Function and Information Model (EHR-S FIM) Release 3.0 Interoperability Specifications a Ten Year Journey Gary.Dickinson@ehr-standards.com, EHR WG Co-Chair Nancy.Orvis@tma.osd.mil DoD MHS proponent Shufnagel@tiag.net, EHR WG facilitator NIST Presentation, June 11, 2013 6/13/2013 1

6/13/2013 DRAFT WORKING DOCUMENT 3

HL7 EHR-S FM The HL7 International EHR System Functional Model (EHR-S FM) outlines important features and functions that should be contained in an EHR system. Through the creation of functional profiles, this model provides a standard description and common understanding of functions for healthcare settings. To date, HL7 has developed or is developing profiles for areas such as child health, emergency care, long term care, behavioral health and vital statistic reporting. US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) along with its accredited certification bodies (ACB) use EHR functional profiles such as the CRFP as a basis for certifying EHR systems. The EHR-S FM is the original product of the HL7 EHR Work Group that was created in 2000 at the request of the National Health Information Infrastructure (NHII) (now know as the office of the National Coordinator (ONC)). 6/13/2013 DRAFT WORKING DOCUMENT 4

Executive-Summary HITSP Stared Doing Interoperability Specifications in 2005 The release of the EHR System Functional Model (EHR-S FM) Release 3 is targeted for 2015; where, it will become EHR-S Function-and-Information Reference-Architecture Release 3.0 (EHR-S FIM RA-3.0), which builds upon and incorporates lessons learned from the EHR-S FM 2008 Release 1.1 and 2013 Release 2.0; and where, the EHR-S FIM RA-3.0 is intended to facilitate pragmatic domainspecific tool-based, acquisition, development, implementation, test-and-certification requirements-specification for EHR capabilities-and-systems. A 2015 US-domain Meaningful Use (MU) Profile will be developed to demonstrate the EHR-S FIM RA-3.0 s utility. 6/13/2013 DRAFT WORKING DOCUMENT 5

HL7 EHR WG Tooling Vision Using Sparx Enterprise Architect Proposed methodology and tools to support the development of EHR Interoperability Specifications. End-to-End lifecycle Scope Use Case, mapped to EHR System Functions, mapped to Information Exchanges (IEs), mapped to Information Model mapped it Interoperability Specifications, mapped to Standard IE content and transport 6/13/2013 DRAFT WORKING DOCUMENT 6

EHR-S FIM Tool Components Use Case S&I Framework s Use Case Simplification Reusable Actors, Systems, Roles Reusable Scenario Event Steps Reusable Actions Reusable Requirements Reusable Data Objects and Data Elements Context Constraints 6/13/2013 DRAFT WORKING DOCUMENT 7

EHR-FIM Tool Components EHR-S Functional Model R 2.0 The 2006 EHR-S FM had approximately 130 functions with 1000 conformance criteria. The 2013 EHR-S FM R2 has over 320 functions with 2300 conformance criteria. 6/13/2013 DRAFT WORKING DOCUMENT 8

EHR-FM Tool Components HL7 Fast Healthcare Information Resources (FHIR) HITSP C32 Continuity of Care Document (CCD) had 16 Data Modules FHIR will have approximately 150 data modules FHIR defines a set of granular clinical concepts. The resources can be managed in isolation, or aggregated into complex documents. Technically, FHIR is designed for the web; the resources are based on simple XML, with an http-based RESTful protocol where each resource has predictable URL. 6/13/2013 DRAFT WORKING DOCUMENT 9

EHR-S FIM Tool Impact NIST s EHR Tooling Strategy 6/13/2013 DRAFT WORKING DOCUMENT 10

