ISO/HL EHR System Functional Model Standard
|
|
|
- Darcy Higgins
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ISO/HL EHR System Functional Model Standard Presented by: Gary Dickinson Director, Healthcare Standards CentriHealth Co-Chair, HL7 EHR Work Group Lead, S&I Framework Cross-Initiative Simplification Work Group Ambassador Briefing March 2013
2 The Drivers International Focus on -EHR System Functionality -EHR System(/Record) Interoperability Concerns about privacy/security, cost, quality, operational efficiency and data/record integrity By many stakeholders Healthcare providers Consumers Government Employers
3 The Need Complete patient health record, trusted record management Starting at: Point of service, point of care, Point of EHR record entry (origination) Continuing to: All subsequent points of EHR record access and use
4 EHRS FM within HL7 Family Health Level Seven (HL7) is an ANSI-Accredited international Standards Development Organization (SDO) The term HL7 is often used synonymously for the HL7 organization and the HL7 messaging standard HL7 standards have multiple foci: 1. Healthcare-related data/information/routing Standards: Messaging Standards (V2.x and V3) Document Standards (CDA) 2. Healthcare-related Functional Standards (EHR-S FM) 3. Other Standards (Mobile Health, CCOW, Vocabulary, Security, Healthcare Devices ) HL7 2012
5 How It Started Request from US Government April, 2003: CMS asked Institutes of Medicine (IOM) for guidance on care delivery functions IOM & HL7 to coordinate development of a functional model for an EHR system, not a transaction standard Need: Pay for performance Sponsors: HHS ASPE, VA, HIMSS, RWJ Foundation April, 2003: HL7 EHR WG began work on EHR-S FM July, 2004: Approved as a draft standard for trial use (DSTU)
6 From DSTU to ANSI/ISO/CEN February 2007: Release 1.0 approved as a fully American National Standards Institute (ANSI) accredited standard November 2009: Release 1.1 approved as a International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standard Three way joint ballot between: HL7, ISO TC215, CEN TC251 April 2013: Release 2.0 continues 2 nd round ballot as normative international standard Six way joint ballot between: HL7, ISO TC215, CEN TC251, IHTSDO, CDISC and GS1.
7 EHR EHR vs. EHR-S The underlying single, logical patient record The data objects and elements comprising the record Serving as the record of care for clinical, operations/business legal and disclosure purposes EHR-S Software that provides functionality to: Manage and maintain the record Accomplish the various clinical, business, research and other purposes of the EHR record May be single monolithic system or a system of systems
8 EHR System Functional Model Is Not A messaging specification An EHR design specification An implementation specification (not the how ) Does not prescribe technology Does not dictate how functions must be implemented (e.g., via the user interface, database design) Is A system specification An EHR system specification A reference list of functions that may be present in an EHR-S (the what and why ) Enables consistent expression of functionality Provides flexibility for innovation and product differentiation Gold standard, sensitive to what can practically be done by a system, future system development
9 Standards Plus Strategy Meets applicable certification criteria Capabilities beyond certification criteria could be specified by the EHR-S FM
10 Functional Model Scope Defines a standardized model of the functions that may be present in EHR Systems. Makes no distinction regarding implementation. Does not address whether the EHR-S is a system-ofsystems or a single system providing the functions required by the users. Makes no statement about which technology is used.
11 EHR System Functional Model Enables consistent expression of functionality Provides a reference list of functions that: May be present in an EHR-S Understandable from a user s perspective Conformance criteria Required criteria: Mandatory (SHALL) Optional criteria: Two levels (SHOULD, MAY)
12 EHR System Functional Profiles The EHR-S FM R.1.1 contains approx. 160 functions and 1000 conformance criteria across 3 sections HL7 EHR System Functional Model Functional Profiles (Care Setting) Ancillary Profiles (Specific Purpose) Functional and ancillary profiles are subsets derived from the FM. EHR systems conform to profiles. Emergency Long Term and Post Acute Care Behavioral Health Child Health Records Management & Evidentiary Support (RM-ES) Vital Records Clinical Research
13 Functional Model Conformance EHR System Functional Model (EHR-S FM) Child Health FP RM&ES FP Derived FP 1 Child Health Conforms to RM&ES Derived FP 2 DC 1.1, CC 3. SHALL DC 1.1, CC 4 SHOULD To develop a robust, yet flexible FM Country 1 DC 1.1, CC3: SHALL DC 1.1, CC4: SHOULD Country 2 LTPAC FP DC 1.1, CC 3: SHALL DC 1.1, CC 4: SHOULD LTPAC FP DC 1.1, CC 3: SHALL DC 1.1, CC 4: SHALL C 2 LTPAC FP LTPAC Conforms to RM&ES Child Health FP DC 1.1, CC 3: SHALL DC 1.1, CC 4: SHALL DC 1.1, CC 3: SHALL DC 1.1, CC 4: SHALL Derived FP 1
14 Additional Functional Profiles US Meaningful Use/EHR Incentive Program (new) EHR System Usability (pending) Dietetics/Food & Nutrition (jointly with ADA) Public Health (jointly with CDC) E-Prescribing (jointly with NCPDP) Pharmacist/Pharmacy (jointly with NCPDP) Dentistry (jointly with ADA)
15 Functional Model & Certification Function ID 1.0 HL7 EHR-S Standard Function Product Certification Conformance Criteria Certification Year Certification Criteria No. Clause ABC 1 SHALL.. SHALL.. X 2 SHOULD.. SHALL.. X 3 SHALL.. SHALL.. X 4 MAY.....(Did not adopt) 5 SHOULD.. SHALL.. X 6 SHALL.. SHALL.. X Granularity: Individual conformance criterion may be certified in a year different from other criteria in the same function Dependent on essential now vs. future, market availability, & priority for improving quality of care
16 EHR-S Functional Model at a Glance EHR System Functional Model Functions describe the behavior of a system in useroriented language so as to be recognizable to the key stakeholders of an EHR System This represents the Release 1.1 Structure
17 Structure of the Functional Model ID# Name Statement/Description See Also Conformance Criteria DC Identify and Maintain a Patient Record Statement: Identify and maintain a single patient record for each patient. Description: A single record is needed for legal purposes, as well as to organize it unambiguously for the provider. Health information is captured and linked to the patient record. Static data elements as well as data elements that will change over time are maintained. The patient is uniquely identified, after which the record is tied to that patient. Combining information on the same patient, or separating information where it was inadvertently captured for the wrong patient, helps maintain health information for a single patient. In the process of creating a patient record, it is at times advantageous to replicate identical information across multiple records, so that such data does not have to be reentered. For example, when a parent registers children as new patients, the address, guarantor, and insurance data may be propagated in the children s records without having to re-enter them. S S S S IN.2.1 IN The system SHALL create a single logical record for each patient. 2. The system SHALL provide the ability to create a record for a patient when the identity of the patient is unknown. 3. The system SHALL provide the ability to store more than one identifier for each patient record. 4. The system SHALL associate key identifier information (e.g., system ID, medical record number) with each patient record. 5. The system SHALL provide the ability to uniquely identify a patient and tie the record to a single patient. 6. The system SHALL provide the ability, through a controlled method, to merge or link dispersed information for an individual patient upon recognizing the identity of the patient. 7. IF health information has been mistakenly associated with a patient, THEN the system SHALL provide the ability to mark the information as erroneous in the record of the patient in which it was mistakenly associated and represent that information as erroneous in all outputs containing that information.