EXAMPLE: CP.4 Manage Orders Description / Scenario Statement: Provide the ability to manage clinical orders and results including medication, nonmedication, diagnostic tests, blood products, other biologics and referrals, using order sets as appropriate. Description: The provision of clinical care includes the need to order from a variety of treatments using order sets as appropriate as well as reviewing the results of treatment. Orders for treatments may include medications, non-medication therapies (e.g. physical therapy, special diet, immunizations, non-allopathic regimens); diagnostic care (e.g., laboratory, radiology); blood products and other biologics (e.g., blood transfusions, human growth hormones). Patients are often referred to other health care providers for more specialized diagnostic workup and/or treatment. An effective EHR-S must include support and management of these processes and associated documentation. Example: (notional scenario based on conformance criteria) During an encounter, patient problems, previous treatments, care plans and results are reviewed; then, orders or order-sets, based-on accepted clinical practices and/or order set templates, may be created by the clinician. If an order or order-set is created, discrete data elements associated with the order(s) are recorded and any appropriate order related or patient-related information is noted. Patient orders and/or order-sets are reported-to or coordinated with appropriate sources, appropriate clinicians and organizations (e.g., PHRs, schools, registries, public health), according to scope of practice, organizational policy and/or jurisdictional law. 6/13/2013 11 RED: Recommended deletion, Blue: Recommended Insertion

EXAMPLE: CP.4 Manage Orders EHR-S Components Dependent-on Clinician-Activities act CP.4 Manage Orders NOTE: EHR-S FIM is NOT intended to imply a specific architecture or workflow! Manage Records Manage Trusts Manage Business Rules Encounter EHR-S Components Clinician Activities Start Schedule Orders Schedule Manage Schedules Event Manage Events Administrative Information Patient Information Clinical Information CP.4 Manage Orders Manage Terminology Terminology Manage Lists List Order Set Order Manage Documents & Notes Document or Note is-a End Clinical Document or Note 6/13/2013 RED: Recommend deletion, Blue: Recommended Insertion 12

EXAMPLE: CP.4 Manage Orders Conceptual Information Model (CIM) 6/13/2013 DRAFT WORKING DOCUMENT 13 class CP.4 CIM Manage Orders ISSUE: data associated with CDS EHR-S CP, CPS & AS Document or Note List Registry Clinical Document or Note Order for Diagnostic Test Order for Non-medication Order Encounter Event Order Set Schedule Report Order for Referral Orders for Blood Products and Other Biologics Patient Information Orders Schedule Order for Medication Terminology Clinical Information Administrative Information Trust Infrastructure Record Infrastructure

class CP.4 Manage Orders (attributes) EXAMPLE: CP.4. Manage Orders Conformance Criteria (CC) Applicable to this CDM SHALL CCs have bolded borders. CP.4#10 Event + date & time (occurence) - change justification - circumstances - Clinical Information - date (entry) - date (review) - description - duration - information reviewed - information source - information validator - location - mechanism - metadata - person-role - status - trigger - type + deactivate() + justify() + manage() Order-Execution-Time Enumeration - admission - discharge - post-operative - conditional - standing Order Lifecycle Stage Enumeration - new - cancellation - modification - renewal - discontinuation - conditional - other CP.4#03 CP.4#19 CP.4#21 CP.4#06 CP.4#27 Order - annotation - comments & instructions (free text) - demographic information - indication/justification - order activation date & time - order set tag - oral verification :boolean - ordering clinician - Order Execution Time - Order Lifecycle Stage - Order Type - problem/diagnosis - patient name - patient identification number - patient DOB or age - patient instructions - problem/diagnosis code link - problem/diagnosis code or description - Signature - status - supporting documentation - usgency status - user-created instructions or system prompts + manage() CP.4#11 CP.4#12 CP.4#15 CP.4#02 CP.4#26 CP.4#24 CP.4#07 CP.4#09 CP.4#08 CP.4#22 Order Type Enumeration - diagnostic test - non-medication - medication - blood product & biologics - referral CP.4#01 CP.4#04 CP.4#13 CP.4#20 CP.4#18 CP.4#14 CP.4#25 6/13/2013 DRAFT WORKING DOCUMENT 14 CP.4#05 CP.4#17 CP.4#23 CP.4#16 CP.4#28 CPS.8.4 Support for Communications Between Provider and Patient and/or the Patient Representative