18 Inputs to Release 2.0 (R2). Vital Reports Records Mgmt Behavioral Long-Term Care Alignment Lifecycle Interop Model. Provider Based PHR-S FM & Profiles SOA SAIF R1.1 Adjustments, Enhancements EHR-S Profiles EHR-S FM Release 2.0 Privacy, Security, Confidentiality Other Industry Initiatives Certification (CCHIT, Q-Rec) Health Info Exchange Data Use Fraud Mgt Quality Rev Cycle International Stds (ISO TC215, ISO 20514, 18307, 18308, 13606, Others
19 R1.1 R2 Chapter Reorganization Direct Care (DC) Supportive (S) Information Infrastructure (IN) Care Provision Support (CP) Overarching (O) Care Provision (CP) Population Health Support (POP) Record Infrastructure (RI) Trust Infrastructure (TI) Administrative Support (AS)
20 Extension of Functions/Criteria HL7 EHR-S Functional Model, Release 2 Summary Breakdown of Functions and Conformance Criteria Release 1 Release 1.1 Chapter Functions Conformance Criteria OV Overarching Criteria 2 33 CP Care Provision CPS Care Provision Support POP Population Health Support AS Administration Support RI Records Infrastructure TI Trust Infrastructure Conformance Criteria Conformance Criteria TOTALS: 322 2,
21 Care Provision Focus on functions required to provide care to a specific patient and enable hands-on delivery of healthcare Organized in general order of an encounter Care Provision CP.1 CP.2 CP.3 CP.4 CP.5 CP.6 CP.7 CP.8 CP.9 Manage Clinical History Render Externally-sourced Information CP.1 CP.1.1 Manage Clinical Documentation Manage Orders CP.1.2 Manage Results CP.1.3 Manage Treatment Administration CP.1.4 CP.1.5 Manage Future Care CP.1.6 Manage Patient Education & Communication Manage Care Coordination & Reporting CP.1.7 CP.1.8 Example child functions: Manage Clinical History Manage Patient History Manage Allergy, Intolerance and Adverse Reaction List Manage Medication List Manage Problem List Manage Strengths List Manage Immunization List Manage Medical Equipment, Prosthetic/Orthotic, Device List Manage Patient and Family Preferences
22 Care Provision Support Focus on functions required to support the provision of care to a specific patient to enable hands-on delivery of healthcare Organized to align with Care Provision chapter Care Provision Support CPS.1 CPS.2 CPS.3 CPS.4 CPS.5 CPS.6 CPS.7 CPS.8 CPS.9 Example child functions: Record Management Support Externally-sourced CPS.4 Information Support Orders Support Clinical Documentation CPS.4.1 Manage Order Set Templates Support Orders CPS.4.2 Support Medication & Immunization Orders CPS Support for Medication Interaction & Allergy Checking Support Results CPS Support for Patient Specific Dosing and Warnings Support Treatment Administration CPS Support for Medication Ordering Efficiencies Support Future Care CPS Support for Medication Recommendations Support Patient Education & CPS.4.3 Communication Support for Non-Medication Ordering Support Care Coordination CPS.4.4 & Reporting Support Orders for Diagnostic Tests CPS.4.5 Support Orders for Blood Products and Other Biologics
23 Population Health Support Population Health Support POP.1 Focus Support on input for Health to systems Maintenance, that Preventive perform Care and medical Wellness research, promote POP.2 public Support health, for Epidemiological & improve Investigations the quality of Clinical of care Health at a Within multi-patient a Population level POP.3 POP.4 POP.5 POP.6 POP.7 POP.8 POP.9 POP.10 Example child functions: Support for Notification and Response Support for Monitoring Response Notifications Regarding a Specific Patient s Health Donor Management Support Measurement, Analysis, Research and Reports Public Health Related Updates De-Identified Data Request Management Support Consistent Healthcare Management of Patient Groups or Populations Manage Population Health Study-Related Identifiers POP.6 POP.6.1 POP.6.2 POP.6.3 POP.6.4 Measurement, Analysis, Research and Reports Outcome Measures and Analysis Performance and Accountability Measures Support for Process Improvement Support for Care System Performance Indicators (Dashboards)
24 Administrative Support Administration support AS.1 Manage Provider Information AS.2 Manage Patient Demographics, Location and Synchronization AS.3 Manage Personal Health Record Interaction AS.4 Manage Communication AS.5 Manage Clinical Workflow Tasking AS.6 Manage Resource Availability AS.7 Manage Encounter/Episode of Care Management AS.1 Manage Provider Information AS.8 Manage Information Access for Supplemental AS.1.1 Use Manage Provider Registry or Directory AS.9 Manage Administrative Transaction Processing AS.1.2 Manage Provider's Location Within Facility AS.1.3 Provider's On Call Location Example child functions: AS.1.4 Manage Provider's Location(s) or Office(s) AS.1.5 Team/Group of Providers Registry or Directory AS.1.6 Provider Caseload/Panel AS.1.7 Manage Practitioner/Patient Relationships
25 Record Infrastructure Focus on records, record entries and record management, including R1.1 functions/criteria and key provisions of the RM-ES Functional Profile, EHR Interoperability and Lifecycle Model DSTUs. Record Infrastructure RI.1 RI.2 RI.3 Record Lifecycle and Lifespan Record Synchronization Record Archive and Restore RI.1.1 RI RI RI Record Lifecycle Originate and Retain Record Entry Amend Record Entry Content Translate Record Entry Content RI Attest Record Entry Content RI View/Access Record Entry Content Example child functions: RI RI RI Transmit and/or Disclose Record Entries Receive and Retain Record Entries De-identify Record Entries RI Pseudomynize Record Entries RI Re-identify Record Entries RI Extract Record Entry Content
26 Trust Infrastructure Contains the remaining Release 1.1 Infrastructure functions, including Audit. Trust Infrastructure TI.1 TI.2 TI.3 TI.4 TI.5 TI.6 TI.7 TI.8 TI.9 Security Audit Registry and Directory Services Standard Terminology and Terminology Services TI.1 Security Standards-Based Interoperability TI.1.1 Entity Authentication Business Rules Management TI.1.2 Entity Authorization Workflow Management TI.1.3 Entity Access Control Database Backup and Recovery TI.1.4 Patient Access Management TI.1.5 Non-Repudiation System Management Operations and Performance TI.1.6 Secure Data Exchange TI.1.7 Secure Data Routing Example child functions: TI.1.8 Information Attestation TI.1.9 Patient Privacy and Confidentiality
27 Next Steps Update R1.1 functional profiles to R2 Create new realm (country)-based profiles Map Functional Model to HL7 messages, documents, data Development of Release 3 Function and Information Model
28 Want to Know More? Join HL7 Review the HL7 web site Subscribe to HL7 EHR WG list serve Join a Sub-Group: PHR, RM-ES, Interop Join a Functional Profile Team Join our Tuesday Work Group calls 3:00-4:30 PM Eastern
29 HL7 EHR System Functional Model and Standard Q & A
HL7 EHR System Functional Model and Standard (ISO/HL7 10781), Release 2
HL7 EHR System Functional Model and Standard (ISO/HL7 10781), Release 2 Health Information Management Systems Society (HIMSS) Las Vegas, NV 20 Feb 2012 Presented by: Mark G. Janczewski, MD, MPH Deloitte
HL7 EHR System Functional Model and Standard
HL7 EHR System Functional Model and Standard Presented by: Donald T. Mon, PhD Vice President, Practice Leadership American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA) Co-Chair, HL7 EHR WG HIMSS Annual
HL7 Electronic Health Record System (EHR-S) Functional Model and Standard
HL7 Electronic Health Record System (EHR-S) Functional Model and Standard Ambassador Briefing Gary Dickinson Co-Chair, HL7 EHR WG [email protected] 2002-2009 Health Level Seven, Inc. All
Health Level Seven Records Management & Evidentiary Support (RM-ES) Supporting Clinical Documentation for Legal and Billing Purposes
Health Level Seven Records Management & Evidentiary Support (RM-ES) Supporting Clinical Documentation for Legal and Billing Purposes HIT Policy Committee Meaningful Use WG/Certification & Adoption WG Public
HL7 EHR-System for a Pharmacist/ Pharmacy Electronic Health Record Implementation Guide for Community Practice