EXAMPLE: CP.4 Manage Orders Conformance Criteria (CC) Applicable to this CDM 1. CP.4#01 The system SHALL provide the ability to manage role-based, context-based and/or userbased order entry. (add reference TI role based function or remove here) 2. CP.4#02 The system SHALL provide the ability to manage the order lifecycle creation, renewal, modification and discontinuation, etc. of orders. 3. CP.4#03 The system SHALL provide the ability to render relevant, relevant patient-specific laboratory test results when entering an order. 4. CP.4#04 The system SHALL provide the ability to manage the status of an order (e.g. open, completed, in process). (harmonize with CP.4.2) 5. CP.4#05 The system MAY provide the ability to capture, maintain and render order entry with an appropriate registration process when the identity of the patient is unknown or in an urgent situation. 6. CP.4#06 The system SHOULD provide the ability to manage standing orders or orders that may be submitted by providers other than licensed providers according to scope of practice, organizational policy and/or jurisdictional law. (standing order = pre-established conditional set of order = CPS 4.1, CPS.4.1 CC#4, CC#11) Verbal orders? 7. CP.4#07 The system SHALL provide the ability to capture and render problem/diagnosis as a required element of an order. 8. CP.4#08 The system MAY provide the ability to capture, maintain and render, as discrete data, a diagnosis/problem code and/or description associated with an order of any type (including prescriptions and medications ordered for administration). 6/13/2013 NOTE: EHR-S FIM is NOT DRAFT intended WORKING to imply DOCUMENT a specific architecture or workflow! 15

EXAMPLE: CP.4 Manage Orders Conformance Criteria (CC) Applicable to this CDM 9. CP.4#09 The system MAY provide the ability to link an order of any type (including medication order) with a related clinical problem(s) and/or diagnosis code(s) and description. 10. CP.4#10 The system SHALL provide the ability to annotate and render comments and instructions with an order. {same as CC11?) 11. CP.4#11 The system SHOULD provide the ability to annotate and render free text comments and instructions with an order. (same as CC10? ) 12. CP.4#12 The system SHOULD provide the ability to tag frequently used and institutionally-approved order sets as favorites or preferences to facilitate retrieval and ordering. 13. CP.4#13 The system MAY provide the ability to manage orders submitted to or received from external organizations and/or facilities such as Health Information Exchanges (HIE) or regional Electronic Health Record Systems (EHR-S). 14. CP.4#14 The system SHALL render the patient name, identification number, and age or date of birth on all order screens. 15. CP.4#15 The system SHALL provide the ability to capture, maintain and render an indicator of oral verification ("read-back") of the complete order by the person receiving the telephone or verbal order. 16. CP.4#16 The system SHALL provide the ability to capture and render the urgency status (e.g., As- Soon-As-Possible or STAT) associated with an order. 17. CP.4#17 The system SHOULD provide the ability to render order history for any order, including the ordering clinician, order details, date, and time. 18. CP.4#18 The system SHOULD provide the ability to tag and render a field as required for a complete order by order type. 6/13/2013 NOTE: EHR-S FIM is NOT DRAFT intended WORKING to imply DOCUMENT a specific architecture or workflow! 16

EXAMPLE: CP.4 Manage Orders Conformance Criteria (CC) Applicable to this CDM 19. CP.4#19 The system SHOULD provide the ability to tag orders to be activated at a future date and time including admission orders, discharge orders, and post-operative orders. 20. CP.4#20 The system SHOULD provide the ability to render orders for all order types. 21. CP.4#21 The system MAY provide the ability to manage conditional orders that can be activated when certain criteria and conditions are met. 22. CP.4#22 The system SHOULD provide the ability to capture, store and render the identity of all providers who signed an order. 23. CP.4#23 The system SHOULD provide the ability to render a list of active orders for a patient. 24. CP.4#24 The system SHOULD provide the ability to render a list of orders by similar or comparable type (e.g., all radiology or all laboratory orders). 25. CP.4#25 The system SHOULD provide the ability to render a list of outstanding orders for multiple patients (as opposed to outstanding orders for a single patient). 26. CP.4#26 The system SHOULD provide the ability to capture the provider's order-cancellation request. 27. CP.4#27 The system SHOULD provide the ability to transmit an order-cancellation request. 28. CP.4#28 The system SHALL conform to function CPS.8.4 (Support for Communication between Provider and Patient and/or the Patient Representative) to manage information regarding orders. 6/13/2013 NOTE: EHR-S FIM is NOT DRAFT intended WORKING to imply DOCUMENT a specific architecture or workflow! 17

6/13/2013 DRAFT WORKING DOCUMENT 18