HL7 EHR-System for a Pharmacist/ Pharmacy Electronic Health Record Implementation Guide for Community Practice Table of Contents HL7 EHR-System for a Pharmacist/Pharmacy Electronic Health Record Implementation
HL7 PHR System Functional Model
HL7 PHR System Functional Model Presented by: Donald T. Mon, PhD Co-Chair, EHR Work Group HIMSS, 2013 2013 Health Level Seven International. All Rights Reserved. HL7 and Health Level Seven are registered
Private Circulation Document: IST/35_07_0075
Private Circulation Document: IST/3_07_007 BSI Group Headquarters 389 Chiswick High Road London W4 4AL Tel: +44 (0) 20 8996 9000 Fax: +44 (0) 20 8996 7400 www.bsi-global.com Committee Ref: IST/3 Date:
HL7 EHR-S Records Management & Evidentiary Support Functional Profile
HL7 EHR-S Records Management & Evidentiary Support Functional Profile Michelle Dougherty, RHIA, CHP HIT Standards AHIMA for the Legal EHR [email protected] An educational update to the HIMSS
HL7 Personal Health Record System Functional Model and Standard & Industry Update
HL7 Personal Health Record System Functional Model and Standard & Industry Update Presented by: R. Lenel James, CPHIT, CPEHR HL7 Co-Lead, EHR WG, Publishing HL7 Co-Lead, PHR WG, Conformance HIMSS, Member
Relationship of HL7 EHR System Draft Standard to X12N
Relationship of HL7 EHR System Draft Standard to X12N EHR Technical Committee Co-Chairs: Gary Dickinson Linda Fischetti Sam Heard Excerpt of EHR-S DSTU Class Overview of Discussion Background Where We
From HITSP to HL7 EHR System Function and Information Model (EHR-S FIM) Release 3.0 Interoperability Specifications a Ten Year Journey
From HITSP to HL7 EHR System Function and Information Model (EHR-S FIM) Release 3.0 Interoperability Specifications a Ten Year Journey [email protected], EHR WG Co-Chair [email protected]
This document is a preview generated by EVS
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 10781 Second edition 2015-08-01 Health Informatics HL7 Electronic Health Records-System Functional Model, Release 2 (EHR FM) Informatique de santé Modèle fonctionnel d un système
EHR Standards Landscape
EHR Standards Landscape Dr Dipak Kalra Centre for Health Informatics and Multiprofessional Education (CHIME) University College London [email protected] A trans-national ehealth Infostructure Wellness
HL7 and Meaningful Use
HL7 and Meaningful Use HIMSS Las Vegas February 23, 2012 Grant M. Wood Intermountain Healthcare Clinical Genetics Institute Meaningful Use What Does It Mean? HITECH rewards the Meaningful Use of health
Health informatics HL7 Electronic health record system functional model, release 1
DRAFT INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO/HL7 DIS 10781 ISO/TC 215 Voting begins on 2008-04-24 Secretariat: ANSI Voting terminates on 2008-09-24 INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION МЕЖДУНАРОДНАЯ ОРГАНИЗАЦИЯ
Functional Profile Starter Pack based on HL7 EHR System Functional Model Release 2 (EHRS FM) 7 March 2014
Functional Profile Starter Pack based on HL7 EHR System Functional Model Release 2 (EHRS FM) Status HL7 EHR System Functional Model Release 2 Approved for HL7 Publication Release 2.1 awaiting conclusion
Data Provenance. Functional Requirements Document: Developed in Response to the Data Provenance Task Force Recommendations. Version 1.
Data Provenance Functional Requirements Document: Developed in Response to the Data Provenance Task Force Recommendations Version 1.0 May 2015 Version History Version Revision Author Description of Change
HL7 EHR System Functional Model. Draft Standard for Trial Use. July, 2004. Editors:
HL7 EHR System Functional Model Draft Standard for Trial Use July, 2004 Editors: Gary Dickinson EHR Standards Linda Fischetti, RN MS U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Sam Heard, MD Ocean Informatics
Meaningful Use. NextGen Ambulatory EHR Path to. At NextGen Healthcare, we are ready to help. you demonstrate Meaningful Use.
NextGen Ambulatory EHR Path to Meaningful Use At NextGen Healthcare, we are ready to help you demonstrate Meaningful Use. With our award-winning, certified EHR, our commitment to client partnerships, and
HL7 & Meaningful Use. Charles Jaffe, MD, PhD CEO Health Level Seven International. HIMSS 11 Orlando February 23, 2011
HL7 & Meaningful Use Charles Jaffe, MD, PhD CEO Health Level Seven International HIMSS 11 Orlando February 23, 2011 Overview Overview of Meaningful Use HIT Standards and Meaningful Use Overview HL7 Standards
Value Proposition of EHR System Functional Model (EHRS-FM) US-Realm Profile with DoD and VA Sub-Profiles
Value Proposition of EHR System Functional Model (EHRS-FM) US-Realm Profile with DoD and VA Sub-Profiles PREPARED FOR VA MANAGEMENT by Stephen Hufnagel PhD, Tiag subcontractor to Edmond Scientific March
Structured Data Capture (SDC) The Use of Structured Data Capture for Clinical Research
Structured Data Capture (SDC) The Use of Structured Data Capture for Clinical Research July 2015 S&I Initiative Coordinator: Ed Hammond HHS/ONC Sponsor: Farrah Darbouze SDC Overview Launched in 2013 in
Guide To Meaningful Use
Guide To Meaningful Use Volume 1 Collecting the Data Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 CORE SET... 4 1. DEMOGRAPHICS... 5 2. VITAL SIGNS... 6 3. PROBLEM LIST... 8 4. MAINTAIN ACTIVE MEDICATIONS LIST... 9 5. MEDICATION
Meaningful Use HL7 Version 2
Meaningful Use HL7 Version 2 HL7 Version 2 and Immunization Registries, HIMSS 2011, Orlando, FL John Quinn, HL7 CTO February 2011 Attribution of this content In addition to ONC final rules, this presentation
HI-1018: The Electronic Health Record
Course Introduction Course Introduction HI-1018: The Electronic Health Record 6m Chapter 01 - Introduction Introduction History Medical Record History Medical Records Purpose Paper Electronic EMR versus
December 2014. Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program Report on Health Information Technology (HIT) and Transparency
December 2014 Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program Report on Health Information Technology (HIT) and Transparency I. Background Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program Report on Health
Data Integrity in an Era of EHRs, HIEs, and HIPAA: A Health Information Management Perspective
Office for Civil Rights, HHS National Institute for Standards and Technology Conference Safeguarding Health Information: Building Assurance through HIPAA Security Data Integrity in an Era of EHRs, HIEs,
Standardization of the Australian Medical Data Exchange Model. Michael Legg PhD
Standardization of the Australian Medical Data Exchange Model Michael Legg PhD Agenda The National ehealth Program Pathology in Australia Standardisation in Australia Some projects Communication Any meaningful
EHR System Function and Information Model (EHR-S FIM) Release 2.1 HL7 Project ID# 688
EHR System Function and Information Model (EHR-S FIM) Release 2.1 HL7 Project ID# 688 Executive Summary for EHR-S FIM Immunization Capability Prototype [email protected], EHR WG Modeling
FHIM Model Content Overview
FHIM Model Content Overview Federal Health Information Model (FHIM) and Associated Terminology Models Goal Produce a logical, health information model that supports semantic interoperability and that is
Sharing EHR data between NF, MD, & LTC pharmacy using CMS standard messages
Sharing EHR data between NF, MD, & LTC pharmacy using CMS standard messages Christopher Laxton, CAE Shelly Spiro, RPh, FASCP Rod Baird Executive Director Executive Director President AMDA The Society for
Health Care Information System Standards
Health Care Information System Standards 1 Standards Development Process Four Methods (Hammond & Cimino, 2001) Ad hoc no formal adoption process De facto vendor or other has a very large segment of the
Service Functional Models (SFMs) and their relationship to the Electonic Health Record System Functional Model (EHR-S FM)
Service Functional Models (SFMs) and their relationship to the Electonic Health Record System Functional Model (EHR-S FM) EFMI STC interoperability workshop, Reykjavik, June 2010 Dr. Juha Mykkänen University
Health IT Enabled Quality Measurement and Improvement: The HL7 Clinical Quality Information Workgroup
Health IT Enabled Quality Measurement and Improvement: The HL7 Clinical Quality Information Workgroup Walter G. Suarez, MD, MPH Executive Director, Health IT Strategy and Policy Kaiser Permanente Co-Chair,
Eligible Professionals please see the document: MEDITECH Prepares You for Stage 2 of Meaningful Use: Eligible Professionals.
s Preparing for Meaningful Use in 2014 MEDITECH (Updated December 2013) Professionals please see the document: MEDITECH Prepares You for Stage 2 of Meaningful Use: Professionals. Congratulations to our
ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS. Nonfederal Efforts to Help Achieve Health Information Interoperability
United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters September 2015 ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS Nonfederal Efforts to Help Achieve Health Information Interoperability GAO-15-817
Interoperability Testing and Certification. Lisa Carnahan Computer Scientist Standards Coordination Office
Interoperability Testing and Certification Lisa Carnahan Computer Scientist Standards Coordination Office Discussion Topics US National Institute of Standards & Technology American Recovery & Reinvestment
Care360 EHR Frequently Asked Questions
Care360 EHR Frequently Asked Questions Table of Contents Care360 EHR... 4 What is Care360 EHR?... 4 What are the current capabilities of Care 360 EHR?... 4 Is Care 360 EHR an EMR?... 5 Can I have Care360
THE STIMULUS AND STANDARDS. John D. Halamka MD
THE STIMULUS AND STANDARDS John D. Halamka MD THE ONC STRATEGY Grants - Accelerating Adoption Standards - Interim Final Rule Meaningful Use - Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Certification - Notice of Proposed
HIPAA for HIT and EHRs. Latest on Meaningful Use and EHR Certification: For Privacy and Security Professionals
HIPAA for HIT and EHRs Latest on Meaningful Use and EHR Certification: For Privacy and Security Professionals Donald Bechtel, CHP Siemens Health Services Patient Privacy Officer Fair Information Practices
CDA for Common Document Types: Objectives, Status, and Relationship to Computer-assisted Coding
CDA for Common Document Types: Objectives, Status, and Relationship to Computer-assisted Coding CDA for Common Document Types: Objectives, Status, and Relationship to Computer-assisted Coding by Liora
MEANINGFUL USE. Community Center Readiness Guide Additional Resource #13 Meaningful Use Implementation Tracking Tool (Template) CONTENTS:
Community Center Readiness Guide Additional Resource #13 Meaningful Use Implementation Tracking Tool (Template) MEANINGFUL USE HITECH s goal is not adoption alone but meaningful use of EHRs that is, their
What GI Practices Need to Know About the Electronic Health Record Incentive Program. Joel V. Brill, MD, AGAF Lawrence R. Kosinski, MD, MBA, AGAF
What GI Practices Need to Know About the Electronic Health Record Incentive Program Joel V. Brill, MD, AGAF Lawrence R. Kosinski, MD, MBA, AGAF Disclosures Joel V. Brill, MD AGAF AGA Registry Executive
TEST INSTRUCTIONS FOR CROSS VENDOR EXCHANGE TABLE OF CONTENTS
TEST INSTRUCTIONS FOR CROSS VENDOR EXCHANGE TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction...2 Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures... 3 Eligible Professionals 495.6(j)(14)... 3 Eligible Hospitals and Critical Access
Understanding Meaningful Use with a Focus on Testing the HL7 V2 Messaging Standards
Understanding Meaningful Use with a Focus on Testing the HL7 V2 Messaging Standards Robert Snelick, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Sheryl Taylor, Booz-Allen Hamilton (BAH) Use of
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Certification: A Guide for EHR Product Managers
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Certification: A Guide for EHR Product Managers Terminology Management is a foundational element to satisfying the Meaningful Use Stage 2 criteria and due to its complexity, and
EHR Software Feature Comparison
EHR Comparison ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS Patient demographics Manages the input and maintenance of patient information including demographics, insurance, contacts, referrals, notes and more. Consents
How to Achieve Meaningful Use with ICANotes
How to Achieve Meaningful Use with ICANotes Meaningful use involves using an EHR in a way that the government has defined as meaningful to collect incentive payments. but do not participate. Note: If you
The Big Picture: IDNT in Electronic Records Glossary
TERM DEFINITION CCI Canada Health Infoway Canadian Institute for Health Information EHR EMR EPR H L 7 (HL7) Canadian Classification of Interventions is the Canadian standard for classifying health care
New York ehealth Collaborative. Health Information Exchange and Interoperability April 2012
New York ehealth Collaborative Health Information Exchange and Interoperability April 2012 1 Introductions Information exchange patient, information, care team How is Health information exchanged Value
Component 6 - Health Management Information Systems. Objectives. Purpose of a Patient (medical) Record. Unit 3-1 Electronic Health Records
Component 6 - Health Management Information Systems Unit 3-1 Electronic Health Records Objectives State the similarities and differences between an EMR and an EHR Identify attributes and functions of an
HL7 and Service-oriented Architecture (SOA) Ambassador Briefing
HL7 and Service-oriented Architecture (SOA) Ambassador Briefing Topics Understanding Service-oriented Architecture (SOA) The case for Healthcare SOA Standards Introducing HSSP Status of Standards Work
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Focus on Stage 2. Kim Davis-Allen, Outreach Coordinator [email protected]
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Focus on Stage 2 Kim Davis-Allen, Outreach Coordinator [email protected] Understanding Participation Program Year Program Year January 1 st - December 31st. Year
The value MIE delivers can be summed up in two words:
The value MIE delivers can be summed up in two words: minimally TM invasive EHR WebChart EHR Portfolio minimally invasive TM Philosophy The MIE architecture was built to have a minimally invasive impact
How To Align With Common Ground And Shared In A Cloud Computing Environment
Shared /Cloud Computing Ready for Key Linkages between Federal, State and Local Communities John C. Dodd, Fellow for Health and Human and Enterprise Architecture CSC CSC Copyright 7/23/2010 4:24 PM 9269-10
Health Level Seven International Unlocking the Power of Health Information
Health Level Seven International Unlocking the Power of Health Information An ANSI accredited standards developer March 15, 2010 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Department of Health and Human
International HL7 Interoperability Conference - IHIC 2010
International HL7 Interoperability Conference - IHIC 2010 National ehealth Initiatives: Global Health Information Technology Standards Serving Local Needs Building Interoperability across many localities
Data Breach, Electronic Health Records and Healthcare Reform
Data Breach, Electronic Health Records and Healthcare Reform (This presentation is for informational purposes only and it is not intended, and should not be relied upon, as legal advice.) Overview of HIPAA
Setting the World on FHIR
Setting the World on FHIR W. Ed Hammond. Ph.D., FACMI, FAIMBE, FIMIA, FHL7 Director, Duke Center for Health Informatics Director, Applied Informatics Research, DHTS Director of Academic Affairs, MMCi Program
2011 AHIMA Curriculum Competencies and Knowledge Clusters - Health Information Management Baccalaureate Degree Effective August, 2011
2011 AHIMA Curriculum Competencies and Knowledge Clusters - Health Information Management Baccalaureate Degree Effective August, 2011 I. : Health Data Management I.A. Subdomain: Health Data Structure,
AHIMA Curriculum Map Health Information Management Baccalaureate Degree Approved by AHIMA Education Strategy Committee February 2011
HIM Baccalaureate Degree Entry Level Competencies (Student Learning Outcomes) I. Domain: Health Data Management I. A. Subdomain: Health Data Structure, Content and Standards 1. Manage health data (such
HL7 and Meaningful Use
HL7 and Meaningful Use Grant M. Wood HL7 Ambassador HIMSS14 2012 Health Level Seven International. All Rights Reserved. HL7 and Health Level Seven are registered trademarks of Health Level Seven International.
Enabling Patients Decision Making Power: A Meaningful Use Outcome. Lindsey Mongold, MHA HIT Practice Advisor Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality
Enabling Patients Decision Making Power: A Meaningful Use Outcome Lindsey Mongold, MHA HIT Practice Advisor Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality Today 1. Meaningful Use (MU) 2. 2/3rds of MU relates
HIMSS Interoperability Showcase 2011
Interoperability will bind together a wide network of real-time life critical data that not only transform but become healthcare. Health Information Interoperability Challenges Healthcare and healthcare
HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY*
GLOSSARY of COMMON TERMS and ACRONYMS In HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY* (April 2011) AHIC American Health Information Community The AHIC was a federal advisory panel created by HHS to make recommendations
International Organization for Standardization TC 215 Health Informatics. Audrey Dickerson, RN MS ISO/TC 215 Secretary
International Organization for Standardization TC 215 Health Informatics Audrey Dickerson, RN MS ISO/TC 215 Secretary 1 Topics Introduction to ISO TC 215, Health Informatics Definitions Structure Membership
